Jack,
Let me try to explain this again. It has nothing to do with software
built outside of fink, it has only to do with the way that the fink
packaging system works.
I'm going to explain this slowly, since we are miscommunicating, so
please be patient and read the whole thing! In fact,
Dear Fink developers,
I've just added the first fink package to provide 64bit libraries, to
the 10.4 tree only. The new package is called gmp-64bit, and it has
several new features which I'm going to suggest should become a
standard part of fink. I suggest that appending -64bit to the
On Jul 20, 2006, at 2:52 PM, Jack Howarth wrote:
Dave,
I understand how shared libraries are linked and acutely
aware that the dpkg/apt-get in fink is brain-dead in regard to
providing the appropriate shared library dependency information
compared to Debian.
On the contrary.
On Jul 10, 2006, at 3:35 PM, Jack Howarth wrote:
Dave,
In this case, I don't think the approach of making a compatibility
package is appropriate or wise. The current gcc4 in unstable, based
on the gcc snapshots, is neither fish nor fowl. It has a libgfortran
which has alway forked away
4.1.1) and gcc4.2 (whatever recent snapshot)? With the current 10.4
trees, I have to install my own (FSF) 4.0.x and 4.1.1, now that
unstable/gcc4 points to the 4.2 trunk. Or would this be more hassle than
it's worth?
David
/gcc4 points to the 4.2 trunk. Or would this be more hassle than
it's worth?
David: The reason the gcc4 package uses the 4.2 trunk is that there is
no support for intel macs in the 4.1.x or 4.0.x branches. If we make
packages for those, they will have to be ppc only.
I see. Forget about
with odcctools with a wee bit of patching, at least on
powerpc.) Anyhow, thanks for entertaining the discussion.
David
-
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre
The standard way of handing this situation is to introduce a new
package name for the package which provides a shared library that is
not backward compatible with the previous one. So, for example,
gdbm3-shlibs instead of gdbm-shlibs. That is why the symlink from /
sw/lib/libgdbm.dylib is
On Jun 30, 2006, at 8:01 PM, BABA Yoshihiko wrote:
Update of /cvsroot/fink/web/download
In directory sc8-pr-cvs5.sourceforge.net:/tmp/cvs-serv26882
Log Message:
adding Japaese to Sources for Binaries
Index: nav.ja.inc
===
Dear selected community (tricky ehy...)
It know that Fink has had a significant impact on the scientific
community. There are a couple of packages which are in darwinports but
not inf Fink and I would like to get a handle on how popular those
missing packages are in the scientific computing
system and nuances.
David Fang
Computer Systems Laboratory
Electrical Computer Engineering
Cornell University
http://www.csl.cornell.edu/~fang/
-- (2400 baud? Netscape 3.0?? lynx??? No problem!)
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done
fink (our
package manager Perl program)
David R. Morrison - For his continued hard work to make binary
releases such as Fink 0.8.1 happen
Benjamin Reed - For his continues hard work on KDE, his porting
efforts and the various extra tidbits he supplies us with.
Fink Todai team - For their continued
Hello Community.
Popularity is an important factor when it comes to driving an open
source project. Popularity and visitors to an open source project's
home page attract sponsors. Sponsors pay money so that we can ensure
Fink services its community better.
If you have a package in Fink that you
In reply to my own email :)
Go to the homepage of that package.
Check whether they provide a link to Fink's homepage. These backlinks
are very important as search engines calculate our pagerank based on
that.
If there is no link, get in touch with the author of the software or
the web-team
Dear Community
I have carefully reviewed the statistics that we generate for our
Package Database and the recent articles published for our Release of
version 0.8.1
In doing that I have noticed that German spoken countries are the
second largest community using our service, as such I would like
Dear Community.
Customer Feedback and statements on the quality of a product or
service that come directly from the community are very important for
any company that tries to make money.
They are equally important to us. Your opinion matters, because what
you think of us as a project can very
There is now a script available which will attempt to update a 10.4-
transitional (or 10.3) fink installation to the 10.4 tree. The
script comes in a tarball which also contains basic deb files for a
10.4 installation (and hence is nearly 12 MB).
I'll announce this script generally in a day
The new binary installers are available for testing, at
http://www.cgtp.duke.edu/~drm/Fink-0.8.1-Intel-Installer.dmg
http://www.cgtp.duke.edu/~drm/Fink-0.8.1-PowerPC-Installer.dmg
Each installer is designed to work on only one kind of hardware, and
should fail to install on the other.
anyway, since there is no compatibility version
information associated with otools -L on a .so.
I'm working in the 10.4 tree, and don't know much about the
relationships between the trees from a packaging standpoint. Should I
go ahead and submit my .info file for the 10.4 tree?
Thanks.
--
David
On Jun 1, 2006, at 8:50 AM, Peter O'Gorman wrote:
On Thu, 2006-06-01 at 01:15 -0400, David Reiser wrote:
no soap. I wonder if ${QOF_LIBS} is 'providing' -lfoo
Heh, I bet they still ahve a configure check for darwin that does a
sed
on the generated libtool script to always build dylibs
, and I'm
trying to keep the mac friendly ball rolling with limited knowledge
on my part.
--
David Reiser
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Fink-devel mailing list
Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
Thank you very much. That's what I needed to get started. The fog is
slowly lifting. Someday I'll really understand...
Dave
On May 31, 2006, at 4:28 PM, Daniel Macks wrote:
On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 09:25:50AM -0400, David Reiser wrote:
This isn't necessarily a fink question, but it might get
Another useful fact, not mentioned on that page: these days, libtool
and its autoconf friends can automatically name bundles as .so files
if they are set up properly. Perhaps Peter O'Gorman can give some
advice on this.
-- Dave
On May 31, 2006, at 3:05 PM, David Reiser wrote:
Thank
On May 31, 2006, at 7:20 PM, Peter O'Gorman wrote:
On Wed, 2006-05-31 at 09:25 -0400, David Reiser wrote:
This isn't necessarily a fink question, but it might get to be...
A change was made in gnucash 1.9.7 where the program looks to load
a .so module, but the compiler/linker only created
On May 31, 2006, at 7:20 PM, Peter O'Gorman wrote:
[snip]
gnucash-1.9 probably still uses libltdl to open modules, doesn't it?
Peter
The module of immediate interest is loaded by gmodule.
--
David Reiser
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Fink-devel mailing
On Jun 1, 2006, at 12:32 AM, Peter O'Gorman wrote:
On Wed, 2006-05-31 at 23:50 -0400, David Reiser wrote:
On May 31, 2006, at 7:20 PM, Peter O'Gorman wrote:
[snip]
gnucash-1.9 probably still uses libltdl to open modules, doesn't it?
Peter
The module of immediate interest is loaded
On May 13, 2006, at 3:23 AM, Martin Costabel wrote:
Now that cvs is up again, I guess everybody is reinventing the
wheel in the form of a little one-liner to convert their local CVS
repository to the new style.
To save others the time for testing, here is one that worked for me
(cut in
On May 14, 2006, at 12:32 PM, William Scott wrote:
I have a vague recollection that this was discussed before but
couldn't find it in the archives. Sorry.
Is there a way I can do a conditional test in the BuildDepends
field, so that I can have the package depend on dependency A on ppc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dear Community.
I have been thinking about geo-locating Fink Users for quite some time now.
This mainly serves two purposes. First of all I am very curious where all the
people that use Fink actually live and second of all, this should be a service
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Robert T Wyatt wrote:
I think this is a cool idea. Wouldn't it be easier to just set up a
Frappr page for fink users (http://www.frappr.com/)?
One reason would be, that I did not know about this web-site.
The other reason (now that I thought
Chris Zubrzycki wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Apr 24, 2006, at 4:50 AM, David H. wrote:
Hello fans.
For a long time it has been known that the algorithm we choose your
closest mirror by, might not be the best one. Here is a new idea and
I hope you will leave you
Hello fans.
For a long time it has been known that the algorithm we choose your
closest mirror by, might not be the best one. Here is a new idea and I
hope you will leave you comments for me.
It would be quite trivial to publish DNS LOC records for every mirror
that finkmirrors has to
thing for the last few weeks. Are there any
plans to fix it (if anything can be done from fink's side), or any status
updates? Didn't see any mention on fink.sf.net.
David Fang
Computer Systems Laboratory
Electrical Computer Engineering
Cornell University
http://www.csl.cornell.edu/~fang
On Apr 17, 2006, at 6:40 AM, Jean-François Mertens wrote:
Here:
1) qcad does build, provided making sure to use gcc3.3.
2) gift-fasttrack from 10.3/unstable (ie, 0.8.9-1) builds w/o
problem on 10.4
Thanks, I've put gift-fasttrack-0.8.9-1 into 10.4/unstable.
3) The svn/svk pkgs all build _
The packages listed below were brought forward from the 10.4-
transitional tree, but do not compile in the 10.4 tree. (They may or
may not compile in the 10.4-transitional tree.) They are being
removed from the 10.4 tree, and listed in the wiki. Of course, they
may be repaired and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello guys.
I have just installed Fink HEAD, so that is about 30 seconds old.
The validation for the bison sources is:
openssl sha1 /sw/src/bison-2.1.tar.gz
SHA1(/sw/src/bison-2.1.tar.gz)= b236923e7d4909c6fd8873ac87431833fa45069b
That file has
, Martin Costabel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David Bacher wrote:
On 4/9/06, Martin Costabel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does anyone know what this package is used for and whether moving its
options.h from /sw/include/ to /sw/share/autogen/ would be noticed by
anyone at all?
As the listed
Dear Fink developers,
We agreed some time ago to allow Application bundle packages in Fink,
and we now have a few of them. There is an AppBundles declaration
available in .info files (although I understand from some previous
email traffic that it does not really serve people's needs --
On Apr 10, 2006, at 9:32 AM, Jack Howarth wrote:
What exactly is the preferred method of handling the -mcpu and
-mtune compiler flags for dual use fink info files? For example, I
have a sparky-py.info packaging that currently optimizes for the
G5 with the -mtune flag. I would like to
On Apr 10, 2006, at 11:10 AM, Jack Howarth wrote:
Dave,
For the sparky-py fink packages, I have a sparky-py.patch which
patches the Makefile to have ...
-CXX= g++
-CXXFLAGS =
+CXX= g++-3.3
By the way, g++-3.3 is not available on intel, so unless you can make
for this package, I'm happy to try to build and
submit a more recent version -- and I'll find a solution for the
problem discussed above.
Cheers,
-dave
--
David Bacher _.. ._ ..._ .
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML
On Apr 9, 2006, at 4:11 PM, Peter O'Gorman wrote:
On Sun, 2006-04-09 at 12:07 -0600, Jeff Whitaker wrote:
Bill:
g95 does work on intel (gfortran doesn't). I've recently modified
octave, fftw, and scipy-py to use g95. I'll be working on converting
all packages to use g95.
The latest
On Apr 9, 2006, at 7:11 PM, William Scott wrote:
Thanks. But I could not figure out how to get 4.2 with subversion
(I can do it for 4.1).
You don't need to use subversion, since they release weekly snapshots
of the code.
For laughs, I returned to the stable release, 4.0.3, and
Redirected to fink-devel:
On Apr 7, 2006, at 3:31 PM, Hisashi T Fujinaka wrote:
On Fri, 7 Apr 2006, Alexander K. Hansen wrote:
On 4/6/06, Hisashi T Fujinaka [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 6 Apr 2006, Romy Schneider wrote:
I'm trying to install xfree86 on a new MacBook Pro. I haven't
On Apr 5, 2006, at 7:56 AM, Daniel Macks wrote:
On Wed, Apr 05, 2006 at 07:29:34AM -0400, Benjamin Reed wrote:
Max Horn wrote:
Do we have a tool that helps a package author to (semi)
automatically do
this? If yes, could somebody point me at it?
I don't think we have one, and every time I
Thanks for the report. Should be fixed now.
-- Dave
On Mar 29, 2006, at 5:22 AM, Robert T Wyatt wrote:
For about a day or two I've been getting the following on both 10.4
and 10.3:
cvs update: Updating update
Global symbol $basepath requires explicit package name at /sw/lib/
The 10.4 bindist is ready for testing. I would appreciate testing
reports being posted here, particularly if you are testing on intel
hardware.
To test (assuming that you are using the 10.4 tree already):
1) make sure that apt is installed
2) update fink to version 0.24.15 (now
On Mar 27, 2006, at 5:25 AM, Benjamin Reed wrote:
Martin Costabel wrote:
Before you move this from experimental to unstable, I'd like to
remind
you that with or without symlinks, this is *not* going to be
compatible
with any old package, as long as you change the install_name of the
On Mar 22, 2006, at 8:04 PM, David R. Morrison wrote:
Dear fink developers,
Please observe a code freeze in the 10.4/stable tree for the next
few days, while the 0.8.1 bindist is being built.
The freeze is over now; thanks for your help.
-- Dave
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dear Community.
I have to fly to Sydney on business and I would like to meet you. If you are
close to Sydney, or live there, please do not be shy. If you have questions
about fink PR, about the FDN plans or why Benjamin still packages KDE, meet me
On Mar 23, 2006, at 12:53 PM, Brendan Cully wrote:
He's also sent a patch that brings ocaml to this revision. I'm not
sure now whether it'd be better to add the patch or wait for the
next
ocaml release, but I'm leaning towards adding it once I've
checked it
on ppc.
I maintain a fink
On Mar 22, 2006, at 7:57 AM, Matthew Sachs wrote:
On Mar 22, 2006, at 09:01, Remi Mommsen wrote:
Hi Matthew,
On Mar 21, 2006, at 10:42 PM, Matthew Sachs wrote:
New buildfink data are up.
http://fink.opendarwin.org/build/2006-03-09/ppc/out/report.html
Dear fink developers,
Please observe a code freeze in the 10.4/stable tree for the next few
days, while the 0.8.1 bindist is being built.
Thanks,
Dave
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
On Mar 22, 2006, at 11:15 AM, Brendan Cully wrote:
On Wednesday, 22 March 2006 at 11:09, David R. Morrison wrote:
I've filed a radar for the gforth one, I'll file radars for the
ocaml, root4, and windowmaker failures too. It could be that
there's a problem with the inline assembly they're
On Mar 20, 2006, at 11:57 PM, Max Horn wrote:
Well, in my eyes, those rights were already severely cut when
those packages where moved to the intel tree, without the
maintainers being involved in anyway. Again, I understand the
logistic reasons for this. But: by this process, the packages
Is anyone else seeing the following warnings on a cvs fink-selfupdate
of 10.4 today?
cvs update: -m wrapper option is not supported remotely; ignored
Yes, just last night.
I haven't seen this one before.
Jack
Me neither.
Max,
I've just expanded the message which fink gives to users upon a
compile failure. If the user is on intel hardware, after the
suggestion to email the maintainer appears the sentence: Note that
many fink package maintainers do not (yet) have access to OSX on
Intel hardware, so you
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Trevor Harmon wrote:
On Mar 18, 2006, at 8:09 AM, David H. wrote:
snip
I'm not sure why this is necessary. Fink is growing, but that doesn't
mean it requires a corporate foundation. There are only two reasons
given on the wiki:
Thank you
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dear Community.
Before you read this, please make sure you verified and understood that it
comes from a trustworthy source. My name is David Höhn and what I do is
mentioned here on our official web-site:
http://fink.sourceforge.net/people.php?phpLang
On Mar 17, 2006, at 6:33 AM, Peter O'Gorman wrote:
On Thu, 2006-03-16 at 22:18 -0800, Kirk Volland wrote:
If you are still looking for a fortran compiler for
the Intel Mac, try HPC (High Performance Computing)
website. http://hpc.sourceforge.net/
It's author released an Intel binary of
Begin forwarded message:From: "David R. Morrison" [EMAIL PROTECTED]Date: March 17, 2006 6:46:30 AM PSTTo: Michèle Garoche [EMAIL PROTECTED]Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: dists/10.4/stable/main/finkinfo/editors cssed-filebrowser-plugin.info,1.4,1.5 cssed-findinfiles-plugin.info,1.4
On Mar 17, 2006, at 10:48 AM, Michèle Garoche wrote:Le 17 mars 2006 à 15:48, David R. Morrison a écrit :Begin forwarded message:From: "David R. Morrison" [EMAIL PROTECTED]Date: March 17, 2006 6:46:30 AM PSTTo: Michèle Garoche [EMAIL PROTECTED]Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: dists/1
On Mar 17, 2006, at 1:03 PM, Michèle Garoche wrote:
Update of /cvsroot/fink/dists/10.4/stable/main/finkinfo/editors
In directory sc8-pr-cvs1.sourceforge.net:/tmp/cvs-serv6436
Modified Files:
bluefish.info bluefish.patch
Log Message:
Does it compile now on Mac Intel?
Actually, the
to make to get it to fly.
It might be worth posting this to fink dev. In fact, I'll cc it now
to get the ball rolling
The incredibly knowledgable and helpful David Morrison is also at
Duke, but I doubt he makes house calls.
Hi Bill. Actually, I'm on sabbatical this year, just up
On Mar 14, 2006, at 5:18 AM, Alexander Hansen wrote:
I successfully built openoffice.org-firefox-2.0.1+m156-104 on my
PowerBook, which is currently set up for 10.4-transitional. So far
everything seems to run as it did on prior versions.
However, I was looking around at some of the
On Mar 12, 2006, at 5:03 PM, Max Horn wrote:
Am 12.03.2006 um 02:22 schrieb David R. Morrison:
On Mar 11, 2006, at 3:51 PM, Daniel Johnson wrote:
On Mar 10, 2006, at 10:57 AM, Keith Conger wrote:
Hi Max,
A couple packages of mine depend on SDL_mixer so I decided to
try to
fix
On Mar 11, 2006, at 3:51 PM, Daniel Johnson wrote:
On Mar 10, 2006, at 10:57 AM, Keith Conger wrote:
Hi Max,
A couple packages of mine depend on SDL_mixer so I decided to try to
fix on 10.4 intel. Looks like the fixes were in SDL_mixer cvs
already.
So I've include a patch and update
As a side note to this thread, I cannot get the current gcc4 package
in 10.4/unstable (which has gfortran as a SplitOff) to compile on
intel. The build log ends like this:
/bin/sh ./libtool --mode=compile /Volumes/Fink/fink.build/
gcc4-4.1.0-1/gcc-4.1.0/darwin/./gcc/xgcc
,
__gfortrani_compile_options minus L001$pb
/var/tmp//cc3Ah87d.s:18:symbol: __gfortrani_compile_options can't
be undefined in a subtraction expression
On Mar 7, 2006, at 7:11 AM, Peter O'Gorman wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
David R. Morrison wrote:
| /Volumes/Fink/fink.build
Dan,
This is the second bugfix in branch_0_24 that I've noticed recently.
Do we need any more? I'd like to move a recent 0.24.x to stable
pretty soon, but I guess we should have a bugfix release first. Is
this a good time, or are there more bugs to squash?
-- Dave
On Mar 6, 2006,
On Feb 27, 2006, at 4:13 PM, Dave Vasilevsky wrote:
On Feb 27, 2006, at 6:07 PM, Daniel Macks wrote:
if (defined $epoch) {%V=%e:%v-%r} else {%V=%v-%r}
More or less, though it's actually just $pv-get_fullversion() .
If an old fink that doesn't understand %V encounters it, do you
think
On Feb 28, 2006, at 9:32 AM, William Scott wrote:
Dear Powers that Be:
zsh has been maintained by dmalloc. I've been informally keeping it
up to date and bug-fixed on 10.4-transitional, and 4.2.6 is quite
stable.
zsh have just released the 4.3 series. This involves some major
On Feb 25, 2006, at 2:16 PM, Dave Vasilevsky wrote:
On Feb 25, 2006, at 4:07 PM, David R. Morrison wrote:
So its only because we don't have a deb for (old) gettext-tools?
If I built the old gettext-tools first it would be OK?
Gah, I've been getting things wrong. Lemme see if I can get
On Feb 24, 2006, at 3:00 AM, Michèle Garoche wrote:
Just for the record if it matters.
I've bootstrapped from HEAD in a new empty directory; bootstrapped
was fine: it installed gettext and its dependencies at version
0.10.40-19 on stable branch.
Then I've switched to unstable, removing
On Feb 25, 2006, at 4:55 AM, David R. Morrison wrote:
Well, upon further investigation this is a very curious story.
If I repeat the same steps as Michèle, but starting by
bootstrapping from branch_0_24, then the update goes OK. But if
the bootstrap is from HEAD, the update fails
On Feb 25, 2006, at 6:40 AM, Dave Vasilevsky wrote:
Alright, here's the reason SysState exists, and why it gives an
error. Dpkg has a reasonably serious bug in it: when a package is
upgraded, dpkg doesn't check to see if there are any versioned
dependencies that have become invalid.
On Feb 25, 2006, at 5:24 AM, David R. Morrison wrote:
The situation is this: foo and bar are initially splitoffs in the
same package, and foo depends on a specific version of bar. But in
the revision, foo and bar are in different packages. Due to
dependencies, fink updates bar before foo
On Feb 25, 2006, at 6:40 AM, Dave Vasilevsky wrote:
Alright, here's the reason SysState exists, and why it gives an
error. Dpkg has a reasonably serious bug in it: when a package is
upgraded, dpkg doesn't check to see if there are any versioned
dependencies that have become invalid.
On Feb 25, 2006, at 8:14 AM, Dave Vasilevsky wrote:
On Feb 25, 2006, at 9:48 AM, David R. Morrison wrote:
However, there are some pairs of packages (dclib0 and valknut come
to mind) which have been set up so that one depends on a precise
version of another. It seems to me
On Feb 25, 2006, at 9:38 AM, Dave Vasilevsky wrote:
The problem with gettext is that when you build and install
libgettext3-shlibs, the new gettext-tools hasn't been built yet!
Even though SysState *wants* to upgrade them as a unit, it can't do
so until it has .debs for all of them. The
On Feb 25, 2006, at 1:00 PM, Dave Vasilevsky wrote:
On Feb 25, 2006, at 3:28 PM, David R. Morrison wrote:
To explain: after the update, gettext (which really means gettext-
shlibs but for historical reasons is called gettext) and gettext-
dev are in one package, which is really just
Hi Michèle. I've seen things like this before. This kind of upgrade
issue is exactly why I haven't moved libgettext3 to stable. We need
to have a strategy for avoiding any issues with users who upgrade to
libgettext3.
Thanks for the report.
-- Dave
On Feb 24, 2006, at 3:00 AM,
Hi Baba. Actually, this change might not be a good idea. There is
no problem on the main site, but we also use this code on our remote
server pdb.finkproject.org. On that site, these menu items need to
point back to fink.sourceforge.net. So unless $root is going to get
defined there
On Feb 21, 2006, at 3:12 AM, Michèle Garoche wrote:
I'm a bit confused by the version-revision number for libncurses5
on 10.4.
They do not seem to exist in any tree.
Context: I bootstrapped from HEAD in a new empty directory.
Trying to see what needs to eventually be done on
On Feb 19, 2006, at 12:18 PM, Koen van der Drift wrote:
Hi,
After moving to 10.4, fink is unable to find the bindist for 10.4
when I execute the fink selfupdate command:
Err http://bindist.finkmirrors.net 10.4/release/main Packages
404 Not Found
If I go to
On Jan 20, 2006, at 9:44 AM, David R. Morrison wrote:
I am imposing a chill on CVS, for the 10.4-transitional tree
(both stable and unstable). During the chill, I ask that people
only make urgent commits, and that they try to avoid changing
packages which have a GCC tag. (Of course, bug
On Feb 18, 2006, at 1:04 PM, Koen van der Drift wrote:
On Feb 18, 2006, at 2:25 PM, David R. Morrison wrote:
The 10.4 tree is based on the state of the 10.4-transitional tree
on January 20, the day the chill began. Some of the more recent
changes were transferred over, but not in any
Folks,
The old perl packages perl-5.8.1 and perl-5.8.4 do not immediately
build on intel (because they require the gcc-3.3 compiler). While it
might be possible to fix this, my opinion is that our time is better
spent elsewhere than on old versions of software. If there is
disagreement
Begin forwarded message:From: "David R. Morrison" [EMAIL PROTECTED]Date: January 30, 2006 11:15:15 AM PSTTo: BuildSmart [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: [Fink-devel] unsupported 10.4.4 and G5 Quad requires fink modification. On Jan 29, 2006, at 12:10 PM, BuildSmart wrote: On Jan 29, 2006
Dear Fink developers,
As many of you are aware, the 10.4 tree is under construction and
will be made available within a week or so. Currently, if you
bootstrap fink from either CVS HEAD or branch_0_24, the *default* is
to bootstrap you into the new tree. You can affect this behavior by
P.S. You need XCode 2.2.1 in order to bootstrap into the 10.4 tree.
On Jan 28, 2006, at 10:57 AM, David R. Morrison wrote:
Dear Fink developers,
As many of you are aware, the 10.4 tree is under construction and
will be made available within a week or so. Currently, if you
bootstrap fink
I was trying to build lilypond (2.6.3-11) from source and it failed
during compilation of depency pacakge ec-fonts-mftraced (1.0.12-2)
The error is the following:
/bin/sh: /sw/bin/mftrace: /sw/bin/python2.3: bad interpreter: \
No such file or directory
I have python installed, but it's the
I am imposing a chill on CVS, for the 10.4-transitional tree (both
stable and unstable). During the chill, I ask that people only
make urgent commits, and that they try to avoid changing packages
which have a GCC tag. (Of course, bug fixes are always welcome,
particularly if they involve
On Jan 15, 2006, at 10:02 PM, Michèle Garoche wrote:
Le 16 janv. 2006 à 00:06, David R. Morrison a écrit :
I intend to declare a CVS freeze for both 10.4-transitional/
unstable and 10.4-transitional/stable, sometime within the next
week. Once the freeze is implemented
On Jan 15, 2006, at 10:02 PM, Michèle Garoche wrote:
And another question fully unrelated to doc, but maybe to package.
I've found fully per mere chance today the following line in
python24.patch in 10.4-transitional unstable:
+inc_dirs = self.compiler.include_dirs + ['@PREFIX/
I intend to declare a CVS freeze for both 10.4-transitional/unstable
and 10.4-transitional/stable, sometime within the next week. Once
the freeze is implemented, it will be in effect for at least several
days, possibly longer, as I construct the 10.4 tree. Anyone who
ignores the freeze
On Jan 15, 2006, at 4:17 PM, Hanspeter Niederstrasser wrote:
Hi,
Will libgettext3 be moved to stable before the freeze?
Hanspeter
No. There are some problems with moving libgettext3 to stable, and
given the urgency of creating a 10.4 tree so that fink will work on
Intel hardware,
On Jan 10, 2006, at 10:05 PM, Lars Rosengreen wrote:
On 1/10/06, David R. Morrison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 6, 2006, at 1:44 PM, Asko Kauppi wrote:
I have a package for Fink that is completely CPU ignorant; how
should I mark it such in the .info file?
That's the default behavior
On Jan 6, 2006, at 1:44 PM, Asko Kauppi wrote:
I have a package for Fink that is completely CPU ignorant; how
should I mark it such in the .info file?
That's the default behavior; no need to mark anything.
Also, what is the generic approach taken towards PowerPC/Intel
issue, which
On Jan 4, 2006, at 9:30 AM, Christian Schaffner wrote:
hi Charlie
On 03.01.2006, at 17:28, Charles Curry wrote:
I assume there is nothing wrong with compiling neon24 with gcc 4.0.1,
but the current package being distributed through Fink mirrors
seems to
prevent this. Might you be able to
501 - 600 of 1724 matches
Mail list logo
