Richard,
Good question. Set up two test servers and try it, and tell us the
result.
Dennis
A good plan, violently executed now, is better than a perfect plan next
week.. -- General George S. Patton
From: The IBM z/VM Operating
In the 1970's, a friend of mine's dad worked at NARF (Naval Air Rework
Facility) Alameda. They made system backups on paper tape, because it was
immune to EMP effects.
Dennis O'Brien
A good plan, violently executed now, is better than a
Ian,
If you have VM:Operator, you could use the dialog facility.
Dennis
A good plan, violently executed now, is better than a perfect plan next
week.. -- General George S. Patton
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating
Jim,
This looks familiar. What version of z/VM are you running? It might be
something that was used in an older release, and is no longer needed.
Dennis O'Brien
If I'd only followed CNBC's advice, I'd have $1 million today, provided
Adam,
You don't specify layer 2 or 3 on the NICDEF. You specify it on your
DEFINE LAN or DEFINE VSWITCH statement.
Dennis O'Brien
If I'd only followed CNBC's advice, I'd have $1 million today, provided
I'd started with $100 million. --
We have a few systems here with two virtual switches and two virtual
switch controller TCP/IP stacks (DTCVSW1 and DTCVSW2). One of my
co-workers has suggested that we create DTCVSW3 and DTCVSW4, so each
virtual switch can have two dedicated controllers. Is there any reason
to do this? It seems
Richard,
You could test it by IPLing a standalone utility on a DR tape drive from
your production center. Try it in a virtual machine first. If that
works, hopefully you have a test LPAR that you can try it on.
Dennis O'Brien
If I'd only
z/VM 5.3.0 was the first release to have an RSCS feature. Prior to
that, RSCS was a separate program product. It came preinstalled on the
z/VM distribution, at least as far back as the z/VM 5.1 DVD, but it was
a separate product which required a separate license. A special bid was
required to
Alan,
Will there be a new version of CP Planning and Administration to
document this change?
Dennis
If I'd only followed CNBC's advice, I'd have $1 million today, provided
I'd started with $100 million. -- Jon Stewart
-Original
I've been scouring OE and SFS doc for the last couple of weeks figuring
out how to get the BFS stuff moved from the installation system to our
existing VMSYS and VMSYSU file pools and I think I'm finally close. :-)
Alan Altmark answered this last week: FILEPOOL UNLOAD FILESPACE on your
soapbox
Is this yet another reason that IBM should not distribute such files as
compiled REXX, so the user could diagnose similar problems?
/soapbox
I agree with the sentiment, but in this case, it's misplaced. PROFPEEK
XEDIT on the S-disk is indeed compiled, but the source is also on the
Joe,
The simplest method to do a second-level install is to use an FTP server
on your PC to serve the DVD contents. If you're working from home, or
company policy prohibits FTP servers on PC's, here's an alternative. I
work from home, so it takes me several hours to upload the contents of
the
The key phrase is Free for personal use. Unless Joe owns his own z/VM
system, he's working for an organization of some sort. The free version
is specifically not allowed for corporate or institutional use.
Educational and non-profit institutions are encouraged to contact the
vendor for special
that zftpserver is running on..
Not hat it matters much. You use it for a couple of hours and then your
done with it anyways for a couple of years.
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System
[mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu]on Behalf Of O'Brien, Dennis L
Sent: Monday
Steve,
You can do a first-level install if you're willing to shut your VM
system down, or you have an extra LPAR to run the install in.
Dennis O'Brien
If I'd only followed CNBC's advice, I'd have $1 million today, provided
I'd started with
Jim,
Did you enroll the ROOT, SSLSERV, and GSKSSLDB BFS filespaces in your
SFS server? Did you create the objects that go in those filespaces?
Take a look at your starter system to see what they should look like. I
did my z/VM 5.4.0 upgrade by rotating in a new sysres set, so all that
was done
Mark,
Thanks, but I think we're getting to a point where the solution is more
trouble than the original problem. I'll just set a standard MAXSESSIONS
value that's big enough for our largest system. That will be bigger
than what our test systems need, but at least we will be testing the
same
Mark C,
Thanks. I implemented your suggestion, and it works fine. Am I correct
that whatever file I end up putting the :parms. tag in, I need to put
all the parameters of :parms. there? We have about 20 systems to
support. Ideally, I'd like to specify the EXEMPT parameter in SYSTEM
DTCPARMS,
Sorry..
But to me it's still akin to asking on a XEN/VMWare/HyperV list how to
recover a lost Windows Administrator password ! (although the latter
would actually qualify !).
--Ivan
If it's documented in a manual, it's hardly a secret.
Fortunately, I haven't used DIRMAINT for several years. The first
possibility that comes to mind is that the userid you're issuing DIRM
DIRECTORY from isn't authorized to issue the command. If that's not it,
my only other piece of advice is to shut DIRMAINT down, edit the DIRECT
record manually,
Mike,
Your suggestion won't work. You included the reason in the text that
you quoted from the manual:
The PROMPT parameter is only valid for the SAPL screen. This
parameter
is not acknowledged during CP bounce processing (SHUTDOWN REIPL or
restarting after an abend).
SHUTDOWN REIPL
Adam,
It looks like SERVICE is trying to service LE instead of LESFS. There
are a couple of items in the PSP bucket that have to do with SFS, but
the descriptions aren't an exact match for this problem. Did you read
all of the ZVM540 subsets and do what they said?
It's certainly possible to
So, any idea why the DOSINST and CMSDOS segments didn't want to rebuild
(I stupidly had CF1 accessed and was screwing around with SYSTEM CONFIG
while PUT2PROD was running, so I had to rebuild CMS and all the segments
the old-fashioned way)? I seem to recall this failing before sometime.
I don't
Mark,
What did you put in SYSTEM DTCPARMS or node DTCPARMS for your SSL
server? If you want to change anything for :nick.ssl in IBM DTCPARMS,
you have to copy the whole section for that nickname to your local file.
For example, I wanted to add a session limit and exempt low-strength
encryption
Of course this disclaimer is sufficient. It's at the bottom of the
note. I read it right after I finished reading the contents.
Dennis O'Brien
39,521
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System
of logging the user on. After all, the
same code is used to create the virtual machine.
Regards,
Richard Schuh
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System
[mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf Of O'Brien, Dennis L
Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2009
command, I might be
more inclined to agree with you.
Regards,
Richard Schuh
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System
[mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf Of O'Brien, Dennis L
Sent: Friday, March 06, 2009 10:31 AM
To: IBMVM
[mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf Of O'Brien, Dennis L
Sent: Wednesday, March 04, 2009 1:25 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Using LBYONLY
Shimon,
What release of VM:Secure are you running? In r2.8 G0808, it
definitely doesn't work
Shimon,
What release of VM:Secure are you running? In r2.8 G0808, it definitely
doesn't work. I tested before I posted. You're assuming that LOGON and
LOGONBY rules are evaluated together to determine the most specific
rule. That's not how it works. LOGON rules are evaluated first. If
the
Richard Schuh wrote:
And with VM:Secure, you can accomplish the same effect by using the
Rules Facility. With the following rules, the actual password is
immaterial:
REJECT * LOGON
ACCEPT userx LOGONBY
That doesn't work. The REJECT * LOGON rule takes precedence, and you
don't even
We have VM:Secure, but the same question came up the other day. We have
application userids that have a number of developers authorized to use
LOGONBY, but the application owners don't want those developers to be
able to change the Rules files for those userids. They want that
authority
Ivan,
IBM demonstrated a Live Guest Migration research project at the San Jose
SHARE. No statement was made regarding if or when it will be available,
but clearly IBM is doing more than just thinking about it.
Dennis O'Brien
39,585
CA ARCServe Backup for Mainframe Linux works with VM:Tape, but not
VM:Backup. I'm not allowed to endorse products (or unendorse them?). I
can say that we don't use the product.
A reliable product that works with VM:Backup would at least get looked
at here. Our current plan is to back z/VM up
Is the SSL server for 5.4 GA now? I don't see it on IBMLink.
Dennis
We have awakened a sleeping giant, and we have instilled in him a
terrible resolve. -- Admiral Yamamoto, following the attack on Pearl
Harbor
-Original Message-
David,
You didn't say anything about the userid that they're trying to log on
to. If all they need are some privileges that you don't want to grant
to their personal userids, can you have two, with eight LOGONBY users on
each, e.g. MAINT1 and MAINT2? Obviously, that won't work for some
things.
ISFC uses CTC connections. It doesn't use VTAM at all. Richard is
thinking of AVS. The major problem with ISFC is that not everyone has
channel extension equipment between data centers. A supported
IPGATE-type solution is needed before VTAM can go away.
As to the alleged difficulties of
Or you schedule your test at a time when you can take a sufficient
number of your normal guests down.
Dennis
Bitterly clinging to my guns.
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of
Adding a page volume is low risk. Just make sure you format the new volume
with CPFMTXA first. Whether you add a new volume or not, you should drain the
volume with errors, and make sure it's drained in SYSTEM CONFIG, too.
Dennis
First-level: PSW restart from the HMC.
Second-level: CP SEND CP xxx SYSTEM RESTART to the guest from a class C
userid.
Dennis
Bitterly clinging to my guns.
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL
Or SNAPDUMP, if you don't want to crash and restart.
Dennis
Bitterly clinging to my guns.
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Marcy Cortes
Sent: Friday, November 07, 2008
Alan,
http://www-03.ibm.com/systems/resources/systems_z_news_announcement_pdf_
zvm.pdf has a discussion of z/VM vs. VMWARE in Appendix B. I've seen a
link to an entire white paper devoted to a comparison of the two. I
thought it was on IBM's site, but a quick search didn't find it.
Robert,
You don't have to use the VMSYS filepool. You can create a new filepool
that doesn't start with VMSYS and share it between systems. The only
drawback is that if the system that hosts the filepool server isn't up,
the filepool isn't accessible to the other system.
We have filepool
Not exactly. We're starting a proof of concept, and as best I can tell, my
manager's manager is afraid that if it fails, mainframe Linux will be dead
here. I haven't talked to him directly, but that's what I'm getting from my
manager. Given the politics and turf wars inherent in an
Thank you for your suggestions of reasons to run 5.3.0 and 5.4.0. I had
already presented them to management, but I have been instructed to use
5.2.0. My only hope of changing management's mind is to give him
reasons NOT to use 5.2.0. Reasons to use the newer releases have not
been persuasive.
Is anyone running z/VM 5.2.0 on a z10? I know it's supported (with
PTF's). I want to know if customers are actually running it. My
management wants us to build some new systems to host Linux guests on
z/VM 5.2.0, even though most of our other systems are on 5.3.0. They
want stability, and one
Richard,
Are you using VM:Secure? If you are, you need an ACCEPT server DIAGD4
record in your system rules file. If you're not running G0808, you also
need GRANT SURROGAT TO server in AUTHORIZ CONFIG. The rule was
supposed to supersede the GRANT in G0706, but it doesn't.
and detach them.
David Dean
Information Systems
*bcbstauthorized*
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of O'Brien, Dennis L
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2008 7:28 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: DASD
Dave,
Create a basic directory entry, then use DIRM GET to get a copy, edit it
to add everything except MDISK's, then DIRM REPLACE to send it back to
DIRMAINT. Then use DIRM AMDISK to add the minidisks. I haven't used
DIRMAINT in several years, so I might be slightly off on the details.
Hans,
For SFS, take a look at the ALLDATES option of LISTFILE. You're correct
that there's no date of last access for minidisk files. You could scan
your VM:Secure audit files to look for links to the minidisk. That
won't tell you what files were accessed, but it will tell you that
someone is
page.
Bruce. I was not able to find the DIRLIST stage at Marist site. Would
you have the URL for their downloads.
Thanks again all for your thoughts on this subject.
Hans
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of O'Brien, Dennis L
Sent: October 8
We are sizing a new z/VM system for a Linux guest workload. We
traditionally use 3390-3 size devices for paging. We determined that we
need 16 3390-3's for this particular workload. Our DASD people asked if
we could use 3390-9's instead. Based on space, they want to give us 6
3390-9's for
I've been trying out IPGATE recently, because we have a couple of
systems with no good alternatives for remote SFS access. One of our
testers is reporting errors accessing a remote directory after the
connection has been idle for several hours. I would love to open an
ETR, but we all know that
Rob van der Heij wrote:
Actually, the better solution is to have *no* password for TCPMAINT.
You can with z/VM 5.3. Without a password, the TCPMAINT user can not
be revoked by incorrect logon attempts. If it were revoked, the
authorized people could not even logon to it with logonby. Also, you
Duane,
Add some device definitions in your 2nd level SYSTEM CONFIG, like this:
Rdevice 01A0-01BF Type 3270_Display
Without them, 2nd level CP will only detect consoles at IPL time if you
have one attached or dedicated. Dialed devices get reset when the guest
IPL's, so you can't DIAL and
The three SFS filepools that I share (2 on CP system, 1 on IFL system)
are
all GLOBAL resources.
I do find that once in a while IPGATE gets confused and
non-responsive and
I have to recycle the SVM on both sides of the link.
Tom Kern
I have the same problem with AVS. Once in awhile, a link
I did maintenance the way Jim and Kris do for awhile. Migrating to new
releases was such a pain that I now do SERVICE and PUT2PROD on the test
system first, then do them again in production. This way, I can run
MIGRATE to get ready for new releases. I added a 290 disk to MAINT that
has a backup
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of O'Brien, Dennis L
Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2008 9:34 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: [IBMVM] Query what the name of the SYTEM CONFIG file used
was?
Marcy,
You could also QUERY CPUID to find out where you are, but if you run in
the same place for DR tests
Marcy,
You could also QUERY CPUID to find out where you are, but if you run in
the same place for DR tests and real DR, that won't distinguish between
the two.
Dennis
A pistol! Are you expecting trouble Sir? No Miss, were I expecting
Mike,
This is Alan's co-worker. This happened several years ago, so I could
be fuzzy on the details.
In our case, the devices were check sorters, not tape drives. They were
bus-and-tag devices that should have been on a converted channel.
Someone was trying to save channels, so they were on an
Put a VTS in your DR site connected to you as the site for the twin
tapes. No movement of tapes now.
In fact, our remote site has a VTS for DR backups. Our local backups
are still in an STK silo. My comment about tape movement was in context
with David's suggestion of a fallback when the
Can't do that, unless you can guarantee that the tapes at the remote
site
are longer than the local copy (which would be unlikely). When the
backup
runs, writing to a given pair of tapes ends when the first one hits
EOT.
That's yet another complication for us if were to use twins. We use
9840
If you do a tape-to-tape copy, make sure your local and remote tape
volsers match. VM:Backup has the tape volsers in its catalog. If you
don't have the correct volsers at your remote site, you have a problem.
You could probably get away with different volsers if you code
VM:Backup's tape mount
No one has told us that the two backup runs have to be the same. The DR
backups are only used if the primary data center is a pile of rubble.
Who cares if they're a few hours older or newer than a set of tapes that
is now unusable, and may be irrecoverable? The disaster time is
unpredictable.
The other advantage of separate onsite and offsite backup jobs is
that
your onsite backups aren't held up when your channel extension
equipment
is down.
Very true. Depending on how smart your scratch exits are, you can fall
back on generating local volumes and adding them to the remote series,
Alan,
We use the same device number for each CEC that is sharing a device.
Other CEC's, or other channel sets on the same CEC, might use that
device number for another device. E.g. there might be 3 different DASD
volumes at device number 2000 in the data center, but every LPAR that
accesses a
Howard,
Directory statements are documented in CP Planning and Administration.
Chapter 17 for z/VM 5.3.0. Probably the same for slightly older
releases.
Dennis O'Brien
Don't worry about biting off more than you can chew. Your mouth is
No, VM:Secure is not an ESM for SFS. It can manage SFS enrollment, but
that's all.
Dennis O'Brien
Don't worry about biting off more than you can chew. Your mouth is
bigger than you think. -- CVW-11 chaplain, Carrier
-Original
describe this in more
detail:
http://www.vm.ibm.com/perf/tips/dim.html
http://www.vm.ibm.com/perf/tips/vmdspage.html
2008/5/17 O'Brien, Dennis L Dennis.L.O'[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
We recently inherited responsibility for a z/VM 5.2 system that had
been
maintained by another group. They had a DR
We recently inherited responsibility for a z/VM 5.2 system that had been
maintained by another group. They had a DR test today, and I logged on
and looked around. The LPAR is configured with 3G central storage and
no expanded storage. I issued the following commands:
q alloc page
/tips/dim.html
http://www.vm.ibm.com/perf/tips/vmdspage.html
2008/5/17 O'Brien, Dennis L Dennis.L.O'[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
We recently inherited responsibility for a z/VM 5.2 system that had
been
maintained by another group. They had a DR test today, and I logged
on
and looked around. The LPAR
I've been asked whether our z/VM systems could convert to using only
virtual tape. One of the possible sticking points is vendor software.
If necessary, we could keep a couple of manual tape drives around for
software installs. I'm trying to determine if it's necessary.
Have IBM or any other
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of O'Brien, Dennis L
Sent: Monday, May 05, 2008 3:25 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Software on tape
I've been asked whether our z/VM systems could convert to
using only virtual tape. One of the possible sticking points
is vendor software.
If necessary, we could
to
IBM customer numbers.
Regards,
Richard Schuh
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of O'Brien, Dennis L
Sent: Monday, May 05, 2008 3:44 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Software on tape
Richard,
We have a CA
The backups are kept safe and sound, right next to the Iraqi weapons of
mass destruction.
But yeah, compared to the Clintons, the Bush regime has been remarkably
scandal-free.
Dennis
It's 10:00 PM. Do you know where your backup tapes are?
Yes, the other bank formerly based in SF posted this before. Here it
is again:
Guest RDev VDev
GUEST1DC00 DC00
GUEST1DC01 DC01
GUEST1DC0A DC02
GUEST2DC02 DC00
GUEST2DC03 DC01
GUEST2DC0B DC02
GUEST3DC04 DC00
GUEST3DC05 DC01
GUEST3
Alan didn't mention that we're a large shop, and most of the mainframes
are 2000 miles away from the programmers. One of them is on the other
side of the Atlantic. KVM switches and HMC access aren't going to work.
I looked for information on SSL support in OSA-ICC and didn't find any.
The
Lionel,
SET SHARE userid RELATIVE 1 LIMITHARD should take it down as low as it
can go. If you want no service at all, CP SEND CP userid SLEEP 99 HRS
should do it. I take it you don't want to just FORCE the userid?
Dennis O'Brien
A society
We're planning our training for the year, and wondering about the value
of SHARE vs. zSeries Expo. Several of us have been to SHARE, but none
have been to the Expo. What do people who've been to both think of
each?
Dennis O'Brien
Just
I'm sure the people planning for the new hardware have considered it.
I was just concerned that in their plan they had no native physical
tape
for VM.
Ann,
You should check. Our storage people brought in a remote VTS to replace
tapes that were being physically moved offsite. They were
Richard,
You could lose any existing CP dump files that are still in SPOOL when
you reallocate. AFAIK, VMDUMP files go on regular SPOOL volumes, so
they shouldn't be affected. If the existing dump volumes are becoming
regular SPOOL volumes, with the same volsers and slots, I would expect
Ann,
You shouldn't have any trouble using virtual tape with VM or VM:Tape.
We use it here, primarily for VM:Backup and VM:Spool. VM:Spool uses
SPXTAPE under the covers. I'm sure DDR will work fine, too. One phase
of our DR process mounts virtual tapes as FOREIGN on another VM system,
and it
And it will get jealous if you upgrade to a better model.
And don't even THINK about outsourcing some of your work to a
timesharing service while you have one.
Dennis
The popularity and effectiveness of modern anti-depressants is one of
-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of O'Brien, Dennis L
Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2008 12:53 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Any Rumors?
And it will get jealous if you upgrade to a better model
Since this is a VM-to-VM transfer, why not use SENDFILE or cross-node
Shared File System instead of FTP? Either of those methods will
preserve the date and time.
Dennis
The popularity and effectiveness of modern anti-depressants is one of
.
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of O'Brien, Dennis L
Sent: Friday, February 08, 2008 3:45 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: FTP - how can I preserve date time?
Since this is a VM-to-VM transfer, why not use SENDFILE or cross-node
Has this capability been anounced yet? We could really use that.
I tried reversing the polarity but, despite all the Star Trek I've
watched, it didn't help. Perhaps I should have watched some MacGyver.
Brian Nielsen
Perhaps you've run into a case that's covered by the maxim that was
posted
Phillip,
Have you tried the WAIT option on DFSMSRM MOUNT? Do you need to trap
the response from DFSMSRM, or will the return code be sufficient?
Dennis
The popularity and effectiveness of modern anti-depressants is one of
the great
It's true that you can't add devices dynamically from VM if VM isn't the
owner of the IOCDS, but you can add them from z/OS and VM will see them.
Dennis
I do not feel obliged to believe that the same God who has endowed us
with sense,
I've been poking around IBM's web site, trying to find out if the Tivoli
Storage Manager (TSM) server is still supported for VM. I know it
hasn't been enhanced in years. I just want to know if it's still
supported. I think the answer is no. I found these two documents:
Dave,
DFSMSRM QUERY LIBRARY INVENTORY ALL will send a file to your reader
listing every volume in the library. It can take a few minutes to
complete.
Dennis
The right to be heard does not automatically include the right to be
taken
Phillip,
The LMP key goes in file CALMP KEYS on VMRMAINT 192. You can XEDIT the
file directly, or run VMIMAINT and select Update Central LMP Keys File
from the menu.
Dennis O'Brien
The right to be heard does not automatically include the
Rich's command below is fine if you want to erase a file on DIRMAINT,
but Derek asked how to erase a file on DISKACNT. DIRMAINT has no
special powers to erase files on other virtual machines. You either
need to shut DISKACNT down to erase the file, or use Shared File System
instead of a minidisk
Daniel,
For our JES2 guests, we attach tape drives to all the guests using
ATTACH or DEDICATE with the MULTIUSER option. The guests run CA's MIA
product to control sharing. We also use MIA on our JES2 LPAR systems.
Our JES3 LPAR systems use JES3's own tape sharing support. This
requires
Unless things have changed, each OSA triplet has to start on an even
real address, but the real addresses don't have to be consecutive.
Here's how we arrange ours. This setup pre-dates Guest LAN and Virtual
Switch.
Virtual
Machine Real Virtual
GUEST1 100100
GUEST1 101101
GUEST1
, Dennis L
Sent: Friday, August 24, 2007 11:56 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: OSA question
Unless things have changed, each OSA triplet has to start on an even
real address, but the real addresses don't have to be consecutive.
Here's how we arrange ours. This setup pre-dates Guest LAN
I agree with Richard. Not only do you have a serialization issue with multiple
people able to issue commands, but all these additional commands would need to
be logable by an ESM. I can't think of any cases where I'd want to give SEND
or SIGNAL SHUTDOWN authorization to general users. If I
August,
We use CRYPTO statements in the VM directory. Here's an example from a
z9. z890/z990's use the same syntax. z800/z900's are different.
CRYPTO DOMAIN 00 APDED 1
The Creating and Updating a User Directory chapter in CP Planning and
Administration has the syntax. That's Chapter 17 in
What Linux package is generally used to provide Z/VM 5.3 with SSL?
TCP/IP Planning and Customization says, Detailed information about
Linux requirements and preparation for use by the SSL server are
available at the TCP/IP Feature home page on the World Wide Web. Go to
the following Web site,
You don't need DirMaint or ISPF for the RMS component of DFSMS. You do
need to put the control files in SFS, unless you're willing to modify
the code to use a minidisk. Some of the code is in REXX, but some
isn't, so I don't know if it's even possible to change it to use a
minidisk.
To install from DVD second-level, the first-level system must be z/VM
5.1 or later. There are programs on MAINT 2CC that you need for the DVD
install, and 5.1 was the first release that had them. I suspect that if
you have access to a z/VM 5.x system, you could copy over the MAINT 2CC
disk to
101 - 200 of 235 matches
Mail list logo
