Hi there,
On Fri, 19 Sep 2003, Tobias Kremer wrote:
> I have developed an application based on Apache 1.3.27,
> mod_perl 1.27, Postgres 7.3.2, Class::DBI 0.94 (utilizes
> Ima::DBI) on SuSE Linux 7.0 with a 2.4.20 kernel.
>
> The problem is that everytime more than one request at
> a time is made
Hello there,
On Wed, 17 Sep 2003, Malka Cymbalista wrote:
> I am currently running apache 1.3.26 with mod_perl 1.36 and Perl
> 5.6.1 on my web server which is a Sun Solaris machine ...
> I would like to install Apache 2, mod_perl 2, and Perl 5.8.
While Apache version 2 is stable, mod_perl versio
Hi there,
On Wed, 17 Sep 2003, Andrey A. Kudrin wrote:
> I've compiled apache 1.3.28 + mod_perl 1.28 + mod_ssl 2.8.15.
> Before that all was ok,
Before what? Before mod_ssl? Try it without. Have you checked in
the documentation that the version of mod_ssl is suitable for your
purposes?
> but
Hi all,
On Tue, 16 Sep 2003, Frank Maas wrote:
> | How to avoid multiple logins?
> |
> | The short answer is: you can't.
Sure you can. Charge $10 per login.
73,
Ged.
Hi there,
On Fri, 12 Sep 2003, William McCabe wrote:
> I've got a lot of experience with mod_perl on both linux and AIX and
> can state categorically that there are no typical conditions which
> would cause AIX run "strangely slowly" compared to linux on
> comparable hardware.
That's useful info
Hi there,
On Fri, 12 Sep 2003, Rafael Garcia-Suarez wrote:
> Benchmarking simple CPU-intensive perl scripts shows that they
> tend to be consistently slower in user time on AIX.
Assuming that the boxes aren't otherwise heavily loaded, I wonder
about the options used to compile your Perl. For x8
Hi there,
On Fri, 12 Sep 2003, Rafael Garcia-Suarez wrote:
> we're porting on AIX (4.3.3 and 5.2.0). The AIX boxes are
> supposed to be more powerful than their Linux equivalents,
> however the application is strangely slow on AIX
You don't give much to go on. Are they really more powerful?
Wh
Hi there,
On Sat, 6 Sep 2003, Bart Terryn wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have an application running under apache
> 1.37(win32)/mod_perl1.27_01-dev/perl5.6 build 633
>
> I am trying to move this application to apache
> 2.0.47(win32)/mod_perl1.99_10-dev/perl 5.8
>
> However I run into a problem with charac
Hi there,
On Wed, 3 Sep 2003, kfr wrote:
> http://www.webdav.org/specs/draft-leach-uuids-guids-01.txt
>
> from section 3.5 ... I was assuming there was some way to parse and decrypt
> the mac address from:
>
>
> "The following is an example of the string representation of a UUID:
> f81d4fae-7d
Hi there,
On Wed, 3 Sep 2003, kfr wrote:
> had to re-compile my server with mod_ssl
:)
> the hardware address is really what I'm after.
What hardware?
73,
Ged.
--
Reporting bugs: http://perl.apache.org/bugs/
Mail list info: http://perl.apache.org/maillist/modperl.html
Hi there,
On Wed, 3 Sep 2003, kfr wrote:
> Anyone know how to capture the UUID from a request?
What makes you think there'll be one in there?
> I've been looking all over the place and cant seem to find any
> reference to it anywhere ...
Try Google?
73,
Ged.
--
Reporting bugs: http://perl
Hi there,
On Fri, 29 Aug 2003, Stathy G. Touloumis wrote:
> should building a DSO in mod_perl 1.x versions just be avoided?
I think so, and so I think does Randal. This was discussed briefly
here not long ago in a couple of threads, check the archives.
73,
Ged.
--
Reporting bugs: http://pe
Hi Stas,
On Fri, 29 Aug 2003, Stas Bekman wrote:
> Ged Haywood wrote:
> > Have you mentioned this to Philippe Chiasson?
>
> Beg your pardon, Ged? What this has to do with Philippe?
Wasn't he organising the release of mod_perl 1.28?
If people are moving to a 1.3.28/1.28
Hi guys,
On Thu, 28 Aug 2003, Perrin Harkins wrote:
> simran wrote:
> > The above code works perfectly on:
> >
> > * On dev server in a standalone script
> > * On our dev server under: Apache/1.3.27 (Unix) mod_ssl/2.8.12 OpenSSL/0.9.6c
> > DAV/1.0.3 mod_perl/1.27
> > * Our live server as
Hi there,
On Wed, 27 Aug 2003, Bernd Kuhls wrote:
> I am trying to compile mod_perl-1.28 without luck.
> SUSE 5.3 (I know it´s old)
> gcc version 2.7.2.1
=:0
> Perl-5.8.0, Apache-1.3.28 & mod_perl-1.28 from source.
> With Apache-1.3.27 and mod_perl-1.27 I could compile using the same
> Perl-i
Hello again,
On Wed, 27 Aug 2003, Alan Rafagudinov wrote:
> GH> Please post the output of
> GH> gcc -v
>
> Reading specs from /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i386-asplinux-linux/2.96/specs
> gcc version 2.96 2731 (ASPLinux 7.1 2.96-85.asp)
Make sure to use that compiler to build Perl, mod_perl and Apache.
Hi there,
On Wed, 27 Aug 2003, Alan Rafagudinov wrote:
> I've downloaded apache_1.3.28.tar.gz & mod_perl-1.28.tar.gz
> [snip]
> tests failed:
> [snip]
> Summary of my perl5 (revision 5.0 version 6 subversion 0) configuration:
> Platform:
> osname=linux, osvers=2.2.16-22smp, archname=i386-li
Hi there,
On Wed, 27 Aug 2003, Charlie Garrison wrote:
> Do you also write the apache module for the frontend server? I'm very
> competent at perl, but not competent enough to write an apache module.
It's not so hard. There's a skeleton module in the Apache sources for
you to start with, take a
Hi there
On Tue, 26 Aug 2003, Patrick West wrote:
> Apparently $net::httpserver is set incorrectly,
> [snip]
> So ... where is $net::httpserver being set?
t/net/config.pl
73,
Ged.
PS: Please keep it on the list... :)
--
Reporting bugs: http://perl.apache.org/bugs/
Mail list info: http://pe
Hello there,
On Mon, 25 Aug 2003, Alan Rafagudinov wrote:
> I've downloaded apache_1.3.28.tar.gz & mod_perl-1.28.tar.gz
> and unarchive it to /usr/src/httpd_perl for back-end server
>
> then when I make
>
> perl Makefile.PL APACHE_SRC=../apache_1.3.28/src/ DO_HTTPD=1 USE_APACI=1
> EVERYTHING=1
Hi there,
On Tue, 26 Aug 2003, Patrick West wrote:
> I've installed apache_1.3.27 and mod_perl-1.27. When I go to run the
> tests in mod_perl-1.27/t (just running the first one), first it
> complains that it couldn't start the server. But the server is
> actually running.
Are you sure you have t
Hi there,
On Sat, 16 Aug 2003, Cory 'G' Watson wrote:
> started flipping switches and localized it to PerlFreshRestart being on.
Have you read
http://perl.apache.org/docs/1.0/guide/troubleshooting.html#Evil_things_might_happen_when_using_PerlFreshRestart
> When I turn it off, the eval() happen
Hello again,
On Fri, 15 Aug 2003, Cory 'G' Watson wrote:
> PerlVar app blah
>
> App->loadApp("blah", "/usr/local/blah/lib");
>
> [snip]
> Ignore syntax errors and lack of declarations, as I just threw that
> together from memory
The guesswork would be a lot easier if it didn't involve so mu
Hi there,
On Fri, 15 Aug 2003, Cory 'G' Watson wrote:
> It looks as though this works during the first 'load' that Apache does,
> which I'm assuming is the phase that checks for errors. The second
> phase seems to cause my global hash to get undef'ed, even though the
> loadPages() method work
Hello again,
On Tue, 5 Aug 2003, Hodge, Jeff F (ECIII) wrote:
> My directories look exactly like that.
:)
> First I went to the apache directory and ran the configure to enable DSO.
Do you have any particular reason for using DSO? IMHO it's usually
more trouble than it's worth. I always bui
Hi there,
On Thu, 7 Aug 2003, Mustafa Tan wrote:
> script's name is A, and I execute the same script 20
> times subsequently there is no problem. But if I
> execute B after A, and then execute A again, then I
> have a problem and the problem is that there is a
> socket error. This happens only on
Hi there,
On Sun, 10 Aug 2003, Michael Maciag wrote:
> Is the read_post in ModPerl::Test destructive in some way? If so, could
> someone point me in the right direction I might take to modify it to be
> non-destructive?
I think you'll find that reading POST data has always been destructive.
If y
Hello there,
On Mon, 4 Aug 2003, Hodge, Jeff F (ECIII) wrote:
> Here's how I installed mod_perl/apache:
>
> cd apache_1.3.28
> ./configure --enable-module=so
> cd mod_perl_1.28
I don't like the look of that. Please send *exactly* what you did.
Have you got the mod_perl directory inside the a
Hello again,
On Fri, 1 Aug 2003, Tofu Optimist wrote:
> To recap: I freshly installed RedHat 9 on a box,
> then used RPM to remove modules involving httpd.
> (See notes below). Then I built perl 5.8.0 from
> source, first doing a "export LANG=C"
why not
LANG=en_US
?
> Then as root I used CPA
Hi there,
On Fri, 1 Aug 2003, Tofu Optimist wrote:
> Exactly HOW do I change the locale?
http://twiki.org/cgi-bin/view/Codev/UsingPerl58OnRedHat8
about half a dozen messages down. See also
http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87682
> make && make install
>
> again, yes?
Bett
Hi there,
On Fri, 1 Aug 2003, Tofu Optimist wrote:
> Rather than /usr/src, I put in /home/aprk
That's fine. But in future, tell us what you did, not some fiction... :)
> Yes, you are correct. make && make test as non-root,
> then install as root. (Odd, isn't it, the docs at
> http://perl.apa
Hello again,
On Fri, 1 Aug 2003, Tofu Optimist wrote:
> --- Ged Haywood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > How did you do the
> >
> > perl Makefile.PL
> >
> > step?
>
> % cd /usr/src
> % tar xzvf apache_1.3.xx.tar.gz
> % tar xzvf
Hi there,
On Fri, 1 Aug 2003, Tofu Optimist wrote:
> sorry to break the thread in two.
:(
> Why did it skip 6 tests?
How did you do the
perl Makefile.PL
step?
73,
Ged.
Hi there,
On Thu, 3 Jul 2003, Gerd Knops wrote:
> I got a really odd problem: I have identical mod_perl/apache installs
> on FreeBSD 3.x systems and a few Redhat 7.3 systems.
>
> After some time running OK, the Redhat systems start acting up.
> Transmissions are suddenly cut of after somewhere
Hi there,
On Fri, 25 Jul 2003, John Siracusa wrote:
> Has anyone gotten this to work on OS X?
> [snip]
> I've used this profiling technique on other Unix-like OSes, so I think
> I'm doing it right.
I'm sure you're doing it right.
> But on OS X, I get a tiny tmon.out file that never grows afte
Hello there,
On Thu, 24 Jul 2003, Robert Lee wrote:
> I am new to Apache/mod_perl and everything else.
We're all still learning...
> I bought a fairly good book on Apache/mysql/mod_perl.
There are others, see the mod_perl web site:
http://perl.apache.org
> Unfortunately, it is based on the
Hi Matt,
On Wed, 23 Jul 2003, Matt Sergeant wrote:
> The main reason I like AxKit is it prevents me from screwing up [snip]
> I just write straight perl code. I barely notice that I'm using XML.
Can you give us in a couple of sentences your take on the state of XML
in general and AxKit in parti
Hi there,
On Thu, 17 Jul 2003, Bernhard Donaubauer wrote:
> I just startet learning mod_perl and apache. I use the current version of
> mod_perl 1 and apache 1.3. Perl itself has version 6.5.1.
Can you be a little more careful with your version numbers in future?
> but my testapplication does
Hi there,
On Wed, 16 Jul 2003, Matthew Wu wrote:
>I put all my subroutine in file.pm, what I need to do such that it
> can be used by my program? I don't what location I need to put it in and
> what kind of configuration I need to modify. I am running Redhat 6.3.
At the risk of repetition...
Hi Jez,
On Wed, 16 Jul 2003, Jez Hancock wrote:
> [snip] We started looking at mod_log_sql: [snip]
> but had trouble getting it to work on FreeBSD unfortunately.
I'd have thought something a bit lighter might do for this.
> Right now it seems a bit silly having a separate ErrorLog line in each
Hi there,
On Wed, 16 Jul 2003, Grant Cooper wrote:
> I was upgrading to perl5.8 using freeBSD
>
> To install via ports, I typed this : cd /usr/ports/lang/perl5.8
> make install clean
> rehash
> use.perl port
>
> What does rehash do?
> And what does use.perl port do?
This List is for question
Hi there,
On Tue, 15 Jul 2003, Jez Hancock wrote:
> Does anyone how one could log errorlog entries in a similar manner to
> the script above - ie pipe the errorlog to a script which appends one
> copy of the error entry to a main error logfile and another copy to the
> virtual host's error logfil
Hi there,
On Sun, 13 Jul 2003, Dennis Stout wrote:
> I downloaded source for Apache, PHP, and mod_perl and compiled it all and had
> it working in about the time it took to download it + compile time + about 5
> minutes.
>
> There is no config to mod_perl really. Either it's there or it isn't.
Hello there,
On Sun, 13 Jul 2003, Bulba007 wrote:
> When must I to use mod_perl? It is necessary?
No, it's not necessary.
You may want to use mod_perl if you want to use Perl scripting with
the Apache Web server. At the expense of some complexity, especially
in the installation and configurati
Hi there,
On Sat, 12 Jul 2003, Jesse Erlbaum wrote:
> > Is it possible to dynamically ban IP addresses using mod_perl.
>
> Yes, it is possible with mod_perl. You can create a PerlAccessHandler
In addition to Jesses's comments, I'd suggest that you might want to
look at firewalling techniques t
Hi there,
On Thu, 10 Jul 2003, Stewart, Eric wrote:
> RedHat Linux 9.0, with Apache 1.3.27, PHP 4.3.2, and mod_perl 1.28,
> I'm getting a compile error. [snip] I'm thinking it's more along
> the lines of a compiler (IOW, RedHat's use of gcc 3.2.2) issue.
It *might* be the compiler, but I doubt
Hi there,
On Mon, 7 Jul 2003, Kirk Bowe wrote:
> ProxyPass / http://other.server.with.specified.port.com:8082/
> ProxyPassReverse / http://other.server.with.specified.port.com:8082/
> ProxyReceiveBufferSize 16384
>
> Most of it works fine but I appear to be losing content types.
Is it something
Hi there,
On 8 Jul 2003, Walter H. van Holst wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-07-08 at 10:14, Matt Sergeant wrote:
>
> > Sorry Ged, Walter is talking about CONNECT which is a proxy request.
Argh. :)
> Well, thanks to a someone on IRC I have found a code snippet that might
> do exactly that. So it appear
Hi there,
On 7 Jul 2003, Walter H. van Holst wrote:
> I am new to mod_perl and am trying to figure out whether it suits my
> needs or not. Can I use it to intercept any http CONNECT requests Apache
> receives and answer those?
The concept of a connection is at the transport level, way below HTT
Hello there,
On Sun, 6 Jul 2003, Oskar wrote:
> I have script that is doing some time consuming operations
This has been discussed many times on the List, check the archives.
73,
Ged.
Hi there,
On Thu, 3 Jul 2003, Ranga Nathan wrote:
> >In other words there's an Apache still running
>
> The 'top' output is :
> [snip]
> How can I get a list of ports being used so I can kill the processes?
As I said, there may be more wrong than just what's obvious. It looks
like the obvious
Hi there,
On Thu, 3 Jul 2003, Dennis Stout wrote:
> > I made a simple mod_perl change to the config and when restarting Apache
> > I got this error:
> > (98)Address already in use: make_sock: could not bind to address
> > 0.0.0.0:2250
> > no listening sockets available, shutting down
> > /usr/l
Hi there,
On Thu, 3 Jul 2003, ColinB wrote:
> What is the preferred method of compiling mod_perl - static or dynamic?
Static. (But that's just my opinion after years of experience and
watching people running into trouble with DSO mod_perl on this List. :)
> I have read that *static* linking is
Hi there,
On Wed, 2 Jul 2003, Dennis Stout wrote:
> This also means I can write a small subroutine to eval a form that's been
> posted, and given the authentication passes, add code to the thing while it's
> running, AND save the code to the DB so it'll be around for reboots.
>
> Wouldn't that j
Hello again,
On Thu, 3 Jul 2003, Ged Haywood wrote:
> There's nothing else in that function that would be likely to cause the
> fault, if pool were invalid I'd expect it to happen in poolAppendChar().
Of course unless poolAppendChar() turns out to be a function defined
by a macr
Hi there,
Haven't seen any replies, so I thought you'd like to hear from someone. :)
On Wed, 2 Jul 2003, Ruslan U. Zakirov wrote:
> I've tried to use XML::XPath under mod_perl 1.27 and Apache 1.3.27, but
> got segmentation fault
It's not uncommon to see XML and segfaults in the same post. :(
H
Hi there,
On Mon, 30 Jun 2003, Nigel Hamilton wrote:
> I recently managed to get the RAM consumption of my server under control.
:)
> Does anyone have a really lean and mean mod_perl, Apache configuration
On the face of it 20Mb looks a bit heavy for mod_perl processes. But
it depends so much
Hi Ken,
On Fri, 20 Jun 2003, Ken Y. Clark wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Jun 2003, Ged Haywood wrote:
>
> > All new code should use handlers.
>
> I wouldn't be so strict about such definitions.
I didn't say "must". :)
> Or am I missing something?
You will get
Hi there,
On Fri, 20 Jun 2003, Peter B. Ensch wrote:
> I'm beginning to develop apps under mod_perl. I'm
> curious as to how people decide between coding for
> Apache::Registry vs. mod_perl handlers.
Use Apache::Registry only if you have to in order to get legacy CGI
scripts working.
> It's bee
Hi there,
On Thu, 19 Jun 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> My question now is, did Doug take this into consideration when he
> build mod_perl v1.27 (w/ PERL_USELARGEFILES=0)
I'm sure Doug took into consideration all sorts of things we never
even thought about. Try it out and let us know what happ
Hi Jaco,
On Wed, 18 Jun 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> As you can see it suggests rebuilding mod_perl with
> $PERL_USELARGEFILES=0 (which we do) so according to him it will work?
Well it's in the list of suggestions, I don't think that's quite the
same thing... I guess the bit about nobody lis
Hi Stas,
On Wed, 18 Jun 2003, Stas Bekman wrote:
> Please try it out:
> http://www.apache.org/~stas/Apache-Test-1.03-dev.tar.gz
Neat!
73,
Ged.
Script started on Wed Jun 18 13:29:03 2003
hurricane:~/src/Apache-Test-1.03-dev$ >>> t/TEST -times=10 -order=random
*** setting ulimit to allow core fi
Hi there,
On Wed, 18 Jun 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Thus without re-compiling my whole Perl 5.8.0 build I need to come
> up with a solution.
I really don't see why you don't recompile your Perl. It's not a big
deal and it's going to be a lot safer that way.
> Sorry for my ignorance but it
Hi there,
On Wed, 18 Jun 2003, Trevor Phillips wrote:
> Whether it's i686 or i386 - both mod_perl and FastCGI are using the same
> compile of perl - so what difference should there be?
Must have got my wires crossed somewhere - I thought you must be using
different Perls.
73,
Ged.
Hi there,
On Tue, 17 Jun 2003, Trevor Phillips wrote:
[snip]
> The speed problem is not a connect time problem - it's actual run-time of the
> Perl code.
[snip]
> The only common thing between all the systems with the problem is they're
> using the i686 Debian package for mod_perl.
Do you know
Hi there,
On Mon, 16 Jun 2003, Mithun Bhattacharya wrote:
[snip]
> RedHat 7.3 has the notorious gcc 2.96 - no body has been able to
> figure out whether it is actually broken or not I guess :).
[snip]
Whether it's broken or not it was never released, it escaped. :)
The developers called it a de
Hi There,
On 16 Jun 2003, Clinton Gormley wrote:
> On Mon, 2003-06-16 at 13:03, Ged Haywood wrote:
>
> > > > I had a look at the memory usage of my apache/mod_perl 1 processes,
> > > > and was alarmed to find that only 3Mb of 25Mb processes was being
> > &
Hi there,
On Mon, 16 Jun 2003, Mithun Bhattacharya wrote:
> I have a choice between the very well tested 7.3 but highly likely
> to become unsupported by RedHat soon. Or I could go for RedHat 9.0
A distribution is just a package of stuff that you could put together
yourself if you had the time a
Hi there,
On 16 Jun 2003, Clinton Gormley wrote:
> > I had a look at the memory usage of my apache/mod_perl 1 processes,
> > and was alarmed to find that only 3Mb of 25Mb processes was being
> > shared (and that's straight after startup)
I see about the same on my own server when processes get b
Hi guys,
On Mon, 16 Jun 2003, Stas Bekman wrote:
[snip,snip]
> keys %hash;
>
> does the trick
>
> interesting that I don't remember this issue being reported earlier.
Probably because we all read the Camel Book, section 5.4.3, the bit
about FIRSTKEY. All except Randal that is... :)
Most peop
Hi there,
On Mon, 16 Jun 2003, Ryan Dietrich wrote:
> mod_perl on Solaris
Thanks for the tips!
> things ended up being ridiculously stable (they haven't rebooted since last
> February I'm told)..
Hehe:
www2:~$ >>> top -bn1 | head
9:57am up 421 days, 19:57, 1 user, load average: 0.03, 0
Hi there,
On Fri, 13 Jun 2003, Xavier Noria wrote:
> Hello, I've just compiled Apache 1.3.27 with mod_perl 1.27 from their
> tarballs on Solaris. perl is 5.8.0 packaged for Solaris.
>
> The installation of libapreq with cpan(1) stops here:
[snip]
> t/httpd -f `pwd`/t/httpd.conf
> /bin/sh: t/htt
Hi Slava,
On Sat, 14 Jun 2003, Slava Bizyayev wrote:
> So, what it looks like?
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/modperl/message/34174
> Looks like a moment of truth.
Yup. :)
73,
Ged.
Hi there,
On 9 Jun 2003, Philippe M. Chiasson wrote:
> Finally, the first mod_perl 1.28 release candidate #1 has arrived.
> [snip]
> Please give this release a spin
Linux 2.5.69, gcc 3.2.3, glibc 2.3.1, perl 5.8.0; 1300MHz Duron (x86).
All tests successful, 6 tests skipped.
Files=34, Tests=400,
Hi all,
On Fri, 13 Jun 2003, Slava Bizyayev wrote:
> We should together refrain from doing mistakes (at least publicly).
It is unrealistic (and perhaps a little Oriental?) to refuse to accept
that we make mistakes, and that we will continue to make them. It is
far more constructive to prepare f
nimum, and therefore the memory
> footprint very small?
Never had to worry about it a great deal, I usually just throw RAM or
boxes at it. Maybe you could have a look at Squid or something?
73,
Ged.
------
On Tue, 10 Jun 2003, G
Hi there,
On Tue, 10 Jun 2003, Forrest Aldrich wrote:
> I wonder if this will affect anything else, especially other
> things that require DSO support. ?
Have you got the Eagle Book? You need
--enable-module=so
in your configure arguments to put mod_so into Apache, mod_so allows
Apache to l
Hi Forrest,
On Tue, 10 Jun 2003, Forrest Aldrich wrote:
> "seems" to have worked
[snip]
> # /usr/apache/bin/httpd -l
> Compiled-in modules:
>http_core.c
>mod_so.c
>mod_dosevasive.c
>mod_perl.c
[snip]
:)
> building mod_perl is such a pain
[snip]
> thoughts on this one?
It isn't
Hi there,
On Tue, 10 Jun 2003, Forrest Aldrich wrote:
> The configure process goes through and shows that it's selected a DSO
> compilation, and that's not what I want so I just stopped it.
>
> The configure process complains about PERL_SSI and says it cannot include
> that with a DSO, etc. B
Hello there,
On Wed, 11 Jun 2003, Batara Kesuma wrote:
> Find Job! http://www.find-job.net is the biggest computer and internet
> related employment site in Japan.
> [snip]
> The speed improvement is significant, and the CPUs load
> average are lower than when we were running plain CGI.
Thank yo
Hello again,
On Mon, 9 Jun 2003, Forrest Aldrich wrote:
> Referring back to my original post, it with the options I specified, the
> compile process still insists on compiling mod_perl as a DSO. Even if I
> explicitly set USE_DSO=0 -- I wonder if one of the other flags (like
> EVERYTHING=1)
Hi there,
On Mon, 9 Jun 2003, Issac Goldstand wrote:
> Forwarded from the Israeli Perl Mongers mailing list:
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Ron" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 1:48 PM
> Subject: [Perl] HTML::Mason help anyone?
>
>
> > I
Hi there,
On Sun, 8 Jun 2003, Forrest Aldrich wrote:
> I want to try compiling mod_perl statically
What's the question?
73,
Ged.
Subject: Returned mail: see transcript for details
The original message was received at Sun, 8 Jun 2003 23:22:26 +0100
from IDENT:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [212.22.195.7]
- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
(reason: 553 5.3.0 Zone rejected due to abus
Hi there,
(Replying to off-list post just this once:}
On 6 Jun 2003, K Old wrote:
> Mandrake 9.0 (and several other linux distros) come out of the box with
> Perl 5.8.0 built with threads.
Ah. For some reason I was thinking you'd built the Perl yourself.
> I'm guessing that having Perl compil
Hi there,
On 6 Jun 2003, K Old wrote:
> No, I didn't build a threaded Perl, it seems to be the popular thing
> among any linux distro these days to build it with threads.
>
> I'll build a version without threads just to see if it works
Want to run that by me again??
> > I'm having trouble ge
Hi there,
On 5 Jun 2003, Dennis G. Allard wrote:
> Hmmm. No one has actually answered the question, although I am getting
> all kinds of advice... (-; ...
It's been good advice.
If the question to which you refer is the one in the subject line,
then one answer is look in the error log. Apach
Hi there,
On Wed, 4 Jun 2003, Dave wrote:
> I am having the exact same test failure results on openbsd
Did you build the Perl on that machine?
If not, it might be worth a shot.
73,
Ged.
Hi there,
On Tue, 3 Jun 2003, Henrique Pantarotto wrote:
> 3) downgrade apache to 1.3.27 and mod_perl to 1.27 and be happy
>
> Option 3 seems okay, excect for the fact that I am that kind of Linux
> user that is always upgrading everything to the latest version possible.
> This applies to linux
Hi guys,
On Mon, 2 Jun 2003, Stas Bekman wrote:
> > Sun Jun 01 18:51:42 2003] [notice] Apache/2.0.46 (Unix)
> > mod_perl/1.99_09 Perl/v5.8.0 mod_ssl/2.0.46 OpenSSL/0.9.6b
http://www.openssl.org/news/secadv_20030219.txt
73,
Ged.
Hi there,
On Sat, 31 May 2003, Ryan Farrington wrote:
> It was my assumption that apache allowed for the perl executable to be
> loaded into memory and called from then on without having to worry about
> creating the external process
Well that sort of sounds right, but instead of making assumpti
Hi there,
On Thu, 29 May 2003, Shashank Kailash Shringi wrote:
> I need one common entry for handlers in Location directive, both
> inside and outside virtual host.
I'm not sure I understand your problem, but I wonder if it's the sort
of thing that mod_macro could help you with?
73,
Ged.
Hi there,
On Fri, 30 May 2003, Forrest Aldrich wrote:
> how do you add/activate other modules to apache in this manner.
Here's one I prepared earlier. Use caution, this is an old one and I
haven't tested it lately. The documentation is in the Eagle Book, I
don't know if it's in the CookBook, m
Hi there,
On Thu, 29 May 2003, Steven M. Carter wrote:
There's a thread here:
http://www.geocrawler.com/archives/3/182/2000/2/0/3376687/
in which Doug MacEachern says:
"I don`t expect libapreq (or any of the Apache:: xs modules outside of
the mod_perl dist) to work under aix. it needs to poin
Hi there,
On Thu, 29 May 2003, Kirk Rogers wrote:
> i have a collection of perl modules ... i dont want to send it out
> without at least making it somewhat difficult for some hacker to just simply
> steal it and load it somewhere else without my consent.
This is getting to be an old chestnut,
Hi there,
On Thu, 29 May 2003, Igor Rojdestvenski wrote:
> designed a mod_perl handler moduel [snip]
> works fine first time, but when I refresh it, it works differently. [snip]
> My theory is that something is wrong with local/global variables [snip]
Check out the mod_perl Guide - you can find
Hi there,
On Wed, 28 May 2003, Perrin Harkins wrote:
> simran wrote:
[snip]
> > * Lookup the _distance_ for the planet _mercury_ on the date _1900-01-01_
[snip]
> you can get by with MLDBM or something similar.
You might also want to investigate using a compiled C Btree library which
could be t
Hi there,
On Wed, 28 May 2003, Angie Ahl wrote:
> I'm having a problem getting past the maketest stage installing libapreq-1.1 (to
> get Apache::Request), Apache 1 and Mod_Perl 1
If that's all that's holding up the installation, you'd probably get
away with installing manually and not doing the
On Thu, 27 Mar 2003, Johnson, Fred wrote:
> I haven't been successful building mod_perl with apache, and apacheSSL
> on a Solaris 2.8 with the latest recommended patches.
> I am working on a Solaris 2.8 machine, with gcc 2.95.3, perl v5.6.1,
> mod_perl-1.26, apache_1.3.22, and finally,
> apache_
Hi there,
On Fri, 7 Mar 2003, Michael Hyman wrote:
> I am not familiar with clustering
>
> Would you run a mod_perl based web site on a cluster?
If the performance and the money for the hardware are issues then
perhaps before you buy you should spend some time looking into things
like alter
1 - 100 of 488 matches
Mail list logo
