Another useless feature, then. Makes me think that the MZ-5n is a very good camera
(and it is).
All the best!
Raimo
Personal photography homepage at http://personal.inet.fi/private/raimo.korhonen
-Alkuperinen viesti-
Lhettj: Pl Jensen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Raimo wrote:
Absolutely useless
Tanya quoted Paul:
"I thought the Aussies amongst us may be interested to know that the C R =
Kennedy web site has a description of the MZ-S, nothing we don't already =
know, with the release date anticipated as July."
Did they say which year?
I wonder if NZ will ever see it.
Cheers,
-
Jim Brooks writes:
Isn't it odd then that the MZS has one?
I've found the RTF in the Z-1p useful when I left the big Sunpak at home. I
guess it would be very useful for contrast control, catchlights or whatever.
Cheers,
- Dave
David A. Mann, B.E.
email [EMAIL PROTECTED] *
Pål,
did you look at the Novoflex Makroblitzset at
http://www.novoflex.de/html/produkte.htm
It connects around the front lens, and this way it eleminates exposure
calculations for the flash.
So simple non TTL/AUTO flash units can be used.
George
- Original Message -
From: "Pål Jensen"
On Mon, 9 Apr 2001, William Kane wrote:
It's marked "ULTRA-MICRO-TAKUMAR 1:1.3 30mm". "ASAHI OPT. CO. JAPAN"
Anyone have any idea what this lens is for? It's got aperture setting
from 1.3 to 22, and has a screw mount on the rear of the lens that is
smaller than 42mm . . . maybe 37 or 39
...but remember that the standard back have controls for AF. I agree
though that 12-15 sems a bit too much for this use only. BTW doesn't the
bottom of the camera have 16 contacts?
Hmm... Not remember it :-(
And what for 12 contacts needed? Just for AF activation button?
---
Doesn't it seem
Hello
This is a Email I received from CdI and I wish to show to all of you !
See you
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Concernant les pentaxistes amricains !
-Amricains, franais ou javanais, les penxistes comme les contaxistes,
leicaistes et qqs autres commencent me courir sur le haricot, svre ! En
effet,
LOL!!
I have no idea what caused this outraged reply of his (I can imagine
though) but i *love* his style :-
Daphne
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at
On 10 Apr 2001, at 10:32, Pentax Clover wrote:
Hello
This is a Email I received from CdI and I wish to show to all of you !
See you
Where this augment falls down badly is that many of the people putting
comments forward in the PDML forum are also familiar with the other
systems to which
!
What's about English version?
:-)))
Den
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Hi all, well, I have had an incredibly busy past couple of days, I have been
shooting my butt off (no crass remarks, thanks! ;-) )
So I wanted to show you all what I have been up to. The following link will
take you to my "newest stuff" folder on Photo.net. The stuff shot this past
weekend
Martin Carro wrote:
Hi Peter, Let's see. You can assign Memory #1 to Supra 100, so
you write #1 in your Supra 100 roll.
Ok so before unloading your Supra 100 you note the frame counter and write
that on the film canister instead.
Then you have another roll, for example Tri-X, and
that goes
Qu?
E-MAILS are susceptible to interference. You should not assume that
the contents originated from the sender or the Zetex Group or that they
have been accurately reproduced from their original form.
Zetex accepts no
Hi Fairy,
Some beautiful pictures here. I particularly love the BW of the grouped
flowers, the flower toppling over in the vase, and the baby on the
cloud. (I guess I'm a softy.) Many other good shots as well. Nice work.
Paul
Tanya Russell Mayer wrote:
Hi all, well, I have had an incredibly
James,
All colour emulsions lose sensitivity due to natural radioactivity
and internal diffusion between layers. I hear the rate is somewhere
around half of stop each year, maybe more for faster films. It also
depends largely on the film.
Servus, Alin
James wrote:
JA A professional
My, Oh My ... someone's got his knickers in a knot. Seems like your
friend can't handle criticism very well (based on my poor French
translation) and, rather than argue technical points and specifics,
is just spewing forth what seems like anger and frustration. Too
bad - a good discussion could
Thanks Yves, your critique is largely deserved. Indeed I could have
used a smaller leaf to enhance composition. I do have a more open
view - unfortunately the frog eggs area was not big enough to cover
the entire background, besides that nature of the eggs would be then
hard to distinguish.
Denis wrote:
!
What's about English version?
:-)))
Heres a translation. As you can see this is a bunch of self centered, pretentios thick
heads. They avoid completely the isuue. No wonder!
Concerning the American pentaxists! - Americans, French or javanais, the penxists like
the
Kevin,
I can't speak on the FA20/2.8 or A20/2.8, but I do love the FA*24/2. It can
be pure magic in terms of picture quality. I remember sharpness and an
unanticipated dimensionality in the photos. It made me stop using my M28/2.8
as I couldn't stand it any longer.
The M20/4 is a nice
I remember seeing in a Pentax lens brochure from the
'70s an adapter which allowed the use of 'special'
macro lenses such as Zuiko Mplan(?) 21 mm for extreme
magnification on a bellows. Perhaps your lens is
similar to that one.
__
Do You Yahoo!?
on 4/9/01 1:05 AM, James Apilado at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You speak "treason" by saying you would let go 35mm vs. APS and MF. But let
me join you in that.
Hi Jim,
Treason? Well, yes, but I am still practicing the monogamy by not getting
into a heresy of buying one of these plasticky
Well, this idiot seems to acuse Pentax users for getting pissed off wherever CDI
publish a test that don't give pentax rave rewiev. Nothing could be further from the
truth. We get pissed off when lens test don't asess lens quality, good or bad. This
CDI thing started when some of us criticised
Hi,
I few weeks back there was a discussion on Nikon hoods to fit the Pentax
FA28-70/4, I think it was Shel. I was wondering what the part number was for
this hood? as I neglected to write it down at the time.
I assume the standard 52mm lense cap can be used with the hood?
Thanks,
Paul Jones
Ok, Peter, I didnt want to push you to use this method. I thought that it
was easier and economic than having something making holes or burning the
film.
The approach to write the number of roll instead of the frame, works better
if you use 18 frames of a roll and 20 days pass until your next
Just an idea:
Could the film manufacturers not put a magnetic 'sticker' on the outside
of 35mm film canisters. The camera could auto record read film info
like last used fram ISO override etc and use it for mid roll change etc.
If a film was loaded without the magnetic 'sticker' then obviously
auction says 'item no longer available FS' . and here I thought it would
reach incredible heights...
or perhaps a japanses collector made the seller an offer he couldnt
resist.
Daphne
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the
auction says 'item no longer available FS' . and here I thought it would
reach incredible heights...
or perhaps a japanse collector made the seller an offer he couldnt
resist.
Daphne
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the
I was wrong about Contax: No Contax SLR can remember the most recent frame
in a rewound roll. I was confusing this capability with the optional
Advanced Data Back D-8. The dtaback records exposure or date information
in-between freames, or can be set to store information and print this
Albano, Supra 200 doesn't exist. It comes in 100, 400, and 800. A typo?
Joe
Not a typo. A member told me "I love all Supra familiy. Specially 200 speed".
So, since members must choose just one I put him/her for Supra 200. I'm not a
film expert, and didn't knew it doesn't exist. I would love if
In regards to this;
"Hello
My translation is not good !!!
I just want to explain this after reading that some members are still
thinking that CdI Tests are not reliable
And after this mail, I think I will unsuscribe the pdml First, because I
will not have enought time to spend there and also I
Poor translation!
Concerning the American pentaxists! - Americans, French or javanais, the
penxists like the contaxists, leicaists and qqs others start to run me on
bean, severe! Indeed, which different newspaper than Ci, which different
journalists than my apple, Denis or GMC defended with
Hi,
Spotted the following advert in this week's British AP:
Verbatim:
PENTAX LX OUTFIT FA-1 Grip B OP-TECH strap. 24 f2.8, 28f2'A', 35f2'M',
50f1.4'M', 85f1.4A*, 135f2.5, 200f4'M' all in Tamrac pro bag and exc
condition several rare items will split 0141 357 5896
Paul Stenquist wrote;
"Hi Fairy,
Some beautiful pictures here. I particularly love the BW of the grouped
flowers, the flower toppling over in the vase, and the baby on the
cloud. (I guess I'm a softy.) Many other good shots as well. Nice work.
Paul"
Thanks for taking the time to view my pics
I must assume so, Peter. If anyone could have written it, Twain could.
By the way: Do you know what words are denoted by the acronym TWAIN,the
"universal" scanner interface? Technology Without An Interesting Name. I
kid you not.
"Peter Smith" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nis won Paul. Is xat rili
Hello
It was personnal E mail!
But some times you can read such thing in the magazine !
See you
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: "Norman Baugher" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: mardi 10 avril 2001 16:24
Subject: Re: Direct from Chasseur d'Images
Was that
Hello
I did a big mistake !
I may not have to translate the mail to you as it has been asked to
me(he do not wish his name and his words being deformed as it is already
happened !)
I am sorry and hope you will understand.
So if this is possible thank you for delete it.
At least, I try to make
-Original Message-
From: William Robb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 10 April 2001 15:30
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Film rewind with memory (WAS: Photo Expo Japan 2001 -
MZ-Sand FA31Ltd)
It would be easier for them to use the same sype of technology
as is used in APS, with a
There's one in a store here in Buenos Aires for about usd 1000 in supposed ex+
condition (I didn't inspected it because I will never have this money to spend
in just one lens). If somebody is interested I can give the phone number (don't
know them don't know if they are trustable).
-
This
Hello
does not matter americans or french, in France you can find such a
unbelievers !
See you
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For those of you keeping score at home, here is where we
stand:
A Scandinavian complained that a French magazine rated
some Pentax lenses too high and others too low, so in
on 4/10/01 11:09 AM, K.Takeshita at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
on 4/10/01 10:29 AM, William Robb at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
BTW, the APS system is extremely problematic. Considering the amount of RD
that went into it, I am surprised it is as bad as it is.
I never had any problem with the
These are the conditions:
1 - You must answer off-list, right to me.
2 - You must choose your favorite emulsion (35 and 120/220 allowed. Color and b
and w)
3 - You must choose ONLY ONE (color print OR slide OR b and w, etc).
4 - You must have personal experience with it.
WINNER by now: Kodak
These are the conditions:
1 - You must answer off-list exclusively. On-list votes will not be included.
2 - You must choose Your Favorite Pentax Lens. ONLY ONE. Yes, ONLY ONE.
3 - It must be original, no third-party allowed.
4 - Primes and zooms.
5 - You must specifiy: Tak, Super Tak, SMC Tak,
These are the conditions:
1 - You must answer off-list exclusively. On-list votes will not be included.
2 - You must choose Your Favorite Pentax Lens. ONLY ONE. Yes, ONLY ONE.
3 - It must be original, no third-party allowed.
4 - Primes and zooms.
5 - You must specifiy: Tak, Super Tak, SMC Tak,
Clover wrote:
By the way you demonstrate me something, being a pentaxist fan do not make
you smarter.
May be you prefer to stay in your own opinion, that is a choice I can
understand.
This is like bible, you may or not trust the reliable facts inside. But if
you come with the intention of
BOOO - Boring, boring, boring! :-)
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WINNER by now: Kodak Tri-X with 6 votes
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax
Just an FYI...
Tom C.
- Original Message -
From: "STD Listserver" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2001 6:13 AM
Subject: AURORA WARNING UPDATE: Mid-Latitude Auroral Activity Warning - 10
Apr
/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
Mark,
Look real close. Does it actually say "Aroma" or could it be "Aruma"?
Len
---
-Original Message-
From: Mark Roberts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2001 12:25 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: This filter stinks!
Just received a batch of lenses and
In actuality, anybody in the world that criticizes the French for anything,
is, by French definition, an American.
Len
---
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2001 10:27 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Direct from
A scroll of mail from Pl Jensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Tue, 10
Apr 2001 13:58:35 +0200
Read it? y
The Photodo tests of
the FA* 80-200 show it to be a rotten lens. Although I haven't used
it, has anyone heard anything but gloving reports from people with
personal experiences with this lens?
Mark Erickson wrote:
Camera World is showing the Pentax MZ-S.
I put one into a shopping cart and it came up with US $929.
It also says "Call for availability". I did, and they say
it should be in stock in two or three weeks. We'll see.
BH, of course, are shut down for the next week -
"Jan van Wijk" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just a quick question, I saw a private-add offering this lens, no price
mentioned.
Before calling, I would like to know what they usualy go for ...
Jan,
"Reasonable price for A* 1.8 135mm lens" is the oxymoron to end all
oxymorons. The last two to be
dave o'brien wrote:
A scroll of mail from Pl Jensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Tue, 10
Apr 2001 13:58:35 +0200
Read it? y
The Photodo tests of
the FA* 80-200 show it to be a rotten lens. Although I haven't used
it, has anyone heard anything but gloving reports from people with
personal
"Paris, Leonard" wrote:
In actuality, anybody in the world that criticizes the French for anything,
is, by French definition, an American.
Or, possibly, English. But in either case they are, of course, wrong.
--
John Francis [EMAIL PROTECTED] Silicon Graphics, Inc.
(650)933-8295
Why don't we just wait until the MZ-S starts shipping?
Then we'll *KNOW* what technique it uses for rewind memory.
--
John Francis [EMAIL PROTECTED] Silicon Graphics, Inc.
(650)933-82952011 N. Shoreline Blvd. MS 43U-991
(650)932-0828 (Fax)
Want to cry? In 1986, the 135/1.8A* was being advertised by Cambridge
Camera Exchange for $299.
Of course, that's before, "Sir, would you like glass with that? And a
focusing ring? And..."
Paul Franklin Stregevsky
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To
This is the situation,
I won a couple of K mount lenses on a Spanish auction
site. One is a M50/1.7 an the other is a
XR Rikenon zoom 1/3.5 70-150 Macro (heavy lens by the
way, manual focus as well).
The 50 is in excellent condition and I already paid
it. However, there seems to be some kind of
800-speed APS film is quite new, isn't it? Like two months old? Perhaps it
requires its own processing channel and all labs will have to learn with
experience.
In my view, the arrival of 800-speed APS film breathes new life into the
format, especially for available-light fans. But only if you
When Popular Photography's Herb Keppler was a young man starting out in
photography, he was apprenticing for a well-known German photographer--the
name escapes me--who had moved to America. Keppler had just read about a
new lens, that used a new design, and went on to describe its optical
Hello
Please remind that my test is not reliable. (I do not own 2 Millions
FrenchFrancs tools to mesure it, but each time CdI test a lens and even the
TRade disagree the result, when trade's engineers come to CdI resort, to
test by their own, you know the result it quite the same)
Even if I
Hi Jaume,
While I have 4 Ricoh bodies, and some Ricoh lenses,
the one you're looking at I am not familiar with, but
here are my thoughts: (1) If you truly do have a
non-functioning aperature send it back...there are
just too many "good" K-mount lenses out there that
will do the job without the
I agree with this quotation, but do not forget we are talking about reliable
tests or not. My own expenrience is that Pentax 50mm f::1.7 is better than
Minolta or Canon one (I used to own all 3) But I always prefer the Pentax
one.
For the 85mm, I tested it in order to help my friends. By my own
Regarding the
Pentax nozzle
this sounds pretty cool - anyone know if they've reached decent
secondhand prices yet, let alone new?? Always on the lookout
;-)
Cotty
___
Personal email traffic to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MacAds traffic to [EMAIL
John wrote:
Why don't we just wait until the MZ-S starts shipping?
Then we'll *KNOW* what technique it uses for rewind memory.
I think we do. You dial in the frame number and camera goes there.
Pl
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to
In a message dated 10/04/01 15:02:08 GMT Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Subject: Reasonable price for A* 1.8 135mm lens
Just a quick question, I saw a private-add offering this lens, no price
mentioned.
Before calling, I would like to know what they usualy go for ...
Jan.
James Adams wrote:
Surely as a working pro photographer you can write off a new camera or
lenses against taxes? There must be some sort of allowance!
There is (or at least you get to buy it with pre-tax dollars). But that
money has to come from somewhere. If you don't spend it on a new
Pentax clover wrote:
Please remind that my test is not reliable. (I do not own 2 Millions
FrenchFrancs tools to mesure it, but each time CdI test a lens and even the
TRade disagree the result, when trade's engineers come to CdI resort, to
test by their own, you know the result it quite the
John Mustarde wrote:
The problem is the high cost of being an "early adopter" of new
technology. Those who adopt a new technology early in its life cycle
pay through the nose for the privilege. I have resolved never again to
pay huge prices just to get the newest toys first.
That's why
Cyril wrote:
Some lens definition tests can reduce the subjectivity factor. One of them
consists in evaluating the ratio between 2 measurements taken by the same
instrument : the same instrument measures the contrast of a source image and
the one of a the same image through the lens on test.
Hi Rob,
So when you say you "compromise between the fire and the subjects"
I assume that you metered off both and then picked setting between them?
Thanks
Hi,
From: "Rob Studdert" Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Fire photography Date: Wed, 11 Apr
2001 08:54:07
Paul:
Unrecorded PDML contributor, who had run his own tests: "A* 135/1.8: F:1.8:
Not particularly sharp. Slight light fall-off at the corners. F: 2.8:
Strange results. Left part of the image unsharp; right side sharp. Don't
know what happened here. F:4: Sharp. F:5.6: Very sharp. F:8:
Cyril wrote:
Some lens definition tests can reduce the subjectivity factor.
BTW When we're at it; did they test the FA* 85/1.4 (or any other lens) at various
focus distances? If not, why? Isn't the decision of testing a lens, even if its just
MTF, at a fixed focusing distance a subjective
On 10 Apr 2001, at 18:56, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Paul Stregevsky wrote:
The Vivitar is said to be very sharp even wide open...a claim that even
the
SMC 135/1.8A* cannot make.
Rob Studdert" [EMAIL PROTECTED] replied:
This lens is sharp wide open and more importantly it is
Hey Folks,
Thanks for the comments on fire photography.
Let me clarify my questionfire is a rapidly moving, flickering subject
and, like a waterfall, I expect the appearance of it in a photograph
depends heavily on the exposure used. I was wondering if there was some
canonical rule, like
On 11 Apr 2001, at 9:22, Paul Jones wrote:
Hi Rob,
So when you say you "compromise between the fire and the subjects"
I assume that you metered off both and then picked setting between them?
Hi Paul,
Yep, the setting that I used would have put the main subjects illuminated by
the fire
John,
Agreed. If they were planning to release a model on the level of the D30/D1
with similar price range, I would definitely consider it.
Would I pay 4-6 times the cost of my pocket digital camera (Coolpix 880) to
be able to use my set of lenses? Definitely yes! 8-10x? I would have to
Firstly, thanks Doug for the link and for taking the time to make such a
detailed response to my questions.
There are some cute ideas on that web page, however, I differ slightly with
my view of how to shoot kids than these guys do, as I am planning to only
shoot children with available light
I have taken a few pictures with fire in them but was not recording
exposures. However, as you alluded to, I'd in general follow the same rule
of thumb I do with a waterfall. You don't start seeing too much blur until
you get around 1/8 sec. I'd expect, I could be wrong, that 1/60 and above
http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=1229172932
I've never seen one part of this before.
It's a finder with a "K" mount on it.
Is this to allow using a lens like a "macro"
for precise focusing? Interesting...
Collin
***
Data Processing Consultation, Inc.
On 10 Apr 2001, at 19:54, Collin Brendemuehl wrote:
http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=1229172932
I've never seen one part of this before.
It's a finder with a "K" mount on it.
Is this to allow using a lens like a "macro"
for precise focusing? Interesting...
Hi
Fairy wrote:
My first love is fashion, however, lack of
resources and also lack of a qualified teacher is very impeding where
fashion is concerned, so I may have to just resign myself to viewing all
of
the pretty models in the pretty dresses in the expensive magazines...
fairy.
Ya got a
Tanya Russell Mayer wrote:
I have decided at this stage to charge au$200 per session . . .
I do not put a "limit" on my shooting time, . . .
In doing it this way, my costs are about au$20 for film, au$90 for
processing. I will make about au$100 per shoot . . .
Sounds pretty darn cheap
Collin,
I'm not quite an expert on these things yet, but that looks alot like
the FB-1 finder . . . I think. It's supposed to have a bayonet mount
locking system for it's 3 (or 4) finders.
Illinois Bill
Collin Brendemuehl wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "Tanya Russell Mayer
Subject: Fairy pics
description of photographers hell deleted
I will make about au$100 per shoot
I think you are selling yourself WAY to cheaply.
You should be charging that much per hour, not per shoot.
William Robb
-
This message
Paul Stregevsky wrote:
"Close focusing distances for various K-mount 135s:
Vivitar 135/2.8 CF: 1.7 feet (CF = Close Focus)
Pentax 135/2.8F,FA: 2.3 feet
Vivitar 135/2.3: 3 feet
Pentax 135/2.8A: 3.9 feet
Pentax 135/1.8A*:4 feet
Pentax 135/2.5K: 5 feet
Pentax
- Original Message -
From: "Rob Brigham" Subject: RE: Film rewind with memory (WAS:
Photo Expo Japan 2001 - MZ-Sand FA31Ltd)
-Original Message-
From: William Robb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 10 April 2001 15:30
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Film rewind with
Is this where it stands: "CDI measures accurately, but the value of what's
measured doesn't support the conclusions they draw?'
Anyone know the specifics of what CDI tests for?
Dan Scott (out of the loop)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
- Original Message -
From: "K.Takeshita" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: April 10, 2001 9:09 AM
Subject: Re: Film rewind with memory (WAS: Photo Expo Japan
2001 - MZ-SandFA31Ltd)
on 4/10/01 10:29 AM, William Robb at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
BTW, the APS system is
On Tue, 10 Apr 2001 13:25:44 +0200, you wrote:
Heres a translation.
Well that runs me on bean, indeed, too!
They have decided that any criticism of their criticism is unfounded,
unwarranted, without merit, and unthinkably wrong.
Nay, even a besmirching of their honor!
Those who hold fast
- Original Message -
From: "Tanya Russell Mayer"
Subject: Subject: RE: Vivitar Series 1 28mm/f2
I am very glad that I "stumbled" across this little
"community" and expect to be around for some time to come
:-)
We can offer you a bit more entertainement value as well.
By
That's ok. We don't hold a grudge. The next time the "greatest army in
Europe" is quickly overrun by some power hungry wannabe dictator, The Yanks,
Brits, Canucks, Aussies, Ruskies as well as the underground of many other
noble countries will beat the invaders back for them, make the world safe
John Francis wrote:
Tanya wrote:
I have decided at this stage to charge au$200 per session . . .
I do not put a "limit" on my shooting time, . . .
In doing it this way, my costs are about au$20 for film, au$90 for
processing. I will make about au$100 per shoot . . .
Sounds pretty
- Original Message -
From: "K.Takeshita"
Subject: Re: Film rewind with memory
on 4/10/01 11:09 AM, K.Takeshita at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
on 4/10/01 10:29 AM, William Robb at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
BTW, the APS system is extremely problematic. Considering
the amount of RD
Hi Bill, Collin,
That`s it alright, the FB1 System Finder. That along with the FC-1 is the
best
thing since sliced bread!
Steve Larson
Redondo Beach, California
- Original Message -
From: "Bill Kane" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2001 5:23 PM
Subject:
I think my wife must be behind this.
Anyway, why would I want to take pictures that look just like all the other pictures
that are winning contests. Just think what all those winners could do with the lenses
I envy. We'll have to wait to find out because I was envying the FA 20/2.8 but now
On Tue, 10 Apr 2001 11:21:38 -0500, you wrote:
In actuality, anybody in the world that criticizes the French for anything,
is, by French definition, an American.
America - a country which the French helped create, many long years
ago, and which became a bunch of obnoxious ingrates who had the
Collin,
That's not a 'K' mount. That an F1-B finder base. It goes with the F1-C
viewfinder to make the action fined. See Boz's site. There are several more
ends that can be mounted on the NOT 'K' mount end.
Regards, Bob S.
I chimed in at the time... The one I bought for mine is an HN-2 for a Nikon
28mm lens and one of their 28-something zooms. It seems to help and does not
viginette, but I haven't used Shel's filter stack test. No, it does not
allow the use of the lens cap, as it has no threads on the outer edge. I
Hey Shel,
Have you a hood on your list that could work with the SMC F 70-210? Just
picked one up from KEH last week. Haven't found a hood yet, and I would like
to get one that doesn't make it look like a plunger ala the 80-320 ;))
l8r,
Douglas E Harmon
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hey Doug ...
What is the filter thread diameter of the lens?
Douglas E Harmon wrote:
Hey Shel,
Have you a hood on your list that could work with the SMC F 70-210? Just
picked one up from KEH last week. Haven't found a hood yet, and I would like
to get one that doesn't make it look
on 4/10/01 9:24 PM, William Robb at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
BTW, the APS system is extremely problematic. Considering the amount of RD
that went into it, I am surprised it is as bad as it is.
Hi Bill,
It seems you do have bad experiences and observations on the APS system.
snip Could
1 - 100 of 111 matches
Mail list logo
