Rule-shaving??? Honestly??? The rule is as clear as day. Pre-1990
Ping irons are currently legal for play, just like all the new OEM irons
are, and have been for the last 20 years or more. The rule is
absolutely clear here. The rule may be stupid, but it is not in the
least ambiguous or
Yeas, all those pros moving boulders with the help of the gallery
(Tiger), taking line of sight relief in order to get preferable lies
(Els and others), smoothing the ground behind their ball in waste areas
(Cink), entire fields playing lift, clean and place, etc... should
really have a problem
So this will fit any club with a standard hosel (0.335)? What about
0.350 hosels?
Tedd
-Original Message-
From: owner-shopt...@mail.msen.com [mailto:owner-shopt...@mail.msen.com]
On Behalf Of Don M
Sent: Thursday, January 21, 2010 2:53 PM
To: ShopTalk@mail.msen.com
Subject: Re:
From: owner-shopt...@mail.msen.com
[mailto:owner-shopt...@mail.msen.com] On Behalf Of Allen Humphrey
Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2009 2:05 PM
To: ShopTalk@mail.msen.com
Subject: Re: ShopTalk: Shaft extensions?
I disagree with respect to Ping irons on loft and lie. If their numbers
don't match yours, it is more likely a LL equipment difference than an
inaccurate setting from Ping. I have seen their LL measuring
equipment, and it is a computerized laser set-up to measure loft and
lie. It is likely more
FYI, gimmees or conceded putts/holes are perfectly legal in match play, and
those rounds are required to be posted for handicap purposes. The handicap
system has specific rules for match play and conceded putts/holes, stating that
the most likely score is to be posted for any conceded hole.
Did you send the e-mail from work? They can track every e-mail you
send... even if it is from your personal yahoo account.
Tedd
From: owner-shopt...@mail.msen.com
[mailto:owner-shopt...@mail.msen.com] On Behalf Of Robert Devino
Sent: Monday,
Golf shafts are not made of stainless steel.
Tedd
From: owner-shopt...@mail.msen.com
[mailto:owner-shopt...@mail.msen.com] On Behalf Of Brad Smith
Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2009 1:36 PM
To: ShopTalk@mail.msen.com
Subject: Re:
Not enough info on that particular shaft to know for sure, but at that
length, I would likely go with the S flex (especially considering that
you are playing a S flex in your 46 driver). A 200 gram head at 48
will likely be in the E swingweight range somewhere
Tedd
-Original
What frequency meter are you using? Could be a function of how well the
shaft is clamped at 2.5 vs. 5 clamp length. The possibility of wobble
at 2.5 clamp length goes up significantly as the shaft gets stiffer and
oscillates at a higher frequency.
Tedd
14252 Delano St.
Van Nuys, Ca. 91401
(818) 770-0475
From: Childers, Tedd A tedd.a.child...@pfizer.com
To: ShopTalk@mail.msen.com
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2008 5:18:10 AM
Subject: RE: ShopTalk: 7
That's pretty much exactly what I do, with the exception of weighting
the actual heads to whatever weight I need them to get my projected
swingweight (might be based on a 254g 5-iron in one set and a 260g
5-iron in another set).
Tedd
From:
(818) 770-0475
From: Childers, Tedd A tedd.a.child...@pfizer.com
To: ShopTalk@mail.msen.com
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2008 9:07:18 AM
Subject: RE: ShopTalk: 7-iron at 353 cpm - how?
I took
The frequency measurement instructions/methods on the original Brunswick
shafts were very precise, and to my understanding factory measurements
were always done with a 2.5 clamp on ungripped shafts and at a specific
clamping pressure. The commercially available Brunswick machine that
used to be
What are the specs on the Mach 22s (weight, bend point, profile maybe)?
Tedd
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2008 11:48 AM
To: ShopTalk@mail.msen.com
Subject: Re: ShopTalk: Precision
, 2008 12:47 PM
To: Childers, Tedd A
Subject: SMT Golf - Interchangeable Club Packages
smt golf logo
ringshttp://origin.ih.constantcontact.com/fs024/1101228340443/img/28.jp
g?a=1101979818977
Interchangeable Head/Shaft Packages
FAZFIT
Combinationshttp://origin.ih.constantcontact.com
On Feb 14, 2008, at 12:53 PM, Childers, Tedd A wrote:
Anybody care to comment on how this is better than an
OEM fitting cart fit? Looks like you just fit yourself, since everyone
knows their own needs better than any old club fitter does.
Tedd
Citgo stations in the US are NOT owned by Chavez, but are owned by local
businessman. They may sell gas provided by a Chavez-owned refinery,
which may be just as bad to some, but the stations themselves are
locally owned subsidiaries (like McDonalds stores). As for the rest of
the message, I'm
High launch, low spin is the key to long drives that roll out. Most
modern drivers (since around 2003) are designed for this, as are a lot
of newer balls.
Tedd
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of L. Hunter Kevil
John,
You can also use the top of a coffee can or some other type of plastic
container and then cut out the correct size hole. You need a metal tube
of the correct inside diameter to match the hosel ID.
Tedd
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On
and rattling, then that
is NOT what this is.)
I don't remember the brand. Maybe Charlie will chime in here.
How are you making your own hosel plugs? I missed that post. OK to
use as a cheapo tip on a resource page?
OK to do so.
At 09:57 AM 5/21/2007, Childers, Tedd A wrote:
John,
You can also use
Most likely the USGA will be sued and/or all clubs produced prior to
2009 will be legal until some further date, just like what was done when
the 0.830 COR rule was put into effect.
Tedd
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
EXCELLENT post John. I have not gotten into shaft profiling for this
very reason, as I have not seen enough data out there to convince me
that the profile is consistent from shaft to shaft on the same
brand/model of shaft. Quite a few people have profiled single shafts,
but no one (except Tim
I was tested too, and apparently I never release the club during the
downswing. Recommendation for me was the stiffest shaft possible,
which was around 320 CPM for the driver (Lloyd provided that shaft) and
for the irons, DG300 tipped to length (no butt trim). I hit the ball
straight with these
Title: Scotland Parts
Call the guy that manufactures/sells the MR3 True Blue
machine. I believe that he has parts for the Scotland.
Tedd
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2006 10:58
AMTo:
Is anyone interested in a Scotland loft/lie machine (lightly used, with
stand, and in good condition for $350 plus shipping) or a fully assembled
Neufinder 2 (like new condition for $150 plus shipping). If so, let me know, as
I am letting some of my clubmaking equipment go.
Tedd
Jim,
Depends on the cost of the two, and how much you plan to
use the machine. The Mitchell is a better machine in my opinion (easier to
use, more accurate, easier to get parts for) and is designed for a professional
shop, but the Scotland will work fine for a hobbiest/low volume shop. In
Not a big fan of the Mitchell shaft pullers, as there are better units
out there for less money. The loft and lie machine is as good as any
other, and better than 99% of the others. The only one that may be as
good (due to lower price and ability to do irons and putters) is the MR3
True Blue.
Andre,
A flat line set produces the same frequency across the set, but I don't know if
that is necessarily the same flex. Precision (and many others) believe that
flex is a combination of frequency AND length, hence the sloped line for
matching a set. Shortening a club at either end (butt or
Did anyone notice that Harrington tried a similar shot out of the rough with a
fairway wood? What was strange, and Johnny Miller remarked about it several
times, is that Harrington would completely lift his left foot off of the ground
and replant it when he was hacking out of the rough, even
Apparently, it doesn't work very well.
Tedd
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Ed Reeder
Sent: Monday, June 19, 2006 3:53 PM
To: ShopTalk@mail.msen.com
Subject: ShopTalk: Vijay's Practice Device for Putting?
Does anyone know what the strange
You are getting sniped on Ebay, which is a program that you can get and that
lots of people use that will place a last second bid on an item that is just
above the highest bid. You can also use the Autobid feature on Ebay, which
will bid an item up to your maximum in the smallest increment
Bernie,
You are absolutely correct about the weight adjustable drivers, and Tom Wishon
has discussed this with regard to his weight adjustable driver. According to
Tom (I think this is correct), approximately 20+ grams of weight has to be
moved around to affect ballflight significantly, but
I collected classic blades for awhile, and here is my list of favorites (from a
looks and playability perspective):
1. 1969 Wilson Bullet Backs
2. 1971 Wilson Button Backs (tough to find a set with all the buttons)
3. 1976 Wilson Staff model (lower CG than the previous models so easiest to
I only
got 28 right. I missed Dwight D Eisenhower as the president born in Texas,
and 1992 as the year of the last amendment to the Constitution. BTW, not
all heads of city government are called Mayors anymore (some are City Managers),
and I'm not sure that all of them are even elected
Ralph,
Cotton works fine, and adds very little additional weight to the head. Make
sure you use real cotton balls, and not synthetic ones. Just determine the
desired insertion depth,. and then stuff cotton into the head until you are at
the desired depth. I've done this several times and it
Ti sports (www.titaniumsports.com) has both taper and parallel tip Ti shafts
for irons. They carry two models, the Tour and the Pro Tour. Not sure
which you need, or how/if you can tell the difference by looking at them.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
. At 100 mph that woud mean 11.5 yards.
llhack
[Original Message]
From: Childers, Tedd A [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ShopTalk@mail.msen.com
Date: 10/12/2005 4:34:08 PM
Subject: RE: ShopTalk: Wishon Short Driver Article
Lloyd,
I think Tom's point is that even with perfectly matched shafts
Apologies to the group for asking a personal
question on the forum, but I haven't heard from RK via his private
e-mail.
RK,
I was looking to upgrade my older model
Kennedy shaft puller by adding thenew shaft clamp. Can you let me
know if that is possible, and the cost to do so? Thanks.
Subject: RE: ShopTalk: Wishon Short Driver Article
At 04:08 PM 10/12/2005, Childers, Tedd A wrote:
Personally, I would
love to build a shorter driver, but ideally I could get a reasonable
swingweight (D2-D4) at 43.5-44 and with a very light shaft (60 grams).
This would require a heavier than normal
Lloyd,
I think Tom's point is that even with perfectly matched shafts, the shorter
driver is easier to hit on-center than the longer driver. This is PURELY a
function of length. Longer = more difficult to hit on-center. Now, your
point may be valid that a well matched shaft will make it easier
All,
As embarrassing as this is, I have to admit that after 10+ years of
clubmaking (as a hobbiest), I made a complete rookie error, TWICE Here
is my sad tale...
Last season, I decided to build a super 3-wood, as I was struggling to hit
my 45, 10* loft, Purefit driver. After checking around
Wishon quality is top notch, but I don't know if he has an iron with the
specific design traits you are looking for. The 752TC, 939 and 991 irons
all have 5-5.5mm offset in the 3-iron versus 4mm in the Snake Eyes Viper
Tour you currently have. The 550C only has 3.5mm in the 3-iron, but that is
a
Charlie,
I want
to try one before I buy one, which is why I was interested in the retail and/or
green grass availability. I could "mock" one up at home like some others
have done, but I would prefer to just try the real thing and see if it improves
my putting.
Tedd
-Original
John,
I agree with your assessment that OEM custom fitting and reduced OEM
pricing is not good news for a lot of custom clubmakers. I have said before
that I thought this rash of super high priced shafts, many of which are
available as stock and/or upgrade shafts in OEM clubs, is also an attempt
Charlie,
Will
the heavy putters only be available online, or do you eventually plan to offer
them at green grass and/or retail locations?
Tedd
-Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Friday, February 11, 2005
All,
Just got the new Golfworks catalog last night, and I think I'll load up on
those new Mitsubishi graphite shafts at $300/each They should fly out
the door at that price. Why does Maltby even bother to offer these things?
Will anybody who is buying a $100 Titanium component driver head
John,
I'll take a dozen (ha ha ha)! You think the shaft will help me out (12
handicapper with a 90-95 MPH swingspeed). If it can guarantee me 270+ yard
drives in the fairway 90+%, I might buy one.
Tedd
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Message -
From: Childers, Tedd A [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ShopTalk@mail.msen.com
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 05, 2005 12:26 PM
Subject: ShopTalk: Titanium shafts
Anyone have any experience with TiSports titanium wood shafts? I am
thinking about trying one
Steve's reply from FGI:
First off the insert depth is at 2 1/2...I did this to reduce head torque
at impact as I personally believe it works better with the FAS (Flow
Alignment System) design of my club!
It really should not stiffen up a shft that much unless it is tip stiff
re-inforced! If you
handicapper may
benfit by the accuracy a shorter club length could bring to their longer
irons.
Interesting idea, But maybe I'm just to old of a dog to accept.
--TCM GOLF
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Original message from "Childers, Tedd A" [EMAIL
Alan,
I think that the concept for single length would apply separately for irons
and woods. Can you re-run the numbers using say a 42 club length for woods
with a 100 MPH swingspeed (I guess head weight would be around 220 grams).
I think the target weight is closer to 266 grams for these
Connie,
http://www.freegolfinfo.com/
Go to
the General Equipment Discussion. You have to sign up (free) in order to
post.
Tedd
-Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Connie Mack
ReaSent: Tuesday, January 04, 2005 7:35 PMTo:
Alan,
The only problem I see with a single length complete set is that the length
of the clubs would have to be closer to 38-40 to accommodate a 240g head
weight (as you suggest below), IF you want to obtain a somewhat traditional
swingweight (C8-D2 range). At that length, you are starting to
Anyone have any experience with TiSports titanium wood shafts? I am
thinking about trying one of these in my driver (Bang-O-Matic 401cc), as the
extra weight will help me to achieve my preferred swingweight (D2-D4) at 44
length, without adding a lot of weight to the head. The main concern I
expect them to
play.
Bernie
Write to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: Childers, Tedd A [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ShopTalk@mail.msen.com
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 05, 2005 12:26 PM
Subject: ShopTalk: Titanium shafts
Anyone have any experience with TiSports
All,
There
has been a pretty good discussion going on at FGI about single
lengthirons, and I am starting to think this might be a really good idea
formid-high handicap golfers. The positives aremany for a
single length set of clubs: same swing plane for all irons, single frequency for
all
Alan,
Check
out SMT, Bang, and Wishon (all available through John at
Shoptalk). I would also recommend that you look at Alpha and Ashton.
SMT and Bang probably have the biggest selection of head sizes and lofts
available. I am currently playing a 401cc Bang-o-matic at 13* (spec was
14*).
TFlan,
With a driver
clubhead speed of 90 MPH, his carry with a driverwill only be around
195-200 yards, with a total distance of around 220-230 (assumingaverage
roll). Looks like he needs more launch angle to maximize his carry, but he
can't expect to be pounding out 250+ yard drives with
TFlan,
Most of the high loft Bang heads do not indicate the loft (they say HL
instead). I am using the Slupski 401cc BOM (14* spec loft, 13* actual loft)
with a SK Fiber TT80 R-flex shaft at 44 with good success. My swingspeed
is around 95 MPH. I switched to the BOM from a 400cc, 11*, PureFit
Pat,
What you are saying makes sense to me intuitively, but it can only affect
the impact for the very brief time of the collision (measured in thousandths
of a second probably). If the clubhead is still accelerating at the
beginning of the impact (vs. decelerating and/or constant), then it
Graham,
Does
the face actually need to be flat, or just appear to be flat?
Irecently assembled a Bang Golf Bang-o-matic 401cc head for myself, and
the face on this club appears quite flat to my eye. Not sure of the actual
bulge and roll specs on the head, but it has less obvious bulge and
less bulge based on the +/- tolerance that would come along with any
driver in production, but
generally that tolerance is not usually any more than +/- 1.
TOM
-Original
Message-From: Childers,
Tedd A [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 31,
2004 5:
:
Because bulge and
roll are both a radius, that means the smaller the number of the radius, the
more curved it will be. Hence a 10 bulge will look more curved than
will a 12 and so on.
TOM
-Original
Message-From: Childers,
Tedd A [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent
All,
I've
been off Shoptalk for a while now due to a job related relocation, but am
hopefully successfully re-subscribed now. Anyway, I have a question for
everyone about custom clubmaking and fitting. In general, which level of
golfer do you feel gets the most benefit from custom clubs
John,
I am interested in buying a Bang Golf Maxwell Curve driver head (RH, 10.5*),
but did not see the price listed on the Clubmaker Online site. Can you
provide me with that info? Thanks.
Tedd
LEGAL NOTICE
Unless expressly stated otherwise, this message is confidential and may be
Greg,
The device Corey designed finds the residual bend in steel shafts (and
possibly graphite), but I don't believe it will measure the roundness of the
shaft (i.e. cross sectional variability of the shaft tube itself, if that's
what you want).
Tedd
-Original Message-
From: Greg
All,
Response from Tom W. regarding the Series 5 steel shafts, in case anyone
else orders them and wonders about the differences from the catalog specs.
Tedd
The Series 5 shafts were supposed to be a raw length of 40 - that was
the raw length I was getting on all of the prototypes all through
All,
A quick report on the new Wishon 752TC irons I just built. Initially, I was
hesitant about the 8mm wide topline specification, but after receiving the
irons, the topline does not appear to be that wide. It is clearly wider
than most player's cavities, which are probably 3-5mm, but not so
All,
I'm having a brain freeze here trying to recall the graphite shafts that
John K. and others have found to be so consistent as to be nearly
spineless. This has been discussed several times on the forum, but I
can't find any of those threads at the moment. Can someone please help me
jog my
John,
Can you provide us with the grip weights of the various styles? The web
site says weights are +/- 0.5 grams, but the site does not list the actual
weights of the different grip styles. Thanks.
Tedd
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
Thanks!!!
Tedd
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 2:46 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: ShopTalk: Grip Science-Star Grips
Tedd:
Just spent about 8 hours working on the pages, thought to myself,
Self, there's
Ralph,
I have
a couple of setsof the cavities, and the weights are very well matched
(+/- 2 grams across the set). However, they are all slightly heavier than
"standard", with the 5-iron at 262 grams. If you are interested in a
set (3-PW) , contact me by private e-mail and we can discuss.
Shay,
Let me take a crack at answering your question. First, you are making an
assumption that is not necessarily accurate, which is that a 5-wood is the
next logical club in a set after a 3-iron. That may be the case with most
modern sets (which also tend to have 3-4 wedges) , but
Have
to agree with Cub on this one. I went out of town on a business trip and
didn't take my clubs, and ended up having time to play a round, so I rented some
clubs at the course. They let me use a demo C4 driver and Steelheadf
airway woods, as the woods in the rental set were pretty
Sean,
As a hobbyist like Bernie, I don't feel that I need to price my clubs at any
certain level to protect the professional clubmaker. There is one simple
reason, which is that my customers are not planning on buying from anyone
else anyway. If they don't get the clubs from me, they will
All,
My take on cheap components has very little to do with the price. The
difference between the most expensive component iron(cast, 431 for example)
and the least expensive is maybe $5/head. The range is higher in drivers,
but again we are talking a range of maybe $60-100 for a Ti head. What
All,
I am
also just a hobbyist, and see nothing wrong with any of the scenarios below,
except#4. In my mind, all of the other scenarios are fine, as your
main intent is to hit balls on the range with your own clubs, but scenario #4
seems a bit too much like advertising to me. If someone
As a
hobbyist, I have never actually had a demand for "clones". I have been
able to convince all of my friends/customers that performance is more important
than appearance, and that the quality is generally better with non-clone
clubs. I have generally ordered from GS, Dynacraft, Chicago
Tom,
Congratulations on your new business venture, and best of luck!!! I have
always appreciated your honesty and openness in sharing information about
the clubmaking business, when you were at GS and after you left. You were
also extremely helpful to me personally on a couple of items I
Bob,
I
agree that he should have mixed-up the order a bit and not have had Mickelson
and Tiger in the last two groups. The way it worked out, both matches
weremeaningless, as the cup was decided before Phil and Tiger even
finished. I doubt that Montgomerie would have beaten Tiger so
Ed,
Agree
with Mac that CPMs are CPMs, regardless of shaft type. However, the real
issue is playability of different shafts at a given frequency, and that can vary
greatly based on the factors that Mac mentions below. The DSFI and RSSR
systems were developed to try and describe how certain
Tour Cavity Pro...just didn't go far enough for me.
Bernie
Writeto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: Childers, Tedd A [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 8:36 AM
Subject: ShopTalk: NearNet heads, also search for PW head
All,
I'm looking
with.
Dan Neubecker
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Childers, Tedd A [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 7:36 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: ShopTalk: NearNet heads, also search for PW head
All,
I'm looking for an original GS Tour Cavity
Lloyd,
Miscalculated the clamp adjusted frequencies by adding 3 CPM to your
numbers, when I should have added to my numbers. That means my clubs are
all stiffer than your recommendations by about 5-6 CPM on the long irons to
around 10 CPM on the PW. However, my woods are all still
Lloyd,
I estimate that the 5 clamp length would add about 2-4 CPM to the readings
I get at a 4.5 clamp length. Using a correction of 3 CPM per club, all of
the irons are pretty much right on the money, or at least within 4 CPM down
to the PW (297.3 vs. 298). BTW, I tried softer shafts in the
Peter,
You
are incorrect in your understanding of frequency as it is related to golf club
making. The frequency one measures for a golf club using a frequency
analyzer is NOT the resonance frequency of the shaft, but is rather a measure of
the time it takes the shaft to complete one
PROTECTED]Subject: Re: ShopTalk:
History of Frequency
Comments Below ***
llhack
- Original Message -
From:
Childers, Tedd A
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 10:00
AM
Subject: RE: ShopTalk: History of
Frequency
Peter
I
agree that it would be nice if Shoptalk posters would take the time
tore-read and perform a spell-check on theire-mails prior to
posting. However, the main function of this forum is to exchange ideas and
experiences related to clubmaking. A very high percentage of
themessages do that
Cub,
I have been playing a set of Golfsmith Tour Cavity irons on Dynamic shafts
at a 2 CPM/club slope for about 3-4 years now, and have been very happy with
them. The reason I went to this set-up is a s follows.
I was working at a golf range, and the clubmaker/head pro there was a big
Mike and Cub,
As a follow up to my last post regarding my current 2 CPM/club set-up, I
wanted to echo your thoughts on this subject. That same clubmaker that I
worked with in North Carolina had developed conversion charts for all the
shafts he worked with. All of his steel shafted demo clubs
Cub,
Tough to get the swingweights the same or close to the same on a set with
all the clubs the same length. Also, the distance gaps between clubs gets
much closer, since the only difference is in face loft, not loft and length.
However, a flat-line frequency would make the most sense on a set
Pat,
No
reason to get all worked up about this subject. Play what you want to
play, but don't make asinine statements like; "I'm convinced
that it's gonna be higher in almost every blade compared to EVERY cavity -
blades have a much longer hosel and a waaay thinner sole than cavities, both
93 matches
Mail list logo
