Re: Router IOS Upgrade bug in 12.1 images [7:52489]

2003-03-10 Thread The Long and Winding Road
Ran into this one again on a router I recently purchased. In searching the archives for the methodology, I realized I had not documented the procedure anyplace last time I ran into this last September of so. The bug: with versions of IOS 12.0, upgrade is impossible. Copy TFTP flash fails The

Re: Question on a particular ISDN simulator [7:64814]

2003-03-10 Thread The Long and Winding Road
Thanks to the folks who responded, and who have shared a number of files. I recently purchased the ISDN package from o..p..t..s..y..s.net - consists of 2x2503 routers and the B-link-2 ISDN sim. I checked prices versus what I was seeing on the auction site, and the price seemed reasonable all

Last topic for tonight - Soltie's Book [7:64882]

2003-03-10 Thread The Long and Winding Road
I've waffled on this one before. But lately I've been spending more time with Soltie ( CCIE Practical Studies, Volume 1 ) Previously, I've said the jury is still out on this one. Now that I've given Mr. Soltie his due, I am finding this is a very good book, and well worth considering when

Any w2k syslog server avaiable? [7:64883]

2003-03-10 Thread Richard Campbell
Hi.. I used to use unix syslog server to log the cisco device event. But there is no unix box in my new company. Only w2k. May I know is there any syslog software avaiable that I can install in W2k? Thanks _ Add photos to your

Re: Any w2k syslog server avaiable? [7:64883]

2003-03-10 Thread The Long and Winding Road
Richard Campbell wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi.. I used to use unix syslog server to log the cisco device event. But there is no unix box in my new company. Only w2k. May I know is there any syslog software avaiable that I can install in W2k? check out Beverly Hills Software -

RE: MAC Access Lists - Canonical or NonCanonical [7:64754]

2003-03-10 Thread Troy Leliard
I guess this would depend on the media / interface that you are applying the ACL to? EG for TR, you would use non-canonical, and if applying the address to ethernet interface canonical. Presumably, inbound packets from TR pass through any inbound ACL's, then get converted to canonical and passed

Re: Any w2k syslog server avaiable? [7:64883]

2003-03-10 Thread Victor Wibawa
This is for Windows: 1. Kiwi www.kiwisyslog.com/ 2. Solarwinds Syslog server www.solarwinds.net Personally I find kiwi is better... From: Richard Campbell Reply-To: Richard Campbell To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Any w2k syslog server avaiable? [7:64883] Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2003 09:00:02

Re: Last topic for tonight - Soltie's Book [7:64882]

2003-03-10 Thread Larry Letterman
Its Mr. Solie, Isn't it ? And I am in the middle of that book, in the Eigrp section, and I agree, I like it..I think its a good lab practice book..especially for someone thats just starting on the lab practice, like me...:) Larry Letterman Network Engineer Cisco Systems - Original Message

RE: CCSP track [7:64735]

2003-03-10 Thread Martin J.
i think order of taking tests isn't importent (maybe safe test should be last). i started last week with csvpn, next will do mcns so i get the vpn specialist . problem of ids is, who does isd and when doing, who does it with cisco ;-) tell if you hear other opinions. Message Posted at:

RE: Compression on 2610 routers [7:64702]

2003-03-10 Thread Martin J.
We have typical office-envirement: some word, excel, some host, web. HW-compression brings up to 9:1 (average, i thing 4-5:1). Take attention with SW, even a 72xx can't handle many of SW compressed links. Lupi is right. Before implementing you have to test. Ask your Cisco Provider for AIM Boards

RE: Any w2k syslog server avaiable? [7:64883]

2003-03-10 Thread dave petit
syslog,tftp,ftp 3COM windows utilities found here http://support.3com.com/software/utilities_for_windows_32_bit.htm -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Victor Wibawa Sent: Monday, March 10, 2003 4:53 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Any

ATM [7:64891]

2003-03-10 Thread Brian
All, A quick question if I may... See below the output from sh atm int atm x/x Router#sh atm int atm x/x Interface ATMx/x: AAL enabled: AAL5 , Maximum VCs: 4096, Current VCCs: 1 Maximum Transmit Channels: 0 Max. Datagram Size: 4528 PLIM Type: E3 - 34000Kbps, Framing is G.832/G.804, TX

DTP and VTP Domain [7:64892]

2003-03-10 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is VTP dependent of DTP or is DTP dependent of VTP?. From the following statement I think DTP can still form a trunk even if VTP domain is different on both switches. But I have read opposite statements. Unfortunatelly I can not test it now. Any thoughts? The VTP protocol communicates

RE: DTP and VTP Domain [7:64892]

2003-03-10 Thread alaerte Vidali
Found the answer on the same page. In desirable mode, DTP packets transfer the VTP domain name (which must match for a negotiated trunk to come up), plus trunk configuration and admin status. Thanks Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=64893t=64892

Sniffer on Catalyst 6509 [7:64894]

2003-03-10 Thread Eduardo Perestrelo
Hi, I have a Catalyst 6509 and need to sniff network. If possible enable one port to read all traffic to sniff ?! Thanks, Eduardo Perestrelo CCNA / CCAI Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=64894t=64894 -- FAQ,

RE: Last topic for tonight - Soltie's Book [7:64882]

2003-03-10 Thread Juan Blanco
Church, I had being eating, drinking, sleeping.Solie, Caslow, Halabi, Parkhurst, Doyle and others books as well for the last two months, and I came to the conclusion that Solie and Caslow book has the same foundation or I will say using the same techniques, both books are great to the point

RE: Any w2k syslog server available? [7:64883]

2003-03-10 Thread Juan Blanco
Kiwi...It is great.you can download a working version. www.kiwisyslog.com/ Juan Blanco -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Richard Campbell Sent: Monday, March 10, 2003 4:00 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Any w2k syslog server

RE: Sniffer on Catalyst 6509 [7:64894]

2003-03-10 Thread DeVoe, Charles (PKI)
You do this with the span command -Original Message- From: Eduardo Perestrelo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 10, 2003 7:44 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Sniffer on Catalyst 6509 [7:64894] Hi, I have a Catalyst 6509 and need to sniff network. If possible

??? MPLS ??? [7:64898]

2003-03-10 Thread Steven Aiello
Sorry for such a newbe question. But what is MPLS? And what is it? Any one have a link they can point me too? Just trying to learn more. Thanks, Steve Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=64898t=64898 -- FAQ, list

Re: ??? MPLS ??? [7:64898]

2003-03-10 Thread John Hutchison
Multiprotocol Label Switching. Can read up on it at Cisco or I believe, whatis.com has a little on it, as well. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=64899t=64898 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:

??? Etherchannel ??? [7:64900]

2003-03-10 Thread Steven Aiello
Ok please don't be annoyed I have another vocab question. I know what Ethernet is and I'm fairly sure fiberchannel is basically some sort of fiber line. What is Ether channel? And where is it commonly used. Any one have a good link? Thanks, Steve Message Posted at:

Re: ??? MPLS ??? [7:64898]

2003-03-10 Thread John Hutchison
I found this link to Cisco for MPLS. http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios120/120newft/120 limit/120s/120s5/mpls_te.htm Bon apetit! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=64901t=64898 -- FAQ, list

Re: ??? Etherchannel ??? [7:64900]

2003-03-10 Thread John Hutchison
The best place in my opinion for definitions and brief descriptions of this sort is http://www.whatis.com I don't believe I've ever not gotten an answer from there. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=64902t=64900 --

RE: SMTP Time outs and re-transmissions, multiple [7:64617]

2003-03-10 Thread alaerte Vidali
It would be nice if we could always return the last condition before the last action. But I rarely do that on production networks, because of the concerns in solve the problems as fast as possible. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=64903t=64617

Load Balancing and NAT [7:64904]

2003-03-10 Thread Terry Oldham
Hello all, I am attempting to setup a Cisco 1721 Router with load balancing and NAT so that we can provide a dual T1 connection to the network. This is the first time I have done anything like this and I was wanting to know if anyone had any good pointers they could give me or any commands

RE: Last topic for tonight - Soltie's Book [7:64882]

2003-03-10 Thread Logan, Harold
There are a few minor mistakes in Solie's book, but I have found it to be very useful. I didn't care for the scenarios at the end of his book, but the exercises that accompany each chapter are excellent exercises for a candidate to go through while getting ready for the lab. It's obvious that he

RE: Load Balancing and NAT [7:64904]

2003-03-10 Thread Troy Leliard
First big question, are your T1's from the same provider, or from a different provider, and thus different public ip address space? If it is from a different provider, you may well run into some problems with NAT. Say for example, client A connects to your webserver (via ISP A's public IP

Security News Groups [7:64907]

2003-03-10 Thread Steven Aiello
Hello all, I saw a post a little bit ago about security news groups. I'll ask again because I also have been looking for one. Any one know of a good security news group? If so please share. Steve Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=64907t=64907

RE: Last topic for tonight - Soltie's Book [7:64882]

2003-03-10 Thread Jim Brown
I bet I know which one is damaged. I would put money on the Caslow book. Mine fell apart at the binding in no time flat. Whoever bound the Caslow book did a very poor job. -Original Message- From: Juan Blanco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 10, 2003 5:53 AM To: [EMAIL

New Catalyst 2955 Switch [7:64909]

2003-03-10 Thread Kaminski, Shawn G
I'm sure many of you have already read about this new switch, but these are quite different looking than the normal Cisco switches I'm used to working with. Plus, I even had a dream last night about these silly things, so they were on my mind this morning. Cisco designed these basically for the

Re: Load Balancing and NAT [7:64904]

2003-03-10 Thread Terry Oldham
The T1's are from different providers, Qwest and Sprint. And no we will not be running BGP... Troy Leliard wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] First big question, are your T1's from the same provider, or from a different provider, and thus different public ip address space? If it is

RE: Network Design - What Priscilla did NOT cover in h [7:64842]

2003-03-10 Thread Don Kanicki
Should have proposed a carrier pidgeon based message system for the wan and soup cans connected with string for the in house phones. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=64911t=64842 -- FAQ, list archives, and

Re: Load Balancing and NAT [7:64904]

2003-03-10 Thread Amar KHELIFI
could u give us more info pls, as far as the IP's that you will be using. wasn't it u that wanted to assign 2 ip's for each server you have? if that is so,u can do the following: creat 2 VLAN's on ur switch. creat 2 subinterfaces on the router(must have fast ether) for the vlans. PBR every thing

??? 2 Default Gateways ??? [7:64913]

2003-03-10 Thread Steven Aiello
Hello all I was just wondering if you could have 2 Default gateways, using static routes? If so what would you do just enter the ip default route command twice? Also will the router auto detect if one of those routes goes down and pass traffic only to the active interface. I know you can do

Re: Load Balancing and NAT [7:64904]

2003-03-10 Thread Troy Leliard
Hi Terry, I think I have already responded to a similar, if not the same question. You wont be able to use NAT, as you can have a many-to-one NAT statement on your router. IE Qwest IP and Sprint IP, both NAT to the same server. The only way I can see you getting this working is if you get a

Re: ??? 2 Default Gateways ??? [7:64913]

2003-03-10 Thread John Neiberger
Hello all I was just wondering if you could have 2 Default gateways, using static routes? If so what would you do just enter the ip default route command twice? Also will the router auto detect if one of those routes goes down and pass traffic only to the active interface. I know you can do

Re: Load Balancing and NAT [7:64904]

2003-03-10 Thread Terry Oldham
More Info: FastEthernet Int0 172.16.100.2/24 Serial0144.228.52.114 255.255.255.252 Sprint IP Block 65.160.124.193 -65.160.124.222 Serial1 65.123.132.166 255.255.255.252 Qwest IP Block 65.120.161.161 - 65.120.161.190 Honestly I have bitten

Re: ??? 2 Default Gateways ??? [7:64913]

2003-03-10 Thread Amar KHELIFI
yes u can configure 2 default static routes, but it will not load balance, but it will provide redundancy. Steven Aiello a icrit dans le message de news: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hello all I was just wondering if you could have 2 Default gateways, using static routes? If so what would you do just

Re: ??? 2 Default Gateways ??? [7:64913]

2003-03-10 Thread Dave Jacoby
I don't think you can configure 2 default gateways. I think you can configure two gateways of last resort using floating static routes: ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 [destination address] [cost] i.e. ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 10.1.1.1 90 ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 10.1.2.1 80 It will always use the

Re: ??? 2 Default Gateways ??? [7:64913]

2003-03-10 Thread John Neiberger
This isn't necessarily true. It depends on your configuration and the source of the default routes. Take a look at the note at the bottom of the following page for details: http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/105/default.html Regards, John Amar KHELIFI 3/10/03 9:52:27 AM yes u can configure 2

RE: Security News Groups [7:64907]

2003-03-10 Thread Will Gragido
Check out www.infosyssec.com Steve, you'll find links to several there. Will Gragido CISSP CCNP CIPTSS CCDA MCP 9450 W. Bryn Mawr Ave. Suite 325 Rosemont, Il 60018 www.ins.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steven

Basic Frame Relay question [7:64923]

2003-03-10 Thread DeVoe, Charles (PKI)
I am looking at frame relay. As I understand it, the frame relay connection goes from the CPE to the service provider CO. My question is, does the destination device on the other side of the CO also need to run frame relay? Could they perhaps run ATM? My CPE CO

Re: Unexpected behavior of IGRP and EIGRP [7:64625]

2003-03-10 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
i can't figure out why u r using IGRP in R3, since obviously he would know about the routes. Regards, Amar. I was testing auto-summary with different protocols and I ended up in this configuration, before remove one of the protocols. actually it is Eigrp that has a better AD than Igrp, 90 and

Re: ??? 2 Default Gateways ??? [7:64913]

2003-03-10 Thread Amar KHELIFI
yes indeed as per the doc, it will load balance. i'll try it out. John Neiberger a icrit dans le message de news: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This isn't necessarily true. It depends on your configuration and the source of the default routes. Take a look at the note at the bottom of the following page

RE: Load Balancing and NAT [7:64904]

2003-03-10 Thread Logan, Harold
I have a question about this setup, but it's more deisgn-oriented than configuration. What's the benefit of having redundant ISPs if they both connect to one router? I realize that a WAN circuit is more likely to have problems than the router hardware is, but it seems like both the configuration

10 half or 100 full [7:64931]

2003-03-10 Thread Mike Momb
To all, We recently replaced our Nortel switches and routers with Cisco 2980 switches and 6509 routers. We have two buildings, 10 floors each and a router in each building. We have a combination of NT and Novell servers. After replacing all this equipment, we have noticed that when we access

Re: Load Balancing and NAT [7:64904]

2003-03-10 Thread Amar KHELIFI
that will work. every thing going out will overloaded. and an inverse NAT is done for the packets coming in. u will have controll over the traffic getting out, that is on a round robin fashion, one packet out se0 the next out se1. the traffic coming in the links will depend on the IP's u use on

Re: Basic Frame Relay question [7:64923]

2003-03-10 Thread Amar KHELIFI
yes there is an FRF8 and FRF5 standards that define that, as so: frf8 fr-CO-atm frf5 fr---ATM cloud--fr DeVoe, Charles (PKI) a icrit dans le message de news: [EMAIL PROTECTED] I am

Re: ??? Etherchannel ??? [7:64900]

2003-03-10 Thread Orest Umudumov
Hi Steve, that can help you: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk389/tk213/technologies_configuration_example09186a0080094958.shtml cheers, Orest Steven Aiello schrieb: Ok please don't be annoyed I have another vocab question. I know what Ethernet is and I'm fairly sure fiberchannel is

RE: 10 half or 100 full [7:64931]

2003-03-10 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
Mike Momb wrote: To all, We recently replaced our Nortel switches and routers with Cisco 2980 switches and 6509 routers. We have two buildings, 10 floors each and a router in each building. We have a combination of NT and Novell servers. After replacing all this equipment, we have

RE: Basic Frame Relay question [7:64923]

2003-03-10 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
DeVoe, Charles (PKI) wrote: I am looking at frame relay. As I understand it, the frame relay connection goes from the CPE to the service provider CO. My question is, does the destination device on the other side of the CO also need to run frame relay? Could they perhaps run ATM? My

Configuring 2621 router with G.U.I. [7:64937]

2003-03-10 Thread Alan poettker
Hi, Can anyone tell me where I may find specific information reguarding cofiguring a 2600 series router with the GUI interface..(through my internet browser). I would like to know what specific softare may be required to do this or what settings I may need. I do have access to it throush CLI

Re: Basic Frame Relay question [7:64923]

2003-03-10 Thread Amar KHELIFI
the standards official names are actually FRF8 and FRF5. Priscilla Oppenheimer a icrit dans le message de news: [EMAIL PROTECTED] DeVoe, Charles (PKI) wrote: I am looking at frame relay. As I understand it, the frame relay connection goes from the CPE to the service provider CO. My

EtherChannel - WOW Thats great [7:64940]

2003-03-10 Thread Steven Aiello
That's for all the info on Ether channel. What a wonderful idea. Is Ether channel hard to set up? I don't have the 100 Mb routers to try this at home or even 2 100Mbs switches. Does any one have a sample config file form a router or switch that uses it? Thanks again all you are all great (

RE: General comments on Cisco Teaching [7:64833]

2003-03-10 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
Cisco Nuts wrote: Howard, Why in the world would Cisco start at 92001 for the CCSI? Any particular reason for such a high number? I think CCSI uses hierarchical addressing unlike the flat addressing used for CCIE. :-) Also, to answer someone else's question, I think you get to keep your

RE: 10 half or 100 full [7:64931]

2003-03-10 Thread John Neiberger
I wanted to mention that we've been in the process of upgrading our switches, as well, and I discovered that since we've started using the new Cisco switches we've been having all sorts of problems getting the speed and duplex settings set correctly. We've discovered that if you have relatively

Re: Configuring 2621 router with G.U.I. [7:64937]

2003-03-10 Thread Amar KHELIFI
well it's not a web interface, but configmaker will configure it all, from voice to ipsec etc Alan poettker a icrit dans le message de news: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi, Can anyone tell me where I may find specific information reguarding cofiguring a 2600 series router with the GUI

Re: EtherChannel - WOW Thats great [7:64940]

2003-03-10 Thread Amar KHELIFI
le09186a0080094689.shtml Steven Aiello a icrit dans le message de news: [EMAIL PROTECTED] That's for all the info on Ether channel. What a wonderful idea. Is Ether channel hard to set up? I don't have the 100 Mb routers to try this at home or even 2 100Mbs switches. Does any one have a

Re: Basic Frame Relay question [7:64923]

2003-03-10 Thread John Hutchison
Frame Relay connections CAN be fed into an ATM circuit at your provider's end. The translation is done via the telco. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=64944t=64923 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:

Re: EtherChannel - WOW Thats great [7:64940]

2003-03-10 Thread Amar KHELIFI
here us are, this doc has the cat ios version of the commands. engoy :) http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk389/tk213/technologies_configuration_examp le09186a0080094689.shtml Amar KHELIFI a icrit dans le message de news: [EMAIL PROTECTED] le09186a0080094689.shtml Steven Aiello a icrit dans le

Re: Basic Frame Relay question [7:64923]

2003-03-10 Thread Amar KHELIFI
indeed, much like what happens with frame relay into x25, which gets encapsulated directely but in the case of FR and ATM there is some mapping to be done, like the DE field mapped to the CLP, and translation etc...; John Hutchison a icrit dans le message de news: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: 10 half or 100 full [7:64931]

2003-03-10 Thread Scott Roberts
if I understand what you're saying, I think its always been like that, cisco hasn't changed it. you're refering to the fact that the IOS switch don't let you change the speed? I think thats strange also, the set based switch can allow you to change speed, but after the IOS upgrading of switches

RE: DTP and VTP Domain [7:64892]

2003-03-10 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is VTP dependent of DTP or is DTP dependent of VTP?. From the following statement I think DTP can still form a trunk even if VTP domain is different on both switches. I doubt that DTP can form a trunk if the VTP domains are different, though Cisco's documentation

Re: 10 half or 100 full [7:64931]

2003-03-10 Thread John Neiberger
No, that's not at all what I was referring to. I'm speaking of the behavior of switch interfaces when they're set to AUTO. Nortel switches (at least the ones that we used) and some older Cisco switches like the 2924XL seemed to behave like Option #1 below, while the 2950 behaves like Option #2.

Re: 10 half or 100 full [7:64931]

2003-03-10 Thread Scott Roberts
I see what you're saying now. what would be nice to see is what traffic there is on a protocol analyzer. I would think that #2 should be the situation and your #1 is not the proper negotiation. I've never tried to cpature auttonegotiation with an analyzer before, I wonder if you can even capture

Re: 10 half or 100 full [7:64931]

2003-03-10 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
Scott Roberts wrote: if I understand what you're saying, I think its always been like that, cisco hasn't changed it. What he's saying is that if you manually configure the duplex mode, the IEEE standards don't say if the port should participate in autonegotiation or not. Since there's no

Re: 10 half or 100 full [7:64931]

2003-03-10 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
Scott Roberts wrote: I see what you're saying now. what would be nice to see is what traffic there is on a protocol analyzer. I would think that #2 should be the situation and your #1 is not the proper negotiation. I've never tried to cpature auttonegotiation with an analyzer before, I

Re: Sniffer on Catalyst 6509 [7:64894]

2003-03-10 Thread Sam Sneed
Yes and here is how you configure it: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/switches/ps708/products_configuration _guide_chapter09186a00800c65f8.html Eduardo Perestrelo wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi, I have a Catalyst 6509 and need to sniff network. If possible

Re: 10 half or 100 full [7:64931]

2003-03-10 Thread John Neiberger
The problem is that neither behavior is proper! :-) The only method mentioned in the standard is autonegotiation. Any other setting, including manually setting the speed and duplex, is non-standard and undefined. I'm not aware of the frame-level details of Nway negotiation so I'm not sure what

PPP callback [7:64955]

2003-03-10 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
I'm re-reading Cisco Press' Building Cisco Remote Access Networks, edited by Catherine Paquet. It's a great book, but they mangled the discussion of dialer hold-queue and dialer enable-timeout for PPP callback. Do I understand this correctly after reverse engineering what maybe they meant to say:

RE: DTP and VTP Domain [7:64892]

2003-03-10 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
DTP uses protocol type 2004 too, just like DISL. I guess it's just an update to DISL for use with 802.1Q rather than ISL? And, I figured out why you might want to tell DTP not to autonegotiate or be desirable and why in that case no VTP domain name is exchanged and the VTP domain names don't have

Re: General comments on Cisco Teaching [7:64833]

2003-03-10 Thread dre
Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote in message ... But as Howard has said, you can't really use the number and be an active CCSI unless you are currently employed at a Cisco Certified Learning Partner (or employed at Cisco itself.) Cisco, CLP's, CLSP's (solutions partner) and ILP's (internal learning

Re: Network Design - What Priscilla did NOT cover in her book: [7:64957]

2003-03-10 Thread Scott Roberts
wow, I've never worked on such a large order, but the RFPs I've designed out have never been this much of a joke. it seems that the IT staff of this company had no clue what they wanted or needed and decided to get some free advice! the only similair scenario I can mention is when a small private

Re: Network Design - What Priscilla did NOT cover in her book: [7:64959]

2003-03-10 Thread John Neiberger
Chuck, Your story illustrates why I wouldn't make a good consultant. In reading your story I found several points where I would have walked out, but only after shoving Tab A (the scope of work) up that guys Slot A. :-) Figuratively speaking, of course. John Scott Roberts 3/10/03 2:52:54 PM

Re: Network Design - What Priscilla did NOT cover [7:64959]

2003-03-10 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
OK, I've seen enough of this inaccurate title for a thread. Of course Top-Down Network Design covers Layer 8 and above issues. It's a main focus of the first chapter and one of the reasons the book has done so well. One of my goals was to help newbies, especially, and also the guys (and yes, it's

Difficult RFPs [7:64957]

2003-03-10 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
Scott Roberts wrote: wow, I've never worked on such a large order, but the RFPs I've designed out have never been this much of a joke. it seems that the IT staff of this company had no clue what they wanted or needed and decided to get some free advice! the only similair scenario I can

Help In T1 CSU/DSU [7:64962]

2003-03-10 Thread Monu Sekhon
Hi all I have T1 Csu/dsu card on 2691 platform Whenever I execute any service module command it gives the following error Example:command given service module t1 clock source internal %Serive moduule command failed,Lock timeout error Can any body guide me out what is this error why I am unable to

RE: Help In T1 CSU/DSU [7:64962]

2003-03-10 Thread Monu Sekhon
Sorry the exact error is %Serive module command failed,Lock obtain timeout Monu Sekhon wrote: Hi all I have T1 Csu/dsu card on 2691 platform Whenever I execute any service module command it gives the following error Example:command given service module t1 clock source internal %Serive

Re: Sniffer on Catalyst 6509 [7:64894]

2003-03-10 Thread rico
yes Port Spanning.. -- Original Message -- From: Eduardo Perestrelo Reply-To: Eduardo Perestrelo Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2003 12:44:29 GMT Hi, I have a Catalyst 6509 and need to sniff network. If possible enable one port to read all traffic to

Cool Tool Wish List [7:64991]

2003-03-10 Thread John Neiberger
Here's a tool that would be relatively simple to write for those with good scripting skills (not me), and I'd love to get my hands on it. Wouldn't it be great to have a tool that could look at a switch, determine which interfaces have only a single host attached, and then change the port name or

TFTP to Flash or PCMCIA problem - no problem on the opposite [7:64995]

2003-03-10 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
There is an error message on the CiscoTFTP server when trying to copy the IOS from the server to a 3640 router. There is no problem in the opposite way (from the router to the TFTP server). I tryed different PCs and different IOS versions. The same problem happens copying from TFTP server to

Re: ??? MPLS ??? [7:64898]

2003-03-10 Thread Karen E Young
Converge Network Digest has a few tutorials on MPLS on their web site. Not alot of detail but really good overviews for someone new to the technology. http://www.convergedigest.com/Bandwidth/archive/010910TUTORIAL-rgallaher1.htm Hope this helps, Karen *** REPLY SEPARATOR ***

PRI [7:64999]

2003-03-10 Thread maine dude
Hi All, Quick question I hope you can help me with. How many D channels does a PRI have? I always thought it was two, but its states 1 in most places. Text taken from the CCNP remote access guide (to make it more confusing): there are 30 timeslots, leaving 2 timeslots for signalling and

TFTP to Flash or PCMCIA problem - no problem on the opposite [7:64994]

2003-03-10 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
There is an error message on the CiscoTFTP server when trying to copy the IOS from the server to a 3640 router. There is no problem in the opposite way (from the router to the TFTP server). I tryed different PCs and different IOS versions. The same problem happens copying from TFTP server to

help to find where it from? [7:65001]

2003-03-10 Thread Richard Campbell
Hi.. We receive a lot of spam mail from digitalpowerfilter.com. I have the following question to ask. 1)I checked on www.dnsstuff.com that the domain owned by ISP in US. But my admin told me that it is with odyssey ISP Bribane, Australia. Which one is true? 2)I found that the owner is [EMAIL

Re: Basic Frame Relay question [7:64923]

2003-03-10 Thread MADMAN
Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote: DeVoe, Charles (PKI) wrote: I am looking at frame relay. As I understand it, the frame relay connection goes from the CPE to the service provider CO. My question is, does the destination device on the other side of the CO also need to run frame relay? Could they

Re: ??? Etherchannel ??? [7:64900]

2003-03-10 Thread Karen E Young
Etherchannel is a way of bundling together multiple links between switches or between a switch and a router so that they function as a whole. Here's a link to a white paper about it on Cisco's site. http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk389/tk213/technologies_white_paper09186a0080092944.shtml Hope

RE: 10 half or 100 full [7:64931]

2003-03-10 Thread Karagozian Sarkis
Hi Mike, all I have come accress this problem when connecting Novell Servers/Clients to Cisco switches, the solution is two things. 1/ enable spantree portfast on these cisco ports by: set spantree portfast 6/3 enable But be carefull this is good idea only for ports connecting to a single host

Re: EtherChannel - WOW Thats great [7:64940]

2003-03-10 Thread MADMAN
There are a boatload of examples on CCO and no it's quite easy to configure. If you have access here are a bunch of examples: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/customer/tech/tk389/tk213/tech_configuration_examples_list.html Dave Steven Aiello wrote: That's for all the info on Ether channel.

Re: Configuring 2621 router with G.U.I. [7:64937]

2003-03-10 Thread MADMAN
see ip http server IOS command. No special software required. IMHO stick to CLI ;) Dave Alan poettker wrote: Hi, Can anyone tell me where I may find specific information reguarding cofiguring a 2600 series router with the GUI interface..(through my internet browser). I would like to

Re: DTP and VTP Domain [7:64892]

2003-03-10 Thread Marty Adkins
Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote: DTP uses protocol type 2004 too, just like DISL. I guess it's just an update to DISL for use with 802.1Q rather than ISL? Yes. Step 1: negotiate whether to trunk. Step 2: if the result is yes, then negotiate which flavor. If both are indifferent, favor ISL.

RE: 10 half or 100 full [7:64931]

2003-03-10 Thread John Neiberger
I have been trying to follow this, and I still do not see why we should get away from the old Cisco switch courses that if you set both sides to 100 full duplex if they are capable you will be fine. I have not seen any situation where hard setting both sides caused problems (am I missing

Re: Basic Frame Relay question [7:64923]

2003-03-10 Thread Karen E Young
They could. In fact, its quite likely. The link from your CPE goes into a port on one of their WAN switches. from there it goes over a trunk utilizing either Fast Packet (FP) or ATM to another WAN switch. There may be a number of WAN switches between your CPE and the destination CPE. You can get

Re: What is different between SIP, MGCP and H.323? [7:64877]

2003-03-10 Thread
That's a huge subject and one that would require a very long and detailed explaination. In short however the basics are as follows: h.323 has been around awhile and is the basic standard out there. Cisco only made IP phones that supported h.323 for the longest time. They now are into SIP

RE: Load Balancing and NAT [7:64904]

2003-03-10 Thread Howard C. Berkowitz
At 5:41 PM + 3/10/03, Logan, Harold wrote: I have a question about this setup, but it's more deisgn-oriented than configuration. What's the benefit of having redundant ISPs if they both connect to one router? Single router with multiple ISPs: Protects you against failure in the

Re: General comments on Cisco Teaching [7:64833]

2003-03-10 Thread The Long and Winding Road
seeing as the CCSI number uses only 2 digits for the date field, did the program implode as Y2K came and went? ;- -- TANSTAAFL there ain't no such thing as a free lunch Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Cisco Nuts wrote: Howard, Why in the world would

Re: Difficult RFPs [7:64957]

2003-03-10 Thread The Long and Winding Road
Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Scott Roberts wrote: wow, I've never worked on such a large order, but the RFPs I've designed out have never been this much of a joke. it seems that the IT staff of this company had no clue what they wanted or needed and

Re: Any w2k syslog server avaiable? [7:64883]

2003-03-10 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
3com (tftp , syslog and ftp all in one program...) - Original Message - From: The Long and Winding Road To: Sent: Monday, March 10, 2003 11:15 AM Subject: Re: Any w2k syslog server avaiable? [7:64883] Richard Campbell wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi.. I used to use

Re: IP Telephony [7:64847]

2003-03-10 Thread Nate
LWR, Thank you for your input. Yes there is a business plan that needs to get made. I do realize that the 'white collars' want this and that's the primary reason why I emailed the group. I currently don't have access to certain parts of the billing as far as long distance, phone charges, and

Re: DTP and VTP Domain [7:64892]

2003-03-10 Thread Karen E Young
As long as the native VLAN is the same on both ends so that the ends of the prospective trunk link can communicate, DTP will be able to form the trunk. The VTP domain is irrelevant. All DTP needs is layer 2 connectivity and the desire (on both ends) to trunk. :-) In fact, one of the requirements

  1   2   >