Hi
We get increased spam reports from outlook.com user regarding emails
sent from our customers to them which look like personal emails. Not
commercial spam.
When addressing the complaint with our customers it turns out, the
email address the sent the email to, if not mistyped, previously
belonge
Hi
Brazil uses a system of electronic invoices called NFe.
I was in contact with oobj.com.br one of the companies running that
system after more and more of those NFe emails started hitting
recipients here.
This attracts scammer which send spoofed electronic invoices to
companies in the hope the
Hi all
Our customers increasingly get phishing emails targeting our email
platform accessible under the domain: Cloudflare-ipfs.com
(interplanetary file system, I guess that is their name for CNS).
I reported some of those to the cloudflare abuse desk.
To my surprise, after usually 1 or two days
> Yes, there are joe jobs. No, there are not very many.
Yes, everyone can send emails containing targeted URI to known
spamtraps, which then will extract and feed those URI to URI Blacklists.
So I guess this works on in similar way, just for email addresses found
in emails.
Joe-Jobs are an issu
Hi List
I came across emails rejected by mailhash.josephlist.net
reason: 550 5.7.1 block listed email address s...@example.com by
mailhash.josephlist.net (c559b92e0e284312b26c88d4bb707d14)
What I found out is that the email content is searched for email
addresses and if some hash of that email
Hi
If anyone from sendinblue is reading here.
We have repeated issue of tracking URI used by sendinblue get used in
emails sent to our spamtraps/honeypot mimiking an open relay, causing
the sender ip (not from the network of sendinblue) and 'spamvertized'
trackingdomain to get blacklisted, thus l
Hi
> As the list is restricted, that’s pretty poor business practice - “We expect
> you to reply to this message, but you can’t, and here’s why!”
Yes, this is exactly what we get...
From: noreply@...
CC: ms-peering-updates@...
Subject: BGP Peering AS8075, Request to increase prefix filter
Plea
Hi List
Maybe somebody could enlighten me, what is going on
We very often face the issue of Office365 business customers sending an
email to us and asking for reply, but when we reply we get:
=== schnip ===
Your message to [RECIPIENT] couldn't be delivered.
The group [USERPART OF EMAIL] onl
Hi Christoph
> I am attempting to send mail from a M365 tenancy, however, we are seeing
> issues with it being filtered due to the address appearing on bl.spamcop.net.
> "Decision Engine classified the mail item was rejected because of IP Block
> (from outbound normal IP pools) -> 550 mail from
https://blacklist.imp.ch/entry.php?id=1.0.8.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.2.1.e.2.3.0.4.f.1.1.1.0.1.0.a.2
no further comment needed...
Mit freundlichen Grüssen
-Benoît Panizzon-
--
I m p r o W a r e A G-Leiter Commerce Kunden
__
Zurlind
Hi Laura
> Cloudflare does not concern itself with abuse. It does not host any websites,
> it only proxies back to the web host. They are not responsible for the
> content and they are unable to disconnect customers.
I am aware they do not host the content.
But they hide the IP address of the
Hi
> If you want any real action from Cloudflare, you have to jump through the
> hoop of filling in the web based abuse form. It sucks but only you can
> decide whether it's worth your time and effort.
Yes, but what I don't get is, why on their first reply, they confirm
opening a case but then ne
Hi out there
A website, most probably hacked WordPress, behind cloudflare, is hosting
a phishing site targetting our webmail user.
I reported this to the owner of the hacked website. I know he read my
messages and choose to ignore the issue.
So next step, report to cloudflare.
First reply from
Hi List
With little hope, that anyone @ microsoft is reading this list. I have
attempted to contact Microsoft on many different ways to try to address
those issues.
Clearly a phishing email claiming being from DPD hitting one of our
spamtraps square in the face causing immediate blacklisting of t
Hi List...
There is a company which is sending a lot of misdirected/unwanted email
via Amazon SES and has failed to react to my attempts to contact them
by email and phone in the last 14 days or so to try to solve the issue.
Usually I then go ahead and block the envelope-sender domain. In this
ca
Hi Gang
virusfree.cz is listing one of our mail servers.
I opened a support case with them almost two weeks ago to ask for a
delisting and reason/evidence for the listing.
They are praised for their good support:
https://www.virusfree.cz/en/customers-and-support
Unfortunately I don't get any re
Hi Team
I would be very happy, if anymone at microsoft could get
in touch with me, we probably get more than 90% false positives from
the microsoft spam report robot.
Newest crazy addition!
exam...@outlook.com is sending an email indicating request for a
delivery report.
Our server AFTER delive
Ok, my bad...
Missed the -crlf option because SMTP requires CRLF line endings.
STARTTLS works.
So actual conclusion: outlook.office365.com
SMTP: Plain SSL on Port 465 not accessible.
STARTLS on 587 (and 25) works!
IMAP: STARTLS advertised but BROKEN on port 143 since 2 days.
Plain SS
Hi..
Weird... if somebody could point me to what I'm doing wrong...
Our Postfix:
Jul 18 08:04:53 asterix postfix/smtp[81902]: Untrusted TLS connection
established to hotmail-com.olc.protection.outlook.com[104.47.51.33]:25: TLSv1.2
with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)
Is very
Hi again
IMAP Login thankfully works on imaps port 993 with plain SSL.
But now I get the same issue with SMTP.
Port 465 which traditionally is used for smtps via plain SSL is
closed.
Port 587 advertises STARTTLS:
Trying 2603:1026:c0b:16::2...
Connected to outlook.office365.com.
Escape characte
Hi Oliver
> As far as I know Microsoft never officially supported or advertised STARTTLS
> for its mail submission services. Given that RFC8314 "Use of Transport Layer
> Security for Email Submission and Access" basically deprecates STARTTLS in
> favor of implicit TLS for submission services, I
Hi Team
Since two days I'm unable to connect to an Office365 IMAP Mailbox with
OAUTH2
My client connects to Port 143 and performs STARTTLS but is not getting
anything in reply.
Is there a known outage? Hast Microsoft discontinued STARTTLS?
Mit freundlichen Grüssen
-Benoît Panizzon-
--
I m p r
Hi List
One more technical question after some discussion with one of our
customers.
Sender has SPF entry:
"v=spf1 ip4:10.1.2.0/25 include:_spf.example.com -all"
_spf.example.com either has no txt entry or just does not exist.
So from my point of view, the SPF entry is still valid as it has at
Hi List
I'm surprised...
six-group.com is the biggest payment platform in Switzerland. Of course
they use SPF to protect their domain from being abused by phishers.
It looks like GV0CHE01FT013.mail.protection.outlook.com is happily
accepting phishing emails which, according to SPF should get rej
For heaven's sake Microsoft!
I'm trying to report the same spaming Office 365 Customer again which
uses a shared ip address with some other Swiss companies that use
Office 365 and experience collateral damage...
That is NOT the reply I expect.
=== snipp ===
Delivery has failed to these recipien
Hi all
Received: from mail-vi1eur04on0730.outbound.protection.outlook.com
([IPv6:2a01:111:f400:fe0e::730]:47502) from new...@news-science-travel.com
Auth: by a Spamtrap on 2001:4060:dead:beef::1907:2 25 pretending to be an
open relay for jodyyw...@blacklist.woody.ch; Mon, 27 Mar 2023 07:22:56
> This is a good hypothesis but so far I have not seen any absolute
> confirmation that they are "listing the world." I guess we will see...
I fear this is the case. I have contacted the ISP in question whose
ctasd instance was adding 6 SpamAssassin Points to every email sent by
their customer.
T
Hi All
I have started seeing a lot of emails sent via one Swiss ISP flagged as
spam by the SpamAssassin CTASD, which according to Google, is Cyren's
anti spam service.
Have they started flagging all emails as spam to tell their customer to
stop using their service?
Mit freundlichen Grüssen
-Ben
Hi Gang
Short update: Was 'human error' on our side. Submission Host was
wrongly advetised as one of the 'MX'.
Mit freundlichen Grüssen
-Benoît Panizzon-
--
I m p r o W a r e A G-Leiter Commerce Kunden
__
Zurlindenstrasse 29
Hi Gang
Very strange observation with a Office365 customer.
We have separate ip addresses for MX and submission.
MX => Obviously only accepting emails for local recipients.
Submission => Requiring SMTP authentication to send emails no matter
what destination.
With a customer with his own domai
Hi
> > First of all: I am fed up with telling people to look for missing emails in
> > their spamfolders.
> >
> > If I have to check a spamfolder for false positives every day, I can just
> > have them delivered to my inbox. The spamfolder does not have an advantage
> > then.
> >
> > Your user'
Hi
> If you are looking for something that integrates as a milter like opendkim,
> dkimpy-milter seems to do exactly that. With a bit of luck it could even
> integrate with your existing opendkim configuration.
I'll have a look at it.
> However, I am curious about what the issue is with opendkim
Hi
I would also be interested in finding a 'plug in' replacement for the,
sometimes dodgy openDKIM milter.
> rspamd or WildDuck
rspamd is a full featured spamfilter. I only need the part that
validates and signs DKIM.
WildDuck is a fully featured mail plattform.
I guess I have to stick with Op
Hi Sebastien
> One common issue is Canonicalization. Try setting your to relaxed/relaxed and
> it solves many issues. Many of these things "downconvert" the emails into
> 7BITMIME and also munge certain whitespace characters, which can b0rk the
> signatures.
>
> So try setting to relaxed/relax
Hi Gang
Maybe I could ask for some help here...
We have a DKIM issue with recipients which use Anti-Spam Products from
Barracuda Networks.
All tests we could find, confirm that we configured Domainkey correctly
for the domain imp.ch and signatures are valid. Google is happy with
our signatures.
Following up to this issue...
The 'comments' field while requesting a delisting is obviously not being
looked at by Spamhaus.
Opening a case via their contacts page worked smoothly and the cause
was found in a 'too aggressive rule' that has been fixed in the
meantime, but still no very clear stat
Hopefully somebody from spamhaus is reading.
The 2nd day in a row, our main mailplattform IP address is listed and
outlook.com blocks all emails.
Spamhaus only gives a timestamp +/- 5 minutes.
There are A LOT OF EMAILS passing our plattform in 10 Minutes.
Yesterday I found a suspect. One custom
Hi List
One of the local electricity plants is sending invoices via hosted
Office 365 emails services to it's customers, many hosted on our email
platform. It's a larger Office 365 customer.
Many of those emails were rejected as spam. So they opened a case with
our abuse desk. I noticed their IP
Hi
Please contact me regarding BT 'Customer-Resolutionteam' directing to
open support cases via Community Support Site, but Email Verification
failing with:
RCPT from outbound-dkim.eu.khoros-mail.com[34.246.32.154]: 450 4.1.8
: Sender address rejected: Domain not found;
from=
community-mail.b
Hi Marcus
I had a similar issue some time ago.
Google uses some 'Domain Reputation' Woodoo.
I used to operate an automated spam feedback loop from my spamtrap,
under a specific hostname in my domain. One only used for those reports.
Unfortunately, it looks like some 'abuse contact addresses' as
Hi
> 2021-06-29 mta214a-ord.mtasv.net [104.245.209.214]
> 2021-06-29 mta216a-ord.mtasv.net [104.245.209.216]
> 2020-11-25 mta200a-ord.mtasv.net [104.245.209.200]
Thank you. I can confirm, other customers (other domains on our
platform) are getting email from those IP Addre
Hi List
I guess some of you have also contacted DigitalOcean's abuse desk in the
past. We did so from our abuse desk email address.
I was quite surprised, to find our abuse desk email address subscribed
to DigitalOcean's:
* Educational Resources
* Events and Meetups
* User Research Surveys
* Web
Hi List
I just tumbled over a new was those attackers have found to distribute
their PDF to avoid being blocked by spam filter and virus scanner (or
maybe just a coincidence?)
The attacker sends an email to a Zendesk support site, with the PDF
attachment and a huge list of recipients CC.
The Zen
Dear List
One of our main smtp outbound ip addresses is blocked by microsoft.
host outlook-com.olc.protection.outlook.com[104.47.10.33] said: 550 5.7.1
Unfortunately, messages from [157.161.12.84] weren't sent. Please
contact
your Internet service provider since part of their network is on our
bl
Hi Gang
I wonder of anyone else has seen this kind of this issue between EXIM
and Postfix.
Sender uses Exim, Version unknown
Recipient uses Postfix 3.1.0
Email is sent to a lot of recipients. Postfix is configured to only
accept a certain amount of recipients.
Surplus recipients get rejected by
Hi List
I already mentioned this issue some time ago, and now I am seeing this
more often again.
Sometimes the From: Header and evelope-from from Outlook.com customers
do NOT contain their email address but a strange hex string.
This is an authentic email from one of our customers.
So I wanted
> Would that even change the customer behaviour? I doubt so.
> Maybe if they make it so user has to click 5 times through warnings
> before it ends to the junk folder, while trash is only 1 click away.
> But, if they do that, people would also probably stop reporting junk.
I am sure this would s
Hi Gang
We had one more case of one of our customers sending commercial
newsletters resulting in us getting complaints from hotmail.com etc.
users.
We confronted our customer and requested a proof of opt-in for the
Microsoft recipients. Our customer ignored this.
So on the next occurrence, we bl
Hi List
In the last couple of days we face an increasing amount of phishing
sites hosted @ firebasestorage.googleapis.com targeting our customers.
They get taken down rather quickly when added to phishtank.com, but
still they are valid for one or two days after reception, long enough
for stup** c
Hi Rob
This works like a charm, blocking a lot of: bounces+8465718 atm.
Thank you for your excellent plugin!
Mit freundlichen Grüssen
-Benoît Panizzon-
--
I m p r o W a r e A G-Leiter Commerce Kunden
__
Zurlindenstrasse 29
Am Tue, 18 Aug 2020 11:01:19 -0700
schrieb Luke via mailop :
> In the Return-Path. "bounces+1234567" the number following bounces+ is the
> SendGrid account ID.
Return-Path:
Does the c581 part also belong to the account id?
I might consider trying to extract this on my spamtrap and collect the
Here's my contribution (Reversed IP)
Last 6 months for a single hit, possily longer back if there are more
hits.
This is just the 'hits' by spamtrap or customer report database, not
the actual blacklisted ip addresses. Most of them did not get
blacklisted because of positive dnswl.org crosscheck.
Hi List
o1678912x138.outbound-mail.sendgrid.net [167.89.12.138] and IP under
control of sendgrid was repeatedly involved in phishing and other spam
since June.
It ended up being blacklisted @ SWINOG.
Now a sendgrid customers complains to us, that his emails are being
rejected because of this lis
Hi Tim
No, ICMP is not being blocked. At least not on the IMAP server side.
Yes, IPv6 in use, but the affected customer mostly don't use IPv6 and
don't use mobile networks.
But since we increased to 50 connections per user+ip the complaints are
almost gone.
As I understand, Outlook 2016 opens on
Hi Gang
We use DoveCot as IMAP Server and have limited the number of
connections per IMAP account to 20 which looks to have been sufficient
in the past couple of years.
Since about two weeks we get an increased number of users complaining
about IMAP connections problem and name (0x8...) error mes
> >Range, 192.241.227.0/24
>
> One connect each on Thu, Sat, Sun, and Mon. Did EHLO after banner, then
> closed the connection.
116 connections between 27. June and 1. July to my spamtrap / honeypot,
mostly sending "EHLO zg-0626-127" and then disconnecting.
Mit freundlichen Grüssen
-Benoî
Hi Laura
> Why is Google applying a strict reject when the policy is p=none?
I think I mentioned that I reverted back to p=none quickly after I saw
such rejects. TTL is 300 :-)
--
-Benoît Panizzon-
--
I m p r o W a r e A G-Leiter Commerce Kunden
__
Hi Tim
> and I guess the domain in the HELO too?
the HELO contains the FQDN of the sending machine which is
not the same as the domain of the envelope sender or From: Header.
The HELO needing to match anything for DMARC or SPF would be quite new
to me.
--
-Benoît Panizzon-
--
I m p r o W a r
Hi Gang
I'm on the way of more widely deploying DMARC and also testing DKIM
once again. Also on our ISP email service domains.
So at the moment I'm only using DMARC with SPF. According to my
reading on how DMARC works, if no DKIM record is published, a passing
SPF record is sufficient for authent
Hi Gang
My personal mailserver is not able to send any emails to gmail accounts
since several months. I was hoping this would solve itself eventually.
It did not.
There are no breaches or spam or anything sent from that server. I
would know as I am part of the AS6772 Abuse Desk. :-) Just the
doze
Hi
Just a clarification on the issue, as we just got a 2nd similar
complaint from another Tor Exit node operator (obviously same attacker
being routed through another exit, guessing from the involved email
addresses).
The Spamtrap / HoneyPot in question not only listens to port 25 but also
listen
Hi List
Lately, our customers are getting an increased amount of phishing
emails, or emails containing malware with legit looking From: headers
from either banks, or even from our own customer support.
SPF would block the From email addresses if also used as envelope
sender. But the, from the cus
Dear List
We operate Spamtraps which feed the SWINOG Anti-Spam Blacklist.
A feedback loop is sent to the abuse-c of the IP Address from which
email or attackts to spamtraps was detected.
Occasionally, spam or more often, log-in attempts and dictionary
attacks on the submission ports of the spamt
Hi Gang
I wonder if others have also started seing such emails:
Source:
Received: from routemea20.hes.trendmicro.eu (routemea20.hes.trendmicro.eu
[3.125.147.66])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by idefix.imp.c
Hi
> Happy holidays all,
Same to you!
> Curious, does anyone happen to have a contact or know of a proper escalation
> route at China Telecom? Seeing some wonkiness that I can't explain.
Also very interrested in this! Habe been trying to get hold of a tech @
China Telecom since monts, if n
Hi Gang
Over the last months, I have observed many email mailbox abuses from the
"Jeny SAS" IP Range in Benin which used passwords probably obtained by
phishing attacks.
The interesting thing here is: If we block SMTP for the affected
mailbox, this usually solves the issue.
Our customer then sti
Hi List
One IP address of our email plattform, got a '20' score @
senderscore.org because of emails to 'unknown recipients'
This causes one of the major swiss banks to put emails sent from our
customers which were sent via this IP into a quanantine folder.
So neither the sender nor the recipient
> The customer, in that case, need to change from REJECT to DISCARD or
> QUARANTINE.
Yes, that would be an option. But from my experience, this leads to the
problem of 'disappearing' emails in case of false positives.
Usually no email admin looks into the quarantine, unless somebody
complains n
> On 24/10/2019 14:12, Benoit Panizzon via mailop wrote:
> > I also considered hacking together a small 'relay' MTA which would
> > receive the email but not reply OK to the final DATA command (RFC
> > states you can take up to 60 seconds to reply to the DATA comman
Hi Stefan
> So the reject generates bounces at our spamfilters. Howto handle this?
Yes, I do know this issue, as we offer a similar service.
And I must admit, I have no real solution if you use some out of the
stock MTA like postfix or sendmail which work on store and forward
basis.
I also cons
Hi All
I'm looking for a direct contact to the Mailchimp Abuse Desk, regarding
a case of a repeated spamer I opened in March this year.
Mailchimp told me they need some time to verify my evidences and
reconstruct how their customer acted.
I update that mailchimp case with the question if they fi
Hi Chris
I have exactly the same issue.
I have found a hotmail user who made rule to 'save' all emails from a
whole list of 'known friends' sender to the 'junk' folder. Causing an
immediate Spam Complaint from Microsoft every time one of our customers
sends that hotmail user an email.
The hotmai
Hi Laura
> In my experience, when the bounce message says "Please contact your Internet
> service provider since part of their network is on our block list (S3150).”
> That means that Microsoft is seeing problems across a wide range of IPs in a
> space and they don’t have a clear picture of whe
Hi List
One of our mail platform IP has once more been hit by an outlook.com
blocking:
host outlook-com.olc.protection.outlook.com[104.47.4.33] said: 550 5.7.1
Unfortunately, messages from [157.161.12.116] weren't sent. Please contact
your Internet service provider since part of their network is
Hi Team
Just a follow up on that case, as from the feedback I got it looks
others are also affected by this problem.
I finally managed to get the attention of an Amazon SES Tech who agreed
to look into the issue and got an explanation of what most probably
happened.
Amazon SES does NOT block who
Hi Mathieu
> I don't see that as a problem, I mean I completly understand the logic behind
> that. If someone wants to organize their inbox they can create subfolders
> easily, using the spam folder to "rearrange" your emails is just plain
> stupid, especially as mails in the spam folder are de
Hi List
A couple of days ago we found out, that Mircosoft offers an Feedback
Loop to received complaints about spam incidents.
Perfect, one more source we can use to detect and block phished
customers's account or trojanized devices. So we enabled this.
That works good so far, but we also repeat
Hi Marc
> https://mxtoolbox.com/SuperTool.aspx?action=mx%3aleunet.ch&run=toolpage
>
> Suggest you fix that and come back to them.
DMARC? It's not an error, it's not a requirement.
The AWS customer who notified the problem uses this email domain:
https://mxtoolbox.com/SuperTool.aspx?action=mx%3
Hi List
Amazon AWS SES Support drives me and their customer mad.
So I wonder if any other email operator had a similar issue and might
know what causes Amazon AWS SES Services to block email delivery to a
specific domain and how this can be solved.
We are an ISP and operate email services for va
Regarding Case: 6265209991 (opened by an amazon SES customer for us)
Basically it turned out, that Amazon SES has put one of our customer's
email address on an internal blocklist or similar, causing our customer
not to receive any emails sent via amazon SES. But still we would like
to learn what c
Dear List
Silverpop is an email marketing platform accredited by CSA, therefore
whitelisted with some email platform operators.
They add such a header in emails via their plattform:
X-CSA-Complaints: whitelist-complai...@eco.de
Well one silverpop customer keeps sending spam to one of our suppor
Hi List
Operating the SWINOG Blacklist and Spamtraps, I notice quite some spam
originating from Google IPv6 Ranges (yes, trying to catching up
whitelisting them, which is not easy with their constant morphing).
Usually the Received: Line parser skips a line indicating a whitelisted
souce IP.
Unf
> Have you taken a look at white.uribl.com:
Perfect, exactly what I was looking for.
Mit freundlichen Grüssen
-Benoît Panizzon-
--
I m p r o W a r e A G-Leiter Commerce Kunden
__
Zurlindenstrasse 29 Tel +41 61 826 93 00
Hi Mailops!
We operate the SWNIOG Blacklists and Spamtraps.
We fairly often find URI which make it onto the blacklist, which should
clearly be whitelisted. Like 'apple.com' just this week.
We do maintain a whitelist, but I start wondering, if there are
DNS based URI whitelists which we could que
Hi List
Just wondering as I have come across this situation multiple times.
A domain includes an SPF entries which have different 'all' settings.
Which one is valid?
I would have guessed, that an 'include' should never contain the
'all' statement to make it possible for the domain owner to defin
Hi Grant
> Why are messages, presumably from a human, outbound from RT/4 setting
> the Precedence: header to bulk?
I suppose to silence auto-responders to prevent them to play email
ping-pong. I know the good old 'vacation' tool does not reply on
presence of the bulk header. And also RT/4 itself
Hi all
I'm looking for a contact to Google (or anyone with insight on what
could cause the problem) to solve a specific issue we have with a
company using their ASP services.
Observed Problem:
I send them an email from the email client 'claws-mail'. This is
received perfectly.
But we use RT/4 a
> >nc: connect to rrmx.imp.ch. port 25 (tcp) failed: Network is unreachable
> >nc: connect to rrmx.imp.ch. port 25 (tcp) failed: Network is unreachable
> >nc: connect to rrmx.imp.ch. port 25 (tcp) failed: Network is unreachable
> >
> >So maybe AWS SES is trying to connect to the IPv6 address and ca
Hi List
I have noticed that we didn't get any spamtrap hits advertising
cloudflare.com in the last couple months.
Before, spamers did love their anonymizing proxy service and their
policy which stated as long as it's not DMCA or CP related we won't
take down a customer's site.
Is still states sp
Please contact me off-list
Short story:
A customer of Amazon SES is attempting to send emails to one of our
customers.
Our customer is not getting them, we don't see ANY trace of those
emails in our logs, they just seem to disappear in transit.
Re-Tested yesterday, exact times known.
Long last
Hi List
I wonder if others have also stumbled over the password "Mylove@1".
We use RoundCube as Webmail.
We have 'stupid' customers, who give away their email password by
answering to phishing emails or just simply are victims of trojans
stealing their credentials.
Subsequently those accounts g
Hi List
Since a couple of weeks our customers (and some of our support
email addresses) get spam emails advertising erotica services hosted by
DigiByte Media B.V. in the Netherlands.
Blocking is not easy, as the sender IP, content of emails and
redirection service URI used keeps changing.
Their
Hi List
I wonder if DigitalOcean is running for some social media related
wake-up call.
I Twittered to @digitalocean about the lack of responsiveness from their
abuse desk.
They promptly replied via Twitter:
"We apologise for the trouble. Our security & operation team is already
looking into it
Hi Michael
Just a short update on DigitalOcean after I to
their abuse desk that it took them almost a month to take down an
ubs.com phishing site and they didn't even seem to bother to look at
the other spam sources I mentioned in the same incident report.
It again took them about two weeks to r
94 matches
Mail list logo