I have a proposal that I'm going to run by the Board during our
remaining face-to-face session today that may help with this.
Please Stand By. :)
-Joan
On 2019-05-16 10:43 a.m., Ross Gardler wrote:
Seems to me like we have plenty of people who feel this is a good idea, but not
one we feel
Hi Garren,
+1. I actually went hunting in GitHub for an issue on this, and can't
find one. It probably goes back to JIRA, and I don't have the energy to
dig through that now.
The closest issue that captures this is the same thing - but for
*databases* - and is on our official roadmap from
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WHIMSY-260?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16840688#comment-16840688
]
Joan Touzet commented on WHIMSY-260:
The text of that line is the conditional below
Joan Touzet created WHIMSY-262:
--
Summary: Edit own comments
Key: WHIMSY-262
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WHIMSY-262
Project: Whimsy
Issue Type: New Feature
Reporter
Awasum,
On 2019-05-15 9:42 a.m., Awasum Yannick wrote:
If we really wanted to know the country/country/geographical distribution
of our committers, the most reliable way to do it is to look at the iCLA
files without displaying names of committers, just the countries and we
will know for sure
CouchDB does not rush to release binaries for Debian/Ubuntu/CentOS/RHEL
on major x.0 releases.
It is unlikely we will publish any buster package until after its
official promotion to stable. No release date has been set yet for
buster, though we're aware it is in freeze status. After release,
FYI, I misspoke here:
On 2019-05-14 4:08 p.m., Joan Touzet wrote:
Since this goes past what we want to do for just ourselves, I've renamed
the thread. I just want to remind everyone in this discussion that the
D group (in whatever official form it takes) can't set policy for the
ASF - we can
her languages. I will be super happy if my project's users@
lists are a mix of languages.
My 2 cents,
-Alex
On 5/14/19, 9:19 AM, "Joan Touzet" wrote:
This is something that's been on my mind a lot recently.
We can't come up with a way to support non-English official
com
On 2019-05-14 12:17 p.m., Patricia Shanahan wrote:
On 5/14/2019 8:18 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
On Tue, May 14, 2019 at 5:05 PM Griselda Cuevas
wrote:
...The word does not have a negative connotation to me since I
translated
it from Spanish
Thanks Gris! Indeed in English,
This is something that's been on my mind a lot recently.
We can't come up with a way to support non-English official
communication channels for the Foundation as Bertrand mentions, but if
we don't allow non-official channels in other languages, as the saying
goes, "the Internet will route
I think the point was not that the FAQ needed those things, but the ASF
at large :D and that the different way of phrasing it was intended to
draw attention to all of those things.
-Joan
On 2019-05-13 6:45 p.m., Patricia Shanahan wrote:
I would love truly elegant documentation. However, I am
uchdb 2.3.1 ?
> if yes can you help me too resolv my problem .
>
> thank you for your answers and comments..
>
> Victor.
>
> Le lun. 13 mai 2019 à 18:49, Joan Touzet a écrit :
>>
>> Hi Victor,
>>
>> The way external view servers are invoked has changed in 2.
On 2019-05-13 16:37, Griselda Cuevas wrote:
> Teaching by preaching is what will earn us respect, credibility and
> authority to speak of this topic.
Gris, can I ask what you mean by "preaching" in this context?
For me this has a very negative connotation and feels out of place in a
secular
Hi Victor,
The way external view servers are invoked has changed in 2.3.x and up,
due to security reasons. You should always read the release notes before
blindly upgrading.
The release notes for 2.3.x are here:
http://docs.couchdb.org/en/stable/whatsnew/2.3.html#upgrade-notes
-Joan
On
Couple of thoughts - sorry for being brief, and really not trying to
bikeshed here:
* We need someone to shepherd this, thank you Patricia for volunteering!
Generally my opinion is that the work of building the content should
fall to those who have learned, not the explainers, who are the
It depends which sub-group you are talking about, and whether you are
referring to current or former relationships.
The Jicarilla Apache in New Mexico actively refer to themselves as a
Nation, as do the Yavapai-Apache Nation, the San Carlos Apache Nation
and the Fort McDowell Yavapai Nation. Many
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WHIMSY-260?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Joan Touzet updated WHIMSY-260:
---
Attachment: Archive 19-05-10 16-24-02.har
> Cannot see prior comments on PMR repo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WHIMSY-260?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16837581#comment-16837581
]
Joan Touzet commented on WHIMSY-260:
No requests to that URL. Instead I get:
SecurityError
Joan Touzet created WHIMSY-260:
--
Summary: Cannot see prior comments on PMR reports
Key: WHIMSY-260
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WHIMSY-260
Project: Whimsy
Issue Type: Bug
an unregistered
address Joan Touzet mailto:jo...@atypical.net>>.
Two comments: why isn't from: able to be edited by the user? And where did the
email address come from? Shouldn't it be the agenda user's Apache
i...@apache.org?
Regards,
Craig
Begin forwarded message:
From: Joan Touzet
S
ed great news.
>
> I’m afraid I don’t have a strong opinion on how to make the tests more
> resilient to running in an emulated environment. Any of your suggestions are
> acceptable to me, assuming we can keep ppc64le support in scope.
>
> Adam
>
>> On May 4, 2019, at 12:0
it to support other configurations, pull requests
are always welcome. :D
Cheers,
Joan "moar CI" Touzet
On 2019-05-09 15:04, salsa-...@tut.by wrote:
> I can help to create automated provisioning of the system with the help of
> Chef software.
>
> Serge
>
> 02.05.2019,
On 2019-05-09 15:27, Geertjan Wielenga wrote:
> I'm not assuming at all that a hijab signifies sexism
Point of clarification: the women you described were wearing *burkas*,
not hijabs or niqabs.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/newsround/24118241
I'll comment more thoroughly on this thread later.
Gris, point of order,
Do you mean you want to migrate it to GH before you finish receiving
comments, etc.?
Or is the conversion process to occur after 11PM PT tomorrow?
-Joan
On 2019-05-09 15:18, Gris Cuevas wrote:
> Hi folks - anyone interested in helping me migrate the design doc to GitHub?
oan "I asked nicely, now I'm telling you" Touzet
On 2019-05-02 16:41, Joan Touzet wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> Lately, our Jenkins CI runs on master (after merges) have been failing a
> lot:
>
> https://s.apache.org/yuwY
>
> Just in the last run (#
Not sure if it's binding (I'm not on the ComDev PMC) but +1 from me.
-Joan
On 2019-05-04 7:52 p.m., Ross Gardler wrote:
+1
From: Shane Curcuru
Sent: Saturday, May 4, 2019 4:00 PM
To: dev@community.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] ComDev supports
ferent tag name
(unsupported-1.6.1, for example)?
What do you think?
Jonathan
On 4/30/19 11:47 PM, Joan Touzet wrote:
* Removed all tags that are no longer supported or have known security
issues. This includes versions 1.6.*, 1.7.1, 2.0.*, 2.1.*, and 2.2.*.
Hi again,
With the support of ASF Infra, we now are in a position to run arbitrary
alternative platforms in our CI builds. This is great news for the
people who have been waiting for ARM (aarch64), PowerPC/POWER (ppc64le),
mainframe (s390x), and other architecture supports.
However, we have
fn/4 in ReduceTest."test More complex array key view row testing"/1
[2019-05-03T22:49:38.382Z](elixir) lib/enum.ex:2941:
Enum.reduce_range_inc/4
[2019-05-03T22:49:38.383Z]test/reduce_test.exs:79: (test)
On 2019-05-03 2:38 p.m., Joan Touzet wrote:
Oops, my replies
Joan Touzet wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> Lately, our Jenkins CI runs on master (after merges) have been failing a
> lot:
>
> https://s.apache.org/yuwY
>
> Just in the last run (#537), we have failures in eunit tests for
> couch_mrview, mem3 and ddoc_cache that ne
Hi Daniel,
Thanks so much for being on top of this!
CouchDB did indeed get a copy (via me) and I did respond/complete the
survey.
-Joan
On 2019-05-02 20:14, Daniel Pono Takamori wrote:
> Hey Lance,
> Big Top, CouchDB and Cassandra didn't see this original email won't be able
> to see this
Hi Daniel,
Thanks so much for being on top of this!
CouchDB did indeed get a copy (via me) and I did respond/complete the
survey.
-Joan
On 2019-05-02 20:14, Daniel Pono Takamori wrote:
> Hey Lance,
> Big Top, CouchDB and Cassandra didn't see this original email won't be able
> to see this
Hi Daniel,
Thanks so much for being on top of this!
CouchDB did indeed get a copy (via me) and I did respond/complete the
survey.
-Joan
On 2019-05-02 20:14, Daniel Pono Takamori wrote:
> Hey Lance,
> Big Top, CouchDB and Cassandra didn't see this original email won't be able
> to see this
Hi everyone,
Lately, our Jenkins CI runs on master (after merges) have been failing a
lot:
https://s.apache.org/yuwY
Just in the last run (#537), we have failures in eunit tests for
couch_mrview, mem3 and ddoc_cache that need active investigation. [1]
Arguably, the reason no one is
Look for a .deleted directory under your data/ directory. The files may
not have been deleted but moved aside due to the
enable_database_recovery setting, or because the DB was still in use
when you restarted CouchDB.
Another useful command is:
$ du -sh /opt/couchdb/data/*
which should tell
Hello there,
You may have read about the recent breach of security at Docker Hub[1].
In light of this breach, and in the interest of security for all of our
users, today we have taken the following actions:
* Reset all passwords and tokens that were in use with Docker Hub.
(Apache CouchDB
appropriate:
https://github.com/apache/couchdb/blob/8ef42f7241f8788afc1b6e7255ce78ce5d5ea5c3/src/chttpd/src/chttpd.erl#L947-L949
Adam
On Apr 18, 2019, at 12:50 PM, Joan Touzet
wrote:
What happens when it turns out the client *hasn't* timed out and
we
just...hang up on them? Should
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WHIMSY-247?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Joan Touzet resolved WHIMSY-247.
Resolution: Fixed
I think this is fixed now; will reopen if not.
> Persist changed initi
Hi Paul - congratulations, and thank you for all your hard work!
On 2019-04-23 7:19, Myrle Krantz wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> Please welcome Paul Berschick as a committer for community development. He
> helped us put together the Apache Roadshow in Berlin last year, doing
> everything from booking
Welcome, Gris! I don't need to expect great things, because they've
already happened.
-Joan
On 2019-04-23 7:26, Myrle Krantz wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> Please welcome Gris Cuevas as the newest member of the Community
> Development PMC.
>
> Gris is helping out representing Apache at various
What happens when it turns out the client *hasn't* timed out and we
just...hang up on them? Should we consider at least trying to send back
some sort of HTTP status code?
-Joan
On 2019-04-18 10:58, Garren Smith wrote:
> I'm +1 on this. With partition queries, we added a few more timeouts that
>
On 2019-04-17 9:04 p.m., Griselda Cuevas wrote:
I want to understand how we
see and value the topic since I consider it an important influencer in the
D topic. More clearly - some projects are not diverse on the commercial
vendor affiliation dimension, which can create an environment not so
Sorry for the self-reply, this sentence:
On 2019-04-17 18:04, Joan Touzet wrote:
> The danger in writing it down is that it will change people's
> opinions of .
should read:
> the situation by implying the corporate relationship itself is what
> is driving the decision making, w
Sorry for the self-reply, this sentence:
On 2019-04-17 18:04, Joan Touzet wrote:
> The danger in writing it down is that it will change people's
> opinions of .
should read:
> the situation by implying the corporate relationship itself is what
> is driving the decision making, w
I'm generally in agreement with Rich, Jim, Shane, Sam and the other
"grey beards" who have responded on this thread already. We recognize
the individual, not the company, and the individual gets the merit.
That said, there are always rumours and scuttlebutt floating around of
this sort: "If
On 2019-04-14 3:03 p.m., dinesh.jo...@yahoo.com.INVALID wrote:
I would like to suggest another approach at measuring the funnel. I don't know
whether this is feasible either but its just an idea that I'd love some feedback
on. Most Apache projects seem to be using Jira. Contributors,
On 2019-04-13 2:37 a.m., Dinesh Joshi wrote:
Rich, Myrle – both of you made great points. I especially think non-code
contributions are critical and generally go unrecognized. They are
equally as important.
Regarding gathering data about individuals being nominated, perhaps
sending a survey to
Hi Sebastian,
> From: "sebb"
> > I believe reporter only currently pulls down commit statistics
> > from svn,
>
> Does it? Where is that presented?.
My mistake! I saw the commits@ mailing lists and realized that this
only shows what got sent to the mailing list. It's a stand-in for
now at
Hi everyone,
As a newly-elected board member, I'm discovering a blind spot
in the reporter.apache.org tool, specifically for projects that
have transitioned to git for version control and GitHub issues
for issue management.
I believe reporter only currently pulls down commit statistics
from svn,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WHIMSY-247?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16813596#comment-16813596
]
Joan Touzet commented on WHIMSY-247:
OK! This is good news. And I noticed when I went to make
Joan Touzet created WHIMSY-247:
--
Summary: Persist changed initials for report comments
Key: WHIMSY-247
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WHIMSY-247
Project: Whimsy
Issue Type: Task
Hi Maxim,
> From: "Maxim Solodovnik"
> To: dev@community.apache.org, "Joan Touzet"
> Sent: Thursday, April 4, 2019 12:03:39 PM
> Subject: Re: ASF Application for Google Season of Docs 2019
>
> If we (as the ASF) will participate in GSoD
> We nee
> From: "Maxim Solodovnik"
> To: dev@community.apache.org
> Sent: Thursday, April 4, 2019 11:20:55 AM
> Subject: Re: ASF Application for Google Season of Docs 2019
>
> Hello Adina,
>
> This make sense
>
> But these 1 or 2 tech writers will select from project ideas
> They can't just write
One parenthetical...
> From: "Adam Kocoloski"
>
> On a somewhat-related note, I have had conversations before with
> folks who are keen to adopt these sorts of fine-grained access
> control systems who said they actually prefer to have a 403
> Forbidden response list the set of privileges that
Sharan, might want to keep the ASF application if we want their help
with tech doc writing for things like the incubator, infra, etc. and
other internally-facing ASF stuff. Not sure it makes sense for those
groups to be individually reaching out on those topics.
-Joan
- Original Message
Any interest? Note: we'd need *2* mentors from CouchDB to help drive this.
-Joan
- Forwarded Message -
From: "Sharan Foga"
To: d...@community.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, 2 April, 2019 5:03:06 PM
Subject: ASF Application for Google Season of Docs 2019
Hi All
As mentioned the applications
Griselda Cuevas wrote:
> @joan - I also get a Pony, I requested the Jira ;)
Of course you do!
(Use a monospace font for best rendering...)
,--,
_ ___/ /\|
;( )__, )
; // '--;
\ |
^^
-Joan "Caaan do!" Touzet
Ahoy hoy! Glad to be here.
On 2019/04/02 17:10:45, Daniel Gruno wrote:
> Hi hi folks!
-Joan "time for another mail filter rule" Touzet
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: diversity-unsubscr...@apache.org
For additional commands,
Daniel wrote:
> Requested, and should be ready within an hour or two.
Thank you! You get a pony!
-Joan "JFDI" Touzet
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@community.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Daniel Gruno said:
> On 02/04/2019 11.34, Joan Touzet wrote:
> > Daniel said:
> >> On 02/04/2019 11.29, Daniel Gruno wrote:
> >>> On 02/04/2019 11.26, Joan Touzet wrote:
> >>>> Trying to cut through the bikeshedding:
> >>>>
> &g
Daniel said:
> On 02/04/2019 11.29, Daniel Gruno wrote:
> > On 02/04/2019 11.26, Joan Touzet wrote:
> >> Trying to cut through the bikeshedding:
> >>
> >> Daniel Gruno said:
> >>> I'd recommend a separate mailing list (to provide focus) a
Trying to cut through the bikeshedding:
Daniel Gruno said:
> I'd recommend a separate mailing list (to provide focus) and a JIRA,
> perhaps some place to put documents (either within the comdev svn
> area,
> or somewhere else if spun off), and then...just get to work :)
This is what Griselda
Thanks for this post, Shane. You share a number of my concerns.
I am absolutely not blind to opposition to some of the things I've
suggested, but I would argue that the thread on the topic has become
so negative and heated that informed discussion isn't useful.
Again I encourage others to listen
"Wade Chandler" wrote:
> On one hand an organization “can” actively keep
> people out based on personal attributes; intentional negative & bad;
> don’t see this here; if you do, please give direct links; most will
> certainly see that the same.
Naming and shaming in a public forum isn't a good
> TL;DR: identify a list of tangible deliverables, and I'll help you
> make it happen.
In the interest of not losing sight of the meritocracy debate, along
with the D work (which I'm happy to engage on, someone sign me up),
we need to actually solve the original "meritocracy" problem. I
proposed
Did they even ask us to help put them in touch with people?
How did they pick who they were going to email?
Can anyone take point in contacting their IRB and, well, not
to put a too fine a point on it: ratting them out?
This certainly was done without approval. And I don't know how
they
Hi Vladimir,
The people I know running this at scale simply don't log to localhost disk.
With everything heading out a udp logging port, this is simply never an issue.
Agree that this is a likely enhancement request; recommend that you log that
via GitHub:
A tested pull request that does the right thing and keeps the same uid/gid we
currently use would be welcomed and considered seriously.
I'm travelling and on holiday this week, but my $0.02:
Stop trying to find a single word for what we mean. It's too subtle:
> > When using the word 'Meritocracy', is is important to
> > explain on which merits the meritocracy is based :
> > -- community building
> > -- software
etc/local.ini and the entire etc/local.d directory
I will be back online Thursday before I can do anything. Sorry.
to please consider including
> some
> selfhealing/diagnostic tools in the distro - etop, observer, recon.
>
> On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 9:14 PM Joan Touzet
> wrote:
>
> > Not to pile on, but one other point: if you're logging to a slow
> > volume,
>
Thanks for these links, Jan. Nice to see the the training podling has
started, though it'll be a few months before we see assets coming out of
that I think.
>From the YouTube video this slide deck was shared:
https://www.slideshare.net/alanfgates/hortonworks-apache-training
What I'm taking
Dear Community,
The vote has now closed.
The results are:
+1 - 2 votes
+0 - 0 votes
-0 - 0 votes
-1 - 2 votes
The vote is FAILED.
Thanks,
Joan Touzet
there under the rfcs/
directory. You can now use Pull Requests to get feedback on
your submissions.
I will look into a script that watches for RFC pull requests
and emails the dev@ mailing list if any are proposed.
Thanks,
Joan Touzet
Tested on Microsoft Windows 10 r1709 using couchdb-glazier:
Signature: good
SHA256/516: good
make check: 100% pass
Windows installer: built
Windows installer then signed by Symantec: check
Installed from installer on Windows 7: check
Fauxton "Verify installation": all green
Version number :
this occurs (temporary
> or permanent suspension, for example) or a definition of what we
> would consider an occurrence. Obviously that is a hard problem and
> presumably the reason it hasn't yet been proposed.
>
> B.
>
> --
> Robert Samuel Newson
> rnew...@apache.org
+1 to my own proposal.
-Joan
- Original Message -
> From: "Joan Touzet"
> To: "CouchDB Developers"
> Sent: Tuesday, 5 March, 2019 3:18:01 PM
> Subject: [VOTE] Bylaws change: Establish a Request For Comments (RFC) process
> for major new contribution
(Revised: The Reply-To field on the last email was incorrect. I am
also including the diff of the proposed changes to this email per
request.)
PMC Members,
This is a VOTE to create or amend our official documents.
It establishes a new Qualified Lazy Majority voting type, and
(Revised: The Reply-To field on the last email was incorrect. I am
also including the diff of the proposed changes to this email per
request.)
PMC Members,
This is a VOTE to create or amend our official documents.
It establishes a new Request For Comments (RFC) process through
PMC Members,
This is a VOTE to create or amend our official documents.
It establishes a new Request For Comments (RFC) process through which
all major changes to Apache CouchDB must pass.
This includes modifying the Bylaws to explain the process, as well as
adding the new RFC template.
There
PMC Members,
This is a VOTE to create or amend our official documents.
It establishes a new Qualified Lazy Majority voting type, and amends
the bylaws to use this new type for RFC votes only.
This vote depends on the RFC vote passing.
The git branch with the proposed further changes to the
th spouses equally is a good compromise that is building trust
> rather than assuming distrust.
> Forgive the analogy.
> De : Joan Touzet
> Envoyé : vendredi 15 février 2019 20:00:14
> À : priv...@couchdb.apache.org
> Cc : dev@couchdb.apache.org
> Objet : Re: [DISCUSS] Prop
to resolve it.
-Joan
- Original Message -
> From: "Joan Touzet"
> To: dev@couchdb.apache.org
> Sent: Friday, March 1, 2019 3:48:29 PM
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CouchDB 2.3.1 RC2
>
> Tested just now on Windows 10.
>
> Signature: passes
>
> > about hard failing the test suite if a sub-group fails, but the
> > 2.3.x log does not exhibit this.
> >
> > Obligatory statement that votes don’t happen on IRC.
> >
> > Best
> > Jan
> > —
> >
> > [1]: full log here:
> > htt
Chiming in to agree with option 2, and if that's too small for
you, you should be able to use either an cloud backend, or a
local file system approach.
Cloud backend should be abstracted to the point where you could
build support for something other than S3 - for instance, B2[1]
would be lovely -
Based on discussion with Russell Branca (chewbranca) in IRC, we need to
abort this RC vote as he is effectively voting -1. Here's the full
transcript of our discussion:
16:06 <+Wohali> chewbranca: you there? are you seeing these eunit
context setup
Hi there,
As part of ASF's move of all Git repositories to GitHub, some of our
newer repos started having their notifications routed to the wrong
mailing list (dev@ instead of notifications@).
This should be fixed now, see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-17917
Committers/PMC: When
Check that the exact same *crypt text* for your [admins] users is
specified on all nodes. The exact same line should appear in all 3
.ini files.
Check that all nodes have the exact same [httpd] secret value in
their ini files.
Check that all nodes have the exact same [couchdb] uuid specified
in
sorry everyone, out for medical reasons until Friday, will try and test
then on Windows and give a vote then
can you extend the vote for me? thanks
-Joan
- Original Message -
> From: "Nick Vatamaniuc"
> To: dev@couchdb.apache.org
> Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2019 12:26:41 PM
>
Would it be too much work to prototype both and check CRUD timings for
each across a small variety of documents?
-Joan
- Original Message -
> From: "Paul Davis"
> To: dev@couchdb.apache.org
> Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2019 5:41:23 PM
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] : things we need to
Julian asked:
> Re. "owning our data": we do own our source code but what about all
> the conversational metadata in GH? In the Subversion project we have
> a GH mirror of the code but pull requests and code comments etc. in
> GH aren't even copied to the Subversion PMC mailing lists, apart
>
latter method is not reliable, as many
> people use their apache.org address all of the time.
>
> --
> Robert Samuel Newson
> rnew...@apache.org
>
> On Fri, 15 Feb 2019, at 18:47, Joan Touzet wrote:
> > Garren,
> >
> > RFCs are intended for major ch
?
-Joan
- Original Message -
> From: "Garren Smith"
> To: "priv...@couchdb.apache.org Private" , "Joan
> Touzet"
> Cc: "CouchDB Developers"
> Sent: Friday, February 15, 2019 2:56:04 AM
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Proposed Bylaws
happening.
-Joan
- Original Message -
> From: "Robert Samuel Newson"
> To: "Joan Touzet"
> Cc: "CouchDB Developers" , "CouchDB PMC"
>
> Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2019 4:46:35 PM
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Proposed Bylaws chang
straightforward.
Why not put in this "backstop?"
-Joan
- Original Message -
> From: "Robert Samuel Newson"
> To: "CouchDB PMC"
> Cc: "Joan Touzet" , "CouchDB Developers"
>
> Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2019 4:26:31 PM
> Subj
Hi everyone,
There appears to be general consensus on the RFC process, with no
objections to the proposal itself.
I'd like to propose the following changes to our bylaws:
https://github.com/apache/couchdb-www/commit/8ae3a5a230b1717d7affe23625eeb288635aa542
Quick summary:
* Added the RFC
Hi Paul,
As you know, I try my hardest to post well-researched comments to this
mailing list, and this time I fell short of that. Please accept my
apologies. Let me try and re-frame the problem, and respond to your
criticisms.
My point is: we need more public design discussions and review, and
Thanks for taking the 2.3.1 release, Jan! I've added a couple of
additional suggested commits on the 1908 comment thread.
-Joan
- Original Message -
> From: "Jan Lehnardt"
> To: "CouchDB Developers"
> Sent: Thursday, February 7, 2019 10:41:49 AM
> Subject: [DISCUSS] Release 2.3.1
>
>
a GH Issue monitoring bot?
-Joan
- Original Message -
> From: "Jan Lehnardt"
> To: "CouchDB Developers" , "Joan Touzet"
>
> Sent: Thursday, February 7, 2019 5:33:00 AM
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] Proposed new RFC process
>
> I’m fa
Hi everyone,
One thing that has plagued the CouchDB project for a while is the
introduction of new features without much discussion prior to the
feature landing.
To put all the cards on the table: it is good that IBM/Cloudant have
been benevolent and have contributed significant new
401 - 500 of 1602 matches
Mail list logo
