Question: Does anyone know why the Americans didn't use the
E-1? I have
always wondered about this.
The T1 was originally developed by ATT in 1957 or 58. It was later adopted
by ANSI.
The CCITT (Now ITU) standardized the CEPT E1 for most of the world at (I
believe) a later date.
I'd
... The only thing I don't like
is that MPLS may be in the new lab, and that's not a technology that's
really taken off yet.
Well, certain technologies that are being removed, like say IPX NLSP, didn't
exactly take the world by storm either. So you could say that you're simply
replacing one
hahaha
I found it eventually, for some reson when I've been going to the BOTTOM of
the For Sale list, the post box did not appear, moments after I tried this
yesterday, I was able to post :)
Messing with your minds? Unsure, but it was messing with mine!
Message Posted at:
hallo,
Has anyone received a FAIL result for any beta CCNP
taken in feb-march 02 ?
I have mates who received their Pass results, but I
received none.(2 beta taken).
Do they first send the pass and then the fail ?
Thanks !
__
Do You Yahoo!?
I guess my question is why didn't we upgrade then. Don't you think the
E-1 is better? With the same line you get 7 extra B channels.
Hu...maybe the French made this and it is all political!
Theo
Question: Does anyone know why the Americans didn't use the
E-1? I have
always
Think of how much it would cost to upgrade all the Class4/5 switches in
America.
Mike Graham
CCNp, CCDP
- Original Message -
From:
To:
Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 7:55 AM
Subject: Re: out of band in band [7:46530]
I guess my question is why didn't we upgrade then. Don't you think
I THINK, it's because the Americans brought the Technology out first (when
it was new), the Europeans waited a while until it had matured and advanced.
Japan followed the Americans straight away and the rest of the world came
along at the end and followed the newer technology brought out by the
Yes, I read the RFC today and its 4bytes.
I will not forget this.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=46560t=46534
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report
i got my fail and pass notices at the same time.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=46561t=46556
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and
Yeah I know but this is a questionsome Japanese have asked me here in
Japan and I have never really known. I always assumed it had to do with
economic politics that was all.
Michael Graham
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
06/14/2002 04:29 PM
Please respond to Michael Graham
To:
I know this is going to sound terrible and I really don't want to single you
or anybody else out. But honestly, if somebody didn't realize that you can
do Dlsw+ on Ethernet-only , then that person probably shouldn't be thinking
of doing the lab and instead should probably be trying to get more
Could you post the output from a
'debug dialer events' command. Then
we can see the reason that routerB
initiates the call.
__
Thomas Crowe
Senior Systems Engineer / Senior Architect
EMC Proven Master Architect
CTS Professional Services - Atlanta
All,
I have 2 sites. We currently get full routing tables from uunet and ATT
into a single router. We want to put a second router at another site and
run IBGP between just those two. We will have two routers between the two
running BGP. I guess it would look something like this:
in fact, we used DLSW+ extensively in the production network around the
region without even a single ring. The ring has been all converted abt 4
yrs ago ;)
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=46566t=46481
--
FAQ,
I have a Pix firewall 515UR, I was reading about the SQLNET command,
seems like this is for Oracle. What about for Microsoft SQL 2000?
Also I am thinking of using Cut though Proxy from inside to DMZ to get
to my web server on the DMZ, I am just wondering how this is going to
work with my load
Wanted to let the group know my approach to CCIE written and how I made it.
I got my CCNA in March 2000 (it was a beta )
and CCDA in Dec 2000. and straight to CCIE.
Use the CCNP/DP books to study and practised a lot in my home lab.
Other sourse used
CCIE Routing and Switching Book from Cisco
I have a vendor who is dialing into my network via isdn. They are initiating
the call with a Lucent Superpipe router. I have a 2620 on my end. My vendor
is telling me that his equipment can not dial-up the second B channel and
that I have to bring up the second line. His equipment does not allow
Try user: admin pswd: system
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Wigle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 9:49 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Default Password [7:46536]
I have some old client software for a wireless LAN card.
I would like to set a WEP key but you
I have a Catalyst WS-C3550-24 switch with the default IOS 12.1(8) EA1b.
I would like to do Layer 3 switching; I think I read that I need to
upgrade the IOS. Does anyone know what the cost is to upgrade this
switch to have layer-3 capabilities?
Thanks
Brian
Message Posted at:
do the ppp multi and have the int come up after the first chanel has a load
of 1.
Chris Dumais wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
I have a vendor who is dialing into my network via isdn. They are
initiating
the call with a Lucent Superpipe router. I have a 2620 on
From my understanding in IS-IS a level-1/2 router will set the ATT bit on
level-1 LSA's only when it has an active level-2 adjacency. All level-1
routers receiving an LSA with the ATT bit set will install a default route
to the advertising router. In the event of multiple LSA's with the ATT bit
I believe you need a frame-relay map statement for CLNS. Something like
this...
frame-relay map clns 100 broadcast
This should allow IS-IS to work over a point-to-multipoint FR NBMA network.
If the network consists of a full or partial mesh I'd consider using mesh
groups to limit LSP flooding.
It's probably 2K to upgrade, but check the IOS dl site..
Brian Zeitz wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
I have a Catalyst WS-C3550-24 switch with the default IOS 12.1(8) EA1b.
I would like to do Layer 3 switching; I think I read that I need to
upgrade the IOS.
You need to use p2p sub interfaces. ISIS and multipoint interfaces don't
work together.
---
Mike Bernico [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Illinois Century Network http://www.illinois.net
(217) 557-6555
-Original Message-
From: Cisco Nuts [mailto:[EMAIL
From the hardcopy issue of InfoWorld (June 10, 2002, Issue 23, p. 43):
Routing, the core technology of the Internet, is emerging as a way to
coordinate interaction among SOAP actors on a global scale. SOAP
routing is described in two of Microsoft's Global XML Architecture
specifications.
I had the same queston so I opened a TAC case to get an answer. Here is my
first response for those interested...
*** NOTES LOG 13-JUN-2002 16:26:43 PST, emailcio, Action Type: Action ***
Technology(T1): LAN Switching
Sub-Technology(T2): Cat3550
Problem Summary(T3): Upgrading Software and
Removing and reintalling the program should take care of it.
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/102/wlan/pwrec-2.html#cem
Thanks,
Shawn
Kevin Wigle wrote:
I have some old client software for a wireless LAN card.
I would like to set a WEP key but you need the default password to get into
Hi All,
We are in the process of upgrading our Network infrastructure, which has
CISCO routers and CAT5500 switches. During our preliminary evaluation, we
are considering also 3COM XRN switches instead of CAT6500 or CAT4000. Has
anyone experience with 3COM XRN switches? If so please let met
Would a 3550 SMI (much cheaper version than the 3550 EMI) be comparable to
the 2950 for filling out a RS lab? It seems the lower 3550 and 2950 are
very similar.
I think an important point is whether the enhancements in the EMI over SMI
versions of the 3550 series will be tested in the lab? SMI
Hi all. Does anyone know the maximum # of routers allowed in a HSRP
group? I've read through the RFC and don't see this limit mentioned but
a coworker says it's 4.
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at
It's a matter of where signaling is used, as I understand it. If
signaling/control for the routing of a call happens through the B
channels, then it's in-band b/c part of the bandwidth of the bearer
channels is taken up by signaling/call control. D channel is considered
out-of-band b/c it's not
There are a number of vendors creating XML switches, see:
http://www.nwfusion.com/news/2002/132046_04-29-2002.html.
From my perspective, I think of these Content Aware Switches specializing in
XML. These have some things in common with Cisco Content Service Switches,
but are tailored to XML
I just checked with CDW, its 1500$ for the upgrade for the SMI to EDI
for the 3550. Which brings me to my next question. If I have 2 switches,
in a cluster, do I need a license for both. Man, $3000 to do layer 3
switching!
-Original Message-
From: jeff sicuranza [mailto:[EMAIL
CJ - I was interested to find out what type of lab you have. I have one
myself and wanted to know if I needed more or get rid of somethings that
aren't relevant.
I have 3-2501's, 1-Cat 5K, 1-AS5200, and 2-2900XL's
I heard they are removing TR and Cat 5K after 10/2002 but I won't be ready
Isn't the command to set the load dialer load-threshold 1? Doesn't this
initiate a call. I don't think I can use this if I am not allowed to dial my
vendor. Is there another way to set the load?
Chris Dumais, CCNP, CNA
Lan Analyst
IT - NSS Networking Services Team
Maine Medical Center
I know I've done four at one time (long story) without incident; I
generally don't like to have more than two...how many are you trying to
configure? Why?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Phil Wallisch
Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 10:19
Listen closely...
Look into the light and don't be afraid, resistance is
futile
--- John Neiberger
wrote:
I just don't get this. I'm looking at the IOS
releases for the Cat6k
and I see there is now 12.1(11b)E4 and we're running
12.1(11b)E3. So, I
check to see if there are any new
At 8:23 AM -0400 6/14/02, brian kastor wrote:
All,
I have 2 sites. We currently get full routing tables from uunet and ATT
into a single router. We want to put a second router at another site and
run IBGP between just those two. We will have two routers between the two
running BGP. I guess
ISIS works on frame relay physical, multipoint
subinterfaces, and point-to-point subinterfaces. The
key issue is that ISIS only supports two network types,
broadcast and point-to-point. There is no way to change
network types as there is in OSPF.
Frame relay physical and multipoint
After a quick search, here is what I found on the cisco website
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/cc/pd/iosw/prodlit/1749_pp.htm
Download Information
There are two software images for all Catalyst 3550-24 and 3550-48
products-the Standard Multilayer Software Image (SMI) and the Enhanced
I know you can do 4 as I have a few times. I don't know the max but I
can't think of any reason to have more than 4 routers in an HSRP group.
In fact I don't even like doing 4 and the only reason I have ever
configured 4 was dual 6509's with dual sups and MSFC's in the days
before SRM was
Lidiya, Thanks for your help. I didn't realize that not all newer IOS images
support the Wic-1enet card.
Lidiya White wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Try 12.2.8T. Main code line doesn't support WIN-1ENET=
Guy,
In JUNOS BGP, everything is in a group, in IOS it is called peer-group, the
purpose is to group neighbors sharing similar configurations, if IOS has
some problems when providing this convenience, I think I would want to call
it a bug.
I am not following the explanation from the web page,
Would it be accurate to say that the XML switch is located at the
edges of the network, possibly even that it is an endsystem with
routing functions? Would there be XML switches in the core network?
Where would it be located in the following diagram?:
Brian,
All the licensing of software for Cisco products is per server/device
unless specifically stated otherwise. Usually those special situations
involve explicit backup/failover, and the second unit can't stand
alone. The PIX and CiscoSecure ACS for UNIX are two products where this
is the
More accurately dialer load-threshold set the traffic level which is
required to have another call initiated. If the Lucent will not bring
up a second link it must not support multilink so I don't know what good
it will do to try and force a second connection. You can fet a cheap
800 series
Like I said in my previous post similar to Brad's...
It'll PROMPT you about if you want to change/add any new
features/configurations. Can't remember the syntax exactly, but it's
the only question prompt you get before it does the Saving to flash...
It's really that simple.
When you answer
Yes, I think you'll have to upgrade them both if you want the same
functionality on both of them.
thanks,
-Brad Ellis
CCIE#5796 (RS / Security)
Network Learning Inc
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.optsys.net (Cisco hardware)
Brian Zeitz wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
I
Yes, you need to install the OS on there again. You might as well put on
6.2(1) while you're at it. Ive been using it for a couple weeks and it's
been pretty stable.
thanks,
-Brad Ellis
CCIE#5796 (RS / Security)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cisco home labs: www.optsys.net
Rick wrote in message
[EMAIL
I am already ccnp and have another year before I expire but for personal
reason I took the new switching exam today. I passed it but I did not do
as well as I wanted and was suprised at the content of the exam, also they
have raised the bar of this exam it takes a 776 to pass or was that the
same
I'm scheduled to take the lab test on 9 Jan '03. I would like to swap this
date for an earlier date, preferably within the Sep/Oct '02 time frame.
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=46603t=46603
I only see the BEFORE and not AFTER. Anyway, sho
dialer on rtr-A should tell you the reason why the
call was initiated. Are you running any routing
protocols on the BRI int?
--- Original Message ---
From: Thomas Crowe
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: ISDN -- challenge! [7:46496]
Could
From router B, I pinged a boggus destination. This triggered the bri
interface on router B. Here is the output of the debug dialer events from
Router A. You can see that router A (for no apparent reason) is trying to
call router B (even though it is router B who initiated the call.) Of course
the
Brian,
I think you could either configure R2 and R3 for bgp or use conditional
advertisement to inject the default route from R1 and R4(please search CCO
for this). Of course, you want to make R1 the preferred exit point.
HTHs
Kent
- Original Message -
From: brian kastor
To:
Sent:
No I am not running any routing protocol!
Here are my configs:
isdn1 (router A)
isdn1#show run
Building configuration...
Current configuration : 1166 bytes
!
version 12.2
service timestamps debug uptime
service timestamps log uptime
no service password-encryption
!
hostname isdn1
!
enable
All the samples of the command show dialer have the line Time until
disconnect For some reason, it doesn't show that for me. Is it IOS
version? Could anyone try and see if it shows for you?
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=46610t=46610
Yeah you guys are right about no reason for more than 4. I was just
curious. It came up b/c I've got 2 WAN routers attached to 2 6509s with
dual MSFC's as well. Just in theory I was thinking about what if all 6
were involved in a group. Once again what's the point? Am I going to
have 6 so
Thanks Radford, I saw the same thing but it was still unclear from Cisco's
tac response. Is the downloadable file the CD-3550-EMI= and all you need is
a valid CCO account to upgrade? Or do you have to spend x amount of $$ to
purchase a special download for the CD-3550? According to the response
Doh!
Thanks for info I think
I'd like to see the test plan for it.
Does it look pretty (Yes/No)
Does it give Marketing something to spout off about (Yes/No)
End
Everyone seems to be doing the Microsoft thing at the moment (Live Beta
testing). Foundry's Ironview is entertaining as
Kris,
in-band-signaling describes situation when signaling is transported
through the same communication channel as data. out-of-band is when
it is transported through the separate channel.
ISDN (no matter if it is T1 or E1 variant) uses out-of-band signaling,
because signaling is using D
I am trying to upload a config for a pix, one that I know is good and works.
I do a write erase on the pix
to blow the old one away and then do un upload via tftp but then when I do a
wr mem, it still has the
old config. Any ideas?
Steven Kell Bates
Senior Network Engineer
Technology
This may sound daft, and I'm almost embarrassed to suggest it, but will you
humour me and remove the ip host isdn2 2065 1.1.1.1 command from
Router-isdn1.
Distant memories are haunting me.
I haven't got an ISDN simulator to play with at home, but I'm stumped too.
Gaz
Pierre-Alex Guanel
Compare that price ($3,000) to what two-24 or 48 port routers would cost.
Brian Zeitz wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
I just checked with CDW, its 1500$ for the upgrade for the SMI to EDI
for the 3550. Which brings me to my next question. If I have 2 switches,
You have default routes pointed towards one another. You ping an address
that doesn't exist on either router. The first sends it off to the second.
The second doesn't know what to do with it so sends it on to its default
which is the first.
Try doing a no keepalive on some of your unused FastE
Steven,
Write erase erases the configuration written to memory (stored in
NVRAM). The currently running configuration remains in tact until you
reboot the system. Basically, what you're doing is erasing the stored
config while keeping your current config, tftping a new config to the
stored
Jeff,
You can download the file, but legally you are only authorized to use it
if your switch was purchased with the enhanced software, or if you
purchase the upgrade.
Cisco does watch who downloads which software, and checks it against
what the downloading user is entitled to. If it doesn't
Thanks Shawn. I know this is splitting hairs but I just wanted to clarify a
few things so folks on this board and myself are clear on the policy and we
do not end up in Cisco jail, purchase the wrong switch options or damage the
switch by loading the wrong software.
So what you are saying is
If you're going to upgrade to 6.2, you may as well just upgrade it normally
(not through ROMMON) and then use the activation-key command.
Became available in 6.2 so you don't need to re-install the image to
re-enter activation key.
Must admit I've not done it on 501's yet, so anyone please
Hi All,
Is necessary to encrypt the comunication that goes over frame-relay links or
the frame-relay virtual circuits (PVC/SVC) mechanisms are secure enough to
protect my data?
Thanks
--
Eng. Paulo Roque
Network Engineer
It would appear that the changes to the Lab have been clarified and updated,
and it looks like the removal of the indicated topics won't actually happen
until Nov 4th now:
Lab Exam Content and Equipment Changes
CCIE Candidates should note the following changes to the technical content
and
No problem ... splitting hairs is how technical people work. :)
Your interpretation is correct.
The only actual difference between the SMI and EMI switches is the
software loaded on them. Everything else is a matter of licensing.
Loading the EMI software on a switch without an EMI license is
Hi,
I've seemed to have found a stange issue with IPX Eigrp when running it over
a Frame Relay setup.
Using ver 12.0(9) of IOS.
I can see the other router's IPX network when typing in the 'show
frame-relay map' command but can't get IPX Eigrp to establish an adjacency
at all.
I've typed in
Frank Merrill wrote:
Therefore, effective November 4th, 2002, the following topics will no
longer
be tested on the CCIE Routing and Switching exam:
IGRP
Token Ring
Token Ring Switching
IPX
I wonder, will the new 640-60x tests drop IPX?
-- TT
Message Posted at:
perhaps you have some configs you are willing to share?
Karen Menpes wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Hi,
I've seemed to have found a stange issue with IPX Eigrp when running it
over
a Frame Relay setup.
Using ver 12.0(9) of IOS.
I can see the other
The way I read this, between 9/1 and 11/4 there will still be token ring
switches in the Lab, and you may still have to be able to work with them.
Make sense?
Frank Merrill wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
It would appear that the changes to the Lab have been
Hi,
I was just about ready to take 640-506 (Support) when they changed the
test. Has anyone taken it yet? If so can you comment on any new topic...I
cannot find a list of new topics on cco or anywhere else for that mattter.
Dan
Message Posted at:
You have default routes pointed towards one another. You ping an address
that doesn't exist on either router. The first sends it off to the second.
The second doesn't know what to do with it so sends it on to its default
which is the first.
I do agree with your statements ... However, what is
Gaz, you are going to have to educate me on cultural issues ...
What is wrong with those numbers ?
(ip host isdn2 2065 1.1.1.1)
Pierre-Alex
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=46631t=46496
--
FAQ, list archives,
Paulo Roque wrote:
Hi All,
Is necessary to encrypt the comunication that goes over frame-relay links
or
the frame-relay virtual circuits (PVC/SVC) mechanisms are secure enough to
protect my data?
I think that this is pretty subjective. What is the value of the data
that is
those interested in one vendor's opinion regarding security of anythig over
frame relay or other private lines might be interested in this:
http://www.milgo.com/rdg/products/ds/ds1462/DS1462.htm
formerly Racal-Milgo, Milgo Solutions has been selling product like this for
several years now.
HTH
I tell you this is becoming utter nonsense. As I mentioned in an older post
I picked up an awesome 5505 for a song and I was expecting to use it to
prepare for my first lab attempt on 9/9.
ThenÂ… this news comes out about the 3550. Okay no problem, if I nail the lab
the first time(I wish! and
It looks to be the same as 506 to me:
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/10/wwtraining/certprog/testing/current_exam
s/640-606.html
Penn Daniel wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Hi,
I was just about ready to take 640-506 (Support) when they changed the
test. Has
I see your point. I don't know the answer. May I suggest that you first
remove that ip host statement that Gaz mentioned (it uses the name isdn2
which is the host name of your other router. I'm not sure if it will confuse
your router). Then test. If the initial problem continues, then try my
I will be taking it next week for a client commitment. The objectives
are located here
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/10/wwtraining/certprog/testing/current_
exams/640-606.html
-Original Message-
From: Penn Daniel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 1:31 PM
To:
I read that the 2600 router (or definitely higher model routers) have
IDS built in, but if you bought any Pix Firewall it wouldn't have IDS.
Am I mistaken on this? So the most people who want IDS who cannot afford
/ justify (just yet) and IDS box are using Snort? I have a pix 515UR,
and if I read
congrats!!.
J.
CJ wrote: Wanted to let the group know my approach to CCIE written and
how I made it.
I got my CCNA in March 2000 (it was a beta )
and CCDA in Dec 2000. and straight to CCIE.
Use the CCNP/DP books to study and practised a lot in my home lab.
Other sourse used
CCIE Routing
PIX's and routers capable of running IDS run a very limited version of IDS.
I believe they only catch 59 signatures which isn't very much. It's not bad
for a small company that has a PIX that would like to start down the path of
having a true IDS some day.
I'm not sure what you mean about Snort
Brian,
If you have full meshed IBGP sessions then r1 will automatically get the
route to 12.X.X.X in case link to UUNET failed. Or you have to use r1 and r2
as the route reflectors.
Hope this helps,
J.
brian kastor wrote: All,
I have 2 sites. We currently get full routing tables from uunet
Oh you had to ruin it and make me explain my half-arsed guestimate shot in
the dark theory :-)
My reasoning was based only on the fact that isdn2 is the exact hostname of
the other router, and I was just wondering whether it was causing confusion
somehow.
But... I think I changed my mind.
Can
There's nothing wrong with knowing the IOS based switches just on principal,
as one probably installs more of them in a job then the 6500's. The only
problem left with the new switches is no in-line power until next year when
802.3af is ratified.
--
RFC 1149 Compliant.
jeff sicuranza wrote
How about ratio of set-based to ios-based commands. Thanks.
On Fri, 14 Jun 2002 12:46:16 -0400 Elijah Savage
writes:
I am already ccnp and have another year before I expire but for
personal
reason I took the new switching exam today. I passed it but I did
not do
as well as I wanted and
Just loaded 6.2 onto a 501... If you're loading the new OS ver, it's going
to ask you to either retain the original key or enter a new one; so it's
just as easy to enter the new key if you have it available.
MKJ
-Original Message-
From: Gaz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June
Set based command greatly out weighed the IOS commands when dealing with
multicast it is mainly going to be in set based format anyway because of
the hardware.
How about ratio of set-based to ios-based commands. Thanks.
On Fri, 14 Jun 2002 12:46:16 -0400 Elijah Savage
writes:
I am already
I stand corrected on the shunning part (thanks Glenn). You can use shun
with 6.1, but I am not sure about the details for allowing this to happen
dynamically using CSPM. I hesitate to ever implement dynamic shunning as a
savvy attacker can use that to shun valid sources as a form of DoS.
John
Do you have the link for this change? I've just searched CCO, the CCIE
what's new area specifically, and I see no mention of this anywhere.
- Original Message -
From: Frank Merrill
To:
Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 3:43 PM
Subject: Cisco Lab Changes..Updated [7:46623]
It would appear
Brian,
We can both justify and afford a commercial IDS but choose Snort. What do
see as drawbacks to Snort?
Do you have a connection to the Internet? If so, what makes you think you
don't need an IDS? Get Snort up and running. You might be surprised.
We're running Snort on a Sun 220R. I
Sorry Gaz, I did not mean to spoil to the suspense. I thought you meant the
humbers 2065 1.1.1.1 were unlucky numbers. Something like :) That is
why I asked you to explain if there was any cultural issues with my numbers
...
Anyway,I am redoing the exercise right now with Fast Ethenernet
Chuck wrote:
The way I read this, between 9/1 and 11/4 there will still be
token ring
switches in the Lab, and you may still have to be able to work
with them.
Make sense?
Makes sense to me! I suspect, based on that new info, that all of those
topics will have to be dealt with now until
Steven A. Ridder wrote:
There's nothing wrong with knowing the IOS based switches just
on principal,
as one probably installs more of them in a job then the
6500's. The only
problem left with the new switches is no in-line power until
next year when
802.3af is ratified.
--
Right,
You should be able to see if you passed on the cisco certmanag
ira wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
hallo,
Has anyone received a FAIL result for any beta CCNP
taken in feb-march 02 ?
I have mates who received their Pass results, but I
received none.(2 beta
1 - 100 of 122 matches
Mail list logo
