In article , [EMAIL PROTECTED]
says...
> Gaz wrote:
> >
> > I would have thought Windows 98 would accept something like:
> >
> > route add 100.100.100.240 mask 255.255.255.240 [default gateway]
>
> It depends on the host's own address. And I'
ific route. Makes sense I guess. And then it does behave correctly
> when I add a host-speciif route (e.g., it does what the route tells it to
do.)
>
> ___
>
> Priscilla Oppenheimer
> www.troubleshootingnetworks.com
> www.priscilla.com
>
> >
> > Not that you'
will still avoid it at all costs.
With the internet (DNS), I think it's too much of a bodge not to cause
problems in the long run.
Gaz
In article ,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] says...
> To all,
>
> In 6.2 of the FOS you CAN do this :-).
>
> You just have a situation of overlapping
Thanks.
> > steven
Are you saying that there is some PC software which will put them in the
right format for Cisco.
I'm sceptical, but would be good.
Gaz
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=56386&t=53866
0.100.100.100 255.255.255.0
route add 100.100.100.10 mask 255.255.255.255 [default gateway]
Not that you'd want to do it, but just wondering.
Cheers,
Gaz
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=56363&t=56347
-
ld have thought that VRRP would have been developed from some of
the proprietary protocols so I would have thought that it would have at
least equalled them?
I'll have a read of the RFC.
Gaz
In article , Priscilla says...
> The RFC for VRRP (2338) says this:
>
> Once Master el
oys the subnet it's being used for.
I've messed with "vrrp 1 preempt delay 60", but this seems to be for
backup routers only and doesn't apply to the master.
Any thoughts?
Gaz
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=55429&t=554
In article , [EMAIL PROTECTED]
says...
> I forgot how to change the telnet port in the router from 23.
So did I.
Don't think you can, but no doubt someone will correct me if wrong.
What's the reason?
SSH help at all?
Gaz
> Thanks
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.c
for the
bigger Pix's (525) are about #450 (GBP).
The smaller ones are much cheaper starting at about 40 GBP for the 501
and rising.
Gaz
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=55414&t=55200
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
What about Software Bug Toolkit!
Where do you reckon that belongs?
Ahhh - Troubleshooting Tools!
Nope!
Configuration Tools.
Wot?
In article , [EMAIL PROTECTED]
says...
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
> Persio Pucci
> Sent: Mon
all the routers there, rather than going to a different place for each
router (if that's the way it's going).
Gaz
In article ,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] says...
> I'm seeing more integration between the marketing materials and the
> technical materials. As expected, the marketing s
place"
Can't knock it really though. I have worked with masses of different
products over the years, and in my view, one of the best things about
Cisco is the availability and quality of information on their web site.
Gaz
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/
n Checkpoint, although I haven't gone for the
qualifications in Cisco yet. The best place I have found for Firewall-1
is www.phoneboy.com.
He is excellent.
The best place for the Pix is still CCO as far as I know.
Gaz
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.
? but to be honest I don't
care. The XP machine can be re-built in minutes (ish).
I don't have the problem of remote power on, as I have a much more
complicated and infinitely more expensive device which powers everything
on when needed. Unfortunately she's not always in when I cal
u know that
you're on the active Pix, but by console you need to do a show fail to
make sure the device you're on is primary active or secondary active
before you make changes.
Regards,
Gaz
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=51497&t=
stions. Anybody fancy
having a go at explaining the options.
Thanks,
Gaz
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=51472&t=51472
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.htm
w people asked me for a copy last time and my dial-up connection got
hammered, so if you'd like a copy I dumped it on an old web page. This
is not a plug, it's just a page I used to sell my road bike and it's
gone.
Go to www.bikespace.co.uk and click on the download button.
Pleas
I think list price is about #60 sterling so I would imagine that's about 100
US dollars (list price)
Gaz
""Elijah Savage III"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Does anyone know what the price is for ordering the 3DES sof
Is it really the source port?
Normally the destination port is UDP 514.
Does it care what the source port is?
Gaz
""HORVATH TAMAS"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Helo!
>
> To Neal Rauhauser : If you don't specify
e to be read by
someone who has.
Good luck
Gaz
""John Chang"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> This is not intended to offend anyone: Just thought professionals could
be
> just that and wanted an objective answer if you had used a De
ibility (to the provider).
Or am I still messed up? :-)
Gaz
""Priscilla Oppenheimer"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Gaz wrote:
> >
> > Bit embarrassed. You say you may have simplified it too much,
> > but my brain
&g
ther than Burst size. Burst size makes it
more sense.
So do different providers have different time intervals to calculate mean
rate from Burst size or is there a recognised standard. I take it that the
longer the Tc the better (for the customer)?
Help - Frame is my bogey subject
Gaz
&qu
d now. I'm wasting my
time with him.
:-)
Gaz
""Priscilla Oppenheimer"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Robert D. Cluett wrote:
> >
> > I like this statement
> >
> > "Times have changed, he said. Six y
ds you don't need to reload the image.
Just use "activation key"
Gaz
""NetEng"" wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> So Cisco sells a firewall with no encryption and then forces you to buy a
> smartnet contract so you can download the lastest IOS
Not sure whether Cisco could close them down if they wanted.
Wouldn't like to be on Cisco's side as they roll in to China.
They can probably do enough business in their own part of the worls to keep
the family fed and watered.
Do China abide by everyone elses laws?
Dunno...
""Priscilla Op
try to connect:
logging on
logging console 4 (or 5)
Let us know results.
Gaz
""Magdy Ibrahim"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hi all,
> I have PIX firewall with 6.0(1) and I am running my mail server behind it
> and it
people realise that it's not a
qualification, just a basic test to prove you might be worthy of starting
the long path to CCIE.
My two penneth.
Gaz
""Scott"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> This is a good thing. Although,
eople have come across
limitations/issues.
I tend to agree with the view "Right box for the job", i.e. don't make the
Pix do things it's not made for, but if pushed into the situation, how does
it compare.
Cheers,
Gaz
""Kevin O'Gilvie"" wrote in me
omatically puts them back (in the same way that it automatically
put them there in the first place)
As always...let me know if I'm talking rubbish.
Gaz
""Mark W. Odette II"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I believe the answer
I reckon you typo'd with the third line Philip.
How's this:
access-list 1 permit 10.10.10.32 0.0.0.1
access-list 1 permit host 10.10.10.34
access-list 1 deny 10.10.10.32 0.0.0.15
access-list 1 deny host 10.10.10.49
access-list 1 permit any
""Blair, Philip S"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED
Yep - IP helper address on the sub interface works fine in this situation.
It's secondary addresses which cause problems (in fact don't work as far as
I know).
Gaz
""GEORGE"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> If I have s
as dialled numbers such as 7201 as long as there is also a
dial-peer like this on the remote site:
dial-peer voice 2 pots
destination-pattern 7...
port 2/1
I'm just trying to confirm whether the first dial peer would intercept the
longer string and throw the other two digits away.
Thanks,
Ga
I agree - Pumpkin.
Every one of our engineers use it now and never heard of a problem.
Also supports multiple simultaneous TFTP - not sure if this is a feature of
others or not. don't suppose it's that much of a selling point, but the
reliability is.
Gaz
""Charles D
back with something like 'no number to dial' even
when used with prefix 70, because there is nothing except the
destination-pattern.
Basically the destination-pattern needs to be the full number.
Hope I've explained myself well enough.
Please excuse the VoIP newbie.
Gaz
""S
Sorry - just scrolled down to the rest of your post.
Are you sure "no service config" is in your config.
Never seen that happen once it's there.
Paste your config.
""Gaz"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> "no s
"no service config" is what you're after. Can't remember if that's
hyphenated or not.
Gaz
""Phil Lorenz"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> %Error opening tftp://255.255.255.255/msb3100_v1_silver_c
"Subsequently, software releases will be available for the Cisco 7000/7010
through Software Release 11.2 mainline. However, this will be the last
release supported on the platform."
from:
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/cc/pd/rt/7000/prodlit/615_pp.htm
Gaz
""Kazan, Naim
way for a long time.
Make sure you have not misunderstood your teachers though before you shove
it down their necks.
Gaz
""Morgan Hansen"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> WOW! Im getting this form everyone now it seams;
>
> E
You don't seem to have any flash in there. Open the box and re-seat the
flash chip if there's one there.
""Marian Iordanescu"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hi group,
>
> I have the folowing problem. have Found You the solution for this
> problem yet?
>
> C2950
Must admit I've not seen it without the (interface) option. Does the "nat 1
0 0" format equate to:
nat (inside) 1 0 0
and
nat (DMZ) 1 0 0
or just the inside interface?
Not got a Pix to try it on until tomorrow, or at least if I do I'll probably
lose the Pix I'm
Hi Nick,
You sure it was SRT? SRP makes more sense when linked with DPT.
URL below may help if that's the case:
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios120/120newft/120
limit/120s/srpapsgs.htm#xtocid1
watch the wrap
Gaz
""Nick Lesewski""
may have been using Global and Nat statements. In which case
you need a global statement on the DMZ interface to match up with the NAT on
the inside interface.
Regards,
Gaz
""Karagozian Sarkis"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
>
ommand you will be letting
replies in from outside and from the DMZ.
An access list doing the same thing would need to be applied to both the DMZ
and the outside interface. For this reason, the conduit is nice for testing,
because it's one command instead of 3 minimum.
Gaz
""Kara
Surely not.
Is ISDN used so infrequently in the states now??
It's still used widely in the UK at least. Can't believe they'd get rid of
it yet.
If there is truth in this rumour, I'd be amazed.
Gaz
""Terry Hines"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]&quo
to get the devices to do this automatically by using isakmp
keepalive 120 (crypto isakmp keepalive 120 for routers).
This means there is some extra overheads as the SA's are cleared every 2
minutes, but at least the VPN re-establishes itself.
Gaz
""Gaz"" wrote in mes
d the real explanation (if it's different) I'd be interested to
hear.
Cheers,
Gaz
""Pierre-Alex Guanel"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Ok, here are the result of my tests (cummulative)
>
> 1) I gave the loopbacks
Yeah - it was only a minor observation really.
I take it you used the ROMMON method, as if you had just used copy tftp
flash it wouldn't have asked if you wanted to enter a new activation key.
The ROMMON method just means more down time if that's important to you.
Gaz
wrote in mess
you change your dialer map statements to:
dialer map ip 172.16.1.2 name isdn2 broadcast 5554000 (on isdn1)
and
dialer map ip 172.16.1.1 name isdn1 broadcast 5551234 (on isdn2)
Gaz
""Pierre-Alex Guanel"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED
et, so anyone please correct me if
it's not available, but I'd be 99% certain it will be. Used it on 506's and
515's
Gaz
""Brad Ellis"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Yes, you need to install the OS on there again. Y
This may sound daft, and I'm almost embarrassed to suggest it, but will you
humour me and remove the "ip host isdn2 2065 1.1.1.1" command from
Router-isdn1.
Distant memories are haunting me.
I haven't got an ISDN simulator to play with at home, but I'm stumped too.
G
taining as well.
Gaz
""Lidiya White"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> By the way, PDM 2.0.1 is deferred now. Wait for 2.0.2...
>
> -- Lidiya White
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PR
We put it straight on our production Pix's along with the new PDM (VIPs,
groups etc).
We decided that if we didn't have any faith why should any of our customers,
and we really wanted to play with the Groups anyway.
No problems so far. Must be a month or so now.
Gaz
""Clayt
You're just messin' with our minds Kris.
You posted your 4 Cisco items to it yesterday.
How did you do it anyway? I couldn't see how to do it either.
In fact I didn't know it existed until you brought it to light.
Was it just a clever publicity stunt? :-)
Gaz
&qu
Hi John
Resolved Caveats in Release 12.1(11b)E4
a.. VLANs in the 1002 to 1005 range are disabled by default in Catalyst
software. In the Cisco IOS images for the Catalyst 6000 family switches and
Cisco 7600 series Internet Routers, the VLANs are in the forwarding state by
default. This default
Anybody actually seen this happen though?
I'll be a bit gutted if my primary pix fails, and while I am getting the
Primary replaced, the active secondary reboots every 24 hours, or even once
for that matter.
Gaz
""Lidiya White"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTE
deny ip any any
We may have a few other addresses caught up in there though. Were there any
other requirements like permitting anything else?
Sorry - Pedantic as ever:-)
No - can't do it in one line.
Gaz
""Mahmood"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTE
Do the password recovery sequence up to copying the start up config to
running, then have a look at the config related to the console port.
Post it here if necessary.
Gaz
""Mohannad Khuffash"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> De
27;t another 40 posts to this thread that I haven't got to yet.
Regards,
Gaz
""Karagozian Sarkis"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I am preparing for MCNS - Manual Ver 2.1 Page 6-22and not clear about
Static
> and Con
r Pix may have been there for a while?
If you want to ping out, just use "conduit permit icmp any any echo-reply"
Use some logging to work out what's getting dropped:
logging on
logging console 4 (or 5)
Regards,
Gaz
""Parmjit"" wrote in message
[EMAIL
92.168.7.0)
If it's still allowed...Are non contiguous wild card masks still allowed?
Dunno.. I seem to remember hearing they weren't any more.
Gaz
""Adams Josh"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> If you are trying to limit a
.
Anybody's welcome to chip in if I missed something, or even totally screwed
it up. World Cup fever has hit and still recovering. (Any French list
members - ho ho - sorry!)
What do you call a Frenchman in the 2nd round of the world cup?
Referee!
Gaz
""GEORGE"" wrote in messag
s for ISDN usage.
Gaz
""Shane Stockman"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I have a Cisco 1720 router with 2 x BRI modules and a cisco switch
connected
> with a couple of PC's.These dial into a Cisco 3640 router.I want to setup
>
don't want to teach you to suck eggs, but just checking as you gave us
Show Conf. You know that Show Conf gives you the start up config and not the
running config (in case there is any difference).
Gaz
""Kenny Smith"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:
I suppose if one was consistently faster than the other you would have this
situation.
Was one of them steam powered, or did it have significantly different
network connectivity.
I suppose if one were even minutely faster than the other then it would be
used exclusively.
Gaz
""Chuck&q
ll as
doing all this banter.
No offence meant to anyone in particular - I'm British, so excel in
upsetting every bugger at the same time..
Gaz
You're right. We could sit around here all day talking, passing resolutions,
making clever speeches. It's not going to shift one Cisco
but
I'd be interested to hear ideas for that too).
Any ideas?
Thanks,
Gaz
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=45031&t=45031
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
pings, but won't clog the log.
I wouldn't have thought it's ideal to have the firewall as default gateway
anyway. Can the firewall redirect inside if necessary?
Totally guessing to be honest, anybody else know for sure.
Gaz
""Wilson, Christian"" wrote in mes
Steven,
Quick - someone else is using your computer :-)
Have you really got a cable that connects two ISDN ports together. If it's
cheaper than my ISDN simulator I'll order two.
Have I misunderstood the question, or did you?
Gaz
""Steven A. Ridder"" wro
Is this the one you're after?
http://www.3com.com/other/pdfs/infra/corpinfo/en_US/501302.pdf
""Robert Kulagowski"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I remember downloading the tutorial a few years ago. Looks like it's gone
> now - google shows it on the 3com web
e in any way to let the two separate clients also
access each other's networks?
We had a few off the cuff ideas, but nothing that would seem to be a go'er.
Things like running overlapping NAT on an internal router with two
interfaces.
Anybody got any mad ideas, or possibly any sane ones?
wrong when the
plug was taken out, but he always plugged it back in just in case. It was
either that or his radio.
Doh!
Gaz
While
""Chuck"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> my favorite story was the company whose network went down ev
I don't think it was misinformation Brian.
Not sure whether it's all IOS's, but all the ones I have on my routers take
both commands although the clockrate method is a hidden one.
Not important in the least, just thought I'd mention it.
Gaz
""Brian Umbar
What's the reason?
I'm not disputing the fact, just wondering what the limitation is. I take it
that the limitation is only that it cannot do stateful failover with two
active PIXes?
Cheers,
Gaz
wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Yeah, I ask
Hi Sam,
I take it that you have a CCO log on. Go to the URL below:
http://www.cisco.com/cgi-bin/Software/SWSearch/SWSearch.cgi
and do a software search for files containing Pix.
You should get everything you need.
Regards,
Gaz
""Sam Wong"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PRO
se the support works!
You can knock Cisco all you like, but we keep coming back to them.
Anybody got any views on this?
Gaz
""David Harrison"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> This is correct. The domain name is not necessary. Since
Aren't we???
Your point?
(Devils advocate is more fun)
""cisco"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Isn't China a nuclear power?
>
> PA
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Michael L. Williams
> Sent: Mon 4/29/2002 6:59 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc:
> Subject
decent answer. I'll console myself with that.
I've now read the RFC.
John Nemeth, you're a cruel man, and I totally deserved it ;-)
Joe Bloggs
(Definitely not Gaz anyway)
""Jeremy"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I t
mportant part will be the destination port which is
'echo-reply'.
Hope I haven't confused. Hope even more that I haven't errored.
Gaz
""Anthony Pace"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> for instance :
>
> access
ense.
Can you tell me any more about yourself ;-)
Gaz
""Paul Jin"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Was this for Secret or TS?
>
> thanks,
> Paul
>
> EMW_Tech wrote:
> >
> > I shouldn't respond to a OT th
y
(minimum speed connection in particular) and relative speeds of transfer to
remote SCSI devices, and if used, the Fibre Channel switches in use.
Thanks,
Gaz
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=42472&t=42472
--
ummary address.
It doesn't take any special brain, because I'd be out of the running, it's
just hard to explain and grasp initally.
Please let me know if I should give up now and go to bed. Until then, the
fridge (or cooler if you like) beckons.
Cheers,
Gaz
""Kage Roc&
can see a new Milk tax being introduced at the next
budget.
Gaz
""supernet"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> A friend of mine bought a 2-bedroom apartment in New York, cost him
> $500,000. And he has to share bathroom with his nei
Type quicker!
Sounds daft, but you've got to fit it in the 30 seconds. Just cut and paste
a script if you've got fidget fingers like me.
Gaz
""Magichut"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Thank you,
> I can get to
How about the Cisco Content Networking Products (Content Manager I think
does this), and it'll save you wondering what to spend your money on. You
might not have any after you've bought it.
For larger scale job though it might answer the problem.
Gaz
""sam sneed"&
ast Cisco's point of view is that if the Ford bits aren't the problem,
they'll still support the kit.
Gaz
""Ismail Al-Shelh"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Its so Obvious that Cisco is trying to be like Microsoft by
One minute prior to this post you sent one with your signature block on.
Cisco Certified Academy Instructor asking for free IOS.
Come on!
""Romeo"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I have a PIX Firewall with IOS 4.1.4 and 2 Token Ring NIC's. I tried to
> chang
flowcontrol hardware
Gaz
""Hunt Lee"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I need some help for a Access Server setup.
>
> I am trying to setup a modem (netcomm 56.6k) to connect to a 2511. The
> modem is currently connected t
loyer
that there has been an intent to progress towards CCIE rather than stopping
at existing quals.
I can see your point, and I think it should be listed clearly stating that
it is just the written.
My 2 penneth anyway.
Gaz
""nrf"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]"&
sco gradually recovers, so will the CCIEprobably.
Gaz
""Kris Keen"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Your the 1st person I've heard say the CCIE isnt worth much anymore..
Message
CCIE (qual)?
Is this a new CCIE track? CCIE Quality Control perhaps?
Gaz
Professor of Urinary Extraction (qual)
wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hi Rik,
>
> You can include a access-list on your router to permit esp,ahp and UDP
> port
Have a play with these if you like:
snmpset -v1 192.168.80.254 password .1.3.6.1.4.1.9.9.96.1.1.1.1.14.11
integer 6
rem Initialise a new copy operation
snmpset -v1 192.168.80.254 password .1.3.6.1.4.1.9.9.96.1.1.1.1.14.11
integer 5
rem Set the ccCopySource FileType to "4" (running-conf
ple.
Otherwise:
www.rackears.com at $35
I'm sure you'll get a few other suggestions from the group.
Cheers,
Gaz
""Kevin Corbin"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Anyone know where I can get rack mount kits for 25
Just add another rolled cable in line if you're using 2509/2511 octal
cables.
Gaz
""Phil Lorenz"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Well isn't that a fine "how-do-ya-do ???"
>
> Console> Show Versi
ing about here? Shall we go 50/50 on that one?
We're eternally grateful, and maybe one day soon we can help you out?
You help us with quantity, we help you with quality - Ouch!
We're probably more on the same side than ever before and we still can't get
on.
Gaz
""nrf"
why would
this be turned off, what is the real risk.
A few guesses going on here, so I think I'll go and have a hunt round.
Cheers,
Gaz
""Roberts, Larry"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I had the same issue with a 501 that
Depending on the type of switch and version of software, changing mode from
Server to Client will reset the VTP configuration revision, but not on all,
so again the safest way is to confirm the revision before connecting the
switch.
Regards,
Gaz
""Arjen Dragt"" wro
p://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/lan/c2900xl/gbic/ig_gbic/mam
> oins.htm#xtocid357911
> Watch for URL wrap.
>
> Our Switchstacks contain 9 3548's here, and the uplink ports with fiber
GBIC
> modules default to full duplex, while the gigastack module ports d
ly big projects, but they do
seem to offer more functionality than the Foundry in some areas (not
forgetting the massive price difference), so I'm interested to hear what
problems have arisen with them.
Thanks,
Gaz
""sam sneed"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">
these with one cable
Configure both switches for etherchannel
Result - Etherchannel works fine - all ports forwarding
Regards,
Gaz
(Tom Petzold's e-mail follows)
Let me see if I can walk through the options.
If you hook two switches up with one cable (using only one port on each
gigastack GB
3508 can definitely
take multiple full duplex connections when used as the hub of a star
configuration.
In fact now I've finished writing it, it seems reasonable. I will test this
tomorrow as well.
Anybody pick holes in that theory?
Gaz
""Ole Drews Jensen"" wrote in
1 - 100 of 269 matches
Mail list logo
