Sure
You will need to be running IOS 12.2(8)T or above.
bk wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello all,
I am trying to terminate a vpn tunnel on a 3640 for clients (4.x). I
have done it on a pix with split-tunnel. Can the 3640 be setup to
perform split-tunnel?
**Please support
Chuck Whose Road is Ever Shorter wrote in
message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
nrf wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The simple answer is that yes, ISIS is a possible topic for the R/S
exam.
The better question to ask is why? The R/S is supposed to be an
enterprise-networking oriented
Deepali S wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi ,
I would suggest you to use PIX 6.2 software rather than 6.3.1 , since
this
has a lot of BUGs , you can download the latest PIX software version 6.3.2
Do not even think of trying to run 6.3.2. Go ahead, try to get 6.3.2 from
cco right
The simple answer is that yes, ISIS is a possible topic for the R/S exam.
The better question to ask is why? The R/S is supposed to be an
enterprise-networking oriented exam. Those who are interested in carrier
routing where ISIS is most commonly found should be looking at the C/S.
Let's face
Ken Diliberto wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
With the Sup IV, you could use the 4507R chassis and have the ability to
use redundant supervisors in the future. I think the switching speed of
the Sup IV is faster and you can do L3 as well. Things the Sup II can't
do.
Uh, I think
Man,
I never see a job post specify that certain CCIE number is prefer.
I have, many times. For example, just check out the archives at
groupstudy.jobs.
Why did you even bother to ask this question in the beginning, if you think
the value of CCIE title has drop.
Huh? I didn't ask
supernet wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
I have 3 questions regarding CCIE voice:
1. I took beta written test today and was told that I can expect a
result in 6-8 weeks. Does it really take that long? How do they contact
me? I only provided my SSN and name before the test.
and cons of MPLS and where I think it fits - but that's another
boring story for later :) www.ccie4u.comOn 1 Apr 2003 at
15:47, nrf wrote:Cisco Nuts wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Hello group, How
does one feel about a career in MPLS...I mean doing MPLSas part of
your
Mic shoeps wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thank you all folks.
I don't know much about Linux. But I would like to use the analogy that
Cisco engineers are like traffic officers in major intersections in a city
and Linux (Lexus), Microsoft (Mercedes), Solaris (Saab), Visual+ (Volvo)
Linux is very difficult to learn really well. True, CCIE lab equipment is
expensive, but I think it may take less time for some people to become a
CCIE than to get the kind of facility with Linux that the Linux-guru jobs
require.
I think a far bigger problem with choosing Linux as a
Cisco Nuts wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello group, How does one feel about a career in MPLS...I mean doing MPLS
as part of your core job day in and out.Is it worth it? Since our
network does not use MPLS (maybe never will) inspite of being one of the
Big Four Tier 1 SP's
answered.
Is nrf saying not to advance in this field by studying Cisco's way of
emphasising MPLS ?
What I said is that if you want to advance in that field, you will need
substantially more than what Cisco wants you to know about it. Read my post
again.
You know, we all have our doubts, he's
a lot while achieving
those CCXX
goals.
Anyway, I'm sure there will be a good response coming, so let me be done
with this subject. I had an early start today and I'm tired now.
Good night !
nrf wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Henry D. wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED
accordingly. This is similar to the BCMSN course material which
also has problems with dated material. I mean, why emphasize MLS so much
when all of Cisco's modern L3 switching gear uses CEF?
Priscilla
nrf wrote:
Henry D. wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I don't mean to start
Uh, I don't wanna be rude, but it is not really the purpose of this NG to
give you free consulting advice. If you have a specific technical question
that you can't solve after proper research, then by all means come here and
ask it. But if you just want somebody to do your job for you, hire one
Fundas wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
I am CCIE in RS. Thinking of appearing for another track. I know
several of you have CCIE in multiple tracks
Can you suggest me which one of Security Vs Communications and Services
is better w.r.t
1. Equipment needed for preparation.
The Long and Winding Road wrote in
message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Elijah Savage wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cisco buys Linksys.
http://www.quicken.com/investments/news/story/?story=NewsStory/BW/20030320/a
5141_1048177983.varp=CSCO
Note that Cisco will continue with the
Ben W wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The problem with doing standby track tunnel is quite often, the tunnel
interface doesn't go down. I had the same question awhile back when I was
configuring HSRP and i found out that the tunnel interfaces would stay up,
up, even though traffic
Ben W wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The PIX is not a router, however it does have a routing table and can
participate in a limited fashion in certain routing protocols, like RIP.
I'm afraid I have to disagree. The Pix is a router. Basically, any device
that will forward packets
and
well-known, what is there? Not much. The CISSP and all the SANS stuff is
not hands-on. And, as I'm sure we would all agree, paper exams are usually
not worth the paper they're printed on.
Original Message -
From: Will Gragido
To: 'nrf' ;
Sent: Saturday, March 15, 2003 7:31 PM
Subject
a chance of ever matching.
3) When will the CCIE become just another useless cert in the long history
of useless networking certs?
I think Cisco should just make a brand new cert that sits on top of the
CCIE.
NRF - you out there tonight?
Something on your mind?
--
TANSTAAFL
will be the first quadruple CCIE?
2) Does Cisco still recognize the Design, WAN, and IBM CCIE's as valid
certifications, making it possible to have more than four?
3) When will the CCIE become just another useless cert in the long
history
of useless networking certs?
NRF - you out there tonight
Ah, so I see somebody is familiar with Hugh Gallagher's infamous essay.
http://urbanlegends.miningco.com/library/blbyol3.htm
- Original Message -
From: Juan Blanco
To:
Sent: Friday, March 14, 2003 6:34 AM
Subject: CCIE [7:65426]
Team,
I got this from a friend but I not sure
Vance Krier wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Actually, there's quite a few vendors already doing this. One that I
found
to be quite impressive was vonage.com. They've got it figured out. I'm
actually testing out their service for long distance service at my office.
They give you an
yeah, different assumptions mean different results. A couple three years
ago
I was working at Well Known Clothing manufacturer in San Francisco. The
folks there were working hard to get VoIP toll bypass going between HQ and
their manufacturing plants in the far east. The number I heard was
The Long and Winding Road wrote in
message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
supernet wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
A friend of mine wants to establish a business that use internet to make
phone calls. He wants to set up PSTN gateways in some countries and sell
IP phones to high speed
John Neiberger wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm at the early stages of considering migrating away from a
point-to-point frame relay network to a layer 3 MPLS-based private
network and I have a couple of questions based on some preliminary
verbal information.
I was told that no
enhancements
are
being used to reduce latency with call setup and floor control during a
session that ironicly are not SIP based i.e. using the RTP stream for
control functions and some fancy buffering to improve the user experience.
- Original Message -
From: nrf
To:
Sent: Wednesday, March
The Long and Winding Road wrote in
message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
DAve Diaz wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
how are you supposed to prepare for this buty all that equipment no
thanks
there would be a distinct advantage to substantial hands on experience.
maybe this marks the
into a commodity every day. DFW is probably really bad
because of the crushed telcos, and I can imagine that Virginia ain't too hot
either - after all, NorVir is ISP Central, and ISP's have been slashing jobs
left and right.
-Mark
-Original Message-
From: nrf [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent
both have sections
on SIP or goto to
Cisco's website and search for SIP.
David
nrf wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
supernet wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can anyone kindly enough tell me why SIP is better than CCM? What's
the
main difference between this two
Richard Burdette wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Has anyone else noticed the increase in Cisco advertising over the last
week
or so? I'm seeing a TV add almost everyday. Could this be the result of
Cisco possibly having some statistics leading them to believe an increase
in
IT
?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
nrf
Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 10:03 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: IP Telephony SIP [7:64433]
supernet wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can anyone kindly enough tell me why SIP is better
supernet wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can anyone kindly enough tell me why SIP is better than CCM? What's the
main difference between this two? Is there any SIP in production?
Thanks. Yoshi
You shouldn't compare SIP and CCM. SIP is an industry standard, whereas CCM
is a Cisco
ride the same fiber and if it's cut
and you don have another connection it won't matter if your
voice/data/internet you'll be down.
And yes Verison did an amazing job of keeping what they had together
while they rebuilt the rest...
-Geoff
-Geoff
nrf wrote:
Actually that is not what I
power and a satellite connection.
-Geoff
nrf wrote:
Buggy/unreliable software is indeed the same anywhere. But when
combined
with buggy/unreliable OS's, now we're talking about a solution that is
REALLY buggy and unreliable. For example, if your software is only
guaranteed to run at 3 9
Sean Kim wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Hello all,
My company is thinking about installing an IDS (dedicated appliance type)
for our network.
As far as I know, the Real Secure and the Cisco IDS are two biggest names
out there.
Actually, the biggest name of
The Long and Winding Road wrote in
message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Debbie Westall wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Just a thought, but how about when
redistributing the routes to the other protocol using a route-map at the
end and
Cisco Nuts wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Ooops!! It should be my pant ;-
I did not mean anyone to violate the dreaded NDA.
My question should have read: is DVMRP a part of the CCIE topics for the
Lab?
The reason is that I see a lot of DVMRP material in
David C Prall wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
I think I can answer this one without violating NDA. MOSPF is not
covered in the lab because Cisco has chosen not to support MOSPF in
IOS. Surely you would agree that it is not easy to test something in
the lab
From what I've seen, you can still get very high rates.
The problem is that in order to get those kind of rates, you either have to
be very well connected, have a big name (far beyond what a CCIE could ever
give you - for example, Dr. Vint Cerf could easily command a princely rate,
but of course
Larry Letterman wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
I dont believe so either, since they only support a 10BT
ethernet connection...
It is correct that the 2500 does not support trunking (at least, not yet).
But I don't know that the fact that they only support 10bt
I certainly hope so. If you're only allowed one ABR per area, then when
that ABR fails, that area is totally cut off. It would mean that every ABR
in your network would be a single point of failure, and would basically mean
that nobody would ever use OSPF.
Peri Sophos wrote in message
[EMAIL
Cisco Nuts wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Very well said!!
As I ALWAYS tell my students:
You can go to any school (including Harvard) and you can be assured that
you WILL pass the exams with a A, B, C or a D grade if you study the
material.
The CCIE Lab -
Thomas wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
I have heard these stories for years now. They always start with ... I
knew
a guy who knew a guy that was a CCIE and he didn't know this or he didn't
know that. We all know what knowledge, skills, dedication, focus,
The Long and Winding Road wrote in
message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Howard C. Berkowitz wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
snip
BTW, I do consider this a fundamentally silly discussion, but I think
it's somewhat relevant for newbies to know
Let me add one more thing.
What Larry failed to mention is that if you packed together all the
non-grads in the world, you would find that most of them turn out to be
losers too. In fact, I would strongly suspect that the percentage of
'losers' in that group of people will be significantly
Yet very strangely that while Larry Ellison dismisses the value of college,
the entire executive ranks at Oracle (except himself) are all graduates.
Larry could have hired whoever he wanted, so why isn't every manager at
Oracle a dropout? So apparently even he doesn't think the degree is
Kaminski, Shawn G wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Dr. Jimmy, :-)
If I could get someone to pay for my Ph.D., I would go for it! pH would
definitely have more clout than CCNP/CCDP! Whether or not it would be easy
to find a position that requires a Ph.D. in
Geoff Zinderdine wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
For the record, I studied and practiced hard, and passed the CCIE lab
with
precious little industry experience. I found a great job in a great
company within two months of passing the CCIE Lab, and I had a few
Geoff Zinderdine wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Uh, sounds curiously like a case of sour grapes. Guys who are at the
top
of
the business world make more money in a week than we make in a year.
More
to the point, in my experience, it's always better to be the
Geoff Zinderdine wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
But on the other hand, even you agree that there are a lot of people
(not
just Americans, but a lot of people in the world) who want money. For
some
of these people, it is precisely money that brings them
I think an agenda is emerging here, nrf. This thread seemed, at least
to me, to deal with the merits of academia, certification, or
combinations to move into technical jobs.
I completely disagree with the insinuation that I have solely been moving
the discussion in any direction. If anything
Howard C. Berkowitz wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
At 11:12 PM + 1/4/03, nrf wrote:
So if it's doing public good that concerns you, then the more successful
you
are, the more you have to give. Let's face it - it's not going to be
easy
t
Howard C. Berkowitz wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
I think an agenda is emerging here, nrf. This thread seemed, at least
to me, to deal with the merits of academia, certification, or
combinations to move into technical jobs.
I completely
erything and therefore don't need to continue
learning.
A couple of personal observations: I have no interest in getting into
top corporate management, but I have and will be in senior technology
management. nrf, it seems, distinguishes simply between management
and non-management. In Cisco's case,
facility with a
given subject matter that I fear I may never experience again (unless I go
for a second CCIE). It is not rocket science, but you have to execute
VERY
well.
As for nrf, - his contributions to groupstudy have been almost entirely
negative. While it is helpful to have some di
Marc Thach Xuan Ky wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Thomas Larus wrote:
snip
As for nrf, - his contributions to groupstudy have been almost entirely
negative. While it is helpful to have some discussion of things like the
job
market and the
l0stbyte wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Ladrach, Daniel E. wrote:
I have an MIS degree from The Ohio State University Max Fisher College
of
Business. I see some posts out there saying that a CS degree is no
more than
a vocational degree. Obviously this
Geoff Zinderdine wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
I understand everything you said, and I agree that college coursework
should
modernize, but I think you may be missing the point of a college
education.
The point of a college education is not to prepare you
Jim Newton wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
I have taken all of the classes listed below while in the engineering
school
at University of Wisconsin.
I know that there was not one of them that demanded the attention to
detail
and total commitment that was required
*sigh* one of the classic complaints of interns is how they were told
don't worry about the details--learn the concepts. Now, facing a
cardiac arrest, how many milliliters of what concept do they need to
inject?
Yet at the same time we have the opposite phenomena - guys who can configure
Uh, this does not follow. How many CCIE's really really understand, say,
BGP or OSPF? No, not just how to configure it, but how it really
actually
works. Give you an example - I would be hard pressed to find a lot of
CCIE's who can explain to me how Dijkstra really works. Some can, but I
Yet I doubt that John Chambers ever read an RFC before in his life. But
let's face it. Let's be totally and completely honest. I know this
might
come across as a low-blow, but at the end of the day, who really has more
influence on the direction of the networking industry - the best CCIE in
Ok, I've been following this thread for a while now. I'm a student
currently working on my BS in Computer Engineering and I'll only be on my
soap box for a few minutes here. Colleges used to be on the bleeding edge
of technology and now they aren't anymore. I'm a network security
engineer
Andrew Dorsett wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
On Wed, 1 Jan 2003, nrf wrote:
updated. But I look askance at demands that colleges transform
themselves
into glorified vocational schools. If all they're doing is teaching
the
technology
Carroll Kong wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
You are correct. For most people, I think acquiring a PhD is more
resources and time consumed than becoming a CCIE. Now, not to
belittle the CCIE, it is still probably one of the hardest lab
examinations in the IT
bergenpeak wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Interesting question. Some thoughts from someone that does have a PhD
in CS (dissertation in networking, a dozen or so publications, a handful
in IEEE journals). I initially went into gradual school to teach and do
Pcasey wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Interesting question, but I think the question of which is tougher and
which is more valuable get confused.
As someone who has an MBA from a top school, I know that it took several
thousand of hours of work and an estimated
The thing about comparing degrees to certs is that they aren't totally
comparable because they serve different purposes. The degree is designed to
teach you general knowledge - basically to teach you how to think.
Let's face it. The vast majority of college graduate use very little of
what they
Steve Dispensa wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
I've been arguing with a collegue of mine which one would be tougher to
achieve. I told him that it would be much more harder to have a computer
science or a networking degree (you have to take the GRE and complete
wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
That is a very interesting question for me; Yestarday I went for a lunch
with a friend that got his MS on Economy, and I asked him:
- What do you think it would be better? Either use my time and energy to
get certificate or go
Jarett
nrf wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Marc Thach Xuan Ky wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
A few points:
When I was fresh in the IT industry (over 20 years ago) the old-timers
who had been working
Definitely. Janitors now use vacuum-cleaners as well as brooms.
Telephone operators now use keyboards, not patchcords. Networkers will
need to know more than just layers 2 and 3. But there will be a
continued demand for R/S as part of the networkers job.
I think you just said the key word
Aaron Ajello wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
IMHO, comparing COBOL and mainframes to networking as a valuable,
marketable
skill set doesn't follow. COBOL was replaced by VB, C++, ASP and other
languages. Mainframes were replaced by things like Windows, UNIX and
Marc Thach Xuan Ky wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
A few points:
When I was fresh in the IT industry (over 20 years ago) the old-timers
who had been working maybe four years already would tell me that there
was no future in programming, after all they said, who
CL: OTOH, there are plenty of guys driving around in their trucks doing
just
that. I don't know the typical annual income for Joe the plumber or Bill
the
electrician ( and just so the PC people don't get on my case, I have yet
to
meet Mary or Jill in those lines of business ) but I believe
Howard C. Berkowitz wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Perhaps your most important point is at the end, but I'd like to
amplify on it. The idea of a converged public Internet is probably
not achievable. I prefer to call service providers that move packets
IP Service
The Long and Winding Road wrote in
message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
right up NRF's alley. Certainly for those considering their futures,
something worth considering as part of the mix.
http://cookreport.com/11.10.shtml
Can't afford the un-snipped version right now, but
Henry D. wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Since we're just throwing out our thoughts here...
I tend to disagree, following your logic, if the IP network
becomes such a commodity, I think this would just create more
jobs for people like us, I mean R/S guys.
dre wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
nrf wrote in message ...
The biggest problem with broadband? Simple. There is no mass-market
app that actually requires broadband. Most people are perfectly
happy with dial. After all, what do they do on the
Nah, not yet. Soon.
supernet wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Several months ago, Cisco TAC told me that CallManager 3.3 would be
released in Nov. this year. Is it out yet? I don't see it in Cisco
download area. Thanks.
Message Posted at:
While I disagree with the harshness of Adrian's posting, I have to say that
I do agree with the crux of his argument. No - not the part about firing
people before Christmas.
The part I have to say that I absolutely agree with him about is that people
who just know R/S and only R/S really do need
dre wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
nrf wrote in message..
What ATM did was simple. It gave customers a circuit that was
almost good as leased while still providing for multiplexing, and
the cost-savings associated with that, to the provider.
wexo la wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
I have no doubt this is not the cetification!
I am just saying it is not testing you on your experties or knowledge!
You are correct to say that the CCIE written exam, at least in the past, had
some serious problems. I,
dre wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote
I may be starting a new project doing some writing about
technologies used in enterprise networks. (read not service
provider)
Do I need to cover IS-IS? Or is it mainly ISPs that use this?
dre wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
nrf wrote in message..
ISIS has more tuning parameters and more extensibility than OSPF.
It also has significantly more scalability than OSPF. I dislike
EIGRP precisely because it's inner-workings are closed.
bill cisco-guy wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Would be nice to know but I doubt you will get a answer since you
then know what they can and can't test on.
Only one for sure is token ring.
They said no token ring after nov 4 so why would they have a interface
Oliver Hensel wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Hi.
I'd simply use secured switchports fixed to one MAC address
and a DHCP server which gives out IP addresses based on MAC
address. You could also use static ARP entries (this would
need to be done to all the
adrian jones wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
All,
I am happy to report that my luck has changed for the better.
Yesterday (Saturday), I had an interview with a manager of a tech
consulting
company which I find kinda strange; however, I was told that the
I would argue that while the CCIE lab itself does not require a job that
consists of 100% networking (heck, some guys have passed the lab without
ever touching a production network before in their life), the main reason
for most people to try the lab - which is to get a high-level networking
job -
That makes me question myself whether if it is worth it to pursue
the CCIE RS and CCIE Security given the market condition. These
guys have years of experiences and certified and are without jobs.
I would have virtually no chance with people like them even if I am
CCIE certified.
Router_10(config)#router ?
bgp Border Gateway Protocol (BGP)
egp Exterior Gateway Protocol (EGP)
eigrp Enhanced Interior Gateway Routing Protocol (EIGRP)
igrp Interior Gateway Routing Protocol (IGRP)
isis ISO IS-IS
iso-igrp IGRP for OSI networks
Curious wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
PIX supports GRE, i have setup GRE tunnel between my 2 sites. Here is
link
which might helps you.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk648/tk367/technologies_configuration_examp
le09186a00800a43f6.shtml
I don't know that
Not to mention that msn mesgr can conceal itself using port80 packets.
Josh Green wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
It is possible, however Messenger uses so many different ports on so many
different servers that it's not worth your time.
-Original
Ryan Finnesey wrote in message
news:200211050237.CAA19680;groupstudy.com...
What would be a good way to manage the IX remotely ?
Get yourself a terminal server and set up out-of-band management to that
terminal server.
Ryan,
Greg Owens wrote:
It is for future use.
-Original
Michael Vasilenko wrote in message
news:200210292058.UAA00599;groupstudy.com...
Hello!
One question - is it possible to run MPLS (edge or LSR) on 26xx?
Any experience? Right IOS?
Sure, it's just flaky. And not surprisingly MPLS is not officially
supported by Cisco on 26xx's, so if you are
Why, the biggest one of all - Worldcom.
bergenpeak wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Lets make this discussion real. What major ISPs actually use 1918
addresses
on their physical interfaces?
I know ATT (7018) does not.
nrf wrote:
Symon Thurlo
ets make this discussion real. What major ISPs actually use 1918
addresses
on their physical interfaces?
I know ATT (7018) does not.
nrf wrote:
Symon Thurlow wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Well, I would view an ISP who uses 1918 addresses in thei
Symon Thurlow wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Well, I would view an ISP who uses 1918 addresses in their public network
a
little warily. Traceroute etc are pretty fundamental problem solving tools
IMHO
Well then I suppose that means you would be suspicious of
1 - 100 of 499 matches
Mail list logo
