To add to Chuck's comment: If you're familiar with Cisco, your sanity is
also the difference. The way Nortel configures their routers is
dramatically different and can leave you very frustrated if you're not used
to them. Do they still use Site Mangler...er, I mean Manager? In all
honesty, it's
t; another interface, as Dave said.
>
> >>> MADMAN 8/5/03 1:25:25 PM >>>
> I think your thinking way too hard about this;) A loobback is
> nothing more than a logical interface as opposed to a physical
> interface. As far as the routing process is concerned i
We had this exact same problem on our network. Turned out to be a corrupt
WINS database. However, since I am not in charge of the servers, and the
guy who was still (1 year later) has not repaired the WINS database, the
solution for me was to add a line in the lmhosts file pointing to the domain
Rusty, was there a URL here that was truncated? If so, I would very much
like to see it. n_guide_chapter09186a0080087da4.html#3302
""Wilmes, Rusty"" wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> n_guide_chapter09186a0080087da4.html#3302
>
> -Original Message-
&
would appreciate it as I
> really need to get this fixed. Thanks.
>
>
> ""Robert Edmonds"" wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > With regards to these two lines:
> >
> > > static (inside,outside) tcp interface ftp 192.168.0.1 ftp net
You gentlemen have pointed out some good uses for loopback interfaces.
However, my dilema still remains that I have yet to have somebody solidly
explain loopback interfaces in a way that my simple mind can understand. I
have also been unsuccessful in finding any website that accomplish this.
Any t
With regards to these two lines:
> static (inside,outside) tcp interface ftp 192.168.0.1 ftp netmask
> 255.255.255.255 0 0
> static (inside,outside) tcp interface www 192.168.0.1 www netmask
> 255.255.255.255 0 0
I believe they should read:
static (inside, outside) tcp interface OUTSIDE ftp 192.
John,
That's not so bad. I have been aware of that fact for quite some time, but
still continue to forget to issue a clear xlate about half the time. So
which is worse, ignorance or stupidity?
Robert
""John Neiberger"" wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> I thought I'd share an embarrassi
I have the old file with the 3508 series if you need it. Just let me know
where to e-mail it.
Robert
""Elijah Savage"" wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Does anyone have visio stencils for Cisco 3500 series switches like the
> 3508's and 3548's, I use to have them but had to reinstall a
Is that output from a 3550? I know the command is the same on most Cisco
gear, but my 3550 doesn't show whether it's SX or LX. It shows everything
else, though.
Robert
""Scott Chau"" wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Hi Tim,
>
> DNWB-008-AS01#show interface gi0/1
> GigabitEthernet0/1 i
My question to Tom and Raj is, where can I get it? I am not a programmer
(yet, working on that), so scripts like these that are free are always a
welcome site. If you guys are willing to share what you have (your
livelihood doesn't depend on it) let me know.
Robert
""Tom Martin"" wrote in mess
My first Network Administrator job came to me when the current Network
Administrator was fired for lying about his certs, and I was the most
experienced (relative term) person there. At the time, I was way over my
head, but it all worked out fine since there are always resources to tap,
people to
To the first part of your question, yes, that is it basically. If you are
using the Cisco VPN client, you will enter the group name and password under
the "Authentication" tab. You can also use the VPN client that is built
into Windows, in which case you do not need the group name and password, b
I had almost the exact same problem with a T1 line. In order to convince
the telco, I replaced the WIC cards at both ends and then called them and
told them I didn't care what it took, but they better fix the line. They
then came out and performed an on-site test again, and lo and behold, there
w
I'm not sure I understand the question correctly, but I do know that it is
never a good idea to duplicate IP addresses on your network. This can only
lead to trouble. My advice would be, don't do it.
""Nuurul Basar"" wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> I am planning to configured both my
I can't help too much with the banks, but I used to run the network for
hospital and supported several doctor's offices that used our network. The
main thing you need to worry about there is that you meet the requirements
outlined in the HIPAA (Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act
o
P.
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Robert Edmonds [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Monday, March 24, 2003 9:51 AM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Redistribution question [7:66071]
> >
> >
> > I have a network with approximately 20 V
I have a network with approximately 20 VLANs, running EIGRP as my routing
protocol. One of my VLANs, VLAN12, runs RIP for connectivity to another
organization. The others do not need to receive RIP updates. So, the
solution I came up with is to make the other 19 VLANs passive interfaces so
that
Try the following Cisco link on IGRP metrics:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk826/tk365/technologies_tech_note09186a0080
09405c.shtml
""Tim Champion"" wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> When calculating the metric of an IGRP route (with non-default 'K' values)
> which load and reliabil
Actually, Multiprotocol Label Switch is MPLS. MLS is MultiLayer Switching.
This refers to a switch that can do not noly what Kiran said about L3
switching, but can make forwarding decisions based on higher level
protocols, such as tcp, udp, etc.
""Kirankumar Patel"" wrote in message
news:[EMAIL
First, you need to define your inside and outside interfaces for NAT.
Usually, the interface where your webserver is connected will be defined as
inside and all others are outside. This would look something like this,
assuming your web server is on interface ethernet 0:
interface ethernet 0
ip a
Start at your core and work your way out. For example, if you have a core
switch connected to other switches at the distribution or accesss layers via
trunks, do a show mac-address-table (or show cam dynamic for CatOS switches)
and see which trunk port it is coming from. Then go to the next switc
I know this is the Cisco forum, but I know many of you folks use Linux on
your networks, so I am asking for your recommendations.
I have a Cisco network with a PIX firewall in place. I would like, if
possible, to put a Linux server on the network to act as a proxy
server/internet monitoring compu
Well, I would like to take this opportunity to thank Paul then. I have
learned a lot just reading the interesting posts here. In fact, I keep a
document of any particularly good tips for future reference. I would also
like to thank a couple of the most active folks here, like Larry and
Priscilla
I believe the command you are looking for is "ip default-gateway .
Since the 2950 is an IOS based switch, the set commands don't apply here.
""J. Johnson"" wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> All,
>
> Is there a way to set a default router for a 2950 switch? Apparently
other
> 2900 switch
I checked the Network Address Translation Catalyst Switch Support Matrix on
Cisco's website and confirmed that the 3550 does not support NAT.
""Michael Williams"" wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> I don't believe the 3550 supports NAT. There was a recent discussion
about
> this on the IE
If show ip eigrp doesn't give
you what you're looking for, I think you're going to have to break down and
use debug. If I'm wrong, I'm sure someone will correct me.
""Michael Williams"" wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> I know this question sounds silly, but I can't for the life of
I'm not sure what the actual cause or fix is, but I had the same problem. I
ended up uninstalling the AT&T client to get it to work.
""supernet"" wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> I have AT&T VPN client on my laptop. It stopped working after I
> installed Cisco VPN client. Is there any c
I replied earlier, but it didn't seem to come through. Anyway, you should
use the wildcard mask 0.0.4.255. That will match the addresses
192.17.73.0 - 192.172.77.255, which I think is what you want. In case you
don't already have it, download Boson's free wildcard mask calculator at the
followin
Couldn't you just use the wildcard mask 0.0.4.255 to deny 192.17.73.0 -
192.17.77.0? I used the Boson wildcard mask calculator to check this, and
it gave me those networks.
""Andrew Larkins"" wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> the first access-list will not work.
> The second one will als
Layer 3 switching combines the best of switching and routing in one
platform. The main advantage here is speed. The way it works is, in a
switch you have some kind of layer 3 routing engine (aka route processor, or
RP). For example, the MSFC2 (Multilayer Switch Feature Card 2) is one of
the opti
The reason that the 2950's do not support ISL trunking is that Cisco is
gradually moving towards supporting the major standards more and proprietary
standards less. As part of this plan they are beginning to make switches
that only support dot1q trunking. At least that's what a TAC engineer told
Just set the 3550 as a VTP client in your current domain and it will just be
a layer 2 device. Or order it with the SMI software load rather than the
EMI.
wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hello All:
>
> Question - By default, out of the box, will a L3 switch simply
By default a trunk port will carry all VLANs, which it will need to do in
the setup you have illustrated. If you prune the other VLANs at the second
switch, the users in VLANs 3 and 4 on the third switch will be cut off.
""Happy World"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED].
Don't quote me, but I do believe the access list is necessary as it actually
tells the router which traffic to encrypt. PERMIT =ENCRYPT and DENY=DON'T
ENCRYPT.
I think the following Cisco link may help answer your question best.
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios121/121
Check the following link and see if it has the answer to your question:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/secursw/ps2120/products_configuration
_guide_chapter09186a008008d313.html
""Richard Campbell"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hi.. Group,
>
> May I kn
I'm fairly certain the answer to your first question is no, the switch will
not be intelligent enough to switch it to the appropriate port
automatically. The reason is that the switch must go through a layer 3
device to get from one VLAN (aka IP subnet) to another. I don't think this
is a real is
This one's for you Dwayne:
I've never done it before but I know you can NAT based on source address. I
believe you would use the "ip nat inside source list "
command. Then, I guess you would apply an access-list to the destination
subnet allowing only the NATed addresses and deny all others. So
Are you wanting to also block the ICMP unreachable message? If so, you can
use "no ip unreachable".
""Stephane Litkowski"" wrote in message
news:200211052003.UAA03311@;groupstudy.com...
> Robert,
>
> I tried to apply th ACL at inbound (for ICMP traceroute version) :
> on the PC (192.168.1.2), I
I hate to ask a dumb question, but did you apply the access list to your
inside interface with "access-group 101 in interface inside"?
I just tried the same thing on my PIX and it did work. I would check your
config.
""Stephane Litkowski"" wrote in message
news:200211051821.SAA10082@;groupstudy
I was good up until #7. The only African dialect I am fluent in is the
"click" language !Ora (pronounced Kora) used by Southern African Bushmen.
Guess I'll have to hit the books again.
""Casey, Paul (6822)"" wrote in message
news:200211051809.SAA08018@;groupstudy.com...
> The new qualifications
My guess is that you're using the 640-504 study guide by Clare Gough, Cisco
Press. I am also using this book as a study guide and have been very
confused by her use of these terms. Remember that this book is a bit older
than the current criteria, so when she was actually penning it the
informatio
If I understand correctly, I believe this will accomplish it.
access-list 100 deny ip 10.5.0.0 0.0.255.255 10.1.0.0 0.0.255.255
access-list 100 permit ip any any
interface e0/1 ip access-group 100 in
This will deny traffic from 10.5.0.0 from getting to 10.1.0.0, but let all
other traffic through
The switching exam questions that refer to IOS based switches will be more
like the 2900 and 3500 series and less like the 1900 series.
""Ahed Naimi"" wrote in message
news:200210300639.GAA02527@;groupstudy.com...
> Hi All;
> I am working on CCNP switching exam and I saw that , there are differen
I had the demo version installed. It's the same as the full just with the
time stamp, right?
""Fernandez, Tim"" wrote in message
news:200210292045.UAA29160@;groupstudy.com...
> Hey all, has anyone been able to install Cisco Works 2000 on an WindowsXP
> Pro Box?
> Thanks,
>
> Timothy B. Fernande
I've heard this same thing too. However, I really don't put much weight in
it. Here's why. Let's say you answer all the questions in a way that makes
you seem like a beginner. It would make sense that you would probably get
easier questions. Why would Cisco want a CCNA, CCNP or CCIE out there
I've used Zyplex (or is it Xyplex?) in the past and had good luck with them.
Their configuration was very straightforward also.
""Frank Dagenhardt"" wrote in message
news:200210291456.OAA08533@;groupstudy.com...
> Hi All,
>
> I was wondering if anyone had any advice on a good 8 port terminal serv
Did you issue "ip subnet-zero"?
""Brian Zeitz"" wrote in message
news:200210251603.QAA05517@;groupstudy.com...
> Hello
>
>
>
> I am new to working with the 3550-24, I upgraded to the EMI layer 3.
> That worked fine, I used a TAR file and did an overwrite. What I want to
> do is make a router from
The 3550 definitely does support ISL trunking.
""Ellis, Andrew"" wrote in message
news:200210241123.LAA30175@;groupstudy.com...
> Raj,
>
> The following link will tell you enough so you can make it work, if you
have
> the right router.
>
> http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/473/50.shtml
>
> -Drew
>
Don't quote me, but I don't believe so. I would see if I could specify that
the PIX must come with the latest software revision; that is, if I didn't
buy the contract, which is a good idea because stuff happens, you know?
""sam sneed"" wrote in message
news:200210231729.RAA20504@;groupstudy.com.
David,
To add a new user, from the home menu go to SETUP (s) then SECURITY (se) and
select USER INFORMATION (i). From there you can select ADD NEW USER (add)
and fill in the appropriate information for the user.
""David j"" wrote in message
news:200210181620.QAA27129@;groupstudy.com...
> Hi all:
d to be more clear in terms
> of describing your internal network.
>
>
> ""Robert Edmonds"" wrote in message
> news:200210181908.TAA09447@;groupstudy.com...
> > I work for a county government. As part of building a new courthouse, I
> am
> > tasked with
I work for a county government. As part of building a new courthouse, I am
tasked with providing attorneys in courtrooms with Internet access through
my network. Of course, I would like to provide them access to what they
need while blocking access to our internal network.
My network is setup in
If you issue the command dir, do you see the file that you loaded via tftp?
""John Brandis"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> **
>
> visit http://www.solution6.com
>
> UK Customers - http://www.sol
Richard,
Can't be. We geeks don't do that. And if we do, we never admit it.
""Richard Botham"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Robert,
> Apologies - comes from reading too quickly :)
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=55565&t=55
to inside, though, you don't want to do that.
And if you are using private addresses on your inside network, you won't be
able to ping them from the Internet anyway. Good luck.
Robert Edmonds
""Naomi James"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL
Two comments I would like to make.
1. Richard, the gateway of last resort IS on the same network as E0/0. The
subnet mask is 255.255.0.0.
2. The route you added tells the router that 1.1.1.1 is out interface E0/0.
It's on E0/1. So that definitely won't work.
If you remove the NAT statements, a
I can't speak for all four, but I know I passed the switching exam using the
5xx series books. The routing exam has added IS-IS, which is not covered in
the 5xx series books, so you may want to add that to your studying. I'm not
sure about BCRAN and CIT.
""Irfan Hussain"" wrote in message
[EMA
Although I can't speak to your problem specifically, I have seen similar
issues with other software products. For example, we use SurfControl
Superscout for web monitoring/filtering. It has an icon down by the clock
you can double click on to configure certain items. This icon is not
available i
The only place I have experience with "set" commands is on CLI based
switches, such as the 4000, 5000, 6000 series. On those platforms, instead
of having global and interface configuration modes, you do everything from
privileged exec mode using set commands.
What exactly are you trying to accomp
access-list rate-limit
To configure an access list for use with committed access rate (CAR)
policies, use the access-list rate-limit global configuration command. To
remove the access list from the configuration, use the no form of this
command.
access-list rate-limit acl-index {precedence | mac-
I apologize for my outburst. I did not mean to insinuate that ONLY
Americans can be racist. In all fairness I will acknowledge that people
from any country can be equally racist, intolerant and ignorant.
""Howard C. Berkowitz"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> At
Nice racist attitude there. Nothing like good ole American bigotry posted
all over the global Internet to win world favor. Keep it up!!!
""Erwin"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Go and find it in your own country !
>
> ""Vinod Raju"" wrote in message
> [EMAIL
Ok, consider this. You have a server behind a router and you want others on
the Internet to be able to use the services on this server. The server's IP
address is 172.16.1.10. You have a block of IP address given to you by your
ISP. The addresses are 192.1.1.1 - 192.1.1.14 (this implies a subn
The information afterwards is not my words. I got it off of
www.examnotes.net. It was written by a guy that frequents their forums who
works in the telecom industry, doing work related to WAN type installations,
including DSL. Here's what he said about the subject:
ADSL. Asymmetric Digital Sub
>From Cisco's website:
You can use the fixup command to change the default port assignments or to
enable or disable application inspection for the following protocols and
applications:
a.. FTP
b.. H.323
c.. HTTP
d.. ILS
e.. RSH
f.. RTSP
g.. SIP
h.. SKINNY (SCCP)
Personally, I can't imagine being able to pass the CCIE R&S exam and not
being able to breeze through the CCNP stuff. It may be different than
version 1, but I imagine you've probably been keeping fairly up to date with
this stuff since you're attempting your IE cert.
""ccnp ccnp2002"" wrote in
Well, as it turns out, what I'm trying to accomplish can only be done using
TACACS. So, I will have to use privilege levels within the switch to
restrict access.
""Robert Edmonds"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I am trying
For $500, that sounds like a bargain. I've never seen two day class offered
for that little.
""Neal Rauhauser"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Would you guys attend a two day, hands on basics class for Cisco
> routers?
>
>
> I own an internet provider and star
I am trying to configure the MSFC2 on my 6506 to use RADIUS authentication
from my Windows 2000 Server. What I would like is to have the MSFC
authenticate users using the RADIUS server on login. I would also like a
backup account locally in case RADIUS authentication is not available. If
it is
I get the exact same thing on my 6506's. However, everything I've found on
Cisco's website leads me to believe this isn't an issue. They haven't
specifically said that, but the MLS troubleshooting doesn't even mention it
(at least not that I've found). Let me know if you find out anything.
Rob
In a large organization, I would recommend OSPF anyway. It's generally
considered to be more scalable the EIGRP.
""nrf"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> ""Chuck's Long Road"" wrote in message
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > hey, friends, I'm a
Check out the following link for a free subnet mask and wildcard mask
calculator from boson. I use it myself.
http://www.boson.com/promo/utilities.htm
""Brett spunt"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Great, detailed explanation !
>
> Thanks!
>
> Brett Michael Sp
y on paper. And,
in my opinion, it's more important to be able to "walk the walk" than "talk
the talk". What do you think?
""Kevin Cullimore"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> inline
> - Original
onfig that allows you to send
> jobs to a printer. I just looked it up and you need to understand the LPD
> Unix command to understand printer on a router.
>
>
> ""Robert Edmonds"" wrote in message
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> >
Copy it to a text file, then print it. There is no way to print it directly
from the router.
""Hamed Sedighi"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hi,
> How can I print my router configuration?
>
> Thanks,
> Hamed Sedighi
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.
I don't think it's accurate to say that Cisco, Microsoft and Novell have
contributed to the "paper cert syndrome". They simply created
certifications in an effort to distinguish those who are familiar with their
products from those who don't. The people who use brain-dumps and boot
camps are the
I'm currently studying for routing. It looks to me as if OSPF is going to
give me the most trouble (I use EIGRP at work, also have used RIP, versions
1 and 2). How bad was it? Give it to me straight, Doc!
""Symon Thurlow"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Passed
I don't have the config you want, but how about a link for configuration
help?
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/iaabu/pix/pix_62/config/over
vw.htm
""NetEng"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I was trying to get FTP to work through my PIX and total
The configuration you posted will result in a network that looks like the
information below.
SubnetMask Subnet Size Host Range
Broadcast
191.72.0.0 255.255.224.0 8190 191.72.0.1 to
191.72.31.254 191.72.31.255
""JohnZ"" wrote i
I make up numbers based on the amount of calls that I can attribute to WAN
problems, place them in a presentation with lots of acronyms and long
technical words and e-mail them to my boss. Then, if the boss has any
questions about the technical jargon, I look up the answer on the Bastard
Operator
You don't always want to put the deny at the end. For example, if you want
to deny just one subnet, but permit everything else, putting the permit any
statement at the beginning would allow the subnet you intended to deny. I
know, a lot of permitting and denying going on in that sentence. :)-
"
a
router for redistribution into the routing protocol in question; in this
case EIGRP. Sound right? Thanks.
""Robert Edmonds"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I noticed today that between several of my routers, routes that were
&g
Ryan,
If I understand your question, then I think I may be able to help.
I believe what it means when it talks about caching flows, is that it caches
the information about the flow -- particularly the path the flow will take.
This makes it so the layer 2 portion of the switch doesn't have to send
I noticed today that between several of my routers, routes that were
statically assigned did not get sent in the routing updates to neighboring
routers running EIGRP. So, I removed the static routes on several of them
to one subnet in particular, and when the router closest to the subnet in
quest
...
> Periodic server reboots are generally to deal with memory leaks rather
> than moving parts. Flawed router software could perhaps exhibit the same
> fault, although I have never heard of it personally.
>
> Symon
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Robert Edmonds [mailt
I couldn't have said it better myself (especially the non-inclusive part -
that's my word for the day for the rest of this week - non-inclusive)
""Russell Heilling"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> ""Cisco Nuts"" wrote in message
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL
Priscilla,
After rereading the question, I see my mistake. I guess I just read right
over the part where he said there was no route from B to A.
Those pesky details will get you every time.
""Priscilla Oppenheimer"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> evans Anthony w
I haven't come across anything personally either way, but it seems that this
would be unnecessary for a router, since there are no hard drives, etc. I
know it can be an issue with servers that stay on all the time, but I think
routers, switches, etc. with no moving parts (except of course, the fa
Anthony,
If I understand you correctly, it shouldn't be a problem. All you're doing
is mixing dynamic with static routing. It's done every day, all over the
world. By the way, how do you like your Extreme equipment. Where I used to
work did a migration to Extreme (or rather has been doing a mi
According to the following Cisco link:
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/473/33.html#networknumber
As with other network addresses, Novell IPX network addresses must be
unique. These addresses are represented in hexadecimal format and consist of
two parts: a network number and a node number. The
I'm not 100% sure, but I think if you want to connect to the ethernet port
you will need a crossover cable. Why not connect to the console port to do
the initial config anyway?
""Naomi James"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I have a PIX 525 and I am doing the i
I read about an almost identical (if not actually identical) issue on
Cisco's website. The solution they gave was to do NAT on one side of the
WAN link.
""McHugh Randy"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I have an OC3 ATM WAN link that connect two LANs, but there
I sent a message to Cisco asking if it was possible to verify certification
status, and this is the response I received:
Dear Robert:
Thank you for contacting Cisco Training and Career Certifications team.
We can verify certification for candidates given the proper information.
Please provide t
I believe the upgrade from SMI to EMI is pretty standard. Check the
following link for more ino:
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/lan/c3550/1219ea1/ol208901.h
tm#xtocid10
""Firesox"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Is it just a software upgrade t
I have a 515 without a floppy drive. Do I need to go into monitor? Or can
I just tftp the file and reload?
""Robert Edmonds"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> To upgrade the PIX to a newer software version, do you just do
> copy
I don't see any version newer than 6.22 on their download page. Am I
missing something?
""Robert Edmonds"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> To upgrade the PIX to a newer software version, do you just do
> copy tftp 172.16.6
To upgrade the PIX to a newer software version, do you just do
copy tftp 172.16.6.100/pix622.bin flash
and then reload?
Sounds like I'm missing something.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=53747&t=53747
--
FAQ, list
At my last organization, we had someone who lied about their Microsoft
certification. We just called the number that you would call to check your
own status, told them what we suspected, and they verified it. Try that.
""Kaminski, Shawn G"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROT
I'm not sure if 504 covered it, (it's not covered in the 2 books I've read
preparing, but the BSCI test includes IS-IS. Make sure you're up on it.
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/732/Tech/routing/isis.shtml
""Kaminski, Shawn G"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
>
1 - 100 of 107 matches
Mail list logo
