Hello
I have a
line aux 0
transport input all
that works ok for my terminal server;
the only thing you should be careful about is to check for the async line
number assigned to the AUX line ( use #sh line)
Good luck
---
Gabriel Neagoe, GN379-RIPE
Net
PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject: RE: Terminal server
Hello
I have a
line aux 0
transport input all
that works ok for my terminal server;
the only thing you should be careful about is to check for the async line
number assigned to the AUX line ( use #sh line)
-Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 16, 2000 11:44 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: groupstudy
> Subject: RE: Terminal server
>
>
>
> Thank you but when I do a reverse telnet...
>
> Af
Hi!
Do not forget that aux port has different signalling pins than async ports!
> Can someone tell me whether it's possible to use the aux port connected to
the
> console port of another cisco router? I tried the same conf as if I was
using
> the asyn port but it failed. (transport input all, no
/0
[EMAIL PROTECTED] on 08/16/2000 06:28:59 PM
To: Claude-Vincent PEREZ/JP-TOKYO-HOLDING/LVMH@LVMH, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Terminal server
what do "#show line" result ?
---
Gabriel Neagoe, GN379-RIPE
Try using a terminal server. We use the chase io terminal servers
(www.chaser.com).
Joe
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> Sam Adams
> Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2000 2:30 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Terminal Server
>
>
> I am g
Annex
Sam Adams wrote:
> I am getting a little tired of switching the roll cable between routers.
> What's good and reasonably price solution to this problem?
>
> Opinions welcomed.
>
> Thanks.
>
> ___
> UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/g
Watch the wrap
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/793/access_dial/comm_server.html
"James Haynes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
93o01i$cjm$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:93o01i$cjm$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I have been following the links that have been posted on this site for
CCIE
> Lab study. One
Thx for the site it answers exactly what I was looking for.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ("_") wrote:
>Watch the wrap
>
>http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/793/access_dial/comm_server.html
>
>
>"James Haynes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>93o01i$cjm$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:93o01i$cjm$[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"I have configured the lines with no passwords or timout"
If you didn't do anything then by default, exec will time out after 10
minutes.
So if you got all 8 lines up its pretty easy to think that a few might be
standing there unused for 10 minutes while you're playing with the
others.
So y
Under line 1 8, issuing a 'no exec' command should also do the trick.
ak
Brian Lodwick wrote:
>
> Group
> I have been fighting with the performance of my terminal server for a few
> weeks now. It works, and I have been using it, but like I said I have been
> fighting with it. It seems to send c
I just installed a 2611 with a 16 port async NM for our lab.
I have a 2509 in my personal lab and it works flawlessly.
However the 2611 seems to get more "noise" and it would seize a few lines
and I would have to clear them and disconnect them before I could attach
again.
Looking at Lab 1 in th
mand.
>>>Brian
>From: "Jim Dixon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: "'Brian Lodwick'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: RE: Terminal Server for beginners
>Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2001 13:21:19 -0600
>
>If you
on to the "transport input all" command.
Along with Kevin's advice and this additional command sessions shown are
accurate and don't timeout. It's working great. Thanks Kevin and Bruce.
>>>Brian
>From: "Kevin Wigle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To:
We use this in our lab.
You have a few choices depending on how many lines you want.
NM-16A: Sixteen-port Asynchronous Network Module
The 16-port asynchronous serial network module supports 16 asynchronous
serial interfaces at speeds up to 134 kbps. The 16 ports are cabled with two
custom "octop
-port NM4A/S, or the 8-port NM8A/S
bit cheaper than an $2,000 (list) NM-16?
Andy
- Original Message -
From: "Kevin Wigle"
To:
Sent: Friday, May 11, 2001 12:44 AM
Subject: Re: Terminal Server [7:3939]
> We use this in our lab.
>
> You have a few choices depending on
silly me.. didn't read to the end of the question.
I wouldn't buy a NM-16A for two ports either.
Kevin Wigle
- Original Message -
From: "Andy Harding"
To:
Sent: Thursday, 10 May, 2001 20:33
Subject: Re: Terminal Server [7:3939]
> if you really only hav
ginal Message -
From: "LandCai"
To: "Andy Harding"
Sent: Saturday, May 12, 2001 3:51 AM
Subject: Re: Terminal Server [7:3939]
> Hi, Dear Andy,
>
> Could you let me know if this CAB-SS-232-MT is terminated into RJ45
connector? Because serveral my router and swit
Mark,
When you get the blank line, then press enter and end up back at the west
router, do you have a "Resuming connection to xxx..." line before west's
router prompt? If not, I dont think the escape sequence is being
acknowledged. When you input the command, do ctrl-shift-6, then release all
3
hello,
try
line 0 16 transport output all (telent)
if you are using WIN2k Hilgraeve you will have to hit twice
Good Luck
P
- Original Message -
From: "Mark Rose"
To:
Sent: Saturday, May 19, 2001 8:45 PM
Subject: Terminal Server [7:5149]
> I have a 2511 set up as a terminal server Acc
D]
Subject: Re: Terminal Server [7:5149]
Mark,
When you get the blank line, then press enter and end up back at the west
router, do you have a "Resuming connection to xxx..." line before west's
router prompt? If not, I dont think the escape sequence is being
acknowledged. When y
--Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> Brad McConnell
> Sent: Saturday, May 19, 2001 8:02 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Terminal Server [7:5149]
>
>
> Mark,
>
> When you get the blank line, then press ente
>
> Mark
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> Brad McConnell
> Sent: Saturday, May 19, 2001 8:02 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Terminal Server [7:5149]
>
>
> Mark,
>
> When you get the
router,
> > how do you terminate a session while leaving the others (or just the
> > original telnet to the access router running).
> >
> > As always the help is appreciated by all people who help with advice.
> >
> > Mark
> >
> > -Original Mes
e 2' to close that
session.
Little trick I learned for getting around quickly in the CCIE lab.
Tony M.
#6172
- Original Message -
From: Mark Rose
To:
Sent: Saturday, May 19, 2001 9:07 PM
Subject: RE: Terminal Server [7:5149]
> The sequence of hitting ctrl-shift-6 then releas
HOW MANY VTY LINES DO YOU HAVE??
;-)
>>> "Ravi Varma" 6/15/01 3:12:12 PM >>>
Hi Guys ,
I had configured a terminal server for one routers i wanted to know
how many
users can access the same router at same time
Thanking you inadvance
Regards,
Ravi Varma
Messa
Telnetted into the terminal server - 5 (vty 0 4)
reverse-telnetted from the terminal server into the attached router console,
only one at a time.
telnetted into router using vty virtual terminal lines - 5 with
non-Enterprise IOS, many more with Enterprise IOS versions
- Original Message --
Only one person at a time. Unless you hook one line to the console, and a
second to the aux port.
Paul
- Original Message -
From: "Ravi Varma"
To:
Sent: Friday, June 15, 2001 5:12 PM
Subject: Terminal Server [7:8780]
> Hi Guys ,
>
> I had configured a ter
Mark,
Issue the command: clear line . This
will fix the problem.
Han.
--- Mark Rose wrote:
> I am trying to get a terminal server working. It was
> working several months
> ago but when I tried to bring it up today, I get
> the message " %3 is not an
> open connection". I do not have enough e
I've used Zyplex (or is it Xyplex?) in the past and had good luck with them.
Their configuration was very straightforward also.
""Frank Dagenhardt"" wrote in message
news:200210291456.OAA08533@;groupstudy.com...
> Hi All,
>
> I was wondering if anyone had any advice on a good 8 port terminal serv
I use a digi. It works good. Got it off ebay for about #100 or so, 16 ports.
Symon
-Original Message-
From: Robert Edmonds [mailto:rwedmonds@;montgomerycountytn.org]
Sent: 29 October 2002 15:55
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Terminal Server [7:56454]
I've used Zyplex (or
Go buy a cheap 2511 from ebay or from someones ccie lab..
that will give you 16 ports
Larry Letterman
Frank Dagenhardt wrote:
>Hi All,
>
>I was wondering if anyone had any advice on a good 8 port terminal server. I
>would prefer to get cisco but the cost is a little much. Does anyone have
>e
Is this a newer 1924 or the older one with the DB9 plug?
Also, post the config you are using for this port.
MikeS
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33447&t=33439
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://
What kind of cable are you using?
I have the same thing here with a cat5505 and I have to put a rollover cable
on the end of the the 2509 line
2509 --switch
^ ^
async line rollover
-Joe-
wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">n
ginal Message-
> From: ferg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, January 28, 2002 10:47 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Terminal Server setup [7:33439]
>
>
> What kind of cable are you using?
>
> I have the same thing here with a cat5505 and I have to put
Please forgive my ignorance but the regular cisco blue cables are rolled
and that is what I am using. Am I missing something here?
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33488&t=33439
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscript
You might be able to find in the archives a discussion about this. I put the
pin-outs down at the time. Probably 10-12 months ago. Some of the 1924's
(early ones with DB9) had a specific cable.
There is a funny loop in there somewhere. Have a search, if you can't find
it I'll see if I can dig a ca
To do reverse telnet to some Cat switches (with the RJ45 port), you need to
"hardwire" pins 1 and 8 on the Cisco rollover cable. I had the same problem
with a 2924XL and this solved the problem.
To do this, just "nick" the side of the rollover cable on pin 1 and pin 8 --
just enough to expose the
I and my team tried Xyplex & Digiboard as alternatives for some very
expensive pieces of kit from Compaq & Cisco in the mobil;e telecoms arena
for IVR, TAPI or other voice to data applications. After a lot of painful
experiences with both our conclusion was to order a skip for the kit. Its
all abo
Forgot to add that support for Xyplex & Digiboards is absolutely rubbish. 4
to 5 days even witha support contract for kit replacement, no software
support at all you get the picture. Oh and just in case you were wandering I
do not have any allegiance to network kit manufacturers.
Ouellette, Tim w
line 1 16
no exec
transport input all
This is sufficient, I have had similar problems at one stage but not to that
extent
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=55721&t=55715
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info
Thanks Mike,
Here is my config on the 2511:
ip host r8 2008 1.1.1.1
ip host r2 2002 1.1.1.1
ip host r1 2001 1.1.1.1
ip host r3 2003 1.1.1.1
ip host r4 2004 1.1.1.1
ip host r5 2005 1.1.1.1
--More--
ip host r6 2006 1.1.1.1
ip host r7 2007 1.1.1.1
ip host fr 2008 1.1.1.1
ip host r9 2009 1.1.1.1
i
Is this a case where you escape from one router back to the terminal server?
If so, the line is still active - if you do a 'show session' you will see
which hosts are active. If you escape back to the terminal server and want
to return to an active session, just type the number of the session fro
a couple of things - you set the privilege level very low. most commands
have a default level of 7 or so IIRC.
you could do login local, and associate privilege level with the local
login. set that level at 1 or 2. set the enable level at 10.
or you could change the privilege level of only those
Okay here is what i have now Chuck:
I did
2621(config)#priv exec level 8 show line
2621(config)#priv exec level 8 clear line
2621(config)#priv exec level 8 show session
2621(config)#priv exec level 8 show host
And assigned a password to level 8
Then telneted in, used the telnet password, did "
Okay, figured it out.
Imagine this:
If you have
vty 0 4
transput output none
that reverse telnet doesn't work =)
Thanks for the help anyways Chuck!
Dan
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=48687&t=48678
--
FAQ, lis
Dan- put together a cheapo linux box and put a TACACS server on it. Now you
can go nuts with who gets what. Use webmin for a GUI interface to manage the
Linux box and you are set.
Or you can do what I do alot. I bought a copy of Virtual PC for Windows off
ebay for under 70 bucks. Install it on a
You need "transport output telnet"--this is the default, but you've
overrridden it with the "none" parameter.
Enjoy!
--
Richard Deal
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Author of the following Coriolis books: CCNP Switching Exam Cram, CCNP
Remote Access Exam Prep,
You are missing a few things. Here is the basic term server setup:
ip host r1 2001 1.1.1.1
ip host r2 2002 1.1.1.1
ip host r3 2003 1.1.1.1
^ This number must match the "absolute number" of
the tty line you want to use. Do a "show line" to find out what this is
line 1
Jeongwoo,
Maybe looking in wrong location. Make sure that the console ports on the
other routers aren't hung or mis-configured. I've had 'questionable'
response doing this from time to time and it's normally the remote route.
--Alan
CCNA, CCDA, CCIE Written
Jeongwoo Park wrote:
>
> Hi all
>
Hannes,
you would configure it like this
Router(config)#aaa authentication local-override
In this case, the router will first check to see if there is a local
user specified before checking the tacacs server. If one doesn't exist
locally then it would check the tacacs server. Hope that helps
Hannes,
In your config you have the line:
aaa authentication login default tacacs+ enable
What this means is "for users logging into this device (or devices supported
via this device - ie. your terminals) use the following methods (default):
tacacs+ if it is configured correctly, the router can
I know that the Sup III cards for the 5500 series use a straight Ethernet
patch cord rather than the standard rolled console cable. I don't know about
the 6509. Try going from the AUX port of your router to the switch with
first a rolled cable - if that fails then try a straight.
> -Original
Just to get all the assumptions out on the table:
- The 6509 Supervisor console port takes a standard black or blue Cisco
rollover cable
to connect to your terminal or terminal emulator. You connect the
"CAB-OCTAL-ASYNC="
cable from your 2620 directly to the console port and it should work,
provi
No one has mentioned it yet but make sure that the little pin beside the
6509 console port is in the "in" position. This position allows the rollover
cable to work. This position will also allow the 2620 cable to connect
directly to the 6509. If this doesn't work it is likely a config issue on
the
Got it..
CTRL-SHIFT-6-6-x
Notice the double 6? thats the magic I needed to know. Gotta love Google
once you get the right search words. In this case, the word *nested* is what
brought me to the answer. And it was not found on Cisco's site..
Thanks
MikeS
Message Posted at:
http://www.groups
Google rocks!
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41598&t=41496
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
What are you using to do the load balancing? The Windows machines? Or
something in the Cisco, like Server Load Balancing?
Mike W.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=44111&t=44002
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscript
Yes, We are using CSS to load balance between five Microsoft Terminal
Servers.
Best regards,
""Michael Williams"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> What are you using to do the load balancing? The Windows machines? Or
> something in the Cisco, like Server Load
What are you balancing on? Have you configured the CSS to balance on
least connections because the default is round robin. These are your
load balancing options, Round Robin(default),Weighted Round Robin,Least
Connections/Bytes, and
ArrowPoint Content Aware (ACA).
If you want to balance based
As I said before load balancing is okey, the problem is with statistics. For
example when you especialy look to the statistics with sh service summary
and sh summary you see 4 persons on server 5 when you looked from server 5
there are 7 persons. This is the problem I am trying to tell. Although t
Manishkumar,
clear line 1-16 will reset your connection
-Frank
On 3 Nov 2000, Manishkumar Patel wrote:
> Dear All,
> Hi!
> I have setup 2511 as Terminal Server, with the Octal RJ-45 cables connected to
> Console port of 4 2500 Routers. During a day the reverse Telnet works fine,
> but when I tr
You're not logging out of the first connection, therefore, the terminal line
is in use when you try to log in again. Use the command "sh user" to show
current line connections. You will see a user on the async line, use the
command "clear line " to reset the connection.
Erik Mintz
Domestic Field
You probably still have a session connected to that router. To check that, use "show
session" command. It lists all active sessions. If you see a session connected to the
router you want to telenet to, just type the number, for example 2, then return. It
will take you to that particular router
Try this:
line 1-8
absolute-timeout 480
transport input telnet
transport output telnet
telnet transparent
stopbits 1
Enjoy
--
Richard Deal
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Author of the following Coriolis books: CCNP Switching Exam Cram, CCNP
Remote Acc
Hi Jeongwoo,
I am a newbie to the group.
Did you try 'transport input all' for line con 0?
- susan
Jeongwoo Park wrote:
> Hi all
> How can I get my 2509 terminal server to work?
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=5144&t=5119
-
Thanks for your input.
I did "transport input all" under line 1 8.
jp
""Susan McClendon"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hi Jeongwoo,
> I am a newbie to the group.
> Did you try 'transport input all' for line con 0?
> - susan
>
> Jeongwoo Park wrote:
>
> > Hi all
We're running two threads on the same subject. You should have been reading
the other thread. Anyway - do a clear line 1, clear line 2. That will free
up your lines. The "*" in front of a line means that the router thinks that
it is in use. Then from your prompt enter "r1" it should then say somet
Get a 2511, they are fantastic. As far as I know, just about every lab
scenario ive done has had Reverse Telnet setup as one of the first things
you do..
They are perfect for CCNP/CCIE study
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=42631&t=42600
-
4/27/2002 3:20am Saturday
I finished the CCNP over a year ago & did not need reverse telnet.
If you have the $$$ it will not hurt to have it.
Richard
//
""Kris Keen"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Get a 2511, they are fantastic. As far as I know, just abou
we have a couple hundred of those same 3524xl boxes running on
console servers in cisco and have no problems...no special setup either.
Larry Letterman
Cisco Systems
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: "Ed Moss"
To:
Sent: Sunday, April 28, 2002 4:50 PM
Subject: Terminal Server
Hello,
I used to swap the console cable too and was wondering about the same
thing, and then I have bought a CS-516 with the "latest" IOS, which is
the cheap equivalent of the 2511. If you devide the how many times you
plug in and out the console cable till you become a CCIE, you will get
som
Are you hitting ctrl+shift+6 , letting off and then hitting x ? I believe
that you have to hit the keys like this for it to work and you can't just
hit ctrl+shift+6+x all at one time.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=59914&t=59884
-
>Okay, figured it out.
>
>Imagine this:
>
>If you have
>vty 0 4
> transput output none
>
>that reverse telnet doesn't work =)
>
>Thanks for the help anyways Chuck!
>
>Dan
>
As an exercise for Chuck, we leave the question, why isn't reverse
telnet the tenlet protocol?
Message Posted at:
http
>Okay, figured it out.
>
>Imagine this:
>
>If you have
>vty 0 4
> transput output none
>
>that reverse telnet doesn't work =)
>
>Thanks for the help anyways Chuck!
>
>Dan
>
As an exercise for Chuck, we leave the question, why isn't reverse
telnet the tenlet protocol?
Message Posted at:
http
Put linux on an old 386/486, connect the console port of the 2500 to a
serial port of the linux box. ssh to the linux box, start up a minicom
session with the 2500 and from their you have access to all of your equipment.
Use iptables on the box to restrict access to it.
(by the way, as long as
Although this would be considered "high maintenance", you could
think about a FreeBSD box with a Cyclades serial card. (you can get enough
to handle A LOT more than 16 serial ports if you need it) You could get
the BSD box in a 1U format. It supports ssh and telnet. The problem here
is you
It's not THAT high maintenance... I mean...how often have yo urebooted any
linux/bsd box? : )
But cyclades are not cheap! : (
>>> "Carroll Kong" 11/21/01 01:28PM >>>
Although this would be considered "high maintenance", you could
think about a FreeBSD box with a Cyclades serial card. (you c
Why not just build a linux box with ssh support and telnet from there to
the term server? Another step - but probably more secure...and a lot
cheaper than another router.
Berry
At 01:04 PM 11/21/2001 -0500, you wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>I currently use a 2511 RJ Terminal Server on a site with dial u
seems to be the consensus... : )
Although if you telnet from the linux box then you are just as insecure as
you originally were...
-Patrick
>>> "Berry Mobley" 11/21/01 01:53PM >>>
Why not just build a linux box with ssh support and telnet from there to
the term server? Another step - but pr
High maintenance as in, there is a hdd, if it fails it is a pain
in the butt to get your colocation guy to pull it out. Or have fun flying
down there. It will cost money to do that, plus hdds will more likely fail
than say a flash card. You COULD run FreeBSD on a flash card, but
ultimately,
Patrick,
I had to reboot my two servers four times. That being said, they were like
turbo 486 machines with 32MB (or was it 64MB) RAM and 1GB drives. The
operating system was Red Hat version something-or-other. They were the
smallest machines I could get my hands on at the time. They ran DNS
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Terminal Server with SSH - Not cheap are they? [7:27038]
seems to be the consensus... : )
Although if you telnet from the linux box then you are just as insecure as
you originally were...
-Patrick
>>> "Berry Mobley" 11/21/01 01:53PM >>>
ROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> Patrick Ramsey
> Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 10:58 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Terminal Server with SSH - Not cheap are they? [7:27038]
>
>
> seems to be the consensus... : )
>
> Although if you telnet from the linux box t
IL PROTECTED]...
> > One could install an extra ethernet nic in the linux box and then just
use
>a
> > cross-over cable to connect directly to the 2501.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Kent
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:
ROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > > One could install an extra ethernet nic in the linux box and then just
> use
> >a
> > > cross-over cable to connect directly to the 2501.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Kent
> > >
>
hance, it will blow your mind.
- Original Message -
From: "Gaz"
To:
Sent: Thursday, November 22, 2001 10:53 AM
Subject: Re: Terminal Server with SSH - Not cheap are they? [7:27038]
> Carroll you are a star.
>
> I'm ordering one now to give it a try.
> I'l
No, not really... here's why:
you're connection to the jump-point (your linux box) is via SSH.
you're connection to the router is via telnet
configure the router to *only* accept telnet sessions from the linux box
So, in theory someone could sniff the network and get your login
authentication
TED]]On Behalf Of
> Patrick Ramsey
> Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 10:58 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Terminal Server with SSH - Not cheap are they? [7:27038]
>
>
> seems to be the consensus... : )
>
> Although if you telnet from the linux box then you
""Howard C. Berkowitz"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> >Okay, figured it out.
> >
> >Imagine this:
> >
> >If you have
> >vty 0 4
> > transput output none
> >
> >that reverse telnet doesn't work =)
> >
> >Thanks for the help anyways Chuck!
> >
> >Dan
> >
>
> As an
>""Howard C. Berkowitz"" wrote in message
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
>> >Okay, figured it out.
>> >
>> >Imagine this:
>> >
>> >If you have
>> >vty 0 4
>> > transput output none
>> >
>> >that reverse telnet doesn't work =)
>> >
>> >Thanks for the help anyways Chuck!
91 matches
Mail list logo
