On Sat, 2006-05-06 at 06:36, Kevin wrote:
How can I set the following rule to auto load when I have to reboot the
router? ie. where to input in the config files, mostly a newbie to Linux
snip
I am using Charles's Dachstein version 1.02 with PPPOE
Kevin,
Please consider using a newer LEAF
On Fri, 2004-12-17 at 07:14, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Charles, I don't mean to be dense (although sometimes I am!) Mike
Noyes posted that Dachstein had been updated to the latest kernel
(2.2.19-3 or something similar) and had a few package improvements.
When I retrieve the image his
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Charles, the new distribution is a BIN instead of an ISO ? if it were
an ISO I think I know how to attack it.
Is there also an ISO for the new distribution?
Dachstein is available in both CD-ROM (ISO) and floppy-disk format:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Charles, I don't mean to be dense (although sometimes I am!) Mike Noyes posted that
Dachstein had been updated to the latest kernel (2.2.19-3 or something similar) and had a
few package improvements. When I retrieve the image his announcement referenced, it was
on
Kenneth,
If you are pretty sure it's a CD image, you could always burn it to a
CDRW - test and see if it actually boots Dachstein, and then make an
ISO out of it. That would likely ensure an image that you can work
with.
Otherwise you could post the link to the bin file on the list and
someone
On Fri, 2004-12-17 at 08:17, Charles Steinkuehler wrote:
I think the Dachstein announcements are old posts that got relisted somehow
with all the changes to the website lately (Mike Noyes is updating the
dynamic php code that generates the web-pages, and the SourceForge folks
have been
On Fri, 2004-12-17 at 20:55, Ken Gentle wrote:
An updated Dachstein was a lot to hope for... back to collecting modules
for Bering uClib...
Ken,
Bering uClibc files are located in these locations:
https://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=13751package_id=67534
Ken Gentle wrote:
Guys, I know I've seen this on this list and in the documentation, but I
can't seem to put my hands on it.
I want to take the new Dachstein bin image and make an ISO cd out of it --
would some kind, benevolent soul please point me at the correct FM to RT?
You probably want the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
GD wrote:
| I suspect it might be a hardware problem,
| but am not quite sure. What could cause the firewall
| reboot itself?
Almost certainly a hardware problem -- the last time that it happened to
me, incredibly the faulty component was *the
Craig Johnson wrote:
The only documentation I can point you to for the
border_router option
is the shell-script source that builds the firewall rules.
So when you use the border_router option, what is the setting for
IPFILTER_SWITCH in network.conf?
I beleive it should be set to router. Look
Craig Johnson wrote:
Wondering if I can get some help?
I have a static public IP from ISP for an ADSL account (call it
addrISP). We also have our own public IP range. I want to setup an LEAF
box (eg dachstein), which holds the addrISP on one NIC, and one of our
public IP addresses on another NIC.
Thanks for the quick reply! Some more stuff below...
* what is the best way/distro to setup a LEAF box as this
kind of border
router? (I noticed references to border_router options on
the dachstain
network.conf documentation page, but haven't been able to find any
substantial
Craig Johnson wrote:
Thanks for the quick reply! Some more stuff below...
* what is the best way/distro to setup a LEAF box as this
kind of border
router? (I noticed references to border_router options on
the dachstain
network.conf documentation page, but haven't been able to find any
The only documentation I can point you to for the
border_router option
is the shell-script source that builds the firewall rules.
So when you use the border_router option, what is the setting for
IPFILTER_SWITCH in network.conf?
Hmm...I suspect the ISP will consider anything coming down
Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2004 00:23:59 -0400
From: George Metz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [leaf-user] Dachstein as border_router? (public
ip addresses
etc)
Don't know about shorewall (which you would have to configure
to allow
VPN traffic to pass through
Craig Johnson wrote:
So if NAT is turned off and I have straight-forward routing happening,
will the shorewall rules mean only what it says will get through? Or
will the shorewall just forward packets addressed to the firewall to
another server, without interfering with packets addressed to the
-Original Message-
From: Tom Eastep [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, 28 April 2004 8:40
To: Craig Johnson
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [leaf-user] Dachstein as border_router? (public
ip addresses etc)
So if NAT is turned off and I have straight-forward routing
Craig Johnson wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Tom Eastep [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, 28 April 2004 8:40
To: Craig Johnson
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [leaf-user] Dachstein as border_router? (public
ip addresses etc)
So if NAT is turned off and I have straight
Tom Eastep wrote:
If you are going to use Bering, I would start with a shorwall.lrp from
shorewall.net. Those packages have all NAT turned off by default.
The best best document for you to read is
http://shorewall.net/shorewall_setup_guide.htm.
I meant to say that the best *Shorewall*
Don't know about shorewall (which you would have to configure to allow
VPN traffic to pass through to that specific IP address), but what you
basically want it to do is substitute for a traditional router.
Effectively, you'd simply have to turn off NAT and let DNS and the
public IP addresses
TeraTerm Pro?
Putty?
Tony
- Original Message -
From: Arnold Wiegert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2004 12:28 PM
Subject: [leaf-user] dachstein vt100 emulation
Hi all
I'm still running Dachstein, but would like to use a serial line to
access
Arnold Wiegert wrote:
Hi all
I'm still running Dachstein, but would like to use a serial line to
access the 'box' from a Windows machine.
Since I haven't found a good free VT100 emulation program, I've used
and older modem program which does a pretty good job, except for the
page up and down
Thanks for the references.
I looked them up and it seems Putty is good for telnetting only. Found
TeraTerm Pro and have installed it. It works well for serial
connections, but the 'page up' key seems to cause text to be deleted;
the page down key works as it does at the machine console.
I'll
Charles Steinkuehler wrote:
Arnold Wiegert wrote:
Hi all
I'm still running Dachstein, but would like to use a serial line to
access the 'box' from a Windows machine.
Since I haven't found a good free VT100 emulation program, I've used
and older modem program which does a pretty good job,
Giovanni Franza wrote:
Arnold Wiegert ha scritto:
Thanks for the references.
I looked them up and it seems Putty is good for telnetting only. Found
TeraTerm Pro and have installed it. It works well for serial
connections, but the 'page up' key seems to cause text to be deleted;
the page down
LaRoy McCann wrote:
I have spent all weekend looking and trying to figure out how to make this
work. Now it is time to ask for help.
I have Dachstein CD running as a proxy-arp firewall for a system. Is it
possible to have the firewall redirect all port 80 requests from the DMZ
(eth2) and
At 06:52 PM 3/7/2004 +, Miguel De Avila wrote:
I have 4 addresses that I would like to bind to the public interface of my
dachstein firewall.
The addresses appear to bind ok, but I can't ping the secondary addresses,
only the primary address (216.65.38.18).
From here, I can ping all 4
If memeory serves, you may need to load the serial.o module; setserial
is not needed in for most configurations.
-Richard
On Sun, 2004-02-22 at 05:23, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have been very happy using the Dachstein-CD. I have configured 1
for broadband, and also 1 for dialup with an
This is in reference to the mrtg program file, the line references line
1485. There may be a syntax error.
another way to get what you want as a test is to perform an snmpget on your
selected target.
joey
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
--- Joey Officer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is in reference to the mrtg program file, the
line references line
1485. There may be a syntax error.
no, it's not the mrtg program. because it works just
fine if the target is other router.
another way to get what you want as a
Negative, 192.168.0/23 will route 192.168.0.0/24 and 192.168.1.0/24
but ignore 192.168.2.0/24. You'd need to do a /22 to do aggregate
routing with the specified /24s, and at that you'd have two /24s
floating in limbo.
Victor McAllister wrote:
Dachstein will not route between interfaces unless
Richard,
Two questions:
1. What is wrong with Dachstein? Is it insecure?
2. I've tried your suggestions and still I can't ping either internal
network from the other. But, I do know have a new route:
192.168.2.0/24 via 192.168.1.254 dev eth1
The other one didn't take. I don't know why.
Any
Mark Bynum wrote:
Richard,
Two questions:
1. What is wrong with Dachstein? Is it insecure?
2. I've tried your suggestions and still I can't ping either internal
network from the other. But, I do know have a new route:
192.168.2.0/24 via 192.168.1.254 dev eth1
The other one didn't take. I
Mark Bynum wrote:
All,
It shouldn't be this hard. All I'm trying to do is route between my two
internal networks of 192.168.1.0 and 192.168.2.0. Here is what I have:
INTERN_NET=192.168.1.0/24 192.168.2.0/24
eth1_ROUTES=192.168.2.0/24_via_192.168.2.254
eth2_ROUTES=192.168.1.0/24_via_192.168.1.254
On Thu, 2003-09-25 at 21:37, Mark Bynum wrote:
All,
It shouldn't be this hard. All I'm trying to do is route between my two
internal networks of 192.168.1.0 and 192.168.2.0. Here is what I have:
INTERN_NET=192.168.1.0/24 192.168.2.0/24
eth1_ROUTES=192.168.2.0/24_via_192.168.2.254
Alex McLintock wrote:
Hi folks,
I have a Dachstein firewall which I set up over a year ago - it works fine.
But I now want to make a couple of linux servers available to the outside
world through ssh.
I thought about port forwarding - but I guess that wont cut the mustard for
ssh.
SSH works
When I try to use the lrpkg.cfg file to extend the command line length,
as described in various messages on this list and other documentation,
to load more packages from the second floppy.
I thought lrpkg.cfg works only with *Bering*, not Dachstein, but I have
never used Dachstein, so I can't
William Brinkman wrote:
All,
I put the NTP rpm in my mandrake 9.0 linux box.
Set the ntp.conf server to 192.168.1.254 (firewall
address). Inserted a /etc/ntp.drift and put a 1 in
the file. Started the ntpd daemon.
Tested out the troubleshooting guide and on the
mandrake box tried a:
# ntpq -p
: Mon, 17 Mar 2003 07:00:00 -0600
From: Charles Steinkuehler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: William Brinkman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [leaf-user] dachstein NTP Internal Time Server - Up and running
William Brinkman wrote:
All,
I put the NTP rpm in my mandrake 9.0 linux box
Kevin,
Thanks for weighing in with your results.
I am up and running with a M$ freeware called
Dimension 4 on a 98se box. It uses the SNTP (Simple
NTP) and for whatever reason, works well with the
Dachstein firewall. It however, does not mention
compatability with XP so - your mileage may
Kevin wrote:
I was curious, so I tried to hit my firewall without making any changes to
its current state.
I used a program call NetLab 1.4, freeware for windows. It has a time snyc
function I use to keep my clocks updated.
When I hit the main time server that worked through the firewall -
All -
A quick update,
I inserted into network.conf, down about line 323, the
list of servers matching the list from the ntpsimpl
conf from the setup package menu.
ie:
EXTERN_UPD_PORT0=0/0 domain
EXTERN_UDP_PORT1=0/0 bootpc
EXTERN_UDP_PORT2=www.xxx.yyy.zzz/24 ntp
William Brinkman wrote:
snip
My M$ machine still cannot sync with the DS firewall
with a unable to contact server and a mandrake 9.0
box with netdate 192.168.1.254 run from root gets
connection refused.
Looks like I'm still lost as how to open the internal
port 123 for the time server.
Port 123
Thank you Charles for the excellent lead!
I took your advice and did a #netstat -ldp | more
and got the following lines concerning port 123 (with
apologies for the formatting problems):
proto recv-Q send-Q local addr foreign addr state
PID/Pgrm name
udp 0 0 192.168.1.254:123 0.0.0.0:*
William Brinkman wrote:
Thank you Charles for the excellent lead!
I took your advice and did a #netstat -ldp | more
and got the following lines concerning port 123 (with
apologies for the formatting problems):
proto recv-Q send-Q local addr foreign addr state
PID/Pgrm name
udp 0 0
Thank you Charles for the expert advice on upd.
I did a little more snooping and turns out #netdate
command (linux box) is port 37 while ntp is port 123.
(I realize I'm beginning to sound like a total moron
and should have done the homework and rtfmed).
I downloaded a program called
All,
I put the NTP rpm in my mandrake 9.0 linux box.
Set the ntp.conf server to 192.168.1.254 (firewall
address). Inserted a /etc/ntp.drift and put a 1 in
the file. Started the ntpd daemon.
Tested out the troubleshooting guide and on the
mandrake box tried a:
# ntpq -p 192.168.1.254
The
William
William Brinkman wrote the following at 00:03 16.03.2003:
Greetings All-
I really don't want to open the EXTERNAL upd ports
and let my box be the time server to the world.
No need...
.
What about your log files, do they indicate any port 123 traffic to be blocked?
Erich
THINK
Erich,
Thanks for asking! I should have looked earlier! I
examined the denied packets carefully, and yes, the
selected internet time servers were getting blocked
coming back to the firewall in a rather impressive (in
volume of traffic) manner.
I disabled the servers until I can start to let
Hi all,
I am back from vacation!
This morning I attempted to remove M$ Proxy Server from the Exchange box and
reconfigure TCP/IP settings. The Exchange box is now fully functioning
behind the Dachstein router as originally intended.
Note: the box had to be rebooted for the gateway address
But ... the ONLY change we are suggesting you make is to the Exchange
server's default gateway. Does that *really* require a reboot
on Windows?
(I know the old joke about You have moved your mouse - press
any key to
reboot, but surely Microsoft has make networking
reconfiguration a
Doug Sampson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) had this to say on 02/14/03 at 15:07:
But ... the ONLY change we are suggesting you make is to the Exchange
server's default gateway. Does that *really* require a reboot
on Windows?
(I know the old joke about You have moved your mouse - press
any
Doug Sampson wrote:
No, Dachstein isn't replacing anything that used to exist at that address. I
am still running a Proxy Server 2.0 at that address and it shows port 25 and
80 being open. Running a port scanner from outside the network against the
Dachstein router shows only port 80 (and 22) as
Ray/Charles,
I was afraid you'd both still point to the TCP/IP settings of the Exchange
box as the cause for the failure. I had thought that scanning a range of
ports was to check if it was open. But it looks like my assumption was
wrong. It checks for responses and obviously the scanner isn't
At 10:06 AM 2/11/03 -0800, Doug Sampson wrote:
Ray/Charles,
I was afraid you'd both still point to the TCP/IP settings of the Exchange
box as the cause for the failure. I had thought that scanning a range of
ports was to check if it was open. But it looks like my assumption was
wrong. It checks
Doug Sampson wrote:
I want to port forward any packets sent to port 25 on the external interface
to an internal email server but I seem to be having trouble doing so. I've
made the necessary changes to the network config file but the changes aren't
taking hold. I've rebooted the server twice to
OK, are several things that could be going wrong, besides
mis-configuration (it looks like you've got everything setup
properly,
but I can't tell for sure without the full output of net
ipfilter list).
1) Your ISP is blocking port 25. This is fairly common, and is
typically
OK. Nothing like looking at a real ruleset to sort things out. The input
chain appears to be working properly to allow port-25 traffic in, since
this rule shows matching packets:
20 800 ACCEPT tcp -- 0xFF 0x00 eth0
0.0.0.0/00.0.0.0/0 * - 25
Since you
On Monday 10 February 2003 04:32 pm, Doug Sampson wrote:
20 800 ACCEPT tcp -- 0xFF 0x00 eth0
0.0.0.0/00.0.0.0/0 * - 25
0 0 MASQ tcp -- 0xFF 0x00 *
192.168.1.4 0.0.0.0/0 25 - *
:: Port FW ::
prot localaddr
Ray,
But with all of that, I cannot connect (using telnet) to your
mail server
from here (though I can ping you and connect to the Web server).
You couldn't- all attempts to port 23 are blocked.
So ... how thoroughly have you checked the Exchange server for
configuration problems? Is
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have used both Dachstein 1.0.2 and Bering uClib 1.0.1 on a 90mhz
pentium box. Both are standard distributions. The only modifications
were to the modules section to support my two network cards. I have a
cable modem connection.
When running the Dachstien distribution
Karl Poglitsch wrote:
Just wondering, I haven't seen anything lately on any upgrades to Dachstein,
just a lot of chatter about Bering etc.
Has Dachstein been abandoned?
Not dead, really, just kind of in stasis. :)
While I have not had the free time lately to do much updating, the
existing
Roger,
On Mon, 20 Jan 2003 15:10:21 EST Roger E McClurg wrote:
I need to create a LEAF firewall using Dachstein 1.02 on a laptop with 2
PCMCIA NICs.
Do you need to use Dachstein? Bering has much better PCMCIA
support. It should be doable under Dachstein, but you will
almost certainly
?
Roger
Todd Pearsall todd
@pearsall.us
01/20/2003 03:55 PM
To: Roger E McClurg/CEG/CSC@CSC
cc:
Subject:Re: [leaf-user] Dachstein 1.02 and PCMCIA
I haven't done pcmcia with Dachstein, but I have with Bering. If you
don't
have to Dachstein, try Bering
Roger,
On Mon, 20 Jan 2003 16:26:09 EST Roger E McClurg wrote:
I'm willing to go with Bering, if someone can tell me how to get it up and
running via PCMCIA quickly. I need a firewall doing DHCP on eth0 for it's
IP address, and running DHCPD on eth1.
dhcpd is included in the stock Bering
.
Thanks to all that helped out.
- Todd
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Greg Morgan
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 12:36 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Todd Pearsall
Subject: RE: [leaf-user] Dachstein Config, HW Issue or
Comcast
Todd Pearsall wrote:
Now for the problem, for the week or 2 (approx. the same time as the HW
swap) I can't download files greater than about 2MB. It 1st appeared
because some antivirus downloads were failing and later I noticed that
any somewhat large file would just hand during download. When
On Tuesday 14 January 2003 08:40 am, Todd Pearsall wrote:
I did a HW swat for that firewall because I needed the space for 3 NICs
in the office so I swapped in a different PC. The new box has different
NICs in it (2 Linksys 100TX vs. the 2 ISA 3COM NICs in the old one) and
the new one can't
2) try an alternate driver for the Linksys NICs
3) try different NICs
Thanks again.
- Todd
-Original Message-
From: Charles Steinkuehler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 10:56 AM
To: Todd Pearsall
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [leaf-user] Dachstein
On Tue, 14 Jan 2003 14:34:15 EST Todd Pearsall wrote:
Thanks for the great advice as always Charles and Lynn.
I hadn't considered the memory or drivers as potential problems. In the
past I've had problems finding the right drivers for the Linksys chipset
du jour, but when I got one that
Todd Pearsall wrote:
Tonight I'll:
1) test the memory
Try http://www.memtest86.com/ for testing memory. There is both a
diskette and cd-rom test program. Just put it on a disk and reboot.
2) try an alternate driver for the Linksys NICs
3) try different NICs
Greg Morgan
On Wednesday 08 January 2003 05:08 pm, Chris Low wrote:
The disk that came with the NICs wanted me to compile a driver from the
source code rtl8139.c, then copy it to /lib/modules/2.2.14-5.0/pcmcia then
edit the /etc/pcmcia/config file and the linuxconf. How do I do this? or,
is there an
Charles,
This typically happens if the booting process doesn't load the etc package
(etc.lrp). There are many reasons for why this can happen, but I think
the most likely would be the system is not finding the CD-ROM drive.
You were right, it found the CD drive fine, but the drive didn't
Chris wrote:
My system doesn't allow booting from a CD so I'm booting with a floppy and
that seems to work fine, however after loading I don't get a login prompt.
Instead it asks me to Enter runlevel I've tried putting in 1, 2, 3, and 5
but each returns the same message: no more proccesses
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 09, 2002 11:15 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: Re: [leaf-user] Dachstein firewall monitor
Wrigglesworth, Colin wrote:
Do you really mean it was working now has stopped? I
haven't seen it work
yet on my Dachstein CD 1.0.2 so would
Wrigglesworth, Colin wrote:
Do you really mean it was working now has stopped? I haven't seen it work
yet on my Dachstein CD 1.0.2 so would be interested to know if you have had
it working. I thought my problem was Java related but maybe not.
well, I've seen it working on plenty of Dachtstein
Since Weblet ran out of the box on the images I tried, I tend to agree
with you that it indeed is a Java related problem on your browser - but
lacking any info what it is (or isn't) doing, I could only speculate on
what's happening.
Well, the only reasons I've ever seen for failure is
Duncan Napier wrote:
Hi,
I was wondering if Dachstein is still being maintained, and if so
whether there are any plans to update the IPSec components to something
newer than FreeS/WAN 1.9.6?
Essentially, the issue is that certain types of malformed IPSec packets
can cause kernel panics in
Charles,
You hit the problem right on the head, then I guess you would.
I ended up modifying the qmail init script to create the 'missing'
directories because it was simple and the qmail298 script takes care of any
permissions problems I might have got wrong.
I didn't quite follow how to
although i have no expierence setting up qmail, its possible it could be a
couple of different problems, check the load order, you said in your email
that you load qmail manually, if this is the case, make sure the qmail
package is the last one loaded, just in case.
if that doesn't work, load it
Wrigglesworth, Colin wrote:
I am encountering a problem with adding the qmail.lrp package to my
Dachstein-CD setup.
I have tried both loading the package by floppy and by adding it to a custom
copy of the CD. The problem manifests itself only on rebooting the router
after adding qmail to the
Spot on. I had bash.lrp loaded!
So this leads me on to asking if you could add an entry for bash on
you packages page at http://lrp.steinkuehler.net/Packages.htm
http://lrp.steinkuehler.net/Packages.htm stating that installing the bash
package, therefore changing the default
Brad Ray,
Thanks for your help and now I have managed to access Jacques Nilo's
LEAF website I'm in a much better position to work out what's happening. We
had a major failure yesterday which took the whole network down and when it
came back up dnscache was running! I must have changed
Wrigglesworth, Colin wrote:
Didn't take me log to find out what the brain dead problem istinydns
isn't running. Why?...well I don't actually know but I'm sure this has got
something to do with it:
# /etc/init.d/tinydns start
/etc/init.d/tinydns start: UID: readonly variable
#
So what is
A preliminary comment -- please be more careful about use of upper and
lower case in your reporting. I'm inclined to believe that your interface
variables really are eth0 and eth1, not (as you report them) Eth0 and Eth1,
and I doubt your LAN-side SuSE server is named both pingu-serv and
A small addition to Ray's already comprehensive analysis...
On Tue, 12 Nov 2002 10:53:38 PST Ray O. wrote:
Now, the tcpdump traffic you report is --
17:07:30.870333 pingu-serv.farside.net.vfo
193.37.83.1.domain: 58405+
PTR? 81.83.37.193.in-addr.arpa. (43) (DF)
At 02:44 PM 11/12/02 -0500, Brad Fritz wrote:
A small addition to Ray's already comprehensive analysis...
[...]
3. You have dnscache listening on port 193.37.83.1:53 and traffic
is allowed to it through the packet filter, but
/etc/dnscache/env/IPQUERY does not include a line that allows
Good catch, Ray. As usual, you were spot on. Details below...
On Tue, 12 Nov 2002 12:30:19 PST Ray Olszewski wrote:
At 02:44 PM 11/12/02 -0500, Brad Fritz wrote:
A small addition to Ray's already comprehensive analysis...
[...]
3. You have dnscache listening on port 193.37.83.1:53 and
, 2002 7:25 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Richard Doyle
Subject: RE: [leaf-user] Dachstein work laptop on home
network using WinXP
OK _ I think I started something here.I am using the alternate IP
address in WinXP and using DHCP on workl and home connections.
I have DHCP working on both
PROTECTED]
Cc: Richard Doyle
Subject: Re: [leaf-user] Dachstein work laptop on home network using
WinXP
Any help is most welcome on how to get the work DNS from populating
while at
home, so I can use the laptop on the internet.
Well, I haven't made the leap to XP yet, but earlier versions
Hi James
handling mail services is a bit off topic here, you will get detailed
information concerning mail and DNS on the respective forums, if you get
everything set up you won't have to use an ip address anymore, please don't
forget the open relay topic.
Have fun
Erich
James Duberg wrote
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:leaf-user-admin;lists.sourceforge.net]On Behalf Of Erich Titl
Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 12:37 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [leaf-user] Dachstein - port forward SMTP?
Hi James
handling mail services is a bit off topic here, you will get detailed
-
From: Charles Steinkuehler [mailto:charles;steinkuehler.net]
Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 4:00 PM
To: Kevin; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [leaf-user] Dachstein work laptop on home network using
WinXP
Problem is work and home networks use DHCP, work also uses WINS with a
static IP address
On Wed, 2002-10-23 at 13:06, Kevin wrote:
I have a fully working network using DHCP, Dachstein 1.02 two floppy
version.
Work just gave me a laptop with WinXP installed. In the documents, I see
where you can have two ip stacks and WinXP will use the correct stack.
Well, sort of. Your mail
while at
home, so I can use the laptop on the internet.
Thanks
-Original Message-
From: Richard Doyle [mailto:rdoyle;islandnetworks.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 6:00 PM
To: Kevin
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [leaf-user] Dachstein work laptop on home network using
WinXP
Any help is most welcome on how to get the work DNS from populating
while at
home, so I can use the laptop on the internet.
Well, I haven't made the leap to XP yet, but earlier versions of 'doze
had the ability to manually enter DNS servers, or to get them via DHCP.
In Win2K, this is in
I am trying to set up a VPN with IPsec - Dachstein v1.0.2-ipsec
(modified by
Lynn Avant). I am using VmWare on a W2000 for the test environment.
My test configuration is (192.168.1.254 /
12.247.85.201) -(VMnet2)- (212.247.85.202 / 192.168.2.254)
ping from 212.247.85.201 to
Thanks for responding, Ray.
I have added the diagnostic info described at leaf support.
A couple of comments...I think your main problem is you're not allowing
the mail packets through the input firewall rules. Since you're using a
PRIVATE DMZ, and port-forwarding your external firewall IP to
As I look through the firewall ruleset ... the input chain specifically ...
I don't see a rule to ACCEPT port-25 traffic. Nor do I see one to ACCEPT
port-80 traffic (but you did say the Web server worked, didn't you?).
WIth that as a hint, I *think* I've spotted the error in the config file.
Ray Olszewski wrote:
As I look through the firewall ruleset ... the input chain specifically
... I don't see a rule to ACCEPT port-25 traffic. Nor do I see one to
ACCEPT port-80 traffic (but you did say the Web server worked, didn't
you?).
WIth that as a hint, I *think* I've spotted
1 - 100 of 432 matches
Mail list logo
