Re: [newbie] Supermount?

2004-07-20 Thread Mikkel L. Ellertson
Paul Kaplan wrote: I am running 10.0 on a laptop. I have a USB2 external drive. When I originally added the drive it was formatted as a single vfat partition which mounted at /mnt/removable. I subsequently re-formatted it into three ext3 partitions /dev/sda1-3 and set them to mount at a diffe

[newbie] Supermount?

2004-07-20 Thread Paul Kaplan
I am running 10.0 on a laptop. I have a USB2 external drive. When I originally added the drive it was formatted as a single vfat partition which mounted at /mnt/removable. I subsequently re-formatted it into three ext3 partitions /dev/sda1-3 and set them to mount at a different location. Afte

Re: [newbie] Supermount in 10.0

2004-03-20 Thread robin
Tom Brinkman wrote: On Saturday 20 March 2004 08:52 am, Bryan Phinney wrote: 10.0 should not be using Supermount for the CD-ROMs any longer. There is a new version called magicdev that performs the same function as supermount, it automatically mounts removable media when inserted. Yes, but

Re: [newbie] Supermount in 10.0

2004-03-20 Thread Bryan Phinney
On Saturday 20 March 2004 11:11 am, Tom Brinkman wrote: > Yes, but this isn't quite the whole story. Supermount-ng in > the latest kernels is a better solution than magicdev. Even the > Mandrake developers involved have said so on the cooker ML, an > alluded to the fact that making magicdev

Re: [newbie] Supermount in 10.0

2004-03-20 Thread Tom Brinkman
On Saturday 20 March 2004 08:52 am, Bryan Phinney wrote: > 10.0 should not be using Supermount for the CD-ROMs any longer. >  There is a new version called magicdev that performs the same > function as supermount, it automatically mounts removable media > when inserted. Yes, but this isn't qu

Re: [newbie] supermount

2003-06-10 Thread Jason
Glad it worked, guess it doesn't matter bout the icons now!! If you really want them, drag them from konqueror onto your desktop. Looks purtier IMHO without them anyway... =) Chris wrote: On Tuesday 10 June 2003 07:14 pm, Jason wrote: Try disabling supermount, then run Kwikdisk (not kwickdis

Re: [newbie] supermount

2003-06-10 Thread Chris
On Tuesday 10 June 2003 07:14 pm, Jason wrote: > Try disabling supermount, then run Kwikdisk (not kwickdisk), which is a > GUI FS mounting tool. It runs in the panel. Simply right click on the > icon and then left click on the partition/device you want mounted. Easy > Peasy. > > HTH > > Jason Than

Re: [newbie] supermount

2003-06-10 Thread Jason
Try disabling supermount, then run Kwikdisk (not kwickdisk), which is a GUI FS mounting tool. It runs in the panel. Simply right click on the icon and then left click on the partition/device you want mounted. Easy Peasy. HTH Jason Chris wrote: On Tuesday 10 June 2003 06:17 pm, Aron Smith wro

Re: [newbie] supermount

2003-06-10 Thread Aron Smith
On Tue, 2003-06-10 at 16:39, Chris wrote: > On Tuesday 10 June 2003 06:17 pm, Aron Smith wrote: > > Did you try Kwickdisk? > > > > On Tue, 2003-06-10 at 15:55, Chris wrote: > > > First the reason I'm writing this is that my hd died Sunday night, had to > > > go out and buy a new one completely relo

Re: [newbie] supermount

2003-06-10 Thread Chris
On Tuesday 10 June 2003 06:17 pm, Aron Smith wrote: > Did you try Kwickdisk? > > On Tue, 2003-06-10 at 15:55, Chris wrote: > > First the reason I'm writing this is that my hd died Sunday night, had to > > go out and buy a new one completely reload from scratch. I'm having a > > problem now with my

Re: [newbie] supermount

2003-06-10 Thread Aron Smith
Did you try Kwickdisk? On Tue, 2003-06-10 at 15:55, Chris wrote: > First the reason I'm writing this is that my hd died Sunday night, had to go > out and buy a new one completely reload from scratch. I'm having a problem > now with my cdrom's and floppy. I disabled supermount with 'supermount -

[newbie] supermount

2003-06-10 Thread Chris
First the reason I'm writing this is that my hd died Sunday night, had to go out and buy a new one completely reload from scratch. I'm having a problem now with my cdrom's and floppy. I disabled supermount with 'supermount -i disable' as root. When I had done this on the previous 9.0 install

Re: [newbie] supermount problems mandrake 9.1

2003-06-02 Thread Anne Wilson
On Monday 02 Jun 2003 8:33 am, shaun feeley wrote: > hey mark thanks for your reply, > heres the relavent part of my fstab file. > as you can see the original entry using supermount is hashed out.. > i have tried to use this other entry nut it doent work, > > recieving error something like, no dev

Re: [newbie] supermount problems mandrake 9.1

2003-06-02 Thread shaun feeley
hey mark thanks for your reply, heres the relavent part of my fstab file. as you can see the original entry using supermount is hashed out.. i have tried to use this other entry nut it doent work, recieving error something like, no device in medium. the supermount entry will not let me mount or um

[newbie] supermount problems mandrake 9.1

2003-05-30 Thread shaun
hi guys, im having constant problems trying to mount cdrom in mandrake 9.1. getting input/output errors. think its due to supermount which still doesnt seem to work properly (for me anyway perhaps) any ideas would be greatly appeciated. read somewhere theres probs with supermount under root use

RE: [newbie] supermount

2003-03-24 Thread Tsur, Oren
: [newbie] supermount If turning off supermount is applied right away (which I assume is the case), no, it didn't work. I was trying to make a boot disk with no luck, turned off supermount, tried again -without- re opening the control center or anything, and it still didn't work. R On Fr

Re: [newbie] supermount

2003-03-22 Thread R.L.M.
Also, I appear to be able to format floppy disks -- but when it comes to reading them or adding onto the floppy the errors happen. R On Fri, 2003-03-21 at 17:04, Benjamin Jeeves wrote: > Hi Rachel > > I have had that problem to with my floppy but found it to be the disk. Ones > that I have use

Re: [newbie] supermount

2003-03-22 Thread R.L.M.
That could be it. Though I recall being able to use these same disks on Mandrake 7.2 when I first had it. Then I got a new motherboard and such, and a friend did some stuff with the kernel (which I honestly don't know much about). And now the floppy is floppy. R On Fri, 2003-03-21 at 17:04, Be

Re: [newbie] supermount

2003-03-22 Thread R.L.M.
If turning off supermount is applied right away (which I assume is the case), no, it didn't work. I was trying to make a boot disk with no luck, turned off supermount, tried again -without- re opening the control center or anything, and it still didn't work. R On Fri, 2003-03-21 at 17:00, Miark

Re: [newbie] supermount

2003-03-21 Thread Benjamin Jeeves
Hi Rachel I have had that problem to with my floppy but found it to be the disk. Ones that I have used on a windows system are the main problem but found that if I format them on the Linux box it works fine. If it had info I need then I would try a different computer that work for me too. On F

Re: [newbie] supermount

2003-03-21 Thread Miark
On 21 Mar 2003 16:41:25 -0500 "R.L.M." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Both my CDROM and Floppy are set to supermount. CDROM works fine, but > my Floppy is giving me errors... input/output error, you do not have > permission, etc. Any idea why my floppy isn't working (I just got a new > one thinkin

[newbie] supermount

2003-03-21 Thread R.L.M.
Both my CDROM and Floppy are set to supermount. CDROM works fine, but my Floppy is giving me errors... input/output error, you do not have permission, etc. Any idea why my floppy isn't working (I just got a new one thinking it was the floppy itself..)? Rachel On Fri, 2003-03-21 at 16:24, Miark

Re: [newbie] supermount :-/

2003-01-06 Thread Angus Auld
Chris Edwards wrote: > Mr. Auld, > > I am not an expert and the following may be slightly incorrect, but AFAIK ... > > The supermount option applies to removeable drives; the noauto option applies to >harddrives which are always "present" or "connected". The only way to disable >supermount is t

Re: [newbie] supermount :-/

2003-01-06 Thread Chris Edwards
Mr. Auld, I am not an expert and the following may be slightly incorrect, but AFAIK ... The supermount option applies to removeable drives; the noauto option applies to harddrives which are always "present" or "connected". The only way to disable supermount is to explicitly deselect "supermount".

Re: [newbie] Supermount/devfs/v9.0 question.

2003-01-06 Thread Ronald J. Hall
On Monday 06 January 2003 01:26 pm, Anne Wilson wrote: > I have no supermount any more on my LS120 - accidental, but there you are. > The point I was trying to make, was that whether there is any risk in a > wholesale disabling of supermount or not, disabling supermount specific > derives certainl

Re: [newbie] Supermount/devfs/v9.0 question.

2003-01-06 Thread Anne Wilson
On Monday 06 Jan 2003 6:18 am, Ronald J. Hall wrote: > On Monday 06 January 2003 06:51 am, Anne Wilson wrote: > > It's simple to disable on specific devices from MCC. I think that all > > it's doing is removing 'supermount' from fstab and replacing it with > > 'auto' - but I can't be sure there's

Re: [newbie] Supermount/devfs/v9.0 question.

2003-01-06 Thread Ronald J. Hall
On Monday 06 January 2003 06:51 am, Anne Wilson wrote: > It's simple to disable on specific devices from MCC. I think that all it's > doing is removing 'supermount' from fstab and replacing it with 'auto' - > but I can't be sure there's nothing else, so I go the gui way. > > Anne Hi Anne! Thanks

[newbie] Supermount/devfs/v9.0 question.

2003-01-05 Thread Ronald J. Hall
If I disable supermount, which I traditionally do with every Mandrake release, will I lose the "hot plug 'n play" ability with USB devices? I mean like plugging in cameras, smart cards, Kangaroo drives, etc, etc? If so, can I just disable supermount for specific devices and not all? Like my fl

Re: [newbie] supermount :-/ (Dennis)

2002-12-27 Thread Angus Auld
* Angus Auld wrote: > > Thanks Dennis for your reply. I thought there was some special precedure > > to create the icons that would allow me to mount/unmount. Sorry if I didn't > > communicate very clearly what I was trying to do. I

Re: [newbie] supermount :-/ (Dennis)

2002-12-27 Thread Dennis Myers
On Friday 27 December 2002 11:38 am, Angus Auld wrote: > - Original Message - > From: Dennis Myers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Fri, 27 Dec 2002 10:46:44 -0600 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [newbie] supermount :-/ > > > On Friday 27 December 2

Re: [newbie] supermount :-/

2002-12-27 Thread Anne Wilson
On Friday 27 Dec 2002 5:25 pm, Angus Auld wrote: > - Original Message - > From: Anne Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Fri, 27 Dec 2002 16:53:40 + > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [newbie] supermount :-/ > > > On Friday 27 Dec 2002 3:04 pm, Angus

Re: [newbie] supermount :-/ (Dennis)

2002-12-27 Thread Angus Auld
- Original Message - From: Dennis Myers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Fri, 27 Dec 2002 10:46:44 -0600 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [newbie] supermount :-/ > On Friday 27 December 2002 09:04 am, Angus Auld wrote: > > Greetings, I think I have come to the conclusion

Re: [newbie] supermount :-/

2002-12-27 Thread Angus Auld
- Original Message - From: Anne Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Fri, 27 Dec 2002 16:53:40 + To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [newbie] supermount :-/ > On Friday 27 Dec 2002 3:04 pm, Angus Auld wrote: > > Greetings, I think I have come to the conclusion that

Re: [newbie] supermount :-/

2002-12-27 Thread Anne Wilson
On Friday 27 Dec 2002 3:04 pm, Angus Auld wrote: > Greetings, I think I have come to the conclusion that supermount is a > "great mystery" to me. Perhaps the name should be changed to "maybemount"? > > It seems to work at times, but then other times it doesn't. This is not a > satisfying relationsh

Re: [newbie] supermount :-/

2002-12-27 Thread Dennis Myers
On Friday 27 December 2002 09:04 am, Angus Auld wrote: > Greetings, I think I have come to the conclusion that supermount is a > "great mystery" to me. Perhaps the name should be changed to "maybemount"? > > It seems to work at times, but then other times it doesn't. This is not a > satisfying rela

Re: [newbie] supermount investigation

2002-11-27 Thread Technoslick
typing. Thanks for your help on thisnow to get everyone else to participate. T - Original Message - From: "Anne Wilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2002 8:05 AM Subject: Re: [newbie] supermount investigation > &

Re: [newbie] supermount investigation

2002-11-27 Thread Anne Wilson
> > A thought that came to mind was to duplicate the subscription process of a > listserv. Let's assume that the Subject line of system info postings will > be "Supermount - Systems Results". The first lines of the form include > verbiage something like: "Do not reply to this post! All replies are

Re: [newbie] supermount investigation

2002-11-27 Thread Technoslick
nd handle that no one will post anything. What do you think? T - Original Message - From: "Anne Wilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2002 5:40 AM Subject: Re: [newbie] supermount investigation This is deliberately top-poste

Re: [newbie] supermount investigation

2002-11-27 Thread Anne Wilson
, Anne. > > T > > - Original Message - > From: "Anne Wilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 5:41 PM > Subject: Re: [newbie] supermount > > > I've stuck to the format of John's s

Re: [newbie] supermount

2002-11-26 Thread Michael Adams
why you > want SCSI emulation on the drive? Is it also a burner? I would like to know > what you want this set-up. > > Thanks, > > T > > - Original Message - > From: "Anne Wilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Tuesday

Re: [newbie] supermount

2002-11-26 Thread Anne Wilson
On Tuesday 26 Nov 2002 4:47 pm, Technoslick wrote: > From: "Anne Wilson" > After I couldn't get it to work, I tried 'eroast', and that has worked > flawlessly for me. I guess once something works for me, I tend to stay with > it. I looked at that under 8.2, but couldn't get any sense out of it. I

Re: [newbie] supermount

2002-11-26 Thread Technoslick
From: "Anne Wilson" >I used to do it regularly on Nero. I've had a couple of cds ruined by playing >them in the car, so I don't risk it any more. I make a copy for car use. Yeah, I have done it for those reasons, too. I refuse to bring originals into the car. I am a real fuss about this, as wel

Re: [newbie] supermount

2002-11-26 Thread Anne Wilson
On Tuesday 26 Nov 2002 2:33 pm, Technoslick wrote: > From: "Anne Wilson" > > >No, but I wanted the convenience of being able to read from the dvd and > write > >to the cd-rw, but XCDroast couldn't see it. I understand k3b (I think > > it's called) could do it anyway, so I'll look at that when I've

Re: [newbie] supermount

2002-11-26 Thread Technoslick
From: "Anne Wilson" >No, but I wanted the convenience of being able to read from the dvd and write >to the cd-rw, but XCDroast couldn't see it. I understand k3b (I think it's >called) could do it anyway, so I'll look at that when I've a moment. I haven't tried burning 'on-the-fly' with Linux, as

Re: [newbie] supermount

2002-11-26 Thread Anne Wilson
On Tuesday 26 Nov 2002 12:26 pm, Technoslick wrote: > Hi, Anne, > > I never noticed your interest in having your DVD set-up with SCSI emulation > until now. I am a bit baffled. I have a Liteon DVD-ROM player in my > multi-boot XP Pro/Mandrake 9.0 box, so I looked at my fstab to see how mine > is se

Re: [newbie] supermount

2002-11-26 Thread Technoslick
: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 2:42 AM Subject: Re: [newbie] supermount On Tuesday 26 Nov 2002 5:54 am, Michael Adams wrote: > > Anne i have a similar setup (on 8.2) in as far as i have > hdc SAMSUNG DVD-ROM SD-606F > hdd ACER 4X4X32 CD-RW > > They b

Re: [newbie] supermount

2002-11-25 Thread Anne Wilson
On Tuesday 26 Nov 2002 5:54 am, Michael Adams wrote: > > Anne i have a similar setup (on 8.2) in as far as i have > hdc SAMSUNG DVD-ROM SD-606F > hdd ACER 4X4X32 CD-RW > > They both work well on supermount although i am carefull with konq when in > /mnt , if i try to eject konq closes the tray agai

Re: [newbie] supermount

2002-11-25 Thread Michael Adams
On Tue, 26 Nov 2002 11:41, Anne Wilson wrote: > I've stuck to the format of John's so far as I can. There may have to be > an 'other info' column if we are going to try to collate this info, as > there will be many cases of one-offs, I think. > > It's interesting, though. The survey has made me t

Re: [newbie] supermount

2002-11-25 Thread Technoslick
, or shows their working config file. They are the 'priceless' in my book. Thanks for the insight, Anne. T - Original Message - From: "Anne Wilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 5:41 PM Subject: Re: [newbie] supermou

Re: [newbie] supermount

2002-11-25 Thread Anne Wilson
I've stuck to the format of John's so far as I can. There may have to be an 'other info' column if we are going to try to collate this info, as there will be many cases of one-offs, I think. It's interesting, though. The survey has made me think a bit about some problems I've had, and things

Re: [newbie] supermount

2002-11-25 Thread John Richard Smith
Technoslick wrote: Thanks for taking the initiative to start us off, John. Once I see that we have a few entries, I will contact Mandrake directly and make sure that they know what we are doing. T By all means criticize it, I only meant it to be an example. Seems to me, for what it's worth,

Re: [newbie] supermount

2002-11-25 Thread Technoslick
Thanks for taking the initiative to start us off, John. Once I see that we have a few entries, I will contact Mandrake directly and make sure that they know what we are doing. T Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com

[newbie] supermount

2002-11-25 Thread John Richard Smith
Subject: supermount Contact: John Richard Smith Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Machine: My machine System Specs Make: self build Model:no model CPU: 1800 Athlon XP (palomino) CPU Model:

Re: [newbie] Supermount Toubleshooting Tips & Info

2002-11-24 Thread Technoslick
Anne, and all: (Looking at the "First suspect - me" thread...it has traveled quite far and abroad compared to what it was first intended for. :-) So, I started a new one...) Since everything here is archived, I really like the idea that we organized what we have found to make it easier for searc

Re: [newbie] Supermount and scsi-emulated devices

2002-11-22 Thread John Richard Smith
Miark wrote: On Fri, 22 Nov 2002 16:22:35 + John Richard Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Miark, Could you let me have your fstab entry for the cdrom devices, Thanks Sure: none /mnt/cdrom supermount dev=/dev/scd0,fs=auto,ro,--,iocharset=iso8859-1,codepage=850,umask=0 0 0 none /m

Re: [newbie] Supermount and scsi-emulated devices

2002-11-22 Thread Miark
On Fri, 22 Nov 2002 16:22:35 + John Richard Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Miark, > > Could you let me have your fstab entry for the cdrom devices, > > Thanks Sure: none /mnt/cdrom supermount dev=/dev/scd0,fs=auto,ro,--,iocharset=iso8859-1,codepage=850,umask=0 0 0 none /mnt/cdrom2 su

[newbie] Supermount and scsi-emulated devices

2002-11-22 Thread John Richard Smith
John, I use Supermount and have two scsi-emulated drives. Never had a single problem, and I don't baby it in any way, shape, or form. Miark Miark, Could you let me have your fstab entry for the cdrom devices, Thanks -- John Richard Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] Want to buy your Pack or Service

Re: [newbie] Supermount to work correctly in MDK 9? [Replied]

2002-10-17 Thread G_REEPER
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Pardon me while I catch up with the responses. 1. Yes oddly enough the urpmi *.rpm command does indeed work. 2. While flattered, I hadn't been considered a newbie since slackware 1.0 or so but thanks for making me feel young again. While moving sof

[newbie] supermount

2002-09-30 Thread Colin Jenkins
Hi all, I have heard that there is a problem with supermount in mdk9.0 I installed it on my home machine with few probs. (cd and floppy work, but not zip drive) Installed from the same cd's on a hp netserver at school today, and although

Re: [newbie] supermount problem?

2002-08-09 Thread Joseph Braddock
I've run into this when I'm logged in as a regular user and have a CD mounted and then open a terminal window and SU as root and change the CD. It appears that mtab shows both the regular user and root CDs. When it happens, the regular user gets all kinds of wierd things (i.e. can't eject cdr

Re: [newbie] supermount problem?

2002-08-09 Thread John Richard Smith
Marc Audard wrote: >Hi > >Although my data CDs are mounted automatically, >some directories cannot be stat'ed. I had to mount >manually the CD-ROM (which turned out to have two >/mnt/cdrom entries in mtab) for it to work. I guess >I will have to remove the supermount entry in /etc/fstab. > >Does

[newbie] supermount problem?

2002-08-09 Thread Marc Audard
Hi Although my data CDs are mounted automatically, some directories cannot be stat'ed. I had to mount manually the CD-ROM (which turned out to have two /mnt/cdrom entries in mtab) for it to work. I guess I will have to remove the supermount entry in /etc/fstab. Does anyone know about this? Marc

Re: [newbie] Supermount survey...

2002-05-14 Thread Kaj Haulrich
On Tuesday 14 May 2002 12:35 pm, David wrote: > Kaj Haulrich said onto me: > > Same here. Supermount is confused especially by floppies. Furthermore I > suspect it for not being able to play an ordinary music-CD (KDE CD-player > at least), because CD's don't have to be mounted while playing. I'm

Re: [newbie] Supermount survey...

2002-05-14 Thread darklord
On Monday 13 May 2002 06:13 pm, you wrote: > Same here. Supermount is confused especially by floppies. Furthermore I > suspect it for not being able to play an ordinary music-CD (KDE CD-player > at least), because CD's don't have to be mounted while playing. I'm going > back to 8.1 if I can't fig

Re: [newbie] Supermount survey...

2002-05-14 Thread John Richard Smith
On Monday 13 May 2002 23:51, you wrote: > On Tuesday 14 May 2002 01:37, John Richard Smith wrote: > > On Monday 13 May 2002 17:54, you wrote: > > > On Mon, 13 May 2002 11:27:52 -0400 > > > > > > darklord <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I'm just curious, and would like to get everyone's input on

Re: [newbie] Supermount survey...

2002-05-13 Thread John McQuillen
On Tue, 2002-05-14 at 01:27, darklord wrote: > I'm just curious, and would like to get everyone's input on Supermount. After > running so long without it under v8.1, and now using it again under v8.2, > well - I'm just about ready to disable it again. Can everyone just comment on > whether or n

Re: [newbie] Supermount survey...

2002-05-13 Thread Derek Jennings
> > On Monday 13 May 2002 09:27 am, darklord wrote: > > > I'm just curious, and would like to get everyone's input on Supermount. > > > After running so long without it under v8.1, and now using it again > > > under v8.2, well - I'm just about ready to disable it again. Can > > > everyone just co

Re: [newbie] Supermount survey...

2002-05-13 Thread LtCdData
On Monday 13 May 2002 8:15 pm, you wrote: guess what I use supermount :-)) works fine for me everytime > On Monday 13 May 2002 09:27 am, darklord wrote: > > I'm just curious, and would like to get everyone's input on Supermount. > > After running so long without it under v8.1, and now using it ag

Re: [newbie] Supermount survey...

2002-05-13 Thread Robin
On Tuesday 14 May 2002 01:37, John Richard Smith wrote: > On Monday 13 May 2002 17:54, you wrote: > > On Mon, 13 May 2002 11:27:52 -0400 > > > > darklord <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I'm just curious, and would like to get everyone's input on > > > Supermount. After running so long without it

Re: [newbie] Supermount survey...

2002-05-13 Thread David
Kaj Haulrich said onto me: -- | I'm going back to 8.1 if I can't figure out how to disable it. drakconf -> mount points -> [cd rom/cd burner/dvd rom] -> options -> uncheck supermount, click OK -> Done, click OK |

Re: [newbie] Supermount survey...

2002-05-13 Thread Kaj Haulrich
On Monday 13 May 2002 10:49 pm, Seedkum Aladeem wrote: > On Monday 13 May 2002 08:27 am, you wrote: > > I'm just curious, and would like to get everyone's input on Supermount. > > After running so long without it under v8.1, and now using it again under > > v8.2, well - I'm just about ready to dis

Re: [newbie] Supermount survey...

2002-05-13 Thread Seedkum Aladeem
On Monday 13 May 2002 08:27 am, you wrote: > I'm just curious, and would like to get everyone's input on Supermount. > After running so long without it under v8.1, and now using it again under > v8.2, well - I'm just about ready to disable it again. Can everyone just > comment on whether or not th

Re: [newbie] Supermount survey...

2002-05-13 Thread Damian G
On Mon, 13 May 2002 11:27:52 -0400 darklord <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm just curious, and would like to get everyone's input on Supermount. After > running so long without it under v8.1, and now using it again under v8.2, > well - I'm just about ready to disable it again. Can everyone just

Re: [newbie] Supermount

2002-03-26 Thread Roy Murray
- Original Message - From: "Robin Turner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 6:10 PM Subject: Re: [newbie] Supermount > Try something simpler like > > /mnt/cdrom /mnt/cdrom supermount fs=iso9660,dev=/dev/cdrom 0 0 &

[newbie] Supermount

2002-03-26 Thread Guilherme Cirne
Hi, I am unable to get supermount to work in LM 8.1. After running supermount -i enable my /etc/fstab looks like this: /dev/hda6 / ext2 defaults 1 1 none /dev/pts devpts mode=0620 0 0 none /dev/shm tmpfs defaults 0 0 /dev/hda8 /home ext2 defaults 1 2 /mnt/cdrom /mnt/cdrom supermount

Re: [newbie] supermount kernel

2002-01-21 Thread shane
On Monday 21 January 2002 11:14, you spoke unto me thusly: > Is it because mandrake never add functionality to a distro instead > prefering to leave it to the next version of the distro?? like the way the slackers don't have anyway to update like a software manager or maybe a way for users to t

[newbie] supermount kernel

2002-01-21 Thread Franki
Hi all, Since the newer cooker kernels seem to be fine with supermount, why has mandrake not put on in updates that will allow people to use supermount without resorting to installing cooker kernels? Is it because mandrake never add functionality to a distro instead prefering to leave it to the

Re: [newbie] Supermount fixed-..... Or is it..

2001-10-20 Thread Derek Jennings
Nope, still no joy I tried all sorts of combinations of fstab definitions. I even started getting kernel seg faults when dismounting. Reckon it needs the updated kernel too. I'll just put up without supermount for the time being. Thanks anyway Texstar and keep up the good work... Derek On S

[newbie] Supermount fixed-..... Or is it..

2001-10-19 Thread Derek Jennings
Having spotted the news item on Texstar's page about the bug fix for LM8.1 which fixes the Supermount problem we have been so focussed on recently, I thought I would perform the update. (See here for instructions http://www.linux-mandrake.com/en/security/2001/MDKA-2001-018.php3?dis=8.1 )

Re: [newbie] Supermount & LM8.1 - Getting it to Work - FYI

2001-10-19 Thread Terry
On Friday 19 October 2001 04:13, you wrote: > Sorry it took so long to reply. Have you tried creating an icon on your > desktop for your zip device? That icon should have the "eject" option to > make it more convenient. Unless of course you like using the terminal. > > Sevatio Thanks for the h

Re: [newbie] Supermount & LM8.1 - Getting it to Work - FYI

2001-10-19 Thread Sevatio
t;>>>> Original Message <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< On 10/15/01, 11:49:54 AM, Terry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote regarding Re: [newbie] Supermount & LM8.1 - Getting it to Work - FYI: > On Thursday 11 October 2001 18:34, thou s

Re: [newbie] Supermount and new kernel

2001-03-02 Thread Renato Tognaccini
Francois Massonneau wrote: Hi, I've just installed kernel 2.2.18 and I have 3 things that don't work as before : - Kheader : I solved this one by adding a "0" in the kheader file and it works now. - Supermount : I do not have supermount anymore. How can I do to get it back ? - The alsa drivers I

Re: [newbie] Supermount and new kernel

2001-01-18 Thread Francois Massonneau
> > I've just installed kernel 2.2.18 and I have 3 things that don't work > > as before : > > - Kheader : I solved this one by adding a "0" in the kheader file and > > it works now. > > - Supermount : I do not have supermount anymore. How can I do to get > > it back ? > > - The alsa drivers I have

Re: [newbie] Supermount Samba FS ?

2000-12-11 Thread Renaud OLGIATI
I have added the line /mnt/magc /mnt/magc supermountfs=smbfs, dev=//mags/MAGC,username=ron,password= 0 0 in /etc/fstab. When I reboot, I get the following error message: mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /mnt/magc, or too many mounted file systems The mount point (/mn

Re: [newbie] Supermount Samba FS ?

2000-12-06 Thread Barry Premeaux
Here is the supermount configuration I have. /mnt/cdrom /mnt/cdrom supermount fs=iso9660,dev=/dev/cdrom 0 0 /mnt/floppy /mnt/floppy supermount fs=vfat,dev=/dev/fd0 0 0 I had to turn it off when I needed to format some floppies and when I wanted to create a Emergency Boot disk. You will have

[newbie] Supermount Samba FS ?

2000-12-06 Thread Renaud OLGIATI
I have read in vain man supermount and man fstab, and find no mention of how to use supermount in /etc/fstab. Can it be used to auto-mount the devices on a w**95 box through Samba ? Up to now, I have had to open Konsole, su and mount, and would like to simplify local network access. Tahnks for

Re: [newbie] supermount

2000-11-17 Thread Paul
On Fri, 17 Nov 2000, Bob Schmidt wrote: >If I do what you say I get an error message on boot up, and also if I try to Okay, you probably have to take it out of /etc/mtab too then. (But I am not 100% certain if that is the solution. It won't break anything though, as long as you just use # to com

Re: [newbie] supermount

2000-11-17 Thread Dale Kosan
; Sent: Friday, November 17, 2000 3:48 PM Subject: Re: [newbie] supermount > Hi > > If I do what you say I get an error message on boot up, and also if I try to > mount it by icon that says, "/mnt/floppy is not a block device". But if I > mount it through a terminal

Re: [newbie] supermount

2000-11-17 Thread Bob Schmidt
IL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, November 17, 2000 12:13 PM Subject: Re: [newbie] supermount > On Fri, 17 Nov 2000, Bob Schmidt wrote: > > I think the best thing for you to do is make the floppy no longer > supermount. That way it can't be in your way. > > remove (comment w

[newbie] supermount

2000-11-17 Thread Bob Schmidt
Hi, I have a Dell Inspiron 3700 laptop, I have installed mdk 7.2 on it, and downloaded the updates (kde 2 final). I have two questions, the first is that my cdrom drive (internal) and my floppy drive (external) are both listed as supermount in linuxconf. The only problem is that if I don't have

Re: [newbie] supermount-- I am unable to mount cdrom and floppy

2000-11-11 Thread Robert Maynord
isgusted with this, is there someone at mandrake to talk to?? > Please advise. > Susan > - Original Message - > From: Francisco Alcaraz Ariza > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Saturday, November 11, 2000 3:43 AM > Subject: RE: [newbie] supermount-- I am unable to mount cdrom an

Re: [newbie] supermount-- I am unable to mount cdrom and floppy

2000-11-11 Thread S. Stubbs
am really disgusted with this, is there someone at mandrake to talk to?? Please advise. Susan - Original Message - From: Francisco Alcaraz Ariza To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, November 11, 2000 3:43 AM Subject: RE: [newbie] supermount-- I am unable to mount cdrom and floppy I have

RE: [newbie] supermount-- I am unable to mount cdrom and floppy

2000-11-11 Thread Francisco Alcaraz Ariza
que.com/en/demos/CDburner/pages Have luck Francisco Alcaraz Murcia (Spain) -Mensaje original- De: S. Stubbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Fecha: sábado, 11 de noviembre de 2000 2:44 Asunto: [newbie] supermount-- I am unable to mount cdrom and flo

[Fwd: [newbie] Supermount & 2.2.16-9mdk]

2000-10-03 Thread Joan Tur
Hallo again! Maybe the /var/log/boot.log helps?? Here it is: Oct3 19:02:55 QuiniPC mandrake_everytime: Disabling Supermount succeeded And the system changes "supermount" in /etc/fstab for "iso9660" or "vfat" (CDs/floppy/zip)... Does that help? Thanks!! 8-) Joan Tur escribió: > Hallo ag

Re: [newbie] Supermount & 2.2.16-9mdk

2000-10-01 Thread Larry Marshall
> I've downloaded and compiled this kernel instead of 2.2.15 that comes > with Mandrake 7.1, and answerd yes to the "supermount removable media > support" question. On startup it says it's disabling supermount and so > it is; instead of filesystem type supermount i see iso9660 in > /etc/fst

[newbie] Supermount & 2.2.16-9mdk

2000-10-01 Thread Joan Tur
Hallo again! I've downloaded and compiled this kernel instead of 2.2.15 that comes with Mandrake 7.1, and answerd yes to the "supermount removable media support" question. On startup it says it's disabling supermount and so it is; instead of filesystem type supermount i see iso9660 in /etc/fstab

Re: [newbie] supermount question

2000-08-08 Thread Mark Hillary
Supermount makes using Cd and other removable data transparant. So no you do not need unmount for CD, just press eject on your CD player. To enable supermount (if it is not working), type at the promt supermount enable. If you do in future complie a new kernel, go and get the latest version from

[newbie] supermount question

2000-08-05 Thread Charles Lu
Does anyone know if Supermount in addition to automatically mount disks, also automatically unmount disks? If so, do you still need to use the umount command to eject your disks? Charles __ Do You Yahoo!? Kick off your party with Yahoo! Invites.

Re: [newbie] Supermount Woes

2000-07-05 Thread Larry Marshall
At 09:52 AM 7/5/00 -0700, you wrote: >Larrydon't forget the fact that the dos filesystem doesn't >maintain the Linux permissions of the files stored on it. >You'll have to re-set the permissions after retrieving the >file from the dos formatted floppy. Good point but it would seem an odd circ

Re: [newbie] Supermount Woes

2000-07-05 Thread Alan Shoemaker
Larrydon't forget the fact that the dos filesystem doesn't maintain the Linux permissions of the files stored on it. You'll have to re-set the permissions after retrieving the file from the dos formatted floppy. Alan Larry Marshall wrote: > > > Yeah, I was implying that. I was also

  1   2   >