On 17-Mar-2009, at 08:52, Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 10:01:53AM -0400, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 3/17/2009 9:43 AM, Erwan David wrote:
You may generate the pcre file with a line
/recipient_([...@_]+)@localdomain/recipient+$...@localdomain
for each valid recipient. This
On 19-Mar-2009, at 04:14, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 3/19/2009 5:55 AM, LuKreme wrote:
I came up with this one liner:
$ ls -1 /usr/local/virtual/ | grep @ | sed
's/^\([...@]*\)@\(.*\)$/\/^\1_\(.*\)@\2$\/ \1+$...@\2/'
testu...@example.com = /^testuser_(.*)@example.com$/
testuser+$...@example.com
On 19-Mar-2009, at 04:45, Wietse Venema wrote:
$ ls -1 /usr/local/virtual/ | grep @ | sed 's/^\([...@]*\)@\(.*\)$/
\/
^\1_\(.*\)@\2$\/ \1+$...@\2/'
testu...@example.com = /^testuser_(.*)@example.com$/ testuser+$...@example.com
This is BROKEN. You are not escaping any of the regexp
On 19-Mar-2009, at 04:44, Wietse Venema wrote:
LuKreme:
My server is pretty light weight, and I don't tend to get too many
floods of spammers, but are these defaults reasonable to mitigate the
damage that a flood might do? Are these defaults anything a normal
user is ever going to hit
On 18-Mar-2009, at 02:38, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
* LuKreme krem...@kreme.com:
path to which socket there?
$ ls -ls /var/run/saslauthd/
total 2
0 srwxrwxrwx 1 root postfix 0 Mar 17 03:52 mux
mux it is.
Starting saslauthd.
saslauthd[91067] :main: could not chdir to: /var
On 18-Mar-2009, at 09:07, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
testsaslauthd
$ testsaslauthd -u u...@mysqlhosted.tld -p password
0: NO authentication failed
$ testsaslauthd -u user -p password
0: OK Success.
So I can authenticate against the local users with testsaslauth, but I
cannot over smtp
OK, first question is will I be able to setup smtpd.conf so that it
will support MULTIPLE authentication methods (sql and PAM)? But first,
to get it working.
I am running on a custom port right now to avoid mucking with 587
until everything is working:
2525 inet n - n
On 17-Mar-2009, at 03:15, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
* LuKreme krem...@kreme.com:
OK, first question is will I be able to setup smtpd.conf so that it
will
support MULTIPLE authentication methods (sql and PAM)? But first,
to get
it working.
I am running on a custom port right now to avoid
On 17-Mar-2009, at 04:24, Robert Brooks wrote:
So, what I'd like to do if it's possible, is rewrite f...@bar.example.com
to bar+...@example.com.
I rewrite foo_...@example.com to foo+...@example.com
virtaul.pcre:
/^(.*)_(.*)@example.com$/${1}+$...@example.com
virtual_alias_maps =
On 17-Mar-2009, at 05:01, Charles Marcus wrote:
(not sure if using the 'or' vertical bar will work as expected here)
It's a PCRE. As long as the PCRE is valid it should work.
--
RTFM replies are great, but please specify exactly which FM to R
On 17-Mar-2009, at 06:09, Erwan David wrote:
I would fear it breaks recipient validation, accepting mail for eavery
address with a _ as valid.
That is a drawback. The other choice is to change the delimiter in
postfix to _ and rewrite it to accept all '+' addresses to '_'. The
trouble is
On 17-Mar-2009, at 07:30, Charles Marcus wrote:
So, is there no way to rewrite the recipient and *then* validate it?
Sure, but not until after you've accepted the message.
It's not like ziggy_test gets delivered to some random user. It's
just that it generates a bounce instead of a reject.
On 17-Mar-2009, at 07:39, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 3/17/2009, LuKreme (krem...@kreme.com) wrote:
It's not like ziggy_test gets delivered to some random user. It's
just that it generates a bounce instead of a reject.
Like I said, this is unacceptable (makes you a backscatter source
On 17-Mar-2009, at 06:29, Stacker Hush wrote:
mynetworks = 127.0.0.0/8, 192.0.0.0/8, 10.0.0.0/8, 172.0.0.0/8
That does not mean what I think you think it means. The only class A
private IP space is 10/8 and 127/8. The others are 192.168/15 and I
think 172.16.0.0/12?
However, even this
On 17-Mar-2009, at 08:01, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 3/17/2009 9:43 AM, Erwan David wrote:
You may generate the pcre file with a line
/recipient_([...@_]+)@localdomain/recipient+$...@localdomain
for each valid recipient. This would preserve the validation of
recipient at RCPT TO stage.
On 17-Mar-2009, at 03:49, LuKreme wrote:
I've made sure that /var/run/saslauthd/ is owned by root:postfix (it
was root:mail) and have removed the authdaemon_path line and am
trying again. Hopefully this was it.
That wasn't it, and the ownership by root:mail shouldn't matter as the
postfix
On 17-Mar-2009, at 11:47, Andreas Winkelmann wrote:
On 17-Mar-2009, at 03:49, LuKreme wrote:
I've made sure that /var/run/saslauthd/ is owned by root:postfix (it
was root:mail) and have removed the authdaemon_path line and am
trying again. Hopefully this was it.
That wasn't
On 17-Mar-2009, at 13:45, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
smtpd_sasl_security_options = noplaintext, noanonymous
smtpd_sasl_tls_security_options = noanonymous
As for the PAM part in the sasl authentication, start saslauthd like
this:
saslauthd -a pam -m /path/to/the/socket
path to which
On 17-Mar-2009, at 17:18, Cedric Zeline wrote:
I need some help. I would like to modify incoming emails.
I need to add a link at top of the incoming mail body, in order to
allow employees that received their email to click on this link and
connect directly to our data base to check the
On 15-Mar-2009, at 14:25, Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 12:27:37PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
smtpd_tls_session_cache_database = btree:$data_directory/
smtpd_sessions
postfix/smtpd[67779]: fatal: open database /var/db/postfix/
smtpd_sessions.db: No such file or directory
On 15-Mar-2009, at 17:08, mouss wrote:
LuKreme a écrit :
I can connect now to the submission port from my MUA (mail.app) as
long
as I authenticate against the sasldb. I cannot connect from the
command-line with openssl s_client:
no you can't. which is why Noel added connectivity to his
On 13-Mar-2009, at 14:51, Jorey Bump wrote:
submission inet n - n - - smtpd
-o smtpd_tls_security_level=encrypt
-o smtpd_sasl_auth_enable=yes
-o smtpd_client_restrictions=permit_sasl_authenticated,reject
Yeah, once I get TLS setup. I am running 2.5.6. I did
On 13-Mar-2009, at 14:51, Jorey Bump wrote:
submission inet n - n - - smtpd
-o smtpd_tls_security_level=encrypt
-o smtpd_sasl_auth_enable=yes
-o smtpd_client_restrictions=permit_sasl_authenticated,reject
Yeah, once I get TLS setup. I am running 2.5.6. I did
On 14-Mar-2009, at 13:02, mouss wrote:
test the connection manually:
$ telnet yourserv 587
...
EHLO yourclienthostname
...
QUIT
Right, I do know that. Sorry if I wasn't clear, my only point was
that what was actaully logged under submit was not useful and
expressing disappointment that
In reading http://www.postfix.org/TLS_README.html and all the posts
in the last 15 months with 'smtpd_tls_session_cache_database' in the
subject (all 7 of them!), it is not clear to me how the
smtpd_tls_session_cache_database file is created, or what exactly it
contains. If the file is not
I have the following helo restriction in a pcre file:
!/[[:alpha:]]/REJECT helo non-alpha helo not allowed
I ran it with WARN for quite a while and didn't see any legitimate
messages that hit it, so I moved it to REJECT. However, my mailserver
is starting to see more
On 13-Mar-2009, at 10:49, Bill Cole wrote:
Hi Bill! Postfix is a little more complicated than SIMS, isn't it :)
If you have a good port 587 config in master.cf, you may need no
changes there. My submission entry for a server that accepts no port
25 submission from outside the LAN is:
On Mar 12, 2009, at 9:56, Marc Jauvin m...@r4l.com wrote:
So how can we configure postfix so that it will realize that the
mail should be routed to the NEW MX host?
1) don't top post.
2) Remove the domain from your maps.
On 12-Mar-2009, at 10:50, Marc Jauvin wrote:
Since we have no means to know that the MX records were modified,
then we can't remove those virtual mapping rules from our database.
$ dig mx example.com | grep -A1 ANSWER SECTION | grep MX
I suppose you could run that each day and flag domains
On 10-Mar-2009, at 21:42, Victor Duchovni wrote:
You are supposed to now have just the domains here, and the user
mappings
in virtual_alias_maps.
OK, i thought I tried that when I put the bare domains in
virtual_alias_domains but something else must have been mucked up then.
I did say
On 10-Mar-2009, at 20:43, Glen B wrote:
Why no TZ was set in the chroot, I'm clueless
Because the chroot jail doesn't have access to read the TMZ information?
--
I draw the line at 7 unreturned phone calls.
On 10-Mar-2009, at 21:48, Sahil Tandon wrote:
The lookup key for virtual_alias_DOMAINS should be a domain name,
not full address. Are you going to reply with some more sarcastic
pedantry? :-)
Hey now, there's always room for more sarcastic pedantry!
I *think* I have it all straight in my
On 10-Mar-2009, at 18:15, mme...@gmail.com wrote:
when postfix wants to send a bounce message (notifying the rejected
message), my mail system will always try to deliver it directly to
the recipient server (i'm not using a relayhost)... i think i need
to change to
I have a file /etc/postfix/virtual.pcre that contains lines like this:
/^(.*)_(.*)@example.com$/${1}+$...@example.com
/^(.*)_(.*)@example.org$/${1}+$...@example.org
/^(.*)_(.*)@example.net$/${1}+$...@example.net
etc etc. This is to allow the _ to act as an additional address
On 11-Mar-2009, at 08:27, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 3/11/2009 9:38 AM, LuKreme wrote:
I have a file /etc/postfix/virtual.pcre that contains lines like
this:
/^(.*)_(.*)@example.com$/${1}+$...@example.com
/^(.*)_(.*)@example.org$/${1}+$...@example.org
/^(.*)_(.*)@example.net$/${1
On 11-Mar-2009, at 09:14, Noel Jones wrote:
You can optionally use a pcre smtp_generic_maps to rewrite the
recipient back to the original domain.
main.cf
smtp_generic_maps = pcre:/etc/postfix/smtp_generic.pcre
smtp_generic.pcre:
/^(.*)@new\.example\.com$/ $...@example.com
This would need
On 11-Mar-2009, at 14:24, Noel Jones wrote:
No, this is on the existing gateway. Generic rewriting is for
outgoing mail.
http://www.postfix.org/ADDRESS_REWRITING_README.html#generic
Ah. Too bad there is not a similar option for local only mail, then I
could use it to solve my multiple
On 11-Mar-2009, at 15:40, KLaM Postmaster wrote:
I am thinking of switching to Ubuntu 8.10 LTS server, however when I
look at the Postfix configuration it seems somewhat odd.
Yes, everything in Debian is 'somewhat odd'. It's what makes Deb Deb.
I don't want to start a flame war, but I would
On 9-Mar-2009, at 15:58, mouss wrote:
you must understand the difference between
virtual_mailbox_domains
and
virtual_alias_domains
I understand the difference, I have virtual_mailbox_domains assigned
and I don't have virtual_alias_domains :)
Actually, isn't
On 10-Mar-2009, at 06:44, Sahil Tandon wrote:
On Mar 10, 2009, at 4:29 AM, LuKreme krem...@kreme.com wrote:
On 9-Mar-2009, at 15:58, mouss wrote:
you must understand the difference between
virtual_mailbox_domains
and
virtual_alias_domains
I understand the difference, I have
On 10-Mar-2009, at 09:59, Linux Addict wrote:
smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
reject_non_fqdn_sender,
reject_non_fqdn_recipient,
reject_unknown_sender_domain,
reject_unknown_recipient_domain,
I have reject_invalid_hostname here as well (before permit_mynetworks)
permit_mynetworks,
On 10-Mar-2009, at 12:41, Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 12:33:52PM -0600, LuKreme wrote:
Could I simply change my virtual_alias_maps definition above to
virtual_alias_domains? I don't think so. At least how this is
setup, the
mysql_virtual_alias.maps.cf returns the alias
On 10-Mar-2009, at 13:37, Rupert Reid wrote:
Hello All,
I am running postfix (apple version) with MAC OSX10.4.11 client. I
found the following entries in the Console/501/console.log. I am
concerned but do not know what it means. The var/log/mail.log does
not show any errors and seem
On 10-Mar-2009, at 15:22, Victor Duchovni wrote:
None, but the trivial-rewrite service will be saddled with one less
MySQL lookup to determine the address class of a domain. Ideally you
also move virtual_mailbox_domains to its own parameter also, and
don't rely on implicit lookups of that in
On 10-Mar-2009, at 16:06, Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 03:57:04PM -0600, LuKreme wrote:
virtual_alias_domains=[list of domains extracted from virtual]
Yes, provided the latter contains only domain anything entries and
no
address rewrite-address entries
On 10-Mar-2009, at 15:57, LuKreme wrote:
virtual_alias_maps =
pcre:$config_directory/virtual.pcre,
mysql:$config_directory/mysql_virtual_alias_maps.cf
virtual_alias_domains=[list of domains extracted from virtual]
Ugh!
Seems $config_directory/ is not liked by mysql:
whew, it's always
With these settings
virtual_alias_maps =
pcre:$config_directory/virtual.pcre,
mysql:$config_directory/mysql_virtual_alias_maps.cf
virtual_alias_domains = hash:/usr/local/etc/postfix/virtual
I get
mail postfix/smtpd[36156]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from
lists.php.net[216.92.131.4]: 450
On 9-Mar-2009, at 06:31, Noel Jones wrote:
LuKreme wrote:
On 8-Mar-2009, at 19:39, Sahil Tandon wrote:
What happens if you set:
virtual_alias_domains =
in main.cf?
Then all mail to local (non virtual) users bounces with a Relay
access denied error.
Sounds as if you have
I have:
virtual_alias_maps =
hash:/usr/local/etc/postfix/virtual,
pcre:/usr/local/etc/postfix/virtual.pcre,
mysql:/usr/local/etc/postfix/mysql_virtual_alias_maps.cf
testing:
$ postmap -q li...@southgaylord.com hash:/etc/postfix/virtual
$ postmap -q li...@southgaylord.com
On 8-Mar-2009, at 18:18, Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Sun, Mar 08, 2009 at 06:05:19PM -0600, LuKreme wrote:
I have:
virtual_alias_maps =
hash:/usr/local/etc/postfix/virtual,
pcre:/usr/local/etc/postfix/virtual.pcre,
mysql:/usr/local/etc/postfix/mysql_virtual_alias_maps.cf
testing
On 8-Mar-2009, at 18:47, Victor Duchovni wrote:
You probably have an unintential match for the domain in
$virtual_alias_domains.
Here's my postconf:
$ postconf -n
alias_database = hash:/usr/local/etc/postfix/aliases
alias_maps = hash:/usr/local/etc/postfix/aliases
allow_percent_hack = no
On 8-Mar-2009, at 19:22, Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Sun, Mar 08, 2009 at 07:19:32PM -0600, LuKreme wrote:
I don't have virtual_alias_domains defined at all, only
virtual_mailbox_maps:
This means that you do. See the default value. To really not have it
set, set it empty!
Is this a change
On 8-Mar-2009, at 19:29, Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Sun, Mar 08, 2009 at 07:24:54PM -0600, LuKreme wrote:
On 8-Mar-2009, at 19:22, Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Sun, Mar 08, 2009 at 07:19:32PM -0600, LuKreme wrote:
$ postmap -q southgaylord.com
mysql:/usr/local/etc/postfix
On 8-Mar-2009, at 19:39, Sahil Tandon wrote:
What happens if you set:
virtual_alias_domains =
in main.cf?
Then all mail to local (non virtual) users bounces with a Relay access
denied error.
--
Incredible! One of the worst performances of my career and they
never doubted
On 7-Mar-2009, at 08:11, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 3/7/2009, mouss (mo...@ml.netoyen.net) wrote:
if all extensions are acceptable (not very recommended),
Ok, this caught my attention...
Yes, I was planning on allowing any extension to be used/made up on
the
fly... thje purpose for using
On 7-Mar-2009, at 08:39, Noel Jones wrote:
Postfix does not allow $1 etc. substitution in virtual_mailbox_maps.
http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#virtual_mailbox_maps
It is pretty easy to set up a procmail transport to be used by postfix:
procmail unix - n n - -
On 7-Mar-2009, at 12:13, Charles Marcus wrote:
As I said in an earlier mail, I do NOT want the folder auto-created
- if
it doesn't exist, I want the message deliver to fall back to the
Inbox...
Is there a way to tweak the above to accomplish this?
Sure, you can do most anything in
On 6-Mar-2009, at 12:27, Charles Marcus wrote:
Hmmm... I'm now wondering if ${extension} can somehow be used with the
virtual_mailbox_maps query to accomplish what I want?
Yes, but you need procmail (or, I assume, Maildrop)
in a procmail file you would have:
# based on the procmail pipe in
On Mar 5, 2009, at 7:14, ghe g...@slsware.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Barney Desmond wrote:
This is a little unclear. I interpret that to mean mail sent from
your
server, from u...@a.com, should appear to come from u...@b.com, so
that the return-path will be at
On Mar 5, 2009, at 7:33, du...@linuxgeek.org.uk wrote:
Hi guys,
I have a couple of quick questions:
1) How long does a message sit in the postfix queue for before it
attempts
a redeliver (a deffered message sat in the deffered queue)?
2) If you have a mailserver (postfix, dovecot, virtual
On Mar 5, 2009, at 7:50, Terry Carmen te...@cnysupport.com wrote:
ram wrote:
One of my clients sends mail using a custom application which
*cannot*
recognize a smtpd error message .. like user-not-found, or
invalid-domain etc Now they want our postfix server to accept all
mails without
On 5-Mar-2009, at 11:03, Cameron Camp wrote:
ad...@domain.com (expanded from r...@localhost): host
mail.domain.com[1.2.3.4] said: 504 5.5.2 nob...@localhost:
Sender address rejected: need fully-qualified address (in reply to
RCPT TO command)
Is domain.com your attempt to obfuscate the
On 5-Mar-2009, at 19:15, Noel Jones wrote:
Oh, and recent postfix marks authenticated headers; note the
ESTMPSA. S = StartTLS, A = Authenticated
Received: from [192.168.5.108] (adsl-19-247-14.bna.bellsouth.net
[68.19.247.14])
by mgate2.vbhcs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id
On 4-Mar-2009, at 09:22, Wietse Venema wrote:
Charles Marcus:
Dovecot has added two lines of text to the beginning output of
dovecot
-n that could possibly save some time with troubleshooting...
It adds the version on the first line, and OS/platform info on the
second line, like so:
#
On 4-Mar-2009, at 11:54, Wietse Venema wrote:
postconf -n does not list parameters unless they are set in
main.cf. The simplicity of the tool makes it useful for building
into other tools. If we start making random exceptions then we get
on a slippery slope (why stop with mail_version? why not
What controls escaping From in the body of a mail message if it's
at the start of a line? Since I've switched everyone over to Maildir,
it seems silly to do this anymore, but I can't find the setting. In
fact, I'm not even sure it's in postfix at all.
RTFM replies preferred, just say
On 4-Mar-2009, at 12:33, Rob Tanner wrote:
X-Spam-Flag: YES
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.0 (2007-05-01) on
microthunder.com
They really *really* need to update their two-year old SA install.
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=4.4 required=4.0
They really *REALLY*
On 4-Mar-2009, at 13:08, J.P. Trosclair wrote:
submission inet n - - - - smtpd
-o smtpd_tls_security_level=encrypt
Why?
--
If I were you boys, I wouldn't talk or even think about women.
T'aint good for your health.
On 4-Mar-2009, at 13:32, Jim McIver wrote:
they just pile up in the postqueue and I'd like to keep the
postqueue -p cleaned out.
Snippet from maillog:
Mar 4 00:09:21 mail postfix/smtpd[36633]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT
from unknown[89.218.164.251]: 554 u...@domain.com: Sender address
On 4-Mar-2009, at 14:33, Jorey Bump wrote:
smtpd_tls_security_level should be used instead.
Not if you don't want to force TLS on the submission port it shouldn't.
On 4-Mar-2009, at 13:21, Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote:
*encrypt*
Mandatory TLS encryption: announce STARTTLS support to
when you have to=j...@example.net, orig_to=j...@example.com in
the maillog file, that translation is handled by /etc/postfix/virtual,
isn't it?
If j...@example.com is not in /etc/postfix/virtual, where else could
this be controlled?
I did grep -ir jo...@example.com /etc/postfix/ and got
On 4-Mar-2009, at 15:28, mouss wrote:
LuKreme a écrit :
What controls escaping From in the body of a mail message if
it's at
the start of a line? Since I've switched everyone over to Maildir, it
seems silly to do this anymore, but I can't find the setting. In
fact,
I'm not even sure it's
On 4-Mar-2009, at 15:18, Robert A. Ober wrote:
Thanks to Brian and others for hanging in there with me!
I think you owe everyone on this thread (which I was not part of, so
no self-interest) a beer. :)
--
#27794 Vellius ... I wonder if the really nerdy Klingons learn how
to speak
On 4-Mar-2009, at 19:12, Jorey Bump wrote:
LuKreme wrote, at 03/04/2009 05:24 PM:
On 4-Mar-2009, at 14:33, Jorey Bump wrote:
smtpd_tls_security_level should be used instead.
Not if you don't want to force TLS on the submission port it
shouldn't.
The context is irrelevant.
Of course
On 4-Mar-2009, at 17:13, Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 05:07:44PM -0700, LuKreme wrote:
If j...@example.com is not in /etc/postfix/virtual, where else
could this
be controlled?
See above. Consider also that the rewrite could be based on a partial
match of either the domain
On 4-Mar-2009, at 19:37, Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 07:26:34PM -0700, LuKreme wrote:
$ grep southgaylord.com /var/log/maillog| grep orig_to | grep john
| awk
'{print $7 $8}'
to=j...@covisp.net, orig_to=j...@southgaylord.com,
to=j...@covisp.net, orig_to=j
On 4-Mar-2009, at 20:29, Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 08:17:27PM -0700, LuKreme wrote:
On 4-Mar-2009, at 19:37, Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 07:26:34PM -0700, LuKreme wrote:
$ grep southgaylord.com /var/log/maillog| grep orig_to | grep
john | awk
On 4-Mar-2009, at 20:29, Victor Duchovni wrote:
Add -v to the cleanup(8) service to see where the change was made.
cleanup unix n - n - 0 cleanup -v
that REALLY broke things.
Lots of stuff, ending with:
Mar 4 20:58:22 mail postfix/cleanup[55873]: cleanup
The postfix docs say:
virtual_mailbox_limit (default: 5120)
The maximal size in bytes of an individual mailbox or maildir file,
or zero (no limit)
but since a maildir is a directory, does this limit apply to an
individual email (a file in the maildir) or to the directory size of
On 3-Mar-2009, at 11:48, Wietse Venema wrote:
host -t a 27a28250f4b7c74acc01d042687e2273.com
Perhaps they are using OpenDNS?
--
Hamburgers. The cornerstone of any nutritious breakfast.
On Mar 3, 2009, at 15:21, Charles Marcus cmar...@media-brokers.com
wrote:
On 3/3/2009 2:17 PM, LuKreme wrote:
host -t a 27a28250f4b7c74acc01d042687e2273.com
Perhaps they are using OpenDNS?
opendns works very well, as long as you disable the helper crap, so,
no,
has nothing to do
On 1-Mar-2009, at 18:55, Byung-Hee HWANG wrote:
Postfix does not support GNU TLS.
Postfix does not 'support' TLS at all. It should work with Gnu TLS as
well as with any other TLS library.
--
Beware of the Leopard!
On 27-Feb-2009, at 15:48, Charles Marcus wrote:
I'm sure this is something I'm totally missing but I have a system I'm
trying to get plus addressing working, and not having any luck. The
email is delivered, but just to the Inbox, not to the folder...
It is not postfix's job to deliver to the
On 25-Feb-2009, at 15:59, Voytek Eymont wrote:
[1]# grep hc2 *
header_checks:/^Content-(Disposition|Type):\s+.+?(file)?name=?.+?
\.com(\.\S{2,4})?(\?=)??(;|$)/
REJECT hc2 .com file attachment types not allowed
First off, i think you want mime_header_checks
main.cf:
mime_header_checks
On 25-Feb-2009, at 16:25, gianluca...@interfree.it wrote:
ok, i have configured postfix to sent mail trhough the smtp of my
internet service provider. Now one user have a certified email
account and he wants to sent mail by my server trhough the smtps.
I have seen that with postfix is
On 25-Feb-2009, at 16:31, LuKreme wrote:
/^\s*Content-(Disposition|Type).*name\s*=\s*?(.*\.(ade|adp|bas|bat|
chm|cmd|com|cpl|crt|dll|exe|hlp|hta|inf|ins|isp|js|jse|lnk|mdb|mde|
mdt|mdw|msc|msi|msp|mst|nws|ops|pcd|pif|prf|reg|scf|scr\??|sct|shb|
shs|shm|swf|vb[esx]?|vxd|wsc|wsf|wsh))(\?=)??\s
On 23-Dec-2008, at 17:06, Sahil Tandon wrote:
Linux Addict wrote:
Hello, I have clients sending mails to an non-existent email
address/domain, emailerm...@exchange.example.net. I want to discard
any
mail sent to this address. I looked at
smtpd_recipient_restrictions, but
cant figure out
On 23-Dec-2008, at 00:50, LuKreme wrote:
helo_checks.pcre:
/(dsl|pool|dynamic|user|hsd|dyn|dial)/ WARN helo Dynamic addresses
not allowed
Sorry, meant to include the check_client_fqdn.pcre, not the
(irrelevant) helo_checks
$ cat /etc/postfix/check_client_fqdn.pcre
/\.?(dhcp|dialup
On 23-Dec-2008, at 01:17, Magnus Bäck wrote:
The configuration as listed above will not greylist clients for which
$config_directory/pbs returns OK.
OK.
It hasn't happened since I properly turned on logging for pbs (of
course not, I'm watching it now) so I'm going to write it off to some
I have the following:
smtpd_restriction_classes = check_greylist
check_greylist = check_policy_service inet:127.0.0.1:10023
smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
reject_non_fqdn_sender,
reject_non_fqdn_recipient,
reject_unknown_sender_domain,
reject_invalid_hostname,
permit_mynetworks,
Won't that still break thunderbird? Or did mozilla finally fix that?
--
Sent from my iTouch
On Dec 7, 2008, at 14:41, Geert Hendrickx [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As well as your own IP, hostname and domain(s).
The iPhone and itouch are maniacal about forcing top posting.
--
Sent from my iTouch
On Dec 7, 2008, at 16:30, Sahil Tandon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Dec 07, 2008 at 04:24:48PM -0700, LuKreme wrote:
Won't that still break thunderbird? Or did mozilla finally fix that?
It won't
In looking for methods to install DKIM with postfix I am running into
some old info and some new info. It looks like the best way to handle
DKIM is using the plugin feature of postfix and use the sendmail
milters.
The other question is what do most people do with the check on the
DKIM
On 7-Dec-2008, at 18:50, Victor Duchovni wrote:
Do NOT use DKIM to reject unsigned mail or mail with a broken
signature.
If you don't intend to whitelist any DKIM senders, don't both
validating
DKIM signatuers, there is little point in doing so.
My main intent is to try to flag mails
On 3-Dec-2008, at 15:44, DJ Lucas wrote:
LuKreme wrote:
On 2-Dec-2008, at 20:21, DJ Lucas wrote:
I can find absolutely no reason to inadvertently mislead, or worse,
intentionally deceive the recipient by forging the envelope sender's
address. In fact, the only reason I can see
On 3-Dec-2008, at 16:53, mouss wrote:
DJ Lucas a écrit :
LuKreme wrote:
On 2-Dec-2008, at 20:21, DJ Lucas wrote:
I can find absolutely no reason to inadvertently mislead, or worse,
intentionally deceive the recipient by forging the envelope
sender's
address. In fact, the only reason I can
On 4-Dec-2008, at 08:18, Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote:
Add 'check_sender_access pcre:/path/to/config/
restrict_internal_domain'
to the end of smtpd_sender_restrictions
/path/to/config/restrict_internal_domain:
/.*\.example.com/REJECT external email with an internal sender
address
On 2-Dec-2008, at 20:21, DJ Lucas wrote:
I can find absolutely no reason to inadvertently mislead, or worse,
intentionally deceive the recipient by forging the envelope sender's
address. In fact, the only reason I can see, is to intentionally
deceive the recipient. Is there any other
On 21-Aug-2008, at 11:26, mouss wrote:
Erm... at least that was in postfix22, not sure if it's in 2.5.x
That's the third-party spf patch. It's still available in the ports.
I don't see it. must be an old ports tree?
# cd /usr/ports/mail/postfix; make config
On 28-Aug-2008, at 08:15, Stefan Palme wrote:
reject_rbl_client
reject_rbl_client zen.spamhaus.org
That's it, all you need.
--
Woof bloody woof.
501 - 600 of 602 matches
Mail list logo
