t an option.
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: Rossetti, Stan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2001 8:01 AM
> Subject: Load Balancing Across Multiple PIX
>
>
> > Hello Everyone,
> >
> > Does any
!
Of course if your using RIP this is not an option.
- Original Message -
From: Rossetti, Stan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2001 8:01 AM
Subject: Load Balancing Across Multiple PIX
> Hello Everyone,
>
> Does anybody know if i
Resources
> Network Operations Control Center
> Norfolk Naval Shipyard
> Bldg 33 NAVSEA NCOE
> 757-393-9526
> 1-800-626-6622
>
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, February 16, 2001 3:57 PM
>
-
From: Rossetti, Stan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2001 8:01 AM
Subject: Load Balancing Across Multiple PIX
> Hello Everyone,
>
> Does anybody know if it is possible to load balance across multiple PIX
> firewalls? I have looked at
val Shipyard
Bldg 33 NAVSEA NCOE
757-393-9526
1-800-626-6622
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 16, 2001 3:57 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; Rossetti, Stan
Subject: Re: Load Balancing Across Multiple PIX
Stan,
As pointe
Stan,
As pointed out by others, your best bet for load-balancing across
multiple PIX boxes is an external load-balancer ala local-director,
arrowpoint, foundry, etc.
However, in regards to throughput, Cisco claims 1Gbps cleartext
throughput on the new PIX 535. At that speed, its doubtful
AM
To: Rossetti, Stan; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Load Balancing Across Multiple PIX
They won't load balance natively. The problem with getting a load balancer
before the PIX is that you either have it on the inside balancing outbound
traffic or outside balancing inbound traffic. The P
You may need a combination of devices to get optimal load balancing,
and the solution may very well depend on the protocols involved. One
of the problems in our industry is to try to get a single box, with a
single processor, to do everything well.
It may be appropriate to treat the PIXen
;t think there's any easy way to do this...
- Original Message -
From: "Rossetti, Stan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2001 10:01 AM
Subject: Load Balancing Across Multiple PIX
> Hello Everyone,
>
> Does anybody kn
Does anyone have configuration examples of standby tracking and load
balancing between two Cat 5500's with a RSM?
Thanks
Wm. Spencer Plantier
LAN Engineer
(919) 474-1300 ext 0873 Office
(919) 474-1056 Fax
(919)696-8848 Cell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
FAQ,
Hello Everyone,
Does anybody know if it is possible to load balance across multiple PIX
firewalls? I have looked at numerous Cisco web pages, but never any mention
of load balancing. I have talked to a sales engineer and he has said that
to get 1GB of throughput from a PIX firewall, you need
Another thing to try if you don't have a large budget is load balancing on a
Linux box.
Check out:
http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/
>From: "Mark Holloway" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: "Mark Holloway" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTE
The "industry standard" at this point is the Foundry Server Iron. It has
the F5 load balancing software built into it. I've deployed the 8-port
10/100 and it works great. It costs approximately $10,000 which is almost
half the price of a Local Director. It provides load bal
Jim,
Load Balancing is not currently a feature of the PIX. This is what the Local
Director or the Content Switches are for.
Tim
"Jim Barksdale" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
I know using a Router and NAT you c
I know using a Router and NAT you can map a single external address to a
virtual host with an internal address, which then load balances across
several real hosts.
(TCP Load Balancing)
Can the same thing be done on a PIX?
I currently have 1 web server on the DMZ and want to add a second web
Check the archives for my earlier post regarding this topic. Inverse ATM
multiplexing (where available) seems to be a very good option. Frac T3 is
another option. Muxed T1 lines seem to be falling out of favor.
Craig
At 09:17 AM 2/28/2001 -0600, you wrote:
>You know I've never given this mu
this is helpful,
dave h
-Original Message-
From: Keith Townsend [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2001 10:18 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Multiplexing/Load balancing
You know I've never given this much thought I just assumed it was possible
to multiplex ser
You know I've never given this much thought I just assumed it was possible
to multiplex serveral T1 lines.
If I wanted a 10mb connection between to points and I had 6
individual T1 lines can I/do I multiplex the lines or do I have to load
balance between all six lines. The later doesn't make much
Original Message-
> From: John Neiberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2001 3:00 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: 2620 and load balancing
>
>
> True load balancing in this situation is actually pretty difficult to
&
default routes
> to
> >the routers.
> > My question is, can you run default-information
> >originate on two routers? And would that work in
> this
> >scenario?
>
>
> It's a good approach, at least for load-balancing
> your outgoing
> traffic. To have an
2620 and load balancing
True load balancing in this situation is actually pretty difficult to
achieve, especially if you're trying to balance incoming traffic.
Is this connection for incoming access to your services, or is it internet
access for internal users?
Since you're n
True load balancing in this situation is actually pretty difficult to achieve,
especially if you're trying to balance incoming traffic.
Is this connection for incoming access to your services, or is it internet access for
internal users?
Since you're not running BGP, and the
TED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2001 5:17 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: 2620 and load balancing
If I have two T1'S from different ISP'S and connect them to my 2620, How do
I load balance the traffic.Am I thinking of implementing BGP?. At the moment
I am just using 1 ISP and keeping th
If I have two T1'S from different ISP'S and connect them to my 2620, How do
I load balance the traffic.Am I thinking of implementing BGP?. At the moment
I am just using 1 ISP and keeping the other in standby.I would like to use
both together and load balance my traffic. We tried it with both TI'S
Running OSPF should work fine. That is how we do a majority of our load
balancing.
Only thing to make sure of is that if the circuit goes down your default
route goes away so you don't keep advertising it to the Cat5K.
- Original Message -
From: "Yonkerbonk" <[EM
remove HSRP totally and run OSPF
>so that the RSM sees two equal-cost default routes to
>the routers.
>My question is, can you run default-information
>originate on two routers? And would that work in this
>scenario?
It's a good approach, at least for load-balancing your ou
[MCI][Cat5K w/RSM][UUNet]
|
Internal LAN
I have a client with two Internet routers running
BGP multihomed to the ISPs, MCI and UUNET. Inbound
traffic to their AS is pretty much balanced between
MCI and UUNET. On the inside however, where MCI and
UUNET connect
Please find the relevant info
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/103/19.html
Regards
Arvind
> -Original Message-
> From: info [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, December 18, 2000 10:46 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: EIGRP and Unequal Cost Load Balancing
I want to learn as much as possible about unequal cost load
balancing in eigrp. Can anyone point me to a white paper or
book that goes into great depth on this topic?
I have a lot of site offices with PVCs to Headquarters and
Backup Headquarters. The link to HQ is typically twice
the size of the
Michael is correct. About the only thing you can do is set the STP
priorities on the ports differently for different VLANs, so that VLAN 10
traffic prefers Bplink A and VLAN 20 prefers uplink B. This would be a sort
of manual load balancing.
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Trunk Load Balancing
if all the ports on access layer switch is in the same VLAN, you can not
do that.
Spantree will only allow one path forwarding packets.
Michael Yu
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Alldread AK2 Robert J wrote:
> I would like some opinions on load balanc
if all the ports on access layer switch is in the same VLAN, you can not do that.
Spantree will only allow one path forwarding packets.
Michael Yu
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Alldread AK2 Robert J wrote:
> I would like some opinions on load balancing across (2) 6509 switches using
> trunk
mak wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I would like to know default is it OSPF already load-balancing?
> Is it only true that, suppose when 1 to 1 router WAN connection?
1 to 1 router with two WAN connections
>
> How about can I configure load-balancing when 2 to 2 routers WAN
>
Brian wrote:
> On Wed, 6 Dec 2000, mak wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I would like to know default is it OSPF already load-balancing?
>
> yes 4 equal cost paths by default.
>
> > Is it only true that, suppose when 1 to 1 router WAN connection?
>
> th
On 06-Dec-00 Brian wrote:
> On Wed, 6 Dec 2000, mak wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I would like to know default is it OSPF already load-balancing?
>
> yes 4 equal cost paths by default.
>
>> Is it only true that, suppose when 1 to 1 router WAN connection?
&g
On Wed, 6 Dec 2000, mak wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I would like to know default is it OSPF already load-balancing?
yes 4 equal cost paths by default.
> Is it only true that, suppose when 1 to 1 router WAN connection?
that sentence doesn't make any sense to me.
> How about
Hi all,
I would like to know default is it OSPF already load-balancing?
Is it only true that, suppose when 1 to 1 router WAN connection?
How about can I configure load-balancing when 2 to 2 routers WAN
connection?
Thanks
Regards,
mak
_
FAQ, list archives, and
tiple paths
you can get out of order packets).
Each vendor has different ways of forwarding across
equal paths. Theres per-packet, fast-switching
(building a cache based on src/dest hash), CEF, etc.
These have an effect how load balancing works as well.
On 3Com, they have 2 options for Equal
How effective is the load balance features of routing protocols (for
example, OSPF equal paths load balancing) when
compared to solutions such as F5 or Windows NT load balancing ?
_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list
)
> >
> >
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> > Shahir Boshra
> > Sent: Wednesday, November 22, 2000 3:29 AM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: Load-Balancing of two serial via
ad... you are absolutely right... :)
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> Shahir Boshra
> Sent: Wednesday, November 22, 2000 3:29 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Load-Balancing of two serial via s
virtual link between 2 ethernet interfaces. Thanks
for your help
Craig
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Shaw, Winston Mr.
Sent: Monday, November 27, 2000 2:26 PM
To: Craig Johnson; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: Virtual-link load
Interesting situation. It might be that the "virtual link" is like a tunnel
and gets a different "cost" although it is a T1 line. Have you already tried
cost adjustments ? to bring the other T1's to the same level as the virtual
T1. As long as they are equal in cost there
going from them to area 5. Unfortunately, all virtual-link traffic is
traversing over serial 0, and not load balancing across the other T1's.
Normal inter-area traffic is load balancing fine, but I have 1 T1 that
is heavily overloaded with the other 2 light. Any ideas?
__
My bad... you are absolutely right... :)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Shahir Boshra
Sent: Wednesday, November 22, 2000 3:29 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Load-Balancing of two serial via same ISP
Mostly right, except the
ndwidth, delay, etc...) this
> scenario of process-switching takes to most CPU utilization, so keep that
in
> mind... This will also only work for outbound connectivity... inbound
> load-balancing requires the use of an EGP, like BGP4...
>
> -Brant
>
>
> -Original Message
this
scenario of process-switching takes to most CPU utilization, so keep that in
mind... This will also only work for outbound connectivity... inbound
load-balancing requires the use of an EGP, like BGP4...
-Brant
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On B
"STATIC" config for
their customer, customer is only to
config "Default route". Consequently, I wanna use this two serial-line at
same time in "LOAD-BALANCING"
So, I wonder even though I make config for default route with new IP Address
whether no problem in LOAD-
BAL
ppp multilink is a way of packet load balancing (which is what I believe he
meant). Both sides must be configured for ppp multilink and it handles the
packet splitting and reassembly. Otherwise, you're just sending whole
packets through two or more paths of the same weight and the r
IL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2000 4:25 AM
Subject: BGP load balancing
> Hi all,
>
> I want to know that does command ebgp-multihop provide load balancing over
> ATM for a router, also how can I configure ebgp to control incoming
traffic
e:
>
> >ebgp multihop has nothing to do with load balancing traffic to and from
the
> >Internet, but it has everything to do with load balancing the the bgp
> >connection and update itself.
>
> I would say it may have something to do with this, but certainly not
everything
Couple comments/questions inserted
*** REPLY SEPARATOR ***
On 11/15/2000 at 2:14 AM Rodgers Moore wrote:
>ebgp multihop has nothing to do with load balancing traffic to and from the
>Internet, but it has everything to do with load balancing the the bgp
>connection a
ebgp multihop has nothing to do with load balancing traffic to and from the
Internet, but it has everything to do with load balancing the the bgp
connection and update itself.
If you have two parallel connections to the same router at your ISP and you
configure two neighbor statements to the
your providers to determine if that is a
possibility though.
--phil
On Wed, 15 Nov 2000, Andy wrote:
Hi all,
I want to know that does command ebgp-multihop provide load balancing over
ATM for a router, also how can I configure ebgp to control incoming traffic
from m
EBGP multihop has nothing to do with load balancing.
As for using BGP to control incoming traffic from your ISP, I would say
there is no simple answer here. You will need to do a lot of reading and
thinking.
Basssam Halabi, Internet Routing Architectures, is a good place to start.
www.nanog.org
Hi all,
I want to know that does command ebgp-multihop provide load balancing over
ATM for a router, also how can I configure ebgp to control incoming traffic
from my ISP
Regards
Andy
_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
At 03:19 PM 11/5/00, Gareth Hinton wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>I realise that this kit is fairly recent (Arrowpoint re-badge). Does anybody
>have any experience of using these load balancing boxes as an Authorative
>DNS?
>
>The idea is that the NS record points to this box. The box t
Hi all,
I realise that this kit is fairly recent (Arrowpoint re-badge). Does anybody
have any experience of using these load balancing boxes as an Authorative
DNS?
The idea is that the NS record points to this box. The box then load
balances by handing back the relevant IP address as the A
034@CHPTSE04">news:F387C9D3CA43D31190E80090278A758E514034@CHPTSE04...
> I would like some opinions on load balancing across (2) 6509 switches
using
> trunk ports.
>
> Here is the scenario...
>
> 1 switch at the access layer, 2 switches and the distribution layer. The
>
Title: RE: Trunk Load Balancing
I assume you mean for a single VLAN you want to do equal cost load balancing. I'm thinking you can't. I think about the best you can do is IF you have multiple VLAN's make one distribution switch the root of say all the odd VLAN'
I would like some opinions on load balancing across (2) 6509 switches using
trunk ports.
Here is the scenario...
1 switch at the access layer, 2 switches and the distribution layer. The
access layer switch has a GIG trunk link to each of the 2 dist layer
switches. How would I implement equal
BGP cannot load balance by default, taking into effect the bandwidth
parameter. However, ther is a good workaround for this.
have a look at this site, http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/459/21.html
It explains BGP load balancing very well
Geoffrey
"Brian" <> wrote i
On Thu, 26 Oct 2000, Doug Guth wrote:
> Can BGP really "load balance"? I have 2 ISP's with unequal pipes to them
> (one is 768k the other is full T1. It's a long story but that is what I have
> to work with for the forseeable future). I want to truely balance across
> the links. I know I can s
i have mistook to have send privious e-mail unfinished... sorry.
anyway, you need to take into consideration below.
are you using PA(Provider Agrigate) or PI(Provider Independent)
load balancing
outside -> inside traffic
inside -> outside traffic
and are you really need to use BGP ?
multihomig
redundant
load balancing
optimized routes
only
if you`re thinking about only load balancing
inside(lan) to outside(internet) traffic.
> Can BGP really "load balance"? I have 2 ISP's with unequal pipes to them
> (one is 768k the other is full T1. It'
>Can BGP really "load balance"? I have 2 ISP's with unequal pipes to them
>(one is 768k the other is full T1. It's a long story but that is what I have
>to work with for the forseeable future). I want to truely balance across
>the links. I know I can set the route maps and work with weight, loc
Can BGP really "load balance"? I have 2 ISP's with unequal pipes to them
(one is 768k the other is full T1. It's a long story but that is what I have
to work with for the forseeable future). I want to truely balance across
the links. I know I can set the route maps and work with weight, local
p
02D@CHPTSE04">news:F387C9D3CA43D31190E80090278A758E51402D@CHPTSE04...
> I would like some opinions on load balancing across (2) 6509 switches
using
> trunk ports.
>
> Here is the scenario...
>
> 1 switch at the access layer, 2 switches and the distribution layer. The
I would like some opinions on load balancing across (2) 6509 switches using
trunk ports.
Here is the scenario...
1 switch at the access layer, 2 switches and the distribution layer. The
access layer switch has a GIG trunk link to each of the 2 dist layer
switches. How would I implement equal
]> wrote:
> If it's a TCP-based session and per-packet load
> balancing gets the packets
> out of order, then TCP would put them back in order
> based on the TCP
> sequence numbers. This would happen at the end node,
> not at the router. If
> it were a UDP-based sess
If it's a TCP-based session and per-packet load balancing gets the packets
out of order, then TCP would put them back in order based on the TCP
sequence numbers. This would happen at the end node, not at the router. If
it were a UDP-based session, then an upper layer at the end node would
would ever see more than 1.5Mbps with
per-destination or per-session load-balancing. What I am saying is that
without per-packet, no "single" session or user can source more than
1.5Mbps.
> those cases, I occasionally got calls from managerial types that wanted
> to see symm
t; >
> > Brian
> >
> > On Fri, 13 Oct 2000, [iso-8859-1] Phil Barker wrote:
> >
> > > Hi groupies,
> > > Can anyone enlighten me on the process by which
> > > per-packet load-balancing re-as
F
>
> Brian
>
> On Fri, 13 Oct 2000, [iso-8859-1] Phil Barker wrote:
>
> > Hi groupies,
> > Can anyone enlighten me on the process by which
> > per-packet load-balancing re-assembles the packets at
> > the remote router. Which sequence nu
ies,
> Can anyone enlighten me on the process by which
> per-packet load-balancing re-assembles the packets at
> the remote router. Which sequence number is used e.g
> is it the TCP sequence number.
>
> Regards,
>
> Phil.
>
>
>
> __
Hi groupies,
Can anyone enlighten me on the process by which
per-packet load-balancing re-assembles the packets at
the remote router. Which sequence number is used e.g
is it the TCP sequence number.
Regards,
Phil.
Do You Yahoo
PVP's so if the
connection drops out, then itll re-establish around the other path.
That said you could do a form of load balancing using NHRP on a per
destination network basis I suspect, as it should create the connection
between routers using whatever route through the ATM network is opt
Hello Everyone
In the diagram below, supposing all the links are ATM's, is it possible to
rely on ATM to accomplish load balancing when the traffic goes from A to D,
i.e. load balance between B route & C route?
My understanding is that since ATM is connection-oriented, all the sessio
on
>than the current router", using your analogy, isn't that saying that you
>consider Kansas only when it's closer to Florida than Texas is, not when
you
>can't use Texas?
>
>Thanks
>Helena
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>The first condition is used in
; > would be computed as: p = 100/(2^n) where "p" is the percentage probability
> > (how many out of 100), "n" is the number of packets in the stream (ie, the
> > length). This doesn't take into account when the stream count is 0.
> >
> > Of course
that are in V1 whose computed cost to Network
7 equals Dmin (40). Router H meets this condition.
This is an explanation in the section on the topology database & what happens when a
route fails - if equal-cost load balancing & the route isn't the same cost, it
wouldn't be used, BUT i
The first condition is used in either unequal OR equal cost load balancing. It is to
prevent routing loops. Think of it like this: Let's say I'm going on vacation. I'm
in Arizona. I want to get to Florida. I can go thru Texas, which is my best route,
and there is a certai
Hi everyone,
CAn someone please explain the two feasibility conditions in EIGRP
unequal-cost load balancing?
They are:
- local best metric > best metric learned from the next router
- the "multiplier" x Local bestmetric for the destination > metric through
the next router
T
7;s my theory. Anyone have time to bench and test it?
>
> Rodgers Moore, CCDP, CCNP-Security
> Design and Security Consultant
> Data Processing Sciences, Corp.
>
> "luobin Yang" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTE
OTECTED]...
> Hi, group,
>
> I have question quite confused about. I learnt that per-packet
> load-balancing is used when process-switching is enabled and
> per-destination load-balancing is used when fast-switching is enabled.
>
> My question is, If there are two equal-cost
Hmmm, I think it is more likely to depend on the switching method of the
inbound interface then the outbound.
>
>Hi, group,
>
>I have question quite confused about. I learnt that per-packet
>load-balancing is used when process-switching is enabled and
>per-destination load
Hi, group,
I have question quite confused about. I learnt that per-packet
load-balancing is used when process-switching is enabled and
per-destination load-balancing is used when fast-switching is enabled.
My question is, If there are two equal-cost routes between RouterA and
RouterB, let'
I must disagree on nandit .
The first packet is always process switched and will
populate the arp cache . So , you will see entries in
the sh arp .
The remaining packets are fast-switched and you can
see the fast-cache using sh ip cache .
This fast-cache is build partly from the normal arp
cache
Hi,
As Erick says No-ip route cache will give no output when you do a show arp
and cache contents cannot be viewed.
The default setting is 4 hours if I am right
bye
nandit
"Erick B." wrote in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>
>Hi,
>
>On the interface config, you may have 'ip
>route-cache'. This is
Title: RE: Load balancing two T1 of two ISP
Ok..."request"
The
semantics of this are irrelevant...please don't waste our time with
them.
[Greene, Patrick]
-Original
Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2000 4:2
Title: RE: Load balancing two T1 of two ISP
I
believe that your statement...
"What this entails is you acquiring your own
Autonomous-System(AS) number from ARIN"
...Is incorrect as you do not
acquire an AS from ARIN.
-Original Message-From: Greene, Patrick
[mai
Title: RE: Load balancing two T1 of two ISP
Rayza,
The only way to truely load-balance this scenario is via BGP. What this entails is you acquiring your own Autonomous-System(AS) number from ARIN. Once you have your own AS you can then setup BGP on your routers going to your ISP's
Load balancing between two T-1 internet connections
from two different ISP on a LAN.
By this question I mean if there are two active internet connection
terminated on two different routers connecting to the LAN setting a
bandwidth threshold that when it passes that on the primary router
sends
We have 2 CAT5500 with 2 RSM modules. We have duplicate ATM PVC's coming
into each RSM. How or can we load balance and provide redundancy between
them running say HSRP/MHSRP?
___
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archiv
implement Load balancing between two T-1 internet connections
from two different ISP on a LAN.
By this question I mean if there are two active internet connection
terminated on two different routers connecting to the LAN setting a
bandwidth threshold that when it passes that on the primary router
sends
ECTED]'
Subject: EIGRP and Load Balancing
I have a network that is all part of an EIGRP community. 2 routers (using
hsrp internally) are direct connected to 2 other routers through 2 T1s.
Does EIGRP automatically load balance the 2 lines? Here is a (lousy
Diagram)
_10.1.1.2(
I have a network that is all part of an EIGRP community. 2 routers (using
hsrp internally) are direct connected to 2 other routers through 2 T1s.
Does EIGRP automatically load balance the 2 lines? Here is a (lousy
Diagram)
_10.1.1.2(E0) r3
192.168.253.1(s0)-
Awan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Agnelo D'souza
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Monday, August 28, 2000 11:04 AM
> Subject: Re: load balancing on Rip
>
>
> >
> >
> > its your route caching then, change the type you
> are using.
&g
switching or not... whether it load
balances on a packet per packet basis or on a session / destination basis.
-Original Message-
From: Nurarif Wibawa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 29 August 2000 15:32
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: load balancing on Rip
Hi,
I just wondering what the mea
Hi,
I just wondering what the meaning of unequal cost load balancing doesn't
work on RIP.
>From my experience, I have setup a router that has two paths to the same
destination with equal metric (hop count) and also I set different bandwidth
for each path with "bandwidth" comman
301 - 400 of 459 matches
Mail list logo
