Does anyone know what the expected release date is for 4.6?
Mike Burden
[cid:image002.gif@01CD4234.AA319080]
Lynk Systems, Inc
e-mail: m...@lynk.commailto:m...@lynk.com
Phone: 616-532-4985
inline: image001.jpginline: image002.gif___
sipx-users
Good morning,
I went to look something up in CDR this morning, and found that I only have
call detail from Jan 3rd and 4th.
I upgraded our PBX to 4.4.0 around the 3rd/4th by doing a fresh install on a
newly created VM and then importing configuration from the old server, so not
having any
[mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Tony Graziano
Sent: Monday, January 23, 2012 9:58 AM
To: Discussion list for users of sipXecs software
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Missing CDR?
did you ensure the cdr was running?
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 9:24 AM, Burden, Mike
m...@lynk.commailto:m
Guess I'll need to spend some more time reading the Ingate docs. :)
From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
[mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Tony Graziano
Sent: Friday, December 23, 2011 10:32 AM
To: Discussion list for users of sipXecs software
Subject:
him
help you.
On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 10:44 AM, Burden, Mike
m...@lynk.commailto:m...@lynk.com wrote:
Guess I'll need to spend some more time reading the Ingate docs. :)
inline: image001.jpginline: image002.gif___
sipx-users mailing list
sipx
Good afternoon,
I have a hunt group that includes 10 extensions. When the hunt group is
dialed (either directly from a local phone, or by dialing the DID Number that
is directed to this hunt group's extension), one of the extensions (which
happens to be C-SIP-Simple on Android) does not
Now that I re-read that JIRA and understand it, I think that would be
sufficient. I think the biggest problem is when the dial-by-name switches to
list mode after one keystroke, when the user is expecting to type at least two
or three.
I logged in and added my vote.
Mike Burden
Lynk
In a semi-related issue, in a very small company (like mine), it's annoying
that the dial-by-name switches from input to selection when it has narrowed the
field to three matches. In our office, that's half the company!
Is there a setting that controls this? If not, is it JIRA-worthy?
three extensions is worth at least one (if not
two, three, or more!) extra spelling keypresses, time-wise.
-Original Message-
From: Tony Graziano [mailto:tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net]
Sent: Friday, March 11, 2011 11:05 AM
To: Discussion list for users of sipXecs software
Cc: Burden, Mike
Sorry for jumping in late, but are you sure that Gary is included in a group
that has the List in Directory permission?
-Original Message-
From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
[mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Dan White
Sent: Thursday, February 03,
I have a DID number configured with forwarding to a Hunt Group. The
forwarding is set up as:
Always Enabled At the same time Forward to 99 (the hunt group) ring
for 999 seconds
The hunt group is set to ring all of our extensions simultaneously for 6000
seconds.
Despite this, the
Good afternoon,
SipXecs seems to chew up a lot of Max Forwards when bouncing the call from
the bridge to the proxy to the registrar, and then back and forth between the
proxy and the registrar while it resolves aliases. This sometimes leads to
too many hops, causing some inbound calls to
]
Lynk Systems, Inc
e-mail: m...@lynk.commailto:m...@lynk.com
Phone: 616-532-4985
From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
[mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Burden, Mike
Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 2010 3:08 PM
To: Discussion list for users of sipXecs software
From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
[mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Matt White
Have you tried setting the call forwards to the full name and not to extension
of the hunt group? If you have a hunt group called DID1 with an extension of
300, you want to
...@lynk.com
Phone: 616-532-4985
From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
[mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Burden, Mike
Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2010 12:39 PM
To: Discussion list for users of sipXecs software
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Incoming call bounces back
When I run a siptrace of an inbound call, I see that before an INVITE is sent
to any of our phones, the following sequence is repeated 11 times:
SipProxy SipRegistrar
|-- INVITE --|
|--- 100 TRYING -|
|--- 302 MOVED TEMPORARILY --|
From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
[mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Worley, Dale R
(Dale)
OTOH, 11 times for a single call is higher than would be expected, and may
indicate that your dial plans are arranged to put the call through too many
steps of
We've had a number of calls disconnect at exactly the two hour mark.
Running a trace, I found that the ITSP sent us an INFO, we returned a NOT
ALLOWED, and the ITSP responded with a BYE.
If I parse this right, it looks like the INFO was just informational to let us
know the call duration and
I'm looking at the Polycom Hardware Compatibility List
(http://wiki.sipfoundry.org/display/sipXecs/Polycom+Hardware+Compatibility+List)
If I read this right, sipXecs 4.2.x supports 3.2.3 firmware on Polycom IP650
phones, but not on Polycom IP550 phones?
I had thought that the IP650 and IP550
I'm looking at the Polycom Hardware Compatibility List
(http://wiki.sipfoundry.org/display/sipXecs/Polycom+Hardware+Compatibility+List)
If I read this right, sipXecs 4.2.x supports 3.2.3 firmware on Polycom IP650
phones, but not on Polycom IP550 phones?
I had thought that the IP650 and IP550
://downloads.polycom.com/voice/voip/sip_sw_releases_matrix.html
however 3.2.3 is broken, 3.3.x is very different and not supported from
sipxconfig yet. you have been forewarned.
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 9:32 AM, Burden, Mike
m...@lynk.commailto:m...@lynk.com wrote:
I'm looking at the Polycom
From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
[mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Michael Scheidell
Sent: Monday, November 29, 2010 9:39 AM
To: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Polycom Firmware levels
On 11/29/10 9:32 AM, Burden, Mike wrote:
I'm
Good morning,
Is there a way to route inbound calls based on the Caller ID from the inbound
call? I've been digging through the Wiki and through history of this
discussion group, but I'm coming up empty.
Two examples of how this might be useful would be routing calls from a Customer
to that
...@lynk.commailto:m...@lynk.com
Phone: 616-532-4985
From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
[mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Burden, Mike
Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 2010 11:58 AM
To: Discussion list for users of sipXecs software
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Software Update
I've *FINALLY* got the go-ahead to update our sipXecs system from 4.0.4 to
current.
When I go to System -- software Updates and click Check for Updates I get:
No software updates available
The package information was last updated Nov 24, 2010 11:40 AM.
The system is currently running
if there are any typos.
Log in by SSH.
cd /etc/yum.repos.d/
mkdir old
mv * old/
wget http://download.sipfoundry.org/pub/sipXecs/sipxecs-centos-stable.repo
yum clean all
yum update sipxecs
On 11/24/2010 10:46 AM, Burden, Mike wrote:
I've *FINALLY* got the go-ahead to update our sipXecs system from 4.0.4
Some calls are coming into sipXecs with a low number (5 of less, sometimes 3 or
less) hops remaining.
The ITSP says that the calls arrive at their switch that way.
Looking at the sipxtrace, it looks like the modular architecture of sipXecs
eats a lot of hops (ITSP to sipXbridge, sipXbridge to
...@ezuce.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 04, 2010 10:47 AM
To: Discussion list for users of sipXecs software
Cc: Burden, Mike
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Too many hops?
I don't think this is configurable now. However, I think this is a good point.
Why don't you create a jira feature request perhaps we can
-Original Message-
From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
[mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Worley, Dale R
(Dale)
Sent: Thursday, November 04, 2010 11:45 AM
To: Discussion list for users of sipXecs software
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Too many hops?
OK, the ITSP got a response from the soft-switch vendor:
We need to clarify some points in order to be sure that we're on the same
page.
As was previously mentioned by my colleague according to our official
documentation and the list of currently supported RFC (2327, 2543, 3261,
3262,
The ITSP has done a trace. The ITSP's soft-switch receives the re-INVITE,
notifies the billing system, and does NOT pass the re-INVITE along to the
up-stream provider.
The re-INVITE as received by the ITSP looked correct. I think I posted an
example somewhere along this thread. If not, I
Good morning,
I have an ITSP that is currently battling with a switch vendor on my behalf,
because when we transfer a call from extension to extension, we lose audio.
The switch vendor is pointing out that they are not getting a REFER from us.
This, of course, is because sipXbridge
From: Tony Graziano [mailto:tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net]
Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2010 11:37 AM
To: Burden, Mike
Cc: sipx-users
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] REFER vs INVITE for transfers
I don't know of a way to do that unless you use an independent SBC instead of
sipxbridge and tell it to allow
of
the URI in the To field.
Mike Burden
Lynk Systems, Inc
e-mail: m...@lynk.com
Phone: 616-532-4985
-Original Message-
From: Burden, Mike
Sent: Tuesday, August 24, 2010 8:31 AM
To: 'Tony Graziano'; sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
Subject: RE: [sipx-users] sipXecs registrar gives 404
, 2010 4:46 PM
To: Burden, Mike
Cc: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] DTMF Issues Revisited
Mike,
Did they say what header fields they thought were causing the trouble?
It sure looked like a 'normal' negotiation except for that weirdness
with the qualifier (limiting
Our ITSP created an account for us on a test server. Calls placed
through the test server fail with 404.
The ITSP says that it's because in the From field of the INVITE, we are
sending extens...@ouritsp.com (1...@ouritsp.com) instead of
use...@ouritsp.com (ly...@ouritsp.com)
I thought
That did it! Thanks!
Mike Burden
Lynk Systems, Inc
e-mail: m...@lynk.com
Phone: 616-532-4985
-Original Message-
From: M. Ranganathan [mailto:mra...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2010 5:03 PM
To: Burden, Mike
Cc: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
Subject: Re: [sipx-users
mailto:m...@lynk.com
Phone: 616-532-4985
From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
[mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Burden,
Mike
Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2010 10:39 AM
To: Eric Varsanyi; Tony Graziano
Cc: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
Subject: Re: [sipx
to the phonebook, so it's hard to get around #2 by entering them
on a case-by-case basis.
Mike Burden
Lynk Systems, Inc
e-mail: m...@lynk.com
Phone: 616-532-4985
From: Eric Varsanyi [mailto:sip...@eljv.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2010 7:04 PM
To: Burden, Mike
Cc: sipx
=44822, Time=3427730944
Mike Burden
Lynk Systems, Inc
e-mail: m...@lynk.com
Phone: 616-532-4985
-Original Message-
From: Scott Lawrence [mailto:scottlawr...@avaya.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2010 6:24 PM
To: Burden, Mike
Cc: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] DTMF
From: Tony Graziano [mailto:tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net]
Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2010 8:36 AM
To: Burden, Mike
Cc: Scott Lawrence; sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] DTMF Issues Revisited
A real siptrace of a call that DTMF did not work properly
...@list.sipfoundry.org
[mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Burden,
Mike
Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2010 9:27 AM
To: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] DTMF Issues Revisited
From: Tony Graziano [mailto:tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net]
Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2010
[mailto:sip...@eljv.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2010 10:35 AM
To: Tony Graziano
Cc: Burden, Mike; sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] DTMF Issues Revisited
I am somewhat doubtful that the DTMF setting are at issue here.
I say that because whether through
There are two types of caller ID, number only and name+number. Number
only caller ID is called Single Data Message Format (SDMF), which
provides the caller's telephone number, the date and time of the call.
Name+number caller ID is called Multiple Data Message Format (MDMF),
which in addition to
calls to my test targets just today, and only had a couple successes.
Mike Burden
Lynk Systems, Inc
e-mail: m...@lynk.com
Phone: 616-532-4985
From: John Lodden [mailto:j...@lodden.com]
Sent: Friday, March 05, 2010 3:40 PM
To: Burden, Mike
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] DTMF
Good afternoon,
Most of the time (about 75%) we can call a Customer/Vendor/etc that has
an automated attendant, and we are able to make selections or choose
extensions using DTMF on the keypad.
Once in a while, though, we make a call and are not able to make a
selection unless we wait
: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
[mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Burden,
Mike
Sent: Friday, March 05, 2010 3:27 PM
To: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
Subject: [sipx-users] DTMF Issues Revisited
Good afternoon,
Most of the time (about 75%) we can call
Good morning,
We are having a problem where calls that are one hold are dropped after one
minute.
I've put the sipxtrace on our FTP server at: ftp://ftp.lynk.com/losthold.xml
I'm not expert enough at reading them to pick out the root cause of the
problem. Can someone take a look?
Mike
...@lynk.com
Phone: 616-532-4985
-Original Message-
From: Dale Worley [mailto:dwor...@avaya.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 04, 2010 3:24 PM
To: Burden, Mike
Cc: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] On hold calls drop after one minute
On Thu, 2010-03-04 at 10:50 -0500, Burden
In case it helps, the phones are Polycom IP550.
Mike Burden
Lynk Systems, Inc
e-mail: m...@lynk.com
Phone: 616-532-4985
-Original Message-
From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
[mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Burden,
Mike
Sent: Thursday, March 04
days, then I guess it's solved!
Thanks!
Mike Burden
Lynk Systems, Inc
e-mail: m...@lynk.com
Phone: 616-532-4985
From: Tony Graziano [mailto:tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net]
Sent: Thursday, March 04, 2010 4:42 PM
To: Burden, Mike
Cc: Dale Worley; sipx-users
Could that be a configurable setting, so that it can be configured by
the Administrator?
That sounds like something were either way you set it, someone will want
the opposite...
Mike Burden
Lynk Systems, Inc
e-mail: m...@lynk.com
Phone: 616-532-4985
-Original Message-
From:
Agreed.
The advice I got was to create a user for each DID (I named mine DID001,
DID002, etc.)
For each user that represents a DID number, add the number to the
Aliases. I added the number three times in the alias field, once
with 7 digits (no area code), once as 10 digits (area code +
-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
[mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Burden,
Mike
Sent: Thursday, February 11, 2010 12:11 PM
To: Scott Lawrence
Cc: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Weird eyeBeam / NAT issue
Did you really expect anyone to try to use
Good afternoon,
I have a Polycom IP650 that is on the same subnet as the sipXecs server,
and a soft phone (either X-Lite or Bria - both exhibit the same
problem). Both are configured as extension 12.
The softphone is configure with my extension as the username, lynk.com
as the domain,
Thanks! I'll give that a try.
Mike Burden
Lynk Systems, Inc
e-mail: m...@lynk.com
Phone: 616-532-4985
-Original Message-
From: Tony Graziano [mailto:tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net]
Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2010 5:12 PM
To: Burden, Mike; sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
Subject: Re
That fixed it! Thanks!!
Mike Burden
Lynk Systems, Inc
e-mail: m...@lynk.com
Phone: 616-532-4985
-Original Message-
From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
[mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Burden,
Mike
Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2010 5:12 PM
To: Tony
to be for?
Why does that affect inbound calls and not extension-to-extension calls?
Mike Burden
Lynk Systems, Inc
e-mail: m...@lynk.com
Phone: 616-532-4985
-Original Message-
From: Tony Graziano [mailto:tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net]
Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2010 5:19 PM
To: Burden, Mike
Good morning,
First, a little topology:
Our sipXecs server is on a DMZ with the address 192.168.9.1/24. The
firewall address on that DMZ (which is also the default route for the
sipXecs server) is 192.168.9.254.
We have a workstation on the firewall's protected network with the
Did you really expect anyone to try to use that?
Wasn't expecting anyone to interpret the packet... I was mostly
checking to see if anyone could tell me whether or not what I described
is expected behavior on sipXec's part (if sipXecs is doing the right
thing, then there's nothing to debug!)
Reboots?! Yikes. If you go back to the old version of x-lite do
things
go back to normal?
Yes, it does. The really bizarre part is that Counterpath says that
both are based on the same codestack. It's possible that there's
something that's correct in my X-Lite config that's wrong in my
on
it.
Mike Burden
Lynk Systems, Inc
e-mail: m...@lynk.com
Phone: 616-532-4985
-Original Message-
From: Tony Graziano [mailto:tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net]
Sent: Thursday, February 11, 2010 12:54 PM
To: Burden, Mike; rj...@avaya.com; sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
Subject: Re: [sipx-users
The fact that Phone settings invisibly override Phone Group settings
has me tearing out my hair. It's the single issue with sipXecs that
causes me the most grief.
I have few enough phones that it's not TOO much hassle to document which
phone belongs to which user, delete all of them, and
What's the argument against MP3?
Mike Burden
Lynk Systems, Inc
e-mail: m...@lynk.com mailto:m...@lynk.com
Phone: 616-532-4985
From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
[mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Tony
Graziano
Sent: Thursday, January
I suppose Ogg Vorbis is out of the question?
Mike Burden
Lynk Systems, Inc
e-mail: m...@lynk.com
Phone: 616-532-4985
-Original Message-
From: Tony Graziano [mailto:tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net]
Sent: Thursday, January 07, 2010 10:09 AM
To: Burden, Mike
Cc: sipx-users
, January 04, 2010 10:05 AM
To: Josh Patten
Cc: Burden, Mike; sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Slightly off topic -- Headsets for Polycom
IP550
http://www.myitdepartment.net/content/view/48/70/
On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 9:52 AM, Josh Patten jpat...@co.brazos.tx.us
wrote
Thanks! I'll look into that.
Mike Burden
Lynk Systems, Inc
e-mail: m...@lynk.com
Phone: 616-532-4985
-Original Message-
From: Josh Patten [mailto:jpat...@co.brazos.tx.us]
Sent: Wednesday, December 30, 2009 12:10 PM
To: Burden, Mike
Cc: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
Subject: Re
From the CDR User Guide:
To configure CDRs, log in to the config server (sipXconfig) web UI as
superadmin. Open the
menu Calling, then Configuration, then Call Detail Records (CDRs).
You will see the
following settings:
In 4.0.4, I don't have a Calling menu. Is this documentation out
Good morning,
I'm using a Polycom IP550 phone and sipXecs 4.0.4-017289
2009-11-19T18:15:29 ecs-centos5.
My phone is registering properly, and I can make and receive calls with
no problem.
When I log into sipXecs with my extension number and PIN, click on
Phonebook, and click on a phone
] On Behalf Of Burden,
Mike
Sent: Monday, December 28, 2009 10:05 AM
To: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
Subject: [sipx-users] Click to Call
Good morning,
I'm using a Polycom IP550 phone and sipXecs 4.0.4-017289
2009-11-19T18:15:29 ecs-centos5.
My phone is registering properly, and I can make
The backup/restore won't work if the production system has a different
name or IP address than the test server.
I migrated our system by bringing the test server up on an isolated
network, and copying the configuration from the test server to the
production server screen-by-screen.
OK, I found this:
2009-12-28T15:00:38.63Z:497:JAVA:WARNING:ls-sip1.lynk.com:P1-13::RequestExceptionReporter:Unable
to process client request: Exception invoking listener method call of
component user_portal/UserPhonebookPage: Failure invoking listener method
'public void
Is the Developer's Forum the correct place to post enhancement
requests?
Besides searching for duplicate requests, is there any established
protocol for submitting enhancement requests?
Mike Burden
Lynk Systems, Inc
e-mail: m...@lynk.com mailto:m...@lynk.com
Phone: 616-532-4985
, Inc
e-mail: m...@lynk.com
Phone: 616-532-4985
-Original Message-
From: M. Ranganathan [mailto:mra...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, December 28, 2009 3:43 PM
To: Burden, Mike
Cc: Scott Lawrence; sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Click to Call
[...]
Do you have a space
[mailto:tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net]
Sent: Monday, December 28, 2009 4:10 PM
To: Burden, Mike
Cc: M. Ranganathan; sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Click to Call
It should ring your phone, and then dial the call for you.
On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 4:04 PM, Burden, Mike m
Er, sorry... it was Scott that said that earlier.
Mike Burden
Lynk Systems, Inc
e-mail: m...@lynk.com mailto:m...@lynk.com
Phone: 616-532-4985
From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
[mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Burden,
Mike
Sent
-4985
From: Todd Hodgen [mailto:thod...@verizon.net]
Sent: Monday, December 28, 2009 4:28 PM
To: Burden, Mike; 'Tony Graziano'
Cc: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
Subject: RE: [sipx-users] Click to Call
I'd start by looking at that import file to see if there are any other
trailing
OK, so now it works with no punctuation in the number, but not if I add
the punctuation back in, either as
(XXX)XXX- or XXX-XXX- format.
I don't really see a way to use the dialing rules to get around the
problem.
It would be nice if the phone numbers would display with
I needed to change the name / IP address of my server, so I rebuilt my
configuration by hand.
The problem is that I've lost the password to my primary gateway ITSP
account. I've put in a call to get someone to call me back so we can
reset it, but I'm getting impatient.
I've poked around
.
Mike Burden
Lynk Systems, Inc
e-mail: m...@lynk.com mailto:m...@lynk.com
Phone: 616-532-4985
From: M. Ranganathan [mailto:mra...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, December 18, 2009 10:50 PM
To: Burden, Mike
Cc: sipx-users
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] One way audio
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009
Good morning,
I deleted all of my phones and re-discovered them in order to undo any
individual configuration and make sure that all of my phones were
configured using the settings in the Phone Group.
All of the phones are Polycom IP550, and I have double checked that they
are all part of
Twice in the past few weeks we have had calls where the audio suddenly
went one way.
The first time it happened, it was about 30 minutes into the call. It
happened again today, about 5 minutes into the call.
The sipXtrace looks normal:
Time: 2009-12-18T15:51:44.184000Z sipXbridge -
: 616-532-4985
From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
[mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Burden,
Mike
Sent: Friday, December 18, 2009 11:52 AM
To: sipx-users
Subject: [sipx-users] One way audio
Twice in the past few weeks we have had calls where the audio
Systems, Inc
e-mail: m...@lynk.com
Phone: 616-532-4985
-Original Message-
From: M. Ranganathan [mailto:mra...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 10, 2009 6:33 PM
To: Burden, Mike
Cc: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] CDR Report / Trunk Hunt oddity?
On Thu, Dec
-Original Message-
From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
[mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Damian Krzeminski
Sent: Thursday, December 10, 2009 11:15 AM
To: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Phone Book Import
Burden, Mike wrote
Import
Burden, Mike wrote:
Naming the file Customers.csv and attempting to import it gives me
the
error message, and the attached log file entries.
Doing *NOTHING* except renaming the file to Phonebook.csv allows me
to
import it with no errors.
It's worth noting that there *IS* no column
I have a Trunk Hunt group set up at extension 99 that rings all of our
hard phones simultaneously.
The destination for inbound calls is set up as 99 in the sipXbridge.
The CDR report shows all inbound calls as having failed, even though
all of the calls were answered.
Is my configuration
Systems, Inc
e-mail: m...@lynk.com
Phone: 616-532-4985
From: Tony Graziano [mailto:tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net]
Sent: Monday, December 07, 2009 4:30 PM
To: Burden, Mike
Cc: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] How to set up a non-NAT'd sipXecs IP PBX
without giving
To: Burden, Mike; sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
Subject: RE: [sipx-users] How to set up a non-NAT'd sipXecs IP PBX
withoutgiving public addresses to the phones
If the Server is on a Public Address, and the phones are on NAT
addresses,
how would they get to server without going through a router to get
+--+
Mike Burden
Lynk Systems, Inc
e-mail: m...@lynk.com
Phone: 616-532-4985
-Original Message-
From: Todd Hodgen [mailto:thod...@verizon.net]
Sent: Monday, December 07, 2009 4:35 PM
To: Burden, Mike; sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
Subject: RE: [sipx-users] How to set up a non
In the installer, if more than one disk is detected, force
manual-format instead of just formatting all the disks that it finds.
Please don't ask me why I'm requesting this (it has *NOT* been a good
morning!)
Mike Burden
Lynk Systems, Inc
e-mail: m...@lynk.com
Phone:
Tony Graziano Wrote:
The server, with a public IP address and no firewall, is a bad BAD idea.
I wouldn't do that, no matter who I was.
The sipXecs server will not be behind NAT, but it WILL be behind a
firewall (see below.)
Todd Hodgen Wrote:
If the Server is on a Public
Lawrence [mailto:scott.lawre...@nortel.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2009 1:32 PM
To: Burden, Mike
Cc: Sipx-users list
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Request for the next release
On Tue, 2009-12-08 at 12:20 -0500, Burden, Mike wrote:
In the installer, if more than one disk is detected, force
manual
-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
[mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Burden,
Mike
Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2009 3:55 PM
To: Sipx-users list
Subject: [sipx-users] Migrating Virtual to Physical -- what did I miss?
After some of the suggestions made on this list, we decided
Yes, same hostname, network domain, and SIP domain.
Mike Burden
Lynk Systems, Inc
e-mail: m...@lynk.com
Phone: 616-532-4985
-Original Message-
From: Scott Lawrence [mailto:scott.lawre...@nortel.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2009 4:05 PM
To: Burden, Mike
Cc: Sipx-users list
?
Yes, same hostname, network domain, and SIP domain.
Mike Burden
Lynk Systems, Inc
e-mail: m...@lynk.com
Phone: 616-532-4985
-Original Message-
From: Scott Lawrence [mailto:scott.lawre...@nortel.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2009 4:05 PM
To: Burden, Mike
Cc: Sipx-users list
...)
Mike Burden
Lynk Systems, Inc
e-mail: m...@lynk.com
Phone: 616-532-4985
From: Josh Patten [mailto:jpat...@co.brazos.tx.us]
Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2009 4:09 PM
To: Burden, Mike; sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Request for the next release
LOL
...@nortel.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2009 4:34 PM
To: Burden, Mike
Cc: Sipx-users list
Subject: RE: [sipx-users] Request for the next release
On Tue, 2009-12-08 at 15:49 -0500, Burden, Mike wrote:
I'm not saying that you should leave extra disks on the system that
might confuse things later
...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Burden,
Mike
Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2009 4:14 PM
To: Tony Graziano; scott.lawre...@nortel.com
Cc: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Migrating Virtual to Physical -- what did I
miss?
I did load from the 4.0.4 ISO.
Thanks for the heads up
Are the yum repos that are installed by the sipXecs 4.0.4 install ISO
correct?
I'm getting 404'd by everything when I try to yum install wireshark
or even just yum update
I had wireshark installed on the virtual sipXecs server, and I don't
remember doing anything different there, but the
1 - 100 of 138 matches
Mail list logo
