I've been hearing more and more about spam filters that are too
"agressive". Calling may be the best thing to do.
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 12:37 AM, Scottie Arnett wrote:
> In my area, I have to deal with northstarstudios.tv.
>
> I have sent emails after emails to them.I guess next is call them
>
y also use licensed frequency
> which they pay a premium for.
>
> On 11/28/2011 04:51 PM, Rich _ wrote:
>
> What type of equipment does Clear/OpenRange use that allows a connection
> using one of those 1"x3" USB things?
>
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 7:43 PM, J
Then, most WISP operations use unlicensed freqencies?
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 7:59 PM, Matt Jenkins wrote:
> **
> Proprietary equipment in most cases. They also use licensed frequency
> which they pay a premium for.
>
> On 11/28/2011 04:51 PM, Rich _ wrote:
>
> What type of
700MHz). The equipment cost is expensive
> as well with base stations in the tens of thousands of dollars and I'm
> sure the dongles are probably in the $100-200/unit range as well.
>
>
> Rich _ wrote:
> > How do the companies that have a dongle do it? Are they using
>
ffice: 937-552-2340
> Direct: 937-552-2343
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373
> On Nov 28, 2011 7:40 PM, "Rich _" wrote:
>
>> How do the companies that have a dongle do it? Are they using something
>> other than a WISP?
>>
>>
>&
How do the companies that have a dongle do it? Are they using something
other than a WISP?
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 8:02 PM, Sam Tetherow wrote:
> Rich,
> Given current gear, FCC regulations and available spectrum, outside of
> reselling cellular you are not going to going to find any
What does "a pure fixed wireless" mean?
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 7:11 PM, Doug Clark wrote:
> Rich,
> Take a look at the failing business model of Clear. They have their own
> licensed spectrum and in my area they spent
> close to 140 million dollars on build out.
technical contractor/employee would be needed. I hope available
equipment is quite stable and reliable?
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 6:44 PM, Faisal Imtiaz wrote:
> Hi Rich,
> WISPA General List is actually a Global List.
> It would go a long ways for relevant folks to reply back to you if y
termine if this is a good opportunity for me.
Thanks,
Rich
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
WISPA Wireless
Loved the image. What really amazes me is that you can mail to anywhere in the
galaxy for a mere 41 cent first class postage.
Rich
- Original Message -
From: Mike Hammett
To: WISPA General List
Sent: Monday, June 18, 2007 1:42 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] [OT] The USPS never
te, but I'm
very surprised that any state would apply this law to a public computer
network like the Internet that's actually INTENDED for public use. If the
Michigan felony law is not specific to government networks I think it should
be changed. I think it's wrong for a 5yr fel
http://www.netburnerstore.com/embedded_ethernet_development_p/nndk-mod5270lc-kit.htm
$99 includes core module, development board, ac adapter, ethernet cable,
crossover cable, serial cable, and software (including a collection of
canned applications). Lowest priced hardware I've seen.
- Or
We ran Skype from our windows phones. Why? Just to see if it'd work as an
internet app! :-) Worked fine.
Rich
- Original Message -
From: "Mike Hammett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Friday, May 11, 2007 7:38 AM
Subject: Re:
eam recording. (to show he teenage driver when/how fast she was
really driving)
I would think that these things could all be incorporated for under $2k,
mounted in the trunk, and it would be something that would sell like crazy
for $3k installed.
I guess what I would like is a retail version of this
ervice to your
cellphone. I love ppc6700 windows phones ... a lot lighter and smaller than
a laptop yet nearly as capable.
Rich
- Original Message -
From: "Mike Hammett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2007 8:08 AM
Subj
ken the link, the title is "How Open Source Projects Survive Poisonous
People (And You Can Too)." Doesn't have to be an Open Source Project for it
to be applicable. You don't have to view it all ... but everyone should at
minimum view the section on list-server behavior. I
n be provided with IP
network technology. But most all the plans I participated in (remember, my
participation was in the 1990s) was solution neutral ... how it was to be
provided was not mandated. Except for interoperability for voice
communications ... back in the 90s the recommendations were quit
band communications plans are absurd and can't possibly work.
Why would you jump out and slam a field that you know nothing about? Yet
you wonder where people get the notion from that you're anti-gov. Why not
just say "excuse me" on that one and we'll move on.
Rich
ess themselves well (you certainly do).
I guess I just enjoy your discussion!:-) I'd happily discuss anything
on the topic off-list as I feel as strongly about it as you seem to.
best regards,
Rich
- Original Message -----
From: "Mark Koskenmaki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&
it was my paid full-time job to participate in
whatever industry forum or government committee they saw fit. It's really
tough when it's your own time, expense, & motivation.
Rich
- Original Message -
From: "Jack Unger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISP
ardly ever equates to "burn it all down." Can you
really find no redeeming qualities in anything expressed thru your
government?
Respectfully,
Rich
- Original Message -
From: "Mark Koskenmaki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Wed
- Original Message -
From: "Mark Koskenmaki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2007 1:08 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Open Meeting on 700 MHz
- Original Message -
From: "Jack Unger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Wedne
CB. There's a terrible
need for active FCC watch-dogs to weigh-in to counteract the impact of paid
lobbyists. Of course, the major industries have a voice that's orders of
magnitude louder. But that's the way it's always been.
Rich
- Original Message -
From: Jack
al role to perform. I just wish they would do better
where I think they bear a responsibility, and abandon meddling where I think
they shouldn't have ever interfered.
Rich
- Original Message -
From: Rick Harnish
To: 'WISPA General List'
Sent: Saturday, April 21,
ndset
support for VoIP customers.
http://www.networkworld.com/news/2007/041007-verizon-patents-vonage.html?t51hb&company=
Rich
--
WISPA Wireless List: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Saw this in "Network World" and thought of the recent WalMart RFID thread on
this list. Enjoy.
Rich
-
Wal-Mart and the Three Great RFID Lies
by Yankee Ingenuity, Howard Anderson
The Three Great Lies used to be: My wife doesn&#x
the big
players (both manufacturers and operators) religiously protect their IPR, and
if you want to compete (meaning: grow large) you better pay attention.
Vonage's crime was complete total ignorance of the law of IPR (which we all
know is always a very poor legal defense for breaking the law
lly simply uninstalling the interfering
program returns windows operation to normal. Had this happen to me, and it was
as simple as uninstalling a paint program (Micrografix picture publisher 10)
... but figuring out that this application had a conflict was the hard part.
Rich
- Origin
s 1/10th of the bandwidth are not made to be displayed on a
42" HD monitor, he's correct ... but Slingbox, LocationFree, and BeyondTV
compressed recordings look just fine to me (about the same as analog cable
looked).
Rich
- Original Message -
From: George Rogato
To:
ite nicely on much much less BW. Is IPTV
really that much of a hog that it needs 1.25Mbps? How could it possibly
compete against products out there already that use only a tenth of this BW?
Rich
- Original Message -
From: George Rogato
To: WISPA General List
Sent: Monday, M
>What patents did Vonage infringe upon. What does Verizon have a patter on
>concerning voip ...
Many thanks to Peter, who supplied all the specifics of the patents in
question. Interesting reading.
> ... and how does that effect the future?
I read the public announcement from Vonage issued t
ct just for interests sake. Do you need a separate
email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] as your post reads?
Rich
- Original Message -
From: Peter R.
To: WISPA General List
Sent: Friday, March 23, 2007 9:48 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Vonage
I tracked down the patents and the verdic
urt actions? That would surely list the patent numbers at issue.
Rich
- Original Message -
From: George Rogato
To: WISPA General List
Sent: Friday, March 23, 2007 5:50 PM
Subject: [WISPA] Vonage
What patents did Vonage infringe upon.
What does Verizon have a patter on concern
Is this what DECT is
using? Did they pay the fees? I am trying to understand all the issues
being discussed here and feel I am missing important facts.
Thank you,
Scriv
Rich Comroe wrote:
>Did you look at the UTAM URL? The fee until recently was $20 per
device
?
I used to work for a very, very, very large US manufacturer, and all UL
business phone development in 1.9GHz have long ago (years ago) been permenantly
cancelled to my best knowledge.
Rich
- Original Message -
From: John Scrivner
To: WISPA General List
Sent: Thursday, Mar
mere 50 cents per radio, but a
manufacturer must still pay UTAM $50,000 up front. With the lack of products,
UTAM has amassed a huge debt.
The FCC groundrules for clearing the Pt-Pt users from the band were more than
enough to insure that this UL band would never be effectively utilized in
to each other right where you are
crossing. Am I seeing things?
Rich
- Original Message -
From: Bob Moldashel
To: WISPA General List
Sent: Sunday, March 11, 2007 12:45 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] tower climbing
Looks like someone was not paying attention when they installed it
is simply wondering if
others have noticed "known problems" with SNMP polling of APs. Canopy may have
some issue, which could be significant to a wisp if he's become reliant upon
network performance monitoring (which is a good thing IMO).
Rich
- Original Message -
Fr
mbers. And if you
think this is "evolutionary" from GSM/GPRS -> WCDMA I don't know what to tell
you. I tried to point out the jump in technology that they are bridging in the
last post, and to me it's completely "revolutionary."
regards,
Rich
p.s. I have to
the US on the front edge.
>It's always interesting...
Hey, I love this ... it's been near and dear to my heart through about 30 yrs
in the industry (I spent almost 10 yrs of it in standards group participation).
I don't know how others on the list think of the topic. If we
that the wisps would collectively have benefitted were
some minimum media access procedures common across all these devices.
Anyways, I appreciate your thoughts and enjoy comparing differing opinions.
peace,
Rich
- Original Message -
From: wispa
To: WISPA General List
Sent: Frida
ion cellular licensing process where they became infatuated with how
much the auctions could net monetarily ... if they simply allowed the winner to
deploy whatever technology they felt like. The airways belong to the American
people. It's my government, and I wished they acted in
ion of building. It happens. You likely never heard of a product called
DSRR either (digital short range radio) which was allocated but intentionally
torpedoed by manufacturers lobbying for standards that they knowingly never
intended to build to.
Rich
- Original Message -
From: w
AM from customer cpe (within the
typically lower upstream cap).
Rich
- Original Message -
From: David E. Smith
To: WISPA General List
Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2007 7:36 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Anyone Seen AppleTV yet ?
Rick Smith wrote:
> Wonder what kinda ban
DOT is ***supposed*** to switch to DSRC for this. DSRC was allocated 75MHz at
5.9Ghz just above the U-NII band based on roadway & highway needs such as this
DOT application. I participated in DSRC formulation enough to know that DOT
had been experimenting with UL for years for highway signage
Amen, and well said. There is a lot that an industry org can do in this
respect. I'm familiar with APCO and find many similarities. (key: APCO =
Association of Publicsafety Communications Officials ... www.apcointl.org)
Here's some examples.
1.. Speak for the industry to the FCC. APCO's
th. However, I find the PPC6700
big display & slide-out keyboard sufficient for daily use.
Thanks to you David for the clue that there was a windows mobile version of
Slingbox player. Didn't know that. Loaded it up and it's great!
Rich
- Original Message -
Fr
eater than the inbound bw anyway. So it now looks prudent to me to
have BOTH bw management built into the radios, AND at the head-end.
Rich
- Original Message -
From: Jason
To: WISPA General List
Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2007 2:31 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Advanced Bandwi
affic is ultimately limited or
not.
Anyways, I'm getting a great deal from the discussion, and would love to hear
if other radios have built-in bw management and what method is use for
comparison (any Trango users who could possibly comment?).
Rich
From: Ryan Langseth
To: WISPA Ge
bucket allows a certain amount of
burstiness while imposing a limit on the average data transmission rate.
I can't say I understand the difference yet, but I'm motivated. Does anyone
else understand or know how to explain the difference?
Rich
- Original Message -
From:
will share what bw
management algorithms they may have built-in.
thanks again,
Rich
- Original Message -
From: Patrick Leary
To: WISPA General List
Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2007 6:23 PM
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Advanced Bandwidth Management
Rich,
--- Here is the detail
whereas
each simply defines a set of the 4 leaky bucket parameters.
Not only is bw management critical IMHO to wisp operators, but also
interesting. I'd love to know enough of the different techniques in use to
contrast them by behavior or application. Maybe just some URLs whereby I could
ey only sell business
service where throughput per user is sold with SLAs ... engineering to a high
erlang per user, or equivalently described as a low oversubscription rate).
regards,
Rich
- Original Message -
From: Matt Liotta
To: WISPA General List
Sent: Wednesday, January 2
icrosoft
windows mobile 5 would permit any phone with a pc wireless interface to do this.
Rich
- Original Message -
From: Frank
To: 'WISPA General List'
Sent: Monday, January 22, 2007 11:13 PM
Subject: RE: [WISPA] SmartPhone Happiness...
I have the T-Mobile versio
e platform for 2 whole years and NOBODY stepped up
for developing applications ... so Moto abandonned it switching to Windows to
launch the Q phone. I think it casts doubt whether the market really wanted a
Linux platform phone. I mean, when you offer a supported Linux product and
nobody gives a h
prioritization mechanism (such as embodied in VL) is far superior to
pre-allocated partitions in so, so many ways.
Rich
- Original Message -
From: Patrick Leary
To: WISPA General List
Sent: Monday, January 08, 2007 6:57 PM
Subject: RE: [WISPA] churn,double play and w
pics I have just commented on! :-)
They are just my ignorant opinions, and I'd greatly appreciate anyone who could
kick some sense into me should I be all wet.
Peace,
Rich
- Original Message -
From: Marlon K. Schafer (509) 982-2181
To: WISPA General List
Sent: Friday, Dec
een FCC type accepted. If not ... why is it
illegal?
Rich
- Original Message -
From: Tom DeReggi
To: WISPA General List
Sent: Friday, December 29, 2006 9:44 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] StarOS or Microtik with TRCPQ clients...
Lonnie,
Patrick has a valid point. Truthfully,
>Where's the disagreement Rich. I said the WiMAX MAC was not ready for UL
I hear you. My disagreement is that a UL wisp standard SHOULD have been ready
YEARS ago.
HiperMAN is different than HiperLAN/2 (I incorrectly called it HyperLAN2 in the
previous posts). You say the spec for UL
manufacturer field any HyperLAN2 products (or prototypes)
which could be trialed in US 5GHz UNII band? Sigh...
Rich
- Original Message -
From: Patrick Leary
To: WISPA General List
Sent: Thursday, December 28, 2006 8:41 PM
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Alvarion Comnet Radios have arrived
product that Patrick is
describing. I'm sure there's other brands also available now as well. Maybe
it meant no product "like it" yet available in UL 900 / 2.4 / 5??? Dunno. A
little help please?
Rich
- Original Message -
From: Patrick Leary
To: WIS
uld very well be all wet, as I am only
talking from what I've picked up from reading here ... and I've not had any
first-hand experience with real available pre-WiMAX gear that's out there.
Alvarion's got pre-WiMAX gear ... maybe Patrick can confirm, or alternative
advance if I've got this wrong. I'm a great fan of
time framed systems myself.
>It would be interesting to see how a bare OFDM TDD system
>would have performed?
I think you'll get your wish. Isn't this what WiMAX is?
Rich
- Original Message -
From: Tom
-away weaker signals from screwing up your channel
access if you were using something like CSMA.
Rich
- Original Message -
From: Charles Wu
To: 'WISPA General List'
Sent: Thursday, December 28, 2006 3:47 PM
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Alvarion Comnet Radios have arrived -
are "off" that 1GByte list.
Rich
- Original Message -
From: Jonathan Schmidt
To: 'WISPA General List'
Sent: Wednesday, December 27, 2006 11:37 AM
Subject: RE: [WISPA] bits per mbps
True, Matt, often a better way.
Now, what to do with P2P abus
at some product will guarantee business class services
in interference and another won't is tiresome, and just turns people off from
the good content that people appreciate.
Rich
- Original Message -
From: Brad Belton
To: 'WISPA General List'
Sent: Tuesday, De
y
>getting a call saying they are getting something less than that.
If you have no allowance for even temporary interference, what short of a
licensed channel can accomplish that?
Rich
- Original Message -
From: Brad Belton
To: 'WISPA General List'
Sent: Tuesday, De
. typical big company syndrome
IIRC).
Rich
- Original Message -
From: "Charles Wu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'WISPA General List'"
Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2006 9:06 AM
Subject: [WISPA] Old News -- but can someone patent a "mesh network&qu
What part did you play in setting up this new standard, Rich?
I personally advocated DSRC be a different technology than wifi, and that
this was desirable to keep usage separate. What can I say? I worked for
Motorola at the time, and we proposed Canopy! I left the activity when the
cussion of control
channels). As such there's a sensitivity of DSRC members that dual-band
units not be able to operate using standard 802.11 MAC on the DSRC channels
which could put the dedicated DSRC safety functions at risk.
Rich
- Original Message -
From: "John Scrivner&qu
romote unlicensed wifi outdoors in the 5.8 UNII band via
dual-band usage may be more troubling to wisps than bleed-over from DSRC
band usage.
Rich
- Original Message -
From: "John Scrivner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Thursday, November
f cake ... no harder than opening a web page
and scrolling to spot the offenders.
Rich
- Original Message -
From: "Eric Merkel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Friday, October 27, 2006 3:11 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] "The Gremlin," red
k from the outside, but were broadcast
storms between 2 or more customers (repeated through the APs). They act
similar to the symptoms you cited (a few minutes of extremely elevated
latency due to the short term load they place over the rf).
Rich
- Original Message -
From: "Eric
NexTel's new developments are targeted
to other bands in conjunction with Sprint.
chill,
Rich
- Original Message -
From: "rwf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'WISPA General List'"
Sent: Friday, October 27, 2006 2:24 AM
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Sprint / Next
and limits.
But there are IIRC 15MHz of 25KHz channels that they hold licenses among at
800 (and the separate reverse channels 45MHz higher), and only 4MHz of
12.5KHz channels at 900 (including both T&R, but I don't recall the T/R
split there).
Rich
- Original Message -
F
;s no secret where their new technology is targeted (WiMAX).
Rich
- Original Message -
From: "John Scrivner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2006 9:29 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Sprint / Nextel to use 900mz for iDen
I
Isn't it the WiMAX "mobility" opportunity? Wasn't the original 802.16 specs
completely rewritten to add the opportunity for mobility?
Rich
- Original Message -
From: "Sam Tetherow" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "WISPA Gen
on
interference and hear "we haven't changed anything in months." Hence our
nightly testing for interference changes.
Rich
- Original Message -
From: "Mike Bushard, Jr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'WISPA General List'"
Sent: Monday, Sep
We got one of the Hawking Hi-Gain USB Wireless-G Dish Adapter just today.
Has a 5-led signal strength display. Great fun. It's dish antenna is
built-in but they may have one with an external antenna connection too.
Rich
- Original Message -
From: "David E. Smith" &l
and their
technology).
All in all I don't consider Matt's idea hair-brained at all, but merely a
return to a more rational time when the FCC's mandate was to simply serve
the nation's spectrum needs (rather than serving the Treasury Dept).
Rich
- Original Message -
anaging spectrum for the benefit of the
American people, not managing spectrum to maximize government revenue. But
that's just me.
Rich
- Original Message -
From: "Marlon K. Schafer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "WISPA General List&qu
ock CPE-CPE traffic within the same AP and
independently feed each AP from a site router.
Rich
- Original Message -
From:
Tim Kerns
To: WISPA General List
Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2006 9:52
AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Network Storm
Ron,
Are you seeing icmp to
Very cool. I love gadgets too ... got'ta play with them all.
Rich, I don't agree.
But I've no idea what I said that you disagree with. What I said was I
don't see VoIP providing advanced services that the consumer marketplace as
a whole is going to pick-up (for exampl
plies too (when each
reply edits the same body, it quickly becomes impossible).
I know it's a religious preference / argument and
there's no right or wrong, only a preference ... but you wanted to
know "why", so ...
peace
Rich
- Original Message -
From:
their own equipment). Worse yet, the Ameritech
technicians had been issued ISDN capable CAT box's that were oblivious to D
channel delay (so they were swearing it was working because their "test" box
said it was working).
Rich
- Original Message -
From: "Blake Bowers&qu
party kicked in to cover
half of my phone bill since it was their equipment failure which caused the
problem.
ISDN ... got'ta love it ... not!
Rich
- Original Message -
From: "Travis Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Tues
d at a marginally lower price by IP providers that are not required to
charge the same government assessments the the traditional providers are
required to charge (at the moment).
Rich
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'WISPA General List'&qu
er. Tried ISDN myself for a few years. Like everything else, I
wanted to have my own hands-on experience with it ... and then dropped it
after a few years going back to analog POTS!
Rich
- Original Message -
From: "Peter R." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA Genera
on typical long distance? (and I'd argue
typical long distance is within US). Is $60/mo unmetered local & long
distance not available?
Rich
- Original Message -
From: "Matt Liotta" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Tuesday, Ju
old). Not one advanced ISDN feature
EVER became popular with consumers. Within the telecom industry ISDN
eventually became known by several alternate names, one of which was
"Inventions Subscribers Don't Need" (my favorite).
Rich
- Original Message -
From: "Peter R.
these topics had reborn again! :-) My mistake.
Rich
- Original Message -
From: "Rich Comroe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2006 7:33 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3650 equipment
Nah. What Charles misses in his commenta
istaken, there aren't any GPS-synced FM-based
FSK friends in the 3650 band. As long as the rules only type accept a
common interference avoidance spec (or a contention spec as many call it),
then unlicensed systems in the same band play nice.
Rich
- Original Message -
From: &quo
educe the potential for static discharge in the antenna to pop an antenna
coupler on the board. But I'd check if the antenna mount is
grounded to the same ground as the radio board.
Rich
- Original Message -
From:
Kelly
Shaw
To: 'WISPA General List'
ypals.
cheers,
Rich
- Original Message -
From: "Butch Evans" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2006 9:52 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] merchant accounts/credit cards
On Wed, 31 May 2006, Rich Comroe wrote:
Too many orders l
ith MIVA Merchant, and enabled credit
card clearing with LinkPoint CSI. Works great.
Rich
- Original Message -
From: "Brian Webster" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2006 3:14 PM
Subject: RE: [WISPA] merchant accounts/cr
have
APCO's seal of compliance to APCO user issued standards). In their market
APCO speaks for the buying power of the public safety users (as I believe
does CTIA).
Democracy, got'ta love it & hate it at the same time.
Rich
- Original Message -
From: "Tom DeReggi"
is on a WISPA
list, one of the biggest things the Cellular Carriers have working for them
is that their "Industry Association" (CTIA) has such a powerful influence
over the manufacturers who build equipment for their members. APCO (another
operators association, for public saf
Rich, with all due respect, your idea has a REALLY big flaw in it.
I love debate. I'll take that as a challenge :-)
Once government sets a standard, it's going to be a very long time before
anything new comes along.
No Darwinism (government standards, really that's what
ility rules. I just don't see our FCC
seeing things this way. There are too many that believe a free-for-all in
the market serves the public best. I don't agree.
Rich
- Original Message -
From: "Tom DeReggi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List
20dB or more excess
signal).
Canopy C/I is pretty much the same as all other technologies I'm aware of at
anywhere from typical to minimum signal levels. This of course omits the
high
constellation modulations which we all know requires significantly higher
C/I.
Rich
- Original Me
1 - 100 of 103 matches
Mail list logo
