routing  

Messages by Date

• 2002/04/20 Re: Data Elements for the WEDI-SNIP-CPP William J. Kammerer
• 2002/04/20 RE: Implementing HIPAA Transactions over the Internet Christopher J. Feahr, OD
• 2002/04/20 Data Elements for the WEDI-SNIP-CPP Christopher J. Feahr, OD
• 2002/04/19 RE: Supporting Certification in the Healthcare CPP Rachel Foerster
• 2002/04/19 RE: Supporting Certification in the Healthcare CPP David Frenkel
• 2002/04/19 Supporting Certification in the Healthcare CPP William J. Kammerer
• 2002/04/19 FW: IBM's IP statement to OASIS Rachel Foerster
• 2002/04/19 RE: FW: IBM patents issue response (from ebXML JCC) Rachel Foerster
• 2002/04/19 RE: IBM and ebXML David Frenkel
• 2002/04/19 FW: IBM and ebXML dalegibbs
• 2002/04/19 Re: FW: IBM patents issue response (from ebXML JCC) Christopher J. Feahr, OD
• 2002/04/18 FW: [ebxml-dev] IBM's IP statement to OASIS Rachel Foerster
• 2002/04/18 FW: IBM patents issue response (from ebXML JCC) Rachel Foerster
• 2002/04/18 FW: [ebxml-dev] Anyone else rather perturbed by IBM's recent announcement.... Rachel Foerster
• 2002/04/18 RE: When is a CH a payer, or provider, for that matter? Dave Minch
• 2002/04/18 Re: IBM ebXML patent claim William J. Kammerer
• 2002/04/18 RE: IBM ebXML patent claim Rachel Foerster
• 2002/04/18 Please take me off all of your listgroups Ann . M . Hale
• 2002/04/18 Re: IBM ebXML patent claim Kepa Zubeldia
• 2002/04/17 Re: When is a CH a payer, or provider, for that matter? William J. Kammerer
• 2002/04/17 IBM drops Internet patent bombshell David Frenkel
• 2002/04/16 Supporting aggregation can be made a first-class feature of our CPP William J. Kammerer
• 2002/04/15 Re: A proposed work plan for this group Bruce . Horn
• 2002/04/15 Re: A proposed work plan for this group Christopher J. Feahr, OD
• 2002/04/15 Re: A proposed work plan for this group William J. Kammerer
• 2002/04/15 Re: A proposed work plan for this group William J. Kammerer
• 2002/04/14 Re: A proposed work plan for this group William J. Kammerer
• 2002/04/14 RE: A proposed work plan for this group Ajay K sanghi
• 2002/04/13 ebXML Register in Beta Release Rachel Foerster
• 2002/04/12 Re: When is a CH a payer, or provider, for that matter? Christopher J. Feahr, OD
• 2002/04/12 Re: FW: A proposed work plan for this group Christopher J. Feahr, OD
• 2002/04/12 When is a CH a payer, or provider, for that matter? Dave Minch
• 2002/04/12 RE: A proposed work plan for this group Dave Minch
• 2002/04/12 Re: Why do we flap our lips so much about the ISA Receiver ID? William J. Kammerer
• 2002/04/12 Why do we flap our lips so much about the ISA Receiver ID? William J. Kammerer
• 2002/04/11 FW: A proposed work plan for this group dalegibbs
• 2002/04/11 I see no reason to act as if this practice is offensive. William J. Kammerer
• 2002/04/11 Re: A proposed work plan for this group William J. Kammerer
• 2002/04/11 RE: Who am I? Sender, Receiver, Intermediary, or just plain Chump? Ajay K sanghi
• 2002/04/11 RE: Are only 15 characters in the ISA receiver ID enough? Robert Huffman
• 2002/04/11 Re: A proposed work plan for this group Michael Mattias/Tal Systems
• 2002/04/11 RE: Who am I? Sender, Receiver, Intermediary, or just plain Chump? Rachel Foerster
• 2002/04/11 RE: Who am I? Sender, Receiver, Intermediary, or just plain Chump? Rachel Foerster
• 2002/04/11 RE: A proposed work plan for this group Rachel Foerster
• 2002/04/11 RE: Are only 15 characters in the ISA receiver ID enough? Rachel Foerster
• 2002/04/11 RE: A proposed work plan for this group Ajay K sanghi
• 2002/04/11 Interchange ID Qualifier William J. Kammerer
• 2002/04/11 Re: A proposed work plan for this group William J. Kammerer
• 2002/04/10 RE: Direct Submissions from Providers David Frenkel
• 2002/04/10 I've yet to see any call for "special needs" on the part of Clearinghouses William J. Kammerer
• 2002/04/10 Direct Submissions from Providers doug . renshaw
• 2002/04/10 RE: Routing & ID Workgroup Assumption Ajay K sanghi
• 2002/04/09 RE: Routing & ID Workgroup Assumption Ajay K sanghi
• 2002/04/09 RE: Routing & ID Workgroup Assumption David Frenkel
• 2002/04/09 Routing & ID Workgroup Assumption doug . renshaw
• 2002/04/09 RE: Are only 15 characters in the ISA receiver ID enough? Dave Minch
• 2002/04/09 Re: Routing & ID Workgroup Assumption William J. Kammerer
• 2002/04/09 RE: Who am I? Sender, Receiver, Intermediary, or just plain Chump? Michael Mattias/Tal Systems
• 2002/04/09 RE: Who am I? Sender, Receiver, Intermediary, or just plain Chump? William J. Kammerer
• 2002/04/09 RE: Are only 15 characters in the ISA receiver ID enough? Ronald Bowron
• 2002/04/08 RE: Who am I? Sender, Receiver, Intermediary, or just plain Chump? Ajay K sanghi
• 2002/04/08 RE: Who am I? Sender, Receiver, Intermediary, or just plain Chump? Christopher J. Feahr, OD
• 2002/04/08 RE: Who am I? Sender, Receiver, Intermediary, or just plain Chump? Ed Hafner
• 2002/04/08 Is encryption necessary for the transmission of transactions and images? angela . maher
• 2002/04/07 RE: Who am I? Sender, Receiver, Intermediary, or just plain Chump? Christopher J. Feahr, OD
• 2002/04/07 RE: Who am I? Sender, Receiver, Intermediary, or just plain Chump? Ed Hafner
• 2002/04/06 Re: Who am I? Sender, Receiver, Intermediary, or just plain Chump? Christopher J. Feahr, OD
• 2002/04/06 A proposed work plan for this group Rachel Foerster
• 2002/04/05 Who am I? Sender, Receiver, Intermediary, or just plain Chump? William J. Kammerer
• 2002/04/05 RE: Are only 15 characters in the ISA receiver ID enough? Rachel Foerster
• 2002/04/05 RE: Are only 15 characters in the ISA receiver ID enough? Dave Minch
• 2002/04/05 Re: How can we treat real time as a secondary issue? Michael Mattias/Tal Systems
• 2002/04/05 RE: Voice of Reason Dave Minch
• 2002/04/05 RE: Are only 15 characters in the ISA receiver ID enough? Dave Minch
• 2002/04/05 Re: Voice of Reason Mimi Hart
• 2002/04/04 RE: Are only 15 characters in the ISA receiver ID enough? Christopher J. Feahr, OD
• 2002/04/04 FW: How can we treat real time as a secondary issue? Dave Minch
• 2002/04/04 Voice of Reason Dave Minch
• 2002/04/04 RE: Are only 15 characters in the ISA receiver ID enough? Rachel Foerster
• 2002/04/04 RE: How can we treat real time as a secondary issue? Dave Minch
• 2002/04/04 Re: Are only 15 characters in the ISA receiver ID enough? William J. Kammerer
• 2002/04/04 RE: How can we treat real time as a secondary issue? Rachel Foerster
• 2002/04/03 Re: How can we treat real time as a secondary issue? joe mcverry
• 2002/04/03 RE: How can we treat real time as a secondary issue? Fody, Kenneth W.
• 2002/04/03 Re: How can we treat real time as a secondary issue? William J. Kammerer
• 2002/04/03 Re: How can we treat real time as a secondary issue? joe mcverry
• 2002/04/03 RE: How can we treat real time as a secondary issue? David Frenkel
• 2002/04/03 How can we treat real time as a secondary issue? William J. Kammerer
• 2002/04/03 Re: Are only 15 characters in the ISA receiver ID enough? William J. Kammerer
• 2002/04/02 RE: Are only 15 characters in the ISA receiver ID enough? Dave Minch
• 2002/04/02 RE: Are only 15 characters in the ISA receiver ID enough? David Frenkel
• 2002/04/02 Re: Are only 15 characters in the ISA receiver ID enough? Kepa Zubeldia
• 2002/04/02 Re: Are only 15 characters in the ISA receiver ID enough? Christopher J. Feahr, OD
• 2002/04/02 Re: Are only 15 characters in the ISA receiver ID enough? William J. Kammerer
• 2002/04/02 Are only 15 characters in the ISA receiver ID enough? William J. Kammerer
• 2002/04/01 Healthcare CPP registry services William J. Kammerer
• 2002/04/01 Ride Share to HIPAA-COW 4/12/02? Michael Mattias/Tal Systems
• 2002/03/31 RE: Update on CPP effort. Fody, Kenneth W.
• 2002/03/30 RE: Update on CPP effort. Dick Brooks
• 2002/03/29 Re: Payers sure do like proprietary provider IDs! Do providers feel the same way? Christopher J. Feahr, OD
• 2002/03/29 Re: Payers sure do like proprietary provider IDs! Do providers feel the same way? Michael Mattias/Tal Systems
• 2002/03/29 Re: Payers sure do like proprietary provider IDs! Do providers feel the same way? William J. Kammerer
• 2002/03/29 Re: A Rose By Any Other Name... Christopher J. Feahr, OD
• 2002/03/29 RE: What's the focus?[ID to be used as "key" to the CPP registry] David Frenkel
• 2002/03/29 RE: Payers sure do like proprietary provider IDs! Do providers feel the same way? David Frenkel
• 2002/03/29 RE: What's the focus?[ID to be used as "key" to the CPP registry] Christopher J. Feahr, OD
• 2002/03/29 Re: Update on CPP effort. William J. Kammerer
• 2002/03/29 RE: Payers sure do like proprietary provider IDs! Do providers feel the same way? Fody, Kenneth W.
• 2002/03/29 RE: Update on CPP effort. Fody, Kenneth W.
• 2002/03/29 Re: Update on CPP effort. William J. Kammerer
• 2002/03/29 A Rose By Any Other Name... William J. Kammerer
• 2002/03/28 Re: Payers sure do like proprietary provider IDs! Do providers feel the same way? William J. Kammerer
• 2002/03/28 Update on CPP effort. Dick Brooks
• 2002/03/28 RE: Payers sure do like proprietary provider IDs! Do providers feel the same way? David Frenkel
• 2002/03/28 RE: What's the focus? David Frenkel
• 2002/03/28 Re: What's the focus? Christopher J. Feahr, OD
• 2002/03/28 Re: What's the focus? William J. Kammerer
• 2002/03/28 RE: What's the focus? Rachel Foerster
• 2002/03/28 Re: What's the focus? William J. Kammerer
• 2002/03/28 Re: What's the focus? William J. Kammerer
• 2002/03/28 What's the focus? Rachel Foerster
• 2002/03/28 RE: FYI - Statistical info David Frenkel
• 2002/03/28 What's the focus? Rachel Foerster
• 2002/03/28 Re: Payers sure do like proprietary provider IDs! Do providers feel the same way? William J. Kammerer
• 2002/03/28 RE: FYI - Statistical info Rachel Foerster
• 2002/03/28 FYI - Statistical info David Frenkel
• 2002/03/28 using DDE infrastructure as a formal transport mechanism for EDI messages Christopher J. Feahr, OD
• 2002/03/28 RE: Payers sure do like proprietary provider IDs! Do providers feel the same way? Christopher J. Feahr, OD
• 2002/03/28 RE: Payers sure do like proprietary provider IDs! Do providers feel the same way? Dave Minch
• 2002/03/28 Re: Payers sure do like proprietary provider IDs! Do providers feel the same way? William J. Kammerer
• 2002/03/27 Re: Payers sure do like proprietary provider IDs! Do providers feel the same way? Christopher J. Feahr, OD
• 2002/03/27 Re: Payers sure do like proprietary provider IDs! Do providers feel the same way? William J. Kammerer
• 2002/03/27 RE: HIN numbers: I'll show you mine if you show me yours.... Quinkert, Lin
• 2002/03/27 RE: HIN numbers: I'll show you mine if you show me yours.... Rachel Foerster
• 2002/03/27 RE: Payers sure do like proprietary provider IDs! Do providers feel the same way? Fody, Kenneth W.
• 2002/03/27 Re: More Stuff and Questions on Routing Identifiers Michael Mattias/Tal Systems
• 2002/03/27 Companion Guides as Proprietary Company Confidential Information? William J. Kammerer
• 2002/03/26 Say, why do you think UDDI sucks? William J. Kammerer
• 2002/03/26 Re: HIN numbers: I'll show you mine if you show me yours.... William J. Kammerer
• 2002/03/26 Re: More Stuff and Questions on Routing Identifiers joe mcverry
• 2002/03/26 RE: HIN numbers: I'll show you mine if you show me yours.... Rachel Foerster
• 2002/03/26 HIN numbers: I'll show you mine if you show me yours.... William J. Kammerer
• 2002/03/26 RE: More Stuff and Questions on Routing Identifiers Dave Minch
• 2002/03/26 RE: More Stuff and Questions on Routing Identifiers Rachel Foerster
• 2002/03/26 RE: ebXML Registry Dave Minch
• 2002/03/26 Payers sure do like proprietary provider IDs! Do providers feel the same way? William J. Kammerer
• 2002/03/26 More Stuff and Questions on Routing Identifiers William J. Kammerer
• 2002/03/23 ebXML Registry William J. Kammerer
• 2002/03/22 Call For Speakers Melissa Wittenberg
• 2002/03/22 RE: Medicare and Medicaid paper claims Rachel Foerster
• 2002/03/21 RE: Discovery of WEDi/SNIP CPPs using the OASIS ebXML Registry Rachel Foerster
• 2002/03/20 Discovery of WEDi/SNIP CPPs using the OASIS ebXML Registry William J. Kammerer
• 2002/03/20 FW: Four Vendors Complete ebXML Messaging vs 2.0 Interoperability Pilot Rachel Foerster
• 2002/03/20 The ID & Routing teleconference planned for 03-22 (Friday) 1:30 - 2:30 EST has been cancelled. William J. Kammerer
• 2002/03/18 TPA Discovery as seen by the developer (redux) Michael Mattias/Tal Systems
• 2002/03/18 TPA Discovery as seen by the developer PPPS_INFO
• 2002/03/15 Sample Data, De-Identification Software and e-mail Digital IDs William J. Kammerer
• 2002/03/15 Re: Identifiers John Bristor
• 2002/03/15 Re: Identifiers William J. Kammerer
• 2002/03/15 Re: Identifiers John Bristor
• 2002/03/15 Identifiers William J. Kammerer
• 2002/03/12 Fw: [EDI-L] <MISC> Pet Peeve William J. Kammerer
• 2002/03/09 Re: Today's WEDi/SNIP ID & Routing teleconference call Ronald Bowron
• 2002/03/08 Today's WEDi/SNIP ID & Routing teleconference call William J. Kammerer
• 2002/03/08 WEDi/AFEHCT Communication Interoperability Project Industry Survey Workgroup Charter William J. Kammerer
• 2002/03/08 Re: [ebxml-cppa] WEDi/SNIP Electronic Trading Partner Agreements for HIPAA William J. Kammerer
• 2002/03/08 WEDi/SNIP ID & Routing teleconference call from 1:30 - 2:30 EST Today William J. Kammerer
• 2002/03/07 Re: Electronic Trading Partner Agreements - 3/5 Conversation with DWT William J. Kammerer
• 2002/03/06 RE: Electronic Trading Partner Agreements - 3/5 Conversation with DWT Rachel Foerster
• 2002/03/06 RE: How's EDI accomplished in HIPAA? Rachel Foerster
• 2002/03/06 Re: How's EDI accomplished in HIPAA? William J. Kammerer
• 2002/03/06 FYI - Inroduction of the WEDi/SNIP e-TPA to the OASIS ebXML Collaboration Protocol Profile and Agreement Technical Committee William J. Kammerer
• 2002/03/06 RE: How's EDI accomplished in HIPAA? Dave Minch
• 2002/03/06 FW: Use of the 838 for electronic exchange of TPA data Dave Minch
• 2002/03/06 FW: Electronic Trading Partner Agreements - 3/5 Conversation with DWT Dave Minch
• 2002/03/06 How's EDI accomplished in HIPAA? Luis E. Cotto
• 2002/03/05 Re: Trading Partner Agreements Kepa Zubeldia
• 2002/03/05 Trading Partner Agreements William J. Kammerer
• 2002/03/04 RE: Correspondence with Tim Collins re: EDI Addressing Protocols Dave Minch
• 2002/03/04 RE: Twenty-second "elevator" Pitch as Project Purpose in the 6010 document Dick Brooks
• 2002/03/04 Proposed Changes to the 6010 ID & EDI Address Project Org Document William J. Kammerer
• 2002/03/03 We have another "volunteer"! - this time for the e-TPA "auto-discovery" code using the DNS "Directory" William J. Kammerer
• 2002/03/03 RE: Twenty-second "elevator" Pitch as Project Purpose in the 6010 document Christopher J. Feahr, OD
• 2002/03/02 RE: Twenty-second "elevator" Pitch as Project Purpose in the 6010 document Dick Brooks
• 2002/03/02 Re: Twenty-second "elevator" Pitch as Project Purpose in the 6010 document William J. Kammerer
• 2002/03/01 Schemas for Addresses, contact info, online addresses Rachel Foerster
• 2002/03/01 Re: Twenty-second "elevator" Pitch Christopher J. Feahr, OD
• 2002/03/01 Re: Submitter/receiver William J. Kammerer
• 2002/03/01 Re: Submitter/receiver Christopher J. Feahr, OD
• 2002/03/01 Re: Requirements Gathering - Information Flows William J. Kammerer
• 2002/03/01 Re: Submitter/receiver Ronald Bowron
• 2002/03/01 Re: Submitter/receiver Christopher J. Feahr, OD
• 2002/02/28 Twenty-second "elevator" Pitch William J. Kammerer
• 2002/02/28 Electronic Trading Partner Agreement "Discovery" William J. Kammerer
• 2002/02/28 Corrected 6010 and 6320 Papers available at http://www.novannet.com/wedi/ William J. Kammerer
• 2002/02/26 Just what is it we're supposed to be doing? William J. Kammerer
• 2002/02/26 RE: Requirements Gathering - Information Flows Dave Minch
• 2002/02/26 RE: Requirements Gathering - Information Flows Rachel Foerster
• 2002/02/25 RE: Requirements Gathering - Information Flows Ronald Bowron
• 2002/02/25 RE: Electronic Trading Partner Agreements Rachel Foerster

• Earlier messages
• Later messages