doing away with it?
Sorry for being unclear. My suggestion was that the IPMC only votes
in the exceptional case where an IPMC member requests a vote. My
assertion is that oversight and the opportunity to intercede when
needed is sufficient.
> Thanks,
> Justin
- Sam Ruby
-
ed by the IPMC, I will offer to help
update [1] to reflect that a different process applies during
incubation.
- Sam Ruby
[1] https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#ReleaseVotes
[2] https://whimsy.apache.org/board/minutes/PMC_Membership_Change_Process.html
---
convenient mechanism to query
this information.
- Sam Ruby
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
wered to make business
decisions on behalf of the ASF. This would include pulling a release
or disbanding a committee.
Now I'm not suggesting that you start vetoing anything. I'm just
saying that should you find yourself i
or more ways, given that those deviations are
documented, there exists a plan to fix those deviations, and that
podling graduation is gated on the fixing of those deficiencies.
> Thanks,
> Justin
- Sam Ruby
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
omply with the terms of that license.
In the case of strong copyleft licenses, that could mean that the
podling release itself may need also be GPL licensed.
2) Is it legal to include compiled code in releases? Yes.
3) Is it legal to include copyright violations in releases? No.
> Craig
- Sam R
n approach I have found much more successful: come up with a
proposal. Often times it will get approved. Some times you will be
asked to make changes. And some times you will get yelled at.
But one thing you will get is a crisp answer.
- Sam Ruby
P.S. Don't take this advice as recommending t
ml
We need to figuring out what the desired end result (currently I
believe that this is spec'ed someplace as less than 80 characters per
line and no wiki markup, but I forget where), and then work backwards
to figure out when these changes are to be mad. It is entirely
possible
u might be able to save a
good fraction of that half hour a month of effort.
> Thanks,
> Justin
- Sam Ruby
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
iting after that to fix things. It usually takes an hour of my time.
Perhaps next time, save the before and after and the whimsy team can
take a look at how much of it can be automated.
> Thanks,
> Justin
- Sam Ruby
-
ue to allow the text format be
edited directly (and many of us still find that to be convenient at
times).
- Sam Ruby
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
On Sat, Apr 13, 2019 at 7:29 AM Shane Curcuru wrote:
>
> Sam Ruby wrote on 4/12/19 9:48 PM:
> > On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 2:42 PM Sam Ruby wrote:
> >>
> >> 3) Somebody uses the whimsy board agenda tool to update the incubator
> >> report, and it dutifully str
On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 2:42 PM Sam Ruby wrote:
>
> 3) Somebody uses the whimsy board agenda tool to update the incubator
> report, and it dutifully strips out the previous report (up to said
> row of dashes) an inserts a new report.
Here is the regular expression in ques
It’s a bug in whimsey that cause the reports to be doubled I’ll check today
> and fix in SVN if needed but the only issue shod be sign off and comment on
> Spot.
Careful, or I will may make whimsy reject any incubator report that
contains attachment separator li
one or
more lines that look line and end of report.
3) Somebody uses the whimsy board agenda tool to update the incubator
report, and it dutifully strips out the previous report (up to said
row of dashes) an inserts a new report.
o update
as new TLPs are created and projects are retired. There may
occasionally be special cases to handle like the rename of Zest =>
Polygene.
- Sam Ruby
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
rbine, Velocity,
Web Services< Xalan, Xerces, XML Graphics, Yetus, Zookepper
Non-code PMC:
Attic, Community Development, Incubator, Labs, Public Relations
- Sam Ruby
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
found in the establish resolution, which makes sense as no
establish resolution was found.
- Sam Ruby
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
I've gone ahead and added information from podlings.xml to this data.
We have a number of entries which are in podlings.xml but don't
contain incubator in their establishment resolution (Tika, Tapestry,
Pig, Myfaces...)
- Sam Ruby
On Sun, Mar 31, 2019 at 8:08 PM Sam Ruby wrote:
>
> In Ma
, and some
projects like comdev -- while technically "bypassing" the incubator --
are not the types of projects you are looking for.
- Sam Ruby
On Sun, Mar 31, 2019 at 7:28 AM Sharan Foga wrote:
>
> Hi All
>
> Does anyone know if there is a list of projects that bypassed incu
f1b12407af@%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E
As to your third question... I guess it would be possible (but weird)
for somebody to want to stop as a mentor but continue as a committer
(and possibly a PMC member).
- Sam Ruby
On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 8:57 AM sebb wrote:
>
> Are podling mentors expected to be in the L
o be done first. And as far as I know, it is a button,
> however only infra and secretary can push that button.
Correct. The authority required to execute that request is the same
authority required to delete (or modify) any PMC or podling.
> John
- Sam Ruby
> On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 6:33 AM Jus
er if this information was maintained in one place. A
place that can be used for things like authentication. That place is
LDAP.
- Sam Ruby
> On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 2:38 PM, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
>> Just as a reminder, podling rosters only
this, change the name to "First Apache release" or something.
>
> 8. Provide the ability to lookup the information required to fill out
> the status page. How can a podling find out when the SGA was received?
> Please remember that podling personnel can change during incubat
le to do the same for other fields.
> HTH,
>
> John
- Sam Ruby
> On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 8:52 PM Jim Apple <jbap...@cloudera.com> wrote:
>
>> I'm confused. The message to podlings@ said "If you're not sure what
>> to fill out, feel free to reach out."
&g
Sorry about that. Fixed. Thanks for reviewing the output!
- Sam Ruby
On Sun, Jun 11, 2017 at 12:31 PM, Adina Crainiceanu <ad...@usna.edu> wrote:
> John,
>
> I'm a committer and PPMC member for Rya
>
> Adina
>
> On Sun, Jun 11, 2017 at 12:23 PM, John D. Ament <
On Sun, Jun 11, 2017 at 7:58 AM, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 11, 2017 at 5:58 AM sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On 11 June 2017 at 00:18, Sam Ruby <ru...@intertwingly.net> wrote:
>> > On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 6:10 PM, Sam
On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 6:10 PM, Sam Ruby <ru...@intertwingly.net> wrote:
>
> For that reason, I'd like to make a simplifying assumption: that all mentors
> are PPMC members, and all PPMC members are committers.
Existing records that violate one or more assumptions:
https://wh
pache.org/repos/asf
- Sam Ruby
P.S. How does one search github?
https://github.com/orgs/apache/repos doesn't appear to work, despite
what https://developer.github.com/v3/repos/#list-your-repositories
seems to imply.
-
To unsu
On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 7:43 AM, Sam Ruby <ru...@intertwingly.net> wrote:
>
> YAML is more human editable than JSON. As Sebb points out elsewhere,
> it also supports comments.
Alternative: create DOAP files for podlings. In general, model
podlings like PMCs as much and as s
On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 7:49 AM, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 7:44 AM Sam Ruby <ru...@intertwingly.net> wrote:
>>
>> Some of the data that you mentioned doesn't need to be in the status
>> file as it can be generated
.
This not only will save a few minutes, the resolution will contain the
correct names and ids.
- Sam Ruby
On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 7:11 AM, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 6:40 AM sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On 6 June 2017 at 04:22
he "Draft graduation resolution" at the bottom
of the page. It can help you draft a resolution that contains correct
names and IDs, etc.
> Suma
- Sam Ruby
> On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 7:46 PM, Sam Ruby <ru...@intertwingly.net> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 6:25 P
ill
be notified of your changes.
> Thanks
> Suma
- Sam Ruby
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
at page
that will draft and post a establish PMC resolution to the board agenda.
- Sam Ruby
> On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 8:33 PM Suma Shivaprasad <suma...@apache.org>
wrote:
>
>> Dear Incubator members,
>>
>> Please note that the community vote for graduating Apache Atlas
On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 10:18 PM, Sam Ruby <ru...@intertwingly.net> wrote:
> On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 9:19 PM, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> wrote:
>> On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 6:10 PM Sam Ruby <ru...@intertwingly.net> wrote:
>
>>> Adding a new co
On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 9:19 PM, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> wrote:
> On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 6:10 PM Sam Ruby <ru...@intertwingly.net> wrote:
>
>> Gitbox has been updated, our ponymail installation has been updated, our
>> svn server will be updated soon.
might
not be practical as stated due to difference in access control between
the various lists. Even if that turns out to be the case, a tool can be
created to identify differences and enable bulk updating.
- Sam Ruby
d.
>
> That seems, to me, a restriction that Whimsy should fix...
> None of my subscriptions to any private PMC lists that I'm on
> are with my a.o address, and I'm guessing I'm not unique there.
Any email address you add via id.apache.org may be accessed via the
dropdown at https:/
On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 9:24 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
<bdelacre...@codeconsult.ch> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 1:55 PM, Sam Ruby <ru...@intertwingly.net> wrote:
>> ...The very first line of this thread is a link to an INFRA ticket. A
>> comment on that ticke
On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 3:38 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
<bdelacre...@codeconsult.ch> wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 8, 2017 at 8:23 PM, Sam Ruby <ru...@intertwingly.net> wrote:
>> ...Can I just work with the infrastructure team to
>> make this happen? Do we need a formal vote?..
e.
>[...]
> If you look at the committer vs PPMC thing, one other item may be to not
> email private@incubator for new podling committers - its not relevant to us.
cc private@incubator only for PPMC changes but not committ
On Sun, Apr 9, 2017 at 11:09 AM, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 8, 2017 at 2:23 PM Sam Ruby <ru...@intertwingly.net> wrote:
>
>> What's the next step? Can I just work with the infrastructure team to
>> make this happen? Do we need a for
What's the next step? Can I just work with the infrastructure team to
make this happen? Do we need a formal vote?
- Sam Ruby
On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 1:06 AM, Sam Ruby <ru...@intertwingly.net> wrote:
> Background, from https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-13804
>
>>
y to fix your
> notification scheme easily in github -
> https://github.com/settings/notifications - uncheck "Automatically Watch
> Repositories"
I think I covered that in the paragraph that begins with "I believe
that asking all IPMC members to uncheck "Automatically watch
it privileges on all Incubator repositories.
I believe that the alternative is technically feasible: have each
podling manage a list of committers for that podling:
https://whimsy.apache.org/roster/ppmc/
- Sam Ruby
-
To
On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 8:51 PM, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 8:25 PM Sam Ruby <ru...@intertwingly.net> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 1:37 PM, Felix Meschberger <fmesc...@adobe.com>
>> wrote:
>> >
>
re trying to improve
it.
> Thanks
> Felix
- Sam Ruby
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 1:05 PM, Sam Ruby <ru...@intertwingly.net> wrote:
> Current status: for ppmcs that have lists in the subversion puppet
> definitions, those lists have been loaded into LDAP, and augmented with
> mentor information from podlings.xml. A list of all curre
On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 1:57 PM, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 1:11 PM Sam Ruby <ru...@intertwingly.net> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 1:31 PM, Stian Soiland-Reyes <st...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>> > N
are no such private list designated, it
goes to private@incubator.
If people would like, I could always copy private@incubator on all
changes for additional oversight. That might be a bit much, however.
- Sam Ruby
-
PMC members who aren't PMC chairs can't update
their own lists.
- Sam Ruby
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Charith Elvitigala
Note that John Ament indicated his intention to vote -1 on any
OpenWhisk release until the "GitHub as master" issue is resolved by
the Apache Infrastructure team.
- Sam Ruby
On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 10:22 AM, Sam Ruby <ru...@intertwingly.net> wrote:
> Now
hours. Please VOTE as follows
[] +1 Accept OpenWhisk into the Apache Incubator
[] +0 Abstain.
[] -1 Do not accept OpenWhisk into the Apache Incubator because ...
The proposal is listed below, but you can also access it on the wiki:
https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OpenWhiskProposal
- Sam Ruby
On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 9:45 PM, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 9:30 PM Sam Ruby <ru...@intertwingly.net> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 9:10 PM, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>> > I'm +0.5 f
he goal, for quite some time now, has been to resolve GitHub as a
Master one way or another. It is time to do so. If the conclusion is
that GitHub as a Master is not to be, OpenWhisk will need to be
migrated at that time. Until then, there is no reason to migrate it
only to potentially migrate it back
eople return from ACEU, so
probably early December.
- Sam Ruby
> On Mon, Nov 7, 2016, 15:24 Chris Mattmann <mattm...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> As some of you may have seen the OpenWhisk podling being discussed now has
>> requested to use GitHub as its p
t some point is a very real, statistical possibility,
> and be serious in our efforts in ensuring this podling/project
> can and will survive that.
Agreed on both points: this is a general concern that should apply
On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 1:31 AM, Greg Stein <gst...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 3:27 PM, Sam Ruby <ru...@intertwingly.net> wrote:
>
>> Hello everyone,
>>
>> Attached to this message is a proposed new project - Apache OpenWhisk.
>>
>
forward to your feedback and input.
- Sam Ruby
OpenWhisk Proposal
/OpenWhisk is an open source, distributed //Serverless/
<https://developer.ibm.com/openwhisk/what-is-serverless-computing/>/computing
platform able to execute application logic (Actions) in response to
events (Triggers
On 2016-09-02 12:41 (-0400), Sam Ruby <ru...@intertwingly.net> wrote:
>
> Longer term this change would lay the groundwork for more fine-grained
> access control whereever it may be desired: not just for svn, but also
> for web pages, git, and any other location that can be
g the owners, with mentors providing oversight.
> Many podlings don't have a clear distinction - at least not in listings.
> Perhaps they should..
>From a technical point of view, that's not an issue. So the question
is what does the IPMC want here?
- Sam Ruby
> On 22 Sep 2016 3
count request, you might
want to try https://whimsy.apache.org/officers/acreq/; it loads much
faster than https://id.apache.org/acreq/; if you like it, spread the
word.
- Sam Ruby
> On 2 September 2016 at 18:52, Sam Ruby <ru...@intertwingly.net> wrote:
>> On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 12:49 PM, John D. Ame
On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 12:49 PM, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 12:42 PM Sam Ruby <ru...@intertwingly.net> wrote:
>
>> The first stage would be migrating existing lists to LDAP. This will
>> require some small changes to whimsy
On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 1:06 PM, Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> On 02/09/2016 17:41, Sam Ruby wrote:
>> To prepare, we will need to decide who gets to modify these lists, and
>> who gets notified. I propose that members of podlings be able to modify
>> the
ined
access control whereever it may be desired: not just for svn, but also
for web pages, git, and any other location that can be configured to use
LDAP to obtain ACL information.
- Sam Ruby
-
To unsubscribe, e-ma
eadme
- Sam Ruby
> On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 9:04 AM Sam Ruby <ru...@intertwingly.net> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 4:06 AM, Daniel Gruno <humbed...@apache.org> wrote:
>> > On 08/08/2016 10:03 AM, Christopher wrote:
>> >> On Mon, Aug 8,
application to take a different
data source?
You could have svn as a data source, and have a web interface.
> Shouldn't take long to make that :)
>
> With regards,
> Daniel.
>
> ------
On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 12:19 AM, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 5:52 PM Sam Ruby <ru...@intertwingly.net> wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 11:21 PM, John D. Ament <john.d.am...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >
ide would be available to all of Whimsy's applications, and
not be locked into this one. It also will make this script even
smaller.
- Sam Ruby
> John
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 1:56 AM, Daniel Gruno <humbed...@apache.org> wrote:
> Since it seems the discussion has died down, I am now calling a vote on
> accepting Pony Mail into the Incubator. Sorry in advance for potato.
>
> This vote will run for the usual 72 hours.
+1 (bi
the Apache Way before. What is listed is the bare bones
> group of people who have worked on Pony Mail in one way or the other (I
> should probably add Sam Ruby to that list), there are other peripheral
> people who are curious but also have no experience with Apache.
Too late, I've al
uld be a good home
> for a related toolkit.
It was proposed as a separate project from the beginning by a member
of the Open Office community.
- Sam Ruby
> Harbs
>
> On Mar 28, 2016, at 2:33 PM, Sam Ruby <ru...@intertwingly.net> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 6:44 AM
On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 7:36 AM, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 7:33 AM Sam Ruby <ru...@intertwingly.net> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 6:44 AM, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>> > Both
I peek in expecting to make a recommendation one way or
another, but not seeing anything worth adding. I honestly don't know
what to recommend.
- Sam Ruby
> John
>
> On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 2:00 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>
On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 9:37 PM, Greg Stein <gst...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 8:27 PM, Sam Ruby <ru...@intertwingly.net> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 1:24 PM, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>> > *
On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 1:24 PM, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> wrote:
> * Graduations
>
> The board has motions for the following:
>
> - Sentry
Not... yet. :-)
Does somebody intend to post this to th
NOTICE file, then by their their/our
license, we are obligated to include it in our NOTICE file (see Apache
License, Version 2 section 4, item d). Others can weigh in on short
vs long form of the licenses (it is a single copy, so I personally
don't see the issue), but as a legally required notice, it bel
PIng? Can I get a confirmation that you are OK with Toree proceeding
under similar circumstances? They are actively working towards a
release.
If you like, I can open a legal JIRA or move this to legal-discuss.
- Sam Ruby
On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 9:04 AM, Sam Ruby <ru...@intertwingly.
I would hope that that request would be OK
too?
- Sam Ruby
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
compliant with
> all Apache policies.
>
> See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-86 for an example of
> where incubating releases were allowed with a runtime dependency on a
> non-approved license. Just as Greg laid out, a plan was proposed for
> removing the dependency b
goal is to be a
no-brainer.
> If it's not, then that's going to be a fundamental barrier to releasing Torii
> as ASF-signed off artifacts
- Sam Ruby
[1] http://zeromq.org/area:licensing
>>> On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 10:33 AM, Luciano Resende <luckbr1...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>
e a name from this list and replace a random vowel
with a 'y':
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moons_of_Jupiter#List
Example: Eyropa.
- Sam Ruby
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
+1 (binding)
- Sam Ruby
On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 10:33 AM, Luciano Resende <luckbr1...@gmail.com> wrote:
> After initial discussion (under the name Spark-Kernel), please vote on the
> acceptance of Torii Project for incubation at the Apache Incubator. The
> full proposal is
> av
On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 5:18 PM, Greg Stein <gst...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 4:02 PM, Sam Ruby <ru...@intertwingly.net> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 4:51 PM, Greg Stein <gst...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > Don't shut down tru
On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 9:13 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <c...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> And that goes, as always, to the question "Who makes the decision about the
> _right_ level of trust".
The community.
- Sam Ruby
---
development
model available to a project. As an example, I've seen models where
'trunk/master is for product maintenance', and all development occurs
in a branch explicitly designated as where work on the next release is
to occur.
, and CTR is arguably more appropriate. I'm fine with that
too.
- Sam Ruby
P.S. My personal preference remains CTR. I would much rather be
reverted with an explanation than to be ignored without one.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: ge
ng to force
something? And if not, doesn't that mean that it isn't really all
that destructive?
As a Director, would you consider stop approving reports from ASF
projects that operate under a RTC model? If not, aren't you sending a
mixed message?
- Sam Ruby
P.S. To be clear: I am not a fan of RTC when applied to
On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 7:10 AM, Greg Stein <gst...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 5:57 AM, Sam Ruby <ru...@intertwingly.net> wrote:
>
>>
>> P.S. To be clear: I am not a fan of RTC when applied to release.next
>> branches.
>
> I'd apprecia
+1 here too.
Most projects here fall somewhere in a spectrum between "do whatever
you want in a branch" and "don't release without having others approve
your work". Different projects put the point where CTR crosses over
to RTC at different points.
*shrug*
- Sam Ruby
P.
R also uses RTC at points, I believe that is a
> given.
Let me be pedantic for a moment. While RTC projects that use
Subversion may disallow work in branches, even by committers; such a
restriction isn't even possible in Git -- even for non committers.
> Ross
- Sam Ruby
> -Original Messag
On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 11:47 AM, Ted Dunning <ted.dunn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 21, 2015 at 12:40 AM, Sam Ruby <ru...@intertwingly.net> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 11:23 AM, Ross Gardler
>> <ross.gard...@microsoft.com> wrote:
>>
de of that context, it
> sounds like it is the spark-core module, which this obviously isn't.
That name is indeed unlikely to survive incubation, particularly if
this result of graduation is a separate PMC (as opposed to, say,
becoming a subproject of Apach
re reasons for powers-that-be to
> give us grief.
The powers that be (a.k.a., the board) either need to reinstate Jim as
VP of Affairs or find a replacement, and then hold that individual
(and associated committee) accountable for revisiting this issue.
- Sam Ruby
-
e processed like this, even if the external
developer is already an ASF committer."
Source: http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/
At a minimum, the word "SVN" should be removed. Any other changes
people feel are necessary?
- Sam Ruby
-
rely to make sure that we capture all of the
relevant history (IP provenance) for posterity.
> Would github PR's fall under the same premise, since the contents of those
> mails become public record?
See above.
- Sam Ruby
> On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 7:51 AM Sam Ruby <ru...@intertwingly
On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 8:09 AM, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 8:07 AM Greg Stein <gst...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 2:15 AM, Sam Ruby <ru...@intertwingly.net> wrote:
>> >...
>>
>> &g
On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 10:17 PM, Greg Stein <gst...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Oct 22, 2015 9:57 AM, "Sam Ruby" <ru...@intertwingly.net> wrote:
>>...
>> I've also opened another issue that I would appreciate feedback on:
>>
>> https://issues.apache.
On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 2:32 AM, Greg Stein <gst...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Oct 23, 2015 1:01 AM, "Sam Ruby" <ru...@intertwingly.net> wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 10:17 PM, Greg Stein <gst...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > On Oct 22, 201
1 - 100 of 404 matches
Mail list logo
