RE: Compression on 2610 routers [7:64702]
We have typical office-envirement: some word, excel, some host, web. HW-compression brings up to 9:1 (average, i thing 4-5:1). Take attention with SW, even a 72xx can't handle many of SW compressed links. Lupi is right. Before implementing you have to test. Ask your Cisco Provider for AIM Boards to test (and the rigt IOS) Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=64889&t=64702 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Compression on 2610 routers [7:64702]
For SW you don't need an AIM. HW requires an AIM example of HW compression: frame-relay payload-compression FRF9 stac caim 0 for SW replace stac caim 0 with software. Be sure, that 12.1 work well wiht your central Router. We had som troubles with a 7206 on central site. we are now on 12.2.12 hope this is what you need Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=64703&t=64702 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Compression on 2610 routers [7:64702]
Hi all I am planning to implement Compression on all my Routers. We are using cisco 2610 routers with IOS 12.1 at all my locations. guide me how i can go about it. I had read on Internet that there is a AIM module for compression. is there any configuration to be done on routers for enabling compression.I had read on internet that we can implement hardware as well as software compression. what is the difference between two. do you need the AIM modules for implementing software compression. Can anyone explain me in detail. Urgent Response please. Thanks/Regards, K.Srinivas Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=64702&t=64702 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
QOS on IOS 12.1.10 2610 Router [7:61269]
I can only apply service-policy out "name" to the main interface but not to sub interfaces. Can some one tell me if it automatically applyes to sub interfaces. Thanks Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=61269&t=61269 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 2610 801.Q Trunks [7:54481]
Please see the link below for details Only for the built-in 10BaseT port of 261x at IOS 12.2(2) T Regards..mc http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/routers/ps259/prod_bulletin09186a0080 0921e4.html - Original Message - From: "Darren Ward" To: Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 4:08 AM Subject: Re: 2610 801.Q Trunks [7:54481] > Only ISL is unsupported, for that you require a fast ether interface. > > Darren > > Firesox wrote: > > >I thought 802.1Q trunking is only supported on FastEthernet interfaces, not > >Ehternet interfaces. > >I was able to create 802.1Q trunks on 2610 router with ethernet interface. > >Does someone know exactlly what version of IOS support 802.1Q trunks on > >2610 routers? > > > >Thanks > -- > Darren Ward > (PGradCS, CCIE#8245, CCDP, SCSA, MCP) Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=56643&t=54481 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 2610 801.Q Trunks [7:54481]
Only ISL is unsupported, for that you require a fast ether interface. Darren Firesox wrote: >I thought 802.1Q trunking is only supported on FastEthernet interfaces, not >Ehternet interfaces. >I was able to create 802.1Q trunks on 2610 router with ethernet interface. >Does someone know exactlly what version of IOS support 802.1Q trunks on >2610 routers? > >Thanks -- Darren Ward (PGradCS, CCIE#8245, CCDP, SCSA, MCP) Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=56583&t=54481 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
2610 801.Q Trunks [7:54481]
I thought 802.1Q trunking is only supported on FastEthernet interfaces, not Ehternet interfaces. I was able to create 802.1Q trunks on 2610 router with ethernet interface. Does someone know exactlly what version of IOS support 802.1Q trunks on 2610 routers? Thanks Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=54481&t=54481 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Passed Lab 8/23 in RTP, selling much equipment, 2621, 2610, [7:52564]
Teltone ISDN Demonstrator (U interfaces only) in original box with floppy disk. (probably not original power cord, though, as they are generally fungible) $1,200 plus $15 flat shipping for FEDEX 2nd Day Shipping to continental US. 2x NM-1V plus 2x VIC-2FXS. Original owner and original packaging, anti-static wrist strap, manuals. $1,200 for all plus $20 flat shipping for Fedex Ground (will probably be two separate parcels). Cisco 2621 router loaded with 64 megs RAM and 16 megs Flash, a WIC-1T, and a WIC-1BU. No plastic face plate. Comes with rack mount ears. Look at commercial practice labs and see how useful this particular configuration is. $1,350 plus $10 flat shipping for FEDEX Ground. Package of TWO (2) routers for one good price: Cisco 2610 router loaded with 48 megs RAM, 16 megs flash, a WIC-1T, and a WIC-1BU. No blank plate for the NM slot. A very useful configuration. PLUS a Cisco 2501 Ethernet router with 16 megs Flash and 16 megs RAM. The 2610 comes with rackmount ears. The 2500 comes with an AUI-10BT transceiver. $900 for both plus $15 flat shipping (for both together) for Fedex Ground to Continental US. Cisco 2613 router with 48 megs RAM, and 16 megs Flash, and an included NM-4A/S with handle (so it can serve as a frame switch, but it would be kind of expensive to use it just for that all the time). Token ring router, unfortunately, but it holds network modules just as well as any other 2600 series (BTW, be careful that you check out which NMs can go in a 2600. Some only go in 3600s.). Also comes with rackmount ears. Missing one small filler plate where a WIC goes. $645 plus $10 flat shipping shipping for Fedex Ground to Continental US. Cisco 2514 dual ethernet router with 16 megs Flash and 16 megs RAM. $350 plus $10 flat shipping for FEDEX GROUND to continental US. Cisco 2504 token ring and ISDN router, 16 megs Flash, 16 megs RAM. $200 plus $10 flat rate shipping for FEDEX GROUND to continental US. Cisco 2504 token ring and ISDN router, 16 megs Flash, 16 megs RAM. $200 plus $10 flat rate shipping for FEDEX GROUND shipping to continental US. Cisco 2501 router with 16 megs flash and 16 megs RAM. $250 plus $10 flat shipping for FEDEX GROUND shipping to continental US. AT&T NT1. Small, and does not require a power supply, which makes it very convenient. $30 plus $5 fixed shipping. Adtran ACE NT1, in original box with manual and power supply. $30 plus $5 fixed shipping. One NM-4A/S. $325 plus flat $7 shipping. Paypal welcomed. Checks are also welcome but will slow things down a bit. Software licensing is the responsibility of the purchaser. All equipment is guaranteed non-DOA. I plan to only ship to continental US. Thomas P. Larus CCIE # 10,014 540-368-2601 Fredericksburg, VA Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=52564&t=52564 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 2610 VPN with 3DES [7:52124]
I would probably look at 12.1.16. It is GD and should be stable. IP Plus IPSec 3DES only requires 8 and 40 so you should be fine. If you are feeling brave you could load up 12.2.10b.. :) Tim CCIE 9015, CSS1 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Firesox Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2002 8:12 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: 2610 VPN with 3DES [7:52124] Folks, I am in need of a quick help. I have 2610 doing 3DES for site-to-site VPN. It creates a tunnel successfully, but it crashes and gives me an error messgage below. *** System received a SIGTRAP exception *** signal= 0x5, code= 0xd00, context= 0x81640a98 PC = 0x80db4414, Vector = 0xd00, SP = 0x81cfb1f0 *** Unexpected Console FIFO timeout interrupt *** PC = 0xfff03fc4, Vector = 0x500, SP = 0x81641ca4 The IOS is C2600 Software (C2600-IK2S-M), Version 12.0(7)XK1, EARLY DEPLOYMENT RELEASE I have 16MB flash and 48mb Dram. I am suspecting this is a bug within the IOS. If so, can someone tell me what the most bug-free IOS(3DES) is? Thanks Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=52129&t=52124 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
2610 VPN with 3DES [7:52124]
Folks, I am in need of a quick help. I have 2610 doing 3DES for site-to-site VPN. It creates a tunnel successfully, but it crashes and gives me an error messgage below. *** System received a SIGTRAP exception *** signal= 0x5, code= 0xd00, context= 0x81640a98 PC = 0x80db4414, Vector = 0xd00, SP = 0x81cfb1f0 *** Unexpected Console FIFO timeout interrupt *** PC = 0xfff03fc4, Vector = 0x500, SP = 0x81641ca4 The IOS is C2600 Software (C2600-IK2S-M), Version 12.0(7)XK1, EARLY DEPLOYMENT RELEASE I have 16MB flash and 48mb Dram. I am suspecting this is a bug within the IOS. If so, can someone tell me what the most bug-free IOS(3DES) is? Thanks Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=52124&t=52124 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 2610 router performance with NM-HDV-1T1-24 [7:51109]
We used NM-HDV-2T1-48 no problem. The module on board DSP does most of processing, so main CPU is free to do others. Zhen Cai www.shakespearenetwork.com Cisco IP Telephony Hands-on Training -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Osama Kamal Sent: Friday, August 09, 2002 3:59 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: 2610 router performance with NM-HDV-1T1-24 [7:51109] Does anybody know if there will be performance problems when using 2610 router with T1 voice card with 24 channel? I know it is supported, but i want to be sure about performance issues. Thanks Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=51117&t=51109 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
2610 router performance with NM-HDV-1T1-24 [7:51109]
Does anybody know if there will be performance problems when using 2610 router with T1 voice card with 24 channel? I know it is supported, but i want to be sure about performance issues. Thanks Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=51109&t=51109 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OT: 2610 w/ENTERPRISE/FW/IDS PLUS IPSEC 3DES IOS a [7:43952]
All, In my tireless effort to reconfigure my home lab and fund my further education, I am offering this very nice Cisco 2610 router for sale. It comes with: 48mb RAM 16mb Flash 12.2(7b)ENTERPRISE/FW/IDS PLUS IPSEC 3DES IOS 1 WIC-1T Rackmount kit http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll? ViewItem&item=2023741472 It is on eBay, item number 2023741472 I'll eat the shipping charges for anyone who uses "Buy It Now". Thanks, and sorry for the interuption! -Ds Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=43952&t=43952 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
2 2501 and 2610 for sale [7:42421]
Hello, I have 2 2501's and a 2610 all with the lastest ios (12.x) for sale. All are in great condition. also comes with a DTE/DCE cable for frame simulation pwer cords and transceiver's. All for $950. If intrested email me at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=42421&t=42421 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Available Bandwidth on 2610 [7:41586]
You can change it with "max-reserved-bandwidth" command. ""Manuel Pajares"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Cisco routers reserve 25% (this value can be changed, but is not > recommended)for routing, layer 2, etc. traffic. You can use the rest (75%) > when configuring QoS. > > > >From: "Mark Rumfield" > >Reply-To: "Mark Rumfield" > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Subject: Available Bandwidth on 2610 [7:41586] > >Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2002 08:16:35 -0400 > > > > > I have a 2610 with 3 serial interfaces. All 3 are point-to-point T1's. > > > When you do a sho int, it shows bandwidth as 1544 Kbit, but it shows > > > available bandwidth as 1158Kbit, no matter what the current load on the > > > interface is. Routing protocal is OSPF. > > > > > > What does this really mean? And/or how is this available bandwidth > > > determined? > > > > > > > > > > > > Serial1/0 is up, line protocol is up > > > Hardware is DSCC4 with integrated T1 CSU/DSU > > > Description: PTP to MB-West > > > Internet address is 10.32.1.37/30 > > > MTU 1500 bytes, BW 1544 Kbit, DLY 2 usec, > > > reliability 255/255, txload 1/255, rxload 1/255 > > > Encapsulation HDLC, loopback not set > > > Keepalive set (10 sec) > > > Last input 00:00:02, output 00:00:02, output hang never > > > Last clearing of "show interface" counters 8w5d > > > Input queue: 0/75/0/0 (size/max/drops/flushes); Total output drops: 0 > > > Queueing strategy: weighted fair > > > Output queue: 0/1000/64/0 (size/max total/threshold/drops) > > > Conversations 0/10/256 (active/max active/max total) > > > Reserved Conversations 0/0 (allocated/max allocated) > > > Available Bandwidth 1158 kilobits/sec > > > 5 minute input rate 0 bits/sec, 0 packets/sec > > > 5 minute output rate 0 bits/sec, 0 packets/sec > > > 53324797 packets input, 1426721882 bytes, 0 no buffer > > > Received 622749 broadcasts, 0 runts, 4 giants, 0 throttles > > > 16 input errors, 1 CRC, 9 frame, 0 overrun, 0 ignored, 0 abort > > > 53203873 packets output, 3470780381 bytes, 0 underruns > > > 0 output errors, 0 collisions, 1 interface resets > > > 0 output buffer failures, 0 output buffers swapped out > > > 2 carrier transitions > > > DCD=up DSR=up DTR=up RTS=up CTS=up > > > > > > > > > Thanks in advance! > > > > > > > > > Mark Rumfield > > > Network Engineer > > > Enterprise Products > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ > MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: > http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41608&t=41586 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Available Bandwidth on 2610 [7:41586]
Cisco routers reserve 25% (this value can be changed, but is not recommended)for routing, layer 2, etc. traffic. You can use the rest (75%) when configuring QoS. >From: "Mark Rumfield" >Reply-To: "Mark Rumfield" >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Available Bandwidth on 2610 [7:41586] >Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2002 08:16:35 -0400 > > > I have a 2610 with 3 serial interfaces. All 3 are point-to-point T1's. > > When you do a sho int, it shows bandwidth as 1544 Kbit, but it shows > > available bandwidth as 1158Kbit, no matter what the current load on the > > interface is. Routing protocal is OSPF. > > > > What does this really mean? And/or how is this available bandwidth > > determined? > > > > > > > > Serial1/0 is up, line protocol is up > > Hardware is DSCC4 with integrated T1 CSU/DSU > > Description: PTP to MB-West > > Internet address is 10.32.1.37/30 > > MTU 1500 bytes, BW 1544 Kbit, DLY 2 usec, > > reliability 255/255, txload 1/255, rxload 1/255 > > Encapsulation HDLC, loopback not set > > Keepalive set (10 sec) > > Last input 00:00:02, output 00:00:02, output hang never > > Last clearing of "show interface" counters 8w5d > > Input queue: 0/75/0/0 (size/max/drops/flushes); Total output drops: 0 > > Queueing strategy: weighted fair > > Output queue: 0/1000/64/0 (size/max total/threshold/drops) > > Conversations 0/10/256 (active/max active/max total) > > Reserved Conversations 0/0 (allocated/max allocated) > > Available Bandwidth 1158 kilobits/sec > > 5 minute input rate 0 bits/sec, 0 packets/sec > > 5 minute output rate 0 bits/sec, 0 packets/sec > > 53324797 packets input, 1426721882 bytes, 0 no buffer > > Received 622749 broadcasts, 0 runts, 4 giants, 0 throttles > > 16 input errors, 1 CRC, 9 frame, 0 overrun, 0 ignored, 0 abort > > 53203873 packets output, 3470780381 bytes, 0 underruns > > 0 output errors, 0 collisions, 1 interface resets > > 0 output buffer failures, 0 output buffers swapped out > > 2 carrier transitions > > DCD=up DSR=up DTR=up RTS=up CTS=up > > > > > > Thanks in advance! > > > > > > Mark Rumfield > > Network Engineer > > Enterprise Products > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41589&t=41586 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Available Bandwidth on 2610 [7:41586]
> I have a 2610 with 3 serial interfaces. All 3 are point-to-point T1's. > When you do a sho int, it shows bandwidth as 1544 Kbit, but it shows > available bandwidth as 1158Kbit, no matter what the current load on the > interface is. Routing protocal is OSPF. > > What does this really mean? And/or how is this available bandwidth > determined? > > > > Serial1/0 is up, line protocol is up > Hardware is DSCC4 with integrated T1 CSU/DSU > Description: PTP to MB-West > Internet address is 10.32.1.37/30 > MTU 1500 bytes, BW 1544 Kbit, DLY 2 usec, > reliability 255/255, txload 1/255, rxload 1/255 > Encapsulation HDLC, loopback not set > Keepalive set (10 sec) > Last input 00:00:02, output 00:00:02, output hang never > Last clearing of "show interface" counters 8w5d > Input queue: 0/75/0/0 (size/max/drops/flushes); Total output drops: 0 > Queueing strategy: weighted fair > Output queue: 0/1000/64/0 (size/max total/threshold/drops) > Conversations 0/10/256 (active/max active/max total) > Reserved Conversations 0/0 (allocated/max allocated) > Available Bandwidth 1158 kilobits/sec > 5 minute input rate 0 bits/sec, 0 packets/sec > 5 minute output rate 0 bits/sec, 0 packets/sec > 53324797 packets input, 1426721882 bytes, 0 no buffer > Received 622749 broadcasts, 0 runts, 4 giants, 0 throttles > 16 input errors, 1 CRC, 9 frame, 0 overrun, 0 ignored, 0 abort > 53203873 packets output, 3470780381 bytes, 0 underruns > 0 output errors, 0 collisions, 1 interface resets > 0 output buffer failures, 0 output buffers swapped out > 2 carrier transitions > DCD=up DSR=up DTR=up RTS=up CTS=up > > > Thanks in advance! > > > Mark Rumfield > Network Engineer > Enterprise Products > [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41586&t=41586 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 2620 or 2610 [7:40603]
Sounds like a 2620 motherboard with a 2610 case. If the show ver says 2620 and the interface configuration is for a fast ethernet interface, then my money says you've got a 2620. thanks, -Brad Ellis CCIE#5796 (R&S / Security) Network Learning Inc [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.optsys.net (Cisco hardware) ""brian kastor"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > ok, here is one I have never heard. > > Router says 2610 on it. Sh ver says 2620. Router has ethernet interface > (it says 2610), but ios makes you configure a f0/0 interface. > > Mac address for interface is 0002.16f8.2380 > > I can find out through and oui serach that 000216 is cisco, but does anybody > know how to check the last 6 or has anyone else seen this issue? Unless my > jedi training is incorrect, don't 261x's only have 10mb interfaces?? > > thanks, > bk Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=40608&t=40603 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 2620 or 2610 [7:40603]
Sounds like someone put a 2620 board in a 2610 case. Your gain. Craig At 10:45 AM 4/5/2002 -0500, you wrote: >ok, here is one I have never heard. > >Router says 2610 on it. Sh ver says 2620. Router has ethernet interface >(it says 2610), but ios makes you configure a f0/0 interface. > >Mac address for interface is 0002.16f8.2380 > >I can find out through and oui serach that 000216 is cisco, but does anybody >know how to check the last 6 or has anyone else seen this issue? Unless my >jedi training is incorrect, don't 261x's only have 10mb interfaces?? > >thanks, >bk Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=40623&t=40603 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
2620 or 2610 [7:40603]
ok, here is one I have never heard. Router says 2610 on it. Sh ver says 2620. Router has ethernet interface (it says 2610), but ios makes you configure a f0/0 interface. Mac address for interface is 0002.16f8.2380 I can find out through and oui serach that 000216 is cisco, but does anybody know how to check the last 6 or has anyone else seen this issue? Unless my jedi training is incorrect, don't 261x's only have 10mb interfaces?? thanks, bk Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=40603&t=40603 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: routing between vlans in 2900 throuh external 2610? [7:39725]
In some releases of the IOS you can't place the native VLAN on a subinterface. Remove the subinterface you have for VLAN1 and put the VLAN1 IP address on the major interface like this: interface Fastethernet0/0 ip address 10.1.1.1 255.255.255.0 interface Fastethernet0/0 encapsulation dot1q 2 (or is that encapsulation 2 dot1q ?) ip address 10.2.2.1 255.255.255.0 You get the idea. HTH, John On Wed, 27 Mar 2002, cage ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > when routing between vlans in 2900 throuh sub-ethernet of external 2610, > except the vlan1 all other vlans can communicate each other, why? I used > the > 802.1q encapsulation. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=39725&t=39725 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
routing between vlans in 2900 throuh external 2610? [7:39723]
when routing between vlans in 2900 throuh sub-ethernet of external 2610, except the vlan1 all other vlans can communicate each other, why? I used the 802.1q encapsulation. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=39723&t=39723 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
2610 with VIC BRI S/T TE... [7:35604]
Hi everybody;I configured a 2610 router with VIC-BRI S/T TE and NM-2V voice module for VoIP applications.The router runs with IOS c2600-is-mz.120-7.XK1. But I could not achived to make voice call with remote site. Actually when I dial my local number I get too high dial tone and could not dial remote site, vice-versa...The configuration is like below... ! interface BRI1/0 no ip address no ip directed-broadcast isdn switch-type basic-net3 isdn incoming-voice voice isdn sending-complete isdn static-tei 0 !voice-port 1/0/0 ! voice-port 1/0/1 ! dial-peer voice 1 pots destination-pattern 201 port 1/0/0 prefix 0 ! dial-peer voice 2 pots destination-pattern 202 port 1/0/1 ! dial-peer voice 10 voip destination-pattern 101 session target ipv4:X.X.X.X! Thanks alot...Murat EMEL Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: Click Here Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=35604&t=35604 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
2610 router and Video Conf. [7:31544]
I am looking for some help in configuring my 2610 router for video conferencing and to set it up as an gateway/gatekeeper for multiple video conferences. I am presently researching on my own but would love to have experience from others. Thank you Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31544&t=31544 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Analog and Digital Calls on 2610 [7:23101]
Sorry, you can't. Not with a 2600. You need to move up to something like a 3600 or, preferably an AS5x00. The reason is simple. The 2600 has only a NM slot. You are already taking up that slot with either your PRI, or your E-1 R-2 CAS. But to also serve analog calls, you need a modem NM, in order to demodulate the analog signals. So basically, you need 2 NM's - one for your PRI or CAS, and the other for your modems. Unfortunately, a 2600 can only handle 1 NM. ""Swapnil Jain"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > nobody to answer my query > > Swapnil Jain > > ""Swapnil Jain"" wrote in message > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > Dear Friends, > > > > I am already using 2610 with PRI NM as a ISDN Access Server. I also want > to > > use it as a Access Server for PSTN analog dialup lines. Can i do this by > > replacing PRI line with E1 R2 line. or what else i have to do > > > > > > Warm Regards > > > > Swapnil Jain > > Project Consultant > > Digitec Engineers & Computech Pvt Ltd > > Ph: +91-731-533455 / 268851 > > Fax: +91-731-435701 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=23983&t=23101 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Analog and Digital Calls on 2610 [7:23101]
nobody to answer my query Swapnil Jain ""Swapnil Jain"" wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Dear Friends, > > I am already using 2610 with PRI NM as a ISDN Access Server. I also want to > use it as a Access Server for PSTN analog dialup lines. Can i do this by > replacing PRI line with E1 R2 line. or what else i have to do > > > Warm Regards > > Swapnil Jain > Project Consultant > Digitec Engineers & Computech Pvt Ltd > Ph: +91-731-533455 / 268851 > Fax: +91-731-435701 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=23865&t=23101 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 2610 Router for sale [7:17984]
what price have you fixed for that Warm Regards Swapnil Jain (CNE,MCSE,CCNA,CCDA) Project Consultant Digitec Engineers & Computech Pvt Ltd Ph: +91-731-533455 / 268851 Fax: +91-731-435701 ""Terence"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hey Guys/Girls, > I have 3 2610 Cisco routers for sale. They are in great condition. Was > used at a client site that were replaced with 3600 series routers. Here is > the spec's: > > Cisco Internetwork Operating System Software > IOS (tm) C2600 Software (C2600-D-M), Version 12.0(5)T1, RELEASE SOFTWARE > (fc1) > Copyright (c) 1986-1999 by cisco Systems, Inc. > Compiled Tue 17-Aug-99 13:11 by cmong > Image text-base: 0x80008088, data-base: 0x80859E60 > > ROM: System Bootstrap, Version 11.3(2)XA4, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1) > > Router uptime is 0 minutes > System returned to ROM by power-on > System image file is "flash:c2600-d-mz.120-5.T1.bin" > > cisco 2610 (MPC860) processor (revision 0x202) with 26624K/6144K bytes of > memory > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=18178&t=17984 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 2610 Router for sale [7:17984]
Sorry, Leigh Anne... I meant to send this to the group I got one that I made up, but it's one you have to say out loud for it to make sense... How much money do you have if you're running spanning-tree over fiber distributed data interface? Tree FDDI. :) -Original Message- From: Leigh Anne Chisholm [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2001 7:57 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: 2610 Router for sale [7:17984] Hey... if a router has a "D-MZ" image on it, does that mean it's got the firewall feature set? R-R-R! Oh I'm just such a commedienne today! (-: > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > Terence > Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2001 5:42 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: 2610 Router for sale [7:17984] > > > Hey Guys/Girls, > I have 3 2610 Cisco routers for sale. They are in great condition. Was > used at a client site that were replaced with 3600 series routers. Here is > the spec's: > > Cisco Internetwork Operating System Software > IOS (tm) C2600 Software (C2600-D-M), Version 12.0(5)T1, RELEASE SOFTWARE > (fc1) > Copyright (c) 1986-1999 by cisco Systems, Inc. > Compiled Tue 17-Aug-99 13:11 by cmong > Image text-base: 0x80008088, data-base: 0x80859E60 > > ROM: System Bootstrap, Version 11.3(2)XA4, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1) > > Router uptime is 0 minutes > System returned to ROM by power-on > System image file is "flash:c2600-d-mz.120-5.T1.bin" > > cisco 2610 (MPC860) processor (revision 0x202) with 26624K/6144K bytes of > memory > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=18139&t=17984 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 2610 Router for sale [7:17984]
Hey... if a router has a "D-MZ" image on it, does that mean it's got the firewall feature set? R-R-R! Oh I'm just such a commedienne today! (-: > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > Terence > Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2001 5:42 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: 2610 Router for sale [7:17984] > > > Hey Guys/Girls, > I have 3 2610 Cisco routers for sale. They are in great condition. Was > used at a client site that were replaced with 3600 series routers. Here is > the spec's: > > Cisco Internetwork Operating System Software > IOS (tm) C2600 Software (C2600-D-M), Version 12.0(5)T1, RELEASE SOFTWARE > (fc1) > Copyright (c) 1986-1999 by cisco Systems, Inc. > Compiled Tue 17-Aug-99 13:11 by cmong > Image text-base: 0x80008088, data-base: 0x80859E60 > > ROM: System Bootstrap, Version 11.3(2)XA4, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1) > > Router uptime is 0 minutes > System returned to ROM by power-on > System image file is "flash:c2600-d-mz.120-5.T1.bin" > > cisco 2610 (MPC860) processor (revision 0x202) with 26624K/6144K bytes of > memory > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=17987&t=17984 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
2610 Router for sale [7:17984]
Hey Guys/Girls, I have 3 2610 Cisco routers for sale. They are in great condition. Was used at a client site that were replaced with 3600 series routers. Here is the spec's: Cisco Internetwork Operating System Software IOS (tm) C2600 Software (C2600-D-M), Version 12.0(5)T1, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1) Copyright (c) 1986-1999 by cisco Systems, Inc. Compiled Tue 17-Aug-99 13:11 by cmong Image text-base: 0x80008088, data-base: 0x80859E60 ROM: System Bootstrap, Version 11.3(2)XA4, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1) Router uptime is 0 minutes System returned to ROM by power-on System image file is "flash:c2600-d-mz.120-5.T1.bin" cisco 2610 (MPC860) processor (revision 0x202) with 26624K/6144K bytes of memory FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Error in console port - Cisco 2610 , no keyboard sensing ?? [7:16304]
Try to change the flowcontrol from hardware to none on your hyper terminal. Hth, Ole ~~~ Ole Drews Jensen Systems Network Manager CCNA, MCSE, MCP+I RWR Enterprises, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~~~ http://www.RouterChief.com ~~~ NEED A JOB ??? http://www.oledrews.com/job ~~~ -Original Message- From: NKP [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 11:02 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Error in console port - Cisco 2610 , no keyboard sensing ?? [7:16299] Hi , I am facing an error in my Cisco 2610 , as soon as I swictch on my router and connect my console port to the serial port of my computer , the flash loads itself perfectly , but the console port is not accepting any commands from the keyboard at all . ALl the interfaces of the router are working perfectly as it shows the interface as coming up . I am not able to break into the console port and some to the rommon mode as well . I have checked the flash and the RAM , they both are working fine , the problem seems to be of the console port not accepting any command from the keyboard , the problem is coming with the hyper terminal of other computers as well on connecting with this router . Please guide me how I may proceed with fixing this issue ?? thanks, Navin Parwal Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=16304&t=16304 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Error in console port - Cisco 2610 , no keyboard sensing ?? [7:16299]
Hi , I am facing an error in my Cisco 2610 , as soon as I swictch on my router and connect my console port to the serial port of my computer , the flash loads itself perfectly , but the console port is not accepting any commands from the keyboard at all . ALl the interfaces of the router are working perfectly as it shows the interface as coming up . I am not able to break into the console port and some to the rommon mode as well . I have checked the flash and the RAM , they both are working fine , the problem seems to be of the console port not accepting any command from the keyboard , the problem is coming with the hyper terminal of other computers as well on connecting with this router . Please guide me how I may proceed with fixing this issue ?? thanks, Navin Parwal Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=16299&t=16299 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: NM-2W (no Lan) for 2610, Is it supported ? [7:15563]
sometimes, searching cco is the best place to find an answer if you simply enter nm-2w 2600 into the search window brings you to this: http://www-search.cisco.com/pcgi-bin/search/public.pl?q=nm-2w+%3Cand%3E+2600&num=10&searchselector=0 which, as you look at the first hit http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios120/relnote/2600ser/rn26007k.htm and click on new hardware features shows this: New Product Numbers: NM-2W (Cisco 2600 and 3600 series) "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" wrote: > Hi group !! > > Can someone pls tell me if the NM-2W Module (w no Lan) is supported on > the 2610 ??? > > If so, I have an NM-1E (for 3600 series) module that i'm looking to > possibly trade for the > > NM-2w, for a 2610. > > Thanks in advance.. > > Randy > Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=15574&t=15563 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: NM-2W (no Lan) for 2610, Is it supported ? [7:15563]
Yes, it is supported. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2001 9:09 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: NM-2W (no Lan) for 2610, Is it supported ? [7:15563] Hi group !! Can someone pls tell me if the NM-2W Module (w no Lan) is supported on the 2610 ??? If so, I have an NM-1E (for 3600 series) module that i'm looking to possibly trade for the NM-2w, for a 2610. Thanks in advance.. Randy GET INTERNET ACCESS FROM JUNO! Juno offers FREE or PREMIUM Internet access for less! Join Juno today! For your FREE software, visit: http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagj. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=15565&t=15563 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
NM-2W (no Lan) for 2610, Is it supported ? [7:15563]
Hi group !! Can someone pls tell me if the NM-2W Module (w no Lan) is supported on the 2610 ??? If so, I have an NM-1E (for 3600 series) module that i'm looking to possibly trade for the NM-2w, for a 2610. Thanks in advance.. Randy GET INTERNET ACCESS FROM JUNO! Juno offers FREE or PREMIUM Internet access for less! Join Juno today! For your FREE software, visit: http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagj. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=15563&t=15563 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Problem with Fastethernet 2610 router [7:13497]
Kiran Why don't you try by turing off routing ( no ip routing) and just specify a default-gateway on your 2621. Test the connection again. I have seen this problem where if you specified a default-gateway plus a default route, most likely you will not able to access anything outside it subnet. Tu ""Kiran Kumar M"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > On Tue, 24 Jul 2001, Farhan Ahmed wrote: > > > WHAT DO u mean by another router with ethernet card > > I have 5 Cisco routers with me. Out of that two are in real network, and > three or spare. I am facing problem with 2620 only, If I replace this > router with other router, it is not giving any problem.. > > Kiran > > > > nd unable to ping to other VLANS or outside of that VLAN. If I use > > > > another router with ethernet card (becuase I am not having another > > > > ethernet card in first router), > > -Original Message- > > From: Kiran Kumar M [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2001 10:40 PM > > To: Farhan Ahmed > > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: RE: Problem with Fastethernet 2610 router [7:13497] > > > > > > > > It is not at all the routing problem. Because it is perfectly working with > > the same configuration with other router with out any changes. > > > > Thanks, > > Kiran > > On Tue, 24 Jul 2001, Farhan Ahmed wrote: > > > > > u need to setup static route in both direction u just put only 1 route to > > > the 1st vlan u need more rotes in both direc > > > on the other vlans u should have static routes to router via x > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Kiran Kumar M [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2001 10:28 PM > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Subject: Re: Problem with Fastethernet 2610 router [7:13497] > > > > > > > > > Thanks for your mail. > > > > > > No, the default route is already there. It is already defined in that > > > router. Infact I just copied it from the working router. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Kiran > > > > > > > > > On Tue, 24 Jul 2001, Patrick Ramsey wrote: > > > > > > > sounds like you have missed a default route on the 2610. > > > > > > > > The 2610 will not be able to see any other vlans unless the vlan it is > > > plugged into has an ip address assigned to it acting as a "gateway". > Then > > > you need to set that ip address as the 2610's default gateway. (or at > > least > > > specify a specific route to the other vlans) > > > > > > > > If this is a router conencted to the internet, you would defiantely > want > > > to keep the default gw out it's serial interface. > > > > > > > > -Patrick > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> "Kiran Kumar M" 07/24/01 10:27AM >>> > > > > Hai, > > > > > > > > I am facing a strange problem. I am using a cisco 2610 router in my > > > > network. In that I am having one fastethernet, and 2 WIC2T . When I am > > > > connecting to the L3 switch, it is able to ping to that particular > VLAN, > > > > and unable to ping to other VLANS or outside of that VLAN. If I use > > > > another router with ethernet card (becuase I am not having another > > > > ethernet card in first router), with the same setup it is able to > > > > communicate with the outside world. So I concluded that it is not the > > > > problem with L3 switch. I tried to find it on cisco site, but unable to > > > > locate the solution. > > > > > > > > Thanks in advance, > > > > Kiran Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13682&t=13497 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Problem with Fastethernet 2610 router [7:13497]
On Tue, 24 Jul 2001, Farhan Ahmed wrote: > WHAT DO u mean by another router with ethernet card I have 5 Cisco routers with me. Out of that two are in real network, and three or spare. I am facing problem with 2620 only, If I replace this router with other router, it is not giving any problem.. Kiran > nd unable to ping to other VLANS or outside of that VLAN. If I use > > > another router with ethernet card (becuase I am not having another > > > ethernet card in first router), > -Original Message- > From: Kiran Kumar M [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2001 10:40 PM > To: Farhan Ahmed > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Problem with Fastethernet 2610 router [7:13497] > > > > It is not at all the routing problem. Because it is perfectly working with > the same configuration with other router with out any changes. > > Thanks, > Kiran > On Tue, 24 Jul 2001, Farhan Ahmed wrote: > > > u need to setup static route in both direction u just put only 1 route to > > the 1st vlan u need more rotes in both direc > > on the other vlans u should have static routes to router via x > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Kiran Kumar M [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2001 10:28 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: Problem with Fastethernet 2610 router [7:13497] > > > > > > Thanks for your mail. > > > > No, the default route is already there. It is already defined in that > > router. Infact I just copied it from the working router. > > > > Thanks, > > Kiran > > > > > > On Tue, 24 Jul 2001, Patrick Ramsey wrote: > > > > > sounds like you have missed a default route on the 2610. > > > > > > The 2610 will not be able to see any other vlans unless the vlan it is > > plugged into has an ip address assigned to it acting as a "gateway". Then > > you need to set that ip address as the 2610's default gateway. (or at > least > > specify a specific route to the other vlans) > > > > > > If this is a router conencted to the internet, you would defiantely want > > to keep the default gw out it's serial interface. > > > > > > -Patrick > > > > > > > > > >>> "Kiran Kumar M" 07/24/01 10:27AM >>> > > > Hai, > > > > > > I am facing a strange problem. I am using a cisco 2610 router in my > > > network. In that I am having one fastethernet, and 2 WIC2T . When I am > > > connecting to the L3 switch, it is able to ping to that particular VLAN, > > > and unable to ping to other VLANS or outside of that VLAN. If I use > > > another router with ethernet card (becuase I am not having another > > > ethernet card in first router), with the same setup it is able to > > > communicate with the outside world. So I concluded that it is not the > > > problem with L3 switch. I tried to find it on cisco site, but unable to > > > locate the solution. > > > > > > Thanks in advance, > > > Kiran Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13580&t=13497 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Problem with Fastethernet 2610 router [7:13497]
nothing wrong but its illogical same route pointing to one host none of them will work if that host is down so there is no point of safe side.. right? -Original Message- From: Kiran Kumar M [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2001 11:12 PM To: Farhan Ahmed Subject: RE: Problem with Fastethernet 2610 router [7:13497] Here right now I am testing on only one interface, imagine If I have 10 WAN and 2 ethernet.. Then This kind of setting will be useful. We generally follow it, so it was there.. What is the wrong in that ? On Tue, 24 Jul 2001, Farhan Ahmed wrote: > what do u mean by safe side? > > -Original Message- > From: Kiran Kumar M [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2001 11:04 PM > To: Farhan Ahmed > Subject: RE: Problem with Fastethernet 2610 router [7:13497] > > > > Nothing Actually second line is not required if we are defining the > first. But it was defined on safe side.. some time we remove the routing > after incresing the links.. > > Thanks, > Kiran > > > On Tue, 24 Jul 2001, Farhan Ahmed wrote: > > > whats the diff bw these 2 > > ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.2.1 > > ip route 192.168.2.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.2.1 > > ! > > -Original Message- > > From: Kiran Kumar M [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2001 10:57 PM > > To: Farhan Ahmed > > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: RE: Problem with Fastethernet 2610 router [7:13497] > > > > > > > > Sure. It is very simple configuration. > > > > 2610 Router: > > > > Current configuration: > > ! > > version 12.0 > > service timestamps debug uptime > > service timestamps log uptime > > no service password-encryption > > ! > > hostname Router > > ! > > enable secret 5 x > > enable password > > ! > > ip subnet-zero > > ip domain-name xx.xxx > > ip name-server xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx > > ! > > ! > > interface Loopback0 > > no ip address > > no ip directed-broadcast > > ! > > interface Ethernet0/0 > > ip address 192.168.2.2 255.255.255.0 > > no ip directed-broadcast > > ! > > interface Serial0/0 > > no ip directed-broadcast > > encapsulation ppp > > no ip route-cache > > no ip mroute-cache > > shutdown > > ! > > interface Serial0/1 > > ip address 192.168.1.61 255.255.255.252 > > no ip directed-broadcast > > encapsulation ppp > > no ip route-cache > > no ip mroute-cache > > ! > > ip classless > > ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.2.1 > > ip route 192.168.2.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.2.1 > > ! > > ! > > ! > > line con 0 > > transport input none > > line aux 0 > > line vty 0 4 > > password xx > > login > > ! > > end > > > > Here I replaced the passwords and IP address ( Actually I am using public > > IP address, here I mention the private IP addresses). > > > > The very same is following on 2620 router also. Except one change. That is > > Ethernet is replaced with Fast ethernet. > > > > Thanks, > > Kiran > > > > > > On Tue, 24 Jul 2001, Farhan Ahmed wrote: > > > > > cAN U SEND YR CONFIGS > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Kiran Kumar M [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2001 10:40 PM > > > To: Farhan Ahmed > > > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Subject: RE: Problem with Fastethernet 2610 router [7:13497] > > > > > > > > > > > > It is not at all the routing problem. Because it is perfectly working > with > > > the same configuration with other router with out any changes. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Kiran > > > On Tue, 24 Jul 2001, Farhan Ahmed wrote: > > > > > > > u need to setup static route in both direction u just put only 1 route > > to > > > > the 1st vlan u need more rotes in both direc > > > > on the other vlans u should have static routes to router via x > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > > From: Kiran Kumar M [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2001 10:28 PM > > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Subject: Re: Problem with Fastethernet 2610 router [7:13497] > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for your mail. > > > > > > > > No, the default rou
RE: Problem with Fastethernet 2610 router [7:13497]
what do u mean by safe side? -Original Message- From: Kiran Kumar M [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2001 11:04 PM To: Farhan Ahmed Subject: RE: Problem with Fastethernet 2610 router [7:13497] Nothing Actually second line is not required if we are defining the first. But it was defined on safe side.. some time we remove the routing after incresing the links.. Thanks, Kiran On Tue, 24 Jul 2001, Farhan Ahmed wrote: > whats the diff bw these 2 > ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.2.1 > ip route 192.168.2.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.2.1 > ! > -Original Message- > From: Kiran Kumar M [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2001 10:57 PM > To: Farhan Ahmed > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Problem with Fastethernet 2610 router [7:13497] > > > > Sure. It is very simple configuration. > > 2610 Router: > > Current configuration: > ! > version 12.0 > service timestamps debug uptime > service timestamps log uptime > no service password-encryption > ! > hostname Router > ! > enable secret 5 x > enable password > ! > ip subnet-zero > ip domain-name xx.xxx > ip name-server xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx > ! > ! > interface Loopback0 > no ip address > no ip directed-broadcast > ! > interface Ethernet0/0 > ip address 192.168.2.2 255.255.255.0 > no ip directed-broadcast > ! > interface Serial0/0 > no ip directed-broadcast > encapsulation ppp > no ip route-cache > no ip mroute-cache > shutdown > ! > interface Serial0/1 > ip address 192.168.1.61 255.255.255.252 > no ip directed-broadcast > encapsulation ppp > no ip route-cache > no ip mroute-cache > ! > ip classless > ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.2.1 > ip route 192.168.2.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.2.1 > ! > ! > ! > line con 0 > transport input none > line aux 0 > line vty 0 4 > password xx > login > ! > end > > Here I replaced the passwords and IP address ( Actually I am using public > IP address, here I mention the private IP addresses). > > The very same is following on 2620 router also. Except one change. That is > Ethernet is replaced with Fast ethernet. > > Thanks, > Kiran > > > On Tue, 24 Jul 2001, Farhan Ahmed wrote: > > > cAN U SEND YR CONFIGS > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Kiran Kumar M [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2001 10:40 PM > > To: Farhan Ahmed > > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: RE: Problem with Fastethernet 2610 router [7:13497] > > > > > > > > It is not at all the routing problem. Because it is perfectly working with > > the same configuration with other router with out any changes. > > > > Thanks, > > Kiran > > On Tue, 24 Jul 2001, Farhan Ahmed wrote: > > > > > u need to setup static route in both direction u just put only 1 route > to > > > the 1st vlan u need more rotes in both direc > > > on the other vlans u should have static routes to router via x > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Kiran Kumar M [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2001 10:28 PM > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Subject: Re: Problem with Fastethernet 2610 router [7:13497] > > > > > > > > > Thanks for your mail. > > > > > > No, the default route is already there. It is already defined in that > > > router. Infact I just copied it from the working router. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Kiran > > > > > > > > > On Tue, 24 Jul 2001, Patrick Ramsey wrote: > > > > > > > sounds like you have missed a default route on the 2610. > > > > > > > > The 2610 will not be able to see any other vlans unless the vlan it is > > > plugged into has an ip address assigned to it acting as a "gateway". > Then > > > you need to set that ip address as the 2610's default gateway. (or at > > least > > > specify a specific route to the other vlans) > > > > > > > > If this is a router conencted to the internet, you would defiantely > want > > > to keep the default gw out it's serial interface. > > > > > > > > -Patrick > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> "Kiran Kumar M" 07/24/01 10:27AM >>> > > > > Hai, > > > > > > > > I am facing a strange problem. I am using a cisco 2610 router in my > > > > network. In that I am
RE: Problem with Fastethernet 2610 router [7:13497]
Sure. It is very simple configuration. 2610 Router: Current configuration: ! version 12.0 service timestamps debug uptime service timestamps log uptime no service password-encryption ! hostname Router ! enable secret 5 x enable password ! ip subnet-zero ip domain-name xx.xxx ip name-server xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx ! ! interface Loopback0 no ip address no ip directed-broadcast ! interface Ethernet0/0 ip address 192.168.2.2 255.255.255.0 no ip directed-broadcast ! interface Serial0/0 no ip directed-broadcast encapsulation ppp no ip route-cache no ip mroute-cache shutdown ! interface Serial0/1 ip address 192.168.1.61 255.255.255.252 no ip directed-broadcast encapsulation ppp no ip route-cache no ip mroute-cache ! ip classless ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.2.1 ip route 192.168.2.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.2.1 ! ! ! line con 0 transport input none line aux 0 line vty 0 4 password xx login ! end Here I replaced the passwords and IP address ( Actually I am using public IP address, here I mention the private IP addresses). The very same is following on 2620 router also. Except one change. That is Ethernet is replaced with Fast ethernet. Thanks, Kiran On Tue, 24 Jul 2001, Farhan Ahmed wrote: > cAN U SEND YR CONFIGS > > -Original Message- > From: Kiran Kumar M [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2001 10:40 PM > To: Farhan Ahmed > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Problem with Fastethernet 2610 router [7:13497] > > > > It is not at all the routing problem. Because it is perfectly working with > the same configuration with other router with out any changes. > > Thanks, > Kiran > On Tue, 24 Jul 2001, Farhan Ahmed wrote: > > > u need to setup static route in both direction u just put only 1 route to > > the 1st vlan u need more rotes in both direc > > on the other vlans u should have static routes to router via x > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Kiran Kumar M [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2001 10:28 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: Problem with Fastethernet 2610 router [7:13497] > > > > > > Thanks for your mail. > > > > No, the default route is already there. It is already defined in that > > router. Infact I just copied it from the working router. > > > > Thanks, > > Kiran > > > > > > On Tue, 24 Jul 2001, Patrick Ramsey wrote: > > > > > sounds like you have missed a default route on the 2610. > > > > > > The 2610 will not be able to see any other vlans unless the vlan it is > > plugged into has an ip address assigned to it acting as a "gateway". Then > > you need to set that ip address as the 2610's default gateway. (or at > least > > specify a specific route to the other vlans) > > > > > > If this is a router conencted to the internet, you would defiantely want > > to keep the default gw out it's serial interface. > > > > > > -Patrick > > > > > > > > > >>> "Kiran Kumar M" 07/24/01 10:27AM >>> > > > Hai, > > > > > > I am facing a strange problem. I am using a cisco 2610 router in my > > > network. In that I am having one fastethernet, and 2 WIC2T . When I am > > > connecting to the L3 switch, it is able to ping to that particular VLAN, > > > and unable to ping to other VLANS or outside of that VLAN. If I use > > > another router with ethernet card (becuase I am not having another > > > ethernet card in first router), with the same setup it is able to > > > communicate with the outside world. So I concluded that it is not the > > > problem with L3 switch. I tried to find it on cisco site, but unable to > > > locate the solution. > > > > > > Thanks in advance, > > > Kiran Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13579&t=13497 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Problem with Fastethernet 2610 router [7:13497]
WHAT DO u mean by another router with ethernet card nd unable to ping to other VLANS or outside of that VLAN. If I use > > another router with ethernet card (becuase I am not having another > > ethernet card in first router), -Original Message- From: Kiran Kumar M [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2001 10:40 PM To: Farhan Ahmed Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Problem with Fastethernet 2610 router [7:13497] It is not at all the routing problem. Because it is perfectly working with the same configuration with other router with out any changes. Thanks, Kiran On Tue, 24 Jul 2001, Farhan Ahmed wrote: > u need to setup static route in both direction u just put only 1 route to > the 1st vlan u need more rotes in both direc > on the other vlans u should have static routes to router via x > > -Original Message- > From: Kiran Kumar M [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2001 10:28 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Problem with Fastethernet 2610 router [7:13497] > > > Thanks for your mail. > > No, the default route is already there. It is already defined in that > router. Infact I just copied it from the working router. > > Thanks, > Kiran > > > On Tue, 24 Jul 2001, Patrick Ramsey wrote: > > > sounds like you have missed a default route on the 2610. > > > > The 2610 will not be able to see any other vlans unless the vlan it is > plugged into has an ip address assigned to it acting as a "gateway". Then > you need to set that ip address as the 2610's default gateway. (or at least > specify a specific route to the other vlans) > > > > If this is a router conencted to the internet, you would defiantely want > to keep the default gw out it's serial interface. > > > > -Patrick > > > > > > >>> "Kiran Kumar M" 07/24/01 10:27AM >>> > > Hai, > > > > I am facing a strange problem. I am using a cisco 2610 router in my > > network. In that I am having one fastethernet, and 2 WIC2T . When I am > > connecting to the L3 switch, it is able to ping to that particular VLAN, > > and unable to ping to other VLANS or outside of that VLAN. If I use > > another router with ethernet card (becuase I am not having another > > ethernet card in first router), with the same setup it is able to > > communicate with the outside world. So I concluded that it is not the > > problem with L3 switch. I tried to find it on cisco site, but unable to > > locate the solution. > > > > Thanks in advance, > > Kiran Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13575&t=13497 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Problem with Fastethernet 2610 router [7:13497]
cAN U SEND YR CONFIGS -Original Message- From: Kiran Kumar M [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2001 10:40 PM To: Farhan Ahmed Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Problem with Fastethernet 2610 router [7:13497] It is not at all the routing problem. Because it is perfectly working with the same configuration with other router with out any changes. Thanks, Kiran On Tue, 24 Jul 2001, Farhan Ahmed wrote: > u need to setup static route in both direction u just put only 1 route to > the 1st vlan u need more rotes in both direc > on the other vlans u should have static routes to router via x > > -Original Message- > From: Kiran Kumar M [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2001 10:28 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Problem with Fastethernet 2610 router [7:13497] > > > Thanks for your mail. > > No, the default route is already there. It is already defined in that > router. Infact I just copied it from the working router. > > Thanks, > Kiran > > > On Tue, 24 Jul 2001, Patrick Ramsey wrote: > > > sounds like you have missed a default route on the 2610. > > > > The 2610 will not be able to see any other vlans unless the vlan it is > plugged into has an ip address assigned to it acting as a "gateway". Then > you need to set that ip address as the 2610's default gateway. (or at least > specify a specific route to the other vlans) > > > > If this is a router conencted to the internet, you would defiantely want > to keep the default gw out it's serial interface. > > > > -Patrick > > > > > > >>> "Kiran Kumar M" 07/24/01 10:27AM >>> > > Hai, > > > > I am facing a strange problem. I am using a cisco 2610 router in my > > network. In that I am having one fastethernet, and 2 WIC2T . When I am > > connecting to the L3 switch, it is able to ping to that particular VLAN, > > and unable to ping to other VLANS or outside of that VLAN. If I use > > another router with ethernet card (becuase I am not having another > > ethernet card in first router), with the same setup it is able to > > communicate with the outside world. So I concluded that it is not the > > problem with L3 switch. I tried to find it on cisco site, but unable to > > locate the solution. > > > > Thanks in advance, > > Kiran Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13574&t=13497 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Problem with Fastethernet 2610 router [7:13497]
It is not at all the routing problem. Because it is perfectly working with the same configuration with other router with out any changes. Thanks, Kiran On Tue, 24 Jul 2001, Farhan Ahmed wrote: > u need to setup static route in both direction u just put only 1 route to > the 1st vlan u need more rotes in both direc > on the other vlans u should have static routes to router via x > > -Original Message- > From: Kiran Kumar M [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2001 10:28 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Problem with Fastethernet 2610 router [7:13497] > > > Thanks for your mail. > > No, the default route is already there. It is already defined in that > router. Infact I just copied it from the working router. > > Thanks, > Kiran > > > On Tue, 24 Jul 2001, Patrick Ramsey wrote: > > > sounds like you have missed a default route on the 2610. > > > > The 2610 will not be able to see any other vlans unless the vlan it is > plugged into has an ip address assigned to it acting as a "gateway". Then > you need to set that ip address as the 2610's default gateway. (or at least > specify a specific route to the other vlans) > > > > If this is a router conencted to the internet, you would defiantely want > to keep the default gw out it's serial interface. > > > > -Patrick > > > > > > >>> "Kiran Kumar M" 07/24/01 10:27AM >>> > > Hai, > > > > I am facing a strange problem. I am using a cisco 2610 router in my > > network. In that I am having one fastethernet, and 2 WIC2T . When I am > > connecting to the L3 switch, it is able to ping to that particular VLAN, > > and unable to ping to other VLANS or outside of that VLAN. If I use > > another router with ethernet card (becuase I am not having another > > ethernet card in first router), with the same setup it is able to > > communicate with the outside world. So I concluded that it is not the > > problem with L3 switch. I tried to find it on cisco site, but unable to > > locate the solution. > > > > Thanks in advance, > > Kiran Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13572&t=13497 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Problem with Fastethernet 2610 router [7:13497]
u need to setup static route in both direction u just put only 1 route to the 1st vlan u need more rotes in both direc on the other vlans u should have static routes to router via x -Original Message- From: Kiran Kumar M [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2001 10:28 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Problem with Fastethernet 2610 router [7:13497] Thanks for your mail. No, the default route is already there. It is already defined in that router. Infact I just copied it from the working router. Thanks, Kiran On Tue, 24 Jul 2001, Patrick Ramsey wrote: > sounds like you have missed a default route on the 2610. > > The 2610 will not be able to see any other vlans unless the vlan it is plugged into has an ip address assigned to it acting as a "gateway". Then you need to set that ip address as the 2610's default gateway. (or at least specify a specific route to the other vlans) > > If this is a router conencted to the internet, you would defiantely want to keep the default gw out it's serial interface. > > -Patrick > > > >>> "Kiran Kumar M" 07/24/01 10:27AM >>> > Hai, > > I am facing a strange problem. I am using a cisco 2610 router in my > network. In that I am having one fastethernet, and 2 WIC2T . When I am > connecting to the L3 switch, it is able to ping to that particular VLAN, > and unable to ping to other VLANS or outside of that VLAN. If I use > another router with ethernet card (becuase I am not having another > ethernet card in first router), with the same setup it is able to > communicate with the outside world. So I concluded that it is not the > problem with L3 switch. I tried to find it on cisco site, but unable to > locate the solution. > > Thanks in advance, > Kiran Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13568&t=13497 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Problem with Fastethernet 2610 router [7:13497]
On Tue, 24 Jul 2001, Peter Slow wrote: > Guys, 261x series routers do NOT have fast ethernet, NOR will they accept > ANY network module w/ a FE interface. > neither will 262x routers, whic have 1 or two FE interfaces built in. > the same goes for 265x. one or two built in, but it it not possible to add > more. Yes it was 2620, not 2610. Sorry for mistake and confusing lot of people. > > i am assuming from your description that there is another router in your > network on that switch. Yes I am having 2 more cisco routers (3660, and 2610) router and some Intel routers (excluding the two routers (2620 and 2610)that I am testing). Cisco routers are connected to L3 switch, and some of the Intel routers are connected to L3 switch (but on different VLANS)and some of them connected on L2 switch. > if this is a true L3 switch, than your 2610 is NOT capable of being an MLS > RP and there must be another one on the network somewhere. But here my second 2610 ( in my question) is perfectly able to communicate with others. > your routers eth. interface will plug into a single VLAN, with an IP route > either static or dynamic to those other VLANs via a next hop, the MLS RP on > your layer three switch. yes.. But I am not sure about MSL RP in my L3 switch ( I am using Extreme networks Layer 3 switch) > this is quite fundamental. is there an entry for the network you are trying > to reach in your routing table. > > I'm goign to take a wild guess here and assume that there is not yet. No it is there, otherwise with the same configuration (my second) router will not be able communicate... > > tell us what kind of "L3 switch" you are using i need to know what equipment > you have, exactly, in this case, in order to help you. It is Extreme Networks Summit Switch. > i do not think that this is a default route probllem at all. Yes. > he is not supposed to be trunking to the switch, he should in this case have > a next hop on the VLAN that is connected to other VLANS, if this is a L3 > switching scenario. > > I also think that what he thinks is a layer 3 switch is not capable of > acting as one, or is not configured correctly. As far as concerning with Layer 3 switch, I am not finding any falut. Becuase it is perfectly working with the same port with the second router. I am only facing the problem when I am connected 2620, with this I am able to ping to that particular VLAN not beyond that. > Kiran, tell us what equipment you have, and what network connections you > have. 2620 Router--> L3switch --> other network If I replace 2620 with 2610, then it is working properly. In L3 Switch I am having 8 VLANS on port base. And I am using static routing in that. Thanks for your detailed mail. Kiran > -Peter > > -Original Message- > From: Patrick Ramsey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2001 10:56 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Problem with Fastethernet 2610 router [7:13497] > > > sounds like you have missed a default route on the 2610. > > The 2610 will not be able to see any other vlans unless the vlan it is > plugged into has an ip address assigned to it acting as a "gateway". Then > you need to set that ip address as the 2610's default gateway. (or at least > specify a specific route to the other vlans) > > If this is a router conencted to the internet, you would defiantely want to > keep the default gw out it's serial interface. > > -Patrick > > > >>> "Kiran Kumar M" 07/24/01 10:27AM >>> > Hai, > > I am facing a strange problem. I am using a cisco 2610 router in my > network. In that I am having one fastethernet, and 2 WIC2T . When I am > connecting to the L3 switch, it is able to ping to that particular VLAN, > and unable to ping to other VLANS or outside of that VLAN. If I use > another router with ethernet card (becuase I am not having another > ethernet card in first router), with the same setup it is able to > communicate with the outside world. So I concluded that it is not the > problem with L3 switch. I tried to find it on cisco site, but unable to > locate the solution. > > Thanks in advance, > Kiran Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13566&t=13497 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Problem with Fastethernet 2610 router [7:13497]
Thanks for your work. But I am sure that it is having the fast ethernet in 2610. And on the interface speed is auto, and duplex is auto. Other side (on switch side) it is also same i.e., both are in auto. I tried after removing the auto option, but it is same situation. Thanks, Kiran On Tue, 24 Jul 2001, John Neiberger wrote: > I am having a lot of trouble interpreting your problem. However, one > thing I noticed is that you say you have a fast ethernet interface on a > 2610 router. According to the quick reference guide, there is no fast > ethernet module available for the 2610. Unless they've come out with > something new, this may be your problem. I'm guessing that you have > your switch set for 100Mbps/full duplex and your router can only do > 10Mbps. > > In addition, not only can you not do 100Mbps/full duplex on a 2610, > that ethernet interface cannot be a trunk port. Those do not support > ISL or 802.1q unless something has changed recently. > > If I'm wrong, someone please correct me. > > Regards, > John > > >>> "Kiran Kumar M" 7/24/01 8:27:12 AM >>> > Hai, > > I am facing a strange problem. I am using a cisco 2610 router in my > network. In that I am having one fastethernet, and 2 WIC2T . When I am > connecting to the L3 switch, it is able to ping to that particular > VLAN, > and unable to ping to other VLANS or outside of that VLAN. If I use > another router with ethernet card (becuase I am not having another > ethernet card in first router), with the same setup it is able to > communicate with the outside world. So I concluded that it is not the > problem with L3 switch. I tried to find it on cisco site, but unable > to > locate the solution. > > Thanks in advance, > Kiran Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13562&t=13497 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Problem with Fastethernet 2610 router [7:13497]
Thanks for your mail. No, the default route is already there. It is already defined in that router. Infact I just copied it from the working router. Thanks, Kiran On Tue, 24 Jul 2001, Patrick Ramsey wrote: > sounds like you have missed a default route on the 2610. > > The 2610 will not be able to see any other vlans unless the vlan it is plugged into has an ip address assigned to it acting as a "gateway". Then you need to set that ip address as the 2610's default gateway. (or at least specify a specific route to the other vlans) > > If this is a router conencted to the internet, you would defiantely want to keep the default gw out it's serial interface. > > -Patrick > > > >>> "Kiran Kumar M" 07/24/01 10:27AM >>> > Hai, > > I am facing a strange problem. I am using a cisco 2610 router in my > network. In that I am having one fastethernet, and 2 WIC2T . When I am > connecting to the L3 switch, it is able to ping to that particular VLAN, > and unable to ping to other VLANS or outside of that VLAN. If I use > another router with ethernet card (becuase I am not having another > ethernet card in first router), with the same setup it is able to > communicate with the outside world. So I concluded that it is not the > problem with L3 switch. I tried to find it on cisco site, but unable to > locate the solution. > > Thanks in advance, > Kiran Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13563&t=13497 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Problem with Fastethernet 2610 router [7:13497]
I am really very sorry for confusing all of you. My first router which is having FE is 2620, and second router is 2610. Sorry again. Thanks, Kiran On Tue, 24 Jul 2001, John Neiberger wrote: > How are you accomplishing this? The 2610 has *no* fast ethernet ports > and there are no fast ethernet modules available. So, with no built-in > 100BaseTX ports and no modules available, where did you get this fast > ethernet interface? > > >>> Kiran Kumar M 7/24/01 11:40:42 AM >>> > Thanks for your work. But I am sure that it is having the fast ethernet > in > 2610. And on the interface speed is auto, and duplex is auto. Other > side > (on switch side) it is also same i.e., both are in auto. I tried > after > removing the auto option, but it is same situation. > > Thanks, > Kiran > > > > > > On Tue, 24 Jul 2001, John Neiberger wrote: > > > I am having a lot of trouble interpreting your problem. However, > one > > thing I noticed is that you say you have a fast ethernet interface on > a > > 2610 router. According to the quick reference guide, there is no > fast > > ethernet module available for the 2610. Unless they've come out > with > > something new, this may be your problem. I'm guessing that you have > > your switch set for 100Mbps/full duplex and your router can only do > > 10Mbps. > > > > In addition, not only can you not do 100Mbps/full duplex on a 2610, > > that ethernet interface cannot be a trunk port. Those do not > support > > ISL or 802.1q unless something has changed recently. > > > > If I'm wrong, someone please correct me. > > > > Regards, > > John > > > > >>> "Kiran Kumar M" 7/24/01 8:27:12 AM >>> > > Hai, > > > > I am facing a strange problem. I am using a cisco 2610 router in my > > network. In that I am having one fastethernet, and 2 WIC2T . When I > am > > connecting to the L3 switch, it is able to ping to that particular > > VLAN, > > and unable to ping to other VLANS or outside of that VLAN. If I use > > another router with ethernet card (becuase I am not having another > > ethernet card in first router), with the same setup it is able to > > communicate with the outside world. So I concluded that it is not > the > > problem with L3 switch. I tried to find it on cisco site, but unable > > to > > locate the solution. > > > > Thanks in advance, > > Kiran > [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13557&t=13497 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Problem with Fastethernet 2610 router [7:13497]
Sorry, I am testing it on 2620 not on 2610. You are correct in 2610 will not be having FE. So in my problem first router is 2620, and the second router is 2610 only. Thanks, Kiran On Tue, 24 Jul 2001, Kiran Kumar M wrote: > Thanks for your work. But I am sure that it is having the fast ethernet in > 2610. And on the interface speed is auto, and duplex is auto. Other side > (on switch side) it is also same i.e., both are in auto. I tried after > removing the auto option, but it is same situation. > > Thanks, > Kiran > > > > > > On Tue, 24 Jul 2001, John Neiberger wrote: > > > I am having a lot of trouble interpreting your problem. However, one > > thing I noticed is that you say you have a fast ethernet interface on a > > 2610 router. According to the quick reference guide, there is no fast > > ethernet module available for the 2610. Unless they've come out with > > something new, this may be your problem. I'm guessing that you have > > your switch set for 100Mbps/full duplex and your router can only do > > 10Mbps. > > > > In addition, not only can you not do 100Mbps/full duplex on a 2610, > > that ethernet interface cannot be a trunk port. Those do not support > > ISL or 802.1q unless something has changed recently. > > > > If I'm wrong, someone please correct me. > > > > Regards, > > John > > > > >>> "Kiran Kumar M" 7/24/01 8:27:12 AM >>> > > Hai, > > > > I am facing a strange problem. I am using a cisco 2610 router in my > > network. In that I am having one fastethernet, and 2 WIC2T . When I am > > connecting to the L3 switch, it is able to ping to that particular > > VLAN, > > and unable to ping to other VLANS or outside of that VLAN. If I use > > another router with ethernet card (becuase I am not having another > > ethernet card in first router), with the same setup it is able to > > communicate with the outside world. So I concluded that it is not the > > problem with L3 switch. I tried to find it on cisco site, but unable > > to > > locate the solution. > > > > Thanks in advance, > > Kiran Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13552&t=13497 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Problem with Fastethernet 2610 router [7:13497]
How are you accomplishing this? The 2610 has *no* fast ethernet ports and there are no fast ethernet modules available. So, with no built-in 100BaseTX ports and no modules available, where did you get this fast ethernet interface? >>> Kiran Kumar M 7/24/01 11:40:42 AM >>> Thanks for your work. But I am sure that it is having the fast ethernet in 2610. And on the interface speed is auto, and duplex is auto. Other side (on switch side) it is also same i.e., both are in auto. I tried after removing the auto option, but it is same situation. Thanks, Kiran On Tue, 24 Jul 2001, John Neiberger wrote: > I am having a lot of trouble interpreting your problem. However, one > thing I noticed is that you say you have a fast ethernet interface on a > 2610 router. According to the quick reference guide, there is no fast > ethernet module available for the 2610. Unless they've come out with > something new, this may be your problem. I'm guessing that you have > your switch set for 100Mbps/full duplex and your router can only do > 10Mbps. > > In addition, not only can you not do 100Mbps/full duplex on a 2610, > that ethernet interface cannot be a trunk port. Those do not support > ISL or 802.1q unless something has changed recently. > > If I'm wrong, someone please correct me. > > Regards, > John > > >>> "Kiran Kumar M" 7/24/01 8:27:12 AM >>> > Hai, > > I am facing a strange problem. I am using a cisco 2610 router in my > network. In that I am having one fastethernet, and 2 WIC2T . When I am > connecting to the L3 switch, it is able to ping to that particular > VLAN, > and unable to ping to other VLANS or outside of that VLAN. If I use > another router with ethernet card (becuase I am not having another > ethernet card in first router), with the same setup it is able to > communicate with the outside world. So I concluded that it is not the > problem with L3 switch. I tried to find it on cisco site, but unable > to > locate the solution. > > Thanks in advance, > Kiran [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13551&t=13497 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Problem with Fastethernet 2610 router [7:13497]
The 2610 doesn't have a fast ethernet port; it's a 10mb ethernet port only. Can we see the config from the 2610? tm Tim Medley - CCNP+Voice Network Architect VoIP Group iReadyWorld -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Kiran Kumar M Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2001 10:27 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Problem with Fastethernet 2610 router [7:13497] Hai, I am facing a strange problem. I am using a cisco 2610 router in my network. In that I am having one fastethernet, and 2 WIC2T . When I am connecting to the L3 switch, it is able to ping to that particular VLAN, and unable to ping to other VLANS or outside of that VLAN. If I use another router with ethernet card (becuase I am not having another ethernet card in first router), with the same setup it is able to communicate with the outside world. So I concluded that it is not the problem with L3 switch. I tried to find it on cisco site, but unable to locate the solution. Thanks in advance, Kiran Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13548&t=13497 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Problem with Fastethernet 2610 router [7:13497]
Guys, 261x series routers do NOT have fast ethernet, NOR will they accept ANY network module w/ a FE interface. neither will 262x routers, whic have 1 or two FE interfaces built in. the same goes for 265x. one or two built in, but it it not possible to add more. i am assuming from your description that there is another router in your network on that switch. if this is a true L3 switch, than your 2610 is NOT capable of being an MLS RP and there must be another one on the network somewhere. your routers eth. interface will plug into a single VLAN, with an IP route either static or dynamic to those other VLANs via a next hop, the MLS RP on your layer three switch. this is quite fundamental. is there an entry for the network you are trying to reach in your routing table. I'm goign to take a wild guess here and assume that there is not yet. tell us what kind of "L3 switch" you are using i need to know what equipment you have, exactly, in this case, in order to help you. i do not think that this is a default route probllem at all. he is not supposed to be trunking to the switch, he should in this case have a next hop on the VLAN that is connected to other VLANS, if this is a L3 switching scenario. I also think that what he thinks is a layer 3 switch is not capable of acting as one, or is not configured correctly. Kiran, tell us what equipment you have, and what network connections you have. -Peter -Original Message- From: Patrick Ramsey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2001 10:56 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Problem with Fastethernet 2610 router [7:13497] sounds like you have missed a default route on the 2610. The 2610 will not be able to see any other vlans unless the vlan it is plugged into has an ip address assigned to it acting as a "gateway". Then you need to set that ip address as the 2610's default gateway. (or at least specify a specific route to the other vlans) If this is a router conencted to the internet, you would defiantely want to keep the default gw out it's serial interface. -Patrick >>> "Kiran Kumar M" 07/24/01 10:27AM >>> Hai, I am facing a strange problem. I am using a cisco 2610 router in my network. In that I am having one fastethernet, and 2 WIC2T . When I am connecting to the L3 switch, it is able to ping to that particular VLAN, and unable to ping to other VLANS or outside of that VLAN. If I use another router with ethernet card (becuase I am not having another ethernet card in first router), with the same setup it is able to communicate with the outside world. So I concluded that it is not the problem with L3 switch. I tried to find it on cisco site, but unable to locate the solution. Thanks in advance, Kiran Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13515&t=13497 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Problem with Fastethernet 2610 router [7:13497]
I am having a lot of trouble interpreting your problem. However, one thing I noticed is that you say you have a fast ethernet interface on a 2610 router. According to the quick reference guide, there is no fast ethernet module available for the 2610. Unless they've come out with something new, this may be your problem. I'm guessing that you have your switch set for 100Mbps/full duplex and your router can only do 10Mbps. In addition, not only can you not do 100Mbps/full duplex on a 2610, that ethernet interface cannot be a trunk port. Those do not support ISL or 802.1q unless something has changed recently. If I'm wrong, someone please correct me. Regards, John >>> "Kiran Kumar M" 7/24/01 8:27:12 AM >>> Hai, I am facing a strange problem. I am using a cisco 2610 router in my network. In that I am having one fastethernet, and 2 WIC2T . When I am connecting to the L3 switch, it is able to ping to that particular VLAN, and unable to ping to other VLANS or outside of that VLAN. If I use another router with ethernet card (becuase I am not having another ethernet card in first router), with the same setup it is able to communicate with the outside world. So I concluded that it is not the problem with L3 switch. I tried to find it on cisco site, but unable to locate the solution. Thanks in advance, Kiran Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13509&t=13497 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Problem with Fastethernet 2610 router [7:13497]
sounds like you have missed a default route on the 2610. The 2610 will not be able to see any other vlans unless the vlan it is plugged into has an ip address assigned to it acting as a "gateway". Then you need to set that ip address as the 2610's default gateway. (or at least specify a specific route to the other vlans) If this is a router conencted to the internet, you would defiantely want to keep the default gw out it's serial interface. -Patrick >>> "Kiran Kumar M" 07/24/01 10:27AM >>> Hai, I am facing a strange problem. I am using a cisco 2610 router in my network. In that I am having one fastethernet, and 2 WIC2T . When I am connecting to the L3 switch, it is able to ping to that particular VLAN, and unable to ping to other VLANS or outside of that VLAN. If I use another router with ethernet card (becuase I am not having another ethernet card in first router), with the same setup it is able to communicate with the outside world. So I concluded that it is not the problem with L3 switch. I tried to find it on cisco site, but unable to locate the solution. Thanks in advance, Kiran Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13505&t=13497 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Configuration Example for 2610 and 16AM WIC [7:13504]
I am looking for a configuration example utilizing at 2610 and a 16AM (Analog Modem) WIC used for a RAS server. Thank you in advance for your help. MOI Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13504&t=13504 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problem with Fastethernet 2610 router [7:13497]
Hai, I am facing a strange problem. I am using a cisco 2610 router in my network. In that I am having one fastethernet, and 2 WIC2T . When I am connecting to the L3 switch, it is able to ping to that particular VLAN, and unable to ping to other VLANS or outside of that VLAN. If I use another router with ethernet card (becuase I am not having another ethernet card in first router), with the same setup it is able to communicate with the outside world. So I concluded that it is not the problem with L3 switch. I tried to find it on cisco site, but unable to locate the solution. Thanks in advance, Kiran Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13497&t=13497 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: AGS+ crossed over to 2610, Serial cable length issue? [7: [7:10822]
The cable may not be bad. There are 2 wiring types of V.35 Winchester and Straight. It may be simply the other cable type. -Original Message- From: Tim Medley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2001 11:26 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: AGS+ crossed over to 2610, Serial cable length issue? [7: 10815] the ags+ or CGS is doing clocking, I forgot to list the command in my email. I just tryed something else. I plugged a standard 2500 V35 DTE cable to the CAB-VCF and connected the ags+ to a 2501. The interfaces came up/up and stayed that way. I may have 2 bad CAB-SS-V35MT's, or a bad port on the WIC-2T. tim Tim Medley - CCNP+Voice Network Architect VoIP Group iReadyWorld 704-943-3615 - Phone 704-943-3660 - Fax 877-6-iReady - Helpdesk -Original Message- From: Jim Brown [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2001 10:44 AM To: Tim Medley; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: AGS+ crossed over to 2610, Serial cable length issue? [7:10810] Which interface is providing clock for the connection? I don't see a 'clock rate X" command under either interface? -Original Message- From: Tim Medley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2001 8:51 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: AGS+ crossed over to 2610, Serial cable length issue? [7:10810] I've finally decided to sit down and try to troubleshoot what I thought was a faulty serial port on my AGS+. I have a 2610 with a WIC-2T connected to my AGS+ via a CAB-SS-V35MT and a CAB-VCF. The CAB-VCF is from pacific cables and is a 26pin DCE to a V.35 winchester cable. The CAB-VCF is 6 feet long and the CAB-SS-V35MT is 10 feet long; so I have a 16 foot crosover cable. When I cable the two routers together and just configure a simple point to point connection, with the following config: AGS+ int s2 ip address 100.100.100.1 255.255.255.252 encap ppp no shut 2610 int s0/0 ip address 100.100.100.2 255.255.255.252 encap ppp no shut The serial interfacces come up/up but then after a second or two line protocol goes down on both sides and they become up/down. I thought the AGS+'s serial interface was bad (I had a bad applique a while back). So I moved to a different interface on the AGS+, same situation. I then decided to try a different router, I replaced the AGS+ with a CGS, and I got the same results. I now think the issue is with the cable. a) I could have a bad cable. b) the cable I have could be two long. I have replaced the CAB-SS-V35MT, with no luck. What kind of issues would I see if the cable was too long? Would I see the issue I am experiencing? I'm getting ready to call Pacific Cable and order another CAB-VCF. tim Tim Medley - CCNP+Voice Network Architect VoIP Group iReadyWorld 704-943-3615 - Phone 704-943-3660 - Fax 877-6-iReady - Helpdesk Blue Cross Blue Shield of Florida, Inc., and its subsidiary and affiliate companies are not responsible for errors or omissions in this e-mail message. Any personal comments made in this e-mail do not reflect the views of Blue Cross Blue Shield of Florida, Inc. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=10822&t=10822 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: AGS+ crossed over to 2610, Serial cable length issue? [7:10821]
I saw this type of behavior once with a back-to-back frame relay configuration. The connection was working to start with, but then I upgraded one router to a 12.0(x) release and the two routers stopped speaking to each other. The older router was running an 11.1(x) release. I upgraded it to a newer release and all was well. Perhaps you have a similar issue? Have you tried using HDLC instead of PPP just to see if the link will stay up? John >>> "Circusnuts" 7/3/01 9:22:40 AM >>> I know you know this stuff Tim, but did you set the DCE settings on the CSC card & also set clockrate on the DCE side ??? I've spent many a night (late !!!) with these AGS Up/Down Serial interfaces. I've I wasn't so sure the router would pull my back out, I would have pitched it :o) Phil - Original Message - From: "Tim Medley" To: Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2001 10:51 AM Subject: AGS+ crossed over to 2610, Serial cable length issue? [7:10810] > I've finally decided to sit down and try to troubleshoot what I thought > was a faulty serial port on my AGS+. > > I have a 2610 with a WIC-2T connected to my AGS+ via a CAB-SS-V35MT and > a CAB-VCF. The CAB-VCF is from pacific cables and is a 26pin DCE to a > V.35 winchester cable. The CAB-VCF is 6 feet long and the CAB-SS-V35MT > is 10 feet long; so I have a 16 foot crosover cable. > > When I cable the two routers together and just configure a simple point > to point connection, with the following config: > > AGS+ > int s2 > ip address 100.100.100.1 255.255.255.252 > encap ppp > no shut > > 2610 > int s0/0 > ip address 100.100.100.2 255.255.255.252 > encap ppp > no shut > > The serial interfacces come up/up but then after a second or two line > protocol goes down on both sides and they become up/down. > > I thought the AGS+'s serial interface was bad (I had a bad applique a > while back). So I moved to a different interface on the AGS+, same > situation. > > I then decided to try a different router, I replaced the AGS+ with a > CGS, and I got the same results. > > I now think the issue is with the cable. a) I could have a bad cable. b) > the cable I have could be two long. I have replaced the CAB-SS-V35MT, > with no luck. What kind of issues would I see if the cable was too long? > Would I see the issue I am experiencing? I'm getting ready to call > Pacific Cable and order another CAB-VCF. > > tim > > > > > Tim Medley - CCNP+Voice > Network Architect > VoIP Group > iReadyWorld > > 704-943-3615 - Phone > 704-943-3660 - Fax > 877-6-iReady - Helpdesk Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=10821&t=10821 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: AGS+ crossed over to 2610, Serial cable length issue? [7:10816]
Remember the AGS has jumper settings on the appliqui to determine if the interface is DCE or DTE, have you checked that they are set correctly for your configuration. Check out http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/core/cisagspl/agscfig/34084. htm#xtocid2857013 for serial port communications interface (SCI) card ( you do not specify which card you are using ) Doug -Original Message- From: Tim Medley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2001 10:51 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: AGS+ crossed over to 2610, Serial cable length issue? [7:10810] I've finally decided to sit down and try to troubleshoot what I thought was a faulty serial port on my AGS+. I have a 2610 with a WIC-2T connected to my AGS+ via a CAB-SS-V35MT and a CAB-VCF. The CAB-VCF is from pacific cables and is a 26pin DCE to a V.35 winchester cable. The CAB-VCF is 6 feet long and the CAB-SS-V35MT is 10 feet long; so I have a 16 foot crosover cable. When I cable the two routers together and just configure a simple point to point connection, with the following config: AGS+ int s2 ip address 100.100.100.1 255.255.255.252 encap ppp no shut 2610 int s0/0 ip address 100.100.100.2 255.255.255.252 encap ppp no shut The serial interfacces come up/up but then after a second or two line protocol goes down on both sides and they become up/down. I thought the AGS+'s serial interface was bad (I had a bad applique a while back). So I moved to a different interface on the AGS+, same situation. I then decided to try a different router, I replaced the AGS+ with a CGS, and I got the same results. I now think the issue is with the cable. a) I could have a bad cable. b) the cable I have could be two long. I have replaced the CAB-SS-V35MT, with no luck. What kind of issues would I see if the cable was too long? Would I see the issue I am experiencing? I'm getting ready to call Pacific Cable and order another CAB-VCF. tim Tim Medley - CCNP+Voice Network Architect VoIP Group iReadyWorld 704-943-3615 - Phone 704-943-3660 - Fax 877-6-iReady - Helpdesk Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=10816&t=10816 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: AGS+ crossed over to 2610, Serial cable length issue? [7:10815]
the ags+ or CGS is doing clocking, I forgot to list the command in my email. I just tryed something else. I plugged a standard 2500 V35 DTE cable to the CAB-VCF and connected the ags+ to a 2501. The interfaces came up/up and stayed that way. I may have 2 bad CAB-SS-V35MT's, or a bad port on the WIC-2T. tim Tim Medley - CCNP+Voice Network Architect VoIP Group iReadyWorld 704-943-3615 - Phone 704-943-3660 - Fax 877-6-iReady - Helpdesk -Original Message- From: Jim Brown [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2001 10:44 AM To: Tim Medley; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: AGS+ crossed over to 2610, Serial cable length issue? [7:10810] Which interface is providing clock for the connection? I don't see a 'clock rate X" command under either interface? -Original Message- From: Tim Medley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2001 8:51 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: AGS+ crossed over to 2610, Serial cable length issue? [7:10810] I've finally decided to sit down and try to troubleshoot what I thought was a faulty serial port on my AGS+. I have a 2610 with a WIC-2T connected to my AGS+ via a CAB-SS-V35MT and a CAB-VCF. The CAB-VCF is from pacific cables and is a 26pin DCE to a V.35 winchester cable. The CAB-VCF is 6 feet long and the CAB-SS-V35MT is 10 feet long; so I have a 16 foot crosover cable. When I cable the two routers together and just configure a simple point to point connection, with the following config: AGS+ int s2 ip address 100.100.100.1 255.255.255.252 encap ppp no shut 2610 int s0/0 ip address 100.100.100.2 255.255.255.252 encap ppp no shut The serial interfacces come up/up but then after a second or two line protocol goes down on both sides and they become up/down. I thought the AGS+'s serial interface was bad (I had a bad applique a while back). So I moved to a different interface on the AGS+, same situation. I then decided to try a different router, I replaced the AGS+ with a CGS, and I got the same results. I now think the issue is with the cable. a) I could have a bad cable. b) the cable I have could be two long. I have replaced the CAB-SS-V35MT, with no luck. What kind of issues would I see if the cable was too long? Would I see the issue I am experiencing? I'm getting ready to call Pacific Cable and order another CAB-VCF. tim Tim Medley - CCNP+Voice Network Architect VoIP Group iReadyWorld 704-943-3615 - Phone 704-943-3660 - Fax 877-6-iReady - Helpdesk Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=10815&t=10815 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: AGS+ crossed over to 2610, Serial cable length issue? [7:10814]
I know you know this stuff Tim, but did you set the DCE settings on the CSC card & also set clockrate on the DCE side ??? I've spent many a night (late !!!) with these AGS Up/Down Serial interfaces. I've I wasn't so sure the router would pull my back out, I would have pitched it :o) Phil - Original Message - From: "Tim Medley" To: Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2001 10:51 AM Subject: AGS+ crossed over to 2610, Serial cable length issue? [7:10810] > I've finally decided to sit down and try to troubleshoot what I thought > was a faulty serial port on my AGS+. > > I have a 2610 with a WIC-2T connected to my AGS+ via a CAB-SS-V35MT and > a CAB-VCF. The CAB-VCF is from pacific cables and is a 26pin DCE to a > V.35 winchester cable. The CAB-VCF is 6 feet long and the CAB-SS-V35MT > is 10 feet long; so I have a 16 foot crosover cable. > > When I cable the two routers together and just configure a simple point > to point connection, with the following config: > > AGS+ > int s2 > ip address 100.100.100.1 255.255.255.252 > encap ppp > no shut > > 2610 > int s0/0 > ip address 100.100.100.2 255.255.255.252 > encap ppp > no shut > > The serial interfacces come up/up but then after a second or two line > protocol goes down on both sides and they become up/down. > > I thought the AGS+'s serial interface was bad (I had a bad applique a > while back). So I moved to a different interface on the AGS+, same > situation. > > I then decided to try a different router, I replaced the AGS+ with a > CGS, and I got the same results. > > I now think the issue is with the cable. a) I could have a bad cable. b) > the cable I have could be two long. I have replaced the CAB-SS-V35MT, > with no luck. What kind of issues would I see if the cable was too long? > Would I see the issue I am experiencing? I'm getting ready to call > Pacific Cable and order another CAB-VCF. > > tim > > > > > Tim Medley - CCNP+Voice > Network Architect > VoIP Group > iReadyWorld > > 704-943-3615 - Phone > 704-943-3660 - Fax > 877-6-iReady - Helpdesk Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=10814&t=10814 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: AGS+ crossed over to 2610, Serial cable length issue? [7:10812]
Which interface is providing clock for the connection? I don't see a 'clock rate X" command under either interface? -Original Message- From: Tim Medley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2001 8:51 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: AGS+ crossed over to 2610, Serial cable length issue? [7:10810] I've finally decided to sit down and try to troubleshoot what I thought was a faulty serial port on my AGS+. I have a 2610 with a WIC-2T connected to my AGS+ via a CAB-SS-V35MT and a CAB-VCF. The CAB-VCF is from pacific cables and is a 26pin DCE to a V.35 winchester cable. The CAB-VCF is 6 feet long and the CAB-SS-V35MT is 10 feet long; so I have a 16 foot crosover cable. When I cable the two routers together and just configure a simple point to point connection, with the following config: AGS+ int s2 ip address 100.100.100.1 255.255.255.252 encap ppp no shut 2610 int s0/0 ip address 100.100.100.2 255.255.255.252 encap ppp no shut The serial interfacces come up/up but then after a second or two line protocol goes down on both sides and they become up/down. I thought the AGS+'s serial interface was bad (I had a bad applique a while back). So I moved to a different interface on the AGS+, same situation. I then decided to try a different router, I replaced the AGS+ with a CGS, and I got the same results. I now think the issue is with the cable. a) I could have a bad cable. b) the cable I have could be two long. I have replaced the CAB-SS-V35MT, with no luck. What kind of issues would I see if the cable was too long? Would I see the issue I am experiencing? I'm getting ready to call Pacific Cable and order another CAB-VCF. tim Tim Medley - CCNP+Voice Network Architect VoIP Group iReadyWorld 704-943-3615 - Phone 704-943-3660 - Fax 877-6-iReady - Helpdesk Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=10812&t=10812 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
AGS+ crossed over to 2610, Serial cable length issue? [7:10810]
I've finally decided to sit down and try to troubleshoot what I thought was a faulty serial port on my AGS+. I have a 2610 with a WIC-2T connected to my AGS+ via a CAB-SS-V35MT and a CAB-VCF. The CAB-VCF is from pacific cables and is a 26pin DCE to a V.35 winchester cable. The CAB-VCF is 6 feet long and the CAB-SS-V35MT is 10 feet long; so I have a 16 foot crosover cable. When I cable the two routers together and just configure a simple point to point connection, with the following config: AGS+ int s2 ip address 100.100.100.1 255.255.255.252 encap ppp no shut 2610 int s0/0 ip address 100.100.100.2 255.255.255.252 encap ppp no shut The serial interfacces come up/up but then after a second or two line protocol goes down on both sides and they become up/down. I thought the AGS+'s serial interface was bad (I had a bad applique a while back). So I moved to a different interface on the AGS+, same situation. I then decided to try a different router, I replaced the AGS+ with a CGS, and I got the same results. I now think the issue is with the cable. a) I could have a bad cable. b) the cable I have could be two long. I have replaced the CAB-SS-V35MT, with no luck. What kind of issues would I see if the cable was too long? Would I see the issue I am experiencing? I'm getting ready to call Pacific Cable and order another CAB-VCF. tim Tim Medley - CCNP+Voice Network Architect VoIP Group iReadyWorld 704-943-3615 - Phone 704-943-3660 - Fax 877-6-iReady - Helpdesk Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=10810&t=10810 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Can I use FE in 2610 [7:5040]
Appreciate your answers guys, even though some were conflicting. It seems officially I am unable to do this, but some people have tried and it seems to work for them. Well here goes ! Regards Rashid "Rashid Lohiya" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I have been told by a friend that I cannot use a FE 10/100 network module in > my Cisco 2610. > > Can someone pls. confirm this? > > Thanks > > Rashid Lohiya > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > 020 8509 2990 > 07785 362626 > www.pioneer-computers.com > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=5107&t=5040 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Can I use FE in 2610 [7:5040]
Yes, you can. But there is a case, ISL Trunking will not functon properly. I do not know other feature will perform properly or not. May be the new release of IOS will tackle this problem. Just like wic-2T will not work for Cisco 3600 in 11.xx series, now it work fine in 12.x.x series. HTH Vincent Chong ""Rashid Lohiya"" I have been told by a friend that I cannot use a FE 10/100 network module in > my Cisco 2610. > > Can someone pls. confirm this? > > Thanks > > Rashid Lohiya > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > 020 8509 2990 > 07785 362626 > www.pioneer-computers.com > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=5099&t=5040 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Can I use FE in 2610 [7:5040]
I am using a FE module out of a 2621 on a 2610 with no problems even though Cisco config tools says you can't D'Wayne Saunders Senior MIS Operator -Original Message- From: mondo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, 19 May 2001 15:45 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Can I use FE in 2610 [7:5040] I tried using Cisco's configurator tool and it does not list any 10/100 add on modules with a 2610. They are on the 2620s and up though. Hope this helps. "Rashid Lohiya" wrote in message ... >I have been told by a friend that I cannot use a FE 10/100 network module in >my Cisco 2610. > >Can someone pls. confirm this? > >Thanks > >Rashid Lohiya >[EMAIL PROTECTED] >020 8509 2990 >07785 362626 >www.pioneer-computers.com >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=5097&t=5040 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Can I use FE in 2610 [7:5040]
I tried using Cisco's configurator tool and it does not list any 10/100 add on modules with a 2610. They are on the 2620s and up though. Hope this helps. "Rashid Lohiya" wrote in message ... >I have been told by a friend that I cannot use a FE 10/100 network module in >my Cisco 2610. > >Can someone pls. confirm this? > >Thanks > >Rashid Lohiya >[EMAIL PROTECTED] >020 8509 2990 >07785 362626 >www.pioneer-computers.com >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=5094&t=5040 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Missing URL: was, Can I use FE in 2610 [7:5040]
The URL in my previous email was stripped off somehow. So, you'll have to browse CCO yourself.Go to Products, Routers, 2600 Series, Documentation and dig around there for a bit. You'll find the available network modules in that section. John >>> "John Neiberger" 5/18/01 1:10:55 PM >>> Watch the line wrap. According to that page there is no 10/100 Network Module available for the 2600 series. The Fast Ethernet Network Modules are available for the 3600 series. If you want Fast Ethernet in the 2600 series you need to have a 2620 or 2621. HTH, John >>> "Rashid Lohiya" 5/18/01 12:32:18 PM >>> I have been told by a friend that I cannot use a FE 10/100 network module in my Cisco 2610. Can someone pls. confirm this? Thanks Rashid Lohiya [EMAIL PROTECTED] 020 8509 2990 07785 362626 www.pioneer-computers.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=5053&t=5040 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Can I use FE in 2610 [7:5040]
As you'll find out, there is no 10/100 network module for the 2600 series router. If you want a 10/100 capable router, you'll need a 2620, 2621, 2650 or 2651 router. -Rizzo -Original Message- From: Rashid Lohiya [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 18, 2001 2:32 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Can I use FE in 2610 [7:5040] I have been told by a friend that I cannot use a FE 10/100 network module in my Cisco 2610. Can someone pls. confirm this? Thanks Rashid Lohiya [EMAIL PROTECTED] 020 8509 2990 07785 362626 www.pioneer-computers.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=5051&t=5040 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Can I use FE in 2610 [7:5040]
Watch the line wrap. According to that page there is no 10/100 Network Module available for the 2600 series. The Fast Ethernet Network Modules are available for the 3600 series. If you want Fast Ethernet in the 2600 series you need to have a 2620 or 2621. HTH, John >>> "Rashid Lohiya" 5/18/01 12:32:18 PM >>> I have been told by a friend that I cannot use a FE 10/100 network module in my Cisco 2610. Can someone pls. confirm this? Thanks Rashid Lohiya [EMAIL PROTECTED] 020 8509 2990 07785 362626 www.pioneer-computers.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=5048&t=5040 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Can I use FE in 2610 [7:5040]
I don't believe you can use FA's. http://www.cisco.com/pcgi-bin/Support/PSP/psp_view.pl?p=Hardware:2600&s=Hard ware_Info#Modules Phil - Original Message - From: Rashid Lohiya To: Sent: Friday, May 18, 2001 2:32 PM Subject: Can I use FE in 2610 [7:5040] > I have been told by a friend that I cannot use a FE 10/100 network module in > my Cisco 2610. > > Can someone pls. confirm this? > > Thanks > > Rashid Lohiya > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > 020 8509 2990 > 07785 362626 > www.pioneer-computers.com > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=5047&t=5040 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Can I use FE in 2610 [7:5040]
www.cisco.com Check out the products and applicable cards. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Rashid Lohiya Sent: Friday, May 18, 2001 1:32 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Can I use FE in 2610 [7:5040] I have been told by a friend that I cannot use a FE 10/100 network module in my Cisco 2610. Can someone pls. confirm this? Thanks Rashid Lohiya [EMAIL PROTECTED] 020 8509 2990 07785 362626 www.pioneer-computers.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=5046&t=5040 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can I use FE in 2610 [7:5040]
I have been told by a friend that I cannot use a FE 10/100 network module in my Cisco 2610. Can someone pls. confirm this? Thanks Rashid Lohiya [EMAIL PROTECTED] 020 8509 2990 07785 362626 www.pioneer-computers.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=5040&t=5040 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 2610 w/ an additional 1e 2w module [7:3402]
Hey Jason Thanks for your help...Now all I have to do is get rid of the 1E2W card.. And i should be in business for my frame switch... Well actually right now I can still use one of the wic cards & place it in the fixed slot... the other fixed slot is occupied by a smart serial dual port card...so i still have 3 serial ports for the frame stuff... I'd rather have @ least 4 though... Again thanks for all your help guy's !!! Randy. On Wed, 9 May 2001 12:28:45 +1000 "Jason Baker" writes: > If you want to use your 2600 as frame relay switch do as i have done > buy a > NM-4a/s, 4t, 8a/s or 8/t. > > A 1fe2w only works in 3600. > > Regards, > > Jason Baker > > - Original Message - > From: > To: > Cc: > Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2001 4:44 AM > Subject: Re: 2610 w/ an additional 1e 2w module [7:3402] > > > > o.k. so basically to get this puppy to work in the 2600 series i > need to > > get > > a 1FE2W encasing module to hold the wic 2t's ?? I'm going to try > to use > > this box as a > > frame switch so i'm trying to get as many serial interfaces on it > as > > possible... > > > > Thanks for your help guy's!! > > > > Randy > > > > > > On Mon, 7 May 2001 13:53:25 +1000 "Jason Baker" > > > writes: > > > also another tip. The WIC 2-T modules do not work in plain > ethernet > > > based > > > modules (such as 1e2w). > > > You need to get a 1FE2W at least to put the WIC 2t-s in. > > > > > > However the wic 2-t's will work in the fixed serial slots in > the > > > 2600's. > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > Jason Baker > > > --- > > > Network Engineer > > > > > > - Original Message - > > > From: > > > To: > > > Sent: Monday, May 07, 2001 1:17 PM > > > Subject: 2610 w/ an additional 1e 2w module [7:3402] > > > > > > > > > > Hi all !! > > > > > > > > I have just finished installinga new 1 e 2 w module in my > 2610 > > > router & > > > > It's not being recognized, unit allready had an existing Wic > 2t > > > plus the > > > > built in ethernet > > > > port. I added the 2t 1e which is actually 2 wic 1 t cards with > an > > > > ethernet port on the main module > > > > and it's not being recognized, When i remove the existin wic 2 > t > > > cards > > > > only the main ethernet shows up on the show > > > > version..I do see the Act led on the module solid green but > > > nothing on > > > > the sho ver.. > > > > > > > > Am i mssing something ... do I have to activate this new > module > > > somehow > > > > ?? > > > > > > > > Clueless @ this point... > > > > > > > > TIA for any info you might provide. > > > > > > > > Randy > > > > > > > > > GET INTERNET ACCESS FROM JUNO! > > > > Juno offers FREE or PREMIUM Internet access for less! > > > > Join Juno today! For your FREE software, visit: > > > > http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagj. > > > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > GET INTERNET ACCESS FROM JUNO! > > Juno offers FREE or PREMIUM Internet access for less! > > Join Juno today! For your FREE software, visit: > > http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagj. > > > > GET INTERNET ACCESS FROM JUNO! Juno offers FREE or PREMIUM Internet access for less! Join Juno today! For your FREE software, visit: http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagj. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=3905&t=3402 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 2610 w/ an additional 1e 2w module [7:3402]
I'll check & see if i can find one of these on e-bay somewhere... Hey thanks for your help Jason ! On Wed, 9 May 2001 12:28:45 +1000 "Jason Baker" writes: > If you want to use your 2600 as frame relay switch do as i have done > buy a > NM-4a/s, 4t, 8a/s or 8/t. > > A 1fe2w only works in 3600. > > Regards, > > Jason Baker > > - Original Message - > From: > To: > Cc: > Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2001 4:44 AM > Subject: Re: 2610 w/ an additional 1e 2w module [7:3402] > > > > o.k. so basically to get this puppy to work in the 2600 series i > need to > > get > > a 1FE2W encasing module to hold the wic 2t's ?? I'm going to try > to use > > this box as a > > frame switch so i'm trying to get as many serial interfaces on it > as > > possible... > > > > Thanks for your help guy's!! > > > > Randy > > > > > > On Mon, 7 May 2001 13:53:25 +1000 "Jason Baker" > > > writes: > > > also another tip. The WIC 2-T modules do not work in plain > ethernet > > > based > > > modules (such as 1e2w). > > > You need to get a 1FE2W at least to put the WIC 2t-s in. > > > > > > However the wic 2-t's will work in the fixed serial slots in > the > > > 2600's. > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > Jason Baker > > > --- > > > Network Engineer > > > > > > - Original Message - > > > From: > > > To: > > > Sent: Monday, May 07, 2001 1:17 PM > > > Subject: 2610 w/ an additional 1e 2w module [7:3402] > > > > > > > > > > Hi all !! > > > > > > > > I have just finished installinga new 1 e 2 w module in my > 2610 > > > router & > > > > It's not being recognized, unit allready had an existing Wic > 2t > > > plus the > > > > built in ethernet > > > > port. I added the 2t 1e which is actually 2 wic 1 t cards with > an > > > > ethernet port on the main module > > > > and it's not being recognized, When i remove the existin wic 2 > t > > > cards > > > > only the main ethernet shows up on the show > > > > version..I do see the Act led on the module solid green but > > > nothing on > > > > the sho ver.. > > > > > > > > Am i mssing something ... do I have to activate this new > module > > > somehow > > > > ?? > > > > > > > > Clueless @ this point... > > > > > > > > TIA for any info you might provide. > > > > > > > > Randy > > > > > > > > > GET INTERNET ACCESS FROM JUNO! > > > > Juno offers FREE or PREMIUM Internet access for less! > > > > Join Juno today! For your FREE software, visit: > > > > http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagj. > > > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > GET INTERNET ACCESS FROM JUNO! > > Juno offers FREE or PREMIUM Internet access for less! > > Join Juno today! For your FREE software, visit: > > http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagj. > > > > GET INTERNET ACCESS FROM JUNO! Juno offers FREE or PREMIUM Internet access for less! Join Juno today! For your FREE software, visit: http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagj. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=3904&t=3402 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 2610 w/ an additional 1e 2w module [7:3402]
If you want to use your 2600 as frame relay switch do as i have done buy a NM-4a/s, 4t, 8a/s or 8/t. A 1fe2w only works in 3600. Regards, Jason Baker - Original Message - From: To: Cc: Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2001 4:44 AM Subject: Re: 2610 w/ an additional 1e 2w module [7:3402] > o.k. so basically to get this puppy to work in the 2600 series i need to > get > a 1FE2W encasing module to hold the wic 2t's ?? I'm going to try to use > this box as a > frame switch so i'm trying to get as many serial interfaces on it as > possible... > > Thanks for your help guy's!! > > Randy > > > On Mon, 7 May 2001 13:53:25 +1000 "Jason Baker" > writes: > > also another tip. The WIC 2-T modules do not work in plain ethernet > > based > > modules (such as 1e2w). > > You need to get a 1FE2W at least to put the WIC 2t-s in. > > > > However the wic 2-t's will work in the fixed serial slots in the > > 2600's. > > > > Regards, > > > > Jason Baker > > --- > > Network Engineer > > > > - Original Message - > > From: > > To: > > Sent: Monday, May 07, 2001 1:17 PM > > Subject: 2610 w/ an additional 1e 2w module [7:3402] > > > > > > > Hi all !! > > > > > > I have just finished installinga new 1 e 2 w module in my 2610 > > router & > > > It's not being recognized, unit allready had an existing Wic 2t > > plus the > > > built in ethernet > > > port. I added the 2t 1e which is actually 2 wic 1 t cards with an > > > ethernet port on the main module > > > and it's not being recognized, When i remove the existin wic 2 t > > cards > > > only the main ethernet shows up on the show > > > version..I do see the Act led on the module solid green but > > nothing on > > > the sho ver.. > > > > > > Am i mssing something ... do I have to activate this new module > > somehow > > > ?? > > > > > > Clueless @ this point... > > > > > > TIA for any info you might provide. > > > > > > Randy > > > > > > GET INTERNET ACCESS FROM JUNO! > > > Juno offers FREE or PREMIUM Internet access for less! > > > Join Juno today! For your FREE software, visit: > > > http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagj. > > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > GET INTERNET ACCESS FROM JUNO! > Juno offers FREE or PREMIUM Internet access for less! > Join Juno today! For your FREE software, visit: > http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagj. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=3728&t=3402 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 2610 w/ an additional 1e 2w module [7:3402]
o.k. so basically to get this puppy to work in the 2600 series i need to get a 1FE2W encasing module to hold the wic 2t's ?? I'm going to try to use this box as a frame switch so i'm trying to get as many serial interfaces on it as possible... Thanks for your help guy's!! Randy On Mon, 7 May 2001 13:53:25 +1000 "Jason Baker" writes: > also another tip. The WIC 2-T modules do not work in plain ethernet > based > modules (such as 1e2w). > You need to get a 1FE2W at least to put the WIC 2t-s in. > > However the wic 2-t's will work in the fixed serial slots in the > 2600's. > > Regards, > > Jason Baker > --- > Network Engineer > > - Original Message - > From: > To: > Sent: Monday, May 07, 2001 1:17 PM > Subject: 2610 w/ an additional 1e 2w module [7:3402] > > > > Hi all !! > > > > I have just finished installinga new 1 e 2 w module in my 2610 > router & > > It's not being recognized, unit allready had an existing Wic 2t > plus the > > built in ethernet > > port. I added the 2t 1e which is actually 2 wic 1 t cards with an > > ethernet port on the main module > > and it's not being recognized, When i remove the existin wic 2 t > cards > > only the main ethernet shows up on the show > > version..I do see the Act led on the module solid green but > nothing on > > the sho ver.. > > > > Am i mssing something ... do I have to activate this new module > somehow > > ?? > > > > Clueless @ this point... > > > > TIA for any info you might provide. > > > > Randy > > > > GET INTERNET ACCESS FROM JUNO! > > Juno offers FREE or PREMIUM Internet access for less! > > Join Juno today! For your FREE software, visit: > > http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagj. > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > GET INTERNET ACCESS FROM JUNO! Juno offers FREE or PREMIUM Internet access for less! Join Juno today! For your FREE software, visit: http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagj. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=3679&t=3402 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 2610 w/ an additional 1e 2w module [7:3402]
the NM-1e2w is not supported on the 2600's. Some people seem to get ot to work under different ios's with varying results. Cisco doesn't support it, if you manage to get it to work i'd suggest not using it in a production environment. For more info, search the archives, this topic is discussed quite often. tim I hear and I forget I see and I believe I do and I understand -Confucius Tim Medley - CCNA, CCDA VoIP Engineer 704-943-3615 - Phone 704-525-9119 - Fax 877-6-iReady - Helpdesk -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, May 06, 2001 11:18 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: 2610 w/ an additional 1e 2w module [7:3402] Hi all !! I have just finished installinga new 1 e 2 w module in my 2610 router & It's not being recognized, unit allready had an existing Wic 2t plus the built in ethernet port. I added the 2t 1e which is actually 2 wic 1 t cards with an ethernet port on the main module and it's not being recognized, When i remove the existin wic 2 t cards only the main ethernet shows up on the show version..I do see the Act led on the module solid green but nothing on the sho ver.. Am i mssing something ... do I have to activate this new module somehow ?? Clueless @ this point... TIA for any info you might provide. Randy GET INTERNET ACCESS FROM JUNO! Juno offers FREE or PREMIUM Internet access for less! Join Juno today! For your FREE software, visit: http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagj. FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=3494&t=3402 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cisco 2610 serial interfaces [7:3370]
2610 has only console and auxiliary ports built in, other than the single ethernet port. Are you sure you didn't get a 2610 with a module already installed? Perhaps give us a 'show version' readout which will show the hardware devices in the router. -- Jason Roysdon, CCNP+Security/CCDP, MCSE, CNA, Network+, A+ List email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Homepage: http://jason.artoo.net/ ""Hunt Lee"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Can anyone please shed some light on this - what is the 2 > Serial(sync/async) network interface(s) built-in on the Cisco 2610? > They look much smaller than the normal Cisco 2500 Serials. What kind of > cables do they need? Is it expensive? > > Thanks. > > Regards, > Hunt Lee > IP Solution Analyst > Cable and Wireless > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=3432&t=3370 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 2610 w/ an additional 1e 2w module [7:3402]
also another tip. The WIC 2-T modules do not work in plain ethernet based modules (such as 1e2w). You need to get a 1FE2W at least to put the WIC 2t-s in. However the wic 2-t's will work in the fixed serial slots in the 2600's. Regards, Jason Baker --- Network Engineer - Original Message - From: To: Sent: Monday, May 07, 2001 1:17 PM Subject: 2610 w/ an additional 1e 2w module [7:3402] > Hi all !! > > I have just finished installinga new 1 e 2 w module in my 2610 router & > It's not being recognized, unit allready had an existing Wic 2t plus the > built in ethernet > port. I added the 2t 1e which is actually 2 wic 1 t cards with an > ethernet port on the main module > and it's not being recognized, When i remove the existin wic 2 t cards > only the main ethernet shows up on the show > version..I do see the Act led on the module solid green but nothing on > the sho ver.. > > Am i mssing something ... do I have to activate this new module somehow > ?? > > Clueless @ this point... > > TIA for any info you might provide. > > Randy > > GET INTERNET ACCESS FROM JUNO! > Juno offers FREE or PREMIUM Internet access for less! > Join Juno today! For your FREE software, visit: > http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagj. > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=3409&t=3402 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 2610 w/ an additional 1e 2w module [7:3402]
If you check the cisco site you will find that the 1E2W does nto work in a 2600 series. The only ethernet modules you can put in a 2600 series is a NM-1E or a NM-4E. The 1e2w will work in 3600 series though. Regards, Jason Baker - Original Message - From: To: Sent: Monday, May 07, 2001 1:17 PM Subject: 2610 w/ an additional 1e 2w module [7:3402] > Hi all !! > > I have just finished installinga new 1 e 2 w module in my 2610 router & > It's not being recognized, unit allready had an existing Wic 2t plus the > built in ethernet > port. I added the 2t 1e which is actually 2 wic 1 t cards with an > ethernet port on the main module > and it's not being recognized, When i remove the existin wic 2 t cards > only the main ethernet shows up on the show > version..I do see the Act led on the module solid green but nothing on > the sho ver.. > > Am i mssing something ... do I have to activate this new module somehow > ?? > > Clueless @ this point... > > TIA for any info you might provide. > > Randy > > GET INTERNET ACCESS FROM JUNO! > Juno offers FREE or PREMIUM Internet access for less! > Join Juno today! For your FREE software, visit: > http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagj. > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=3407&t=3402 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
2610 w/ an additional 1e 2w module [7:3402]
Hi all !! I have just finished installinga new 1 e 2 w module in my 2610 router & It's not being recognized, unit allready had an existing Wic 2t plus the built in ethernet port. I added the 2t 1e which is actually 2 wic 1 t cards with an ethernet port on the main module and it's not being recognized, When i remove the existin wic 2 t cards only the main ethernet shows up on the show version..I do see the Act led on the module solid green but nothing on the sho ver.. Am i mssing something ... do I have to activate this new module somehow ?? Clueless @ this point... TIA for any info you might provide. Randy GET INTERNET ACCESS FROM JUNO! Juno offers FREE or PREMIUM Internet access for less! Join Juno today! For your FREE software, visit: http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagj. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=3402&t=3402 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cisco 2610 serial interfaces [7:3370]
searched CCO for "cables" first hit is: http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/pcat/ Chapter 10 is "Connector Cables" Then there is a section on "Smart Serial" http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/pcat/sec2.htm Probably all you'll ever need... except prices. Kevin Wigle - Original Message - From: "Vincent Chong" To: Sent: Sunday, 06 May, 2001 12:35 Subject: Re: Cisco 2610 serial interfaces [7:3370] > There is no serial interface built in Cisco 2600 series. You need to > purchase separate module. > > Smart serial is for WIC-2T. Cisco 2600 also support WIC-IT, DB60. > > Expensive than DB60. > > More information, go to www.cisco.com. > > ""Hunt Lee"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > Can anyone please shed some light on this - what is the 2 > > Serial(sync/async) network interface(s) built-in on the Cisco 2610? > > They look much smaller than the normal Cisco 2500 Serials. What kind of > > cables do they need? Is it expensive? > > > > Thanks. > > > > Regards, > > Hunt Lee > > IP Solution Analyst > > Cable and Wireless > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=3372&t=3370 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cisco 2610 serial interfaces [7:3370]
There is no serial interface built in Cisco 2600 series. You need to purchase separate module. Smart serial is for WIC-2T. Cisco 2600 also support WIC-IT, DB60. Expensive than DB60. More information, go to www.cisco.com. ""Hunt Lee"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Can anyone please shed some light on this - what is the 2 > Serial(sync/async) network interface(s) built-in on the Cisco 2610? > They look much smaller than the normal Cisco 2500 Serials. What kind of > cables do they need? Is it expensive? > > Thanks. > > Regards, > Hunt Lee > IP Solution Analyst > Cable and Wireless > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=3371&t=3370 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cisco 2610 serial interfaces [7:3370]
Can anyone please shed some light on this - what is the 2 Serial(sync/async) network interface(s) built-in on the Cisco 2610? They look much smaller than the normal Cisco 2500 Serials. What kind of cables do they need? Is it expensive? Thanks. Regards, Hunt Lee IP Solution Analyst Cable and Wireless Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=3370&t=3370 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CISCO works 2000 [7:2610]
I am planning to take CISCO works 2000 (both Fundamental and LAN/WAN) in Chicago. I find there are two training center offering theses classes in June. One is Global Knowledge the other is Skyline. I called both training center to ask for information about the instructor, they all tell me they don't have the instructor list.How can I find out which one is better? I hate to wast time listen to some boring lectures. I have some good classes from Global Knowledge. But I also have very bad experience for two classes I took from this training center.Thanks in advance.Yan Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=2610&t=2610 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 2610 56/64k DSU/CSU [7:1471]
My understanding of 56K serial is that it won't work with a T1 (only with 56K). It also uses pins 1,2 & 7,8 vs. the T1 pins of 1,2 & 4,5. I've only installed one (they seem silly to me, might as well get a fractional T1 at 128K, or just use a stinking modem instead). -- Jason Roysdon, CCNP+Security/CCDP, MCSE, CNA, Network+, A+ List email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Homepage: http://jason.artoo.net/ ""Jeremiah Wegernoski"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I recently purchased a 2610 with a 56/64k DSU/CSU card in it. > > My question is, what would be the easiest way to implement it with the rest > of > my lab. > > Rest of the lab consists of: > > 2503, 2504, 2509, 2513, and a 4000 as the frame relay switch. > > Thanks a bunch for any suggestions or information offered! > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=1472&t=1471 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
2610 56/64k DSU/CSU [7:1471]
I recently purchased a 2610 with a 56/64k DSU/CSU card in it. My question is, what would be the easiest way to implement it with the rest of my lab. Rest of the lab consists of: 2503, 2504, 2509, 2513, and a 4000 as the frame relay switch. Thanks a bunch for any suggestions or information offered! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=1471&t=1471 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 2610 Serial Interface Puzzler
this link says it - NO! http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/pcat/mxne__p1.htm We had a similar discussion not long ago about FE modules and 2600s and it was interesting because there were people that said they had it working but then Cisco didn't "support" it in any of their literature. Might be the same here. Kevin Wigle - Original Message - From: "John Neiberger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, 23 March, 2001 18:05 Subject: RE: 2610 Serial Interface Puzzler > Hmmm, you appear to be correct. I'm looking through the quick reference > guide and I don't see the NM-1E2W as an option on the 2600 series. That > might be a problem. I wonder if it's actually working. > > >>> "Jim Brown" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 3/23/01 3:53:34 PM >>> > I don't think that module is even supported in the 2600's. Someone > correct > me if I'm wrong, but can't you only use the NM-1E or NM-2W, not a > NM-1E2W in > the 2600's > > -Original Message- > From: John Neiberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, March 23, 2001 3:42 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: 2610 Serial Interface Puzzler > > > Those modules are numbered from right to left, but only includes > installed modules, I believe. If you had two installed, they would > be--from left to right--1/1 and 1/0. > > >>> "Gareth Hinton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 3/23/01 2:50:43 PM > >>> > Hi All, > > Can anybody please explain the following: > > I've been messing with a 2600 with an NM1E2W running 12.1(5)T > I put a WIC1T in to slot W0, so this understandably became Serial 1/0. > Powered down, removed WIC1T and restarted then WR MEM so any config > for > S1/0 > is gone. > Powered down. Inserted WIC1T into slot W1. > This also came up as S1/0 as opposed to what I would have expected > (S1/1). > I had successful connections on S1/0 while WIC1T was in either slot. > > I'd be interested to see what happens with two WIC1T's in but had to > get the > router on line before I could get hold of another WIC1T. > > Anyone know the reason for this? > > Thanks, > > Gareth > > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 2610 Serial Interface Puzzler
John, Jim, You're absolutely right, sorry, it was an NM2W, the ethernet was in the chassis. Gave me a heart attack and a few manic chuckles for a few minutes, as the kit got shipped a few thousand miles today. Cheers, Gareth ""John Neiberger"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message sabb747a.028@fsutil01">news:sabb747a.028@fsutil01... > Hmmm, you appear to be correct. I'm looking through the quick reference > guide and I don't see the NM-1E2W as an option on the 2600 series. That > might be a problem. I wonder if it's actually working. > > >>> "Jim Brown" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 3/23/01 3:53:34 PM >>> > I don't think that module is even supported in the 2600's. Someone > correct > me if I'm wrong, but can't you only use the NM-1E or NM-2W, not a > NM-1E2W in > the 2600's > > -Original Message- > From: John Neiberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, March 23, 2001 3:42 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: 2610 Serial Interface Puzzler > > > Those modules are numbered from right to left, but only includes > installed modules, I believe. If you had two installed, they would > be--from left to right--1/1 and 1/0. > > >>> "Gareth Hinton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 3/23/01 2:50:43 PM > >>> > Hi All, > > Can anybody please explain the following: > > I've been messing with a 2600 with an NM1E2W running 12.1(5)T > I put a WIC1T in to slot W0, so this understandably became Serial 1/0. > Powered down, removed WIC1T and restarted then WR MEM so any config > for > S1/0 > is gone. > Powered down. Inserted WIC1T into slot W1. > This also came up as S1/0 as opposed to what I would have expected > (S1/1). > I had successful connections on S1/0 while WIC1T was in either slot. > > I'd be interested to see what happens with two WIC1T's in but had to > get the > router on line before I could get hold of another WIC1T. > > Anyone know the reason for this? > > Thanks, > > Gareth > > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 2610 Serial Interface Puzzler
Hmmm, you appear to be correct. I'm looking through the quick reference guide and I don't see the NM-1E2W as an option on the 2600 series. That might be a problem. I wonder if it's actually working. >>> "Jim Brown" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 3/23/01 3:53:34 PM >>> I don't think that module is even supported in the 2600's. Someone correct me if I'm wrong, but can't you only use the NM-1E or NM-2W, not a NM-1E2W in the 2600's -Original Message- From: John Neiberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, March 23, 2001 3:42 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: 2610 Serial Interface Puzzler Those modules are numbered from right to left, but only includes installed modules, I believe. If you had two installed, they would be--from left to right--1/1 and 1/0. >>> "Gareth Hinton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 3/23/01 2:50:43 PM >>> Hi All, Can anybody please explain the following: I've been messing with a 2600 with an NM1E2W running 12.1(5)T I put a WIC1T in to slot W0, so this understandably became Serial 1/0. Powered down, removed WIC1T and restarted then WR MEM so any config for S1/0 is gone. Powered down. Inserted WIC1T into slot W1. This also came up as S1/0 as opposed to what I would have expected (S1/1). I had successful connections on S1/0 while WIC1T was in either slot. I'd be interested to see what happens with two WIC1T's in but had to get the router on line before I could get hold of another WIC1T. Anyone know the reason for this? Thanks, Gareth _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 2610 Serial Interface Puzzler
I installed one module in the left (labelled W1) and it became S1/0. So if I put a second module in the right (W0), would the original change to S1/1 and the new one be S1/0? Make a right mess of my config. Sort of wish I'd hung on and tried it now. I'll have to try and dig another 2600 out of spares. Gaz ""John Neiberger"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message sabb6eeb.019@fsutil01">news:sabb6eeb.019@fsutil01... > Those modules are numbered from right to left, but only includes > installed modules, I believe. If you had two installed, they would > be--from left to right--1/1 and 1/0. > > >>> "Gareth Hinton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 3/23/01 2:50:43 PM > >>> > Hi All, > > Can anybody please explain the following: > > I've been messing with a 2600 with an NM1E2W running 12.1(5)T > I put a WIC1T in to slot W0, so this understandably became Serial 1/0. > Powered down, removed WIC1T and restarted then WR MEM so any config for > S1/0 > is gone. > Powered down. Inserted WIC1T into slot W1. > This also came up as S1/0 as opposed to what I would have expected > (S1/1). > I had successful connections on S1/0 while WIC1T was in either slot. > > I'd be interested to see what happens with two WIC1T's in but had to > get the > router on line before I could get hold of another WIC1T. > > Anyone know the reason for this? > > Thanks, > > Gareth > > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 2610 Serial Interface Puzzler
I don't think that module is even supported in the 2600's. Someone correct me if I'm wrong, but can't you only use the NM-1E or NM-2W, not a NM-1E2W in the 2600's -Original Message- From: John Neiberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, March 23, 2001 3:42 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: 2610 Serial Interface Puzzler Those modules are numbered from right to left, but only includes installed modules, I believe. If you had two installed, they would be--from left to right--1/1 and 1/0. >>> "Gareth Hinton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 3/23/01 2:50:43 PM >>> Hi All, Can anybody please explain the following: I've been messing with a 2600 with an NM1E2W running 12.1(5)T I put a WIC1T in to slot W0, so this understandably became Serial 1/0. Powered down, removed WIC1T and restarted then WR MEM so any config for S1/0 is gone. Powered down. Inserted WIC1T into slot W1. This also came up as S1/0 as opposed to what I would have expected (S1/1). I had successful connections on S1/0 while WIC1T was in either slot. I'd be interested to see what happens with two WIC1T's in but had to get the router on line before I could get hold of another WIC1T. Anyone know the reason for this? Thanks, Gareth _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 2610 Serial Interface Puzzler
Those modules are numbered from right to left, but only includes installed modules, I believe. If you had two installed, they would be--from left to right--1/1 and 1/0. >>> "Gareth Hinton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 3/23/01 2:50:43 PM >>> Hi All, Can anybody please explain the following: I've been messing with a 2600 with an NM1E2W running 12.1(5)T I put a WIC1T in to slot W0, so this understandably became Serial 1/0. Powered down, removed WIC1T and restarted then WR MEM so any config for S1/0 is gone. Powered down. Inserted WIC1T into slot W1. This also came up as S1/0 as opposed to what I would have expected (S1/1). I had successful connections on S1/0 while WIC1T was in either slot. I'd be interested to see what happens with two WIC1T's in but had to get the router on line before I could get hold of another WIC1T. Anyone know the reason for this? Thanks, Gareth _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
2610 Serial Interface Puzzler
Hi All, Can anybody please explain the following: I've been messing with a 2600 with an NM1E2W running 12.1(5)T I put a WIC1T in to slot W0, so this understandably became Serial 1/0. Powered down, removed WIC1T and restarted then WR MEM so any config for S1/0 is gone. Powered down. Inserted WIC1T into slot W1. This also came up as S1/0 as opposed to what I would have expected (S1/1). I had successful connections on S1/0 while WIC1T was in either slot. I'd be interested to see what happens with two WIC1T's in but had to get the router on line before I could get hold of another WIC1T. Anyone know the reason for this? Thanks, Gareth _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ISDN RAS with 2610
Hello Friends... I have one 2611 and 2610 with 4 port BRI card. I need to configure 2610 for 8 login sessions in to the router through 4 Port BRI.. I tried some combinations. But. it is not working... Request anybody give me the necessary configuration plan for this.. Thanks in advance to all.. Regards Selvakumar.K _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: problem upgrading 2610 flash
All this means is that the new flash simm is not formatted correctly. When you send the IOS to the flash using tftpdnld, it will format the flash and all is ok. No problem with the memory -Original Message- From: avril mchugh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 07 March 2001 15:59 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: problem upgrading 2610 flash Hi everyone Just wondered if anyone has heard of this problem as I am waiting for Kingston Technology for over a month to resolve this problem. I am trying to upgrade a 2610 from 8mb flash to 16 mb flash. I ordered the memory expansion kit product no: KCS-F2600/16 from Kingston. Once the new chip was installed I received: System Bootstrap, Version 11.3(2)XA4, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1) Copyright (c) 1999 by cisco Systems, Inc. TAC:Home:SW:IOS:Specials for info C2600 platform with 32768 Kbytes of main memory device does not contain a valid magic number boot: cannot open "flash:" boot: cannot determine first file name on device "flash:" System Bootstrap, Version 11.3(2)XA4, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1) Copyright (c) 1999 by cisco Systems, Inc. TAC:Home:SW:IOS:Specials for info C2600 platform with 32768 Kbytes of main memory device does not contain a valid magic number boot: cannot open "flash:" boot: cannot determine first file name on device "flash:" System Bootstrap, Version 11.3(2)XA4, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1) Copyright (c) 1999 by cisco Systems, Inc. TAC:Home:SW:IOS:Specials for info C2600 platform with 32768 Kbytes of main memory rommon 1 > Kingston advised that this is a known problem and that I should be using bootstrap version 11.3, But I am already running this on the router! Now I have to wait for them to re-create the problem in the U.S. Any suggestions welcome. Thanks in advance. Avril _ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: problem upgrading 2610 flash
This is exactly what you should expect to see on a 2600 series router if you don't have an IOS in flash, which you don't because you put a brand new one in there. Use the following steps to load an IOS from a tftp server (these are instructions I gave to my coworkers and assumes the use of our laptop as a tftp server): FLASH Memory Upgrade Instructions for 2600 Series Routers Before you even start, make sure the IOS you want to install on the router exists on the laptop! 1. Open router, remove existing FLASH, insert new FLASH 2. Turn router power on. Send a to get to Rommon mode. 3. Connect laptop to switch/hub and take note of its IP address 4. Set the IP address, subnet mask, and default gateway for the router: rommon > IP_ADDRESS=xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx(Same subnet as laptop) rommon > IP_SUBNET_MASK=255.255.255.0 rommon > DEFAULT_GATEWAY= rommon > TFTP_SERVER= rommon > TFTP_FILE= 5. Begin the TFTP download: rommon > tftpdnld (must be lower case) Depending on the situation, it may be necessary to set the speed/duplex setting of the Ethernet port. For this, do the following: rommon > FE_SPEED_MODE = x 0 = 10 Mbps, half duplex 1 = 10 Mbps, full duplex 2 = 100 Mbps, half duplex 3 = 100 Mbps, full duplex 6. Type i or reset to restart the router with the new image. HTH, John > Hi everyone > > Just wondered if anyone has heard of this problem as I am waiting for > Kingston Technology for over a month to resolve this problem. > > I am trying to upgrade a 2610 from 8mb flash to 16 mb flash. I ordered the > memory expansion kit product no: KCS-F2600/16 from Kingston. Once the new > chip was installed I received: > > System Bootstrap, Version 11.3(2)XA4, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1) > Copyright (c) 1999 by cisco Systems, Inc. > TAC:Home:SW:IOS:Specials for info > C2600 platform with 32768 Kbytes of main memory > > device does not contain a valid magic number > boot: cannot open "flash:" > boot: cannot determine first file name on device "flash:" > > System Bootstrap, Version 11.3(2)XA4, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1) > Copyright (c) 1999 by cisco Systems, Inc. > TAC:Home:SW:IOS:Specials for info > C2600 platform with 32768 Kbytes of main memory > > device does not contain a valid magic number > boot: cannot open "flash:" > boot: cannot determine first file name on device "flash:" > > System Bootstrap, Version 11.3(2)XA4, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1) > Copyright (c) 1999 by cisco Systems, Inc. > TAC:Home:SW:IOS:Specials for info > C2600 platform with 32768 Kbytes of main memory > > rommon 1 > > > > Kingston advised that this is a known problem and that I should be using > bootstrap version 11.3, But I am already running this on the router! > > Now I have to wait for them to re-create the problem in the U.S. > > Any suggestions welcome. > > Thanks in advance. > > Avril > > > _ > Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Send a cool gift with your E-Card http://www.bluemountain.com/giftcenter/ _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
problem upgrading 2610 flash
Hi everyone Just wondered if anyone has heard of this problem as I am waiting for Kingston Technology for over a month to resolve this problem. I am trying to upgrade a 2610 from 8mb flash to 16 mb flash. I ordered the memory expansion kit product no: KCS-F2600/16 from Kingston. Once the new chip was installed I received: System Bootstrap, Version 11.3(2)XA4, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1) Copyright (c) 1999 by cisco Systems, Inc. TAC:Home:SW:IOS:Specials for info C2600 platform with 32768 Kbytes of main memory device does not contain a valid magic number boot: cannot open "flash:" boot: cannot determine first file name on device "flash:" System Bootstrap, Version 11.3(2)XA4, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1) Copyright (c) 1999 by cisco Systems, Inc. TAC:Home:SW:IOS:Specials for info C2600 platform with 32768 Kbytes of main memory device does not contain a valid magic number boot: cannot open "flash:" boot: cannot determine first file name on device "flash:" System Bootstrap, Version 11.3(2)XA4, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1) Copyright (c) 1999 by cisco Systems, Inc. TAC:Home:SW:IOS:Specials for info C2600 platform with 32768 Kbytes of main memory rommon 1 > Kingston advised that this is a known problem and that I should be using bootstrap version 11.3, But I am already running this on the router! Now I have to wait for them to re-create the problem in the U.S. Any suggestions welcome. Thanks in advance. Avril _ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CISCO Router MIB files-2610
Here is link to download packeges, you may need CCO login. Inamul http://www.cisco.com/cgi-bin/Software/CiscoView/cvplanner.cgi ""Hitesh Pathak"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Dear All, > > Can anybody tell me that where can I find MIB files for CISCO Router 2610. I went to CISCo's web site but what I found was all the files with extension .MY . I don't understand how to go with this one. > > thanks in advance > > HP > > ___ > Visit http://www.visto.com/info, your free web-based communications center. > Visto.com. Life on the Dot. > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
