John Neiberger wrote:
>
> It appears that Cisco is updating the CCIP track and removing
> multicast from
> the requirements. Is that really the case, and if so, why?
The whole CCIP track is being revamped. I was a good way towards the CCIP
Metro Optical when they killed it. I don't think it wa
Michael Turner wrote:
>
> The IP/TV 3425 server is an MPEG2 Encoder only. You will at
> least require the IP/TV Content Manager software, if not the
> IP/TV 3412 Content Server. The IP/TV 3417 combines the MPEG2
> Encoder (3425) the control server (3412) and an archive server
> (3432). I currently
David Vital wrote:
>
> This issue came up today during a round table on a real problem
> we were having and no-one seemed to know the answer.
> Router A has a loopback address address and redundant paths to
> router F. If I do a ping or traceroute from rA to rF what Ip
> address will be used to o
Jablonski, Michael wrote:
>
> Has anyone had any experience w/the following combination?
>
> 3640 & NM-1HSSI & Kentrox DataSMART T3/E3 IDSU
>
> I've been trying, to no avail, to bring the HSSI up for a 12M
> DS3 The
> CSU/DSU, according to the lights, is ready to send and receive
> data; bu
John Neiberger wrote:
>
> It appears that Cisco is updating the CCIP track and removing
> multicast from
> the requirements. Is that really the case, and if so, why? As
> far as I know
> multicast is still in the CCNP track and it's got to be on the
> CCIE written
> and lab, so why remove such an
John Neiberger wrote:
>
> It appears that Cisco is updating the CCIP track and removing
> multicast from
> the requirements. Is that really the case, and if so, why?
The whole CCIP track is being revamped. I was a good way towards the CCIP
Metro Optical when they killed it. I don't think it wa
Howard C. Berkowitz wrote:
>
> Does anyone know if there's a FORTEZZA encryption product
> available,
> presumably third-party, for Cisco routers? It's a NSA-approved
> chipset, usually on PC card, for government "sensitive but
> unclassified" traffic. CCO search doesn't give any hits.
>
>
Steve Telford wrote:
>
> Regarding PIM Sparse, Dense and Sparse-Dense modes, does anyone
> know why the
> often stated design preference for sparse-dense exists?
I think that the logic is that with sparese-dense, the m-cast network could
continue to function even if the RP were to die. It's just
p b wrote:
>
>
> I'm testing a setup using source specific multicast. On
> the RPF interface for the target source IP (192.168.25.25)
> I've configured the following command:
>
> ip igmp static-group 232.232.232.232 source 192.168.25.25
>
> This seems to get the right messages forwarded up tow
TP wrote:
>
> Thank you at all for your support.
> Just few comments (sorry for delay but when you are working I'm
> sleeping ;)).
>
> - I can not configure the 3550 as router. I can not change IP
> and subnet for
> many reasons.
> - I can not configure VLAN, I've no chance to configure here
> in
Rajesh Kumar wrote:
>
> How about configuring a "storm control" for multicast which
> will avoid these problems?
>
> -rajesh
>
I think what's happening isn't a storm at all. Flooding of multicast is the
default behavior.
>
> TP wrote:
>
> > Dear Group,
> >
> > I need help about multiscast.
TP wrote:
>
> Dear Group,
>
> I need help about multiscast.
> This is a simple topology... I've to test some video streamer
> devices so I
> must generate multicast traffic.
> All video devices are connected to a catalyst 3550xl.
> We can reach the office LAN through the same catalyst, in
> part
Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote:
>
> Janó van Deventer wrote:
>
> > >
> > > On routers, the few nanoseconds saved by outputting voice
> > first
> > > are irrelvant compared to the hundreds of milliseconds to
> > reach
> > > the satellite.
> > >
> > Yes maybe, but won't you run into trouble with ji
Group,
There have at various times been discussions and debates about binary vs.
decimal expressions in the computing and networking industries. I've waded
deep into several of them. In the last that I recall, I was musing how some
hard drives now seem to be marketed in decimal form (1,000,000 b
rbx10 Defcom wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
> I was wondering if someone can explain to me what is
> "Link-Local to L3 to L2 mapping" under Cisco R&S Blue print
> under In the IP Multicast Section.
>
> I read Jeff Doyle II on IP Multicasting and other materials on
> IP Multicast but I can't seem to dep
e saying.
But, as we all agree, that sucks for a T3. Further indication that there's
a bottleneck somewhere beyond the immediate connectivity...
Darrell Newcomb wrote:
>
> ""Priscilla Oppenheimer"" wrote in
> message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
And now for that link...
http://store.satcomresources.com/index.cfm?do=catalog&a=pd&sku=R1_CM701A
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=65870&t=65830
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.c
I should also have added that "DS" is derived from "digital signal" while
"T" is derived from "T-Carrier."
s vermill wrote:
>
> Scott Roberts wrote:
> >
> > why do people refer to a DS3 as a DS3 and not a T3? is there
> > some
Scott Roberts wrote:
>
> why do people refer to a DS3 as a DS3 and not a T3? is there
> something I'm
> missing?
It's a bit esoteric. I'm working on something that will help clarify. In
short, a DS3 is a frame structure (28 T1s plus 1.504 mbps overhead, all
interleaved in a certain way, etc, et
Nate wrote:
>
> We've run a bandwidth test on our DS3 with nothing connected to
> it but a
> workstation (and obviously a router/pix). We went to
> testmyspeed.com as
> well as dslreports.com. We both got very good bandwidth tests
> (upward 6m/s)
> however in transferring a 200m file to/from a w
Kiran Kumar M wrote:
>
> Hai,
>
> This is out of topic to Cisco. But it is related with
> Communication, so I
> dared to post this in Cisco group. I think knowledgable persons
> in
> Networking won't mind.
>
> If any one having experience in Satellite modems please help
> me. We have
> one Comst
Darrell Newcomb wrote:
>
> > As others are saying, get the carrier involved. Do some
> loopbacks with
> their
> > help. (Do loopbacks still make sense with DS3? I've only
> worked with DS1).
> > Regardless, I think you've done the requisite testing and
> swapping on your
> > side. Time to hassle t
Stephen,
Thanks for the update. It sounds as if this circiut is not back-to-back.
Since there is a carrier involved, you might want to think about how the
service might be provisioned. For example, the carrier may have all the
transport equipment set up to accept a "channelized" DS3 and you mig
Stephen,
Also, what has the carrier told you about this circuit? Most
"carrier-class" transport equipment can report the types of errors being
incurred and where they first appear in the network. For instance, coding
violations, framing errors/violations, simple FCS failure, etc.
Also, did your
Mark,
Saying that THE problem is one thing or another is always dangerous (and,
frankly, a little unprofessional). I should have said that A problem is
that you didn't have a clock source on the line. You need at least one.
Two doesn't hurt either (both can be internal). There may well be othe
Mark,
Your problem is that both routers are set to recover timing from the line.
Telcos don't generally provide timing for DS3s, so you'll need to set one
router for internal clock.
A lot of folks that work with T1s know that telcos can and do provide timing
for those lower-rate circuits. How t
Cisco Nuts wrote:
>
> Hello,
> Does any one know why if 2 routers configured back-to-back for
> frame relay
> point-to-point intf. using different dlci's does NOT work?
Well, it's been a while since I worked with FR. But if you think about a
"true" FR circuit, DLCIs are locally significant but b
backoff of some sort.
I agree that pause frames probably aren't widely used or even very
effective.
Let us know what your further thoughts/experiments reveal...
Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote:
>
> s vermill wrote:
> >
> > Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote:
> > >
> >
M.C. van den Bovenkamp wrote:
>
> s vermill wrote:
>
> > I'm just not sure there's a good real-world example to help
> us with the
> > theoretical "what if" question. In what scenario would a
> large transfer of
> > data be attempted with
eoretical "what if" question. In what scenario would a large transfer of
data be attempted with out any type of flow control in the stack somewhere?
Scott
s vermill wrote:
>
> Steven,
>
> Thanks for sharing. A real example is just what the doctor
> ordered. In your b
Ng, Kim Seng David (David) wrote:
>
> Hi group,
>
> In Bootstrap protocol, does the PIM router selects the RP with
> the higest or lowest IP address (assuming everything else is
> the same) from the RP-set list obtained in the RP-discovery
> message?? I was reading Jeff Doyle's "Routing TCP/IP Vo
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=65352&t=65243
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
r or switch might have, though. That's a good
> question. It wouldn't have all buffers of the same size, like
> in my example, but I didn't want it to be too diffcult! But
> having 1000 buffers as in my example might be realistic? I
> could say 10,000 buffers, but there's
Steven,
Thanks for sharing. A real example is just what the doctor ordered. In
your below example, did the print transaction rely on TCP at L4? I've
captured some print traffic on our corp. network in the past and I'm pretty
sure it was TCP. Don't know if there was a speed mismatch between the
Marc Thach Xuan Ky wrote:
>
> This is all very well but sometimes when people write 500 they
> really
> mean 512, so where does that leave you ?8-)
> Marc
Trying to pull my own hair out whilst wearing a straight jacket?
>
> s vermill wrote:
> >
> > Here'
Here's a perfectly illustrative example of how common it is to jumble all
this terminology up...
I often use a download test site at PC Pitstop:
http://www.pcpitstop.com/internet/Bandwidth.asp
I ran a quick download test that transferred a "500 KB" block of text to my
machine. It took 2.744 sec
Wow! I knew there was confusion out there about this, but I didnt realize
just how much (even on my part it would seem). Heres one possible source
of clarification:
http://www.speedguide.net/Cable_modems/bandwidth.shtml
and another:
http://www.scotsnewsletter.com/best_of/dtrct.htm
(not this S
al math in computers/software. WAN links don't have that problem.
A kbit, in terms of memory or storage, would be 1024 bits. But kbps, in
terms of WAN capacity or rate, refers to 10^3 bits rather than 2^10 bits.
I hope I now stand corrected...
>
>
> ""s vermill"
be more familiar with the
European system -- which also starts with a basic unit of 64,000 bps.
Regardless of which hierarchy you look at, you'll find that the math doesn't
add up according to your calculations. For example, 24 multiplied by 64
multiplied by 1024 plus 8kbps overhead wou
kuma kk wrote:
>
> Hi Group,
>
> Is there any way to capture the traffic on a WAN link using the
> sniffer
> software. I am able to capture the traffic on Ethernet
> connecting Router and
> Switch port by mirroring the port.
>
> Appreciate your help
>
> Regards,
> Kum
>
If you just mean a PC
g, of course, is that the download is being measured in
KB/sec while the connection is rated in kbits/sec. I'll shut up now...
s vermill wrote:
>
> Amar KHELIFI wrote:
> >
> > since
> > 1byte=8bits
> > and
> > 1Kbits=1024bits
> > then
> >
Amar KHELIFI wrote:
>
> since
> 1byte=8bits
> and
> 1Kbits=1024bits
> then
> 32kbps=32768bps=4096bytes
> there is no formula.
Amar KHELIFI,
1kbits does not = 1024bits and 32kbps does not = 32768bps. 1kbps = 1,000bps
& 32kbps = 32000bps. "k" simply means 1,000. The whole idea of 1KB
(KiloByte
The question was whether or not Cisco used the "standard" 0x7E as a flag in
their HDLC implementation. The only WAN protocol analzer I could dig up
predates Cisco HDLC by a few decades. So I did rely on an o'scope as
planned. Between keepalives, a constant binary
10011001100110 c
John Hutchison wrote:
>
> Big deal because it's 6800 miles for a full minute. An OC-48
> can't push data
> that fast that far or that long.
>
>
Yes it can. SONET is 60x60x24x7x52 at whatever rate the optics are running
at. Distance is not an issue. Upper-layer protocols (such as TCP) that
mi
John Neiberger wrote:
>
> Here's a quote from something I just saw in the news:
>
> "Scientists at the Stanford Linear Accelerator Center used
> fiber-optic
> cables to transfer 6.7 gigabytes of data -- the equivalent of
> two DVD
> movies -- across 6,800 miles in less than a minute.
>
> Pushin
be taken
for granted!). Not too many folks bother or have the test equipment +
opportunity, though. That leaves a profitable niche market out there --
especially if you truly understand timing and synchronization of serial
comm. Again, not terribly difficult but rare these days.
I love i
Howard C. Berkowitz wrote:
>
> >Hmm. Well maybe I didn't really want you to get your scope out
> then, but
> >rather a protocol analyzer. That didn't sound as "appealing"
> though. :-)
> >
> >I'm most interested in the fields in the Cisco HDLC header.
> OK, I guess I'm
> >curious about the signal
Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote:
>
> s vermill wrote:
> >> Cisco HDLC just
> > > has this:
> > >
> > > Address - 1 byte
> > > Control - 1 bytes
> > > Protocol - 2 bytes
> > >
> > > It's curious that Cisco HDLC doesn&
Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote:
>
> MADMAN wrote:
> >
> > Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote:
> > > MADMAN wrote:
> > >
> > >>Stuart Pittwood wrote:
> > >>
> > >>>It has been mooted to me that we might get better
> performance
> > >>
> > >>from our
> > >>
> > >>>1Mb line by using HDLC rather than PPP.
> >
The guy in Sunny Southwest Florida wrote:
>
> Does anyone know of a company that will take Veterans Benefits
> for the CCIE
> lab training? I called the Veterans office, they don't know.
> I called a
> few training companies ... Knowledgenet, CCprep and others ...
>
>
> I know this isn't a tec
CiscoNewbie wrote:
>
> Hi. Does the term "subrate" the same as "channelized"?
>
> Thanks.
>
>
>
I haven't heard that term in a while. As far as I remember, subrate is
anything less than a DS0 (64 kbps) in the plesiochronous digital
hierarchy. That's because the DS0 is the smallest defined
Steven Aiello wrote:
>
> I have been readibng through the boards and from what I've seen
> the new
> CCNP Routing exam seems to be a bear. This is the next test I
> am
> studying for. Any one out there that have passed the test,
> that can
> give me a generally study out line? Also what books o
Skarphedinsson Arni V. wrote:
>
> In a Core-Distribution-Access Layer design, would you keep the
> Core L2 or with high end L2/L3 switches such as the Cat6500 do
> you think it would be better to do L3 in the core ?
It's best to always keep in mind where data jumps layers and then mentally
follow
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> J,
>
> Thanks for responding. What I am trying to do is simulate a
> dial-up
> connection to a router without an external telephone line.
>
> The first option looks to me good but I will not be able to
> program the AUX
> port. Or am I wrong?
The AUX port can be set
=?iso-8859-1?q?ciscoGo2002?= wrote:
>
> Hello friends,
>
> I'm working with CEF and I would appreciate your help
> in this easy (I hope) question:
>
> I would like to know the meaning of "attached" and
> "receive" fields that I can see when I execute "show
> ip cef".
>
> Thanks!!!
>
>
> _
Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote:
>
> s vermill wrote:
> >
> > Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote:
> > >
> > > Sitting in a class. It would be very cool if someone
> answered
> > > this before the class got out!? :-)
> > >
> > > Is it rea
Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote:
>
> Sitting in a class. It would be very cool if someone answered
> this before the class got out!? :-)
>
> Is it really true that Kismet can sniff packets on an 802.11
> wireless network, even if you have the access point set up to
> require login/authentication. (as
Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote:
>
> Sitting in a class. It would be very cool if someone answered
> this before the class got out!? :-)
>
> Is it really true that Kismet can sniff packets on an 802.11
> wireless network, even if you have the access point set up to
> require login/authentication. (as
s vermill wrote:
>
> Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote:
> >
> > s vermill wrote:
> > >
> > > Larry Letterman wrote:
> > > >
> > > > In most cases you will only re-write the source mac
> address
> > > > when traversing
> &
Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote:
>
> s vermill wrote:
> >
> > Larry Letterman wrote:
> > >
> > > In most cases you will only re-write the source mac address
> > > when traversing
> > > across a L3 device.
> >
> > I don't t
Larry Letterman wrote:
>
> In most cases you will only re-write the source mac address
> when traversing
> across a L3 device.
I don't think that's so. A host will have an ARP cache entry for its
gateway. That would be the destination MAC. The source MAC would be that
of the sending host itse
Steven Aiello wrote:
>
> Hello All,
>
> I have a question about route summarization. I was reading
> over the
> material from Cisco on the matter, I was wondering; or actually
> assuming. If you want to have route summarization in place to
> you need
> continuos network numbers? I know th
I have a multicast server cluster in a VLAN behind a pair of 6509s with
MSFC2s. The pair of MSFCs is running HSRP. The default gateway for the
mcast cluster controller is the HSRP address. Everything works fine. It
dawned on me today that I might be able to reference the HSRP address as the
RP
Chuck Church wrote:
>
> I got into this discussion kind of late, but here's my take:
>
> Functionally, you can configure either to do what you want.
> But a 1 armed
> router has a couple major limitations that a layer 3 switch
> doesn't. A
> layer 3 switch has ASICs (application specific integr
Cisco Newbie wrote:
>
> First, thanks for all that responded. One clarification that I
> need address is the following:
>
> If I cross a L3 router and the outgoing interface is something
> other than Ethernet, will the L2 frame show a new MAC address?
> In other words, if my outgoing interface
raj wrote:
>
> hi there.
> I have a mac address on my network and need a tool to enter the
> mac address
> in and get the ip address from it.
>
> any tool or any windows command line function or even any cisco
> router/switch function has that capability?
>
> thank you.
>
>
You can do a 'sh a
MADMAN wrote:
>
> Yes with the right IOS they will. Do a IOS/featues amtrix
> lookup to
> verify which exact IOS supports these, I think IP/Plus is
> sufficient.
Dave,
I hoped that Cisco had changed its mind on IS-IS. But I just went to the
feature navigator and the 1700 isn't in the "Platform
Cisco Newbie wrote:
>
> I have a question that has been bothering me. If a packet
> traverses a
>
> L3 devices, does the sorce MAC changes? When does/doesn't the
> source MAC address changes?
>
> thanks.
>
>
>
> -
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerfu
=?iso-8859-1?B?RGllZ28gTWFydO1uZXogQm wrote:
>
> Hello group!
>
> I want to know if the 1720 & 1721 routers support the following
> routing protocols: bgp, is-is
>
> I was looking for this information in the cisco site but did
> not find any detailed information.
>
> Everyone here recommends ci
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Kaj J. Niemi) wrote:
>
> In mail.net.groupstudy.pro, you wrote:
> > speaking of which, how big would the same IOS image be
> without Banyan,
> > DecNet, Apollo, and all the other obsolete garbage that
> contaminates them
> > now?
>
> A bunch of stuff got purged in 12.2(13)T.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Kaj J. Niemi) wrote:
>
> In mail.net.groupstudy.pro, you wrote:
>
> > I heard rumor to the effect that Cisco would introduce /31
> mask support for
> > serial p-t-p links. Anyone tried that yet? I keep
> forgeting to when on a
> > router with shiny new IOS.
>
> It works w
MADMAN wrote:
>
> Glad you got it figured out and I hope you learned some
> reason(s) not
> to do unnumbered. I can't think of and good reasons for it and
> if you
> running out of addresses I have an RFC full of them for you;)
Dave,
I heard rumor to the effect that Cisco would introduce /31 ma
The Long and Winding Road wrote:
>
> ""Priscilla Oppenheimer"" wrote in
> message
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > The router is probably in the same rack as the switch. The
> cable is
> probaby
> > very short. The fact that electrons have to travel across it
> is not a
> > cons
Larry Letterman wrote:
>
> where did the other 1/3 of the speed go ?
> :)
>
>
> Larry Letterman
> Network Engineer
> Cisco Systems
>
>
Scenic overlooks, bathroom breaks, and whatnot. There isn't much worth
stopping off for in "the vacuum of space." It's kinda like the eastern half
of my sta
Deepak N wrote:
>
> Hi Vermill
> Now I got the point. So when i am using the numbered
> interface, the router tries to reach the next hop via the next
> hop ip address, in my case it is behind the directly connected
> interface.But it has no way of finding the next hop ip address
> behind the unn
> 1) define "functionality"
>
> 2) define "difference"
>
> in either case, the net result is the same. for inter-vlan
> forwarding on the
> same box, the integrated L3 switch will be faster because a)
> electrons don't
> have to travel as far and b) the stripping and rewriting of L2
> headers can
Deepak N wrote:
>
> HI All
> I have simple configuration of HDLC connected back to back.
> If i give ip unnumbered at one end and the static ip address at
> the other end, I cant ping the either end. But when i give show
> ip int brief, it shows the line and protocol are up.
> If i give ip unnum
. wrote:
>
> Is there any differnce between smart serial and hssi (high
> speed serial
> interface) or are they one and the same as far as hardware
> connectors go.
>
> thank you
>
>
They are not one and the same. The HSSI interface is mechanically identical
to the SCSI2 connector, which is a
Richard Burdette wrote:
>
> Just before I got your reply, I finally found a document on CCO
> that explained that I had to have the 'ip pim rp-address ...'
> configured on both routers which I did. No I'm not seeing the
> earlier problem about not being able to join the Auto-RP router.
Unless yo
Richard Burdette wrote:
>
> Good morning,
>
> Im working on multicast scenarios at home in preparation for
> the CCNP switching exam. I feel comfortable and can make work
> most of the concepts work, but Im having difficulty with the
> PIM sparse and sparse-dense modes.
>
> I have a setup like
Bill wrote:
>
> My router logs me out in a few minutes and gives the message
>
> R5 con0 is now available
> Press RETURN to get started.
>
> I dont want this to happen by making the timers to about an
> hour.. What
> command is it?
>
> its a simple command but i just cant recollect.
>
>
Go t
I've offered my opinion on the Cisco Press title on QoS on more than one
occasion. Anyone care to offer their own on the above title from Syngress?
I've not yet finished chapter 1 and I already have suspicions. And why such
extensive coverage of EIGRP (something like 70 or 80 pages)? I wasn't a
e until at least next week before I get back to
that customer site.
Thanks again.
>
> The Center for Internet Security has some good info for Cisco
> routers, by the way, but not much for switches. See here:
>
> http://www.cisecurity.org/
>
> P.
>
> s
Eric Rogers wrote:
>
> Another big thing on deducting and or itemizing for this is if
> you do W-2
> work or 1099. I've been writing this stuff off since '98 doing
> 1099 work
> including the Cisco equipment. If your going to do this though
> get an
> accountant. These types of things become an IR
Jens Neelsen wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> disabling STP is not recommended. Use Portfast instead. VTP is
> only on trunk ports active. HSRP is configured per interface (on
> router). What do you want to achieve?
>
> Jens Neelsen
> CCNP, CCDP, CCSI
>
Jens,
Thanks. I have no intention of turning off S
Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote:
>
> Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote:
> >
> > On Catalyst switches, you can use the "set port host" macro.
> It
> > turns a bunch of stuff off.
> >
> > That won't help with HSRP, though. HSRP is definitely
> hackable.
> > If you can see the packets, you can see the unencr
Daniel Cotts wrote:
>
> On CatOS switches there is the "set port host" command.
> "To optimize the port configuration, the set port host command
> sets channel
> mode to off, enables spanning tree PortFast, sets the trunk
> mode to off, and
> disables the dot1q tunnel feature. Only an end station
Larry Letterman wrote:
>
> disable STP on the port...
>
> --
>
> Larry Letterman
> Network Engineer
> Cisco Systems
>
Thanks Larry. I've never claimed to be a security expert. I generally get
the network going and let the local policy folk implement what they see
fit. I guess turning off STP
Group,
I sometimes remember things that never happened. Do I remember that there
is a simple commad that allows you to block STP, VTP, HSRP, etc. from
hitting access ports?
Thanks much!
Scott
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=61796&t=61796
Clarification below...
s vermill wrote:
>
> William Pearch wrote:
> >
> > Does anyone have a recomendation for a sniffer solution to
> look
> > at T1's, V.35, Frame Relay? Any experience with the Logix
> > product?
> >
> > Bill in Anchorag
cog wrote:
>
> I have a 3002 at a remote site in Network Extension Mode. I
> need to have
> clients get IP addresses from a centralized DHCP server at
> Corporate via a
> broadcast from the client thru the tunnel to the server. Does
> the 3002 allow
> me to add a helper?
>
I should have looked a
William Pearch wrote:
>
> Does anyone have a recomendation for a sniffer solution to look
> at T1's, V.35, Frame Relay? Any experience with the Logix
> product?
>
> Bill in Anchorage
>
>
Sorry, no Logix experience that I can remember. There really are two
distinct types of WAN test equipmen
Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote:
>
> s vermill wrote:
> >
> > J. Johnson wrote:
> > >
> > > Is there a CDP config option that will tell a cisco box to
> > keep
> > > a log of CDP
> > > activity? If so, how would an administrator acces
Daniel Cotts wrote:
>
> You are correct. the 568A or B spec shows that pin 1 is tip and
> 2 is ring.
> Pin 4 is ring and pin 5 is tip for pair one. So for a tip to
> tip and ring to
> ring crossover then 2 to 4 and 1 to 5 is correct.
Our copy of the 568 series TIA/EIA specs are out on a construct
s vermill wrote:
>
> Robert Perez wrote:
> >
> > yes you can do it.
> > It uses pins 1,2 4,5.
> > So you make a crossover cable with each pair
> > 1 2
> > 2 1
> >
> > 4 5
> > 5 4
> >
> 1 & 2 to 4 &
Robert Perez wrote:
>
> yes you can do it.
> It uses pins 1,2 4,5.
> So you make a crossover cable with each pair
> 1 2
> 2 1
>
> 4 5
> 5 4
>
1 & 2 to 4 & 5, not as above. Also, it's interesting that most people say 1
to 4 and 2 to 5. I don't have a copy of any specs offhan
J. Johnson wrote:
>
> Is there a CDP config option that will tell a cisco box to keep
> a log of CDP
> activity? If so, how would an administrator access it? It
> might be nice
> to see a history of when neighbors come up or go down, or when
> they change
> settings.
>
> James
>
>
I found th
cog wrote:
>
> Anyone have a way to get DHCP relay working on Cisco 3002?
>
>
What's the problem? And what IOS?
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=61490&t=61486
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://
Mike Mihalas wrote:
>
> Is it possible to connect a WIC-1DSU-T1 to another WIC-1DSU-T1
> to simulate a circuit? I have two 2600's that I would like to
> connect to do some testing with. If it is possible, do I need a
> special cable?
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
> Mike
Rollover cable:
pins 1 & 2 t
Dunne Rory wrote:
>
> I was doing a password reset and went into rommon mode. Instead
> of typing 0x2142 at the rommon> prompt I typed 0x4142. Now when
> I reload the power cycle I can't get any prompt on the console
> screen. I know its not a problem with Hyper Terminal. Has
> anybody got any sug
1 - 100 of 322 matches
Mail list logo
