In a message dated 11/23/2004 4:46:25 AM Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The Midrash, I think, merely sated that
Cain had no previous event upon which to base the severity of his action...
and this may very well be true. However, in trying to read the best out
of t
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Monday, 22 November, 2004
23.44To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re:
[TruthTalk] Two Covenants
Thanks for responding. I read several commentators views and only
one thought it was actually a physical mark. The artic
In a message dated 11/22/2004 8:38:36 PM Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I've always wondered what the mark was as
well. I've heard some people erroneously say it is dark skin. Others a
lightning bolt like Harry Potter (or some other insignia).
The term for mark
Hello, Laura
I've always wondered what the mark was as
well. I've heard some people erroneously say it is dark skin. Others a lightning
bolt like Harry Potter (or some other insignia).
The term for mark [in Hebrew] is
Ot. In the KJV, it's used as such: sign (x60),
token (x14), ensign (x2
John S. wrote:
I don't worry at all about libel, David.
You don't worry that you might have written a false witness against your
brother in Christ? [] Please
consider thanking me for the correction. A wise man loves the one who
rebukes him.
Peace be with you.
David Miller.
--
"Let y
In a message dated 11/22/2004 2:56:27 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Scripture speaks often about the nations coming to Israel. The mixed multitude that came out of Egypt and the foreigner or stranger who dwells among Israel were all to be considered as though native born. I
Slade Henson wrote:
Scripture speaks often about the nations coming
to Israel. The mixed multitude that came out of Egypt and the foreigner
or stranger who dwells among Israel were all to be considered as though
native born. I do not think it would be fair to say God ignored the
nation
From: Slade Henson
Scripture speaks often about the nations coming to
Israel. The mixed multitude that came out of Egypt and the foreigner or
stranger who dwells among Israel were all to be considered as though native
born.
jt: Is 'native born' where it is at Slade? I think
Amen Sladerino!
- Original Message -
From:
Slade
Henson
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: November 22, 2004 05:55
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Two
Covenants
Scripture speaks often about the nations coming to Israel. The mixed
multitude that came out of Egypt and
to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Terry
CliftonSent: Sunday, 21 November, 2004 22.13To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Two
Covenants
No concern for
hidden agendas. I just don't know what to say that would not be
speculation. Since Adam was the first
Scripture speaks often about the nations coming to Israel. The mixed
multitude that came out of Egypt and the foreigner or stranger who dwells
among Israel were all to be considered as though native born. I do not think it
would be fair to say God ignored the nations by giving Israel a specia
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 11/21/2004 7:10:10
PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Et al :
Beginning with post Eden civilization, there existed standards of
conduct that God expected of man (other than those related to Jewish
history) . Cain
In a message dated 11/21/2004 7:49:33 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
John S. wrote:
>Do we claim that the nations of Old Scripture times except
>the Jews had no relationship with God, deserted by their creator
>or, at best, ignored?
No, we should not claim any such thing. R
In a message dated 11/21/2004 7:45:32 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
John S. wrote:
>... but Ruben and pals are no so gracious
Careful about libel, John. I respond to this because Ruben has been a past
participant on this list. I have never heard of Ruben ever punching an
John S. wrote:
Do we claim that the nations of Old Scripture times except
the Jews had no relationship with God, deserted by their creator
or, at best, ignored?
No, we should not claim any such thing. Read Daniel and Isaiah.
Nebuchadnezzar and Cyrus were Gentiles, and Cyrus was even called God's
In a message dated 11/21/2004 7:10:10 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Et al :
Beginning with post Eden civilization, there existed standards of conduct that God expected of man (other than those related to Jewish history) . Cain was fearful of civilizations not defined in
John S. wrote:
... but Ruben and pals are no so gracious
Careful about libel, John. I respond to this because Ruben has been a past
participant on this list. I have never heard of Ruben ever punching anyone.
He was the victim once, but not the assailant. In that case, he turned the
other chee
In a message dated 11/21/2004 6:59:55 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In a message dated 11/21/2004 8:50:12 PM Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Cain was fearful of civilizations not defined in the biblical message except to indicate that they were present in
In a message dated 11/21/2004 6:58:02 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I can vouch for that. We had the privilege of spending a short time with David and Caroline and not one punch was thrown by anyone. He is a sweet spirited, mild mannered, generous man who loves the Lord.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Terry Clifton
Sent: Sunday, November 21, 2004
7:51 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Two
Covenants
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
In a message
dated 11/21/2004 1:53:33 PM Pacific Standard Time
In a message dated 11/21/2004 6:56:56 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
John S. wrote:
>Why don't you ask him why he terminated the
>discussion
I don't ask him why because that would change the subject. I'm still here
awaiting his reply. If he leaves the discussion, the reas
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Et al :
Beginning with post Eden civilization, there existed standards of
conduct that God expected of man (other than those related to Jewish
history) . Cain was fearful of civilizations not defined in the
biblical message except to indicate that they were prese
In a message dated 11/21/2004 8:50:12 PM Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Cain was
fearful of civilizations not defined in the biblical message except to
indicate that they were present in his time. A mark or sign
was given to Cain to protect him
I think it would b
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 11/21/2004 1:53:33
PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
By the way, Slade. Considering that you are only a few hours from
here,
would you be interested in getting together to talk face to face about
these
passages? I could bri
John S. wrote:
Why don't you ask him why he terminated the
discussion
I don't ask him why because that would change the subject. I'm still here
awaiting his reply. If he leaves the discussion, the reason is clear. He
does not have an answer. I have hope that Jeff will return. Slade and I
ar
Slade wrote:
While you look hard for a situation where we are dead
to the [whole] law, I have no such agenda. In fact, my
agenda is opposite. (Yes. I have a bias to keep from
nullifying Torah because Yeshua said that's what He
was all about.)
I clearly have no agenda to look hard for a situation wh
Et al :
Beginning with post Eden civilization, there existed standards of conduct that God expected of man (other than those related to Jewish history) . Cain was fearful of civilizations not defined in the biblical message except to indicate that they were present in his time. A mark or si
: [TruthTalk] Two Covenants
In a message dated 11/20/2004 6:38:16 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Of course you know that I have
>read not only the context, but the entire Bible.
What is this supposed to mean to the rest of us who have equal familiarity with the biblical mess
In a message dated 11/21/2004 1:36:54 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
John S. wrote:
>Once again, you have failed to continue a descussion,
>preferring, instead, to assert your view of your self as
>a backdrop for further and continued monologue.
No, he decided to stop discuss
In a message dated 11/21/2004 1:53:33 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
By the way, Slade. Considering that you are only a few hours from here,
would you be interested in getting together to talk face to face about these
passages? I could bring a few brothers in Christ and y
DAVE In the second paragraph above, you say "Torah concerning the
husband, who is sin and death." I have problems with what you are trying to
do here. In the previous sentence where Paul says, "she is free from the
law" and you define law here as "Torah concerning the husband," does this
Torah
Slade wrote:
Or do you not know, brethren (for I am speaking to those
who know the law [Torah]), that the law [Torah] has jurisdiction
over a person as long as he lives? For the married woman is
bound by law [Torah] to her husband while he is living; but if
her husband dies, she is released from th
David Miller wrote:
Of course you know that I have read not only
the context, but the entire Bible.
John S. wrote:
What is this supposed to mean to the rest of us who
have equal familiarity with the biblical message?
It means that you don't need all the cut and paste verbiage about context
either.
John,
you do realize that this quote is from David Miller,
right?
- Original Message -
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, November 21, 2004
12:19
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Two
Covenants
In a message dated 11/20/2004 6:38:16 PM
In a message dated 11/20/2004 6:38:16 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Of course you know that I have
>read not only the context, but the entire Bible.
What is this supposed to mean to the rest of us who have equal familiarity with the biblical message? And what does this ha
I have already pulled on my hair several times while
on this forum. But, I stop myself from responding at
times. I go on and read other messages and go back to
the message that disturbed me so much. I reread it.
Then I reread it again. This way I can know that I am
hearing the person the way they w
Or do you not know, brethren (for I am speaking to those who
know the law [Torah]), that the law [Torah] has jurisdiction over a person as long as he lives?
For the married woman is bound by law [Torah] to her
husband while he is living; but if her husband dies, she is released from the
law
Jeff wrote:
... as I said before, it allows one to make any passage
of Scripture say what ever is in that persons personal
agenda.
David Miller wrote:
You are doing the very thing you warn against. ...
Jeff wrote:
In this instance, NO. I pulled verses from throughout the letter
to the Romans, showi
Isn’t that what we’re supposed to do on TT? Iz
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Slade Henson
Sent: Saturday, November 20, 2004
5:24 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Two
Covenants?
This has been the most retarded set of
f Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Saturday, 20 November, 2004
19.43To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re:
[TruthTalk] Two Covenants?
who is
it?
On Sat, 20 Nov 2004 18:24:12 -0500 "Slade Henson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
You are arguing with some
Jeff in red:
- Original Message -
From: "David Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, November 20, 2004 20:02
Subject: [TruthTalk] Two Covenants
> Jeff
wrote:>> You must include Romans 7:7-8:3 at the very
least.>> An
hahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahhaha
--slade
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Saturday, 20 November, 2004
19.43To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re:
[TruthTalk] Two
Jeff wrote:
You must include Romans 7:7-8:3 at the very least.
And the whole book to grasp the context of this Epistle.
That is why I dislike Cut and Paste Theology, as I said
before, it allows one to make any passage of Scripture
say what ever is in that persons personal agenda.
You are doing the
who is
it?
On Sat, 20 Nov 2004 18:24:12 -0500 "Slade Henson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
You
are arguing with someone who's been arguing the point you're
arguing.
mber, 2004
16.19To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re:
[TruthTalk] Two Covenants?
myth (re: the
Prophets, JC, the Ap Paul and the KoG, a definition emerges--not
definitions)
On Sat, 20 Nov 2004 14:50:38 -0500 "Slade Henson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
..the p
myth (re: the
Prophets, JC, the Ap Paul and the KoG, a definition emerges--not
definitions)
On Sat, 20 Nov 2004 14:50:38 -0500 "Slade Henson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
..the power of opinion supercedes Biblical definitions
.
--
slade
||
:
[TruthTalk] Two Covenants?
myth (there
aren't two or more definitions--that's the beauty of biblical
language)
On Sat, 20 Nov 2004 10:34:13 -0500 "Slade Henson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
Perhaps in your definition of Kingdom... but that&#x
de
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Friday, 19 November, 2004
22.56To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re:
[TruthTalk] Two Covenants?
myth (it is not
possible givn the NT nature of God&#x
hTalk] Two Covenants?
myth (it is not
possible givn the NT nature of God's reign)
On Fri, 19 Nov 2004 20:02:07 -0700 "Bill Taylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
||
On Fri, 19 Nov 2004 05:56:00 -0500 "Slade Henson&quo
In a message dated 11/19/2004 11:41:39 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I know that a lot of churches have this symptom. But I
would like to think that this group could hold to a
higher standard.
Suzy
I agree but what we can do and what we will do may be two very different t
That should read: J The Elder
:0
- Original Message -
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 19, 2004
23:08
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Two
Covenants?
In a message dated 11/19/2004 11:00:16 AM
Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL
sy...he'll even spank his
wife..
Kay
-Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of
ShieldsFamilySent: Friday, 19 November, 2004
23.17To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE:
[TruthTalk] Two Covenants?
Kay, don
Hasn't she done that several times?
- Original Message -
From:
Slade
Henson
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 19, 2004
17:27
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Two
Covenants?
Please ignore my wife. She could incite nuns to
rebel.
spank his
wife..
Kay
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of
ShieldsFamilySent: Friday, 19 November, 2004
23.17To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE:
[TruthTalk] Two Covenants?
Kay, don’t feel
bad. My husband occasionally gets t
: [TruthTalk] Two
Covenants?
Hi Izzy,
I believe that Lance wants to construct not
just a theory to unify all known physical information but one that encompasses
everything under the Person of Jesus Christ. I believe it to be a noble
cause as well. You are correct that science does not need a
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Slade Henson
Sent: Friday, 19 November, 2004
12.05
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Two
Covenants?
I think it's pretty deep in the
roomsomebody take the dogs out for a walk
TOO FUNNY..I'm rolling on the floor
AG
In a message dated 11/19/2004 8:03:04 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
myth (it is not possible givn the NT nature of God's reign)
On Fri, 19 Nov 2004 20:02:07 -0700 "Bill Taylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
||
On Fri, 19 Nov 2004 05:56:00 -0500 "Slade Henson" <[EMAI
In a message dated 11/19/2004 11:00:16 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi Izzy,
Hope this helps:
Wikipedia defines the TOE as: A theory of everything (TOE) is a theory of th
myth (it is not
possible givn the NT nature of God's reign)
On Fri, 19 Nov 2004 20:02:07 -0700 "Bill Taylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
||
On Fri, 19 Nov 2004 05:56:00 -0500 "Slade Henson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
We need to be building THE
king
, November 19, 2004
10:27 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Two
Covenants?
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hughes Jonathan
Sent: Friday, November 19, 2004
12:59 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Two
Covenants?
Hi
In a message dated 11/19/2004 9:12:47 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I think it's pretty deep in the roomsomebody take the dogs out for a walk
TOO FUNNY..I'm rolling on the floor AGAIN!!
Kay
:-)
J
In a message dated 11/19/2004 8:30:47 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
jt: No, so far as I'm concerned it's not enough. People incorporate the scriptures into all kinds of things and take parts of God's Word
out and make it fit their theology or doctrine. We need scripture to
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Hughes Jonathan
Sent: Friday, November 19, 2004
12:59 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Two
Covenants?
Hi Izzy,
Hope this helps:
Wikipedia defines the TOE as: A theory
of everything
7:31
AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Two
Covenants?
jt: Hi Bill Taylor, it's good to see you are still
around ...
Lance writes:
Question:What is the theological counterpart to
'The Theory of Everything'?
jt: Judy asks: What is the
"theory of ever
--
slade
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Lance
MuirSent: Friday, 19 November, 2004 15.10To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Two
Covenants?
I would appreciate responses on this from bill,
slade & john.
This is one
Behalf Of Slade
HensonSent: Friday, 19 November, 2004 12.05To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Two
Covenants?
I
think it's pretty deep in the roomsomebody take the dogs out for a
walk
TOO
FUNNY..I'm rolling on the floor AGAIN!!
Kay
I am not against righteous anger. I am talking about
the useless arguing that has been going back and
forth. It does not further us toward our cause of
getting closer to God. I am not talking about the
defense of what people believe. Go for it defend your
faith. Call a person a liar if they are a l
Suzy wrote:
I assumed that people on this forum wanted
to put the bickering spirit aside and cling
to the spirit of truth.
Yes, Suzy! You have described what this list is all about. Unfortunately,
we have many who have not yet caught this vision. I am really glad to see
that you have. God ble
Truth
in love... and I know you have both.
-- slade
===After
careful thought, there is no question that I could have chozen a better term to
describe Lance;s comment than to call it dog doo doo. >From now on,
when I read a lie on this list,
Don't
forget what your sins are like.
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of
ShieldsFamilySent: Friday, 19 November, 2004
11.58To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE:
[TruthTalk] Two Covenants
1 Kings
1410 Therefore, b
Thank you Suzy for taking time to consider Romans 7.
Suzy wrote:
There are two different laws talked about in
Chapter 7. One is the law of sin and the other is the
Torah.
Good. I'm with you here. There is the law of God and then there is the law
of sin residing within our members (our body).
Su
Jeff wrote:
Much like the constitution of the USA, God's covenant
has been amended several times. Do we in the USA
have a new constitution today that has replace the original?
Our Constitution was a new Constitution. We ditched England's, taking only
those parts we liked. Nevertheless, yes, I s
From: "Susan Petersen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: November 19, 2004 15:13
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Two Covenants?
> Maybe I should have used the word hope instead. And a
> lot of my thinking came from an assumption made from
> the title of this
wrote:
> Serious question: Why? I ask as I wouldn't think
> that.
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Susan Petersen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: November 19, 2004 14:40
> Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Two Covenant
: RE: [TruthTalk] Two
Covenants?
Hi Izzy,
Hope this helps:
Wikipedia defines the TOE as: A theory of everything
(TOE) is a theory of theoretical physics and mathematics that fully
explains and links together all known physical phenomena (i.e.
"everything").
Serious question: Why? I ask as I wouldn't think that.
- Original Message -
From: "Susan Petersen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: November 19, 2004 14:40
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Two Covenants?
> I know that a lot of churches have this
ak is over
:)
Jonathan Hughes
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
ShieldsFamilySent: Friday, November 19, 2004 11:49
AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE:
[TruthTalk] Two Covenants?
Question:What
is the theological counterpart to 'T
-
> From: "Susan Petersen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: November 19, 2004 11:50
> Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Two Covenants?
>
>
> > When I signed up for Truth talk I was under the
> > impression that we would be talking abo
Susan Petersen wrote:
I am saddened by this. Instead of focussing on God's
Word, there is arguing and tearing down. If we truly
are the body of Christ, we need to start acting like
it. Please stop the finger pointing. "You did this."
"No, I didn't." or "You meant this." "No, I didn't."
Let's focus
t: Friday, November 19, 2004 11:49
AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [TruthTalk]
Two Covenants?
Question:What is
the theological counterpart to 'The Theory of
Everything'?Answer:The
Incarnation
It
is well and wise to think of internal relations. Do not stop with the
extern
ject: RE: [TruthTalk] Two
Covenants
1 Kings
1410 Therefore, behold, I
will bring evil upon the house of Jeroboam, and will cut off from Jeroboam him
that pisseth against the wall, and him that is shut up and left in Israel, and will take away the
remnant of the house of Jerob
mber, 2004
10.48To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re:
[TruthTalk] Two Covenants?In a message dated 11/19/2004 4:55:05 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
After careful thought, there is no question that I could have
chozen a better term to describe Lance;s comment than to c
Well said! By the by there's none of this in what church?
- Original Message -
From: "Susan Petersen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: November 19, 2004 11:50
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Two Covenants?
> When I signed up for Truth talk I w
Well, King James calls it DUNG
Jeff
- Original Message -
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 19, 2004
10:47
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Two
Covenants?
In a message dated 11/19/2004 4:55:05 AM
Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL
.) Izzy
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of ShieldsFamily
Sent: Friday, November 19, 2004
8:02 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Two
Covenants
Seems to me like God used similar
terminology in the Bible, didn’t He? Izzy
I'd
I think that's what the Jman just
said.
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: November 19, 2004 11:26
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Two
Covenants?
John writes: I cna think of a numb
A good word, Suzy. Okay! :-) Izzy
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Susan Petersen
Sent: Friday, November 19, 2004 10:51 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Two Covenants?
When I signed up for Truth talk I was under the
27;s' forthcoming epistle.
> Beep Beep again
> - Original Message -
> From: Judy Taylor
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: November 19, 2004 09:42
> Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Two Covenants?
>
>
> jt: Thanks for the inte
Question:What is the theological
counterpart to 'The Theory of Everything'?
Answer:The Incarnation
It is well and wise to think
of internal relations. Do not stop with the external. Indwel the
Scriptures.
Example of 'internal'
thinking:Slade's post this morning.
I cna think of a n
John writes: I cna think of a number of
scriptures that support the above -- soo, why is it
imcumbant upon Lance to quote them.
Is it not enough that he incorporates the
scriptures as he understands them into his writings?
jt: No, so far as I'm concerned
it's not enough
In a message dated 11/19/2004 6:24:31 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
As to 'interpretation':You are correct on the former and incorrect on the latter.
Ladies both:Your lives carry the day while your 'posts' SOMETIMES do not. But, so could it be said of us all.(as to the 'po
In a message dated 11/19/2004 4:55:05 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
After careful thought, there is no question that I could have chozen a better term to describe Lance;s comment than to call it dog doo doo. >From now on, when I read a lie on this list, I will simply call i
In a message dated 11/19/2004 3:54:50 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Question:What is the theological counterpart to 'The Theory of Everything'?
Answer:The Incarnation
It is well and wise to think of internal relations. Do not stop with the external. Indwel the Scriptures
In a message dated 11/19/2004 2:58:33 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
My wife called me yesterday on my way to school and to
ROFL!!!
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance Muir
Sent: Friday, November 19, 2004
8:45 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Two
Covenants?
I believe that naught will come from further pursuance of
this 'thread'.
8:20 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Two
Covenants?
As to 'interpretation':You are correct on the former and
incorrect on the latter.
Ladies both:Your lives carry the day while your 'posts'
SOMETIMES do not. But, so could it be said of us a
r
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: November 19, 2004 09:42
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Two
Covenants?
jt: Thanks for the interpretation Izzy. I used to
post more scripture but stopped because there was never any
response and it was a lot of work finding chapter
From:
ShieldsFamily
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: November 19, 2004 09:14
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Two
Covenants?
Judy, I think this
is a good example of how we often misunderstand Lance simply because he
talks much like C3PO on Star Wars. I thin
jt: Hi Bill Taylor, it's good to see you are still
around ...
Lance writes:
Question:What is the theological counterpart to
'The Theory of Everything'?
jt: Judy asks: What is the
"theory of everything and why is it important?"
Answer:The Incarnation
jt: Oh Good, you answered your o
ShieldsFamily
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: November 19, 2004 09:14
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Two
Covenants?
Judy, I think this is
a good example of how we often misunderstand Lance simply because he talks
much like C3PO on Star Wars. I think he was not saying that you h
1 - 100 of 179 matches
Mail list logo
