]
To: CF-Community [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 11:14 PM
Subject: Re: A good american
Okay, people, be nice, or I vill be forced to bring out za big shtick. : )
Und you don't vant zat, do you?
Judith (doing a really bad imitation here of I'm not sure what)
I never said
- Original Message -
From: Kevin Graeme [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Community [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 11:17 PM
Subject: RE: A good american
Sort of. I happened to just get it from my father, and it seemed mildly
related to the whole American judicial system with regards
was good
with a bayonet, but you can't put that on a resume - it puts people off!
Frank Barone, Everybody Loves Raymond
- Original Message -
From: Dana Tierney [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Community [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2003 12:32 AM
Subject: Re: A good american
I
- it puts people off!
Frank Barone, Everybody Loves Raymond
- Original Message -
From: Kevin Graeme [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Community [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 11:17 PM
Subject: RE: A good american
Sort of. I happened to just get it from my father, and it seemed
, Everybody Loves Raymond
- Original Message -
From: Dana Tierney [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Community [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2003 2:27 PM
Subject: Re: A good american
happened under Clinton
William Wheatley writes:
Nice comments by the judge. :) At least the judge
Loves Raymond
- Original Message -
From: Dana Tierney [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Community [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2003 2:27 PM
Subject: Re: A good american
happened under Clinton
William Wheatley writes:
Nice comments by the judge. :) At least the judge
was good
with a bayonet, but you can't put that on a resume - it puts people off!
Frank Barone, Everybody Loves Raymond
- Original Message -
From: Dana Tierney [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Community [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2003 2:54 PM
Subject: Re: A good american
um, I can't
]
Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2003 2:54 PM
Subject: Re: A good american
um, I can't parse the first statement and don't see the point of the
second. It's WEN Ho and I doubt you mean to say you broke the law. I
assume
you are saying he did, so it clear you still haven't done any research
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: Dana Tierney [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Community [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2003 3:28 PM
Subject: Re: A good american
I pass. It's just not worth it.
Dana
William Wheatley writes:
LOL Ok i'll go over it again i was saying nice
can't put that on a resume - it puts people off!
Frank Barone, Everybody Loves Raymond
- Original Message -
From: Dana Tierney [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Community [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2003 3:28 PM
Subject: Re: A good american
I pass. It's just not worth
, but you can't put that on a resume - it puts
people off!
Frank Barone, Everybody Loves Raymond
- Original Message -
From: Dana Tierney [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Community [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2003 3:28 PM
Subject: Re: A good american
I pass. It's just not worth
Tierney [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Community [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 1:03 PM
Subject: Re: A good american
Great explanation, Bill. I am sorry you are being so grouchy? LOL. As for
the facts. Look at paragraph 9 --
http://www.nationalreview.com/nr_comment/nr_comment042203.asp
with a bayonet, but you can't put that on a resume - it puts people off!
Frank Barone, Everybody Loves Raymond
- Original Message -
From: Dana Tierney [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Community [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 3:06 PM
Subject: Re: A good american
::sigh:: The judge
3:06 PM
Subject: Re: A good american
::sigh:: The judge and the prosecuting attorney apologized to the guy.
But
ok, think what you like. Have a croissant.
Dana
On Fri, 13 Jun 2003 08:48:45 -0400, William Wheatley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
No in other words if you know people are going
:03 PM
Subject: Re: A good american
Great explanation, Bill. I am sorry you are being so grouchy? LOL. As
for
the facts. Look at paragraph 9 --
http://www.nationalreview.com/nr_comment/nr_comment042203.asp
He is in fact criticizing the program, but as you see it has nothing to
do
- it puts people off!
Frank Barone, Everybody Loves Raymond
- Original Message -
From: Dana Tierney [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Community [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 11:58 AM
Subject: Re: A good american
Bill. Please tell me what you think peer pressure has to do
!
Frank Barone, Everybody Loves Raymond
- Original Message - From: Dana Tierney [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Community [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 11:58 AM
Subject: Re: A good american
Bill. Please tell me what you think peer pressure has to do with this?
The
guy
on your door.
I think the answer to the question is, don't break the rules. It doesn't
matter what everyone else does, listen to your mother.
-Original Message-
From: Dana Tierney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 1:05 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: A good american
the rules. It doesn't
matter what everyone else does, listen to your mother.
-Original Message-
From: Dana Tierney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 1:05 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: A good american
OK... actually that does contain a *glimmer* of sense. You
:30 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: A good american
hmm. And what if the dog is not being abused but your neighbor feels no
dog
should ever be left outside? And what about the people on this list who
have apparently been underpaying their Social Security taxes without
realizing it? You
- it puts people
off!
Frank Barone, Everybody Loves Raymond
- Original Message - From: Dana Tierney [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Community [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 11:58 AM
Subject: Re: A good american
Bill. Please tell me what you think peer pressure has to do
- Original Message -
From: Nick McClure [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Community [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 1:17 PM
Subject: RE: A good american
I think the rule here is: Don't ever talk out loud about breaking the law.
If you do chain your dog up in a way where it seems the dog
Tierney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 1:30 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: A good american
hmm. And what if the dog is not being abused but your neighbor feels no
dog
should ever be left outside? And what about the people on this list who
have apparently been underpaying
that on a resume - it puts people off!
Frank Barone, Everybody Loves Raymond
- Original Message - From: Dana Tierney [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Community [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 1:04 PM
Subject: Re: A good american
OK... actually that does contain a *glimmer* of sense
: Nick McClure [EMAIL PROTECTED]
nacho.com
To: CF-Community [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 1:17 PM
Subject: RE: A good american
I think the rule here is: Don't ever talk out loud about breaking the
law.
If you do chain your dog up in a way where it seems the dog is being
]
To: CF-Community [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 3:10 PM
Subject: Re: A good american
OK, I was thinking about this thread while I was eating my thai chile. It
originally started as a rather flippant remark in response to John'
suggestion that we shoot spies. I gave Wen Ho Lee
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 3:17 PM
Subject: Re: A good american
despite my determination to end this thread I find myself compelled to ask
just how you would wind up in jail for spending?
Dana
On Mon, 16 Jun 2003 15:11:48 -0400, William Wheatley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote
- it puts people off!
Frank Barone, Everybody Loves Raymond
- Original Message -
From: Dana Tierney [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Community [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 3:20 PM
Subject: Re: A good american
::pounds head on desk::: and the astounding thing here is that you
If you bought drugs ;)
I think he meant speeding.
-Original Message-
From: Dana Tierney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 3:18 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: A good american
despite my determination to end this thread I find myself compelled to ask
just
, but you can't put that on a resume - it puts people
off!
Frank Barone, Everybody Loves Raymond
- Original Message - From: Dana Tierney
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Community [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 1:04 PM
Subject: Re: A good american
OK... actually
, Everybody Loves Raymond
- Original Message - From: Dana Tierney [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Community [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 3:20 PM
Subject: Re: A good american
::pounds head on desk::: and the astounding thing here is that you think
I
don't get it. LOL. How are you
, June 16, 2003 3:10 PM
Subject: Re: A good american
OK, I was thinking about this thread while I was eating my thai chile.
It
originally started as a rather flippant remark in response to John'
suggestion that we shoot spies. I gave Wen Ho Lee as an example of an
accused spy who
of justice turn slowly, but it seems that more often than not,
when they stop turning, the innocent go free, and the guilty go to jail.
-Original Message-
From: Dana Tierney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 3:11 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: A good american
OK
- it puts people off!
Frank Barone, Everybody Loves Raymond
- Original Message -
From: Dana Tierney [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Community [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 3:57 PM
Subject: Re: A good american
Bill. Let me worry about my blood pressure ok? I just need
, no skills. Sure, I was good
with a bayonet, but you can't put that on a resume - it puts people off!
Frank Barone, Everybody Loves Raymond
- Original Message -
From: Dana Tierney [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Community [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 3:54 PM
Subject: Re: A good american
:54 PM
Subject: Re: A good american
But you're convinced I'm wrong though. And I am a condescending jerk for
questioning that I am wrong. OK... I know how much weight to give your
opinions in future.
Dana
On Mon, 16 Jun 2003 15:38:54 -0400, William Wheatley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I
can't put that on a resume - it puts people off!
Frank Barone, Everybody Loves Raymond
- Original Message -
From: Dana Tierney [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Community [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 4:34 PM
Subject: Re: A good american
um, please don't call me dear.
I guess I
Loves Raymond
- Original Message -
From: Dana Tierney [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Community [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 4:34 PM
Subject: Re: A good american
um, please don't call me dear.
I guess I just imagined that long discussion where you insisted I would be
best off
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 3:11 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: A good american
OK, I was thinking about this thread while I was eating my thai chile.
It
originally started as a rather flippant remark in response to John'
suggestion that we shoot spies. I gave Wen Ho
Sacramento, CA
-Original Message-
From: Nick McClure [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 1:03 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: A good american
There is a difference between a peace time spy, and a war time traitor. A
peace time spy operating in the US is governed
I've always felt so too.
-Kevin
-Original Message-
From: Ian Skinner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 4:10 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: A good American
I'm sorry, I have lurked on this topic till not, but you hit
a pet peeve of mine. If people would
Programmer
BloodSource
Sacramento, CA
-Original Message-
From: Nick McClure [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 1:03 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: A good american
There is a difference between a peace time spy, and a war time traitor. A
peace time spy operating
Why did it take so long?
Couldn't he have been placed under house arrest and monitored?
He was SUSPECTED of a crime...he was therefore NOT a criminal until
proven to be such.
Yet he was treated as a criminal.
What if today or tomorrow the US Government thinks YOU are a spy, and
decide to capture
apparently falls into the category of stuff happens. I don't know a lot of
the specifics of the case though, so I don't want to nitpick it to death.
Anyone interested can go to www.wenholee.org
Dana
On Mon, 16 Jun 2003 17:32:28 -0400, Angel Stewart [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Why did it take
: RE: A good american
Why did it take so long?
Couldn't he have been placed under house arrest and monitored?
He was SUSPECTED of a crime...he was therefore NOT a criminal until
proven to be such.
Yet he was treated as a criminal.
What if today or tomorrow the US Government thinks YOU
was convicted? Then what do you do?
-Original Message-
From: Angel Stewart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 5:32 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: A good american
Why did it take so long?
Couldn't he have been placed under house arrest and monitored?
He
.
-Kevin
-Original Message-
From: Dana Tierney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 5:45 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: A good american
well, here is what the judge had to say:
I am truly sorry that I was led by our Executive Branch of
government
please get the stick out of your
ass cause its starting to poke through.
good lord
- Original Message -
From: Dana Tierney [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Community [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 4:34 PM
Subject: Re: A good american
um, please don't call me dear.
I
Sort of. I happened to just get it from my father, and it seemed mildly
related to the whole American judicial system with regards to crap.
(It's late and I've run out of brain. Crap is the best word I'm coming
up with right now.)
-Kevin
-Original Message-
From: dana tierney
Well there was more to the speech in the Wen Ho Lee case; the judge pretty
much said that the government lied to him. I suppose it is good that the
judge had enough integity to say so and follow up -- it looks like the man
was released because the US tried to say we have proof but it's
I haven't heard anything about that in a while. There was so much furor over the
designs ...
By the way, did they ever decide whether they
were building them again or not?
Dana
~|
Archives:
I was just curious. I know there was an emotional argument that they should
be built back even taller and other people were in favor of a park...just
wondered.
Dana
On Tue, 17 Jun 2003 00:34:04 -0400, Judith Dinowitz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I haven't heard anything about that in a while.
==
If you are not satisfied with my service, my job isn't done!
- Original Message -
From: Dana Tierney [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Community [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 11:32 PM
Subject: Re: A good american
| I was just curious. I know there was an emotional
| From: Larry C. Lyons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Sent: Saturday, June 14, 2003 12:06 AM
| To: CF-Community
| Subject: RE: A good american
|
|
| You're thinking of Hot Cross Buns - invented in the Siege of Vienna
| in the 16h Century.
cf_disclaimer
Big boring post on the history of some
What part of the constitution did he fail to uphold?
-Original Message-
From: Dana Tierney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 12:30 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: A good american
So its ok to fail to uphold the constitution while seeking re-election? If
Bush
was good
with a bayonet, but you can't put that on a resume - it puts people off!
Frank Barone, Everybody Loves Raymond
- Original Message -
From: Dana Tierney [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Community [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 12:23 AM
Subject: Re: A good american
I just saw
- Original Message -
From: Dana Tierney [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Community [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 12:24 AM
Subject: Re: A good american
In the immortal words of my countrymen - ehhh??? Bill, I don't kow what
you are talking about but I am talking about John's
Yea, after the trial.
Unless the government tells us they are a spy, then just shoot the bastards.
(Of course I am kidding!!!)
-Original Message-
From: William Wheatley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 9:01 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: A good american
yes i
-Community
Subject: Re: A good american
So its ok to fail to uphold the constitution while seeking re-election? If
Bush, let's say, in the midst of the next election, arrests critics under
the Patriot Act... this is not a betrayal of the ideals on which the US was
built?
Dana
On Thu, 12 Jun 2003
Loves Raymond
- Original Message -
From: Dana Tierney [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Community [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 12:45 AM
Subject: Re: A good american
Bill. Let me see if I can explain this so you can understand. The military
service makes you eligible. You still
: Dana Tierney [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Community [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 12:45 AM
Subject: Re: A good american
Bill. Let me see if I can explain this so you can understand. The military
service makes you eligible. You still have to apply, and certify that you
PROTECTED]
To: CF-Community [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 10:22 AM
Subject: Re: A good american
And it's nice to know Canadians can be condescending jerks sometimes too
;)
When I came back from Korea, I had no money, no skills. Sure, I was good
with a bayonet, but you can't put
was good
with a bayonet, but you can't put that on a resume - it puts people off!
Frank Barone, Everybody Loves Raymond
- Original Message - From: William Wheatley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Community [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 10:22 AM
Subject: Re: A good american
- it puts people off!
Frank Barone, Everybody Loves Raymond
- Original Message -
From: Dana Tierney [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Community [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 11:20 AM
Subject: Re: A good american
funny you should mention the term condescending jerk. I never felt bad
PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 12:45 AM
Subject: Re: A good american
Bill. Let me see if I can explain this so you can understand. The
military
service makes you eligible. You still have to apply, and certify that
you
are not a member of the Nazi party, and a few other things. You have
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: A good american
So its ok to fail to uphold the constitution while seeking re-election?
If Bush, let's say, in the midst of the next election, arrests critics
under the Patriot Act... this is not a betrayal of the ideals on which
the US was built?
Dana
-
From: Dana Tierney [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Community [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 11:30 AM
Subject: Re: A good american
Geez Louise. Apparently I DO need to use smaller words.
$250 is an application fee. You have to pay it no matter what. It isn't a
proposal
that on a resume - it puts people off!
Frank Barone, Everybody Loves Raymond
- Original Message -
From: Dana Tierney [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Community [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 12:45 AM
Subject: Re: A good american
Bill. Let me see if I can explain this so you can
Barone, Everybody Loves Raymond
- Original Message -
From: Dana Tierney [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Community [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 11:42 AM
Subject: Re: A good american
ah, ok. thanks for clarifying.
Then in this instance I agree with you. Even if you ARE being
, June 13, 2003 12:30 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: A good american
So its ok to fail to uphold the constitution while seeking re-election?
If
Bush, let's say, in the midst of the next election, arrests critics
under
the Patriot Act... this is not a betrayal of the ideals on which the US
put that on a resume - it puts people off!
Frank Barone, Everybody Loves Raymond
- Original Message - From: Dana Tierney [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Community [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 11:20 AM
Subject: Re: A good american
funny you should mention the term
McClure [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
What part of the constitution did he fail to uphold?
-Original Message-
From: Dana Tierney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 12:30 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: A good american
So its ok to fail to uphold the constitution
. Sure, I was good
with a bayonet, but you can't put that on a resume - it puts people off!
Frank Barone, Everybody Loves Raymond
- Original Message - From: Dana Tierney [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Community [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 11:30 AM
Subject: Re: A good american
The constitution says congress shall make no law, not the president.
Not to get nit-picky or nothin'
-Original Message-
From: Dana Tierney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 11:49 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: A good american
freedom of speech. He used his
Jun 2003 08:03:05 -0400, Nick McClure [EMAIL PROTECTED]
nacho.com wrote:
What part of the constitution did he fail to uphold?
-Original Message-
From: Dana Tierney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 13,
2003 12:30 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: A good american
So
Message-
From: Dana Tierney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 11:49 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: A good american
freedom of speech. He used his office to browbeat political opponents.
dana
On Fri, 13 Jun 2003 08:03:05 -0400, Nick McClure [EMAIL PROTECTED
-Community [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 11:42 AM
Subject: Re: A good american
ah, ok. thanks for clarifying.
Then in this instance I agree with you. Even if you ARE being a
condescending jerk in that thread over there :)
Dana
On Fri, 13 Jun 2003 09:01:14 -0400, William
I don't see how, in what way did the break in keep the democratic party from
saying whatever they wanted?
-Original Message-
From: Dana Tierney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 12:30 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: A good american
I am saying that when your
Right, so what did the president do?
-Original Message-
From: Dana Tierney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 12:32 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: A good american
But since we are picking nits... he CAN'T make a law. It isn't law until
Congess makes
Barone, Everybody Loves Raymond
- Original Message - From: Dana Tierney [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Community [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 12:23 AM
Subject: Re: A good american
I just saw this. I think you aren't thinking before you write. A Chinese
scientist
Message -
From: Larry C. Lyons [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Community [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 11:54 AM
Subject: Re: A good american
Yes we have so many American paragons to follow.
larry
At 10:22 AM 6/13/2003 -0400, William Wheatley wrote:
And it's nice to know Canadians
: Friday, June 13, 2003 1:07 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: A good american
::sigh:: The judge and the prosecuting attorney apologized to
the guy. But
ok, think what you like. Have a croissant.
Dana
On Fri, 13 Jun 2003 08:48:45 -0400, William Wheatley
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote
Web Programmer
BloodSource
Sacramento, CA
-Original Message-
From: Andre Turrettini [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 2:07 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: A good american
I question whether flingin an internet croissant is now more demeaning than
an iron muffin
countered the attack.
The shape is supposed to be that of a crescent moon.
--
Ian Skinner
Web Programmer
BloodSource
Sacramento, CA
-Original Message-
From: Andre Turrettini [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 2:07 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: A good american
connotations?
Unless your french of course in whcih case you like your croissants just
fine.
hmm.
DRE
-Original Message-
From: Dana Tierney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 13,
2003 1:07 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: A good american
::sigh:: The judge
Air f'ing borne.
-Original Message-
From: John Stanley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 10:18 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: A good american
The beautiful thing about america is you dont have to respect the military,
or anything else to LEETCH off
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 2:08 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: A good american
he betrayed his country and there was good that he did. They are not
incompatible statements, just as Clinton lied and Clinton was good for this
country are not incompatible statements.
Dana
Where did this medic myth come from?
All the ones I knew carried 9 mils, Shotguns or M-4s.
Tim
-Original Message-
From: Dana Tierney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 2:30 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: A good american
I don't have to wonder. I have been
to flame you. I am deeply hurt by your earlier comments.
You obviously have no idea of the constant dangors this country faces.
Tim
-Original Message-
From: Dana Tierney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 2:30 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: A good american
I don't have
11, 2003 1:16 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: A good american
Buddism.
If you can call the Dali Lama a coward, you don't know the story.
I must admit I find your conviction that anyone who doesn't go in guns
blazing is a coward to be very depressing, I hope that that sort of
ultra aggressive
Yes, I see quite well. Thanks for your concern. ;-)
-Kevin
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Schmidt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 9:37 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: A good american
So can you see with your nose stuck so high up in the air, or
do
No, the pacifist medics should be nude with big bullseyes on their chests
and backs...
-Original Message-
From: Heald, Tim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 8:34 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: A good american
Where did this medic myth come from?
All the ones I
- it puts people off!
Frank Barone, Everybody Loves Raymond
- Original Message -
From: Harkins,Patrick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Community [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 5:41 PM
Subject: RE: A good american
Pesronally I feel sorry for the girl.
-Patrick
-Original
PROTECTED]
To: CF-Community [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 5:34 PM
Subject: Re: A good american
there was no limitation about peace time put on the the earlier discussion
about shooting anyone who betrayed this country.
Dana
William Wheatley writes:
You don't summarily
PROTECTED]
To: CF-Community [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 5:42 PM
Subject: Re: A good american
AFAIK he did nothing worse than take a laptop containing classified data
out of its prescribed area. It later developed that this was very often
done at Los Alamos, and many laptops
Message -
From: Dana Tierney [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Community [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 5:06 PM
Subject: Re: A good american
I don't need to perform military service to get citizenhip. I need to get
over to the INS office with $250 dollars.
The plan isnt just proposed
It's an expression, and one that fits the situation.
-Original Message-
From: Heald, Tim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 12 June 2003 12:29
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: A good american
Ok,
Lets be real here. I have been under arms in a foreign
land, and not once did
inline
-Original Message-
From: Adam Churvis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 11 June 2003 19:11
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: A good american
The Dali Lamas country of choice is Tibet, for obvious reasons he
can't go back there.
The reason may not be obvious to everyone
The reason may not be obvious to everyone. In fact, the
Tibetan Buddhists fought and lost a brief war with China. I
mean no disrespect to the Dalai Lama, but he did leave for
India where there was a strong enough military to protect
him.
That is not true, Tibet had a tiny army,
PROTECTED]
wrote:
No, the pacifist medics should be nude with big bullseyes on their chests
and backs...
-Original Message-
From: Heald, Tim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 8:34 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: A good american
Where did this medic myth come from
1 - 100 of 234 matches
Mail list logo
