On Fri, January 31 2003 7:54 pm, mike wrote:
: Not one of the hijackers was Iraqi, 15 of the 19 were Saudi however; our
: ally. This ain't about 9/11, its about 11/??/2004.
:
Oh boy! All the things I could do to him! And he'd never say it was me, if I
sent someone else to do it! WOOT!
--
Chuck B
Saddam has been a dictator (evil) and had weapons for 20 years and there has
not been a global event. Dubya has been President for 2 years and he is
going to start one. Taken with the fact that there are 2 other unrelated
nations that he includes in his "axis of power", this is a dangerous
si
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Wolfgang Bornath
> Sent: Wednesday, 29 January 2003 2:41 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [expert] OT Will there be a tomorrow?
>
> On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 23:22 -0500, Mark Weaver wrote:
> > Wolfgang Bornath wrote:
> > >
Todd Lyons wrote on Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 12:03:39PM -0800 :
> > I listened to the US-Amercan president.
> Offtopic for this list. Take it offlist.
When I wake up tomorrow, I will unsubscribe everybody who has
contributed to this thread as of right now. I announced it yesterday
giving 24 hours n
> >
> > ..OH! That guy is going to kill his neighbour! Quick! Let's nuke them
> > both right off the face of the earth!
>
> Whew, what an accurate characterization of current events. Stop being a
> damn idiot.
I'll stop being a damn idiot, sir, when you stop making arguable statements
and insult
Die thread, die.
-- cmg
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
On Wed, 2003-01-29 at 15:03, Todd Lyons wrote:
> Wolfgang Bornath wrote on Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 04:49:36AM +0100 :
> > Sorry to bother you, but we were discussing whether there will be a
> > future for MandrakeSoft.
> > After tonight I wonder whether there will be a future for us all and
> > the w
On Thu, 2003-01-30 at 16:38, Ross Slade wrote:
> > > The truth is that America has behaved with enormous restraint since
> >
> > Oh please, what a load of grandstanding tripe.
>
> My apologies to this list, I have just joined and thought I had joined a
> Mandrake Linux support list. Can anyone giv
> > The truth is that America has behaved with enormous restraint since
>
> Oh please, what a load of grandstanding tripe.
My apologies to this list, I have just joined and thought I had joined a
Mandrake Linux support list. Can anyone give me the correct address so I can
join the Mandrake Expert
On Thursday 30 January 2003 03:19 pm, Tibbetts, Ric wrote:
> With all the Anit-American inflamitory comments that have been generated
> on this thread, I couldn't help but to break down, and add my piece to
> this.
Thanks Ric!
--
On Thu, 2003-01-30 at 16:11, Mick Szucs wrote:
> All you Republican-wannabe U.S. fascist-impostor "president" lovers can
> eat me. Go find one of those nukes that Dubya loves so much more than
> educated children or healthy senior citizens and shove it right up your
> ass. The world will be a saf
On Thu, 2003-01-30 at 15:19, Tibbetts, Ric wrote:
> The truth is that America has behaved with enormous restraint since
> September 11. Remember, remember! Remember the gut-wrenching tapes of
> weeping men phoning their wives to say, "I love you," before they were
> burned alive. Remember those
Ladies and gentlemen (you too, Bornath) before I get started here I'd
like to introduce Dr Khidhir Hamza, a defector nuclear scientist from
Iraq currently residing in the United States.
http://www.benadorassociates.com/hamza.php
I note that there has been a considerable lessening of traffic on
With all the Anit-American inflamitory comments that have been generated
on this thread, I couldn't help but to break down, and add my piece to this.
This is an article from London's Daily Mirror
Surprise! Surprise! When one of the world's most liberal left wing
newspapers writes a great article
Title: RE: [expert] OT Will there be a tomorrow?
Ron,
Where did you study psychology?
Your opinion of the "Even an elementary psychological awareness immediately recognizes his
multiple false projections. First, instead of owning it, he projects his own devils on to Osama bin
Lyvim Xaphir wrote:
I don't take kindly to my president being called a madman.
But it is plainly quite true - he is quite certifiably insane.He is
the grandson of a traitor, Prescott Bush, who was aiding and abetting
the Nazis though WWII until he was arrested and imprisoned.The sins
On Fri, Jan 31, 2003 at 12:24:20AM +1100, Ron Stodden wrote:
> Iraq's invasion of Kuwait was because Kuwait was slant drilling under
> the border to illegally extract Iraqian oil and refused to desist.
I thought this thread was declared dead? But I do want to thank you
for informing me as to why Ku
by my very haphazard count, there have
been somewhere close to 100 posts on this thread alone - far too
many for a subject so blatantly OT as this was initially, and has
continued to mutate into.
--- Original Message ---
From: et <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [
> You want it to sound like these powers were not part of the same set of
> allies; but they were. It was not a double war, it was a single war on
> two fronts.
> LX
ehh,,, they sure did not surrender together.
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
Go to http://www.mandrakesto
Franki wrote:
Also, I am not a yank, I'm Australian, but IF the US are telling the truth..
then hell yes, we should overthrow saddam.. and for once we should do it
BEFORE a tragedy occurs, not after..
To act like that patently violates the UN charter which expressly
prohibits that kind of mega
On Wed, 2003-01-29 at 11:47, John Hart wrote:
> Keep talking sonny. Oh, that is until the terrorists come and bomb your
> insignificant little cities like Aarhus, Copenhagen ...etc. Then, just
> maybe THAT will change your mind.
Amen. Let's not leave out the possibility of nuclear fallout from
On Wed, 2003-01-29 at 14:17, Wolfgang Bornath wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 13:39 -0500, Ronald J. Hall wrote:
> > On Wednesday 29 January 2003 02:11 am, Wolfgang Bornath wrote:
> >
> > > Totally different situation. The American president and the congress
> > > did not want to go to war agains
Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Lyvim Xaphir
Sent: Thursday, 30 January 2003 3:24 AM
To: ExpertMandrake-List
Subject: Re: [expert] OT Will there be a tomorrow?
On Wed, 2003-01-29 at 08:18, Dallam Wych wrote:
> > > > I'm not
This is class!... hats off to the author now just to clean up the
monitor after I spit out my dinner laughing. *grin*
James
On Wed, 2003-01-29 at 16:19, Damian Gatabria wrote:
> On Wednesday 29 January 2003 18:56, Robert Goshko wrote:
> > New flick, coming to a theatre of war soon:
> >
> >
On Wednesday 29 January 2003 18:56, Robert Goshko wrote:
> New flick, coming to a theatre of war soon:
>
>The Bush Administration
> In Association With
> The Other Bush Administration
> Presents
>
> Gulf Wars__
> E P I S O D E I I
> Clone Of The Attack
>
Fortunately that happens to include all your text as well; into the
stupid category that you conveniently created.
On Wed, 2003-01-29 at 11:46, Alan Wilter Sousa da Silva wrote:
> I beg your all pardon but I could not keep my fingers away from the
> keyboard after such a stupid things written bel
On Wed, 2003-01-29 at 09:01, Chuck Burns wrote:
> The decision for war is with Saddam. According to Hans Blix, Iraq has NOT
> allowed U2 Flyovers, has HIDDEN documents, etc.. THEY HAVE HAD 12 YEARS to
> COMPLY with the UN Eunuchs.. Now.. Do you think if we give him more time, do
> you REALLY t
>
> For the same reason however, I feel strongly that many people would die
> needlessly by the hands of dictators and terrorist regimes if the US did
> retract, similar to the deaths of those that have occurred already under
..OH! That guy is going to kill his neighbour! Quick! Let's nuke them bo
>
> Except when it comes to people that are not here, like the President of
> the United States. Better to talk in insults about people when they
> can't respond or see your emails directly, eh?
...Is Bush your uncle or something?
--
--
I don't want Windows t
On Wednesday 29 January 2003 07:12 pm, Jack Coates wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-01-29 at 12:12, et wrote:
> > > Take it offlist or people will start getting booted from the list. I
> > > don't have the capability to do it right now, but I will request it if
> > > this thread continues too much longer.
>
On Wed, 2003-01-29 at 12:12, et wrote:
> >
> > Take it offlist or people will start getting booted from the list. I
> > don't have the capability to do it right now, but I will request it if
> > this thread continues too much longer.
> >
> don't do that, don't even threaten it. these are very hel
Dallam Wych wrote on Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 04:57:55PM + :
> On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 11:34:31AM -0500, Sascha Noyes wrote:
> > The only reason that he posted privately (by error) is that you have got a
> > "reply to" set while discussing on a mailing list.
> I don't think so, I think it is a kmai
On Wed, January 29 2003 1:43 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
*snip*
> Consider this case:
> A large state such as California had 1,000,000 votes cast. After counting
> 750,000 ballots, Bush is leading by 300,000 ballots. California, under the
> electoral vote system can stop counting now as those rema
On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 14:34 -0500, logic7 wrote:
> According to accounts from different areas of the world, we didn't enter the
> war until we were attacked. I've heard this from folks from several european
> countries. Our history books would have you believe that we were the heros
> of ww2, in
>
> Take it offlist or people will start getting booted from the list. I
> don't have the capability to do it right now, but I will request it if
> this thread continues too much longer.
>
don't do that, don't even threaten it. these are very helpful folks that feel
a need to discuss this. besi
On Wed, 2003-01-29 at 11:09, Praedor Tempus Atrebates wrote:
> Guys, PLEASE! Uncalled for, ugly, and way too knee-jerk U.S.A.-conservative.
Oh but there's been absolutely no leftist socialist knee jerking here,
has there? Not getting too hot for you, is it, praedor?
> Let's please cut the pers
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 29 January 2003 02:09 pm, Ronald J. Hall wrote:
> On Wednesday 29 January 2003 12:14 pm, Praedor Tempus Atrebates wrote:
> > of US citizens with contrary views to those of the court-appointed US
> > president and his apologists - I count s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Franki wrote on Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 02:48:37PM +0800 :
> get a grip people
> I don't know much about iraq.. none of us really do.. and thats the point,
Take it offlist or people will start getting booted from the list. I
don't have the capabili
On Wednesday 29 January 2003 02:34 pm, logic7 wrote:
> According to accounts from different areas of the world, we didn't enter
> the war until we were attacked. I've heard this from folks from several
> european countries. Our history books would have you believe that we were
> the heros of ww2, i
On Thu, 2003-01-30 at 06:51, Praedor Tempus Atrebates wrote:
> How many citizens in Iran and Afghanistan are or were truly happy with the
> fundamentalist governments they have or had?
I'm sorry to say it gets much worse. In the 1930's and 1940s, in the
North West Frontier Province of what is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Wolfgang Bornath wrote on Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 04:49:36AM +0100 :
> Sorry to bother you, but we were discussing whether there will be a
> future for MandrakeSoft.
> After tonight I wonder whether there will be a future for us all and
> the world as we
On Wednesday 29 January 2003 02:43 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I would put forth, that if Bush collected the majority of the electoral
> votes, that Occam's razor would tell us that he also collected the majority
> of the popular votes since the electoral votes are based upon the popular
> vote.
Title: RE: [expert] OT Will there be a tomorrow?
One of the beautiful things about America & the freedoms within - filing for bankruptcy protection. . . .
Now that's madness!
-Original Message-
From: Wolfgang Bornath [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 2
I would put forth, that if Bush collected the majority of the electoral votes,
that Occam's razor would tell us that he also collected the majority of the
popular votes since the electoral votes are based upon the popular vote.
Consider this case:
A large state such as California had 1,000,000 v
On Thu, 2003-01-30 at 06:29, Mark Weaver wrote:
> and you know this how? please...proof of this would be interesting.
Check the mainstream human rights websites :-) Even if American
personal are not directly involved, they know full well what happens
when they hand prisoners over to their comrad
he biggest
influencer in the war's outcome.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ronald J. Hall
Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 1:40 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [expert] OT Will there be a tomorrow?
On Wednesday 29 Januar
On Thu, 2003-01-30 at 03:54, Chuck Burns wrote:
> We never SIGNED kyoto, because it was nothing more than a ploy to LOOK GOOD to
> ecologists. The WORST polluting countries are the 3rd world countries with
> NO environmental protection agencies, and the Kyoto treaty left them alone,
> so, of c
On Wed, 2003-01-29 at 08:18, Dallam Wych wrote:
> > > > I'm not religious, I wish I were. This madman and the options he has
> > > > scare me to death.
>
> > > > wobo
>
> I guess that perhaps is the way America and the uk feel when they
> hear your chancellor repetively refer "the german way". Ta
On Wednesday 29 January 2003 02:17 pm, Wolfgang Bornath wrote:
> In case you don't know it yet: Pearl Harbour was attacked by the
> Japaneze. They are the slightly smaller men with (mostly) slanted eyes
> and live on some islands across the Pacific Ocean to the West of you.
Thats exactly what I s
On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 13:39 -0500, Ronald J. Hall wrote:
> On Wednesday 29 January 2003 02:11 am, Wolfgang Bornath wrote:
>
> > Totally different situation. The American president and the congress
> > did not want to go to war against Germany because a lot of large US
> > companies were tied up
On Wednesday 29 January 2003 12:14 pm, Praedor Tempus Atrebates wrote:
> of US citizens with contrary views to those of the court-appointed US
> president and his apologists - I count several besides myself in this list
> thus far. Not all Americans respond with reflex support for what the
> curre
New flick, coming to a theatre of war soon:
The Bush Administration
In Association With
The Other Bush Administration
Presents
Gulf Wars__
E P I S O D E I I
Clone Of The Attack
See the full movie poster:
http://www.goshko.ca/downloads/jokes/
On Wednesday 29 January 2003 02:11 am, Wolfgang Bornath wrote:
> Totally different situation. The American president and the congress
> did not want to go to war against Germany because a lot of large US
> companies were tied up with Germany (mostly with the IG Farben
> conglomerate). The Jewish e
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 29 January 2003 12:45 pm, Franki wrote:
[...]
> believe it or not.. often a dictator is better economically then a
> democracy (at least initially).. simply because the leader need not worry
> about public opinion.. but that certainly does
nion.. but that certainly doesn't make it right...
rgds
Frank
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mick Szucs
Sent: Thursday, 30 January 2003 1:35 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [expert] OT Will there be a tomorrow?
On Wed, 2003-01
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 29 January 2003 12:24 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I wish you people would quit cluttering my mailbox with all this crap.
> There are other lists where this would be appropriate.
>
> "Franki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote ..
>
> > first of a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 29 January 2003 12:23 pm, Mark Weaver wrote:
> Wolfgang Bornath wrote:
[...]
> > Last polls in USA show that nearly half of the American people don't
> > want war against Iraq in any case. In Germany our chancellor wouldn't
> > get away wi
Sascha Noyes wrote:
On Wednesday 29 January 2003 09:54 am, Chuck Burns wrote:
On Wed, January 29 2003 8:43 am, tarvid wrote:
*snip*
Bush chooses internationalism when it suits him.
He scuttled Kyoto, ABM and the Biological weapons protocols and ignores
the Viena and Geneva conventions.
So,
On Wed, 2003-01-29 at 12:18, Franki wrote:
> maybe they are learning.. albiet slowly..
>
> They did not put a dictator in charge of afganistan... they tried to start a
> democracy if memory serves...
Poor wording on my part - I was referring to the Millions of dollars in
aid, weapons and training
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Lyvim Xaphir
Sent: Thursday, 30 January 2003 1:14 AM
To: ExpertMandrake-List
Subject: Re: [expert] OT Will there be a tomorrow?
On Wed, 2003-01-29 at 11:14, Wolfgang Bornath wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 10:53 -0500, Lyvim Xap
Wolfgang Bornath wrote:
On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 13:18 +, Dallam Wych wrote:
I guess that perhaps is the way America and the uk feel when they
hear your chancellor repetively refer "the german way". Talk about
scarey stuff, deja vu.
When did Mr. Schroeder say something like "the German way
On Wednesday 29 January 2003 18:23, Dallam Wych wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 06:02:21PM +0100, Steffen Barszus wrote:
> > Sorry that I did not checked if your reply-to header is set right. I know
> > it is bad behavior and you would know it that I know it after reading my
> > sig.
> >
> >
> > S
On Wednesday 29 January 2003 11:32 am, Sascha Noyes wrote:
> The terms "socialist" and "liberal" are mutually exclusive.
>
> Sascha Noyes
so that is your final say on that? or how do you realy feel?
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 29 January 2003 11:57 am, Alfredo C. López wrote:
> El Mié 29 Ene 2003 11:54, Chuck Burns escribió:
> > We never SIGNED kyoto, because it was nothing more than a ploy to LOOK
> > GOOD to ecologists. The WORST polluting countries are the 3
to propose and act
> on
> actions decided upon by the commitee..
>
> That way, the best minds are the ones making the important decisions, not
> politicians..
>
> rgds
>
> Franki
>
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROT
On Wed, 2003-01-29 at 11:14, Wolfgang Bornath wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 10:53 -0500, Lyvim Xaphir wrote:
> > That's right, Chuck; that's exactly what you would expect from a
> > brainwashed socialist liberal with absolutely no facts on their side
> > except for worthless emotional outbursts
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 29 January 2003 11:46 am, Alan Wilter Sousa da Silva wrote:
> I beg your all pardon but I could not keep my fingers away from the
> keyboard after such a stupid things written below.
[...]
> Pardon Praedor, but I could not help myself cons
AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [expert] OT Will there be a tomorrow?
On Wed, 2003-01-29 at 11:29, Franki wrote:
> Those who do not heed the past are destined to repeat it.. so he is at
least
> making an effort to stop something before it happens now.. history is full
> of cases where
On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 06:02:21PM +0100, Steffen Barszus wrote:
> Sorry that I did not checked if your reply-to header is set right. I know it
> is bad behavior and you would know it that I know it after reading my sig.
> So I need to update kmail ;) . My intend was to quote the text you have
>
liticians..
rgds
Franki
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Alfredo C. López
Sent: Thursday, 30 January 2003 12:34 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [expert] OT Will there be a tomorrow?
Hi!
I'm a guy living in Argentina, far
ow it that I know it after reading my sig.
> - Forwarded message from Steffen Barszus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
>
> > Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2003 15:12:21 +0100
> > From: Steffen Barszus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: [e
El Mié 29 Ene 2003 11:54, Chuck Burns escribió:
> We never SIGNED kyoto, because it was nothing more than a ploy to LOOK GOOD
> to ecologists. The WORST polluting countries are the 3rd world countries
> with NO environmental protection agencies, and the Kyoto treaty left them
> alone, so, of cours
On Wed, 2003-01-29 at 11:29, Franki wrote:
> Those who do not heed the past are destined to repeat it.. so he is at least
> making an effort to stop something before it happens now.. history is full
> of cases where no action was taken till it was too late.. who knows, he
> might actually stop the
On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 11:34:31AM -0500, Sascha Noyes wrote:
> The only reason that he posted privately (by error) is that you have got a
> "reply to" set while discussing on a mailing list.
> Sorry, but that is your fault.
I don't think so, I think it is a kmail thing. It isn't my mutts
fault t
I beg your all pardon but I could not keep my fingers away from the
keyboard after such a stupid things written below.
First, Bush (and I put him apart from USA because America, despite
elected him, is greater than that asshole) never signed Kyoto Protocol,
but USA (Clinton) had previously signed
Keep talking sonny. Oh, that is until the terrorists come and bomb your
insignificant little cities like Aarhus, Copenhagen ...etc. Then, just
maybe THAT will change your mind.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Wolfgang Bornath
Sent: Tuesda
On Wednesday 29 January 2003 11:29 am, Franki wrote:
> 3. Oil, I don't recall hearing that the Oil fields that the US liberated in
> Desert storm are now owned by the US did I miss some important news
> flyer here??? who is running Kuwait now??? I wasn't aware it was the
No oil fields were t
Behalf Of Wolfgang Bornath
> Sent: Wednesday, 29 January 2003 8:59 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [expert] OT Will there be a tomorrow?
>
> On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 20:15 +0800, Franki wrote:
> > Once hitler was in charge.. there was nothing even remotely like
> > d
PROTECTED]>
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: [expert] OT Will there be a tomorrow?
> >
> > On Wednesday 29 January 2003 14:18, Dallam Wych wrote:
> > > > How much have you understood what war means ? How much are you
> > > > informed what
On Wed, 2003-01-29 at 10:36, Praedor Tempus Atrebates wrote:
> There is a little thing of lost oil field control by US oil companies as a
> result of all the Desert Storm, etc, ugliness. Bush would love nothing more
> than to install a friendly leader in Iraq who would then turn over the oil
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 29 January 2003 10:53 am, Lyvim Xaphir wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-01-29 at 09:38, Chuck Burns wrote:
> > On Wed, January 29 2003 8:32 am, Wolfgang Bornath wrote:
> > *snip*
> >
> > > Yes, I know that one and I just love it.
> > > It's a very go
On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 11:14 -0500, et wrote:
>
> looks like poop... smells like poop, feels like poop, if you think it's not
> poop, then you taste it
In this case I'd rather put it like this:
Looks like poop... smells like poop... feels like poop. Now it's up to
you to believe or not wh
ECTED]]On Behalf Of et
Sent: Wednesday, 29 January 2003 11:49 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [expert] OT Will there be a tomorrow?
Frankl says "To put it simply, we MUSTN'T judge Bush, because we have no
idea
what he knows.."
I say very wrong statement,,, absolute power corr
On Wed, 2003-01-29 at 05:17, Steffen Barszus wrote:
> First of all, this is not the right place to discuss this .. but we had many
> OT-discussions here, why not these...
Wobo had his tit; I had the tat, then offered to take it private. Looks
like it's public anyway. Fine.
> > I don't take k
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 29 January 2003 09:54 am, Chuck Burns wrote:
> On Wed, January 29 2003 8:43 am, tarvid wrote:
> *snip*
>
> > Bush chooses internationalism when it suits him.
> >
> > He scuttled Kyoto, ABM and the Biological weapons protocols and ignores
>
On Wednesday 29 January 2003 11:14 am, Wolfgang Bornath wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 10:53 -0500, Lyvim Xaphir wrote:
> > That's right, Chuck; that's exactly what you would expect from a
> > brainwashed socialist liberal with absolutely no facts on their side
> > except for worthless emotional
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 29 January 2003 10:53 am, Lyvim Xaphir wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-01-29 at 09:38, Chuck Burns wrote:
> > On Wed, January 29 2003 8:32 am, Wolfgang Bornath wrote:
> > *snip*
> >
> > > Yes, I know that one and I just love it.
> > > It's a very go
On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 10:53 -0500, Lyvim Xaphir wrote:
> That's right, Chuck; that's exactly what you would expect from a
> brainwashed socialist liberal with absolutely no facts on their side
> except for worthless emotional outbursts created by the flood of
> brainwash diarrea from the communis
EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [expert] OT Will there be a tomorrow?
> On Wednesday 29 January 2003 14:18, Dallam Wych wrote:
> > > How much have you understood what war means ? How much are you informed
> > > what people here in germany think ? How much are you interested to
On Wed, 2003-01-29 at 09:38, Chuck Burns wrote:
> On Wed, January 29 2003 8:32 am, Wolfgang Bornath wrote:
> *snip*
> > Yes, I know that one and I just love it.
> > It's a very good example of putting the words so extreme that only a
> > very dumb person doesn't realize it's a joke with a very seri
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 29 January 2003 10:35 am, tarvid wrote:
> On Wednesday 29 January 2003 10:07 am, Praedor Tempus Atrebates wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > On Wednesday 29 January 2003 10:08 am, tarvid wrote:
> > > I lik
On Wed, 2003-01-29 at 08:57, Chuck Burns wrote:
> On Wed, January 29 2003 7:55 am, Wolfgang Bornath wrote:
> *snip*
> > BTW: What doo you think is the German way of today? From your
> > statement I doubt that you have any clue.
> I think the Germans are so scared of their OWN past, that they will a
On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 14:56 +, Dallam Wych wrote:
> > BTW: What doo you think is the German way of today? From your
> > statement I doubt that you have any clue.
> In all honesty, I only spend a few weeks a year now in germany as
> opposed to the 1970's when I spent perhaps 3 months out of t
Frankl says "To put it simply, we MUSTN'T judge Bush, because we have no idea
what he knows.."
I say very wrong statement,,, absolute power corrupts absolutely. We MUST
Judge the Government continueally, if we are ever to hope to have a
government "by the people, for the people and of the peopl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Good morning, Wobo...
On Wednesday 29 January 2003 06:37 am, Wolfgang Bornath wrote:
> Looking back I realize that I have made a mistake by opening this
> thread. Sorry folks, I'll start a new one on my experiences with the
> Beta2 of 9.1 in some min
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 29 January 2003 10:27 am, Wolfgang Bornath wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 08:36 -0600, Chuck Burns wrote:
> > FACT: The French have oil contracts with Iraq.
>
> Aha! Now we are seeing some real beef. The French have and the US have
> not
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Good morning, Mike...
On Wednesday 29 January 2003 06:20 am, Mike Veltman wrote:
> And please respect the fact that a lot of europeans have a different view
> of the Irac case.
...as do *SOME* Americans.
Dave
- --
Dave Laird ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
T
On Wednesday 29 January 2003 10:07 am, Praedor Tempus Atrebates wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Wednesday 29 January 2003 10:08 am, tarvid wrote:
> > I like my horse, even though he is over 30 now.
>
> 30?! Wow. What kind of horse is he? Have you retired him to pa
On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 08:38 -0600, Chuck Burns wrote:
> On Wed, January 29 2003 8:32 am, Wolfgang Bornath wrote:
> *snip*
> > Yes, I know that one and I just love it.
> > It's a very good example of putting the words so extreme that only a
> > very dumb person doesn't realize it's a joke with a v
On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 08:36 -0600, Chuck Burns wrote:
> FACT: The French have oil contracts with Iraq.
Aha! Now we are seeing some real beef. The French have and the US have
not? (You may recognize that I'm coming down to your level of arguing
slowly but surely).
> FACT: Nearly all the Iraqi we
1 - 100 of 146 matches
Mail list logo
