On 12 Ago, 09:49, Jason Grout jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
On 7/22/10 2:36 PM, Maurizio wrote:
I have a quick question that is related to engineering support (I was
reading the document you posted on the wiki about sd24, and I see the
roadmap is planning to address those issues
if it may be faster.
Let me know if you want to improve it, we may have a fruitful discussion :)
Maurizio
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit
with this?
Maurizio
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URL: http://www.sagemath.org
in SAGE); I don't know how to hook in
a new window (from the browser) a SAGE console session which is
attached to the session of the notebook. Can anyone help with this?
Maurizio
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email
May there be any official way to explain reciprocally and fix this?
I don't see any reason for not doing some effort in the direction of
cooperation, I don't think there's any problem among the user
communities
Maurizio
On Jul 23, 7:05 am, Jason Grout jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
On 7/22
if they may
help, being even more experienced in contributing to SAGE.
Cheers
Maurizio
On Jul 14, 1:57 am, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 1:42 AM, Maurizio maurizio.gran...@gmail.com wrote:
I just spend a couple of words about IDEs. I've personally spent
Unfortunately, I have no log of this. I think that what we did was to
make it run under the sage -sh shell, so that it was possible to do
from sage import * at the beginning of any python file and achieving
something pretty usable.
Sorry for missing details
Maurizio
On 18 Lug, 02:29, Nicolas M
/scipy, which are
anyway the core toolboxes needed.
Maurizio
I don't know what about outside Europe, but I find so strange that
SAGE is unknown in scientific community, I find it very useful (from
an engineering point of view), and I personally think that may be a
perfect solution
how do you get the new canvas with matplotlib 1.0? I installed it
today, but from matplotlib.rcsetup.all_backends I don't get any item
which looks like html5 canvas
Maurizio
On 14 Lug, 10:03, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 9:42 AM, Maurizio maurizio.gran
SAGE, but I have
no details right now... I should better check!
My 2 cents
Thanks
Maurizio
On 11 Lug, 20:41, Ondrej Certik ond...@certik.cz wrote:
On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 3:20 AM, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
1. IDE's
There are a number of IDEs that can be used for Python
, would be VERY
attractive, at least to many people I know.
Regards
Maurizio
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com
the path recognized by the html page?
the good thing of codemirror, is that it is just a script to be
applied on a textarea within a div: doesn't that already match with
the current status of a cell?
thanks a lot
maurizio
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
I am sorry,
yesterday I started to work on this, but I was working on sage 4.2
today I updated to sage 4.3.2, but I also noticed that in the
beginning of the file cell.py it is stated that it is part of the OLD
sage notebook...
now I should understand where to look again :)
maurizio
On 17 Feb
ok, still me :P
I've found the relevant ticket http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/7501
now I'll try to apply the patch. it seems to me that this is actively
worked on, and there should be some draft code on someone else's
computer, so I am probably not any helpful here.
cheers
maurizio
On 21 Gen, 00:22, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 1:33 PM, Maurizio maurizio.gran...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
even if in the recent times I've been much less involved with SAGE, I
just wanted to point out two pieces of software that I hope could
become
snippets.
http://www.jonobacon.org/2010/01/12/acire-0-2-released/
By all
Maurizio
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http
I honestly didn't get the chance to work with it, but when I installed
sage-mode in emacs, I found it very useful, because it does this
integration of a powerful editor (also sufficiently newbie friendly)
with a sage embedded terminal
Try sage-mode and emacs!! :)
Maurizio
On 17 Nov, 17:31, Jan
Hi,
let me give a quick reference for starting with ppa:
http://blog.bodhizazen.net/linux/launchpad-ppa-tips/
regards
Maurizio
On Oct 24, 5:30 pm, Jason Grout jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
The IRC logs show a recent conversation (again) about Sage packaging for
Ubuntu. We all know
I have not taken any offense, on the contrary!
Thank you very much for your detailed answer.
Maurizio
On Oct 27, 10:41 pm, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 1:58 PM, Maurizio maurizio.gran...@gmail.com wrote:
What about adopting a simpler strategy?
What do you
for discussing this
Regards
Maurizio
On 27 Ott, 17:54, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 1:36 AM, Minh Nguyen nguyenmi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi folks,
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 5:22 AM, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I wonder why everybody
Thank you Rob,
you seem to have caught my point 100%, I completely agree with your
comments
Maurizio
On Oct 26, 1:06 am, Rob Beezer goo...@beezer.cotse.net wrote:
We have a Sage server on our campus. We don't have departmental
sysadmins, instead it is maintained by the same folks who do
this amount of changes can be discussed openly, and that everybody can
help in this process.
Regards
Maurizio
On 26 Ott, 20:37, Nick Alexander ncalexan...@gmail.com wrote:
On 26-Oct-09, at 11:22 AM, William Stein wrote:
Hi,
I wonder why everybody (*) making suggestions has never put together
current version?
Best regards
Maurizio
On 25 Ott, 15:48, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 10:17 PM, Robert Bradshaw
rober...@math.washington.edu wrote:
On Oct 24, 2009, at 7:10 PM, Jason Grout wrote:
mhampton wrote:
One thing that was mentioned on another
that
there is also much more support on Internet, because of the wide
adoption.
My 2 cents
Maurizio
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
goes wrong because of a simple bug, and discovering it
just one day before the deadline (if not worse!).
I hope this will be useful to the community.
Best regards
Maurizio
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
for netlists. Maybe you could introduce the mechanical
equivalent of those :)
Regards
Maurizio
On 23 Ott, 22:05, kstueve kevin.stu...@gmail.com wrote:
Have any of you heard of Erik Neumann? He published some excellent
Java physics demos athttp://www.myphysicslab.com/ He is in Seatle,
and has
Maurizio
On 17 Ott, 00:04, Dorian Raymer deldo...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello everyone,
We have merged a big development effort into the master
repositoryhttp://github.com/codenode/codenode
!
This represents a milestone in the ongoing effort to bring the whole design
to a new stable point. The Frontend
there, but maybe providing a service like this could
improve the translation process a lot.
Think about that
Regards
Maurizio
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage
wouldn't like to switch back to an old maxima,
so we should at least wait for them fixing it... maybe we can help on
that
regards
Maurizio
On 16 Ott, 22:55, ma...@mendelu.cz ma...@mendelu.cz wrote:
On 16 říj, 22:44, ma...@mendelu.cz ma...@mendelu.cz wrote: I am. I will
write
. Otherwise, thank you for the discussion :)
Maurizio
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group
Can't we take advantage of inheritance for this issue? I don't know
how far that can go, though, I'm not a programmer...
Thanks
Maurizio
On Sep 28, 9:40 am, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 12:11 AM, Maurizio maurizio.gran...@gmail.com wrote:
First of all
, and regards
Maurizio
PS: feel free to ask me for many more insights, if I've not been clear
enough
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel-unsubscr
Wouldn't be better if there was some sort of triangular end which
points to the exact thick (when they are plotted)? Without them, the
slider look a bit approximate or inexact :)
On Sep 18, 6:14 am, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 8:39 PM, Pat LeSmithe
a good thing to do, but I just
keep finding it so easy if I do solve[Tab] so that ALL the functions
related to solving equations are shown (both exact and numerical)
cheers
maurizio
On Sep 17, 4:52 pm, Burcin Erocal bur...@erocal.org wrote:
Hi,
I don't use the solve() function at all. I'm
teams! For example:
the number of elements of the Italian translation team of Ubuntu is
just 16.
Otherwise, I think that the translation process can become VERY
frustrating
My 2 cents
Maurizio
On Sep 9, 9:50 am, Burcin Erocal bur...@erocal.org wrote:
On Tue, 8 Sep 2009 13:55:27 -0700 (PDT
Why don't we close this ticket?
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/4566
There seems to be already a quite reasonable explanation to do this in
its comments
Maurizio
On 4 Set, 15:34, Burcin Erocal bur...@erocal.org wrote:
Hi Jason and anybody interested in symbolics in Sage,
On Fri
? I will have to do this soon anyways if you don't,
since it is needed for the units package.
E.g.,
meter = var('meter', docstring=A meter is..., latex_name=m)
By the way, which is the status of the units package? Is the code
somewhere on the net? I'm quite curious! :)
Regards
Maurizio
to look
at typeset output as well?)
Anyway, if that's so useful (as I hope) it looks reasonable to me to
make this more accessible to other people, or at least more
advertised! :)
Thanks and regards
Maurizio
On 30 Ago, 12:32, Pierre pierre.guil...@gmail.com wrote:
Maurizio, you should try emacs
On 29 Ago, 19:21, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 4:30 AM, Maurizio maurizio.gran...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi!
I have a question.
Would you please consider adding a feature in the notebook, if you
happen to work on this?
My desire would be to have
much work (as I hope), I think this could help a lot
people coming from MatLab.
Thanks
Maurizio
On 28 Ago, 00:38, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 1:39 PM, Minh Nguyennguyenmi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi folks,
The Sage notebook is about to get an overhaul
would like very much to have units supported in symbolic equations:
eq1 = x^2 + 2m * x + 1 m^2 = 0
solve(eq1) - x = -1 m
:)
Regards
Maurizio
PS: that will result very useful, I appreciate that you accept
suggestions if you don't work everyday with this stuff
On 12 Ago, 17:15, Dr. David Kirkby
That's great! Congratulations!
maurizio
On 4 Ago, 18:09, Golam Mortuza Hossain gmhoss...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 1:02 PM, Nick Alexanderncalexan...@gmail.com wrote:
Can you pattern match on it? It's really irritating to do subs/
pattern matching on the existing
such an appreciable initiative. I hope that it relies on well
spread standards like SPICE or SPECTRE netlist
Thanks for focusing on this as well :)
Maurizio
On Jul 26, 10:24 pm, David Joyner wdjoy...@gmail.com wrote:
This seems interesting.
I teach circuits and networks every semester as an application
that is wonderful!!
by the way, I am looking forward to see those LTI and Fourier
Transform features applied to our powerful symbolic system :D
Maurizio
On Jul 26, 9:23 pm, Rafael Cardoso Dias Costa rfc...@gmail.com
wrote:
The problem is solved!
http://www.sagenb.org/home/pub/677/
Thanks
with some derivatives we are not going to
support in the long term (integrals are going to take a lot of time
probably).
My 2 cents
best regards
Maurizio
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from
everybody.
Regards
Maurizio
On Jul 18, 2:57 pm, Minh Nguyen nguyenmi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Golam,
On Sat, Jul 18, 2009 at 10:49 PM, Golam Mortuza
Hossaingmhoss...@gmail.com wrote:
SNIP
I could implement above rather easily by exposing underlying Ginac
feature. However, I am not sure
similar physical problems, that would take
advantage of plotting deltas.
Thanks again
Maurizio
On 23 Giu, 19:02, Golam Mortuza Hossain gmhoss...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks David, Tim, Burcin!
Correct me if I have missed your points. With your suggestions
here is the new conventions
As a clarification of what I was talking about, see this:
http://mathworld.wolfram.com/ImpulsePair.html
Regards
Maurizio
On 23 Giu, 23:45, Maurizio maurizio.gran...@gmail.com wrote:
Many kudos for this!
Honestly, I don't actually know whether it means that much, but at
this point I think
I agree. We could do something like plotting all the deltas with a
stem plot and then superimposing the rest of the plot
Maurizio
On 24 Giu, 04:21, David Roe r...@math.harvard.edu wrote:
One way would be to have a vertical ray that doesn't change the scaling of
the rest of the graph (just
still pending, or it has been done, so that
some documentation to new design could be helpful, given that Dirac
delta implementation should rely on that.
Thanks
Maurizio
On 17 Giu, 13:56, Burcin Erocal bur...@erocal.org wrote:
Hi Golam,
On Wed, 17 Jun 2009 07:38:16 -0300
Golam Mortuza Hossain
sol[Tab]
I get all the functions related to solving an equation, whatever the
domain.
Regards
Maurizio
On 15 Giu, 17:08, Jason Grout jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
paramaniac wrote:
Dear Sage Developers,
It would be very nice if Sage supported the element-wise
multiplication of matrices
. Is there any guideline for Sphinx syntax?
If the current documentation is not there, which is the most updated
source?
Moreover, how are the available translations made public? I don't see
any advertisement.
Thanks
Regards
Maurizio
On 22 Mag, 09:10, Franco Saliola sali...@gmail.com wrote
people to fall into
SAGE by looking for something else in google :)
I know this looks pretty useless, since nowadays everybody should
speak English, yet I know universities are still full of people not
necessarily fluent in English.
Regards
Maurizio
are really willing to listen for them.
Regards
Maurizio
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group
on
building something on top of it. I am not even sure if something in
Pynac engine is not going under some rewriting or development. But I
think that 4.0 is coming soon!
I would be glad to hear your impressions and to be updated on your
work :)
Regards
Maurizio
On 2 Mag, 20:53, Golam Mortuza
make a big step forward,
once its community focuses on this task!
Thanks a lot
Maurizio
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
Regards
Maurizio
On Apr 21, 1:12 am, mabshoff mabsh...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Apr 20, 1:12 pm, Maurizio maurizio.gran...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Burcin, thanks for replying!
SNIP
I don't know what about those algorithms, but it seems to me that
SymPy already implements some good heuristics
thank you for clarifying this, I didn't know that sympy was already
pretty well working with the new symbolics
I hope this has at least given some information to the community as
well! I always learn a lot from these discussions
Regards
Maurizio
On 21 Apr, 22:58, Jason Grout jason-s
patches
upstream, and move forward if needed.
Regards and many thanks
Maurizio
On Apr 20, 12:57 am, Ondrej Certik ond...@certik.cz wrote:
On Sun, Apr 19, 2009 at 4:20 PM, root d...@axiom-developer.org wrote:
So we have a good start to implement the Risch algorithm in sympy already.
Ondrej
phase? That
probably requires more computer science and less math than the second
phase.
Indeed, this was what I tried to say in those comments about
integration that got Maurizio started on this track.
There are descriptions of heuristics we can use in the maxima manual [1]
and the book
this one I'm looking at right now) is
fun :)
Regards
Maurizio
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit
Nice! :)
On 19 Apr, 16:42, Pat LeSmithe qed...@gmail.com wrote:
In case there's interest... It's possible to embed any web page into an
output cell with a bit of client-side mischief:
http://www.sagenb.org/home/pub/464/
Since this uses cell_div_output_*, the embeds won't respond to
Science task, which is not really my field.
If I look at my first aim (Laplace and Fourier transforms...) I can
see a long way to cover, hopefully in the shortest time frame!
Regards
Maurizio
On 19 Apr, 17:10, Martin Musatov marty.musa...@gmail.com wrote:
Aha! Quite the challenge
be carried on with maxima or pynac. Can you help
me?
Thank you very much
Regards
Maurizio
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
Thanks for the answer.
As the time goes, I get more understanding of the complexity of the
problem (much more than I expected at first).
On 19 Apr, 02:27, Carl Witty carl.wi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 2:46 PM, Maurizio maurizio.gran...@gmail.com wrote:
Could you be clearer
a better way, at least to convert a
polynomials to a symbolic expression... Is there?
I know this is not leading anywhere... but thank you for your time! :)
Regards
Maurizio
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
in the past (something with maxima, something with
SymPy, I think, all through SAGE), but I think that I found the way to
do it pretty easily browsing the old reference manual...
Thanks a lot
Maurizio
PS: delta of dirac is already in SymPy (
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=672can
copy, if and only if the user decide to discard the changes? I know
this is not really the standard way software are designed, but this
seems to make sense to me.
Regards
Maurizio
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
One question: is there any plan to replace expand(), factor() and
other functions like these? I don't see them mentioned in the todo,
and I always find their usage so much time consuming...
Thanks
Maurizio
On Mar 29, 1:47 pm, Burcin Erocal bur...@erocal.org wrote:
Hi,
I put up a preliminary
object).
Yes, the problem is that I found them quite slow, even though this
could arise from complex expressions. Unfortunately, I have not any
commercial software to compare with. Should I compare it with
evaluation time from working directly within maxima?
Maurizio
On Mar 30, 4:24 pm, William Stein
to do simple operations (am I
wrong) like expand(), factor(), collect() and others (especially
expand, as you could see!)
Many, many thanks
Maurizio
On Mar 30, 4:44 pm, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 7:29 AM, Maurizio maurizio.gran...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm sorry
On Mar 30, 5:36 pm, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 8:08 AM, Maurizio maurizio.gran...@gmail.com wrote:
I would really like to not have to annoy you with this stuff, but I
really think I'm missing something important (and useful!!)
The first thing I have
Some time ago, I was annoying you guys for issues with transforms and
stuff like that.
On 20 Mar, 01:35, Maurizio maurizio.gran...@gmail.com wrote:
So, up to now, my wishlist is:
- better Laplace, Fourier, Zeta, any othertransformmanagement
(especially in symbolic)
- unit of measurement
as a possible enhancement. This would be really useful to
improve notebook usability.
At the very end, I'm afraid we would be implementing something like
Notepad++ (just an example) within the browser... Isn't there any
firefox plugin or stuff like that to directly provide this?
Thanks
Maurizio
On 28 Mar
those improvements I was
talking about in the previous posts
Regards
Maurizio
On 29 Mar, 15:38, Jaap Spies j.sp...@hccnet.nl wrote:
Jason Grout wrote:
Maurizio wrote:
Let me throw this stone, it's just something that pops into my mind
now: do you know what simulink is? That is a unique
this discussion useful for the
future.
Best regards
Maurizio
On 23 Mar, 22:37, Maurizio maurizio.gran...@gmail.com wrote:
People,
I'm really glad about having brought this discussion to a reasonably
interesting level.
From now on, I can't give any other comment (I can't deal with code so
of removing stuff for engineers,
how could this help them (I should say, us)? I think good examples and
documentation would be SO MUCH better to have!
My 2 cents
Maurizio
On 25 Mar, 16:09, rjf fate...@gmail.com wrote:
I think that you probably miss the point. Most engineers are not
trained
give your comments
Regards and thanks everybody
Maurizio
On 23 Mar, 21:03, Robert Bradshaw rober...@math.washington.edu
wrote:
On Mar 22, 2009, at 6:49 AM, Darren Dale wrote:
On Mar 20, 10:31 pm, Jason Grout jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
Maurizio wrote:
Not yet... I think I
/contrib/
Thank you very much
Maurizio
On 23 Mar, 16:16, Robert Dodier robert.dod...@gmail.com wrote:
Minh Nguyen wrote:
As regards a Maxima package for z transform, I think Alasdair McAndrew
has written such a package about 2 years ago.
More recently I've written some z-transform code which
maxima guys
at least made z transform available, but I think we should at least
consider taking some advantage from their open source code, especially
if we are now working so hard in our own symbolic package.
Could pynac take advantage of this?
Regards
Maurizio
-quantities-developers
Thanks
Maurizio
-- Forwarded message --
From: Maurizio Granato maurizio.gran...@gmail.com
Date: Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 2:39 PM
Subject: Quantities chance to spread
To: python-quantities-develop...@lists.launchpad.net
Hello guys,
I'm Maurizio, an electronic
I've opened a question on their launchpad project:
https://answers.edge.launchpad.net/python-quantities/+question/64894
I hope you guys share my feelings, so that I've been a good ambassador
Regards
Maurizio
On 21 Mar, 19:28, Jason Grout jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
Maurizio wrote
I agree... but what about magnitude and argument of the complex
number? I find this representation often more useful than real and
imaginary, so I think it's just a matter of the application.
+1 from me
Maurizio
On 21 Mar, 22:28, Henryk Trappmann bo198...@googlemail.com wrote:
As I see
it.
Thanks
Maurizio
On 19 Mar, 22:05, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I implementing the feature in the notebook before where it lists all
users when you click on Share. I thought this was nice, since you
could chose the ones you want. There are now 6598 users at
sagenb.org, which
:
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 2:14 PM, Maurizio maurizio.gran...@gmail.com wrote:
I know this is not being polite from me, but would you also consider
implementing folders in SAGE notebook?
I would really appreciate, since the number of my notebooks is growing
fast, and I'm wondering how you
all the other facts?
Thanks
Maurizio
On 19 Mar, 23:48, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 3:45 PM, Maurizio maurizio.gran...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
can anyone give an advice on how to adapt Quantities to let it be
compatible with SAGE? I don't know how SAGE
(or feets, or anything else)...
Regards
Maurizio
On 16 Mar, 00:55, fergusno...@gmail.com fergusno...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for emailing me Nicolas.
I had a quick play with writing a units extension really just to learn
more about SAGE. I've only just started writing this so its still
()
x2 = 1.01 m
PS: locking property could also be specified when instantiating an
object
2) changing the standard metric system (imperial / SI / any other) so
that by default each value is scaled as previously proposed
Any comment?
Thanks
Maurizio
On 16 Mar, 16:06, Robert Dodier robert.dod
if the other opportunities
out there (there are at least three, as you can see in the trac
ticket) have been previously explored to take some advantage! There
are non-trivial issues like compound units management that may have
already been successfully faced.
Regards
Maurizio
By the way
Thank you Jason, I'll try it as soon as possible.
By the way, have you got any idea about where in the code should I
look at to let it work with SAGE numbers? Something like constructors
or stuff like that?
Thanks
Maurizio
On 15 Mar, 02:29, Jason Grout jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote
their work, and this is (in my opinion) going
to be a VERY BIG PLUS for SAGE!!
I mean, I don't think anything out there is actually able to manage
symbolics and units at the same time, do you?
I'm very eager to see your comments, hoping that you get my passion
and enthusiasm!
Best regards
Maurizio
, before
running the notebook?
Thank you
Maurizio
Maurizio
On 14 Mar, 09:21, Jason Grout jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
Maurizio wrote:
Hello,
I'm forwarding this to sage-devel as well, maybe being the most
appropriate group to address this issue.
I'm a happy user of SAGE, and I
not proposing this package over others (for example,
Unum looks very mature, but outdated), I'm just asking if one of you
can spend some minutes to review our trac ticket about units of
measurement (#3852), and to take some other decision about it.
Thank you so much
Maurizio
Is anybody interested in looking at this?
Thank you very much
On 8 Mar, 20:14, Maurizio maurizio.gran...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I was able to reproduce this in Sage 3.3
var('a b c')
first = a + b + c
first._operands[0]._operands[0] is a
True
second = loads(dumps(first))
second
this is really meaningful to me, and a very positive feedback from
this wonderful community
thanks!
On 10 Mar, 21:24, Georg S. Weber georgswe...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi,
trac ticket #5466 now has a positive review.
Cheers,
gsw
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post
this bug, but it seems definitely something
worth it, don't you think?
Thank you
Maurizio
On 27 Feb, 10:35, Kenny masso.ke...@gmail.com wrote:
Sorry... i forgot to display the results:
+ True
+ False
That means thebugis in thedumpor the load function!
On Feb 27, 10:33 am, Kenny masso.ke
would love to have something like this or anything else (I mentioned
the Post integration formula) to enhance the laplace transform (which
is really important to me)
Thanks
Maurizio
On 7 Mar, 22:17, Burcin Erocal bur...@erocal.org wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, 7 Mar 2009 01:19:05 -0800 (PST)
clinton bowen
, matrix operations ( + * **(-1) ),
matrix augmentation (augment), and then matrix extraction of elements
(by column and row index)
Any other info is needed? Hopefully this can fix an undiscovered bug,
or at least fix my mistake (which maybe can be helpful as well to the
community!)
Maurizio
On 27
think?
In case you agree, we would really appreciate some feedback about how
to speedup a bit the SAGE functions.
Regards
Maurizio
On 26 Feb, 11:56, Jason Grout jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
Maurizio wrote:
Hi all,
as you know, Kenny and me recently worked on a notebook demo to show
!!
Maurizio
On 27 Feb, 21:05, Robert Bradshaw rober...@math.washington.edu
wrote:
I do know that matplotlib works with dynamic backends, so I would
imagine it would be able to do the job without a constantly poling
the server.
On Feb 27, 2009, at 11:59 AM, Kenny wrote:
I think I'm
1 - 100 of 125 matches
Mail list logo
