lto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Monday, 22 November, 2004
23.44To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re:
[TruthTalk] Two Covenants
Thanks for responding. I read several commentators views and only
one thought it was actually a physical mark. The article you sent was
i
In a message dated 11/23/2004 4:46:25 AM Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The Midrash, I think, merely sated that
Cain had no previous event upon which to base the severity of his action...
and this may very well be true.However, in trying to read the best out
of
Scripture speaks often about the nations coming to Israel. The mixed
multitude that came out of Egypt andthe foreigner or stranger who dwells
among Israel were all to be considered as though native born. I do not think it
would be fair to say God ignored the nations by giving Israel a
PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Terry
CliftonSent: Sunday, 21 November, 2004 22.13To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Two
Covenants
No concern for
hidden agendas. I just don't know what to say that would not be
speculation. Since Adam was the first man, any o
Amen Sladerino!
- Original Message -
From:
Slade
Henson
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: November 22, 2004 05:55
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Two
Covenants
Scripture speaks often about the nations coming to Israel. The mixed
multitude that came out of Egypt
From: Slade Henson
Scripture speaks often about the nations coming to
Israel. The mixed multitude that came out of Egypt andthe foreigner or
stranger who dwells among Israel were all to be considered as though native
born.
jt: Is 'native born' where it is at Slade? I think
Slade Henson wrote:
Scripture speaks often about the nations coming
to Israel. The mixed multitude that came out of Egypt andthe foreigner
or stranger who dwells among Israel were all to be considered as though
native born. I do not think it would be fair to say God ignored the
In a message dated 11/22/2004 2:56:27 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Scripture speaks often about the nations coming to Israel. The mixed multitude that came out of Egypt and the foreigner or stranger who dwells among Israel were all to be considered as though native born. I
John S. wrote:
I don't worry at all about libel, David.
You don't worry that you might have written a false witness against your
brother in Christ? [scratching my head and wrinkling my eyebrows] Please
consider thanking me for the correction. A wise man loves the one who
rebukes him.
Peace
Hello, Laura
I've always wondered what the mark was as
well. I've heard some people erroneously say it is dark skin. Others a lightning
bolt like Harry Potter (or some other insignia).
The term for mark [in Hebrew] is
Ot. In the KJV, it's usedas such: sign (x60),
token (x14), ensign (x2),
In a message dated 11/22/2004 8:38:36 PM Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I've always wondered what the mark was as
well. I've heard some people erroneously say it is dark skin. Others a
lightning bolt like Harry Potter (or some other insignia).
The term for mark
Jeff wrote:
... as I said before, it allows one to make any passage
of Scripture say what ever is in that persons personal
agenda.
David Miller wrote:
You are doing the very thing you warn against. ...
Jeff wrote:
In this instance, NO. I pulled verses from throughout the letter
to the Romans,
Or do you not know, brethren (for I am speaking to those who
know the law [Torah]), that the law [Torah] has jurisdiction over a person as long as he lives?
For the married woman is bound by law [Torah] to her
husband while he is living; but if her husband dies, she is released from the
law
I have already pulled on my hair several times while
on this forum. But, I stop myself from responding at
times. I go on and read other messages and go back to
the message that disturbed me so much. I reread it.
Then I reread it again. This way I can know that I am
hearing the person the way they
In a message dated 11/20/2004 6:38:16 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Of course you know that I have
read not only the context, but the entire Bible.
What is this supposed to mean to the rest of us who have equal familiarity with the biblical message? And what does this have
John,
you do realize that this quote is from David Miller,
right?
- Original Message -
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, November 21, 2004
12:19
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Two
Covenants
In a message dated 11/20/2004 6:38:16 PM
David Miller wrote:
Of course you know that I have read not only
the context, but the entire Bible.
John S. wrote:
What is this supposed to mean to the rest of us who
have equal familiarity with the biblical message?
It means that you don't need all the cut and paste verbiage about context
Slade wrote:
Or do you not know, brethren (for I am speaking to those
who know the law [Torah]), that the law [Torah] has jurisdiction
over a person as long as he lives? For the married woman is
bound by law [Torah] to her husband while he is living; but if
her husband dies, she is released from
DAVE In the second paragraph above, you say Torah concerning the
husband, who is sin and death. I have problems with what you are trying to
do here. In the previous sentence where Paul says, she is free from the
law and you define law here as Torah concerning the husband, does this
Torah
In a message dated 11/21/2004 1:53:33 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
By the way, Slade. Considering that you are only a few hours from here,
would you be interested in getting together to talk face to face about these
passages? I could bring a few brothers in Christ and
In a message dated 11/21/2004 1:36:54 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
John S. wrote:
Once again, you have failed to continue a descussion,
preferring, instead, to assert your view of your self as
a backdrop for further and continued monologue.
No, he decided to stop
Et al :
Beginning with post Eden civilization, there existed standards of conduct that God expected of man (other than those related to Jewish history) . Cain was fearful of civilizations not defined in the biblical message except to indicate that they were present in his time. A mark or sign
Slade wrote:
While you look hard for a situation where we are dead
to the [whole] law, I have no such agenda. In fact, my
agenda is opposite. (Yes. I have a bias to keep from
nullifying Torah because Yeshua said that's what He
was all about.)
I clearly have no agenda to look hard for a situation
John S. wrote:
Why don't you ask him why he terminated the
discussion
I don't ask him why because that would change the subject. I'm still here
awaiting his reply. If he leaves the discussion, the reason is clear. He
does not have an answer. I have hope that Jeff will return. Slade and I
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 11/21/2004 1:53:33
PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
By the way, Slade. Considering that you are only a few hours from
here,
would you be interested in getting together to talk face to face about
these
passages? I could
In a message dated 11/21/2004 8:50:12 PM Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Cain was
fearful of civilizations not defined in the biblical message except to
indicate that they were present in his time. A mark or sign
was given to Cain to protect him
I think it would be
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Et al :
Beginning with post Eden civilization, there existed standards of
conduct that God expected of man (other than those related to Jewish
history) . Cain was fearful of civilizations not defined in the
biblical message except to indicate that they were present
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Terry Clifton
Sent: Sunday, November 21, 2004
7:51 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Two
Covenants
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
In a message
dated 11/21/2004 1:53:33 PM Pacific Standard Time
In a message dated 11/21/2004 6:58:02 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I can vouch for that. We had the privilege of spending a short time with David and Caroline and not one punch was thrown by anyone. He is a sweet spirited, mild mannered, generous man who loves the Lord.
In a message dated 11/21/2004 6:59:55 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In a message dated 11/21/2004 8:50:12 PM Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Cain was fearful of civilizations not defined in the biblical message except to indicate that they were present in
John S. wrote:
... but Ruben and pals are no so gracious
Careful about libel, John. I respond to this because Ruben has been a past
participant on this list. I have never heard of Ruben ever punching anyone.
He was the victim once, but not the assailant. In that case, he turned the
other
In a message dated 11/21/2004 7:10:10 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Et al :
Beginning with post Eden civilization, there existed standards of conduct that God expected of man (other than those related to Jewish history) . Cain was fearful of civilizations not defined in
John S. wrote:
Do we claim that the nations of Old Scripture times except
the Jews had no relationship with God, deserted by their creator
or, at best, ignored?
No, we should not claim any such thing. Read Daniel and Isaiah.
Nebuchadnezzar and Cyrus were Gentiles, and Cyrus was even called
In a message dated 11/21/2004 7:45:32 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
John S. wrote:
... but Ruben and pals are no so gracious
Careful about libel, John. I respond to this because Ruben has been a past
participant on this list. I have never heard of Ruben ever punching
In a message dated 11/21/2004 7:49:33 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
John S. wrote:
Do we claim that the nations of Old Scripture times except
the Jews had no relationship with God, deserted by their creator
or, at best, ignored?
No, we should not claim any such thing. Read
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 11/21/2004 7:10:10
PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Et al :
Beginning with post Eden civilization, there existed standards of
conduct that God expected of man (other than those related to Jewish
history) . Cain
..
Kay
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of
ShieldsFamilySent: Friday, 19 November, 2004
23.17To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE:
[TruthTalk] Two Covenants?
Kay, dont feel
bad. My husband occasionally gets the same urge
That should read: J The Elder
:0
- Original Message -
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 19, 2004
23:08
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Two
Covenants?
In a message dated 11/19/2004 11:00:16 AM
Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL
] Two Covenants?
myth (it is not
possible givn the NT nature of God's reign)
On Fri, 19 Nov 2004 20:02:07 -0700 "Bill Taylor" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
||
On Fri, 19 Nov 2004 05:56:00 -0500 "Slade Henson" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
write
al Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Friday, 19 November, 2004
22.56To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re:
[TruthTalk] Two Covenants?
myth (it is not
possible givn the NT nature of God's reign)
On Fri, 1
:
[TruthTalk] Two Covenants?
myth (there
aren't two or more definitions--that's the beauty of biblical
language)
On Sat, 20 Nov 2004 10:34:13 -0500 "Slade Henson" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
Perhaps in your definition of Kingdom... but that's the beauty of
myth (re: the
Prophets, JC, the Ap Paul andthe KoG, a definition emerges--not
definitions)
On Sat, 20 Nov 2004 14:50:38 -0500 "Slade Henson" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
..the power of opinion supercedes Biblical definitions
.
--
slade
||
16.19To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re:
[TruthTalk] Two Covenants?
myth (re: the
Prophets, JC, the Ap Paul andthe KoG, a definition emerges--not
definitions)
On Sat, 20 Nov 2004 14:50:38 -0500 "Slade Henson" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
..the power of opinion supercede
who is
it?
On Sat, 20 Nov 2004 18:24:12 -0500 "Slade Henson" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
You
are arguing with someone who's been arguing the point you're
arguing.
Jeff wrote:
You must include Romans 7:7-8:3 at the very least.
And the whole book to grasp the context of this Epistle.
That is why I dislike Cut and Paste Theology, as I said
before, it allows one to make any passage of Scripture
say what ever is in that persons personal agenda.
You are doing the
hahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahhaha
--slade
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Saturday, 20 November, 2004
19.43To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re:
[TruthTalk] Two
Jeff in red:
- Original Message -
From: "David Miller" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, November 20, 2004 20:02
Subject: [TruthTalk] Two Covenants
Jeff
wrote: You must include Romans 7:7-8:3 at the very
least. And the whole book to grasp t
PROTECTED]Sent: Saturday, 20 November, 2004
19.43To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re:
[TruthTalk] Two Covenants?
who is
it?
On Sat, 20 Nov 2004 18:24:12 -0500 "Slade Henson" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
You are arguing with someone who's been argu
Isnt that what were supposed to do on TT? Iz
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Slade Henson
Sent: Saturday, November 20, 2004
5:24 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Two
Covenants?
This has been the most retarded set of
posts
My
wife called me yesterday on my way to school and told me about this exchange
(with the "S" word). She was rolling on the floor, so to
speak.
I was
afraid I would return this morning to the disappearance/banning/crucifixion of
Jonathan Hughes. Jonathan... you're still here, right?
I do
jt: I didn't see this yesterday - had to leave the
house early - but I would wholeheartedly second Terry's
motion.
What's wrong with reading the Bible? I never see
you quote it Lance and when Jonathan does he
apologizes. There is something really wrong with this
picture
On Thu, 18 Nov
-
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: November 19, 2004 06:25
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Two
Covenants?
jt: I didn't see this yesterday - had to leave the
house early - but I would wholeheartedly second Terry's
motion.
What's
: Re: [TruthTalk] Two
Covenants?
Slade Henson wrote:
My
wife called me yesterday on my way to school and told me about this exchange
(with the "S" word). She was rolling on the floor, so to
speak.
I
was afraid I would return th
6:05
AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Two
Covenants?
The 'liar' responds:Rather than ask you to
demonstrate wherein lies the lie; I'd like to ask our 'prodigal brother' to
compose a readable, relatively concise outline of the Gospel as he has come to
experience/speak of Him (never IT).W
I'll neither wish nor hope for snow as I understand
that it's absence is work therefore, money. Thanks,
Lance the hopeful
- Original Message -
From:
Bill Taylor
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: November 19, 2004 08:27
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Two
Covenants
Lance writes:
Together we shall attempt to hear so as to see
whether God has anything to teach us from one another.
May I say in closing that, on those occasions when
I've denigrated another's beliefs here in our store
that protracted conversations were rarely
had.
jt: I understand this
On Fri, 19 Nov 2004 07:08:41 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Judyt:I seem to recall having said to you and, to
Linda that I honestly believe both of you to be 'doers' of the Word. I further believe that, not unlike many on TT, it is POSSIBLE
that the 'account you give in
jt: Hi Bill Taylor, it's good to see you are still
around ...
Lance writes:
Question:What is the theological counterpart to
'The Theory of Everything'?
jt: Judy asks: What is the
"theory of everything and why is it important?"
Answer:The Incarnation
jt: Oh Good, you answered your own
CTED]
Sent: November 19, 2004 09:14
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Two
Covenants?
Judy, I think this
is a good example of how we often misunderstand Lance simply because he
talks much like C3PO on Star Wars. I think he was not saying that
you have not
]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: November 19, 2004 09:42
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Two
Covenants?
jt: Thanks for the interpretation Izzy. I used to
post more scripture but stopped because there was never any
response and it was a lot of work finding chapter and
verse even though
:20 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Two
Covenants?
As to 'interpretation':You are correct on the former and
incorrect on the latter.
Ladies both:Your lives carry the day while your 'posts'
SOMETIMES do not. But, so could it be said of us all.(as to the 'posts' part
In a message dated 11/19/2004 2:58:33 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
My wife called me yesterday on my way to school and told me about this exchange (with the "S" word). She was rolling on the floor, so to speak.
I was afraid I would return this morning to the
In a message dated 11/19/2004 3:54:50 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Question:What is the theological counterpart to 'The Theory of Everything'?
Answer:The Incarnation
It is well and wise to think of internal relations. Do not stop with the external. Indwel the Scriptures.
In a message dated 11/19/2004 4:55:05 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
After careful thought, there is no question that I could have chozen a better term to describe Lance;s comment than to call it dog doo doo. From now on, when I read a lie on this list, I will simply call it
In a message dated 11/19/2004 6:24:31 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
As to 'interpretation':You are correct on the former and incorrect on the latter.
Ladies both:Your lives carry the day while your 'posts' SOMETIMES do not. But, so could it be said of us all.(as to the
John writes: I cna think of a number of
scriptures that support the above -- soo, why is it
imcumbant upon Lance to quote them.
Is it not enough that he incorporates the
scriptures as he understands them into his writings?
jt: No, so far as I'm concerned
it's not enough. People
Question:What is the theological
counterpart to 'The Theory of Everything'?
Answer:The Incarnation
It is well and wise to think
of internal relations. Do not stop with the external. Indwel the
Scriptures.
Example of 'internal'
thinking:Slade's post this morning.
I cna think of a
PROTECTED]
Sent: November 19, 2004 09:42
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Two Covenants?
jt: Thanks for the interpretation Izzy. I used to
post more scripture but stopped because there was
never any
response and it was a lot of work finding chapter
and verse even though it is in my heart. If I
A good word, Suzy. Okay! :-) Izzy
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Susan Petersen
Sent: Friday, November 19, 2004 10:51 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Two Covenants?
When I signed up for Truth talk I was under
I think that's what the Jman just
said.
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: November 19, 2004 11:26
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Two
Covenants?
John writes: I cna think of a number
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of ShieldsFamily
Sent: Friday, November 19, 2004
8:02 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Two
Covenants
Seems to me like God used similar
terminology in the Bible, didnt He? Izzy
I'd much rather deal withsomeone
like Terry
Well, King James calls it DUNG
Jeff
- Original Message -
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 19, 2004
10:47
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Two
Covenants?
In a message dated 11/19/2004 4:55:05 AM
Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL
Well said! By the by there's none of this in what church?
- Original Message -
From: Susan Petersen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: November 19, 2004 11:50
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Two Covenants?
When I signed up for Truth talk I was under the
impression that we would
10.48To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re:
[TruthTalk] Two Covenants?In a message dated 11/19/2004 4:55:05 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
After careful thought, there is no question that I could have
chozen a better term to describe Lance;s comment than to call it dog
ubject: RE: [TruthTalk]
Two Covenants?
Question:What is
the theological counterpart to 'The Theory of
Everything'?Answer:The
Incarnation
It
is well and wise to think of internal relations. Do not stop with the
external. Indwel the Scriptures.
Example
of 'internal' thinking:Slade's post th
Susan Petersen wrote:
I am saddened by this. Instead of focussing on God's
Word, there is arguing and tearing down. If we truly
are the body of Christ, we need to start acting like
it. Please stop the finger pointing. You did this.
No, I didn't. or You meant this. No, I didn't.
Let's focus on
PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: November 19, 2004 11:50
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Two Covenants?
When I signed up for Truth talk I was under the
impression that we would be talking about the
Truth(God's Word). And we have done that a little.
But
lately my inbox has been filled
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
ShieldsFamilySent: Friday, November 19, 2004 11:49
AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE:
[TruthTalk] Two Covenants?
Question:What
is the theological counterpart to 'The Theory of
Everything'?Answer:The
Incarnation
It
is well and wise to think o
Serious question: Why? I ask as I wouldn't think that.
- Original Message -
From: Susan Petersen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: November 19, 2004 14:40
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Two Covenants?
I know that a lot of churches have this symptom. But I
would like to think
: Susan Petersen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: November 19, 2004 15:13
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Two Covenants?
Maybe I should have used the word hope instead. And a
lot of my thinking came from an assumption made from
the title of this forum (TT). I assumed that people
Jeff wrote:
Much like the constitution of the USA, God's covenant
has been amended several times. Do we in the USA
have a new constitution today that has replace the original?
Our Constitution was a new Constitution. We ditched England's, taking only
those parts we liked. Nevertheless, yes, I
Thank you Suzy for taking time to consider Romans 7.
Suzy wrote:
There are two different laws talked about in
Chapter 7. One is the law of sin and the other is the
Torah.
Good. I'm with you here. There is the law of God and then there is the law
of sin residing within our members (our body).
I am not against righteous anger. I am talking about
the useless arguing that has been going back and
forth. It does not further us toward our cause of
getting closer to God. I am not talking about the
defense of what people believe. Go for it defend your
faith. Call a person a liar if they are a
f Of Slade
HensonSent: Friday, 19 November, 2004 12.05To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Two
Covenants?
I
think it's pretty deep in the roomsomebody take the dogs out for a
walk
TOO
FUNNY..I'm rolling on the floor AGAIN!!
Kay
-Origin
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Lance
MuirSent: Friday, 19 November, 2004 15.10To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Two
Covenants?
I would appreciate responses on this from bill,
slade john.
This is one (almost) fine
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Two
Covenants?
jt: Hi Bill Taylor, it's good to see you are still
around ...
Lance writes:
Question:What is the theological counterpart to
'The Theory of Everything'?
jt: Judy asks: What is the
"theory of everything and why is it impo
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Hughes Jonathan
Sent: Friday, November 19, 2004
12:59 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Two
Covenants?
Hi Izzy,
Hope this helps:
Wikipedia defines the TOE as: A theory
of everything (TOE
In a message dated 11/19/2004 8:30:47 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
jt: No, so far as I'm concerned it's not enough. People incorporate the scriptures into all kinds of things and take parts of God's Word
out and make it fit their theology or doctrine. We need scripture to
In a message dated 11/19/2004 9:12:47 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I think it's pretty deep in the roomsomebody take the dogs out for a walk
TOO FUNNY..I'm rolling on the floor AGAIN!!
Kay
:-)
J
10:27 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Two
Covenants?
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hughes Jonathan
Sent: Friday, November 19, 2004
12:59 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Two
Covenants?
Hi Izzy,
Hope
19, 2004
10:27 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Two
Covenants?
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Hughes Jonathan
Sent: Friday, November 19, 2004
12:59 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Two
Covenants?
Hi Izzy,
Hope
05:45
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Two
Covenants?
jt: Covenants are bilateral and Covenants can be
broken. There have been more than one. God made Covenant with Noah, the sign
being the rainbow. Obviously you have never done a scriptural study on
the meaning of Covenant. May I safely
Roman 7 starts with the word Or. So to me that means
that you need to back up and get some contextual
clues. I took the time to read Chp. 7 in three
translations(NIV, NASB, and Complete Jewish). And I
read the entire book of Romans. I couldn't stop
reading (only in one tranlation).
In chapter 6
I think that sometimes it is those who do not speak so
much that are the one's with more knowledge. Judy has
given up on you (so to speak). I think maybe it's
just a matter of asking you the right questions. Or
even one question...Could you please explain your one
word response?
I hope that I
And you said you didn't have a way with words.
Suzy
--- Jeff Powers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David,
From the beginning of God’s creation God wanted
nothing more than a personal relationship with man.
But, man chose not to have a relationship with God.
During the rise of civilization,
Lance Muir wrote:
There is but one covenant
(Abrahamic). It is unilateral. It is given by God and brought to
fulfilment by this same God. How? In and through the
obedient/Incarnate/Israelite, Jesus (Immanuel-God with us)
===
Not
is better
off adopting a wait and see mode instead of an attack mode.
Your brother indeed
"L"man
- Original Message -
From:
Terry Clifton
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: November 18, 2004 07:09
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Two
Covenants?
Lance
Suzy,
meet Gary, the master of one word replies. MYTH being the predominant one.
The fact that he wrote about 5 sentences this week is cause for celebration!
I think he just may be coming out of his shell, but it is too soon to tell!
Jeff
Don't get your hopes up. What
There was and, you failed. Seriously though, I
believe you may have approached the opportunity with a bias.
Possible?
- Original Message -
From:
ShieldsFamily
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: November 18, 2004 09:41
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Two
Covenants
No, Terry, stick to your guns! You have
more sense that all of L-mans authors put together. J Izzy
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Lance Muir
Sent: Thursday, November 18, 2004
7:25 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Two
Covenants
1 - 100 of 144 matches
Mail list logo
