you know the one. you're working with subnets of a classful network. let's
say 10.0.0.0. you enter the command ip default-network 10.1.1.0 and what
shows up in the running config is ip route 10.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 10.1.1.0.
Then try as you might, the command no ip route 10.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 10.1.1.0
doe
been fooling around with the B-Link 2 that a particular someone ( whose name
is not supposed to be mentioned here on this list ) sells at what seems to
be a reasonable price.
not looking for specific answers - just a general question - ever get both B
channels to come up? just a yes or no.
( ISDN
This is a notice of equipment available on that well known auction site.
Ignore if you are not interested in acquiring routers for your study.
package of three 2502 token rings routers, with 16/16, IOS 12.1.5, 2 each of
serial cables, TR media filters, and TR MAU's
great way to start out your
""Symon Thurlow"" wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Hey Chuck,
>
> How did that big design go, the one you mentioned on the list a few
> months ago?
>
> Symon
You mean the Never Ending Design? The Nightmare before the CCIE Lab?
Here is a brief rundown. I will say in advance that as all o
""Priscilla Oppenheimer"" wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Wow. Good thing Paul didn't really bring down Group Study and make it so
we
> couldn't have this important discussion! :-) He said it would be down for
> maintenance, but I didn't notice any downtime, (not that I spent the whole
>
""Nate"" wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Guys,
>
>I'm thinking of recommending IP Telephony for our company. I have
> limited knowledge on the subject and I was wondering if any of you are
> experts (or fraction thereof) that could help me make out a project plan
for
> this. Any co
I presume that's 12.2.21a plus image?
from software adviser- all images that support NAT. the numbers below each
image name is the dram and flash required. these are minimums. I concur with
the other writer - more DRAM
IP PLUS 40 c1600-sy40-mz.12.0-21a
10
4
IP PLUS 56 c1600-sy56-mz.12.0-21a
9186a0080094374.shtml#ipnetwork
>
>
>
> ""The Long and Winding Road"" wrote in
> message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > you know the one. you're working with subnets of a classful network.
let's
> > say 10.0.0.0. you enter the command ip d
hey, BT, can you contact me off line please. I have a question regarding the
firmware versions.
thanks.
chuck
--
TANSTAAFL
"there ain't no such thing as a free lunch"
""Biff Terrific"" wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> I used to have those problems only with basic-ni; I upgraded the
Ran into this one again on a router I recently purchased. In searching the
archives for the methodology, I realized I had not documented the procedure
anyplace last time I ran into this last September of so.
The bug: with versions of IOS 12.0, upgrade is impossible. Copy TFTP flash
fails
The fix:
s a mess...
goodnight, all.
--
TANSTAAFL
"there ain't no such thing as a free lunch"
""The Long and Winding Road"" wrote in
message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> been fooling around with the B-Link 2 that a particular someone ( whose
name
> is not supposed
I've waffled on this one before. But lately I've been spending more time
with Soltie ( CCIE Practical Studies, Volume 1 )
Previously, I've said the jury is still out on this one.
Now that I've given Mr. Soltie his due, I am finding this is a very good
book, and well worth considering when choosin
""Richard Campbell"" wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Hi.. I used to use unix syslog server to log the cisco device event. But
> there is no unix box in my new company. Only w2k. May I know is there
any
> syslog software avaiable that I can install in W2k?
check out Beverly Hills Soft
seeing as the CCSI number uses only 2 digits for the date field, did the
program implode as Y2K came and went? ;->
--
TANSTAAFL
"there ain't no such thing as a free lunch"
""Priscilla Oppenheimer"" wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cisco Nuts wrote:
> >
> > Howard,
> >
> > Why in the
the trees were. :->
>
> Priscilla
>
>
> >
> > scott
> >
> > ""Symon Thurlow"" wrote in message
> > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Yikes! You must have big plums to persist with a customer
> > like that.
> > &
""Alan poettker"" wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Hi,
> Can anyone tell me where I may find specific information reguarding
> cofiguring a 2600 series router with the GUI interface..(through my
internet
> browser). I would like to know what specific softare may be required to do
> this
""Priscilla Oppenheimer"" wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> DeVoe, Charles (PKI) wrote:
> >
> > I am looking at frame relay. As I understand it, the frame
> > relay connection
> > goes from the CPE to the service provider CO. My question is,
> > does the
> > destination device on the oth
ginal Message -----
> From: "The Long and Winding Road"
> To:
> Sent: Monday, March 10, 2003 11:15 AM
> Subject: Re: Any w2k syslog server avaiable? [7:64883]
>
>
> > ""Richard Campbell"" wrote in message
> > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
OK, enough already. I messed up the guy's name. Like it's never happened to
me
Mr. Solie, I am enjoying reading your book and I sincerely apologize for mis
spelling and therefore mis representing your name.
As I said last night, I find this one more understandable than Caslow in
many places,
""supernet"" wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> A friend of mine wants to establish a business that use internet to make
> phone calls. He wants to set up PSTN gateways in some countries and sell
> IP phones to high speed customers so customers can talk to each other
> free of charge and th
""richard dumoulin"" wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> I was wondering whether the people who passed the lab and used the well
> known prep lab workbooks did adapt their own home lab to do the exercises
or
> bought all the necessary routers/switches to set up the 13 router lab or
> just pu
The problem with this whole discussion is that it focuses around hardware
that has been defined as something by the manufacturers, and does not focus
on function.
In the end, it is software - code - that does what it does, and the hardware
it runs on is irrelevant.
The OSI model is just a way of
""nrf"" wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ""The Long and Winding Road"" wrote in
> message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > ""supernet"" wrote in message
> > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > A friend of mine
""Priscilla Oppenheimer"" wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> chris kane wrote:
> >
> > It recently came to my attention that my company may plan to
> > disable all CDP
> > in our network. The current vibe is that they see it as a
> > security risk. My
> > intent is to research this and prov
Lesson 1 - if you can't get it to work, call tech support. It will start
working the instant you are talking to a tech.
Lesson 2 - if it was working on the physical interface, and not working when
you moved everything to the dialer interface, just power cycle the hardware.
Things start working lik
""John Neiberger"" wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Can't find the link off hand, but recently I read something on the
> Cisco web
> >site about L2 vulnerabilities - mac flooding or something.
> >
> >In any case, what it comes down to is that the possibility exists
> that
> >someone of e
With the announcement of the CCIE Voice certification ( a Good Thing, IMHO )
I wonder a couple of things:
1) who will be the first quadruple CCIE?
2) Does Cisco still recognize the Design, WAN, and IBM CCIE's as valid
certifications, making it possible to have more than four?
3) When will the CC
""Abdallah Quqas"" wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Dear ALL;
> >
> > How we may prevent and block Rip Routing protocol from trigger dialing
> > through isdn BRI. And HOW we can be assured that the unknown trigger
come
> > from RIP.
access-list 101 deny udp any any eq RIP ( 520 )
ac
an interesting evening, all things considered. where's that woman from
Australia been lately?
Jen - your insight and experience would be most welcome here :->
Got an OSPF demand circuit to work as advertised:
R2#o data
OSPF Router with ID (10.7.7.7) (Process ID 2)
A byproduct of some recent study. Probably should be classed a work in
progress.
Hope it helps
http://www.chuckslongroad.info/OSPF_Frame_Reference.htm
Chuck
--
TANSTAAFL
"there ain't no such thing as a free lunch"
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=65517&t=6551
Ran into something in Parkhurst's OSPF book while studying tonight. Looking
for validation of my observation.
The example: OSPF over frame relay
The topology: hub and spoke, with a twist. The hub uses subinterfaces ( one
to each spoke router ) and the spokes use physical interfaces.
Now, the Par
I've been hunkering down with the Parkhurst OSPF book, just refreshing my
memory.
BTW, for the nitty gritty on how commands work on Cisco routers, Parkhurst
is da man.
However, I am noticing a lot of glitches for which I have neither the
patience nor the time to sort out.
For example, redistribu
form a proper adjacency with an NMBA link, neighbor staement or no. Each
side thinks the other is like itself, and they are not the same.
Examples to the contrary are welcome.
>
> Regards
>
> ""The Long and Winding Road"" wrote in
> message news:[EMAIL PROT
""Sam"" wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Hey there
>
> I had a simple question.
>
> I came across this router which had an ip address of 199.66.15.252/27
>
> I wonder how that is possible because it doesn't seem a legal address.
> With a subnet mask of 27, you get 6 subnets as follows:
>
For those struggling with OSPF authentication, I have created an OSPF
authentication reference chart on my web site:
http://www.chuckslongroad.info/OSPF_Authentication.htm
While visiting, you might also want to read through the essay I wrote on
this topic a couple of months back on Groupstudy.
h
> thanks Chuck , it has cleared my doubts on OSPF authentication.
>
> ""The Long and Winding Road"" wrote in
> message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For those struggling with OSPF authentication, I have created an OSPF
> > authentication reference chart
Not sure I have this all sorted out correctly. Perhaps those with a bit more
experience might add their wisdom, not to mention their corrections.
The ospf virtual link being what it is, it follows rules similar to any
other interface.
It does appear, though, that in terms of structure, it looks s
manner.
Someone asked me off line about how the Lab proctors might grade this kind
of task. The answer of course is "who knows?" All you're given is a
percentage of the general section. The key is understanding how to make it
work without spending too much time "trying thi
manner.
Someone asked me off line about how the Lab proctors might grade this kind
of task. The answer of course is "who knows?" All you're given is a
percentage of the general section. The key is understanding how to make it
work without spending too much time "trying thi
""KW S"" wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Can someone tell me what is the function of the protocol field in the IP
> header.
>
> I get a little confused after reading from some many sources.
here's the horse's mouth:
http://www.iana.org/assignments/protocol-numbers
( it says everythin
""Peter van Oene"" wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> At 07:31 PM 3/18/2003 +, Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote:
> >Maccubbin, Duncan wrote:
> > >
> > > How is the industry supposed to keep up with this??
> >
> >What's the issue? Not sure I'm seeing your point. What's wrong with Cisco
> >ann
""Priscilla Oppenheimer"" wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> KW S wrote:
> >
> > Can someone tell me what is the function of the protocol field
> > in the IP header.
> >
> > I get a little confused after reading from some many sources.
> >
> > Regards
> > kws
>
> The Protocol field identifi
""Skarphedinsson Arni V."" wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Hi
>
> One question
>
> If I have the need to use many VLANS, let4s say around 400, can could I
use
> a 3550 switch that supports 1005 vlans as the core, and then 2950 switches
> in the wiring closets, but they dont support more
""Jim Devane"" wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> hello all,
>
> (Re-post...not sure if original msg made it our not)
>
> playing around again and have a question. eBGP multi-hop cannot come up if
> the peer is known through a default route.
> Is there a reason why?
> I mean, what is the po
""Skarphedinsson Arni V."" wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> I was testing this in my lab, and could not get VTP to work with this
setup,
> as soon as I went over 254 vlans the Cat2950 gave me this message
>
> 00:17:11: %SW_VLAN-6-VTP_MODE_CHANGE: VLAN manager changing device mode
from
> C
""Elijah Savage"" wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cisco buys Linksys.
>
>
http://www.quicken.com/investments/news/story/?story=NewsStory/BW/20030320/a
5141_1048177983.var&p=CSCO
>
Note that Cisco will continue with the Linksys name and operate the company
as a separate division.
Cisco
Cisco has already answered this question
Your first point of reference:
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/625/ccie/ccie_program/whatsnew.html
and in particular for the 3550 switches
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/625/ccie/ccie_program/whatsnew.html#13
and
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/625
Sorry if I am misunderstanding your diagram. Where do you think the loop
should appear?
Routes originating on R8 would appear as connected, and therefore not be
overwritten by redistribution, Same on R7.
I guess I am just not seeing what the topology is or where you think the
break should be.
"
""Cisco Nuts"" wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Hello,
> Why is BGP bestpath as-path ignore a hidden cmd - if it indeed is?? Here
is
> what I got:
> AS7018-NAP(config)#router bgp 7018
> AS7018-NAP(config-router)#bgp bestpath as?
> % Unrecognized command
> AS7018-NAP(config-router)#bgp bes
""John Neiberger"" wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Hello,
> > Can any explain what these EXACTLY mean?
> >
> > ip as-path access-list 1 permit _109_
>
> Matches any prefix that passed through AS 109.
the book answer is that the underscore _ matches a lot of things including
the beginn
""Cisco Nuts"" wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Hello,
> I have 2 routers in AS300
> RTF is connected to RTA in AS 1239 &
> RTG is connected to RTH in AS 701
> In AS300 I have set communities via a route-map to be advertised as
follows:
> 1239:110 to AS 1239 &
> 701:120 to AS 701
>
> Rout
""KW S"" wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Can someone tell me what is the function of the protocol field in the IP
> header.
>
> I get a little confused after reading from some many sources.
here's the horse's mouth:
http://www.iana.org/assignments/protocol-numbers
( it says everythin
I'm working on a practice lab problem.
there are two domains - OSPF and EIGRP
The two domains can only communicate via ISDN
OSPF---R1---ISDN--R2EIGRP
R1 is where redistribution takes place. The ISDN link is in the EIGRP
domain.
Pretty much I've concluded that the only way this work
Yes I know it's not a bright idea ;->
I'm working on a practice lab which appears to me to be poorly written. Some
of the solutions are out of left field, but I suppose that's to be expected
of CCIE practice labs.
Question - redistribution of BGP into OSPF? Problematic? Impossible on a
Cisco rout
hey referring
> to that could bring up the line.
>
> Nigel
> Dazed and confused :->
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "David j"
> To:
> Sent: Sunday, March 23, 2003 2:50 AM
> Subject: RE: Sanity Check - ISDN and EIGRP [7:66016]
>
>
> > See below:
&g
>
> Cheers,
>
> Willy
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> The Long and Winding Road
> Sent: zondag 23 maart 2003 8:38
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Sanity Check - Redistributing BGP into an IG
one of my 26xx's it works just fine.
Thanks to all who responded.
Does not bode well for future CCIE Lab prep.
--
TANSTAAFL
"there ain't no such thing as a free lunch"
""Andrew Cook"" wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ""The L
""Priscilla Oppenheimer"" wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> The Long and Winding Road wrote:
> >
> > The lab in question is one of the current crop of Cisco ASET
> > labs.
> >
> > My answer:
> > access-list 120 deny ip any
Again, a CCIE practice lab -
R5 - the task calls for mutual redistribution of OSPF and RIP
The next task says that no routes are to be advertised out the RIP
interface - only in.
So tell me, why are we even bothering with the OSPF into RIP redistribution?
I'm not sure I can fall asleep tonight,
Another CCIE practice lab. You gotta see this. What's wrong with this
picture?
Router 1 ( relevant configurations )
interface BRI0
no ip address
encapsulation ppp
dialer pool-member 1
isdn switch-type basic-ni
isdn spid1 0101
isdn spid2 11120101 1112
ppp multilink
!
interface Dial
wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Hi all,
>
> i would like to know your opinion/experience about using ebgp multihop
> comparing with ebgp. AFAIK, ebgp was designed for directly connected only
> and using ebgp multhop is not recomended for ISP envy. would you please
> tell me the caveat of
""Cisco Nuts"" wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Hello,
> Is the ebgp-multihop default value = 255 ??
> From all the examples that I have seen and done, it has always been set to
a
> number ex. 2 or 200 or 255 etc. but doing an example from CCO, is just
uses
> the cmd. # neighbor a.b.c.d
""Cisco Nuts"" wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Hello,
> Everytime, I configure #nei a.b.c.d default-originate on my routers, it
> crashes the router. I have tried this on different routers and it's the
> same result every time. Is this a problem on 25xx's series? My routers
have
> 16Fla
After wrestling with Solie this afternoon, it suddenly occurred to me that
there is a typical instruction in the various practice labs that can end up
driving you nuts if you look at it from one direction, but which is really
simple if looked at from another.
The topology: several routers over fra
""Mike Mihalas"" wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> I am in the process of putting together a CCIE practice lab. I have a
bunch
> of 2500 routers with varying memory. I know the lab uses 12.1 but my
> question is what feature set do I need? Will IP do what I need or do I
need
> IP Plus, or
For the past couple of weeks I've been whacking out various CCIE practice
labs. I've also been suffering various degrees of euphoria and depression,
depending upon how badly I was suckered by the redistribution problems.
After a particularly long and frustrating day with the Cisco ASET Lab #1, it
""CiscoNewbie"" wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Hi all. my cisco router keeps reporting this error when trying to bring
up
> an adjacency accross a P2P link.
>
> OSPF: Rcv pkt from xxx.xxx.xxx.13, Serial0/0.1, area 0.0.0.1: src not on
the
> same network
my eperience is that you should
In case anyone was wondering, there is a set of solutions for the Solie CCIE
Practice labs ( just the big ones at the end of the book ) found at:
http://www.informit.com/isapi/product_id~%7B9E5835BB-4972-4956-B7F7-B4C8AE56
C918%7D/selectDescTypeId~%7B5F7BB313-BBC4-4A9E-A577-562A760FE491%7D/st~CA1F
Does this solution make sense?
AS 2010R2
eBGP eBGP
AS 2001 R5 ---iBGP--- R4
eBGP
looks like it was put back in somewhere in among several versions:
R5#she ve
1d02h: %SYS-5-CONFIG_I: Configured from console by consoler
Cisco Internetwork Operating System Software
IOS (tm) 2500 Software (C2500-IS-L), Version 12.2(8)T5, RELEASE SOFTWARE
(fc1)
R5(config-router)#neigh 1.1.1.1 rem
oh never mind.. Now I remember why I couldn't find the command earlier this
week.
--
TANSTAAFL
"there ain't no such thing as a free lunch"
""The Long and Winding Road"" wrote in
message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> looks like it was put back in some
NLI ( b..o..o..t..c..a..m..p.. lab 8 ) redistribution of OSPF and BGP
I checked CCO and the "answer" key
everything "appears" to be correct.
So why is it that half my OSPF routes do not show up in the BGP table???
*> 137.20.0.0 0.0.0.0 0 32768 ?
* i137.20.40.16/28
not to disable "sync" which suggest that
> the routes not being added to the BGP, isn't sync'd with the IGP. Does
any
> of this have route information being propagated from an IBGP neighbor.
>
> Nigel
>
>
> ----- Original Message -
> From: "The
wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> All,
>
> Please can someone clear this up for me, if you have the time.
>
> IBGP peers do not have to be physically connected to one another, as long
as
> an IGP (most preferably) is running between them.
nope. direct connect is preferred, but nope - don'
""Mike Martins"" wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Yes, EBGP multihop is between different AS's, that is a different setup,
it
> must also have a way of reaching across the hops, an IGP.
nope - works just fine for iBGP as well.
>
> On a IBGP you can have a hop across ie 5 routers in a
no no no - read CCO and what it says.
during the period Sept 1 through Nov 4 the equipment will be swapped. It
won't happen in every rack in every location on the same day.
There are some places where the 3550 is already in place. RTP, for example,
so folks have said - here on this list and else
better off buying a cheap hub.
someone better versed in the electronics than I will explain this.
Essentially, the splitter does not provide the right circuitry back to the
switch.
--
www.chuckslongroad.info
like my web site?
take the survey!
""Sim, CT (Chee Tong)"" wrote in message
[EMAIL
based on this and the off line moderators' thread, I have to ask, Howard -
who put the nickel in you? Cuz whoever it is, no more nickels for them. :->
--
TANSTAAFL
there ain't no such thing as a free lunch
the price for this list is reading Howard's jokes
""Howard C. Berkowitz"" wrote in messa
in no particular order of importance, and for no particular reason.
1) redistributing classful protocols into classless protocols and visa versa
a) getting smaller subnets to match a longer boundary
( subnets with longer prefixes )
b) dealing with larger subnets than
an addition to the mix
""The Long and Winding Road"" wrote in
message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
in no particular order of importance, and for no particular reason.
1) redistributing classful protocols into classless protocols and visa
versa
""John Brandis"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hi All,
>
> Got this problem. Have a site at the moment, site a running the 172.17.x.x
> networks. Management has just informed me that we have just acquired an
> empty building down the road, site b. The idea is tha
""Shahid Muhammad Shafi"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> the babies are in San jose as well ;-)
CL: did you hear sobbing and the sounds of heads banging against the
desktops while you were there? ;->
> Cisco Nuts wrote:Sorry Greg,
>
> On a sidenote, they ha
This one deserves a homily. I can sleep tonight after solving this one.
The age old question - how to get a /23 to propagate into classful /24
domain via redistribution.
I've been toying with this a while tonight.
The problem - an "in use" interface - token ring or ethernet - has a /23
assignme
""Larry Letterman"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Pris,
>
> In our 6509's we used to make the native vlan and the data vlan
> the same and it was something other than 1...if a blade fails and
> we put in a new one , it defaults to vlan 1 for all ports. If the
> b
this is the second consecutive morning where I have seen the entire week of
November 11 with lots of empty Lab seats.
Plus a few on Nov 19th.
The next open dates after that are in May 2003
Interesting.
Get 'em while they're hot!
--
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.ph
OR - who / what is over rated?
I revisited a couple of CCIE Lab preparation books last night. I sat down
with high hopes, after a frustrating afternoon at the rack. I was looking
for some enlightenment.
The first book I hit was one of the so called "CCIE Professional
Development" books. The chap
route. I can't
find anything off hand. It might require a more careful read than I have
time for right now.
>
> Although, at first look everything does seem to be very straight-forward,
> not until you get under the hood do you really see or observe the real
> issues involved. Thanks
""Kaminski, Shawn G"" wrote in message
news:200210210329.DAA32381@;groupstudy.com...
> Sorry for the misunderstanding, guys. I got to thinking more about this
and
> I guess I wasn't thinking of the MSFC, just the 6500 switch itself. I work
> with 6000's with MSFC's and it should have slapped me in
""MADMAN"" wrote in message
news:200210241322.NAA16403@;groupstudy.com...
> Sure you can bridge between like VLANs and route between differant
> VLANs in the same box.
CL: you can also bridge between unlike vlans and unlike subnets - don't
forget fallback bridging!
>
>
> Dave
>
> Jesse Loggin
""ccie ccielab"" wrote in message
news:200210231402.OAA29232@;groupstudy.com...
> I configure point-to-multipoint on serial int and the /32 mask show up
CL: yes - that's the way it is supposed to work. see rfc 2328 for details.
>
> R1
> int s0
> ip add 172.16.1.1 255.255.255.0
> ip ospf net poi
there. probably for all
those people out there who can't or won't do proper design
>
> Dave
>
> The Long and Winding Road wrote:
> >
> > ""MADMAN"" wrote in message
> > news:200210241322.NAA16403@;groupstudy.com...
> > > Sure y
Someone a lot smarter than I did the intelligent work - i.e. the call plan
and the server configuration. I was one of the warm bodies corralled to do
installation of the desk sets.
Some idle thoughts.
( Mr. RFC 1149 Compliant is free to laugh loudly at me and make denigrating
comments :-> )
1)
one more thing - I have proof positive that in line power "can" work just
fine over Cat 3
Chuck
""The Long and Winding Road"" wrote in
message news:200210251844.SAA20015@;groupstudy.com...
> Someone a lot smarter than I did the intelligent work - i.
think "route-maps"
the access-list part should be easy to figure out.
--
www.chuckslongroad.info
""J B"" wrote in message
news:200210251954.TAA07601@;groupstudy.com...
> Can some one help me with this one?
> or point me into the right direction!
>
>
> Rip routes:
>
> 100.0.0.0/24
> 100.1.0.
I'm doing something very similar on a customer network recently installed.
Double NAT'ing works just fine provided you have the appropriate paths to
and from the other end.
In my case I have Clinic-Umbrella_Org_Router-PIX-internet
Clinics have a hodgepodge of addresses. I NAT from the
""neil K."" wrote in message
news:200210112334.XAA14349@;groupstudy.com...
> Hi Group,
>
> Can someone please explain to me the difference between cir and mincir.Any
> help is highly appreciated.
whoa - deja vu, dude! just had a thread like this one yesterday. there
were some good explaina
here are a couple of internet sources I use:
time.nist.gov
ns.arc.nasa.gov
tick.usno.navy.mil
I haven't looked in a while, but these days you can probably do a google
search and get a zillion reliable time servers.
if your client requires the IP address, you can ping each of the names, and
get t
the 3550 documentation instructs you to use the "change vtp domain name"
technique, which works fine.
I haven't tried the other ways, because they are too radical.
--
www.chuckslongroad.info
like my web site?
take the survey!
""Paul Ruiz"" wrote in message
news:200210120215.CAA31258@;groupst
a couple of comments below. may get longish as I just put together a Q&D
lab, and the outputs may bog this down.
""bergenpeak"" wrote in message
news:200210121501.PAA05804@;groupstudy.com...
> Hi JFD,
>
> Thanks for the response, but it doesn't answer the question. Is there
> something
> about
""Daniel Cevallos"" wrote in message
news:200210121728.RAA31195@;groupstudy.com...
> I will on vacation starting October 5 and will be returning to the office
on
> October 15, 2002.
>
CL: I can hardly wait!
>
>
> Thanks,
> Danny
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7
101 - 200 of 487 matches
Mail list logo
