suggest that
the routes not being added to the BGP, isn't sync'd with the IGP. Does
any
of this have route information being propagated from an IBGP neighbor.
Nigel
- Original Message -
From: The Long and Winding Road
To:
Sent: Saturday, March 29, 2003 2:27 AM
Subject: OSPF BGP
wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
All,
Please can someone clear this up for me, if you have the time.
IBGP peers do not have to be physically connected to one another, as long
as
an IGP (most preferably) is running between them.
nope. direct connect is preferred, but nope - don't
Mike Martins wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yes, EBGP multihop is between different AS's, that is a different setup,
it
must also have a way of reaching across the hops, an IGP.
nope - works just fine for iBGP as well.
On a IBGP you can have a hop across ie 5 routers in a IBGP
NLI ( b..o..o..t..c..a..m..p.. lab 8 ) redistribution of OSPF and BGP
I checked CCO and the answer key
everything appears to be correct.
So why is it that half my OSPF routes do not show up in the BGP table???
* 137.20.0.0 0.0.0.0 0 32768 ?
* i137.20.40.16/28
CiscoNewbie wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi all. my cisco router keeps reporting this error when trying to bring
up
an adjacency accross a P2P link.
OSPF: Rcv pkt from xxx.xxx.xxx.13, Serial0/0.1, area 0.0.0.1: src not on
the
same network
my eperience is that you should take
In case anyone was wondering, there is a set of solutions for the Solie CCIE
Practice labs ( just the big ones at the end of the book ) found at:
http://www.informit.com/isapi/product_id~%7B9E5835BB-4972-4956-B7F7-B4C8AE56
Does this solution make sense?
AS 2010R2
eBGP eBGP
AS 2001 R5 ---iBGP--- R4
eBGP
looks like it was put back in somewhere in among several versions:
R5#she ve
1d02h: %SYS-5-CONFIG_I: Configured from console by consoler
Cisco Internetwork Operating System Software
IOS (tm) 2500 Software (C2500-IS-L), Version 12.2(8)T5, RELEASE SOFTWARE
(fc1)
R5(config-router)#neigh 1.1.1.1
oh never mind.. Now I remember why I couldn't find the command earlier this
week.
--
TANSTAAFL
there ain't no such thing as a free lunch
The Long and Winding Road wrote in
message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
looks like it was put back in somewhere in among several versions:
R5#she ve
Cisco Nuts wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello,
Everytime, I configure #nei a.b.c.d default-originate on my routers, it
crashes the router. I have tried this on different routers and it's the
same result every time. Is this a problem on 25xx's series? My routers
have
16Flash and
After wrestling with Solie this afternoon, it suddenly occurred to me that
there is a typical instruction in the various practice labs that can end up
driving you nuts if you look at it from one direction, but which is really
simple if looked at from another.
The topology: several routers over
Mike Mihalas wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am in the process of putting together a CCIE practice lab. I have a
bunch
of 2500 routers with varying memory. I know the lab uses 12.1 but my
question is what feature set do I need? Will IP do what I need or do I
need
IP Plus, or even
For the past couple of weeks I've been whacking out various CCIE practice
labs. I've also been suffering various degrees of euphoria and depression,
depending upon how badly I was suckered by the redistribution problems.
After a particularly long and frustrating day with the Cisco ASET Lab #1, it
wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi all,
i would like to know your opinion/experience about using ebgp multihop
comparing with ebgp. AFAIK, ebgp was designed for directly connected only
and using ebgp multhop is not recomended for ISP envy. would you please
tell me the caveat of using
Cisco Nuts wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello,
Is the ebgp-multihop default value = 255 ??
From all the examples that I have seen and done, it has always been set to
a
number ex. 2 or 200 or 255 etc. but doing an example from CCO, is just
uses
the cmd. # neighbor a.b.c.d
Again, a CCIE practice lab -
R5 - the task calls for mutual redistribution of OSPF and RIP
The next task says that no routes are to be advertised out the RIP
interface - only in.
So tell me, why are we even bothering with the OSPF into RIP redistribution?
I'm not sure I can fall asleep
Another CCIE practice lab. You gotta see this. What's wrong with this
picture?
Router 1 ( relevant configurations )
interface BRI0
no ip address
encapsulation ppp
dialer pool-member 1
isdn switch-type basic-ni
isdn spid1 0101
isdn spid2 11120101 1112
ppp multilink
!
interface
Yes I know it's not a bright idea ;-
I'm working on a practice lab which appears to me to be poorly written. Some
of the solutions are out of left field, but I suppose that's to be expected
of CCIE practice labs.
Question - redistribution of BGP into OSPF? Problematic? Impossible on a
Cisco
-
From: David j
To:
Sent: Sunday, March 23, 2003 2:50 AM
Subject: RE: Sanity Check - ISDN and EIGRP [7:66016]
See below:
The Long and Winding Road wrote:
I'm working on a practice lab problem.
there are two domains - OSPF and EIGRP
The two domains can only communicate
redistribute-internal
no bgp redistribute-internal
But this also needed for EIGRP, so it might not apply to your scenario
as you say that it works with EIGRP.
Cheers,
Willy
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
The Long and Winding Road
to all who responded.
Does not bode well for future CCIE Lab prep.
--
TANSTAAFL
there ain't no such thing as a free lunch
Andrew Cook wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The Long and Winding Road wrote in
message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am unable to successfully redistribute BGP
Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The Long and Winding Road wrote:
The lab in question is one of the current crop of Cisco ASET
labs.
My answer:
access-list 120 deny ip any host 255.255.255.255
access-list 120 permit ip any host 224.0.0.9
access-list
Cisco Nuts wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello,
Why is BGP bestpath as-path ignore a hidden cmd - if it indeed is?? Here
is
what I got:
AS7018-NAP(config)#router bgp 7018
AS7018-NAP(config-router)#bgp bestpath as?
% Unrecognized command
AS7018-NAP(config-router)#bgp bestpath
John Neiberger wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello,
Can any explain what these EXACTLY mean?
ip as-path access-list 1 permit _109_
Matches any prefix that passed through AS 109.
the book answer is that the underscore _ matches a lot of things including
the beginning and the
Cisco Nuts wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello,
I have 2 routers in AS300
RTF is connected to RTA in AS 1239
RTG is connected to RTH in AS 701
In AS300 I have set communities via a route-map to be advertised as
follows:
1239:110 to AS 1239
701:120 to AS 701
Routers in AS 1239
KW S wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can someone tell me what is the function of the protocol field in the IP
header.
I get a little confused after reading from some many sources.
here's the horse's mouth:
http://www.iana.org/assignments/protocol-numbers
( it says everything that
I'm working on a practice lab problem.
there are two domains - OSPF and EIGRP
The two domains can only communicate via ISDN
OSPF---R1---ISDN--R2EIGRP
R1 is where redistribution takes place. The ISDN link is in the EIGRP
domain.
Pretty much I've concluded that the only way this
Cisco has already answered this question
Your first point of reference:
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/625/ccie/ccie_program/whatsnew.html
and in particular for the 3550 switches
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/625/ccie/ccie_program/whatsnew.html#13
and
Sorry if I am misunderstanding your diagram. Where do you think the loop
should appear?
Routes originating on R8 would appear as connected, and therefore not be
overwritten by redistribution, Same on R7.
I guess I am just not seeing what the topology is or where you think the
break should be.
Skarphedinsson Arni V. wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi
One question
If I have the need to use many VLANS, let4s say around 400, can could I
use
a 3550 switch that supports 1005 vlans as the core, and then 2950 switches
in the wiring closets, but they dont support more than 250
Jim Devane wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
hello all,
(Re-post...not sure if original msg made it our not)
playing around again and have a question. eBGP multi-hop cannot come up if
the peer is known through a default route.
Is there a reason why?
I mean, what is the point of a
Skarphedinsson Arni V. wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I was testing this in my lab, and could not get VTP to work with this
setup,
as soon as I went over 254 vlans the Cat2950 gave me this message
00:17:11: %SW_VLAN-6-VTP_MODE_CHANGE: VLAN manager changing device mode
from
CLIENT to
Elijah Savage wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cisco buys Linksys.
http://www.quicken.com/investments/news/story/?story=NewsStory/BW/20030320/a
5141_1048177983.varp=CSCO
Note that Cisco will continue with the Linksys name and operate the company
as a separate division.
Cisco failed
KW S wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can someone tell me what is the function of the protocol field in the IP
header.
I get a little confused after reading from some many sources.
here's the horse's mouth:
http://www.iana.org/assignments/protocol-numbers
( it says everything that
Peter van Oene wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
At 07:31 PM 3/18/2003 +, Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote:
Maccubbin, Duncan wrote:
How is the industry supposed to keep up with this??
What's the issue? Not sure I'm seeing your point. What's wrong with Cisco
announcing that their
Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
KW S wrote:
Can someone tell me what is the function of the protocol field
in the IP header.
I get a little confused after reading from some many sources.
Regards
kws
The Protocol field identifies the next layer, in
:-)
- Original Message -
From: The Long and Winding Road
To:
Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2003 12:04 AM
Subject: OSPF Virtual link authentication - observations [7:65628]
Not sure I have this all sorted out correctly. Perhaps those with a bit
more
experience might add their wisdom
:-)
- Original Message -
From: The Long and Winding Road
To:
Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2003 12:04 AM
Subject: OSPF Virtual link authentication - observations [7:65628]
Not sure I have this all sorted out correctly. Perhaps those with a bit
more
experience might add their wisdom
staement or no. Each
side thinks the other is like itself, and they are not the same.
Examples to the contrary are welcome.
Regards
The Long and Winding Road wrote in
message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ran into something in Parkhurst's OSPF book while studying tonight.
Looking
Sam wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hey there
I had a simple question.
I came across this router which had an ip address of 199.66.15.252/27
I wonder how that is possible because it doesn't seem a legal address.
With a subnet mask of 27, you get 6 subnets as follows:
32-64
64-96
For those struggling with OSPF authentication, I have created an OSPF
authentication reference chart on my web site:
http://www.chuckslongroad.info/OSPF_Authentication.htm
While visiting, you might also want to read through the essay I wrote on
this topic a couple of months back on Groupstudy.
on OSPF authentication.
The Long and Winding Road wrote in
message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For those struggling with OSPF authentication, I have created an OSPF
authentication reference chart on my web site:
http://www.chuckslongroad.info/OSPF_Authentication.htm
While visiting, you
Not sure I have this all sorted out correctly. Perhaps those with a bit more
experience might add their wisdom, not to mention their corrections.
The ospf virtual link being what it is, it follows rules similar to any
other interface.
It does appear, though, that in terms of structure, it looks
Ran into something in Parkhurst's OSPF book while studying tonight. Looking
for validation of my observation.
The example: OSPF over frame relay
The topology: hub and spoke, with a twist. The hub uses subinterfaces ( one
to each spoke router ) and the spokes use physical interfaces.
Now, the
I've been hunkering down with the Parkhurst OSPF book, just refreshing my
memory.
BTW, for the nitty gritty on how commands work on Cisco routers, Parkhurst
is da man.
However, I am noticing a lot of glitches for which I have neither the
patience nor the time to sort out.
For example,
With the announcement of the CCIE Voice certification ( a Good Thing, IMHO )
I wonder a couple of things:
1) who will be the first quadruple CCIE?
2) Does Cisco still recognize the Design, WAN, and IBM CCIE's as valid
certifications, making it possible to have more than four?
3) When will the
Abdallah Quqas wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dear ALL;
How we may prevent and block Rip Routing protocol from trigger dialing
through isdn BRI. And HOW we can be assured that the unknown trigger
come
from RIP.
access-list 101 deny udp any any eq RIP ( 520 )
access-list 101
an interesting evening, all things considered. where's that woman from
Australia been lately?
Jen - your insight and experience would be most welcome here :-
Got an OSPF demand circuit to work as advertised:
R2#o data
OSPF Router with ID (10.7.7.7) (Process ID 2)
A byproduct of some recent study. Probably should be classed a work in
progress.
Hope it helps
http://www.chuckslongroad.info/OSPF_Frame_Reference.htm
Chuck
--
TANSTAAFL
there ain't no such thing as a free lunch
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=65517t=65517
Lesson 1 - if you can't get it to work, call tech support. It will start
working the instant you are talking to a tech.
Lesson 2 - if it was working on the physical interface, and not working when
you moved everything to the dialer interface, just power cycle the hardware.
Things start working
John Neiberger wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't find the link off hand, but recently I read something on the
Cisco web
site about L2 vulnerabilities - mac flooding or something.
In any case, what it comes down to is that the possibility exists
that
someone of evil intent
Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
chris kane wrote:
It recently came to my attention that my company may plan to
disable all CDP
in our network. The current vibe is that they see it as a
security risk. My
intent is to research this and provide a paper
richard dumoulin wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I was wondering whether the people who passed the lab and used the well
known prep lab workbooks did adapt their own home lab to do the exercises
or
bought all the necessary routers/switches to set up the 13 router lab or
just purchased
The problem with this whole discussion is that it focuses around hardware
that has been defined as something by the manufacturers, and does not focus
on function.
In the end, it is software - code - that does what it does, and the hardware
it runs on is irrelevant.
The OSI model is just a way
nrf wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The Long and Winding Road wrote in
message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
supernet wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
A friend of mine wants to establish a business that use internet to
make
phone calls. He wants to set up PSTN gateways
and Winding Road
To:
Sent: Monday, March 10, 2003 11:15 AM
Subject: Re: Any w2k syslog server avaiable? [7:64883]
Richard Campbell wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi.. I used to use unix syslog server to log the cisco device event.
But
there is no unix box in my new company
OK, enough already. I messed up the guy's name. Like it's never happened to
me
Mr. Solie, I am enjoying reading your book and I sincerely apologize for mis
spelling and therefore mis representing your name.
As I said last night, I find this one more understandable than Caslow in
many places,
supernet wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
A friend of mine wants to establish a business that use internet to make
phone calls. He wants to set up PSTN gateways in some countries and sell
IP phones to high speed customers so customers can talk to each other
free of charge and they can
Ran into this one again on a router I recently purchased. In searching the
archives for the methodology, I realized I had not documented the procedure
anyplace last time I ran into this last September of so.
The bug: with versions of IOS 12.0, upgrade is impossible. Copy TFTP flash
fails
The
...
goodnight, all.
--
TANSTAAFL
there ain't no such thing as a free lunch
The Long and Winding Road wrote in
message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
been fooling around with the B-Link 2 that a particular someone ( whose
name
is not supposed to be mentioned here on this list ) sells at what seems
I've waffled on this one before. But lately I've been spending more time
with Soltie ( CCIE Practical Studies, Volume 1 )
Previously, I've said the jury is still out on this one.
Now that I've given Mr. Soltie his due, I am finding this is a very good
book, and well worth considering when
Richard Campbell wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi.. I used to use unix syslog server to log the cisco device event. But
there is no unix box in my new company. Only w2k. May I know is there
any
syslog software avaiable that I can install in W2k?
check out Beverly Hills Software -
seeing as the CCSI number uses only 2 digits for the date field, did the
program implode as Y2K came and went? ;-
--
TANSTAAFL
there ain't no such thing as a free lunch
Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cisco Nuts wrote:
Howard,
Why in the world would
-
From: The Long and Winding Road
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 08 March 2003 19:44
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Network Design - What Priscilla did NOT cover in her
book: WAS
[7:64842]
Symon Thurlow wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hey Chuck,
How did
Alan poettker wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
Can anyone tell me where I may find specific information reguarding
cofiguring a 2600 series router with the GUI interface..(through my
internet
browser). I would like to know what specific softare may be required to do
this or what
Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
DeVoe, Charles (PKI) wrote:
I am looking at frame relay. As I understand it, the frame
relay connection
goes from the CPE to the service provider CO. My question is,
does the
destination device on the other side of the
I presume that's 12.2.21a plus image?
from software adviser- all images that support NAT. the numbers below each
image name is the dram and flash required. these are minimums. I concur with
the other writer - more DRAM
IP PLUS 40 c1600-sy40-mz.12.0-21a
10
4
IP PLUS 56 c1600-sy56-mz.12.0-21a
into the running config when you do what I have described below.
It takes a router reload before the negation command will function
correctly.
Just an observation.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/customer/tech/tk648/tk365/technologies_tech_note0
9186a0080094374.shtml#ipnetwork
The Long and Winding Road
hey, BT, can you contact me off line please. I have a question regarding the
firmware versions.
thanks.
chuck
--
TANSTAAFL
there ain't no such thing as a free lunch
Biff Terrific wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I used to have those problems only with basic-ni; I upgraded the
Symon Thurlow wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hey Chuck,
How did that big design go, the one you mentioned on the list a few
months ago?
Symon
You mean the Never Ending Design? The Nightmare before the CCIE Lab?
Here is a brief rundown. I will say in advance that as all of you who
Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wow. Good thing Paul didn't really bring down Group Study and make it so
we
couldn't have this important discussion! :-) He said it would be down for
maintenance, but I didn't notice any downtime, (not that I spent the whole
night
Nate wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Guys,
I'm thinking of recommending IP Telephony for our company. I have
limited knowledge on the subject and I was wondering if any of you are
experts (or fraction thereof) that could help me make out a project plan
for
this. Any comments
Johan Bornman wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is EIGRP a Hybrid or Distance Vector protocol?
Yes.
Cisco docs call it a hybrid protocol because it combines some link state
features, yet also has hop count ( distance ) limitations.
Message Posted at:
MADMAN wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
speaking of NDA...
if this is a question directly off the CCIE written it deserves to be
revealed and publicly ridiculed :-
Dave
Reza wrote:
Hybrid.
Johan Bornman wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is EIGRP a Hybrid or
Peter van Oene wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
At 12:11 PM 3/7/2003 +, Johan Bornman wrote:
Is EIGRP a Hybrid or Distance Vector protocol?
Cisco calls it Hybrid. It looks pretty distance vector to me though.
in what way? the hop count is pretty well hidden in the dark interior
John Hutchison wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
My netacad states:
Technically, EIGRP is an advanced distance-vector routing protocol that
relies on features commonly associated with link-state protocols
in none of the Cisco exams I have ever taken has there ever been the more
of AppleTalk traffic
Lots of Novell traffic
Lots of NetBIOS traffic
Lots of IP traffic
Ancient PCs with slow CPUs
There are no performance issues.
Priscilla
The Long and Winding Road wrote:
ferry ferry wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I need a scheme of network.It
MADMAN wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I agree 100%, it is ENHANCED, read glorified, IGRP.
the REAL question is which is better, EIGRP or L3 switching? ;-
Dave
John Neiberger wrote:
This really isn't the case. EIGRP is purely distance vector. In no way
does it behave
you know the one. you're working with subnets of a classful network. let's
say 10.0.0.0. you enter the command ip default-network 10.1.1.0 and what
shows up in the running config is ip route 10.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 10.1.1.0.
Then try as you might, the command no ip route 10.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 10.1.1.0
been fooling around with the B-Link 2 that a particular someone ( whose name
is not supposed to be mentioned here on this list ) sells at what seems to
be a reasonable price.
not looking for specific answers - just a general question - ever get both B
channels to come up? just a yes or no.
(
This is a notice of equipment available on that well known auction site.
Ignore if you are not interested in acquiring routers for your study.
package of three 2502 token rings routers, with 16/16, IOS 12.1.5, 2 each of
serial cables, TR media filters, and TR MAU's
great way to start out your
Mossburg, Geoff (MAN-Corporate) wrote in
message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm full of questions tonight...
My company's Catalyst 6509's MSFC has VLANs configured with IP addresses
in
the x.x.x.1 format, but I've noticed that I can telnet to the MSFC by
substituting x.x.x.0 or x.x.x.255 for any
Ron wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have need to put public access machines on the same pipe as my private
network. I also have need for each of the public machines not to talk to
each other. Is there a way to keep all ports connected to public machines
from talking to each other
fred barreras wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
CiscoPress book for CCNP routing is very specific on changing hello
setting
and having dead/interval setting changing automatically.
just like the documentation.
a couple of IOS releases ago, the trick question used to be, how do you
Skarphedinsson Arni V. wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I would say it sound very intresting, sepcialy for those that have call
manager / voice experince.
I wonder how much routing it has, for example, I doubt you have to
configure
BGP on this one, or what do you think ?
OTOH, bet
Angel Leiva wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Here are my two favorite WEB based Cisco router memory dealers:
http://www.memoryx.net/routers.html
http://www.kg2.com/memory-2500-series.html
I've had good results from both of these places, and they are good choices.
Another that you
garrett allen wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
i have a need for a high availability solution for a default gateway
configuration. just finished the ccdp and thought it might be
interesting to try hsrp on a pair of 2514's. put some of that theory
to work. instead of highly resiliant
DAve Diaz wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
how are you supposed to prepare for this buty all that equipment no thanks
there would be a distinct advantage to substantial hands on experience.
maybe this marks the start of the trend away from the paper ( some use the
term lab rat ) CCIE's
Steven Aiello wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello all,
in a recent post I saw the term collapsed backbone. I know that
the network backbone is usually a high speed connection that a server
farm sits on, and could even extend out to your IFD's. However I'm
fuzzy on the term
Engineer
Cisco Systems
- Original Message -
From: The Long and Winding Road
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 11:04 PM
Subject: Off Topic - just screwing around and what do I see? [7:64449]
three routers in a circle. but that's irrelevant.
inbound
Steve Wilson wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On the 3550 devices that I have the label on the back indicates whether it
is EMI or SMI, beyond that if you can type in the command IP ROUTING it
would seem logical that it is an EMI rather than an SMI.
I believe the SMI does RIP routing,
oscar wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can I see the configuration of a Cisco router without a password recovery?
The problem is that the configuration was removed from the startup-config
by
mistake and nobody remember the password and a password recovery here
means
loose the
together in the
same as number..not sure about different as #'s
Larry Letterman
Network Engineer
Cisco Systems
- Original Message -
From: The Long and Winding Road
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 11:04 PM
Subject
jeffrey schwartz wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I thought I posted this before but I guess not. I am preparing for CCIE
written then the lab and was wondering if anyone has used these guys
http://www.amilabs.com before I invest any money? The price seems decent
for
a starter before I
Xy Hien Le wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
I have experienced the Cisco 25xx routers crashed many time when
configuring
BGP with the 26xx and 36xx routers, connected in a lab environment; most
of
time happened when I do the clear ip bgp * command.
Does anyone have the same
Wes Stevens wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Any advice on a cheap and good domain name register? I am
tired of paying out the nose for register.com.
I find it hard to believe you are not receiving at least three spam messages
a day from alternative registrars.
I'm sending you some
Bruno Fernandes wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Should I expect IS-IS in the security LAB ?
One can learn everything one needs to know about life, the universe, and
Cisco CCIE Lab preparation through the proper study of baseball.
So - if you were a major league hitter stepping into the
]
Scott Roberts wrote:
shoulds like you're trying to answer a trick question on a
test? I suppose
The Long and Winding Road wanted you to work for your answer,
but I'll
come out and tell you.
Why did you come out and tell the original poster the answer? Wouldn't
the
poster
ferry ferry wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I need a scheme of network.It need seven hundreds points.please give me
some
advice on how to design it.It include that how to select network
product,product configuration.They are seted in a building.It have twenty
layers.
Let's see if I
zino wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
I want know different Among the crypto access-list of gre and ip command
it's morte like IPSec over a GRE tunnel, and watch the MTU if you do this.
Hard and long experience :-
ex)access-list 100 per gre 10.0.0.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.0.0 0.0.0.255
1 - 100 of 482 matches
Mail list logo
