[google-appengine] Re: Hi, GAE team, I beg you, please don't spawn any dynamic instances for my project, is it possible?

>>> {{app_version}} >>> >>> >>> true >>> >>> >>> true >>> >>> >>> true >>> >>> >>> true >>> >>> >>

[google-appengine] Re: 100 Email Quota

I have an application that sends out an email when a user submits to a > form. > The free quota limit is 100 emails per day. > > I reached the limit and want to increase it. So I signed up for paid > service. > > Now I read elsewhere that the email quota limit will not be i

[google-appengine] Re: Application down for almost 2 hours now. Error code 104, and tons of memcache errors

-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email t

[google-appengine] Application down for almost 2 hours now. Error code 104, and tons of memcache errors

eatly appreciated, because our customers are (rightfully) very unhappy. (We'd be on a paid support plan if it was available in our country, but it was not last time we checked) Kind regards Per -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App

[google-appengine] Application outage for 25 minutes now, Error code 121

n the admin console looks just normal. Pingdom verifies that the site is essentially down. We'd be on a paid support plan, if it existed for our country (Germany). But since we cannot get official support, I'm posting to the forums in the hope of someone being able to help? Kind

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Announcing a credit for App Engine applications with new custom domains

This is great news! It will be even greater if this also removes any subdomain limits along the way. Our customers love to get a subdomain when they purchase our product, but from what I can tell the limit right now is 20 subdomains per SNI, and you can only have 20 SNIs. Which means, if we

[google-appengine] Re: security issue (strange behavior)

crawling your site. I wouldn't say that 100 comments per day is a lot. :) On Saturday, April 13, 2013 4:37:01 AM UTC+2, @Mlaynes wrote: > > > forgot to say .. now, in my graphs you can see few empty recordings, but > that's because many of them I've deleted .. and during

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Every day around 9.10 AM Brussels time, huge drop in GAE performances

l make it more probable that someone at Google picks this up. (I'd also add "increase to F4 unless you already have, since it's better to pay a bit extra than to be down, and see if that hels") Cheers, Per On Monday, February 11, 2013 10:28:34 PM UTC+1, gafal wrote: > > I

[google-appengine] Re: Every day around 9.10 AM Brussels time, huge drop in GAE performances

While I haven't seen that problem, I'd love to learn more about it. Do you have more information other than "it being slow"? Did you try running appstats? Is it db-related, memcache, CPU slowness, or maybe even session-related? Google may find out by looking at your app, but us others cannot,

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Console issues?

We're also still experiencing problems. Latency has increased by about 30% : from 850ms "pre incident" per Pingdom to roughly 1100ms currently. We're getting some errors in the logs (not as many as during the incident fortunately, and not as many as Mark), but we're

[google-appengine] Re: Error deploying

Yes, you're not alone :) I'm trying to mitigate the Taskqueue-Problem with a quick code-change... but I run into the same error as you are. Cheers, Per On Tuesday, December 18, 2012 7:42:37 PM UTC+1, Thiago Catoto wrote: > > Hi, > > Is someone having issues deployin

[google-appengine] Re: instance scheduling mystery

Hi Peter, I currently have the "pending latency" slider set to 14.9 secs min and 15.0 > secs max. I have also set it to "auto"/"auto" per tips in other threads but > can't tell a difference. > That's most likely your problem. Check out

Re: [google-appengine] Server Error. Application Down. Java. HRD.

n about GAE at the Berlin Java User Group next week. While I will praise all the cool features of App Engine, I have the feeling that I won't convert a single attendee once I mention the errors we keep running into. Which is sad, because I do want GAE to prosper. Cheers, Per On Thursday, D

[google-appengine] Re: GAE keeps starting new instances causing lots of user facing loading requests

e also something has actually been reconfigured and we're just the first who moved to new smarter settings, and you'll follow soon. Do you guys happen to use https by the way, and do you track latency externally like with Pingdom or so? Cheers, Per On Wednesday, November 28, 2012 1:3

[google-appengine] Re: Latency doubled since Nov 19 -- our Pingdom stats look pretty awful

Okay, I'll continue my conversation with myself here. Someone fixed it! It's not unicorn land yet, but *substantially* faster. Hovering around 800ms according to Pingdom now. Which I guess is fine: Pingdom requests include session creation cost each time, so regular requests would be faster.

[google-appengine] Re: Latency doubled since Nov 19 -- our Pingdom stats look pretty awful

suggestions would of course be greatly appreciated! Cheers, Per -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/FsdUfR9ywaEJ. To post to t

[google-appengine] Latency doubled since Nov 19 -- our Pingdom stats look pretty awful

00 to 2500ms as well * Our average per Pingdom was 700ms until November 19, and now it's 1400ms. <https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-z3biVzfKyqk/ULAWzA-2jAI/AFM/RZC5_qkkg-E/s1600/Response+Time+Report+noop.png> It's as if one extra roundtrip was added somewhere. Maybe the

[google-appengine] Re: Random "Server Errors" which don't show up in logs, only on the dashboard statistics (and when you run into them)

g/s1600/Dashboard+-+Small+Improvements-2.png> Who knows, maybe the entire outage could have been avoided by analysing our bug report in time :) Well, at least the error I described above is now gone, without any action on our end. Cheers, Per On Wednesday, November 21, 2012 3:16:24 AM UT

[google-appengine] Re: Looks like appengine is down

;s service. Please try again later. The team at Google." Cheers, Per On Friday, November 23, 2012 2:24:19 AM UTC+1, Brandon Wirtz wrote: > > http://appengine.google.com/ 500s and All of our sites are down. > > > > So is > https://developers.goo

[google-appengine] Re: This is my app!

We're neighbours! On Thursday, October 18, 2012 10:34:02 AM UTC+2, pdknsk wrote: > > You cannot easily tell, but I have it on good authority that an > instance of one of my apps is currently hosted in the first (from the > top) green wired board, second rack from the right. > > http://www.goo

Re: [google-appengine] Hundreds of 500-pages out of the blue. All related to database errors ("An error occurred parsing (locally or remotely) the arguments to DATASTORE_V3.Get()")

ervice and database cannot be outsourced, and having to write post mortems (or reimbursing clients that are affected) more than once every few months is not an option. Cheers, Per -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" gro

Re: [google-appengine] Hundreds of 500-pages out of the blue. All related to database errors ("An error occurred parsing (locally or remotely) the arguments to DATASTORE_V3.Get()")

nd thanks for passing this on the engineering team :) Cheers, Per On Thursday, October 4, 2012 1:03:20 PM UTC+2, Takashi Matsuo (Google) wrote: > > > Hi Per, > > I have informed this issue to the engineering team. Thanks for the report. > Anyway, it seems that now the error stopped. Ca

Re: [google-appengine] Hundreds of 500-pages out of the blue. All related to database errors ("An error occurred parsing (locally or remotely) the arguments to DATASTORE_V3.Get()")

do have my application ID and my name, so it shouldn't be hard to retrieve it that way either. Cheers, Per On Thursday, October 4, 2012 9:22:39 AM UTC+2, Takashi Matsuo (Google) wrote: > > Hi Per, > > Sorry, but I'm not able to locate the log you pasted. Can you confir

[google-appengine] Hundreds of 500-pages out of the blue. All related to database errors ("An error occurred parsing (locally or remotely) the arguments to DATASTORE_V3.Get()")

oblems. Then it was fine for 2 months, and just when I go on vacation, it breaks down again. Anything I can do on my end? Cheers, Per -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To view this discussion on the web visit

[google-appengine] Average response time went from 400ms to 800ms about 36 hours ago, and is still up there

d me anyway, since it seems to be database related. I'd investigate further, but I'm on vacation. I hope this can be "solved" by moving us to a different cluster for now? Kind regards, Per -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &quo

[google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine SDK 1.7.2 is out

better at night knowing that quality is high on your agenda. Releases like this give me the confidence I need to be recommending GAE to others again. So kudos to you all for such a boring yet bold release! :) Cheers, Per On Thursday, September 20, 2012 12:26:40 PM UTC+2, Takashi Matsuo (Goog

Re: [google-appengine] Re: APP DOWN: App suddenly no longer starts, no code changes

t stops me from recommending App Engine wholeheartedly. I bet I'm not the only one. :) When discussing your strategies, it would be great if you could consider "improved responsiveness" too. Cheers, Per On Thursday, September 13, 2012 8:12:35 PM UTC+2, psm wrote: > > Jeff,

[google-appengine] Re: Catching bounced emails

x27;s really simple to integrate, and while it costs a little extra, you'll get really good service right now, and some features (like not resending to already bounced addresses) that you might never get on GAE. Cheers, Per On Tuesday, August 14, 2012 9:31:19 PM UTC+2, Blaine Garrett wrot

[google-appengine] Our application is suffering from 4 different kinds of 500 errors, plus memory spikes. Are we the 1.7.1 guinea pig?

e us back to a regular 1.7.0 environment. Cheers, Per PS: I've raised production issues, but since I have never heard back from a single one *ever*, I'm posting to this forum to state how unhappy I am. It seems to be the only way to get attention (yeah, I've tried gett

[google-appengine] Re: Frameworks on GAE

l, you'll hopefully make enough money in B2B-land, so you can afford paying someone to drop a framework that helped you kickstart your project faster. That's my strategy at least :) Cheers Per On Sunday, July 22, 2012 11:32:41 AM UTC+2, glimmung wrote: > > Hi All, > > I&#

[google-appengine] Re: Task Guarantee?

w we do it :) Whenever something is important, we want to track some kind of status anyhow. One of these statuses would be STATUS_UNPROCESSED or so. Cheers, Per On Wednesday, July 11, 2012 1:55:37 PM UTC+2, Richard Arrano wrote: > > Hello, > I have been designing my app with the

[google-appengine] Memcache errors break the GAE-internal session handling. Our application is almost unusable now. Help, please?

't simply add insult to injury. Application ID is small-improvements. Kind regards, Per -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengin

[google-appengine] Re: Memcache errors break session-saving. Should fail silently IMO. Any workaround?

a!",thrown); super.handleServiceError(thrown); } }); Any idea how else to register a handler to prevent this from killing our requests? Cheers, Per On Friday, July 6, 2012 7:24:26 PM UTC+2, Joakim wrote: > > If silent failure on write is to be acceptable, we

Re: [google-appengine] Need help or consulting: Request was aborted errors

t takes ~55 msec of CPU + API > > That's 825 msec for THE WHOLE LOT ! So why on earth is there 8 second > of waiting before that request was serviced ? > > > -R > > On Sunday, July 8, 2012 10:13:28 PM UTC-4, Per wrote: >> >> >> Not sure where I

Re: [google-appengine] Need help or consulting: Request was aborted errors

Not sure where I saw it, but I believe an application must respond within a second at most *on average*, or GAE reserves the right to throttle it. So, if you have some kind of slowdown inside your app, then requests start piling up. I'm not a Python developer, but if you had the equivalent of a

[google-appengine] Re: Need help or consulting: Request was aborted errors

;d suggest resetting to automatic/automatic values, it just seemed more reliable to me. You didn't mention if you had checked the quota details screen, there are a couple of per-minute quotas that seem to bite people out of the blue. I once had a backup-job that was stuck and cost me l

[google-appengine] Re: managing bulk emails from app engine app

ou have sent already, so you know what you'd need to resend if push comes to shove. Cheers, Per On Saturday, July 7, 2012 7:19:12 PM UTC+2, Vivek Kumar wrote: > > Hello > > We have around 1 registered users with us who are blood donors. We > want to send them periodic e

[google-appengine] Memcache errors break session-saving. Should fail silently IMO. Any workaround?

MemcacheService service = MemcacheServiceFactory.getMemcacheService(); service.setErrorHandler(new LogAndContinueErrorHandler(Level.SEVERE)); Any help would be appreciated! Kind regards, Per -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" g

[google-appengine] Re: Is strong symmetric encryption possible on GAE at all (using Java)? I've searched for hours now...

es me very happy! Also, encryption is surprisingly fast, a lot faster than on my local MBP. There's really no excuse to not encrypt your data anymore. Thanks for solving the underlying issue, despite there being relatively few votes. Per -- You received this message because you are sub

[google-appengine] Cannot purchase VIP SSL: "Limit reached, contact SSL trusted testers support"

eam is. When I last inquired (by email) to the address which signed me up to the TT, I didn't hear back. Well, I *never* hear back from Google when sending emails to you. So I'm putting this into the forum right away :) Any idea? Cheers, Per -- You received this message because you a

[google-appengine] Re: App Engine 1.7.0 Release is Out!

. With all these improvements in place, you might even be able to spare a developer to rework the FAQs :) Cheers, Per On Wednesday, June 27, 2012 1:42:16 AM UTC+2, Takashi Matsuo (Google) wrote: > > > Hi App Engine users, > > We've just released the release of the 1.7.0 S

[google-appengine] Re: Is strong symmetric encryption possible on GAE at all (using Java)? I've searched for hours now...

Oh wait! Maybe SDK 1.7 has the answer! Too late to try it now (2am) but I'll check tomorrow and update this question with my findings! That would be awesome news. Totally missed that announcement detail. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Googl

[google-appengine] Is strong symmetric encryption possible on GAE at all (using Java)? I've searched for hours now...

Or is there some other way to get strong symmetric encryption off the ground? Any help would be greatly appreciated! Per -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.go

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Java instance startup time out of control

ds to load 2000 class files one by one, or if they are all inside a handful of jars. I'd also consider moving all other files, like property-files and HTML files (in case your app parses them) into those jars. Made a huge difference for me. Good luck! Per On Saturday, June 23, 2

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Java instance startup time out of control

t had to do with file access ultimately, and that each file access on the VM needs to be verified by the secure Classloader, and that this is simply tons more efficient if you're just looking at the same jar file all the time. So, add that target to your ant file, and let us know how you go

[google-appengine] Re: 1.7.0 Prerelease Now Available

Hi Marzia, > - The Java Datastore API now supports Or queries. > > This sounds interesting. Do you have some preliminary documentation for this feature? Kind regards, Per -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine"

[google-appengine] Re: Java instance startup time out of control

, 2 days ago. Maybe your slowdown is related to a similar service change. But it sounds like your application startup is too slow to begin with. Do you have logging in there which can pinpoint what parts take how much time? Would be interested to learn about that. Cheers, Per On Saturday, Ju

[google-appengine] Re: Memcache problem on a production application

pplication we had also forgotten to try-catch memcache errors. Just keep improving until it's 100% robust. Because memcache just isn't. A large scale downtime would probably show up on the system status page, but local issues won't. Cheers, Per On Wednesday, May 16, 2012

Re: [google-appengine] Scheduler/billing changes in 1.6.5? My daily cost went from $5 to $35.

along the lines. There's plenty of whitespace on that screen. Anyway, thanks Takashi for pointing me in the right direction! Per On Tuesday, May 15, 2012 5:33:47 PM UTC+2, Takashi Matsuo (Google) wrote: > > > Hi Per, > > Thanks for sending the details. First thing comes to mind

[google-appengine] Re: Calculation of frontend hours seems off by almost factor 2.

limit the instances reliably, I would love to hear how you do it. We have maybe 0.5 to 1 requests per second on average (the QPS up there in the screenshot is only a snapshot for the past minute). Our average response time is around 300ms. Occasionally more, occasionally less. It's no

Re: [google-appengine] Scheduler/billing changes in 1.6.5? My daily cost went from $5 to $35.

ange that should be documented. Okay, maybe it's just our application, but our pricing has increased steeply. I just posted another message about the frontend hour calculation. Both issues combined seem to have led to a pricing increase from $5 to $10 before, to now $30 to $50. Our request per

[google-appengine] Calculation of frontend hours seems off by almost factor 2.

Hi Google team, according to my understanding the F4 instances incur 4 instance hours per actual hour. Assuming an average of 2 instances over the past 14 hours, we should be at 2*14*4 = 112 instance hours, not at 205. I understand that this data may not be exact, so maybe we should be at

[google-appengine] Should my memcache stats worry me? Oldest item 10-20 minutes, 10mb size, 65% hit rate. Seems low..?

een 5 minutes and 20 minutes old. The hit rate is between 60% and 70%. We typically have between 1 and 3 instances running, with maybe 0.5 requests per second on average. Based on gut feeling I'd say it would be beneficial if the memcache wasn't evicted that quickly, we should see high

[google-appengine] Scheduler/billing changes in 1.6.5? My daily cost went from $5 to $35.

es to spin up 3 instances on average, but we have to pay for all of them. We're at maybe 1 request per second on average, and it's all handled just fine by one instance. We're on F4, so having to pay for 2 mostly unused instances hurts. Since this seems to coincide with the 1.6.5

[google-appengine] Re: The instance scheduler still has problems

The scheduler is most likely made with larger applications in mind (hundreds of instances). I saw plenty of isses when I tried to optimise for few instances. I had very similar issues as you had, when I was on a 2/2 setting for instance. Basically I wanted to have 2 instances all the time, and

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Fwd: 1.6.4 Prerelease Now Available

> > - Billed applications which have specified additional logs storage over 1 > GB > are now being charged for that storage at $0.24/GB/month. > > What's actually happening is that we are hiding logs, but once 1.6.4 is > released, we will be deleting logs greater than 1gb. With 1.6.3 we release

[google-appengine] Re: how do I get my 'Recipients Emailed' quota back after hrd migration?

Jose would have been very helpful. How about placing that link into http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/adminconsole/migration.html ? Cheers, Per On Saturday, March 17, 2012 4:21:41 AM UTC+1, Jose Montes de Oca wrote: > > Hi, > > Please fill out this form for your use case: >

[google-appengine] Do maintentance periods really have to be during core working hours?

Although I'm overall happy with GAE, and I know that the maintenance periods "only" affect M/S. And I don't mind the occasional one either. But I find it increasingly frustrating that they always have to be scheduled in the middle of the week, and during a time that most of our US clients would

[google-appengine] Re: Application down, no graceful degradation despite checking the capabilities API

Ok, turns out this is only happening when you already have a session. The capability check does work if you don't have a session. So it's not as bad, but I'm still puzzled. Any ideas? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To vie

[google-appengine] Application down, no graceful degradation despite checking the capabilities API

878) at com.google.net.eventmanager.WorkerThreadInfo.runWorkerLoop(WorkerThreadInfo.java:134) at com.google.net.eventmanager.EventManagerImpl$WorkerThread.run(EventManagerImpl.java:1833) Cheers, Per -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google A

[google-appengine] Re: What's going on with the high latency ?

Without doubt, plenty of people will now advise you to "upgrade to the HRD for christ's sake", and then you'll read today's latest post about entity kinds gone missing during the migration, and then you'll be back at square 1. At least that's my situation right now, again. But yeah, your only choi

[google-appengine] Re: What is a good pattern to display and sort long lists? Work around the 1MB memcache limit? Or something else?

e may reach the 1M limit if we don't evict old pages quickly). Brilliant hint. I'll probably still need to implement the bucketing that Jeff mentions, but not for the next 6 months. Happy Per -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google A

[google-appengine] Re: What is a good pattern to display and sort long lists? Work around the 1MB memcache limit? Or something else?

We're already at some 100 indexes, and I'd rather not create new ones unless really needed. Cheers, Per On Feb 7, 11:36 am, Sameer Lodha wrote: > One tip is to "Zip" data before you put it into memcache. That way you > can easily store 4x to 10x more information. But agai

[google-appengine] What is a good pattern to display and sort long lists? Work around the 1MB memcache limit? Or something else?

e googling, but the main questions (and answer) was always around speeding up the initial database call. This is working fine for us, and it doesn't matter if it takes a few seconds either. Feedback from people who have dealt with similar issues would be greatly appreciated! :) Cheers, Per -

[google-appengine] Re: Frontend Instance Class (Default F1? 128MB?) All my instances have been running around 256MB

ieve the same old performance. Please tell me it's not like this, and I'll shut up instantly :) Cheers, Per On Dec 14, 12:03 pm, Scott Murphy wrote: > Hi, I am confused.  Did the default used to be F2?  All my instances run > > 128MB of ram. How is this possible?  Does t

[google-appengine] Short-notice reschedule of maintenance mode

understood that this *can* happen, and I don't want to sound too negative either, just saying it's not ideal for us, and possibly to others too who rely on the datastore for most operations in the application. Cheers, Per -- You received this message because you are subscribed to th

[google-appengine] Re: a happy developer

! Cheers, Per On Nov 30, 10:59 pm, alex wrote: > I've seen many people bashing GAE dev team, especially lately. > > What I want to say here is, I've been using it for years now and it's > pretty awesome what you guys have been doing and where you've gone >

[google-appengine] Re: Will you prohibit to keep the free instance up and running permanently? Or is it a best practice now?

It's M/S, but thanks for the quick answer. Very appreciated! Cheers, Per On Sep 7, 6:25 pm, Jon McAlister wrote: > Hi Per, > > I'm going to make a wild guess here and assume you are using the High > Replication Datastore. Apps which have selected this are presently

[google-appengine] Will you prohibit to keep the free instance up and running permanently? Or is it a best practice now?

again? Or is it fine to consume the free 1 instance permanently? Cheers, Per -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this gro

[google-appengine] Re: How do I set maximum total instances to 1 ? OR How do I run my app for free for 24 hrs a day ?

. My charge under the new pricing regime is 1ct for the day. Even if there were a bit more load, I expect additional instances would get spun up and down again pretty quickly, and not cost me (or you) much. All good! Cheers, Per On Sep 7, 11:12 am, Gerald Tan wrote: > I believe even if

[google-appengine] Re: Billing history stopped 5 day ago

ty idle). Maybe you have to change the pricing a little bit to kick off the job for the billing history. Cheers, Per On Sep 7, 11:51 am, Alex Popescu wrote: > In the light of the new billing details, I've made some changes to the Max > Idle Instances and Min Pending Latenc

[google-appengine] Re: Google, What are you doing? (suggestion)

ilure in management to me. This does not seem like the best way to treat your customers. When you said "second half of 2011", why didn't you pick mid October or mid November instead if you didn't have solutions to these problems yet. Could have saved you a lot of frustration from

[google-appengine] Our new performance tuning "best practices" document

.com/app-engine-performance-tuning Nothing earth-shattering, but upfront knowledge would have saved us a lot of work. Happy to add more hints if you have any. Thanks again to Simon Knott for suggesting to check out JARing classes to improve speed. You're our hero! Cheers, Per -- You r

[google-appengine] Re: How to deal with the current Memcache outages?

Actually, forget it, my mistake. I think I was simply not catching enough exceptions while putting stuff into the memcache. Obviously, you should never reply on the memcache being there at all, and just go to the datastore instead. Must drink more coffee before posting. Sorry about that! Per

[google-appengine] How to deal with the current Memcache outages?

"disabled" -- it would be nice if you could query the error rate just as it shows up on the system status. Or do some other tools or libs exist (I'm on Java..)? I'm open to other ideas, how does everyone else deal with this outages and error rates? Any other suggestions wo

[google-appengine] Re: Classloading still way too slow. Any recommended practices? (yes, I am using warmup requests already)

Actually, you're right, never mind the "behind the scenes" business. But if your internal tests confirm that JARs are faster to load, please add a note to the docs, this would have saved me a lot of time experimenting with various workarounds. Cheers, Per On Aug 20, 12:21 am, Jos

[google-appengine] Re: Classloading still way too slow. Any recommended practices? (yes, I am using warmup requests already)

The classes above took anything from 100ms to 500ms under normal conditions, and could take up to several seconds when things got really pear-shaped. Now that everything is jarred up, the classloading happens in 20ms to 30ms on average, pretty much as it does on the local devserver. I am sure it wi

[google-appengine] Re: Classloading still way too slow. Any recommended practices? (yes, I am using warmup requests already)

the local devserver and the actual production system is really massive in this respect, and it's been haunting me for a while now. A simple bullet-point "please deploy jars only" would be nice. Cheers, Per On Aug 16, 5:30 pm, Simon Knott wrote: > Have you tried deploying t

[google-appengine] Re: Classloading still way too slow. Any recommended practices? (yes, I am using warmup requests already)

racters.PersonTab"); } catch (ClassNotFoundException e) { e.printStackTrace(); } Cheers, Per On Aug 16, 2:27 pm, Simon Knott wrote: > Are these classes your own, or from third-party libraries?   > > Do you deploy your own classes inside a JAR, or just within WEB-INF class

[google-appengine] Classloading still way too slow. Any recommended practices? (yes, I am using warmup requests already)

s not a guarantee. So my question: Is there a recommended way of loading classes before the user tries to get them? Is there a way to "chain" warmup requests for instance, e.g. a guarantee that the next request will be on the same instance? That would help a lot. Cheers, Per PS: As much as

[google-appengine] Re: GAE Starts dynamic instances for no reason... causing unnecessary cold start delays

3 to, so I'd at least avoid having 3-7 new idle VMs per request and always hitting luke-warm instances. That's better, but there is still an awful lot of spinning up and spinning down going on, and every 3rd or 4th request or so still goes to a "warm-but-not-hot" VM, taking 3 secon

[google-appengine] Re: Thursday 7/14 Downtime

not handled as well as it should have been. But, I'm happy to learn, please let me know what the best way is to stay up to date reliably. Cheers, Per On Jul 13, 7:14 am, "Nick Johnson (Google)" wrote: > Hi Ryan, > > On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 12:33 AM, Ryan Goldstein wrote:

[google-appengine] Re: Error when deploying to dev server

I am seeing the same error after upgrading from 1.3.0 to 1.3.1. Strange. Did you find a solution? Cheers, Per -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegrou

[google-appengine] Re: Error: Server Error from Android phone, no log

Thanks for the reply. Currently I am unable to reproduce the error. I will investigare it further if it reappears and post here. Cheers, Per Sandström On Nov 24, 1:09 am, "Ikai L (Google)" wrote: > I'd like to try to replicate this error, but I am getting a 401 when I

[google-appengine] Re: Error: Server Error from Android phone, no log

quite soon, and then the datastore will be much larger. On Nov 12, 8:28 pm, "Ikai L (Google)" wrote: > What is the exact error? Also, can you host a static asset and try to > retrieve it with the Android application? I want to rule out that it's a > connectivity issue. &g

[google-appengine] Error: Server Error from Android phone, no log

I am doing an app that is supposed to be used from my android phone. Some communication with my GAE-app works, but when I try to send a post-message to http://pg-sandstrom-guestbook.appspot.com/checklists I get a server error. This only holds true from my android phones. Nothing is shown in the Ad

[google-appengine] one servlet stopped working

So I just noticed that one of my servlets has stopped working. I get att 500 error message. In the admin console, instead of a crash as I expected, I am getting this message below. What is it? 40 seconds and no CPU used. Is this temporary problems with google apps engine? It has been like this all

[google-appengine] how to delete indexes with java SDK

The indexes required by my app was not automatically added. So I added them in the datastore-indexes-auto.xml and deployed my app. However this has only led to me having three different entities on the same table, each holding different indexes. What I want to do is to remove the two entities that

[google-appengine] DatastoreNeedIndexException, but index present and serving

Im trying to perform this query: Query query = pm.newQuery(ListStore.class); query.setFilter("user == userParam"); query.setOrdering("listPosition ASC"); query.declareParameters("long userParam"); List listStoreLists = (List) query.execute (user); My index looks like this: ListStore listPositio