Re: [MBZ] 124 Control Arm Bushings

2005-11-17 Thread Dave M.
John,

The dealer is either lazy or mis-informed:

You can buy the bushings separately, for something like $100 per side
(list price). Labor to install shouldn't be more than a couple hours
per side, plus alignment. I have a hard time seeing this job over
$500-$600, even at the dealership. They need to pull the control arms,
with the spring compressor, but it's not THAT difficult or time
consuming. The ball joints are replaceable separately, if they are
good, you do NOT have to change them.

Now, for cars with an M104 or M119 engine, the control arms are
different. The bushings are still replaceable separately, however the
ball joints are NOT... they are welded into the arm, requiring
complete replacement of the arm. The whole new arm is bloody expensive
at ~$400/each, list.

If so inclined, you can choose to have Sportline bushings installed,
intead of the squishy stock bushings. The price is almost the same.

:-)

-Dave M.

 --
 Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2005 09:20:17 -0500
 From: John Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: [MBZ] 124 Control Arm Bushings


 I brought  my '91 300D 2.5 74k miles in to the dealer to diagnose a slight
 clunking sound in the front end over uneven pavement.  They say the noise is
 the control arm bushings, which sounds reasonable, but they say that they
 have to change the ball joints, that it is all one piece.  Total price for
 job, $900 including 4 wheel alignment.  I didn't want to let them do the
 work until I had a second opinion.

 Is this true that they have to change the ball joints along with the control
 arm bushings?  They said the ball joints had no play at all in them.

 John Peterson
 Kingston RI 1991 300D 2.5 74k



Re: [MBZ] Clicking noises from behind glovebox

2005-11-19 Thread Dave M.
Hi Aaron,

I've heard what you describe and I agree that the source of the noise
is the 7-port vacuum manifold. However I have *no* idea if it's the
manifold itself that's the problem, or if it's getting an erratic, or
weak, signal from the ACC brain (pushbutton unit). I'd love to hear if
anyone else has encountered this. I forget which of my cars does this
occasionally, but it hasn't been bad enough (or frequent enough) for
me to make a mental note to fix it. (Yet...!)

;-)

-Dave M.



 --
 Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2005 13:23:25 -0800
 From: Aaron Lam [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: [MBZ] Clicking noises from behind glovebox


 Hi all,

 My 1987 300D has recently developed this problem, and I'm sure other
 124 owners have experienced this as well. On a cold morning after
 initial startup, I hear a constant clicking noise from behind the
 glovebox that goes away after about 5 minutes. It's definitely ACC
 related - there's no clicking noise if the ACC is switched off. My
 first guess is the vacuum manifold behind the glovebox - do these go
 bad after a while and cause the clicking issue?

 -Aaron
 1987 300D
 1987 300TD



Re: [MBZ] way too much for this car

2005-11-21 Thread Dave M.
Book values are meaningless, and usually way low, for cars that are
rare and/or were imported in limited numbers. I think there were maybe
1500 diesel wagons imported to the USA back in 1987 and I bet less
than 5% remaining today are anywhere near as clean as this one. That
was also the last year Mercedes imported ANY diesel wagon to the USA.
I would have expected it to sell for mid-teens since it was almost
entirely restored. $3615 wouldn't even cover the cost of the *parts*
that were recently installed on that car. If you want the ultimate
diesel wagon in the USA, you have exactly one choice... from almost 20
years ago.

 --
 Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2005 13:33:14 -0800
 From: Gabriel S. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [MBZ] way too much for this car


 That car isn't even worth even $4,000. Whoever payed 10K for it got ripped
 off. Here is how its appraised in the kelly blue book:

 *$3,615 - in excellent condition with all options (including leather)*



Re: [MBZ] Opinions (was: WAY too much for this car)

2005-11-22 Thread Dave M.
Hi Donald,

I understand where you're coming from, and usually I'd agree that is
was a little on the high side. And, I don't trust photos that much
either. However, if you read the entire text of the ad, almost every
high-dollar failure has been addressed. That includes the A/C system,
tranny, and rear SLS not to mention almost everything else. The other
thing that's hard to determine sight unseen is horsepower, and trying
to get anyone to clock it properly with a GPS and stopwatch is nearly
impossible. This guy even provided a DYNO graph, for cryin' out loud.
The only thing I saw that I could gripe about was an aftermarket hood
pad (not 'Genuine Mercedes'). Even the console wood was restored.
Another list member paid $9k for a sedan in mint condition (not
restored) in the past year and has been more than happy with the
purchase. Yeah, you can buy a wagon for $4-$5k, and pat yourself on
the back thinking you got a great deal, then spend another $5k over
the following few years fixing everything that's not perfect. Me, I'd
rather buy the right car up front and spend my weekends and evenings
doing something fun. I still say it was worth $10k. Remember, you
can't compare 1990's W124 model pricing to this particular car -
apples and oranges! Just because a 1993 300D will sell for half that,
ditto for an E320 wagon, doesn't mean this 87 is overpriced.

As to the previous sale falling through, I bet it was either an
overzealous bidder, or someone couldn't get a loan, or something along
those lines. If there's something really wrong with the car, then yes
it's not worth $10k. As detailed and anal as that guy appears, I'd be
surprised if that was the case though.

I think Marshall summarized it best, though. The value is determined
by what someone is willing to pay, and in this case it was north of
$10k. I wonder what it would have fetched via the duPont Registry,
instead of a limited-time eBay ad.

=)

+dm

 --
 Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2005 15:59:22 -0600
 From: Donald Snook [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: [MBZ] Opinions are like a**holes  (was WAY too much for this
car)

 You are both wrong (and right).



 I do understand that something is worth whatever you can get someone to
 pay for it, but there are limits.  Sometimes, people pay too much and
 other times too little.  This particular wagon is unique, it is in great
 condition, and it is a highly desirable car. But, I do agree the price
 paid was MUCH too high for this car.  This exact wagon was on ebay a few
 weeks ago and now it is back.  I wonder why the sale was not finalized
 before? I find it hard to swallow that over $10,000 for this car is
 equivalent to stealing it.  A car with this many miles (in this
 condition) just doesn't EVER sell for this kind of money.  So, how does
 paying more than anybody else has for a car indicate that they stole it.
 Having said that, I would love to have a perfect 1991 Jeep Grand
 Waggoneer with all the options and in pewrfect shape.  They are selling
 on some websites for over $22,.  If I had an extra $20K (that my
 wife didn't know about) and I could find one, I might be the proud owner
 of a Waggoneer.



 I also think relying on the bluebooks just won't work right now.  These
 particular cars are selling for much more than KBB or NADA or Edmunds
 has them listed.  Any older Mercedes (if it is in this kind of shape)
 will always bring more than the books say.  It is a seller's market for
 these Diesel Wagons.  My stepbrother bought one just like it last year
 with only 140,OOO miles and real leather seats (they were not brand new,
 but they are perfect).  It also had NO dings and scrapes like this one
 has.  He paid $6500 for it.  He thought he got a great deal - maybe he
 did.  I wouldn't pay that much for one of these, but a LOT of people
 will.





 Donald H. Snook



Re: [MBZ] ADMIN: Gabriel

2005-11-22 Thread Dave M.
Gosh, and we were almost starting to tolerate the little tyke. (Not!)
You should sign him up for Banned, if he's not already over there. He
was already on my 'ignore' list, but thanks for saving me the trouble
in the future.

=)

+dm

 --
 Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2005 20:13:12 -0600
 From: Kaleb C. Striplin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: [MBZ] ADMIN: Gabriel


 Just wanted to let everyone know that Gabriel has become the first
 member to be banned from the list.  Sorry it has come to that but he
 just didn't seem to get with the program.  His comments were not
 conducive to a friendly list environment.  Anyway, now things should get
 back to normal.



Re: [MBZ] OM602/603 Vacuum Pump Dam Gasket

2005-11-23 Thread Dave M.
I'll second that request. My engine is one of the rare few that
require the dam gasket, and they are no longer available for purchase
anywhere that I know of (but they do come with all new vacuum pumps -
go figure.) I'm fresh out of spares, so if anyone has extras (after
Tan gets one), I'm also in the market. ;-)

For those of you scratching your head, here's a photo to clear things up:

http://www.w124performance.com/images/OM603_misc/vac_pump_gaskets.jpg

:-)

-Dave M.

 --
 Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2005 06:29:21 -0800 (PST)
 From: Tan Qu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: [MBZ] OM602/603 Vacuum Pump Dam Gasket


 Anyone on the list has a Dam gasket and not going to
 use it? If so, I would like to buy it. Thanks.


 Tan



Re: [MBZ] ACC madness

2005-11-27 Thread Dave M.
Casey,

The 7-port manifold is part number 124-800-07-78, about $100 (ouch)
from Rusty. Those of you wondering what we're talking about, check out
this photo:

http://img.eautopartscatalog.com/live/O404573890OES.JPG

The EPC seems to indicate that the same item is use on all W124's
regardless of model year or powertrain. As to the probability of it
being bad, or how to test it, I really don't know. I would think that
it could be bench tested with a 12V supply and a MityVac but I've
never had a need to (yet). Maybe Aaron could locat a used one from
Pick-n-Pull for you?

As a temp fix, your theory about plumbing in a manual trigger should
work fine. Or just connect a T to the main vacuum feed line for the
winter. Even on max defrost, I think the footwell flaps remain open
(but I'd have to check the ACC manual to verify that.)

:-)

-dm

 --
 Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2005 07:44:46 -0800
 From: Zeitgeist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [MBZ] ACC madness


 On 11/26/05, Jim Cathey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  You _are_ sure that the pod works, and doesn't have a microscopic leak?
  The footwell pod gets a vacuum restrictor in its line, so it is the
  most sensitive to the beginnings of a diaphragm tear.

 Last year I just split the supply line for vacuum to the 7 port
 manifold and sent it directly to the footwell pod (always on) -- the
 pod held vacuum just fine.

  I can't remember if you've proven the system out already.  (No leaks, 
  voltage as req'd
  to the vacuum valve.)

 No, I've been lazy so far and haven't done a stellar job of
 diagnostics yet.  The cryptic references, unhelpful diagrams and
 wooden prose of the CD's repair procedures make my eyes glaze over...

 Casey
 Olympia, WA



[MBZ] Cool E55 commercial

2005-11-28 Thread Dave M.
A buddy of mine recently informed me that he purchased a W211 E55. I
am currently turning multiple shades of green with envy. I now need to
make an out of state road trip to go beg for a ride. For those of you
not familiar with the beastly E55, here's a cute commercial that very
accurately conveys what the car is capable of:

http://www.classic-roadster.de/albums/Filme-amg/AMG_E55_The_Monster_Adve
rtise.mov

Note: The W210 (previous generation, 99-03) E55 was *not*
supercharged, and was approximately as fast as my 'old-school' W124
Q-ship. The W211 version, however, has a WHOLE 'nuter beast under the
hood, as seen in the ad above! By comparison, my little M119 just has
a couple of hamsters on steroids under the bonnet.

:-)

--
Dave M.
Boise, ID
1994 E500 - 95kmi  (Q-ship)
1987 300D - 261kmi (Sportline)



Re: [MBZ] OM603 oil consumption (was: turbo seal?)

2005-11-29 Thread Dave M.
Howdy Nick,

It sounds like you may have a few different issues here. My comments:

1) Don't use any oil that is xW-30 or thinner. The second number is
the important one, not the first. You want the Mobil-1 5W-40 or 15W-50
variants. Oil consumption may increase with that 5W-30 (or, heaven
forbid, even thinner oil) in the crankcase.

2) You've not mentioned the number of miles per quart. In my limited
experience, a good, tight OM60x engine should use a quart of oil or
less per 6000 miles or so. I wouldn't lose sleep over 4k per quart,
but any worse than that and I'd want to know where it was going. If
you're in the 2k - or 1k (!) - range, that's bad.

3) The oil leak on the passenger side under the head, above the
thermostat housing, is somewhat common - and it's NOT the cause of
your problems. There's a pressurized oil passage in that corner.
Slightly tightening the two bolts that 'bookend' the passage may slow
the leak, but this is not without some risk. I did it on my white '87
and it helped a little. Make sure it's not just a leak from the chain
tensioner, which may be cured with a new aluminum seal.

4) The oil leaks at the injection pump are also somewhat normal,
although annoying. Re-sealing the injection pump is a pretty major
job, but it sure is nice to have a leak-free pump. I've done this on
my cars. You can change a couple of the gaskets without removing the
pump but it's still a LOT of work. Again, this has nothing to do with
your oil consumption problem.

5) The smoke at startup wouldn't bother me much, as long as oil
consumption was not excessive. My guesses would be valve guides/seals,
failing turbo seals, or the head gasket failure by the #1 cylinder.
None of these are particulary common problems however, and all are
kind of hard to troubleshoot.

6) Low power - is this low power off-idle (pulling away from a stop
sign), or low power at mid/high RPM under full load? This could be a
simple as a slightly blocked ALDA line, or fuel filters in need of
replacement, or it could indicate the head gasket problem (but I'd
expect more smoke if that was the case).

7) Although it's not likely, it's a remote possibility that the engine
really does NOT like the thin 5W-30 oil you're currently using, and
maybe just switching back to 15W-50 might reduce consumption
noticeably. It's worth a shot, IMO...

:-)

Best regards,

--
Dave M.
Boise, ID
1994 E500 - 95kmi  (Q-ship)
1987 300D - 261kmi (Sportline)


 --
 Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2005 08:23:02 -0800 (PST)
 From: Nick Gough [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [MBZ] turbo seal?


 Marshall,

  During the last 3 weeks, when I did not have the car plugged-in at night 
 during the colder weather, it blew blue smoke out the tailpipe upon statrup. 
 As soon as the engine warms up just a little bit, the smoke disappears.

  It is also a bit slower than normal, too.

  I changed the oil and filter about 6 weeks ago and thought I'd try using 
 5w30 Mobil 1 after searching all over for the new 10w40 Truck  SUV Mobil 1. 
 I've gone thru 2 additional qts since then.

  I don't want to sell the car, either. I will be keeping it for awhile longer.

  If this is a head gasket leak, that would explain some oil residue on the 
 pass side of the front of the engine, as well as some on the injector pump. 
 The car leaks small amounts of ATF, but not motor oil that I can tell.

  The coolant reservoir is clean and always at the proper level.

  I will check out the areas around the head gasket in the front.

  Thx.


  Nick Gough
  86 300 SDL 171k
  93 300E 2.8 127k
  97 Jetta 70k



Re: [MBZ] 300E, 305K miles

2005-12-01 Thread Dave M.
This would be a 300E with a 3.0L, M103 inline 6 engine. It's quite a
robust powerplant really, but old-school technology with
quasi-mechanical fuel injection that is a real bear to keep working
properly. (Don't ask how I know.) It's also underpowered, IMO.

However, the engines should last a LONG time. They usually need a
valve job (guides/seals) by 150k, the symptom is high oil consumption
(quart per 1500 miles or worse). But the bottom ends usually last
almost as long as the diesels. If properly maintained, I wouldn't be
surprised to see 500k+ on the original engine, with a couple of valve
jobs in between. 300k wouldn't scare me away if the car was cheap, ran
well, didn't blow smoke or puke fluids. I'll probably end up selling
my pristine 300E eventually, simply because I just don't like the
anemic (torque-free) powerplant, and the (relative to a diesel) poor
MPG.

:-)

-Dave M.

 --
 Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2005 17:32:30 -0500
 From: Tom Scordato [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [MBZ] E 300  305K miles


 Larry T is reported to have said

 Also, with 305k what kind of work has been done to the engine  tranny?  If
 it were a diesel it *might* be on the original engine, but I doubt a gasser
  would
 

 I know nothing about these cars whether they last 40,000 miles or 900,000
 miles.  Like you Larry, I am still in the last century with the 617.9 four
 and five banger non turbo diesels. If anyone are interested in going back
 and forth with the seller contact me off line, [EMAIL PROTECTED]  I believe
 drive train is original though.  Like you Larry, I am still in the last
 century with the 617.9 four and five banger non turbo diesels.  thanks Larry
 T.

 Tom Scordato
 Bellefonte PA
 1977 300D 261K miles
 1979 240D 76K miles



Re: [MBZ] 1991 350 SDL

2005-12-01 Thread Dave M.
Hi,

Tom's answer pretty much mirrors my thoughts. Could be a really nice
car if you want a late W126 diesel, and are willing to deal with
potential engine problems. If you're not familiar with the ill-fated,
rod-bending 3.5L diesel, here's some info for you:

http://www.mbz.org/info/complaints/350SD/

:-)

-Dave M.

 --
 Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2005 22:39:59 -0600
 From: Tom Hargrave [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [MBZ] 1991 350 SDL


 All depends, has the engine been replaced yet. And if not, does it use any
 oil?

 If the first answer is Yes then it's probably worth the price.

 If both answers are no then it's probably still worth the price as long as
 you understand that you may be facing engine issues in the near future.

 If the engine has not been replaced and it's using any amount of oil then
 I'd run away, fast. And then, maybe Kaleb can buy it for $500.00..

 Thanks,
 Tom Hargrave
 256-656-1924
 www.kegkits.com



Re: [MBZ] Photos of K-Mac rear camber kit

2005-12-02 Thread Dave M.
Hi Aaron,

Wow, I almost missed your post buried in the digest! Anyway, you are
correct on all counts. To reduce negative camber, the bottom of the
tire is pulled inward, same as AMG did on the original Hammer. The tie
rod eccentrics must allow more adjustment but I don't know the specs.
There's also a factory tie rod eccentric that allows more adjustment -
it's buried in the EPC somewhere, the cost is quite high, and I don't
know if it's any help without the camber adjustment anyway.

:-)

--
Dave M.
Boise, ID
1994 E500 - 95kmi  (Q-ship)
1987 300D - 261kmi (Sportline)


 --
 Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2005 00:39:20 -0800
 From: Aaron Lam [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [MBZ] Photos of K-Mac rear camber kit

 Dave,

 I know I'm jumping into this topic a bit late. From what I see, the
 KMAC bushings replace the inner bushing on the big spring link and the
 bushing on the rear tie rod, correct? So to decrease negative camber,
 adjustment of the eccentric bolts would pull the inner part of the
 rear wheel *closer* to the car, wheras the Speedtek adjustable camber
 arms push the top of the wheel *outward*? Do the KMAC eccentric bolts
 for the tie rod offer a bigger range of adjustment compared to the
 stock tie rod eccentrics?

 -Aaron
 1987 300D
 1987 300TD




Re: [MBZ] Replacement Key was: my wife did it!

2005-12-08 Thread Dave M.
Andrew,

It's possible the locks were changed, resulting in your current
dilemma. Try the trunk lock too. Another possibility is that the locks
are original, but MB has the wrong data on file for the key code for
your VIN. This is rare, but it does happen. I had that problem on my
1984 300D. They won't believe you - and will insist the locks were
changed - unless you can produce one of the original master keys with
the red dot. None of the options to rectify this are pleasant. You'll
need to extract what's left of the broken key, and get a locksmith to
make copies of it. Several of them. Keep one at home in a safe place,
away from the car. If you're really anal, you can have all the locks
on the car converted to fit the dealer's VIN-cut key, eliminating any
future headaches.

Lesson to everyon else: If you don't have AT LEAST one spare key for
your car, get one immediately. For cars with 'security' keys (W124,
201, 140, etc) it's cheaper to buy the dealer VIN-cut keys - call
Rusty. Even if you have an old double-cut key (like on the W123's),
it's still a good idea to order one dealer key just to make sure the
VIN-cut key fits your locks. Or just order a new ignition lock
tumbler, which will include a new steel VIN-cut key. If the tumbler is
20+ years old, I strongly recommend doing this as preventive
maintenance anyway. I replaced both my W124 tumblers (1986  1987) in
the past year, and the old tumblers showed *significant* wear,
although they were still operating acceptably. I did the same for my
dad's 1987 300D as well - it was also quite worn. If you wait until it
seizes up, it's either 5 hours or $500+ to repair. Do it now in 5
minutes and $75 for the new tumbler...

:-)

-Dave M.

 --
 Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2005 12:28:59 -0700
 From: Chuck Landenberger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [MBZ] Replacement Key was: my wife did it!

 Andrew,

 Simple conclusion IMHO.  A PO had new ignition and door locks
 installed hence the VIN match won't work

 Take care,

 Chuck
 Phoenix AZ
 
 On Dec 8, 2005, at 12:15 PM, andrew strasfogel wrote:

  And MY son's friend broke off his ONLY key in the door lock (1985
  300D).  He (son) obtained a replacement key from the dealer based
  on the VIN but it fits neither the front PS door (the broken key is still
  lodged in the driver's sdie door lock) nor the ignition.  Suggestions,
  anyone?
 



Re: [MBZ] Trans shifting hard on 123 when cold

2005-12-09 Thread Dave M.
Lee,

My 1984 300D was using about 1 quart of oil per 1500 miles when I
bought it. I switch to Mobil-1 synthetic and drove the snot out of it,
and over the next 10kmi or so the oil consumption gradually about
halved... got to a quart per 2500-3000 miles or so at best. You might
just need to give it some TLC. Also, if the car has the old 'round
tube' PCV breather from valve cover to air cleaner, replace it with
the flat rubber part instead. I think that was a good part of my
improved oil consumption. Don't let the repair shop scare you.

About the tranny shifting, it could be slightly misadjusted, or have a
vacuum leak. If the tranny fluid hasn't been changed in over 25kmi,
that's the FIRST thing to do. Replace the fluid and filter, make sure
both the pan AND torque converter are drained. If it's not leaking
badly (I assume it's not), use Mobil-1 synthetic ATF. This can
significantly improve the cold shifting characteristics. However, the
W123 vintage trannies (through 1984) are known for neck-snapping 1-2
upshifts when warm, let alone cold...!

:-)

Best regards,

Dave M.

 --
 Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2005 20:06:39 -0600
 From: Kaleb C. Striplin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [MBZ] Trans shifting hard on 123 when cold


 yet another reason to learn how to work on your car yourself otherwise
 you will go broke at the dealer.

 Lee Einer wrote:

  Hi, all-
 
  My wife's 1980 300CD is in the shop. I brought it in to have the glow
  plugs replaced because they were demonstratably bad (murder to get
  started when cold, white smoke on start-up, glow plug light on dash
  blinking.)
 
  Then, the dealership called back and said they found a bad injector
  which needed replacing. OK.
 
  They just called back and asked me how much deeper they should go
  because it is burning oil and the trans isn't shifting right.
 
  OK, by how much deeper, they mean, into my pockets, I get that, but
  the trans thing I am curious about-
 
  The trans shifts just fine when the beast is warmed up. It shifts
  whiplash-stiff when the car is cold. How concerned should I be about this?
 



Re: [MBZ] LeMans Audi R8

2005-12-09 Thread Dave M.
Wow. Note there's no paddle shifters, he has to take his hand off the
wheel to shift that beast. Brave guy, what with rock walls all
around...!

=)

+dm

 --
 Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2005 21:55:51 EST
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: [MBZ] LeMans Audi R8


 LeMans Audi R8 demo run @ Rally de Catalonia in Spain

 http://www.isellbendrealestate.com/video_clips/2005_gemenos_castellana.wmv

 Turn up your sound on this one. 10MB download.



[MBZ] 1 Viper + 1 Ferrari + 1 Idiot

2005-12-09 Thread Dave M.
Freakin' IDIOT!

*shakes head*

Oh yeah - that's one more reason ABS is a good idea on street cars.


http://www.break.com/articles/vipervsferrari.html?t=4422


--
Dave M.
Boise, ID
1994 E500 - 95kmi  (Q-ship)
1987 300D - 261kmi (Sportline)



Re: [MBZ] 1 Viper + 1 Ferrari + 1 Idiot

2005-12-09 Thread Dave M.
Good catch, Dave. My guess it that they had a couple of roadside
cameramen along the route to get footage that wasn't in-car. The Viper
driver probably was trying to show off a little for the camera and
overcooked it. I can't imagine anyone purposely diving off a cliff for
kicks - the guy was lucky he wasn't hurt worse.

=)

+dm

 --
 Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2005 13:34:58 -0500
 From: dave walton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [MBZ] 1 Viper + 1 Ferrari + 1 Idiot

 It's a good video, but me thinks it is more than coincidence that of
 all the places along a multi-mile road course, they happen to have a
 cameraman standing at the roadside roughly half way between where the
 car comes around the corner, passes by, and then happens to go over
 the edge.

 -Dave Walton
 94 S350, 99 E300

 On 12/9/05, Dave M. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 
  http://www.break.com/articles/vipervsferrari.html?t=4422



Re: [MBZ] LeMans Audi R8

2005-12-10 Thread Dave M.
No automatic tranny on that puppy, not even a paddle-shift manual.
Watch his right hand closely - that's a good ol'-fashioned stick
shift. About his lines, remember that was probably more of an
exhibition run for the masses. I could be wrong, though... but I have
a hard time imagineing they run actual timed races along rock walls
and cliffs like that. (Well, then there's the Isle of Man TT... where
a couple participants die every year...)

O_o

Still a cool video, though!


-Dave M.

 --
 Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2005 22:20:57 -0700
 From: Craig McCluskey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [MBZ] LeMans Audi R8


  LeMans Audi R8 demo run @ Rally de Catalonia in Spain
 
  http://www.isellbendrealestate.com/video_clips/2005_gemenos_castellana.wmv
 
  Turn up your sound on this one.?

 A most powerful car. I presume it has an automatic transmission.

 The car certainly does accelerate very quickly. The driver, though seemed
 a little tentative and lacking smoothness in several spots and in some
 corners took less than an ideal line through. Not that I would do much
 better -- or even as well.


 Craig



[MBZ] OT: Super Caddy

2005-12-14 Thread Dave M.
Wow! Anyone care to mimic this with an ol' 6.9...?

:-)

--
Dave M.
Boise, ID
1994 E500 - 95kmi  (Q-ship)
1987 300D - 261kmi (Sportline)


 -- Forwarded message --
 From: Tim W [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Date: Dec 14, 2005 4:10 AM
 Subject: Caddy
 To: Dave M. [EMAIL PROTECTED]


 http://www.schwartzperformance.com/cadillac.htm

 Couldn't stop chuckling while reading this... Very impressive for an old
 American boat.

Tim W.



Re: [MBZ] Vacuum pump question answered, plus rant

2005-12-15 Thread Dave M.
Hi Brian,

I missed the type of car here, but I gather it's a W124 or W126 with
an OM603 engine. I've tinkered with those a little myself, and have a
couple of comments. First, you need to test vacuum directly at the
port on the pump - disconnect the hose that goes to the 4-way branch
fitting. If there's zero vacuum from the pump, the pump is bad (or the
port is blocked somehow). The pump isn't cheap, either. If the pump
does NOT have 4 Torx-head screws in the front cover, it should be
replaced on principle even if it is working OK.

Anyway, if there is a leak on any of the vacuum 'consumers', that can
cause all the other vacuum operated items to not function. That would
be the emissions junk (which can be disabled), the tranny (which will
shift harshly with no vacuum), and the climate control vent flaps. The
large port on the vac pump feeds both the power brake booster *and*
the engine shutoff. If the engine won't shut off, it could be the
diaphragm on the injection pump, a leak in the brake booster pipe, or
(once again) a bad vacuum pump.

It sounds like you have verified that the pump is bad, but first I'd
want to disconnect both ports, plug the large one, and measure at the
small one. A big leak on the main port could possibly cause no vacuum
present at the small port. (?) Don't mess around with that idler
pulley - the serpentine belt system is not something to screw with, it
can cause the timing cover to fracture (read  to fix). If the belt
isn't perfectly parallel at the tensioner/idler pulleys, REPLACE the
idler lever. The idler puley only needs replacement if the bearing is
bad. Only use an OE (Genuine Mercedes) belt shock - the eyelet
bushings are different than the OEM (aftermarket) shocks.

I'm sorry you had a bad experience with that shop. I remember Stefan's
name from the previous (MBZ.org) list, I had forgotten he sold the
car. Wasn't that a 350SDL...?


Best regards,

--
Dave M.
Boise, ID
1994 E500 - 95kmi  (Q-ship)
1987 300D - 261kmi (Sportline)


 --
 Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 22:37:38 -0500
 From: Brian Smyla [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: [MBZ] Vacuum pump question answered, plus rant

 Thanks to all those that replied to my question about the vacuum pump port.
 I had the engine replaced with a used one, and the shop that did the work
 warranted the engine for 30 days.  The day after I picked the car up, the
 engine wouldn't stop.  I took it back to have the problem resolved, and was
 told the problem was in the vacuum transducers near the turbo.  I took the
 car back, then discovered that there wasn't any vacuum on the small port on
 the pump.  Also, the climate control had air coming from the defrost ports
 only, and the shifting was very hard, as was mentioned in some of your
 replies.

 I had a very bad experience with this engine replacement.  The shop owner
 claims to have many years experience working on MBZ products, but when I
 picked the car up, the heat didn't work (mechanic said it was a problem with
 my climate control), the starter engaged intermittently, the idler pulley
 was chafing the back side of the belt, a turbo support bracket was missing,
 and various bolts were missing here and there.  I spent three hours checking
 the climate control, only to finally figure out that the mechanic had left a
 plug in the return water pipe where it connects to the heater hose that
 comes off the monovalve.  I returned the car for repair of the other
 problems.  They fixed the starter issue, installed the turbo bracket ( after
 arguing with me on the phone for 5 minutes that the bracket didn't exist ),
 told me the idler pulley wasn't part of what was warranted ( the idler
 pulley was from the replacement engine, and I told him that since it wasn't
 under warranty, I wanted my old one back ), and said the shutoff problem was
 in the emission control transducers, which I know is BS, because there's no
 vacuum on the port to start with.



 If anyone's interested, the shop is Chaney's Auto Service in Ringgold, VA.
 I'm not going back.

 Oh, and he charged me $2000 for the replacement engine, labor to remove the
 replacement engine from the donor vehicle, promised me a 10% cash discount
 from the original quoted price, then added enough miscellaneous parts (motor
 mounts, used starter, hoses, etc..) to make up the difference.  Go figure.
 And no, it's not worth going to court over.

 And to make matters worse, I bought the car from Stefan Schultze, who
 assured me that the only thing wrong with it was bad hood hinges.  Flew to
 Indiana to pick it up, where he told me that the heater had been
 intermittently working.  Drove it back, then discovered it had a cracked
 head.  All 6 cylinders.  Refused to reply to follow up emails asking for a
 $1k concession.  I know, my fault, caveat emptor and all that.

 Thanks for letting me vent.

 Brian Smyla




Re: [MBZ] Sweet Vegas Ride, Yo

2005-12-15 Thread Dave M.
The car looks nice, but wow, he's posting NADA book values in pesos!
What's up with that? Kaleb might offer an extra ten-spot over his
usual $500 for this one.

=)

+dm™

 --
 Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 09:15:13 -0700
 From: Bob Rentfro [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: [MBZ] Sweet Vegas Ride, Yo

 Mercy

 http://makeashorterlink.com/?N2BD3415C

 Bob Rentfro
 '77 300D 144K
 Litchfield Park, AZ


Re: [MBZ] Filling tires with nitrogen

2005-12-15 Thread Dave M.
The whole idea of filling my tyres with nitrogen is fascinating.
However, I just wouldn't feel comfortable unless it was
Mercedes-approved nitrogen. Even better if it's diesel-rated. Anyone
have a part number for Rusty to quote a price on? Don't forget to Red
Loc-Tite on the adapters to the Schrader valves, so no IffyBoob
employee can accidentally contaminate that pristine N with a little H
or O2.

:-)

+dm™

 --
 Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 12:40:11 -0700
 From: Tom Reynolds [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [MBZ] Filling tires with nitrogen

 Yes, chemical reaction with compressed air and aluminum wheels,
 not so with inert nitrogen gas. Less tire filling.  Yea!

 Tom
 SS, OK

 At 10:49 AM 12/15/2005 -0800, you wrote:
 
 I understand it helps to prevent leaks with aluminum wheels. Exactly why, I
 am not sure?
 
 Randy


[MBZ] OT: Bike racing (was: Filling tires with nitrogen)

2005-12-16 Thread Dave M.
I've been waiting for someone to mention bike racing. Here's a little
taste of Moto GP for the uninitiated:

http://media.putfile.com/MotogpLifessweetdrug

Suddenly NASCAR  looks like a bunch of hicks chasing their tails in a
high-speed rush hour traffic jam, no?

dons flame suit


=)

+dm™

 --
 Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 17:46:31 -0700
 From: Tom Reynolds [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [MBZ] Filling tires with nitrogen (was Re: Year End
Specials)


 I don't think as fast, though.  Ah well, it was just a conversation
 starter.  Anyone wanna talk about F1 or bike racing?
 grin
 Tom
 Sand Springs, OK


Re: [MBZ] Filling tires with nitrogen

2005-12-16 Thread Dave M.
And in a former life, I used to amateur race production sportbikes (a
1997 GSX-R750, to be exact). Metal caps with gaskets were indeed
required and part of the tech inspection. I didn't often near 150mph
as the tracks I raced on didn't have long enough straights...
Thunderhill was the fastest, probably mid-140's every lap. Sears Point
(now Infineon) was a bit slower, but a lot hairier, and almost more
fun in a sadistic sort of way (those of you who have turned a wheel in
angst there know what I mean.)

I've found cracked plastic caps on some of my vehicles in the past. I
try to use only metal caps with gaskets on all my cars (and bike). Be
careful, some are better than others - some metal caps have no
gaskets, or poor gaskets. Plastic caps are useless except to keep dirt
out of the Schrader.

=)

+dm

 --
 Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 20:32:47 -0500
 From: Mitch Haley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [MBZ] Filling tires with nitrogen


 I used to work for a guy who raced production and showroom stock motorcycles.
 Tech inspection required metal valve caps with gaskets inside. Unless you've
 got caps like that, The Schrader valve is the only thing holding the air in.
 (on the motorcycles, the valve is precisely radial to the axle, and the valves
 can open from centripetal force at 150mph, so the caps are needed)




[MBZ] AMG Hammer for sale, cheep cheep

2005-12-16 Thread Dave M.
For $5k, *someone* needs to pick this thing up. Definitely a project
car, but considering the insane rarity of these things...! I think 13
built worldwide? Check out the photos at the link in one of the posts.
AMG had to do a lot of reinforcement of the stock 6-cyl subframe. Note
the 'Holy Grail' 190MPH speedometer face, too.

http://www.mercedesshop.com/shopforum/showthread.php3?t=91940

I'm almost glad it's not near Boise, or I'd probably already have it
in my garage. Too far away for me to trailer it back to Idaho. But
just think, with a 6.0L M119 under the hood...

:-)

--
Dave M.
Boise, ID
1994 E500 - 95kmi  (Q-ship)
1987 300D - 261kmi (Sportline)



Re: [MBZ] OM603 smoking ban

2005-12-20 Thread Dave M.
Hi Casey,

1) I think I originally received the wrong seals, and mistakenly
thought the next set of OE seals was was much better. The first set
may have been gasser seals instead of diesel. I'm still not positive
what happened there. Either way, the cost difference is minimal, and
given the complexity of this job I would still recommend OE seals. I
am curious to know if the aftermarket seal kits include the plastic
installation tubes or not (these protect the seals as they're
installed). Photo here:

http://www.w124performance.com/images/OM603_head_replacement/valve_seals.jpg


2) I bought the Sir Tools valve spring compressor. You need 3 pieces -
the bridge, the handle, and the foot. There are no instruction and
half the battle was figuring out how to use the stupid thing. It's
complete junk (the metal bends if you look at it the wrong way), but
it does work. If I was expecting to do more than one valve seal job
(on any Mercedes engine), I'd seriously consider springing for the OE
dealer tool kit (at 3x the cost). Photo of all 3 pieces is here:

http://www.w124performance.com/images/tools/valve_spring_tools.jpg


Details on that OE tool kit, which works on a bunch of engines, is in this PDF:
http://www.w124performance.com/docs/mb/tools/OM60x_valve_tools.pdf


=)

-Dave M.

 --
 Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 12:40:05 -0800
 From: Zeitgeist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: [MBZ] OM603 smoking ban


 So, in an effort to diagnose and (hopefully) fix my OM603's excessive
 blue smoking problem upon acceleration, I picked up a cheap rebuilt
 350 SDL turbo on ebay ($150), thinking it might stem a source of oil
 entering the intake stream--it didn't.  My recent compression test
 didn't reveal any anomalous readings in any of the cyls, especially
 #1, which had been thought to be a candidate for a breached chain
 vault leak--it wasn't.  So, now I'm back to valve stem seals as the
 prime culprit.  Anyone know who's the best tool source and brand name
 for the valve spring compressor used to get at the seals while the
 head is still installed?  I seem to remember Dave M saying to only use
 MB stem seals.

 Any other thoughts?

 btw:  I was able to re-clock the turbo and significantly shorten my IC
 plumbing, while installing a bigger breather setup.  I'll post pics
 and a write up on Rusty's web forum.

 Casey
 Olympia, WA



Re: [MBZ] Highway Debris 1 - Gas Tank 0

2005-12-20 Thread Dave M.
I'm confused too. There was never an E420 wagon - nor any V8 engine in
a 124 station wagon, that I know of. It must have been an E320 wagon.
All the 124 sedans have the tanks in the trunk, where it's nearly
impossible to puncture them with road debris. I do believe the 124
wagon tank is exposed under the car, though - that would make a lot
more sense.

=)

+dm™


 --
 Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 10:25:13 -0800 (PST)
 From: Curt Raymond [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [MBZ] Highway Debris 1 - Gas Tank 0


 Uhh, read what the car is again, 1995 E420 wagon. Wagon tanks are underneith.

  -Curt


Re: [MBZ] OM603 smoking ban

2005-12-20 Thread Dave M.
Hi Casey,

I forget which, but I bought mine from either Baum Tools or
Performance Products. The bridge and handle are likely the same for
M102/103, but the foot piece is - I think - specific to the OM601/2/3
engines. At approximately $200 for all three, there may be a gun and a
mask involved when placing your 'order'.

I also noticed the head supply thinned out rapidly. There were several
available a couple of months ago, but not anymore. If you can afford
it, I would seriously think about a new #22 head (OE dealer - NOT
aftermarket) since you will be, uh, breathing a little harder than
normal on it. Only the #22 has the revised oil passage in front of the
#1 cylinder. I'm not sure if that's the only change between it and the
#20, or if there are other things too. I don't know the difference
between the #17 and #20. The oil passage difference can be seen in
this photo:

http://www.w124performance.com/images/OM603_head_replacement/heads-front.jpg

:-)

HTH,

Dave M.
 --
 Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 10:16:53 -0800
 From: Zeitgeist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [MBZ] OM603 smoking ban


 Dave, Rusty's site shows a stem seal set similar to the pics you have
 of the OE versions (with a two-pack of stem condoms).

 Where did you purchase the SIR valve spring compressor?  Samstag's
 site doesn't show a version for the OM60X engines, and ZD MAK shows
 something that looks similar, but sez it's for M102 and M103 engines.
 http://makeashorterlink.com/?G2E33185C

 I'm also considering using this opportunity to finally replace my #14
 head, but of course,  the supply of #17 -- #22 heads seems to have
 all but dried up.  Other than PGA and Silver Star, are there any other
 reputable MB breakers out there to consider as potential sources?

 Casey
 Olympia, WA



Re: [MBZ] OM603 smoking ban

2005-12-20 Thread Dave M.
Hi Tan,

I think it's an optical illusion. Some of the holes are different, but
it's not a huge change. There are dark areas on the old head that can
look like holes but really aren't. The block has large openings, and
the head gasket has smaller holes to control fluid passage. Kind of an
odd setup, really. If you poke around on my website, you can see
photos of the block surface and the head gaskets too, for reference:

http://www.w124performance.com/images/OM603_head_replacement/

:-)

-Dave M.

 --
 Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 13:20:27 -0800 (PST)
 From: Tan Qu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [MBZ] OM603 smoking ban

 Dave,

 I noticed that the holes (oil and coolant pathways) on
 the new head are quite different from the old head at
 several locations. So the holes on the new head match
 the holes on block perfectly?

 Tan



Re: [MBZ] OM603 smoking ban

2005-12-21 Thread Dave M.
Believe me, Tan, both times I had the head off, *I* was amazed the
engine ran when I got it back together! ;-)

When I replaced the head, I was concerned about the wear on the timing
device cam, as shown in that photo. However I did not replace it at
that time. I've seen much worse, and since I was short on funds, I
left it alone. A few years later when my timing cover broke, I decided
it would never be easier to change the silly thing so I replaced it
then. The wear had not gotten any worse in the ~20kmi in between. That
part is not cheap, but I feel better with a fresh one installed. I
would re-use the old/worn one on a different car if necessary, though.
Photos of the new  old timer are here:

http://www.w124performance.com/images/OM603_timing_cover/

:-)

-Dave M.

 --
 Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 07:13:57 -0800 (PST)
 From: Tan Qu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [MBZ] OM603 smoking ban

 Dave,

 I am always mazed that guys like you on the list can
 put an engine together and it still runs! Speaking of
 the pictures at your website, I noticed the time
 device has some considerable wear
  
 http://www.w124performance.com/images/OM603_head_replacement/timing_device_cam1.jpg

 Did you replace it?


 Tan



Re: [MBZ] MityVac

2005-12-22 Thread Dave M.
I learned the hard way - over many years - that the MityVac is an *awful*
tool for bleeding brakes, regardless of how much they hype that use for it.
Pressure bleeding is the ONLY way to go. My MityVac doesn't go anywhere near
brake fluid anymore. I use it all the time for testing vacuum system
components, and boost pressure related items.

If anyone needs the full MityVac Silverline kit, here's a great deal:
http://www.thetoolwarehouse.net/shop/MIT-4050.html

:-)

-Dave M.

--
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 22:33:04 -0500
From: Scott Ritchey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [MBZ] MityVac

Kaleb:  If the silverline is the metal one and you get brake fluid in it, it
will never be right again.  Disassembly and cleaning may fix it for a while
but the corrosion will come back.  Disassembly is fairly obvious, as I
recall; just don't lose any parts.  I threw my silverline out and bought the
cheaper plastic version; no problems yet but I also use a pressure bleeder
now.

Scott Ritchey
Kittrell NC
1982 300SD 220K
1979 300TD 350K


[MBZ] OT: Ferrari Porn, from France

2005-12-22 Thread Dave M.
Listen to those bias-ply tyres howl! Wow. The ending is great...

http://500ecstasy.com/forums/showthread.php?t=2696
(click the link in the first post)

=)

--
Dave M.
Boise, ID
1994 E500 - 95kmi  (Q-ship)
1987 300D - 261kmi (Sportline)


[MBZ] Limo console wood install report (W124)

2005-12-22 Thread Dave M.
Hi all,

I wanted to add some extra electrical switches in my W124, and prefer a
factory appearance. Thanks to Aaron Lam, I learned there was a wood trim
piece used in the long wheelbase (limo) version W124 in Europe. This has
extra switch holes for (I assume) the 2 extra windows in the 6-door chassis.
I picked up one of these 'limo wood' panels for my 1994 E500, which
originally had 1 aftermarket switch added for the BergWerks first gear start
(FGS) kit - normal position has stock upshifts, the other position selects a
programmable upshift speed for the 1-2 part-throttle upshift.

Anyway, I wanted to replace that funky FGS switch with a factory switch.
And, I wanted to add a switch to turn on the stereo without the key in the
ignition. (On the E500, this is a big deal, with the key in position 1 the
current draw is nearly 20 amps!) I also wanted to add a momentary contact
type switch for my Valentine-1. I specifically wanted it set up so that when
the key is turned off, and then the car is re-started, the V-1 does NOT turn
back on. So, I wired up a relay to act as a 'latching' relay... momentary
contact triggers the V-1 power module (and relay), but when the key is
turned off, the relay un-latches - requiring a press of the switch to turn
it back on. In case you're wondering why, it's because of the irritating
'startup dance' that the V-1 goes through at each power-up. I don't use it
all the time, and hate listenting to that screeching every time I forget to
turn off a regular rocker switch (which is what I have right now in the
diesel.)

See links below for photos. The switch in the 'fader' position is actually
an ACC recirculation switch, which controls the V-1. When energized, the red
LED stays on. I used this switch because it was the only one I found which
has normally closed (NC) *and* normally open (NO) contacts, allowing use of
only one relay instead of two. Push up/on closes the NO contacts, push
down/off breaks the NC contacts. The right side 'child safety' switch is for
the FGS speed selection, replacing the goofy round switch on the old wood
panel. The next one down is a factory dual-tone horn switch, which I have
set up to turn the radio on  off without the key. Next to the left (in the
center) is a central lock/unlock switch, which is at present not used. To
the left of that is a 'trunk release' switch with integrated alarm LED,
again, this is not functional. I may work on making those functional in the
future, but for now they're just filling the empty spaces. All are wired so
the backlight illumination works - no dead/dark switches, lol.


Photos:

Stock 1994 E500 Burled Walnut console wood:

http://www.w124performance.com/images/cars/94_E500/restoration/limo_wood_before.jpg


New limo wood piece:

http://www.w124performance.com/images/cars/94_E500/restoration/limo_wood_after.jpg

Stock  limo wood, side by side:

http://www.w124performance.com/images/cars/94_E500/restoration/limo_wood_both.jpg


Zebrano 'limo' wood, destined for the blue diesel later this winter:
http://www.w124performance.com/images/W124_stuff/limo_woods.jpg


Sorry for the lousy photos. I'm still using a 'loaner' 2MP camera from work,
about 5 years old (translation - a fossil in digicam years.) I'd like to get
a better 'after' photo without the flash glare. I'll get a better one
eventually. My old/stock 1994 wood trim panel is for sale, pretty cheap,
since I have no use for it. Email me for details.

=)

Best regards,

--
Dave M.
Boise, ID
1994 E500 - 95kmi  (Q-ship)
1987 300D - 261kmi (Sportline)


Re: [MBZ] Limo console wood install report (W124)

2005-12-23 Thread Dave M.
Hi Aaron,

Nah, I'm too lazy to pull everything back to the main distribution
points. I tapped into one of the gray/blue wires feeding the window
switches. ;-)

Interestingly, while most MB switches require switching the
negative/ground lead (due to internal wiring of the illuminations
LED's), the recirc switch actually allows positive switching because
it has a separate ground soley for the two LED's. The only other
switch I've found that does this is the defroster, which has two NO
contacts, one of which is tied to the red LED. In the recirc switch,
the red LED is totally separate, which is kinda cool - gives you more
options. You come across these things in your PnP travels much?

:-)

-Dave M.

 --
 Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2005 19:19:10 -0800
 From: Aaron Lam [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [MBZ] Limo console wood install report (W124)


 Dave,

 For illumination did you splice into the existing grey/blue wires in
 the center console, or did you run wires under the dash to the main
 illumination distribution block thingy?

 -Aaron
 1987 300D
 1987 300TD



Re: [MBZ] nice SDL

2005-12-23 Thread Dave M.
I believe those are forged aluminum wheels, 16 x 7.0 or 7.5, used on
the original CLK (C208 chassis). I'm not too crazy about how they look
on any car, but I hear they are very light weight, more than most
Mercedes wheels. Definitely NOT a proper fitment for any S or SL class
- the offset is all wrong.

=:-o

-dm

 --
 Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2005 21:27:24 -0800
 From: Alex Chamberlain [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [MBZ] nice SDL


 Interesting wheels.  I think I've seen that design on a W202 or maybe
 a W210, but not on any S-class.  I hope he didn't use spacers to get
 them to fit.

 On 12/22/05, Kaleb C. Striplin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/Mercedes-Benz-300-Series-SDL-05755038677111853_W0QQitemZ4599349997QQcategoryZ6330QQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem




Re: [MBZ] 93 S-Class diesel (new engine?)

2005-12-24 Thread Dave M.
I noticed it has a 'MPG' gauge. I thought only gas models had this -
those are simply vacuum gauges. What in the world would drive a MPG
gauge on a diesel? Boost pressure or something? Bizarre!

BTW - I agree, this looks like a beater. And I don't trust the
seller's feedback. And I don't like private bidding. And I'd want some
kind of verification of the 'recent' engine. If it does have a factory
crate motor in there, it's almost worth it as a parts car, if the
reserve is low enough. Hmmm.

O_o

+dm

 --
 Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2005 10:34:02 -0700
 From: Craig McCluskey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [MBZ] 93 S-Class diesel (new engine?)


 On Sat, 24 Dec 2005 10:57:29 -0600 Rick Knoble [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:

  eBay car, if anyone wants me to check it out, it is not to far from my
  work.
 
  http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=4599601326


 Yes, but check out his feedback. Makes me leery.


 Craig



Re: [MBZ] 603 HP

2005-12-25 Thread Dave M.
Here ya go, Kaleb:


603.96x = 148hp @ 4600, 201lb-ft @ 2400
603.970 = 133hp @ 4000, 228lb-ft @ 2000
603.971 = 148hp @ 4000, 229lb-ft @ 2200


Max RPM (+/- 150rpm):
603.96x = 5150rpm
603.970 = 4250rpm
603.971 = 4750rpm

For 1987 models with the trap oxidizer, the power dropped to 143hp and
195 lb-ft, at the same rpm's. I tweaked my pump to have the max RPM
limit at the upper tolerance (5400 rpm). Nitpickers will note that the
older published specs show +/- 150rpm, while later specs from the WIS
show +/- 250rpm and a 5400rpm limit. The assorted spec sheets are
here:

http://www.w124performance.com/docs/mb/OM60X/

:-)

-Dave M.

 --
 Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 10:00:30 -0600
 From: Kaleb C. Striplin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: [MBZ] 603 HP

 What is the horsepower rating of the various 603's?  Im thinking the 3.0
 is 148 but not sure about the 3.5 in the 126 and in the 140.



Re: [MBZ] 93 S-Class diesel (new engine?)

2005-12-26 Thread Dave M.
Yes. The last revision of the OM603 head, casting #22, has a modified
oil passage. The previous castings were mostly open to the head
gasket, and sometimes the gasket would blow out into the timing chain
cavity and #1 cylinder. The new casting moves the passage internal to
the head with a hole at either end. In retrospect, I don't understand
why it wasn't designed like that in the first place. A photo of the
heads side by side, showing the oil passage difference, is here:

http://www.w124performance.com/images/OM603_head_replacement/heads-front.jpg

:)

-Dave M.

On 12/26/05, dave walton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I used a dial indicator with a magnetic base to measure how far the
 top of the pistons protruded from the block. Bent rods don't come up
 as far. Also measure the roundness of the cylinders at top, middle,
 and bottom.

 Didn't Mercedes change the oil passage in front of the #1 cylinder on
 the 603.97x heads in the latest versions?

 Thanks

 -Dave Walton



Re: [MBZ] Admin, transition complete

2005-12-26 Thread Dave M.
OK, after the upgrade, has anyone else on digest noticed a change in
the digest format? The posts are no longer numbered. See below for an
example. I don't miss the lack of 'message ID' or 'content type', but
I'd sure like to get the 'message number' back! I only pick out topics
from the digest index I want to read, and this allows me to quickly
locate the post within the digest. Yeah, yeah, I know all you Gmail
users love the threaded feature, but I don't like it (and I hate how
Gmail handles labels and won't save things in Sent Items if you
delete the thread. Grumble.)

=)

--
Dave M.
Boise, ID
1994 E500 - 95kmi  (Q-ship)
1987 300D - 261kmi (Sportline)



New 'updated' digest format:
*
-- Forwarded message --
From: OK Don [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Mercedes Discussion List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 12:13:05 -0600
Subject: Re: [MBZ] Admin, transition complete

That's what I do also - I find the Gmail easier to read than the
digest. All the messages with a common subject line are grouped
together in one thread.
*




Previous digest format:
*
--

Message: 4
Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2005 18:01:51 -0500
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [MBZ] Merry Christmas  Happy New Year
To: 911/993/996 digest [EMAIL PROTECTED],Ferrari List
   [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
   [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=iso-8859-1;
   reply-type=original

Best wishes to all my cyber-friends.   I depend on all ya'll to keep me
exposed to the world - and you never let me down!
*



Re: [MBZ] 1987 300DT

2005-12-27 Thread Dave M.
Hi Tom,

Yep, that's a W124 chassis, 124.133 to be exact. The engine is an
OM603.960, six-cyl turbo with aluminum head. T'was only imported to
the USA in 1987. There was a 5-cyl version imported from 1990-1993
(124.128 with 5-cyl OM602 engine), that model has less power but
better fuel economy. A more detailed look at stengths/weaknesses is at
this link (text file):

http://www.w124performance.com/docs/mb/articles/124.1x3_buying_tips.txt


BTW, I completely agree with Casey's assessment. :) My dad  sis each
have one too.

:-)

Best regards,

--
Dave M.
Boise, ID
1994 E500 - 95kmi  (Q-ship)
1987 300D - 261kmi (Sportline)
1987 300D - 247kmi (R.I.P.)

 --
 Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 17:33:00 -0500
 From: Tom Scordato [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: [MBZ]  1987 300DT

 WDBEB33D9HA285947
 Above is the  Vin.

 Can anyone tell me about these cars?  Got to start planning for when there
 will be much, much fewer  123 chassis diesel in the next 10 to 15 years.

 Need chassis number (is it 124??)
 Engine style is it a 6 cyl?
 strengths and weakness.
 Production years

 Cars look very nice.

 http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=4599012330

 Regards Tom Scordato
 Bellefonte PA



Re: [MBZ] Admin, transition complete

2005-12-27 Thread Dave M.
Kaleb,

I think I may have figured it out. I had originally selected 'MIME'
format, and that doesn't have the post numbers, and each post starts
with that 'forwarded message' header. I switched back to 'Plain Text'
and so far, it looks good. I hope it's really that simple!

:-)

-Dave M.

 --
 Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 17:26:55 -0600
 From: Kaleb C. Striplin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [MBZ] Admin, transition complete

 Im not sure why it does or does not do that.  I do know before some of
 the lists numbered them and some didnt.  Im not sure if its anything I
 can control but I will do some digging.

 Dave M. wrote:

  OK, after the upgrade, has anyone else on digest noticed a change in
  the digest format? The posts are no longer numbered. See below for an
  example. I don't miss the lack of 'message ID' or 'content type', but
  I'd sure like to get the 'message number' back! I only pick out topics
  from the digest index I want to read, and this allows me to quickly
  locate the post within the digest. Yeah, yeah, I know all you Gmail
  users love the threaded feature, but I don't like it (and I hate how
  Gmail handles labels and won't save things in Sent Items if you
  delete the thread. Grumble.)
 
  (snip)



Re: [MBZ] Germanic inter-species crossover wheel adaptation?

2005-12-27 Thread Dave M.
Casey,

I don't know for sure, but I can't see why that would NOT work, as
long as the center hub diameter is correct. Remember the MB's are
hubcentric, so that is a big deal. There are a *lot* of MB factory
wheels in the 16x7.0 and 16x7.5 size with correct offset, at pretty
decent prices if you're patient (say, $400 or less for a set with used
tires). Do you just not like the looks of most of them? I had a set of
202 Sport wheels, and 208 (CLK) wheels, on my white car. Photos here,
in case you missed them:

W202 Sport:
http://www.w124performance.com/images/cars/87_300D_white/new_wheelsL.jpg

C208:
http://www.w124performance.com/images/cars/87_300D_white/snow_shoes.jpg

:-)


-Dave M.


 --
 Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 23:41:32 -0800
 From: Zeitgeist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: [MBZ] Germanic inter-species crossover wheel adaptation?

 Has anyone successfully adapted wheels from another (preferably
 German) car make into the MB realm?  I'm fantasizing about upgrading
 my 124 to 16 rims, but I'm not too smitten by the prices or choices
 out there.  These Audi units seem to be nifty looking and run the same
 5x112mm bolt pattern,  w/35mm ET as 17 AMG monoblocks:
 http://makeashorterlink.com/?U2F612F5C
 --
 Casey
 Olympia, WA
 Biodiesel: I drive in a persistent vegetative state
 '87 300TD intercooler (211k)



[MBZ] Cheap 617.952 engine in Texas

2005-12-27 Thread Dave M.
Anyone need a turbo motor from a 1984 300D?

http://www.mercedesshop.com/shopforum/showthread.php3?t=138079

$125 ain't bad, if you're somewhere near Beaumont.

=)

--
Dave M.
Boise, ID
1994 E500 - 95kmi  (Q-ship)
1987 300D - 261kmi (Sportline)



Re: [MBZ] 124's

2005-12-27 Thread Dave M.
If it has ASD, is a decent color combo, is in nice shape, and located
in the west or southwest... *I* might be interested myself! Hopefully
it still has R-12 and wasn't downgraded to R-134a in the past.
Seriously, the price is decent if the car is in good shape.

:-)

-Dave M.


 --
 Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 12:47:09 -0500
 From: Sunil Hari [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [MBZ] 124's


 My MB mechanic is trying to sell me a 1992 300D 2.5T with 280Kmi on it - new
 transmission at 150Kmi, front end rebuilt this summer, new head, new timing
 chain, valve job, new tires, and everything works.  Few dents, no rust.

 He wants $4500 for it.  What's the consensus on that price?

 I'm interested, despite it having an auto tranny, because i've heard such
 good things from you people about the 124 sedans.



Re: [MBZ] Rear suspension link replacement - update

2005-12-27 Thread Dave M.
Sounds good, Aaron. I thought it would settle down after a little bit.
I'm curious what your final alignment specs turn out to be, with no
camber adjustment. Couple more questions:

1) 17x8.25 wheels? That's a rather unusual size, and sounds
suspiciously like the 500E Evo wheels! What shoes you runnin' on the
car these days? ;-) But yeah, you're on the ragged edge of tire
clearance without rolled fenders, that's for sure. Bet it looks
fantastic, though.

2) Did you go with Sportline front control arms, and are they early or
late style?

:-)

-Dave M.

 --
 Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 14:29:36 -0800
 From: Aaron Lam [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [MBZ] Rear suspension link replacement - update


 Thanks everyone! Perhaps the cause of my lack of negative camber was
 due to the old camber strut being somewhat worn out...? Anyhow, after
 driving around for a bit yesterday, I measured the height from the
 center of the center cap to the tip of the fender, and it's about 14
 - pretty much what it was before swapping out the links. I suppose I
 should get the rear fenders rolled soon.

 Peter: Yes, with stock wheels/tires/suspension, the rear tire
 *shouldn't* touch the fender. I'm right at the limit of clearance - I
 have 235/45/17 rear tires on a 17x8.25 ET34 wheel. Previously, I had
 *just* enough negative camber to avoid rubbing, even with two
 passengers and luggage in the trunk!

 Dave: I'll take some pics of the aluminum arm soon. As for alignment,
 I'm waiting for my new front LCA's to arrive, so I'll install those
 and the new rear tie rod before taking it to the stealer for the final
 alignment. The rear bushing at the wheel carrier end of the spring
 link needs some funky special tool (which I don't have) and the local
 MB indy can do it for about $100 (parts + labor) so I'll probably go
 that route.

 -Aaron
 1987 300D
 1987 300TD



[MBZ] Delivery valve socket for sale

2005-12-28 Thread Dave M.
It's not mine - just passing along the info. It's not OE, it's a Sir
Tools item, part# M0019. Can't beat the price, though - $10 + SH:

http://www.mercedesshop.com/shopforum/showthread.php3?t=140389


For reference, the OE tool is Mercedes part number 617-589-01-09-00
and is probably $35-$40 from Rusty. Considering that, it's somewhat
ridiculous that ST bothered making a copy that sells for more money:

http://shoptoolsshoptools.com/shopexd.asp?id=1044

O_o

--
Dave M.
Boise, ID
1994 E500 - 95kmi  (Q-ship)
1987 300D - 261kmi (Sportline)



Re: [MBZ] MB Tex / cold weather

2005-12-28 Thread Dave M.
While Leatherique will clean MB Tex just fine, it's mostly a waste of
money. The MB Tex won't absorb any of the pricey Rejuvinator Oil like
real leather does. I would just use a good vinyl cleaner, like
Meguiars or 3M, and then use Formula 303 when the seats are all
cleaned up. I also use 303 on the dash and any other vinyl parts.
Great stuff. I save Leatherique for leather only.

:-)

-Dave M.

 --
 Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 18:35:57 -0500
 From: Tom Scordato [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [MBZ] MB Tex / cold weather
 To: Mercedes Discussion List [EMAIL PROTECTED]


 303 Aerospace Protectant.  Just do not let the bottle and liquid freeze.
 Tom

 - Original Message -
 From: LT Don [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Mercedes Discussion List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Tuesday, December 27, 2005 12:13 PM
 Subject: [MBZ] MB Tex / cold weather


  My driver's seat is looking like it could use some attention. Is there any
  conditioner that can be used in cold weather (~30F)? I seem to remember
  that Leatherique needs warmer temps to work.



Re: [MBZ] Rear suspension link replacement - update

2005-12-28 Thread Dave M.
Aaron,

Wow, I didn't know there were R129 wheels in that size. Very
interesting! It was probably smart to get the late style LCA's, now
you have the option of running whatever brakes you want. It's a shame
the Sportline LCA's are so blasted expensive (~$700 wholesale per
pair, dealer only).

Thanks for the tip on the wheel catalog, I'll try to pick one of those
up. Also thanks for the tip on the Koken tools. I assume they must be
better kwality than the ST stuff, which to date I have not been
impressed with...

:-)

-Dave M.

 --
 Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 16:58:07 -0800
 From: Aaron Lam [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [MBZ] Rear suspension link replacement - update


 Dave, the fronts are the 5-spoke 17x8 ET37 E430 sport wheels, and
 the rears are R129 wheels which look EXACTLY like the fronts but are
 17x8.25 ET34. As for the control arms, I went with the regular
 124-330-35/34-07 ones - late style with the non-removable ball joint.
 They were a LOT cheaper than the Sportline ones, that's for sure!

 On a side note, you should pick up the 2006 Geniune Mercedes-Benz
 Accessories Wheels brochure from your local MB dealer. They have LOTS
 of neat looking wheels with part numbers and all dimensions. The W209,
 R171, and W203 all have a good selection of 17x7.5 ET37 wheels, which
 IMO is the perfect size wheel for a lowered non-500E 124! If you can't
 get ahold of the catalog, I can send one over...

 -Aaron



Re: [MBZ] Is this an OM 612?

2005-12-28 Thread Dave M.
The opening bid for that Sprinter engine ain't bad. But look at the
seller's other items! OMG! How does he sell ANYTHING? His prices for
used parts are almost as high as new. Fifty bucks for a USED battery
tray? That guy is smoking some REALLY good crack.

=:-O

-dm

 --
 Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 21:39:07 -0500
 From: Tjohn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: [MBZ] Is this an OM 612?


 Is this a Sprinter engine?  Seems like a good price if so... I just wish I
 had the funds to make one work in my 126...  I have dreams of increased
 horsepower and mileage.
 http://makeashorterlink.com/?P1FB2206C

 Tjohn
 82 300 SD 220K



Re: [MBZ] Looking to rent differential bushing puller/press tool

2005-12-28 Thread Dave M.
Aaron,

I think PP sells the equivalent SirTools (?) version for $112, PP p/n
58-076. They call it a 'Sub Frame Bushing Tool', but it's for the
differential-to-subframe bushings, not the subframe-to-body bushings
like you'd think. I don't have one, so if you buy it and want to
re-sell it when you're done, I'd be interested. That would almost be
the cost of a rental, lol. Seriously, I don't know if anyone rents
that tool, but you could try PP and Rusty.

PP tool:
http://tinyurl.com/bfves

:-)

-Dave M.

 --
 Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 01:05:55 -0800
 From: Aaron Lam [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: [MBZ] Looking to rent differential bushing puller/press tool


 Hello all,

 Does anyone know where I can rent the puller/press tool to rr the two
 bushings at the rear of the differential where it mounts to the
 subframe? The factory tool from MB (124-589-01-43-00) is around $500!!
 :O

 -Aaron
 1987 300D
 1987 300TD



Re: [MBZ] VERY Nice 124 2.5 on ebay Central Indiana - no affiliation.

2005-12-28 Thread Dave M.
It looks nice, but wow the bid price sure shot up there for a car with
over 200k, no leather, and no ASD. Hmmm. Also, I didn't realize Kumho
tyres were made in Germany! Learn sumthin' new every day. All this
time I thought they were Korean. The car does look nice, though... and
as usual, is too far away from me.

:-)

+dm

 --
 Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 08:56:04 -0600
 From: Donald Snook [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: [MBZ] VERY Nice 124 2.5 on ebay Central Indiana - no
affiliation.

 http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/1-family-owned-non-smoker-24-pix-NICE-TURBO-DIESEL_W0QQitemZ4599776367QQcategoryZ6330QQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem


 Donald H. Snook



Re: [MBZ] SOS - '87 190Dt Overheat!

2005-12-28 Thread Dave M.
Hi Tan,

Well, the good news is, your auxiliary fan switch still works - this
part is often dead after 10+ years (at least it has been on every W124
owned by my family.) That also means your dash gauge is probably
accurate. So you are either not getting coolant flow, or the radiator
is not doing it's job properly. Since the radiator outlet is cold, my
guess is you have a lack of coolant flow? I'd think if the radiator
was bad, it wouldn't happen suddenly, and the outlet would be hot.

You can test the t-stat in a pot of hot water, it should visibly open
fully by ~94°C, before the water is boiling. No pressure is needed to
make the t-stat open. I'd pull the water pump and replace it. I
suspect the impeller could be separated from the shaft - not likely,
but I'm fresh out of other ideas. I'd get a rebuilt pump from the
dealer (or OE from Rusty), that was the most economical option the
last time I checked. Please keep us updated, I'm curious what the root
cause is.

:-)

-Dave M.

 --
 Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 08:45:33 -0800 (PST)
 From: Tan Qu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: [MBZ] SOS - '87 190Dt Overheat!


 Yesterday I noticed our 190Dt started to overheat.
 Outside temp was around 60F's but the coolant temp
 shot up to 120C degrees. The auxillary fans came on
 but the temp still won't come down. Last night I
 inspected the belt drive system, replaced the fan
 clutch with a good used one and also the belt. Rest of
 the belt drive parts are fairly new. Also replaced the
 thermostat with a god used one. But the car still
 overheats. Temp stayed around 118c. The coolant
 overflow tank is clean with no oil trace. The upper
 radiator hose was not pressurized when the car cooled
 down. One thing I noticed was throughout whole time I
 was testing the car the lower radiator hose was cold.
 It seems to me the coolant did not get circulated
 through the radiator at all. I want to suspect the
 thermostat was the culprit but the one I just put in
 was a known good one, actually came off the same car
 when I did preventative maintenance.

 Any possibility that the water pump could be bad (put
 in about 80k miles ago)? What usually happens when the
 water pump goes out? Also how does the thermostat work
 exactly? I understand the the bimetal parts expand at
 the different rate when the coolant temp rises but
 what exactly open the valves? Does the expansion rate
 difference of the bi-metal opens the valve or the
 pressure in the coolant system (applied by the water
 pump) push open the valve?

 Any troubleshooting ideas are greatly appreciated.


 Tan



Re: [MBZ] SOS - '87 190Dt Overheat!

2005-12-28 Thread Dave M.
Shoot - I don't have it either. I'll copy the list:

=)


 On 12/28/05, Joe Knight [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Yuck!  Sounds like you're going to have to drain the cooling system anyway
 so you might want to check the rad for flow with a hose soon as its empty,
 but given the onset of symptoms it does sound most likely to be a water pump
 failure of some sort.

 (hm, don't seem to have Tan's addy so this to you only, Spud)

 j




Re: [MBZ] Nice Unimog for $110k

2005-12-28 Thread Dave M.
Yeah, I noticed that $25k number in the text also. Any idea what the
market value is on this thing? I'm wondering if the misprint is in the
text, and reserve is under $125k. (??) I could see that CDI engine
alone selling for $25k!

=)

+dm

On 12/28/05, Joe Knight [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Looks like a misprint.  (Reserve?) price is said to be under $25K in the
 Vehicle Description.  Apparently there've been some offers; be slightly
 interesting to see what if finally goes for.

 j


 On 12/28/05, Dave M. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Drat, they only have one at that bargain-basement price. And here I
  was hoping for a matched pair. :-( That would definitely one-up the
  Hummer crowd, though. There's a 6-cylinder CDI engine hidden in there
  with 280hp. What a sweet machine!
 
  :-)
 
  -dm
 
   --
   Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 11:45:51 -0500
   From: dave walton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Subject: [MBZ] Nice Unimog for $110k
  
  
   
 http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=4600415563
 



Re: [MBZ] SOS - '87 190Dt Overheat!

2005-12-28 Thread Dave M.
Tan,

I think the new pumps are OK, but I forget. I recall that last time I
checed, the rebuilt pumps from the dealer (or Rusty) were a lot less
than new. Maybe that's no longer true? I generally prefer dealer parts
due to the warranty. I believe the dealer parts you buy through Rusty
also carry the dealer warranty (ask him for details - I'm not sure on
that.) Brian Toscano had done some research on OM60x water pumps, I
think - maybe he can add his $0.02?

Oh, btw - I would still test the t-stat (or install a new dealer
t-stat), and it wouldn't hurt to put a garden  hose in the top of the
radiator and make sure there's good flow. If the flow is normal and
outlet is still cold, to me that once again points to the water pump.
If flow is restricted, the radiator may be the problem (plugged).

:-)

+dm

 --
 Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 09:22:47 -0800 (PST)
 From: Tan Qu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [MBZ] SOS - '87 190Dt Overheat!


 Dave and all,

 I am more leaning toward to a bad water pump. When I
 turned the heater on which in turn turned the
 (electric) auxillary water pump the temp droped maybe
 2 degrees. My feel was that the coolant was plainly
 not flowing throught the system, even the closed
 circuit.

 What's the story on the water pump? I guess the new
 Laso or Geba pumps at Rusty's website are no good?

 Tan



Re: [MBZ] VERY Nice 124 2.5 on ebay Central Indiana - no affiliation.

2005-12-28 Thread Dave M.
Hi Craig,

ASD is a traction control of sorts. Basically, cars with ASD have a
limited-slip differential that has something like 20-40% locking all
the time, via internal clutches in the ring gear carrier. When the
computer senses wheelspin, it engages an external hydraulic system
that locks the diff up 100%, and triggers an orange warning triangle
in the center/top of the speedometer. It's easy to spot cars with ASD,
just look for the little square 'window' in the speedometer. Cars with
ASR (an electronic system without mechanical limited-slip or any
hydraulics) have the same little speedo warning light, but control
traction by reducing engine power and/or applying the rear brake to
the spinning wheel.

Only gas cars have ASR. It was optional on some 1990's cars, standard
on others. I believe it's only on M104/M119/M120 engines but that may
not be an accurate statement. ASR was never offered on diesels.
Diesels have ASD as optional equipment.

The only gas car that ever had ASD were the three different 190E-16's
(but only models shipped outside USA and Japan.) The USA got a
neutered version of the base 201.034 for some reason, and we never saw
the way cool 201.035 or 201.036 (Evolution I and II) make it across
the pond.

The 4Matic has yet a third system which is similar to ASD, complete
with speedo warning light... but MB doesn't say the 4Matic has ASD.
The 4Matics have limited slip front  rear diffs, and I think they
have the hydraulic locking for at least the rear.

Confused yet?

:-)

-Dave M.
 --
 Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 11:21:17 -0700
 From: Craig McCluskey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [MBZ] VERY Nice 124 2.5 on ebay Central Indiana - no
affiliation.

 On Wed, 28 Dec 2005 09:34:05 -0700 Dave M. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  It looks nice, but wow the bid price sure shot up there for a car with
  over 200k, no leather, and no ASD.

 Forgive my ignorance, what is ASD?


 Craig



Re: [MBZ] SOS - '87 190Dt Overheat!

2005-12-29 Thread Dave M.
I think Marshall got the numbers confused. I just checked the
OM602/603 factory  manual, section 20-005. The chart there says that
non-turbo 602 engine t-stats start opening at 85C, and are fully open
by 100C. However the turbo 602 and 603 engine t-stats start opening at
80C, and are fully open at 94C. Either way is somewhat irrelevant, as
both should be fully open by the time a pot of water is boiling, for
test purposes.

:-)

+dm

 --
 Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 13:57:45 -0500
 From: Marshall Booth [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [MBZ] SOS - '87 190Dt Overheat!


 Dave M. wrote:
  Hi Tan,
 

  You can test the t-stat in a pot of hot water, it should visibly open
  fully by ~94?C, before the water is boiling. No pressure is needed to
  make the t-stat open. I'd pull the water pump and replace it. I
  suspect the impeller could be separated from the shaft - not likely,
  but I'm fresh out of other ideas. I'd get a rebuilt pump from the
  dealer (or OE from Rusty), that was the most economical option the
  last time I checked. Please keep us updated, I'm curious what the root
  cause is.


 WRONG. The 603.96  602.96 thermostats start opening at 80 and are fully
 open at 100 deg. C.

 Be SURE there's not a big air bubble (that will cause the exactly what
 you seem to be describing).

 I have never had a bad 60x water pump. I've had 3 bad radiators.

 Marshall



Re: [MBZ] 124 front control arm removal

2005-12-29 Thread Dave M.
Aaron,

I think that's just old-school Mercedes over-engineering. I'd love to
see the car that actually requires the special tool. IIRC, if you jam
a screwdriver into the slot and pry/twist, that should provide enough
separation, in the event a BFH didn't work in the first place. Maybe
this is a bigger problem in the rust belt.

=)

-Dave M.

 --
 Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 17:19:54 -0800
 From: Aaron Lam [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: [MBZ] 124 front control arm removal


 Hi all,

 The FSM mentions the use of a spreader tool to expand the joint in the
 steering knuckle in case it's too tight. Has anyone actually had to
 use this tool to rr the control arms, or will a BFH / prybar do the
 job?

 -Aaron



Re: [MBZ] WTF?

2005-12-29 Thread Dave M.
Sadly, no, he will not get the boot. He's a Power Seller, which means
he can do anything short of selling crack on eBay and get away with
it. See, eBay makes money off these jokers, no matter how badly they
screw their victims (er,I mean customers). That's why Big Buffoon is
still around after years of continuous problems. He consistently gets
eBay to remove a lot, if not most, of his negative feedbacks. Bottom
line, eBay officials are not our friends - they are interested in
making money. Extreme care should be taken with any seller that has a
questionable feedback record.

BTW, this Ideal bozo has a cheaper scolding here - save 90% over his other rant:

http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=8025646444

I wonder if he has any idea how much those listings are costing him!


-Dave M.


 --
 Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 23:08:15 -0500
 From: Steve MacSween [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [MBZ] WTF?


 Well actually that listing violates eBay rules by a mile. If someone
 complains he will get the boot.

 Mac



Re: [MBZ] SOS - '87 190Dt Overheat! -update

2005-12-29 Thread Dave M.
Tan,

Refresh my memory. Did the problem happen overnight, meaning the car
has been running at 100C for a while and suddenly popped to 120C? Or
has it gradually been climbing from 100C to 120C over the past
months/years? If it was an overnight thing, I'd lean towards the water
pump as suspect - or at least worth a closer look. You can always
re-install it if the impeller is properly attached and intact.

If the problem has been slowly getting worse, with temps higher every
few months, I would *strongly* suspect the radiator is bad (corroded
internally). It may flow just fine, but be unable to transfer heat
properly. This assumes the fins are all clean in the condenser AND
radiator.

The bubble theory mostly applies to when the cooling system is first
filled. If you've been driving the car for months, a bubble should NOT
just suddenly appear out of nowhere.

:-)

-Dave M.

 --
 Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 07:22:51 -0800 (PST)
 From: Tan Qu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [MBZ] SOS - '87 190Dt Overheat! -update

 I am pretty positive on the first two but not last
 one. The thermostat on OM602 only goes in one
 position. There is a tab in the thermostat housing
 that sits in a small recess on the thermostat. Put it
 in other ways the housing would not close properly. I
 missed it when I put the second thermostat in and
 found that out when I started to fill the rediator
 from the upper hose. The coolant came out right there.
 So that should tell me the radiator flows ok, right?
 On the 190Dt it is hard to get the hose clamp for the
 upper hose end on radiator so I detached from the
 engine end and filled radiator from there. It is
 possible there may be an air bubble trapped in the
 head. How do you normally purge the air in the head -
 by filling the engine from the upper hose?


 Tan

 --- Jim Cathey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

   Did the boil test last night, the thermostat I
  just
   took off the car opened nicely near the boiling
  point.
   Fully opened when the water was boiling. Also
  checked
   the upper hose again, no pressurized syndrome. So
  I
   guess new pump is the next course of action. I
  still
   have a Laso pump on hand. Would you all think
  dealer
   parts is superior than the OEM parts on this one?
 
  I think the pump you have ready to put in is the
  superior one, but only because I'm still not
  convinced
  that it will make any difference and using it will
  allow
  you to conduct the test immediately.  You're _sure_
  the
  radiator flows well, the thermostat is in the right
  way around, and that there's no huge air bubble
  trapped
  in the head?
 
  -- Jim



Re: [MBZ] SOS - '87 190Dt Overheat!

2005-12-29 Thread Dave M.
Fascinating. This isn't the first time I've found conflicting
information in different publications. In summary:

TheTDM says turbo is 80-100, while non-turbo is 85-94.

The FSM says turbo is 80-94, while non-turbo is 85-100.

The CD-ROM is vague but implies 85-100 for both.

The EPC only shows opening temps, and says turbo is 80C, while
non-turbo is 85C (not the same part number).


:-)

-Dave M.

 --
 Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 11:48:00 -0500
 From: Marshall Booth [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [MBZ] SOS - '87 190Dt Overheat!


 Dave M. wrote:
  I think Marshall got the numbers confused. I just checked the
  OM602/603 factory  manual, section 20-005. The chart there says that
  non-turbo 602 engine t-stats start opening at 85C, and are fully open
  by 100C. However the turbo 602 and 603 engine t-stats start opening at
  80C, and are fully open at 94C. Either way is somewhat irrelevant, as
  both should be fully open by the time a pot of water is boiling, for
  test purposes.

 TDM 1985 (p 231) shows OM60x.91/92 nonturbo engines use a thermostat
 that starts opening at 85 and is full open at 94. The 1988 TDM (p 304)
 also shows OM60x.91/92 nonturbo engines use a thermostat that starts
 opening at 85 and is full open at 94 and the OM60x.96 turbo engines use
 a thermostat that starts opening at 80 and is fully open at 100 deg. C.

 The descriptions in section 20-005 of the engine manual are for
 illustration only and imply that both turbo and non turbo engines use
 the same thermostat - but they don't.

 Check the part numbers for turbo and non-turbo 60x engines.

 Marshall



Re: [MBZ] Mercedes Digest, Vol 1, Issue 25

2005-12-29 Thread Dave M.
Tan,

The OM60x cars just seem to plug up radiators for some reason. I don't
understand why. If you have not done so, replace the plastic coolant
tank (the one with the radiator cap) with a new one. The originals
don't have the silica pack inside, the new ones do. This helps control
deposits  corrosion, according to the FSM. More details are here:

http://www.w124performance.com/docs/mb/OM60X/OM603_radiator_notes.pdf

http://www.w124performance.com/docs/mb/OM60X/OM603_high_temps.pdf

:-)

-Dave M.

 --
 Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 11:13:23 -0800 (PST)
 From: Tan Qu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [MBZ] SOS - '87 190Dt Overheat! -update

 Jim,

 If my radiator/engine internal indeed are clogged up
 I'd really go nuts - I have beening flushing/refilling
 with MB coolant just about once a year!

 Tan



Re: [MBZ] WOW, this guy has bad feedback

2005-12-30 Thread Dave M.
Whaddya mean? He's ranked fourth on all of eBay, with over 510,000
positive feedbacks! Half a million people can't all be wrong. He just
got a bad rap over a few (thousand) negatives along the way. We should
probably feel sorry for him, poor guy.

Want a chuckle? Read the description of his MB piston for sale:

http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=7575498611

This is a perfect example of eBay allowing someone with an abominable
feedback record to continue selling, due to their high volume of sales
and therefore large revenue source for eBay.

O_o

-dm

 --
 Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 22:45:26 -0600
 From: Kaleb C. Striplin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: [MBZ] WOW, this guy has bad feedback


 http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=8026449881



Re: [MBZ] WTF?

2005-12-30 Thread Dave M.
Then I'm a sleazebag too. :) I finally stopped leaving feedback (when
I'm selling something) until the buyer leaves positive feedback for
me. I tell them right up front to leave feedback for me if they're
happy, and email me immediately if they're not so we can work out a
resolution. Half the time I get no feedback at all, and I'm sure not
going to pad their positives while they give me nothing!

As a buyer, I leave feedback immediately if it's positive, and I don't
bother leaving negatives or neutrals - not worth the risk of losing my
100% positive record for some retaliatory scumbag. I'd attempt the
'feedback snipe' but eBay can't even commit to a firm 90 day limit, so
the scumbag may still be able to retaliate even if you time it to
89.99 days.

+dm

 --
 Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 22:40:37 -0600
 From: Kaleb C. Striplin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [MBZ] WTF?


 I dont leave feedback till its left for me, does that make me a sleezebag?



Re: [MBZ] WTF?

2005-12-30 Thread Dave M.
True, eBay isn't making much... but the listing fees (regardless of if
the item sells) are based on opening bid price. He'd same some $$ if
the opening bid was $0.99 instead of $600. It makes no sense to me for
him to list more than one, with a useless title, at a high price. Very
weird.

=)

 --
 Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 20:21:29 -0500
 From: Lee Levitt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [MBZ] WTF?


 Hey, when he has a listing for something that doesn't exist, so that people
 know to contact him directly, Ebay is not making very much on the listing...

 Lee



Re: [MBZ] Rebuilt Odometers/Speedometers

2006-01-03 Thread Dave M.
If it's just a simple busted gear, yeah, fix it yourself. Otherwise it
may need the attention of a professional. My 1987 300D speedo trip
odometer was acting up for a long time and finally died - after
resetting it would 'click' at 0.9 miles, and not roll forward.
Continual resetting over many miles might, eventually, get it counting
properly again. I sent it to Overseas Speedo for repair, and it came
back doing the same thing. I sent it back a second time, they spent
more time on it, but it still does the same thing! I gave up, got it
working (after a bazillion reset cycles), and just don't touch the
reset button anymore. I'm toying with the idea of changing my rear
axle ratio anyway, which would require a new/different speedo, and I
figure at that point I'll get one that WORKS. Otherwise I may send it
in to a different VDO repair shop and see if they have better luck
fixing whatever the problem is.

YMMV, etc...

:)

-Dave M.

 --
 Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2006 20:02:03 -0600
 From: Nick Wellinghoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [MBZ] Rebuilt Odometers/Speedometers

 If you just need to rebuild your odo don't waste your money sending it
 someone who is just going to replace the one little plastic gear in there
 that breaks over time.  I bought the gear for 5 bucks and replaced it
 myself. Total time, 30 min.

 N




[MBZ] Nice little VeeDub

2006-01-03 Thread Dave M.
I thought it was a bit much to compare a purpose-built race car with
stock exotics, but it's still pretty cool...

http://www.lookatentertainment.com/v/v-1172.htm

=)

--
Dave M.
Boise, ID
1994 E500 - 95kmi  (Q-ship)
1987 300D - 261kmi (Sportline)



[MBZ] The Atom

2006-01-03 Thread Dave M.
Driving nirvana? Well I'd sure like to give it a try...

http://www.lookatentertainment.com/v/v-1866.htm

I think a different bike with a pro rider would have equaled the lap
time, if not beat it. The CBR600RR is not the quickest production bike
out there, and I'm not talking about exotics either. Oh btw, note the
Atom was only topped by the Enzo - wow. Wonder if it's street legal in
the USA.

=)

--
Dave M.
Boise, ID
1994 E500 - 95kmi  (Q-ship)
1987 300D - 261kmi (Sportline)



Re: [MBZ] 124 leaking wndshld

2006-01-04 Thread Dave M.
Wilton,

I have had this problem for years, but it only drips in major
rainstorms, and usually only when there's serious wind blowing too. I
was never able to figure out exactly where it was coming from. My
windshield needs replacement before springtime, so hopefully if that's
done properly it will cure the problem. I'm hoping the leak is not
from elsewhere, such as the sunroof or roof trim areas, as then I'd
need to locate the problem and fix it. Please let us know what you
find with your car.

:-)

-Dave M.

 --
 Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2006 10:36:54 -0500
 From: wilton strickland [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: [MBZ] 124 leaking wndshld

 Wndshld on my otherwise showroom 87 300D has slow-drip leak at upper lft
 corner. PO had new wndshld installed abt June 04.  Tips on sealing the leak?

 Wilton
 87 300D 95KMI



[MBZ] Pimped 190E

2006-01-04 Thread Dave M.
This is wrong on s many levels...

http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=4599940334

Look closely - it's got hydraulics too. (*shudder*)


O_o

--
Dave M.
Boise, ID
1994 E500 - 95kmi  (Q-ship)
1987 300D - 261kmi (Sportline)



Re: [MBZ] 140 3.5 fuel mileage

2006-01-05 Thread Dave M.
No, at least not in the USA they didn't. All the W140.134 models from
1992-95 in the USA have the same 4-speed 722.3 transmission. It was
the gassers, after 1995 I think, that got the new, beefy 722.6
five-speed auto in the USA.

The lucky folks across the pond got the W140.135, which had both the
OM606 turbo motor (which we NEVER saw), and that engine was mated with
the same 722.6 five-speed auto. Now THAT would be one heckuva car!!
What a shame MB never imported them. I bet they'd have the highest
resale value of any W140 chassis.

:)

+dm

 --
 Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2006 04:00:32 -0500
 From: Jeff Zedic [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [MBZ] 140 3.5 fuel mileage

 Yes something did change...the later ones got the 5 speed auto box!

 Jeff Zedic
 Toronto




Re: [MBZ] 140 3.5 fuel mileage

2006-01-05 Thread Dave M.
Yes, but the S320 had a *different* 5-speed tranny, the 722.5, which
is sort of a 722.3 with a tacked-on 0.75 overdrive fifth gear. This
tranny was too weak to take the torque of either the diesel or V8
engines, so it was only used behind the 6-cyl engines like the M104.
The 722.5 doesn't have a very good reputation for reliability. The
early W140 diesel  V8's got the bulletproof 722.3 four speed, and the
later ones got the much stronger 722.6 five speed.

I'd *love* to swap the 722.6 tranny into my E500, but besides
clearance issues in the body tunnel, there are a lot of electronic
controls that wouldn't play nice with the old W124 computers.

:)

+dm

 --
 Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2006 09:45:09 -0600
 From: Kaleb C. Striplin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [MBZ] 140 3.5 fuel mileage


 Well the 300SE/S320 had the 5 speed from the beginning.

 Dave M. wrote:

  No, at least not in the USA they didn't. All the W140.134 models from
  1992-95 in the USA have the same 4-speed 722.3 transmission. It was
  the gassers, after 1995 I think, that got the new, beefy 722.6
  five-speed auto in the USA.
 
  The lucky folks across the pond got the W140.135, which had both the
  OM606 turbo motor (which we NEVER saw), and that engine was mated with
  the same 722.6 five-speed auto. Now THAT would be one heckuva car!!
  What a shame MB never imported them. I bet they'd have the highest
  resale value of any W140 chassis.
 
  :)
 
  +dm



Re: [MBZ] Center A/C Vents (W123)

2006-01-05 Thread Dave M.
I missed this thread earlier. I posted my writeup on how to replace
the W123 center vent vacuum pod on Rusty's forum. Click this link for
the full how-to procedure, including the part numbers to order:

http://buymbparts.com/forum/showthread.php?t=606

:)

-Dave M.

 --
 Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2006 15:21:56 -0500
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [MBZ] Center A/C Vents


 Thanks to Lee and Alan (and others) who shared the tricky procedure to
 replace the pods behind the dash.  I plan to check the lines before
 attempting to get at the pods in hopes of finding a leak in the line before
 working on the pods.

 My wife has small hands - so I hope to enlist her help if we have to work
 behind the dash --

 Thanks again -
 Sincerely,
 Larry T ('78 240D - 286k)



Re: [MBZ] anybody with a 603 3.5?

2006-01-08 Thread Dave M.
Kaleb,

I would get the diesel. If you can find one with a documented factory
crate motor, great - they are out there, just not easy to locate.
Otherwise, get one that runs good and doesn't use oil. Tear the engine
down and replace the rods BEFORE they bend and destroy the cylinder
walls. Yeah, it will cost you $1k for new rods up front (plus gaskets
and labor time), but the engine should last as long as any other 603
diesel afterwards - assuming the cylinders are still nice and round.
The other advantage is, since you have to disassemble most of the
engine anyway, you can replace ALL external seals and get a 100%
leak-free motor.

If you go for the gasser, the 500 is the only one to consider. The 320
is too gutless, and why bother with the 420 when the 500 will be
identical in maintenance cost (same M119 engine) but offer an extra 40
ponies on demand, with very little loss in MPG. Forget the 600 for
obvious reasons. My sister picked up a very nice 1994 S500 recently
and they really like it. Fuel economy is rather poor, figure 13-15
around town (depending on the weight of your foot), and 18-22 on the
freeway. Later cars (1996-up?) got the M119.98x engine with
distributorless ignition (very cool), as well as the 5-speed automatic
tranny. The S500 is surprisingly quick for such a large car. If you
lack restraint, a Valentine-1 is a wise accessory to purchase. (Trust
me.)

Some day I wouldn't mind getting a W140 myself, and it would either be
the S350 (with an intercooler, and the full-load screw tweaked,
buwaaa-hah-hahaha!) or the S500. Such a shame we never got the 180hp
S300 with the turbo 606 motor over here. I'd be all over one of those!

:-)

-Dave M.

 --
 Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2006 08:46:52 -0600
 From: Kaleb C. Striplin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: [MBZ] anybody with a 603 3.5?

 How many folks here have a 3.5 in a 140, well, or a 126?  Bent rods?
 Thinking about looking for another 140 in the near future and am really
 concidering a 3.5 and risking the rods bending.  If not that I would
 either go with the next economical choice of a 320 with the 104 or most
 likely all out with a 500.  Anybody got a 500 and if so what sort of
 mileage do you get?  Probably better off going this route over the
 diesel anyways.
 --
 Kaleb C. Striplin/Claremore, OK



Re: [MBZ] anybody with a 603 3.5?

2006-01-08 Thread Dave M.
My personal opinion is not *if* an original 3.5 will bend the rods,
but *when*. Also remember that most owners think adding a quart of oil
every 1kmi is perfectly normal. For a high-mileage M103, it is... but
NOT on an OM603. But hey, if you get an S350 cheap enough, just drive
it until the engine is shot and then fork over the $$$ for a crate
motor. Or, consider swapping in a cheap/used 3.0L long block.
(Intercooled, of course. Heh-heh.)

=)

+dm™  (intercoolers on the brain today)

 --
 Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2006 10:29:57 -0600
 From: Kaleb C. Striplin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [MBZ] anybody with a 603 3.5?


 got plenty of 126's, had a 140 before, thinking about one again.  I have
 seen several on ebay lately with 200-250K miles.  Surely those are OK by
 now.



Re: [MBZ] anybody with a 603 3.5?

2006-01-08 Thread Dave M.
If operating costs are not a big deal, then yeah go with the gasser.
But remember the gasser (S500) will bet getting about 14mpg around
town, compared with probably 24mpg on the diesel (S350). That's a BIG
difference in the wallet if you drive a lot of miles, even after
adjusting for the fact that D#2 is a few pennies more than premium
petrol in most places. I don't think the S420 or S320 will offer much,
if any, benefit in around-town economy. They'd probably be a little
better on the freeway though. Even at 16mpg, the diesel is still FIFTY
PERCENT more efficient. YMMV, etc...

=)

Dave M.
Boise, ID
1994 E500 (5.0L M119.974)
1987 300D (3.0L OM603.960)



 --
 Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2006 13:16:27 -0600
 From: Kaleb C. Striplin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [MBZ] anybody with a 603 3.5?


 Im sure gas would be the choice anyways since she doesnt like diesel



[MBZ] Importing non-US car to the USA? (was: rodbender)

2006-01-09 Thread Dave M.
Craig,

Importing a car to the USA that was never originally sold here just
about takes an act of Congress, or some sort of diplomatic powers.
Usually it requires making the whole car meet DOT regs, which can be
obscenely expensive. There are a few loopholes, but I think those are
few and far between. For instance, if you are moving from another
country to the USA permanently and want to bring your personal car
over, I think that's possible. (??) Not many people would fall into
that category, though.

Believe me, I'd LOVE to find a way to get a W124 E60 AMG Limited
across the pond, but it'd probably easier to import all the parts
needed to build the car and then assemble it here - same with the
W140.135 that has the 606 turbo motor. Stupid import laws! I wonder if
that car was sold in Canada? It's marginally easier to get a Canadian
car to the USA - I think. (???)

+dm

 --
 Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2006 15:29:53 -0700
 From: Craig McCluskey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [MBZ] anybody with a 603 3.5?

  Such a shame we never got the 180hp S300 with the turbo 606 motor over
  here. I'd be all over one of those!

 Any chance of importing one from wherever they were sold?


 Craig



Re: [MBZ] Fuel pressure test kits for K-jetronic(CIS)

2006-01-09 Thread Dave M.
Is this the same as the CIS-E system used on the early M103 engines?
1986 through 1990-something 300E? I've been wanting to  get that too,
since my 300E has some annoying issues that I haven't been able to
resolve (hard to start when warm, misfire at idle when warm). How
about these kits:

http://www.thetoolwarehouse.net/shop/TA-33865.html

http://www.thetoolwarehouse.net/shop/OTC-6552.html

:-)

-Dave M.

 --
 Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2006 22:19:23 -0500
 From: Mitch Haley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [MBZ] Fuel pressure test kits for K-jetronic(CIS)


 Hendrik Riessen wrote:
 
  Yeah well I am in the market for a test kit.
  The cheapest I have found in Oz is about AU$600
  http://www.autotools.com.au/catalogue/product.php/10/19/224

 That's a big universal kit. For K-jet, you just need something
 you can put in the control circuit with a gauge and a shutoff
 valve. With the valve open, you read control pressure. With
 the valve shut, control pressure rises to match system pressure
 and you see what the regulator is set for.



Re: [MBZ] Cracked diesel head on 124 series

2006-01-10 Thread Dave M.
Hi Dennis,

Go to this link, skip down to #16:

http://www.w124performance.com/docs/mb/articles/124.1x3_buying_tips.txt

:-)

-Dave M.

 --
 Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 21:12:38 -0800
 From: Woodlandtaylors [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: [MBZ] Cracked diesel head on 124 series

 Can someone provide me a link that discusses the cylinder head cracking
 issue as it relates to the casting # and exactly where to view the casting
 marks?



 Dennis T



Re: [MBZ] Cracked diesel head on 124 series

2006-01-10 Thread Dave M.
Yeah, wow, I'll second that. Don't suppose she's single, eh? ;-)

Seriously though, the 'low power' issue is probably either an ALDA
adjustment, or a plugged line between the intake and ALDA. When
running properly, this is not a slow car. A full buyer's guide to this
model is here:

http://www.w124performance.com/docs/mb/articles/124.1x3_buying_tips.txt

:-)

-Dave M.

 --
 Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 11:52:08 -0600
 From: Kaleb C. Striplin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [MBZ] Cracked diesel head on 124 series

 WOW, thats some daughter you got there.

 Woodlandtaylors wrote:

  Don,
 
  Thanks, the 1987 Wagon that was on Craiglist in Portland Oregon for $1895
  the other day is available again. The purchaser reports he changed the glow
  plugs and it starts instantly now. He purchased it for his girlfriend to use
  for her real estate business but she does not like it. Hates diesel and says
  it does not accelerate satisfactory for her and would rather have a MLxxx.
 
  He asked for his money back, which the original owner said no way a deals a
  deal - but did give him a list of people that had contacted him. I was first
  on the list; my daughter who drives a 300CD would like to get the wagon so
  I'm going to look at it this morning. I'm a little 'gun shy' after what has
  transpired but it is worth the time to look. Its needs some work but the
  daughter wants to tackle it, she changes the oil in the 300CD herself and
  replaced the turbo - I figure if she can do that she can tackle anything.
 
  If it does not suit her perhaps someone on the list may be interested.
 
  Sorry for the saga,
 
  Dennis T



Re: [MBZ] 124 parts

2006-01-10 Thread Dave M.
Hi Sunil,

1) Should be pretty easy. Any hood from 1986-1993 in Smoke Silver will
work, although the color may be slightly off . I'd try to find one
locally, as shipping a hood is both expensive and risky (hard to avoid
damage in transit). I've got a spare trunk lid in Smoke Silver, but no
hood, sorry.

2) The seat back will be harder to find used - most places will want
to sell you a whole seat. Might consider buying a pair of late model
leather seats as an upgrade, but otherwise just buy a new Tex backrest
from Rusty.

:)

-dm

 --
 Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 12:28:57 -0800
 From: Sunil Hari [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: [MBZ] 124 parts


 I'm seriously considering buying that 1992 300D with 280Kmi on it (the
 two-owner one, smoke silver, complete records and completely rebuilt).  Two
 questions before I part with my cash:

 1)  How easily can I get a smoke silver hood for a 124 car?  And how much
 will one cost me?  Anyone out there -happen- to have an extra one?

 2)  There's a tear in the MB-Tex.  Is this repairable?  If not, how much
 would a new one cost?  Also, does anyone have the backrest portion of MB-Tex
 for a driver's 124 seat (beige)?

 Thanks!
 --
 Sunil Hari
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 513-205-7474



Re: [MBZ] Here comes an oil thread

2006-01-10 Thread Dave M.
Hi Don,

1) Yes.

2) You betcha.

3) 5W-40 first choice, 15W-50 second choice, nothing else.

4) Uh - the answer to that is 'Mobil-1'.

The 5W-40 is very similar to Delvac-1, and I believe both it and the
15W-50 have friction modifiers. Both would be fine for most motocycles
with wet clutches, and I have used various M-1 weights in my bikes.
However, for motorcycle use there is a special formula of Mobil-1 in
various weights, that is designed for the MUCH different shearing
loads seen in motorcycles, since the engine oil also lubes the
sequential gearbox and clutch. In a nutshell, if the 'car' M-1 makes
your bike act funny, use the 'bike' M-1. Most bikes aren't that picky
though, despite some people's claim to the contrary. FWIW, my 300E
uses about a quart every 1500 miles or less. I fill with M-1 5W-40,
then when it needs oil, I top up with 30W dino. By the time it's due
for a change, I probably still have more than half M-1 in the
crankcase. Maybe I'll try new valve seals in that engine and see if it
helps...

:)

-Dave M.

 --
 Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 16:22:50 -0600
 From: Donald Snook [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: [MBZ] Here comes an oil thread -- Sorry in advance it is a
new topic though its about a gasser

 Okay, I am fully aware of the great level of debate regarding oil
 brands.  Dr. Booth had me convinced to switch and was going to but then
 I sold the diesel.  So, here's my question.  Is Mobil 1 worth it in a
 gas engine.  I know that Mobil 1 is excellent at keeping soot in
 suspension and lasts longer without breakdown in the harsh environment
 of a diesel engine, but I have a few questions for my new (to me)
 purchase 1990 300SEL 122k miles.



 1.   Should I use Mobil 1?

 2.   Does it offer the benefits that it does for diesels?

 3.   What weight should I use?



 These engines have some issues with valve seals after high mileage.
 This car does not use/burn any oil in 3000 miles. Which makes me think
 two things, it will eventually need the seals or it may have already had
 them done. The original owner (bought it new sold it in 2003) had an
 extended warranty and evidently had a lot of work done, so it is
 possible it was already done. It had 76,000 when it was sold in 2003.
 Is there any oil or additive, or snake oil that can prolong that I can
 add or use to prolong the life of the valve seals?



Re: [MBZ] 603 #17 head on ebay no affiliation

2006-01-11 Thread Dave M.
Nah, the wrong category won't affect it much at all. All the serious
eBayers use the search function. Unless the auction title is either
really bad, or has misspelled words, most people will still find it.
You can set up automatic searches on eBay for somewhat rare items like
this, where eBay will email you when something is listed. I used to
have that set up for 603 heads, but stopped after my white car got
totalled... I bet this ends up in the $1k range though.

Side note - looks like it has vertical prechambers, based on the lock
ring style. Probably came off a 1986/87 engine, where it had already
replaced a cracked #14.

:)

+dm™

 --
 Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 23:45:41 -0500
 From: Tjohn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [MBZ] 603 #17 head on ebay no affiliation

 I'm not so sure.  This thing is mis-listed under the instrument clusters
 section and may cut down on the views.  I tried to post this auction this
 morning, but it didn't go thru.  It's had about a hundred views today.

 Tjohn
 82 300 SD 225K


[MBZ] A/C evaporator cleaners?

2006-01-11 Thread Dave M.
Hi all,

I need to pull the dash to replace the vac pods on my 124, and figure
I might as well clean the evaporator while I have easy access to it.
There are foaming cleaners that are supposed to lift off the dirt 
crud and rinse them away, down the drain tubes. I'm having a hard time
finding vendors for this stuff, though. This is the only one I've
located so far:

http://www.ackits.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=dwd2

Is this what I want to buy, or does someone else know of a better
product and/or vendor? Note there are two different items here - the
DWD2 product, and the cheaper 'core treatment' can that's displayed,
and the prices are very different ($40 vs. $15). Rusty, do you sell
stuff like this? Any info would be appreciated.

Thanks!

:-)

--
Dave M.
Boise, ID
1994 E500 - 95kmi  (Q-ship)
1987 300D - 261kmi (Sportline)



[MBZ] New vehicle for women

2006-01-12 Thread Dave M.
Very cool - check out the video (1.6MB download):

http://s27.yousendit.com/d.aspx?id=2FYVNWYSBSNWV180Z4ZNUQKMSW

Of course, the obvious problem here is the nice lady losing her car
(or truck) in her purse, or accidentally opening it at the wrong time
(like in the bathroom). I know Kaleb would love the technology, though
- he could fit thousands of parts cars on a shelf!

=)

--
Dave M.
Boise, ID
1994 E500 - 95kmi  (Q-ship)
1987 300D - 261kmi (Sportline)



Re: [MBZ] 124 rear speaker

2006-01-12 Thread Dave M.
Hi Wilton,

The rear speaker covers are a real nuisance. There are a couple of
clips plus some plastic 'hooks' that will break if you pry in the
wrong area. And, they're even more fun to get properly re-installed. I
hate touching them. I forget exactly which section you need to pry on,
but I think it's the part closer to the center and/or front of the
car.

Also check out the section of the factory manual, job 82-7836.

:)

-Dave M.

 --
 Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 09:31:55 -0500
 From: wilton strickland [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: [MBZ] 124 rear speaker


 Again:  How are rear speaker grilles in 87 300D/124 secured to hat shelf?
 'Want to
 remove one temporarily to run charging cable to mobility scooter in trunk.
 need abt 5/8 inch hole into trunk to insert plug on end of wire, then
 close the hole back around wire.  Can speaker grille be pried out (friction
 fit/springs), or does it have screws, etc?  BTW, I know how to remove rear
 seat and backrest -- just unable any more.

  Wilton



Re: [MBZ] Coked up intake

2006-01-13 Thread Dave M.
No no no, the 606 is still indirect injection with prechambers, same
as the older diesels. The difference is that it's a hemispherical
combustion chamber, with the injector in middle of 4 valves. The
prechamber and injector are buried deep in the middle of the cylinder
head, not outside like the older cars. And the glow plugs are super
long to be able to reach in that far.

We didn't get a real direct-injection engine from MB in the USA until 2005.

+dm

 --
 Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 18:16:19 -0600
 From: Kaleb C. Striplin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [MBZ] Coked up intake

 the 606 is direct injection?  I didnt know that.



Re: [MBZ] Power Steering pump failure.

2006-01-13 Thread Dave M.
For older p/s pumps, roughly up to the mid-80's and/or with V-belt
drive, some form of approved ATF is fine; with Mobil-1 probably being
the preferred ATF. For newer pumps, I'm kind of changing my thinking
back to Constantine's, especially on any car with the expensive
dual-converter pump (most with SLS have this). The MB fluid might even
be synthetic, for all we know - I haven't investigated that, but I
know it's a little spendy at $7-$8 per bottle wholesale.

Now, for the SLS fluid (which goes to a different section of the same
pump), you can NOT use ATF. That definitely requires special hydraulic
fluid. Not a lot of cars have SLS, though - wagons, and a handful of
later sedans, but that's about it. I guess it wasn't a very popular
option for some reason.

:)

-dm

 --
 Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 21:33:34 -0500
 From: Werner Fehlauer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [MBZ] Power Steering pump failure.

 Constantine - I'll take the bait and argue your supposition that there is
 some kind of magic engineering in Mercedes-Benz PS pumps that require
 special snake oil.
 My '90 D has now gone for over 130,000 miles on ATF (put in by a major
 dealer originally, and subsequently changed by me every 30k with Mobil1
 synthetic).  No leaks, and no problems.  I've also changed out the PS oil in
 my daughter's '77 300D, my '84SD, and my '83SD.  All work just fine.  And
 I'll live with the superior cold flow characteristics and high temperature
 compatibility of Mobil1 any day over whatever dino oil they were thinking of
 many years ago in Stuttgart. Sorry, but I just won't buy the argument that
 some old Mercedes spec has to be followed, perhaps just because their
 engineers either hadn't heard of Synthetic ATF or they hadn't personally
 tested it first.
 And Mobil1 will NOT cause O-rings and seals that normally are exposed to an
 oil, to swell and leak as some urban legend will opine.

 Werner


 - Original Message -
 From: Constantine N. Polites [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2006 4:16 PM
 Subject: [MBZ] Power Steering pump failure.


 I just finished rebuilding my tandem pump. I sent part of the work out
  because I didn't have the right puller.
  The Vickers pumps made for MB require a special hydraulic oil.  If you
  use ATF fluid, eventually there will be
  a failure both internally and externally.  Internally, the O rings
  will swell and restrict flow. Externally, the main seal
  will deteriorate and you will have a leak.  That leak will also keep the
  main bearing from being properly lubricated
  and again you will have a mechanical failure. I'd look first of all at
  the tiny O rings.  If they are swollen replace them.
 
  Even though I did use the proper hydraulic oil, apparently the PO
  didn't.  So I experienced the above conditions.
 
  This may have nothing to do with your conditions but it may help.
 
  Regards,
  Constantine



[MBZ] Evaporator cleaning - update

2006-01-16 Thread Dave M.
Hi all,

I posted a few days ago, asking for recommendations for A/C evaporator
cleaners. I was looking for one of those foaming aerosol products
that's supposed to lift crud off the fins, and rinse it down the drain
tubes. I found a couple of rather pricey options on the internet
($15-$40 per can), but was hoping to locate something local so I could
get it done sooner. On Friday, I called a number of major McParts
places, HVAC suppliers, and Auto A/C specialty shops. NOBODY had
anything, and most had no idea what I was talking about, let alone
heard of any specific products like this. Most were surprised when I
told them that I had found several on the internet and just wanted a
local supply! Quite a disappointing venture, at the outset.

One local wholesale HVAC supplier had something that sounded
promising, but when I looked up the product name with Google and got a
data sheet, it clearly stated not for use on evaporators -
apparently it doesn't play nice with bare aluminum! (It's designed for
condenser coils, outdoor industrial stuff.) I decided to stop by this
place anyway, to pick up a can of the condenser coil cleaning stuff
for my home A/C unit this spring. Lo and behold, when I walked in,
there on the shelf, five feet inside the front door, was this gem:

http://tinyurl.com/cdddo
(Nu-Calgon Evap Foam, for those too lazy to click)

At a whopping $7.50 per can, I grabbed four cans, along with the
gallon jug of condenser cleaner. The guy who rang up the sale had to
figure out where it was in the computer, he didn't even know they had
this stuff on the shelf! Go figure. Although the can doesn't include a
fancy long flexible tube like the spendy stuff, it will spray in any
position, including upside down  sideways, which is good because
that's necessary for full cleaning on the W124.

First I replaced my rotted foam drain tubes, to keep the rinse out of
the passenger compartment. Then with the A/C fan removed, I plastered
every visible section of the evaporator with the Evap Foam. I let it
'break down' for about 5 minutes, then repeated the treatment twice
more. I used compressed air to blow the foam further into the
evaporator and applied it one last time, then used a garden sprayer
with water to rinse the evaporator clean (the water drains out the
tubes under the car). The evaporator looks much cleaner now, and
hopefully will work better in the summer heat.

On a side note, I found this rant about a BG evap cleaning product,
which looks an like a repackged DWD2 product with the BG name on it:

http://www.badnissaninfiniticars.com/frigi.htm

Even if it does work as described, I agree with the author of that
page - it's false marketing to show what looks like before and
after photos when they are really old, used and new, never
installed. Check out the video linked there as well. Here's the DWD2
website again, for reference:

http://www.dwd2.com/

And, this is the site selling DWD2 a little cheaper than above:
http://www.ackits.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=dwd2

Anyway, if you can find the Nu-Calgon product locally at a decent
price, I think it's worth a try if your evaporator could use a little
TLC. It's available on the internet (try eBay and Google) if you can't
find it locally. I can't say I'd spring for the $25-$50 (with SH)
that it would cost to buy the other products available. YMMV, etc...

:-)

Best regards,

--
Dave M.
Boise, ID
1994 E500 - 95kmi  (Q-ship)
1987 300D - 261kmi (Sportline)



Re: [MBZ] Evaporator cleaning - update

2006-01-16 Thread Dave M.
Crap. My note below in parenthesis messed up the link. This one works:

http://tinyurl.com/cdddo

Thanks for the heads-up, Joe!

:)

+dm

On 1/15/06, Joe Knight [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Your tinyurl wouldn't work for me, but a little googling did.  Glad to hear
 you found something locally.

 j


 On 1/15/06, Dave M. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Hi all,
 
  I posted a few days ago, asking for recommendations for A/C evaporator
  cleaners. I was looking for one of those foaming aerosol products
  that's supposed to lift crud off the fins, and rinse it down the drain
  tubes. I found a couple of rather pricey options on the internet
  ($15-$40 per can), but was hoping to locate something local so I could
  get it done sooner. On Friday, I called a number of major McParts
  places, HVAC suppliers, and Auto A/C specialty shops. NOBODY had
  anything, and most had no idea what I was talking about, let alone
  heard of any specific products like this. Most were surprised when I
  told them that I had found several on the internet and just wanted a
  local supply! Quite a disappointing venture, at the outset.
 
  One local wholesale HVAC supplier had something that sounded
  promising, but when I looked up the product name with Google and got a
  data sheet, it clearly stated not for use on evaporators -
  apparently it doesn't play nice with bare aluminum! (It's designed for
  condenser coils, outdoor industrial stuff.) I decided to stop by this
  place anyway, to pick up a can of the condenser coil cleaning stuff
  for my home A/C unit this spring. Lo and behold, when I walked in,
  there on the shelf, five feet inside the front door, was this gem:
 
  http://tinyurl.com/cdddo
  (Nu-Calgon Evap Foam, for those too lazy to click)
 
  At a whopping $7.50 per can, I grabbed four cans, along with the
  gallon jug of condenser cleaner. The guy who rang up the sale had to
  figure out where it was in the computer, he didn't even know they had
  this stuff on the shelf! Go figure. Although the can doesn't include a
  fancy long flexible tube like the spendy stuff, it will spray in any
  position, including upside down  sideways, which is good because
  that's necessary for full cleaning on the W124.
 
  First I replaced my rotted foam drain tubes, to keep the rinse out of
  the passenger compartment. Then with the A/C fan removed, I plastered
  every visible section of the evaporator with the Evap Foam. I let it
  'break down' for about 5 minutes, then repeated the treatment twice
  more. I used compressed air to blow the foam further into the
  evaporator and applied it one last time, then used a garden sprayer
  with water to rinse the evaporator clean (the water drains out the
  tubes under the car). The evaporator looks much cleaner now, and
  hopefully will work better in the summer heat.
 
  On a side note, I found this rant about a BG evap cleaning product,
  which looks an like a repackged DWD2 product with the BG name on it:
 
  http://www.badnissaninfiniticars.com/frigi.htm
 
  Even if it does work as described, I agree with the author of that
  page - it's false marketing to show what looks like before and
  after photos when they are really old, used and new, never
  installed. Check out the video linked there as well. Here's the DWD2
  website again, for reference:
 
  http://www.dwd2.com/
 
  And, this is the site selling DWD2 a little cheaper than above:
  http://www.ackits.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=dwd2
 
  Anyway, if you can find the Nu-Calgon product locally at a decent
  price, I think it's worth a try if your evaporator could use a little
  TLC. It's available on the internet (try eBay and Google) if you can't
  find it locally. I can't say I'd spring for the $25-$50 (with SH)
  that it would cost to buy the other products available. YMMV, etc...
 
  :-)
 
  Best regards,
 
  --
  Dave M.
  Boise, ID
  1994 E500 - 95kmi  (Q-ship)
  1987 300D - 261kmi (Sportline)
 




--
Dave M.
Boise, ID
1994 E500 - 95kmi  (Q-ship)
1987 300D - 261kmi (Sportline)



Re: [MBZ] CR report on headlight bulbs

2006-01-16 Thread Dave M.
Lee, what brand/model bulbs did you order? I'm curious to hear what
you get, and how they work. Another source is www.powerbulbs.com and
they do ship from across the pond.

:)

+dm

 --
 Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 10:03:14 -0500
 From: Lee Levitt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [MBZ] CR report on headlight bulbs

 Harry writes:
 
  Nothing big, I was going to sucker up the money and try a set
  of Sylvania Silverstars, one of the tested sets.  The other
  four were:  APC  Plasma Ultrs White; GE Nighthawk; Philips
  Crystal Vision and Wagner TruView.

 Check out www.rallylights.com. I ordered a set of their high performance
 bulbs for the ecode lamps I'm installing in my W124. Haven't got them in
 yet, so I can't comment on the results.

 Lee
 '93 300D 2.5 181K



Re: [MBZ] nice 2.5 turbo for those that have wrecked theirs

2006-01-16 Thread Dave M.
Wow! A diesel 124 with leather! Those are awfully rare in the 1990-95
range. The pleated leather door panels look so much nicer than
flat, perforated Tex. The final price was a little high, IMO, but
probably reasonable considering the car is barely broken in at 56kmi.
Then again, if it was a little old lady who drove one mile each way to
church and the grocery store...!

;-)

+dm

 --
 Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 10:32:10 -0600
 From: Kaleb C. Striplin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: [MBZ] nice 2.5 turbo for those that have wrecked theirs

 http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=4604735011



Re: [MBZ] 84 300SD Starter Question

2006-01-16 Thread Dave M.
Alan,

In my experience, jump-starting a diesel - whether it's a little VW
diesel, or an MB diesel - is very different than your typical gas
engine. To make a long story somewhat shorter, I finally learned that
6 gauge, or even 4 gauge, booster cables are nearly useless. 2 gauge
is barely adequate, but it's hard to find anything larger unless you
make them yourself from welding cable. The smaller cables make the
engine turn over very slowly. Bigger cables, or doubling-up two
pairs of smaller ones, made a HUGE difference even on my little VW
diesel 4-banger.

The best deal I know of is at AutoZone. They have a nice set of
2-gauge, 20-foot cables, made in USA, with beefy clamps for $39. I
looked all over and that's the best deal I could find for seriously
heavy-duty cables.

While your 300SD *could* have some other electrical issues, my money
is on the booster cables you were using. Try bigger ones, or simply
get the battery fully charged - that will eliminate that possibility
quickly. If a fully-charged Group 49 battery is having trouble
spinning the engine, you either have wiring problems, or a starter
going out.

:-)

-Dave M.

 --
 Date: 16 Jan 2006 20:25:21 -
 From: Alan Duff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: [MBZ] 84 300SD Starter Question

 I'm looking at a 1984 300SD with 231k miles. In attempting to start it
 using booster cables, with a hot jump battery, the starter spings very
 slowly. Never gets fast enough to start and he jumper cables get hot to
 the touch. Is this a bad starter or some other problem in the electrical
 system?

 Alan Duff
 Knoxville, TN



Re: [MBZ] Fat lotta good

2006-01-17 Thread Dave M.
For those of you wondering what it's like in Bolton Landing, where
Johnny lives, in the Adirondacks... let's just say the residents there
would consider a vacation to Alaska with  Eskimos in the middle of
winter to be a nice warmup. Say Johnny, do you have electricity out to
your igloo now?

;-)

-Dave M.
(ex-Adirondack resident, now in tropical Idaho)

 --
 Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 14:15:16 -0500
 From: John Berryman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [MBZ] Fat lotta good

Here's the sure start cold weather recipe: a real good battery and
 starter, a functioning pre-glow system, extra valve clearance, Mobil 1,
 block heater not needed above 0 degrees F. A hard wired timer and
 dedicated circuit for the outlet you plug your block heater into.
There is definitely an art to starting a diesel in a cold climate. I
 have a black-belt in cold start. I live in the Adirondack region of NY
 and drive MB diesels exclusively.


 Johnny B



Re: [MBZ] 450hp 126

2006-01-17 Thread Dave M.
The insane part is that the long block is capable of surviving with
200% more power. The Crazy Finns have proved it. Just need to modify
the exhaust and fuel delivery as Mitch described! The tranny may need
the clutch packs from an SL600 (which also uses the same basic 722.3
trans).

:)

+dm

 --
 Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 18:22:46 -0500
 From: Mitch Haley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [MBZ] 450hp 126


 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  i'm triing to imagine how much stuff would have to be strengthened on
 my SDL to handle the additional 300 horsepower... hmmm

 Injection pump, turbocharger, intercooler and transmission for starters.

 IP would need big modifications, turbo would need to be replaced
 with much larger, big intercooler purchased and plumbed, tranny can
 probably make do with valve, governor and modulator changes.



Re: [MBZ] nice 190D

2006-01-17 Thread Dave M.
That's a factory leather steering wheel, replacing the crappy vinyl
steering wheel. The wheels are mostly all interchangeable up to 1999,
although some later ones may need a new/different contact ring for the
airbag (if applicable).

The car looks pretty nice - too bad it's not a stick, and closer to Idaho.

:)

+dm

 --
 Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 18:43:14 -0600
 From: Kaleb C. Striplin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [MBZ] nice 190D


 yea, its non air bag, but the steering wheel is still different than any
 I have seen before.

 Jim Cathey wrote:

 Is that steering wheel aftermarket?
 
 
  Looks like a non-airbag model.  Consistent with its
  early year and the 2.2l 4-cylinder engine



Re: [MBZ] RARE and sought after 60x IP locking tool

2006-01-17 Thread Dave M.
That's the lock tool for all OM60x injection pumps, and most - but not
all - 617.95x pumps. For a while, a year or three ago, MB dealers in
the USA were claiming they couldn't get that tool - no idea why. It's
still on the MB price list and should be available but I don't know if
anyone has tried lately. The OE part number is 601-589-05-21-00, and
the price should be about $25 from Rusty. Here's a photo of the
genuine item:

http://www.w124performance.com/images/tools/IP__lock_tool.jpg

For the record, I would NOT buy the tool from that seller on eBay =
he's got an aftermarket copy, which has been reported to be of poor
quality, and not fit correctly (i.e., may not be usable). And, the
eBay price sucks, when you can get the genuine MB tool for less from
Rusty!!

BTW - if anyone has bought one of these from a dealership in the past
year or so, please let us know that they are now available once again.

;-)

-Dave M.


 --
 Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 18:52:24 -0600
 From: Kaleb C. Striplin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: [MBZ] RARE and sought after 60x IP locking tool


 http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/Mercedes-diesel-injection-pump-cam-Tool-Repair-Tools_W0QQitemZ4605462495QQcategoryZ43998QQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem
 --



Re: [MBZ] 300D 2.5L Turbo Diesel

2006-01-17 Thread Dave M.
Well, since he says it turns over and the cam turns, I'd say:

1) Bad glow relay (easy to test, check for +12v at the plugs)
2) Fuel delivery problems - vac shutoff stuck down?

It's pretty much gotta be one or the other, either no glow or no fuel.
Not much else to go wrong - this is assuming it cranks normally and
has SOME compression. Why do these deals always have to be 3000 miles
away? Sheesh... I'd snag this if it were near me (and if the price
stays cheap enough, which it probably won't.)

:)

+dm

 --
 Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 18:57:19 -0700
 From: Craig McCluskey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: [MBZ] 300D 2.5L Turbo Diesel

 http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=4605490544

 Currently at $111.50, with no reserve.

 Any idea what could be wrong?


 Craig



[MBZ] Part numbers for plastic vacuum tubing

2006-01-17 Thread Dave M.
Hi all,

I recently was looking up some part numbers for the Tecalan (plastic)
vac tubing used on most MB's. Here's some updated information. I'm not
sure if all these part numbers are still available, I may try to order
a few of the oddball ones and see what shows up. I have ordered most
of these in the past with good results. If your tubing is original, it
may snap like dry twigs if you look at them wrong - worth checking,
and replacing, if you haven't already done so. They're mostly under $3
per meter, MSRP - call Rusty to order. Some of the fittings 
splitters are a little higher, they can be $2-$6 each.


Vacuum line (plastic Tecalan pipe, 4mm OD, 1mm ID)
=
000-158-14-35 - Transparent (sort of white)
000-158-35-35 - Red?
000-158-88-35 - Transparent with brown stripe
000-158-89-35 - Transparent with red stripe
000-158-90-35 - Transparent with yellow stripe
000-158-91-35 - Transparent with blue stripe
000-158-92-35 - Transparent with gray stripe
000-158-93-35 - Transparent with black stripe
000-158-94-35 - Transparent with green stripe
000-158-96-35 - Transparent with violet  brown stripe
000-158-97-35 - Transparent with violet  red stripe
000-158-98-35 - Transparent with violet  yellow stripe
000-158-99-35 - Transparent with violet  blue stripe
000-997-39-52 - Brown
001-997-81-52 - Black
116-276-06-30 - Black with white lettering
123-276-16-30 - Black with red stripe


Rubber fittings  hose (3.5mm ID)
=
117-078-02-81 - 90-degree L shaped fitting
117-078-05-81 - 45-degree V shaped fitting
117-997-09-82 - Rubber hose (order by the meter)


Black loom (looks like thick heat shrink tube)
===
040621-008200 - 8mm ID
040621-011200 - 11mm ID (most useful on my car)
040621-012200 - 12mm ID
040621-014200 - 14mm ID
(notice the pattern here? Larger  smaller are available too...)


Branch fittings (splitters)
===
601-078-02-45 - Y shaped 2-port branch fitting (1 in, 2 out)
601-078-04-45 - Y shaped 3-port branch fitting (1 in, 3 out)
601-078-05-45 - Y shaped 4-port branch fitting (1 in, 4 out)
601-078-06-45 - F shaped 2-port branch fitting (1 in, 2 out)


If anyone orders these parts, and finds any of my information to be
inaccurate, PLEASE let me know and I'll update the list. About half
the numbers have been verified from past orders, the rest are best
guess from EPC data.

I also posted this on Rusty's forum for future reference:
http://buymbparts.com/forum/showthread.php?t=100


:)

--
Dave M.
Boise, ID
1994 E500 - 95kmi  (Q-ship)
1987 300D - 261kmi (Sportline)



Re: [MBZ] 1990 Mercedes Benz 300D 2.5 Turbodiesel

2006-03-19 Thread Dave M.
You think a 2.5 is fast? You should try my 87 300D... with the
full-load screw turned up a half turn, it now outruns my stock 1986
300E at the dragstrip. Not by much, but it's got a better ET. The 300E
will slowly pull away over 90mph, though. Another half-turn should
cure that, heh-heh.

Oh yeah - and that's despite the diesel's 2.65 axle, while the 300E
enjoys the advantage of a 3.07!

:)

-dm

 --
 Date: Sat, 18 Mar 2006 17:06:54 -0500
 From: John Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [MBZ] 1990 Mercedes Benz 300D 2.5 Turbodiesel


 I am really wanting to drive the 87 TD.  I haven't found anyone with one
 around here yet.  I think the 2.5 is fast.  Anyone have one in RI or MA?
 I'd like to see one.



  1   2   3   4   5   6   >