rpm dilemma, however, since openpkg is
essentially improving rpm I thought it's worth bringing up.
--
David M. Fetter - UNIX Systems Administrator
Portland State University - www.oit.pdx.edu
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
this?
--
David M. Fetter - UNIX Systems Administrator
Portland State University - www.oit.pdx.edu
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
this out in the near future.
On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 14:54 -0700, Doug Summers wrote:
David M. Fetter wrote:
Is there any word on this problem? I just tried to build emacs again
from current on the RHEL4 64-bit but it still wasn't recognizing the
architecture.
+ ./configure --cache-file
http://openpkg.org
User Communication List openpkg-users@openpkg.org
--
David M. Fetter - UNIX Systems Administrator
Portland State University - www.oit.pdx.edu
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
[link_size] = 0;
cpio_safer_name_suffix (link_name, false,
!no_abs_paths_flag, true);
link_size = strlen (link_name);
FYI.
--
David M. Fetter - UNIX Systems Administrator
Portland State University
On Thu, 2007-05-17 at 14:45 +0200, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
On Wed, May 16, 2007, David M. Fetter wrote:
On Tue, 2007-05-15 at 21:22 +0200, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
On Tue, May 15, 2007, David M. Fetter wrote:
Are you guys aware of this:
http://isc.sans.org/diary.html
On Wed, 2007-05-16 at 21:21 +0200, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
On Tue, May 15, 2007, David M. Fetter wrote:
All of the man pages throughout all of our openpkg rpms all are filled
with ESC characters, so it looks like the following excerpt:
--- BEGIN CUT ---
BUILD(1
On Tue, 2007-05-15 at 21:22 +0200, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
On Tue, May 15, 2007, David M. Fetter wrote:
Are you guys aware of this:
http://isc.sans.org/diary.html?storyid=2804;?
Thanks for the hint.
Well, I was going to update this rpm and upload it to current but the
patch fails
On Wed, 2007-05-16 at 21:13 +0200, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
On Tue, May 15, 2007, David M. Fetter wrote:
-Dperl-dbi::with_dbd_mysql = yes
-Dperl-dbi::with_dbd_pgsql = yes
-Dperl-dbi::with_dbd_sqlite = no
Leave out the blanks:
-Dperl-dbi::with_dbd_mysql=yes
-Dperl-dbi
Are you guys aware of this:
http://isc.sans.org/diary.html?storyid=2804;?
--
David M. Fetter - UNIX Systems Administrator
Portland State University - www.oit.pdx.edu
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
of these changes with no
difference in outcome. :-( Anybody have any ideas why suddenly the
build options in the build file would just stop being recognized?
On Mon, 2007-05-14 at 14:34 -0700, David M. Fetter wrote:
Well, we run the openpkg build command on our build servers as the opkg
user account
P.S. This is the same on RHEL4 and Solaris 10. It's also true on our
older rollout on both RHEL3 and Solaris 9. Basically, it's something
that broke a while ago which has been low priority for us to fix. Now
it's on the radar again.
On Tue, 2007-05-15 at 15:56 -0700, David M. Fetter wrote
Is the ~/.openpkg/build file still being acknowledged by openpkg-tools?
It seems that it is no longer being adhered too when doing the build to
create the build script. I just want to make sure this method wasn't
obsoleted somewhere along the lines.
--
David M. Fetter - UNIX Systems
for openpkg, openpkg-tools and the other packages that are
specific to openpkg were online. I can't seem to find them on the site
if they are.
--
David M. Fetter - UNIX Systems Administrator
Portland State University - www.oit.pdx.edu
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
:51 +0200, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
On Tue, May 08, 2007, David M. Fetter wrote:
Are the man pages for the specific openpkg software online somewhere on
the web site? It would be nice if they were. When we build our
software currently the man pages all fail to properly build for some
Ouch. We just barely started rolling out new servers with
2-Stable-20061018. H. This doesn't bode well for us.
On Mon, 2007-04-16 at 21:07 +0200, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
On Mon, Apr 16, 2007, David M. Fetter wrote:
I get this message if I try to install both gnupg and libtasn1
We have set 'coreutils::with_legacy = yes', however, it isn't making a
symlink from uname to guname like the others. Can this be fixed and put
into the 2.20061018 as an update please?
--
David M. Fetter - UNIX Systems Administrator
Portland State University - www.oit.pdx.edu
signature.asc
openpkg-users@openpkg.org
--
David M. Fetter - UNIX Systems Administrator
Portland State University - www.oit.pdx.edu
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Wed, 2007-03-21 at 20:18 +0100, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
On Wed, Mar 21, 2007, David M. Fetter wrote:
It seems that we have found yet another package that has issues on RHEL4
64-bit. Has anybody run into this and might know how this could be
fixed? Just curious before we start
with several packages where the build works with the openpkg gcc and
not the system gcc. If you are already doing this, it would have to
be some sort of system header weirdness.
-good luck
On 2/20/07, David M. Fetter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks. I'll try that out
On Wed, 2007-03-21 at 13:40 -0700, Bill Campbell wrote:
On Wed, Mar 21, 2007, David M. Fetter wrote:
On Wed, 2007-03-21 at 13:25 -0700, Bill Campbell wrote:
On Wed, Mar 21, 2007, David M. Fetter wrote:
It seems that for some reason gcc is not acknowledging
our /usr/local/include directory
the build works with the openpkg gcc and
not the system gcc. If you are already doing this, it would have to
be some sort of system header weirdness.
-good luck
On 2/20/07, David M. Fetter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks. I'll try that out.
On Tue, 2007-02-20
Ya, I did that already. It has the same failure.
On Tue, 2007-02-20 at 22:27 +0100, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
On Tue, Feb 20, 2007, David M. Fetter wrote:
In the 2.20061018 stable release gcc fails to build on RHEL4 (either
32-bit or 64-bit arch) when enabling the with_fortran option
Thanks. I'll try that out.
On Tue, 2007-02-20 at 16:18 -0800, Bill Campbell wrote:
On Tue, Feb 20, 2007, David M. Fetter wrote:
Ya, I did that already. It has the same failure.
It looks like some structure is missing members.
Look at line 2440 in this file to see what structure
P.S. http://shelleytherepublican.com/meaning-and-purpose.html ;-)
On Wed, 2006-05-03 at 12:50 -0700, David M. Fetter wrote:
This is completely crazy!
http://shelleytherepublican.com/2006/04/linux-european-threat-to-our-computers.html
--
David M. Fetter - Portland State University
, Doug Henry wrote:
The system chmod. I can't remember if I have tried the openpkg
(coreutils) one.
On 2/24/06, David M. Fetter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are you using the IRIX chmod or the gnu chmod from within
OpenPKG?
On Fri, 2006-02-24 at 10:16 -0500, Doug
, 2006-02-21 at 12:40 -0800, David M. Fetter wrote:
Ok, so I'm pretty sure that this has been brought up and even fixed a
while back, but I'm having some issue with this working. Now we're
still using OpenPKG 2.3 and that might be part of the issue. It builds
fine on RHEL3 but not on Solaris 9
This user here, Larry Lansing, contacted me on the community irc channel
because he said he was having issues subscribing to the mailing list.
He said that he gets the subscribe email and the successful confirmation
that he subscribed but he can't post anything. He does get the emails
though.
@openpkg.org
--
David M. Fetter - UNIX Systems Administrator
Portland State University
There are 10 types of people in the world, those that understand binary
and those that don't.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
openpkg-users@openpkg.org
--
David M. Fetter - UNIX Systems Administrator
Portland State University
There are 10 types of people in the world, those that understand binary
and those that don't.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
What does it mean when a system doesn't have a heartbeat? I have three
systems that seem to be now set as Departure because they don't have a
heartbeat, but they aren't departed. Are the rest of the servers I
registered today going to show up as departed tomorrow?
--
David M. Fetter - UNIX
elsewhere.
-- Robert Heinlein
__
The OpenPKG Projectwww.openpkg.org
User Communication List openpkg-users@openpkg.org
--
David M. Fetter - UNIX Systems
PROTECTED]
+49-172-8986801 (CET) +49-172-8986801 (CET)
__
The OpenPKG Projectwww.openpkg.org
Project Announcement List openpkg-announce@openpkg.org
--
David M
/usr/local/var/jboss/server/conf: cpio: rename failed - Invalid
argument
Has anybody else seen this? I haven't looked at the spec file
thoroughly yet. I figured I'd try to send an email to see if there is a
quick answer out there.
--
David M. Fetter - UNIX Systems Administrator
Portland
On Wed, 2005-08-24 at 11:41 -0400, Dan wrote:
On 8/22/05, David M. Fetter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Try this out:
http://www.cns.pdx.edu/documentation/openpkg/psu_unofficial_openpkg_howto.html.
On Mon, 2005-08-22 at 17:24 -0400, Dan wrote:
I'm trying to create a build environment
, as encouraged by the tutorial. So far I haven't found
documentation or example configs anywhere online, other than how to
specify settings using ~/.rpmmacros and a few env vars.
Could a developer share their configs or point me towards documentation?
--
David M. Fetter - UNIX Systems Administrator
__
The OpenPKG Projectwww.openpkg.org
User Communication List openpkg-users@openpkg.org
--
David M. Fetter - UNIX Systems Administrator
Portland State University - www.oit.pdx.edu
. Dijkstra, SIGPLAN Notices, Volume 17, Number 5
__
The OpenPKG Projectwww.openpkg.org
User Communication List openpkg-users@openpkg.org
--
David M. Fetter - UNIX Systems
That fixed it. Thanks.
On Fri, 2005-04-29 at 07:49 +0200, Michael van Elst wrote:
On Thu, Apr 28, 2005 at 03:26:56PM -0700, David M. Fetter wrote:
Ya, I noticed that when I looked at the log. It seems that the build
file might be getting parsed incorrectly or something. I attached
wrote:
On Thu, Apr 28, 2005 at 03:05:05PM -0700, David M. Fetter wrote:
Here's the full output file.
# ATTENTION: ne ignores option 'yes'
# ATTENTION: ne ignores option 'opkg-n'
# ATTENTION: ne ignores option 'www'
# ATTENTION: ne ignores option 'sys'
# ATTENTION: ne ignores option 'normal
on our Solaris build server but not on our Linux build server. Anybody
have any ideas about this or can it be fixed as a UPD?
--
David M. Fetter - UNIX Systems Administrator
Portland State University - www.oit.pdx.edu
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Thu, 2005-04-28 at 00:21 +0200, Michael van Elst wrote:
On Wed, Apr 27, 2005 at 03:08:26PM -0700, David M. Fetter wrote:
FATAL: errors occured while building:
bind-9.3.0-2.3.0: bind searches a frood called 'postgresql'
jabberd-2.0s6-2.3.1: jabberd searches a frood called 'postgresql
__
The OpenPKG Projectwww.openpkg.org
User Communication List openpkg-users@openpkg.org
--
David M. Fetter - UNIX Systems Administrator
Portland State University - www.oit.pdx.edu
signature.asc
__
The OpenPKG Projectwww.openpkg.org
User Communication List openpkg-users@openpkg.org
--
David M. Fetter - UNIX Systems Administrator
Portland State University - www.oit.pdx.edu
signature.asc
On Fri, 2005-04-08 at 20:59 +0200, Michael van Elst wrote:
On Fri, Apr 08, 2005 at 11:39:33AM -0700, David M. Fetter wrote:
It seems that when most of the rpms that have config files are upgraded,
the working config is moved to some *.rpmsave file and the new one is
put into place. What
. Is anybody aware of this problem? Has anybody
else seen this? It seems to be only on Solaris because we build under
RHEL3 and I don't have the same problem there.
--
David M. Fetter - UNIX Systems Administrator
Portland State University - www.oit.pdx.edu
signature.asc
Description
to see why these builds are failing.
Regards,
Simon
__
The OpenPKG Projectwww.openpkg.org
User Communication List openpkg-users@openpkg.org
--
David M. Fetter
I have a couple of quick questions:
1. What is the current status of the 2.3 release? Is it on schedule or
a bit behind?
2. Will I be able to upgrade OpenPKG from 2.1 to 2.3 directly or will I
need to update 2.1 to 2.2 then 2.2 to 2.3?
Thanks.
--
David M. Fetter - UNIX Systems Administrator
-0800, David M. Fetter wrote:
openpkg-2.1.2-2.1.2,openpkg-20040825-20040825
This is supposed to be one package name with version and revision
information.
I guess there is a typo in a requirement or provides where the
entries are not whitespace but comma separated.
Greetings,
--
David M
the UPD
directory, but we need to include it so that we have the security
updates and other bug fixes that are applied to the source rpms under
UPD. Can anybody assist me with this dilemma or point me in the right
direction please? Thanks.
--
David M. Fetter - UNIX Systems Administrator
Portland
ideas?
--
David M. Fetter - UNIX Systems Administrator
Portland State University - www.oit.pdx.edu
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Thu, 2005-01-20 at 00:09 +0100, Matthias Kurz wrote:
On Wed, Jan 19, 2005, David M. Fetter wrote:
So, we have a problem on of our newly built systems. It was jumpstarted
and OpenPKG installed as part of that, but the openpkg user accounts
(opkg, opkg-r opkg-n) were not detected. Now
Cool. Yeah, the setugids options seems to do the trick. How nice of
them. ;-) Thanks for pointing that out. Saved me some time.
On Thu, 2005-01-20 at 00:38 +0100, Matthias Kurz wrote:
On Wed, Jan 19, 2005, David M. Fetter wrote:
On Thu, 2005-01-20 at 00:09 +0100, Matthias Kurz wrote
On Fri, 2005-01-07 at 08:43 +0100, Michael van Elst wrote:
On Thu, Jan 06, 2005 at 05:08:24PM -0800, David M. Fetter wrote:
FATAL: errors occured while building:
postgresql-7.4.3-2.1.0: postgresql has conflicting requirement
That is a message from the build tool.
After tracing
--
David M. Fetter - UNIX Systems Administrator
Portland State University - www.oit.pdx.edu
##
## logrotate.spec -- OpenPKG RPM Specification
## Copyright (c) 2000-2004 The OpenPKG Project http://www.openpkg.org/
## Copyright (c) 2000-2004 Ralf S. Engelschall [EMAIL PROTECTED]
## Copyright (c
it does is create an empty file located
at /usr/local/var/ircd/auth. Does anybody have any ideas why this might
be happening?
--
David M. Fetter - UNIX Systems Administrator
Portland State University - www.oit.pdx.edu
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
because currently it is a major stopping block as the client
systems aren't getting their updates automagically as they should due to
this error?
Thank you.
--
David M. Fetter - UNIX Systems Administrator
Portland State University - www.oit.pdx.edu
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally
]
__
The OpenPKG Projectwww.openpkg.org
User Communication List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
David M. Fetter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PSU
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
__
The OpenPKG Projectwww.openpkg.org
User Communication List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
David M. Fetter - UNIX Systems Administrator
Portland State University - www.oit.pdx.edu
Only those who attempt the absurd can achieve the impossible
and we still haven't got
it all fully automated in the fashion we want.
--
David M. Fetter - UNIX Systems Administrator
Portland State University - www.oit.pdx.edu
Only those who attempt the absurd can achieve the impossible.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Tue, 2004-10-19 at 15:44, Michael van Elst wrote:
On Tue, Oct 19, 2004 at 02:29:41PM -0700, David M. Fetter wrote:
Well, in our last example problem, the installed instance of gcc was
simply a vanilla version with no additional options other than the
default. However we needed the f77
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
David M. Fetter - UNIX Systems Administrator
Portland State University - www.oit.pdx.edu
Only those who attempt the absurd can achieve the impossible.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
, once we deploy the newly built binary rpms into our
repository to be pushed out to client systems the openpkg build doesn't
acknowledge such changes. Is this a known bug? Does this make sense or
do you need more explanation?
--
David M. Fetter - UNIX Systems Administrator
Portland State University
On Tue, 2004-10-19 at 13:59, Michael van Elst wrote:
On Tue, Oct 19, 2004 at 10:20:35AM -0700, David M. Fetter wrote:
rebuilt. However, once we deploy the newly built binary rpms into our
repository to be pushed out to client systems the openpkg build doesn't
acknowledge such changes
that it puts them under the share directory
like everything else?
--
David M. Fetter - UNIX Systems Administrator
Portland State University - www.oit.pdx.edu
Only those who attempt the absurd can achieve the impossible.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
ignoring the other potential MTAs. Is that how this works? Because
it's not working like this for me. Perhaps I'm doing something wrong?
--
David M. Fetter - UNIX Systems Administrator
Portland State University - www.oit.pdx.edu
Only those who attempt the absurd can achieve the impossible
16:47:10.0 +0200
@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@
#endif
#include sys/types.h
-char *malloc ();
+/* char *malloc (); */
#ifndef DIRECTORY_SEPARATOR
# define DIRECTORY_SEPARATOR '/'
--
David M. Fetter - UNIX Systems Administrator
Portland State University - www.oit.pdx.edu
Only those who
and essentially implementing
OpenPKG throughout our environment in a nice manageable fashion for us.
It may not work for everyone, but it very well might be nice for many.
I figure it's only right to share. :-)
--
David M. Fetter - UNIX Systems Administrator
Portland State University
. What am I
doing wrong here? Are my switches wrong? Any other suggestions or
ideas on where to look at?
--
David M. Fetter - UNIX Systems Administrator
Portland State University - www.oit.pdx.edu
Only those who attempt the absurd can achieve the impossible.
signature.asc
Description
On Thu, 2004-07-08 at 13:01, Michael van Elst wrote:
On Thu, Jul 08, 2004 at 09:56:15AM -0700, David M. Fetter wrote:
What I'm doing is generating index.rdf files under each of these
subdirectories and one on the top level which should be picking up the
index files in the subdirectories
Is there any reason, besides a couple of files that have the same name,
that apache 1.3x and apache 2 can't be installed simultaneously? Just
curious.
--
David M. Fetter - UNIX Systems Administrator
Portland State University - www.oit.pdx.edu
Only those who attempt the absurd can achieve
Nevermind. Brain fart. I obviously need more coffee. :-)
On Fri, 2004-05-28 at 10:30, David M. Fetter wrote:
I want to change the default rpm build directories to be like the
following:
%_builddir %{l_prefix}/RPM/USER/TMP
%_tmppath%{l_prefix}/RPM/USER/TMP
, how? Thanks.
--
David M. Fetter - UNIX Systems Administrator
Portland State University - www.oit.pdx.edu
Only those who attempt the absurd can achieve the impossible.
__
The OpenPKG Project
Can I point the `openpkg build` command to point to my own internal
binary repository? If so, what would be an example of this command?
Also, as a side note, it would be nice if the man pages for build and
index would have a couple of examples.
--
David M. Fetter - UNIX Systems Administrator
On Tue, 2004-05-04 at 11:05, Steffen Weinreich wrote:
--On Dienstag, 4. Mai 2004 10:49 -0700 David M. Fetter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Can I point the `openpkg build` command to point to my own internal
binary repository? If so, what would be an example of this command?
We use
From what I can tell, if you have the Plan9 rc shell installed then when
rc.func calls for rc {args} it fails because it finds the Plan9 rc
instead of the builtin OpenPKG rc. Is this a bug or am I just doing
something wrong? Uninstalling the Plan9 rc fixes the problem.
--
David M. Fetter
On Wed, 2004-04-28 at 11:52, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
On Wed, Apr 28, 2004, David M. Fetter wrote:
From what I can tell, if you have the Plan9 rc shell installed then when
rc.func calls for rc {args} it fails because it finds the Plan9 rc
instead of the builtin OpenPKG rc
On Fri, 2004-04-16 at 00:08, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
On Thu, Apr 15, 2004, David M. Fetter wrote:
On Thu, 2004-04-15 at 10:47, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
Under OpenPKG 2.0 (and a not too out-dated OpenPKG CURRENT) just place
into prefix/etc/rc.conf the entry openpkg_rc_def=no and all
I noticed that after building and installing the service they are
enabled by default. I would prefer the opposite of that. Instead to
have them disabled. What is the easiest and best method to do this?
--
David M. Fetter - UNIX Systems Administrator
Portland State University - www.oit.pdx.edu
understanding this correctly, only dhcpd should start
on boot, right? That's not what is happening. Am I doing this wrong?
Thanks.
--
David M. Fetter - UNIX Systems Administrator
Portland State University - www.oit.pdx.edu
Has anybody successfully been able to incorporate a binary build of
OpenPKG in shell script form into a Solaris Custom Jumpstart? Just
curious. I'm working on doing it now for our environment.
--
David M. Fetter - UNIX Systems Administrator
Portland State University - www.oit.pdx.edu
On Tue, 2004-04-13 at 14:07, Thomas Lotterer wrote:
On Tue, Apr 13, 2004, David M. Fetter wrote:
Has anybody successfully been able to incorporate a binary build of
OpenPKG in shell script form into a Solaris Custom Jumpstart? Just
curious. I'm working on doing it now for our
to this
matter. Thank you.
--
David M. Fetter - UNIX Systems Administrator
Portland State University - www.oit.pdx.edu
__
The OpenPKG Projectwww.openpkg.org
User Communication List
How do I get the rpm rebuilds to keep the rpm-tmp.* file around so I can
look for information on why something failed? It looks like when I do a
rebuild even if it fails the rpm-tmp.* file is automatically removed
before I have a chance to review it.
--
David M. Fetter - UNIX Systems
.
--
David M. Fetter - UNIX Systems Administrator
Portland State University - www.oit.pdx.edu
__
The OpenPKG Projectwww.openpkg.org
User Communication List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
David M. Fetter - UNIX Systems Administrator
Portland State University - www.oit.pdx.edu
__
The OpenPKG Projectwww.openpkg.org
User Communication
List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
David M. Fetter - UNIX Systems Administrator
Portland State University - www.oit.pdx.edu
__
The OpenPKG Projectwww.openpkg.org
User Communication List
-63c4cb9f-3c591eda
openpkg-tool-20040217-20040218
Perhaps I need some dependency that I have overlooked. Thanks.
--
David M. Fetter - UNIX Systems Administrator
Portland State University - www.oit.pdx.edu
__
The OpenPKG Project
Spectacular! Yet again another quick success. Thanks everybody. This
is like the best freaking mailing list I've ever been on. ;-)
On Mon, 2004-03-15 at 15:16, Steffen Weinreich wrote:
--On Montag, März 15, 2004 15:06:55 -0800 David M. Fetter
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm attempting
be changed or manipulated for custom rebuilt
packages? That would be useful. Then we can keep essentially the same
naming convention with our own modified packages but have a different
tag to identify us.
--
David M. Fetter - UNIX Systems Administrator
Portland State University
On Thu, 2004-03-11 at 10:00, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
The tag is usually specified during bootstrapping with option --tag
but it can be overridden for each package on the rpm --rebuild command
line with an option --tag, too.
Spectacular! Thanks again.
--
David M. Fetter - UNIX Systems
Before I start hacking out my own spec file I figured I'd ask here to
see if anyone already has an LPRng spec file or src rpm they've put
together. It always makes sense to save time if one can, eh? :-)
--
David M. Fetter - UNIX Systems Administrator
Portland State University - www.oit.pdx.edu
I tested the scripts and build process on Solaris 9 and everything built
flawlessly. FYI. I'm anticipating the same with RHEL3. OpenPKG is
great!
On Mon, 2004-03-08 at 18:04, David M. Fetter wrote:
Hello, all. I wrote a quick and easy step-by-step document on how to
bootstrap openpkg
://www.fetterconsulting.com/index.php?name=opkginst. The
script I wrote is linked within the document. Hope this helps some out.
--
David M. Fetter - UNIX Systems Administrator
Portland State University - www.oit.pdx.edu
Ah, thanks. I was re-reading through some documentation to see if I
missed something, but I wasn't reading that one. Now I am enlightened.
:-)
On Tue, 2004-03-02 at 14:19, Thomas Lotterer wrote:
On Tue, Mar 02, 2004, David M. Fetter wrote:
David,
I don't see the openpkg-tool in the SRC
commands in one
bundle, including the old index and build ones).
__
The OpenPKG Projectwww.openpkg.org
User Communication List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
David M. Fetter
this magick incantation?
P.S. OpenPKG 2.0 is a phenomenol creation. We are most definitely
going to deploy it once it's released. I'm very pleased with my test
results thus far. Good work!
--
David M. Fetter - UNIX Systems Administrator
Portland State University - www.oit.pdx.edu
be that something is not found later, too.
-- END CUT
I've worked in many Solaris shops and it seems to be more common for
users to install the Development cluster rather than Entire
Distribution. Just thought I'd mention this after seeing this comment.
--
David M. Fetter - UNIX Systems Administrator
Portland
like 40,000 user accounts so uid consistency is rather
important. We don't want these uid's on the local hosts either. How do
I make this work or is it even possible? Something isn't adding up
right, that's for sure. Thanks.
--
David M. Fetter - UNIX Systems Administrator
Portland State
in advance.
--
David M. Fetter - UNIX Systems Administrator
Portland State University - www.oit.pdx.edu
__
The OpenPKG Projectwww.openpkg.org
User Communication List [EMAIL
1 - 100 of 102 matches
Mail list logo
