On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 23:50 -0800, Dave Laird wrote:
However, given the condition of the US economy at the present, and given the
abject lack of accurate verifiable information coming from The Shrub's
office, I am truly saddened by what I see coming.
The saddest part and also a fact that
On Wednesday 29 January 2003 06:44, Lyvim Xaphir wrote:
On Tue, 2003-01-28 at 22:49, Wolfgang Bornath wrote:
Sorry to bother you, but we were discussing whether there will be a
future for MandrakeSoft.
After tonight I wonder whether there will be a future for us all and
the world as we
On Wednesday 29 January 2003 09:50, you wrote:
All I've got to say for The Shrub, our President, is, SHOW ME THE BEEF!
If he shows me that he has proof for everything he said, especially the
parts about Saddam's weapons of mass destruction, I too will stand up and
join you in saying loudly,
Le mer 29/01/2003 à 11:52, Vahur Lokk wrote :
/...
So there is no good answer...
--
André Salaün.
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
On Wednesday 29 January 2003 09:11, you wrote:
You just described Hitler and the German people in 1939.
You just described Goebbels in the Berlin Sportpalast with 100,000
excited Germans shouting War!
Hmm...
Im watching another discussion of the kind in another list. And
surprise-surprise.
On Tuesday 28 January 2003 10:49 pm, Wolfgang Bornath wrote:
Sorry to bother you, but we were discussing whether there will be a
future for MandrakeSoft.
After tonight I wonder whether there will be a future for us all and
the world as we know it.
I listened to the US-Amercan president.
I'm
On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 13:08 +0200, Vahur Lokk wrote:
On Wednesday 29 January 2003 09:11, you wrote:
You just described Hitler and the German people in 1939.
You just described Goebbels in the Berlin Sportpalast with 100,000
excited Germans shouting War!
Hmm...
Im watching another
I'd like to argue with that bit about the nazi's... they did not have much
support from the people..
my real name is Franz.. I call myself frank to make it easier for people to
remember..
a good many of my relatives were killed by the SS nazi's for being part of
the resistance...
Once hitler was
On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 06:20 -0500, tarvid wrote:
On Tuesday 28 January 2003 10:49 pm, Wolfgang Bornath wrote:
Sorry to bother you, but we were discussing whether there will be a
future for MandrakeSoft.
After tonight I wonder whether there will be a future for us all and
the world as we
On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 20:15 +0800, Franki wrote:
Once hitler was in charge.. there was nothing even remotely like
democracy...
anyone that disagreed with him was locked up or killed.. many his own
generals were terrified of him.. and most of the general german army had no
real idea what
On Tuesday 28 January 2003 07:22 pm, Mark Weaver wrote:
Wolfgang Bornath wrote:
Sorry to bother you, but we were discussing whether there will be a
future for MandrakeSoft.
After tonight I wonder whether there will be a future for us all and
the world as we know it.
I listened to the
Has anyone got this to work under 9.0? It works just fine as a regular
proxy, but not transparently. Nothing shows up in the access.log, and
no packets leave the outside interface of the firewall running squid.
I've read the Transparent proxy mini-howto and the FAQ pages on
squid-cache and
On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 11:17:13AM +0100, Steffen Barszus wrote:
On Wednesday 29 January 2003 06:44, Lyvim Xaphir wrote:
On Tue, 2003-01-28 at 22:49, Wolfgang Bornath wrote:
Sorry to bother you, but we were discussing whether there will be a
future for MandrakeSoft.
After tonight I
OK could someone point me at the right document to figure this out? I will,
of course, share the answer back.
I have a friend who MUST remain concealed and who has recently gotten DSL.
The DSL service provided gives only Static IPs, and those are rather easy to
pinpoint for location--much
I have it working. Didn't do anything but copy the configuration over from
old installation when updated server from 8.2 - 9.0
On Tue, 28 Jan 2003, . wrote:
Has anyone got this to work under 9.0? It works just fine as a regular
proxy, but not transparently. Nothing shows up in the
On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 07:41 -0500, Mark Weaver wrote:
And what do you imagine those consequences to be if/when america goes to
war against Iraq?
That's an easy one, listen to all the analysts on tv. They are all
telling the same.
There are 2 possible ways the war may turn:
1. What Mr.
You didn't address the issue of what to do about saddam without fighting...
(assuming he is guilty.)
what are the alternatives.???
As for the question of spy's... who says they should pull them all out now
to save them???
The issue isn't resolved yet, if they pulled them out, they'd have to
On Wed, January 29 2003 7:16 am, civileme wrote:
*snip*
So anyone out there have any suggestions where to look to achieve that
masquerade?
Actually, civileme, that is more along the lines of a VLAN, or virtual LAN...
you would need to create a virtual connection from her computer to yours,
On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 13:18 +, Dallam Wych wrote:
I guess that perhaps is the way America and the uk feel when they
hear your chancellor repetively refer the german way. Talk about
scarey stuff, deja vu.
When did Mr. Schroeder say something like the German way? And when
did he say
On Wed, January 29 2003 7:55 am, Wolfgang Bornath wrote:
*snip*
BTW: What doo you think is the German way of today? From your
statement I doubt that you have any clue.
I think the Germans are so scared of their OWN past, that they will allow ANY
country to do whatever they want to do to their
Wolfgang Bornath wrote:
On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 23:22 -0500, Mark Weaver wrote:
Wolfgang Bornath wrote:
Sorry to bother you, but we were discussing whether there will be a
future for MandrakeSoft.
After tonight I wonder whether there will be a future for us all and
the world as we know it.
I
On Wed, January 29 2003 7:55 am, Wolfgang Bornath wrote:
Since WWII Germany has a very strong feeling against any military
involvement. As we have a more democratic way of dealing with our
chancellor (i.e. he has far less political power than your president)
he has to bend to the peoples will.
On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 07:57 -0600, Chuck Burns wrote:
On Wed, January 29 2003 7:55 am, Wolfgang Bornath wrote:
*snip*
BTW: What doo you think is the German way of today? From your
statement I doubt that you have any clue.
I think the Germans are so scared of their OWN past, that they will
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
This is WAY offtopic and would be better suited for an alt.* newsgroup. As a
US Desert Storm veteran and now reservist, I think I can speak for EVERYONE
that Bush is an idiot, in fact, he truly is the most ignorant, ill-educated
president that the
This is not the mailinglist to be political I gues.
But the reaction of mister burns shows me that it seems that americans feel very
misunderstood. :-)
Pretty funny for a superpower that has the largest depts in the world.
But let us at least try to have a common goal (linux-mandrake)
And
On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 08:01 -0600, Chuck Burns wrote:
No one likes us.
I don't know why.
We may not be perfect,We give them money,
But heaven knows we try. But are they grateful?
But all around, No, they're spiteful,
Even
There is a clear issue here.
It is international cooperation vs. unilateralism.
The Bush administration has demonstrated its contempt for internationalism
by:
1) abrogating the ABM treaty
2) scuttling the protocols for the biological weapons treaty
3) ignoring the Geneva Convention
4)
On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 09:12 -0500, Praedor Tempus Atrebates wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
This is WAY offtopic and would be better suited for an alt.* newsgroup. As a
US Desert Storm veteran and now reservist, I think I can speak for EVERYONE
that Bush is an
On Wed, January 29 2003 8:19 am, Wolfgang Bornath wrote:
*snip*
Cowardice has nothing to do with the brain. It is downright dumb to
call someone a coward who looks and thinks before he follows blindly.
*snip*
No, but completely disregarding the facts does have a lot to do with the
brain.
FACT:
On Wed, January 29 2003 8:32 am, Wolfgang Bornath wrote:
*snip*
Yes, I know that one and I just love it.
It's a very good example of putting the words so extreme that only a
very dumb person doesn't realize it's a joke with a very serious
background.
I see that you completely ignored my post,
On Wednesday 29 January 2003 09:36 am, Chuck Burns wrote:
On Wed, January 29 2003 8:19 am, Wolfgang Bornath wrote:
*snip*
Cowardice has nothing to do with the brain. It is downright dumb to
call someone a coward who looks and thinks before he follows blindly.
*snip*
No, but completely
On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 02:55:34PM +0100, Wolfgang Bornath wrote:
When did Mr. Schroeder say something like the German way? And when
did he say something that makes you look back to the Nazi era? It
would be a déjà-vu if he'd side up with Mr. Bush. The we'd really be
concerned.
Your
On Wednesday 29 January 2003 09:32 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is a clear issue here.
It is international cooperation vs. unilateralism.
The Bush administration has demonstrated its contempt for internationalism
by:
1) abrogating the ABM treaty
2) scuttling the protocols for the
On Wed, January 29 2003 8:43 am, tarvid wrote:
*snip*
Bush chooses internationalism when it suits him.
He scuttled Kyoto, ABM and the Biological weapons protocols and ignores the
Viena and Geneva conventions.
So, you think implementing a system that protects US citizens from ICMBs is a
bad
On Wednesday 29 January 2003 09:54 am, Chuck Burns wrote:
On Wed, January 29 2003 8:43 am, tarvid wrote:
*snip*
Bush chooses internationalism when it suits him.
He scuttled Kyoto, ABM and the Biological weapons protocols and ignores
the Viena and Geneva conventions.
So, you think
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 29 January 2003 10:08 am, tarvid wrote:
I like my horse, even though he is over 30 now.
30?! Wow. What kind of horse is he? Have you retired him to pasture grazing
or do you actually still ride him?
- --
Conservatives of all
On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 08:36 -0600, Chuck Burns wrote:
FACT: The French have oil contracts with Iraq.
Aha! Now we are seeing some real beef. The French have and the US have
not? (You may recognize that I'm coming down to your level of arguing
slowly but surely).
FACT: Nearly all the Iraqi
On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 08:38 -0600, Chuck Burns wrote:
On Wed, January 29 2003 8:32 am, Wolfgang Bornath wrote:
*snip*
Yes, I know that one and I just love it.
It's a very good example of putting the words so extreme that only a
very dumb person doesn't realize it's a joke with a very
On Wednesday 29 January 2003 10:07 am, Praedor Tempus Atrebates wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 29 January 2003 10:08 am, tarvid wrote:
I like my horse, even though he is over 30 now.
30?! Wow. What kind of horse is he? Have you retired him to pasture
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Good morning, Mike...
On Wednesday 29 January 2003 06:20 am, Mike Veltman wrote:
And please respect the fact that a lot of europeans have a different view
of the Irac case.
...as do *SOME* Americans.
Dave
- --
Dave Laird ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Hello.
I have mandrake 9.0.
It's up-to-date.
I have both libqt3-3.0.5-7mdk and libqt3-devel-3.0.5-7mdk installed.
Now whenever I try to complile an app with QT I get:
/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lqt I have variable QTDIR=/usr/lib/qt3
I tried to poke around to see where the lib is and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 29 January 2003 10:27 am, Wolfgang Bornath wrote:
On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 08:36 -0600, Chuck Burns wrote:
FACT: The French have oil contracts with Iraq.
Aha! Now we are seeing some real beef. The French have and the US have
not?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Good morning, Wobo...
On Wednesday 29 January 2003 06:37 am, Wolfgang Bornath wrote:
Looking back I realize that I have made a mistake by opening this
thread. Sorry folks, I'll start a new one on my experiences with the
Beta2 of 9.1 in some
Frankl says To put it simply, we MUSTN'T judge Bush, because we have no idea
what he knows..
I say very wrong statement,,, absolute power corrupts absolutely. We MUST
Judge the Government continueally, if we are ever to hope to have a
government by the people, for the people and of the people.
On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 14:56 +, Dallam Wych wrote:
BTW: What doo you think is the German way of today? From your
statement I doubt that you have any clue.
In all honesty, I only spend a few weeks a year now in germany as
opposed to the 1970's when I spent perhaps 3 months out of the
On Wed, 2003-01-29 at 08:57, Chuck Burns wrote:
On Wed, January 29 2003 7:55 am, Wolfgang Bornath wrote:
*snip*
BTW: What doo you think is the German way of today? From your
statement I doubt that you have any clue.
I think the Germans are so scared of their OWN past, that they will allow
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 29 January 2003 10:35 am, tarvid wrote:
On Wednesday 29 January 2003 10:07 am, Praedor Tempus Atrebates wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 29 January 2003 10:08 am, tarvid wrote:
I like my horse,
On Wed, 2003-01-29 at 09:38, Chuck Burns wrote:
On Wed, January 29 2003 8:32 am, Wolfgang Bornath wrote:
*snip*
Yes, I know that one and I just love it.
It's a very good example of putting the words so extreme that only a
very dumb person doesn't realize it's a joke with a very serious
With all due respect, I may have something to say here: it is also very
tempting to generalize about Americans, my friend, but it is almost as
dangerous. The fact that some of my compatriots may agree with the bully-ism
of Dubya, does not make us all boil in the same pot. I have been so sicken
Mr. Barszus,
Please refrain from posting privately on a mailing list, it really
isn't proper netiquette.
- Forwarded message from Steffen Barszus [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2003 15:12:21 +0100
From: Steffen Barszus [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re:
On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 10:53 -0500, Lyvim Xaphir wrote:
That's right, Chuck; that's exactly what you would expect from a
brainwashed socialist liberal with absolutely no facts on their side
except for worthless emotional outbursts created by the flood of
brainwash diarrea from the communist
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 29 January 2003 10:53 am, Lyvim Xaphir wrote:
On Wed, 2003-01-29 at 09:38, Chuck Burns wrote:
On Wed, January 29 2003 8:32 am, Wolfgang Bornath wrote:
*snip*
Yes, I know that one and I just love it.
It's a very good example
On Wednesday 29 January 2003 11:14 am, Wolfgang Bornath wrote:
On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 10:53 -0500, Lyvim Xaphir wrote:
That's right, Chuck; that's exactly what you would expect from a
brainwashed socialist liberal with absolutely no facts on their side
except for worthless emotional
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 29 January 2003 09:54 am, Chuck Burns wrote:
On Wed, January 29 2003 8:43 am, tarvid wrote:
*snip*
Bush chooses internationalism when it suits him.
He scuttled Kyoto, ABM and the Biological weapons protocols and ignores
the
On Wed, 2003-01-29 at 05:17, Steffen Barszus wrote:
First of all, this is not the right place to discuss this .. but we had many
OT-discussions here, why not these...
Wobo had his tit; I had the tat, then offered to take it private. Looks
like it's public anyway. Fine.
I don't take
yeah, I'd go along with most of that.. accept for a couple of points..
1. I stand by my comment about not Judging him.. for one thing.. if you
don't know the facts, how can your judgement possibly be appropriate?? (also
I was referring to the war issue, not the economy, that you can judge for
On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 11:14 -0500, et wrote:
looks like poop... smells like poop, feels like poop, if you think it's not
poop, then you taste it
In this case I'd rather put it like this:
Looks like poop... smells like poop... feels like poop. Now it's up to
you to believe or not when
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 29 January 2003 10:53 am, Lyvim Xaphir wrote:
On Wed, 2003-01-29 at 09:38, Chuck Burns wrote:
On Wed, January 29 2003 8:32 am, Wolfgang Bornath wrote:
*snip*
Yes, I know that one and I just love it.
It's a very good example
On Wed, 2003-01-29 at 10:36, Praedor Tempus Atrebates wrote:
There is a little thing of lost oil field control by US oil companies as a
result of all the Desert Storm, etc, ugliness. Bush would love nothing more
than to install a friendly leader in Iraq who would then turn over the oil
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The only reason that he posted privately (by error) is that you have got a
reply to set while discussing on a mailing list.
Sorry, but that is your fault.
Sascha Noyes
On Wednesday 29 January 2003 11:08 am, Dallam Wych wrote:
Mr. Barszus,
Hi!
I'm a guy living in Argentina, far away from the bullets.
El Mié 29 Ene 2003 10:23, Franki escribió:
You didn't address the issue of what to do about saddam without fighting...
(assuming he is guilty.)
what are the alternatives.???
There are always alternatives. May be leave the
On Wednesday 29 January 2003 11:29 am, Franki wrote:
3. Oil, I don't recall hearing that the Oil fields that the US liberated in
Desert storm are now owned by the US did I miss some important news
flyer here??? who is running Kuwait now??? I wasn't aware it was the
No oil fields were
Keep talking sonny. Oh, that is until the terrorists come and bomb your
insignificant little cities like Aarhus, Copenhagen ...etc. Then, just
maybe THAT will change your mind.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Wolfgang Bornath
Sent:
I beg your all pardon but I could not keep my fingers away from the
keyboard after such a stupid things written below.
First, Bush (and I put him apart from USA because America, despite
elected him, is greater than that asshole) never signed Kyoto Protocol,
but USA (Clinton) had previously signed
On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 11:34:31AM -0500, Sascha Noyes wrote:
The only reason that he posted privately (by error) is that you have got a
reply to set while discussing on a mailing list.
Sorry, but that is your fault.
I don't think so, I think it is a kmail thing. It isn't my mutts
fault that
On Wed, 2003-01-29 at 11:29, Franki wrote:
Those who do not heed the past are destined to repeat it.. so he is at least
making an effort to stop something before it happens now.. history is full
of cases where no action was taken till it was too late.. who knows, he
might actually stop the
El Mié 29 Ene 2003 11:54, Chuck Burns escribió:
We never SIGNED kyoto, because it was nothing more than a ploy to LOOK GOOD
to ecologists. The WORST polluting countries are the 3rd world countries
with NO environmental protection agencies, and the Kyoto treaty left them
alone, so, of course
On Wednesday 29 January 2003 17:08, Dallam Wych wrote:
Mr. Barszus,
Please refrain from posting privately on a mailing list, it really
isn't proper netiquette.
Sorry that I did not checked if your reply-to header is set right. I know it
is bad behavior and you would know it that I know it
first of all... repeat after me. FRANKI IS NOT AN AMERICAN :-)
I'm an Aussie...
Second.. the US must be spending what ?? 5-10 millian a day at the very
least, probably a good deal more, putting all that military might around
iraq... and its been going on for a very long time...
That sort of
On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 06:02:21PM +0100, Steffen Barszus wrote:
Sorry that I did not checked if your reply-to header is set right. I know it
is bad behavior and you would know it that I know it after reading my sig.
So I need to update kmail ;) . My intend was to quote the text you have
maybe they are learning.. albiet slowly..
They did not put a dictator in charge of afganistan... they tried to start a
democracy if memory serves...
it doesn't seem to be working to well so far, but thats what they did..
I can only assume they would do the same in Iraq.. if not because they
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 29 January 2003 11:46 am, Alan Wilter Sousa da Silva wrote:
I beg your all pardon but I could not keep my fingers away from the
keyboard after such a stupid things written below.
[...]
Pardon Praedor, but I could not help myself
On Wed, 2003-01-29 at 11:14, Wolfgang Bornath wrote:
On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 10:53 -0500, Lyvim Xaphir wrote:
That's right, Chuck; that's exactly what you would expect from a
brainwashed socialist liberal with absolutely no facts on their side
except for worthless emotional outbursts
I wish you people would quit cluttering my mailbox with all this crap. There are other
lists where this would be appropriate.
Franki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote ..
first of all... repeat after me. FRANKI IS NOT AN AMERICAN :-)
I'm an Aussie...
Second.. the US must be spending what ?? 5-10
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 29 January 2003 11:57 am, Alfredo C. López wrote:
El Mié 29 Ene 2003 11:54, Chuck Burns escribió:
We never SIGNED kyoto, because it was nothing more than a ploy to LOOK
GOOD to ecologists. The WORST polluting countries are the 3rd
On Wednesday 29 January 2003 11:32 am, Sascha Noyes wrote:
The terms socialist and liberal are mutually exclusive.
Sascha Noyes
so that is your final say on that? or how do you realy feel?
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
On Wednesday 29 January 2003 18:23, Dallam Wych wrote:
On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 06:02:21PM +0100, Steffen Barszus wrote:
Sorry that I did not checked if your reply-to header is set right. I know
it is bad behavior and you would know it that I know it after reading my
sig.
So I need to
chill out guys, I like a heated discussion as much as the next guy, but when
it degenerates to name calling and personal attacks, its not a discussion
anymore..
its childish namecalling.. and I stopped doing that when I turned 27 some
years back.. :-)
rgds
Franki
-Original Message-
On Wed, 2003-01-29 at 12:18, Franki wrote:
maybe they are learning.. albiet slowly..
They did not put a dictator in charge of afganistan... they tried to start a
democracy if memory serves...
Poor wording on my part - I was referring to the Millions of dollars in
aid, weapons and training
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 29 January 2003 12:23 pm, Mark Weaver wrote:
Wolfgang Bornath wrote:
[...]
Last polls in USA show that nearly half of the American people don't
want war against Iraq in any case. In Germany our chancellor wouldn't
get away with
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 29 January 2003 12:24 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I wish you people would quit cluttering my mailbox with all this crap.
There are other lists where this would be appropriate.
Franki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote ..
first of all...
interestingly enough, the newbie list has been on topic all night... go
figure :-)
quote
And what is democratic about having your leader appointed by a foreign
authority, anyhow?
/quote
Didn't they get all the leaders of the various tribes together and let them
elect one to lead???
Short of a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 29 January 2003 12:45 pm, Franki wrote:
[...]
believe it or not.. often a dictator is better economically then a
democracy (at least initially).. simply because the leader need not worry
about public opinion.. but that certainly
There are 361 newsgroups that include the keyword 'politics' on my usenent
server.
It can't be beyond all the clowns currently clogging up my Mandrake Expert
list to take their blasted arguments re the US/Irag conflict over to one of
those groups.
AT LEAST TAKE IT OFF THIS LIST.
regards
On Wed, 29 Jan 2003 17:57:31 +
Daryl Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
AT LEAST TAKE IT OFF THIS LIST.
Agreed!!!
Thankfully using claws I can set an ignore flag.
Charles
Pure drivel tends to drive ordinary drivel off the TV screen.
(or computer monitor)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 29 January 2003 01:13 pm, Charles A Edwards wrote:
On Wed, 29 Jan 2003 17:57:31 +
Daryl Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
AT LEAST TAKE IT OFF THIS LIST.
Agreed!!!
Thankfully using claws I can set an ignore flag.
What is
On Wed, 2003-01-29 at 18:06, Praedor Tempus Atrebates wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 29 January 2003 01:13 pm, Charles A Edwards wrote:
On Wed, 29 Jan 2003 17:57:31 +
Daryl Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
AT LEAST TAKE IT OFF THIS LIST.
On Wed, 29 Jan 2003 13:06:42 -0500
Praedor Tempus Atrebates [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What is claws?
sylpheed-claws, a damn great email program.
Charles
A freelance is one who gets paid by the word -- per piece or perhaps.
-- Robert Benchley
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 29 January 2003 01:26 pm, Charles A Edwards wrote:
On Wed, 29 Jan 2003 13:06:42 -0500
Praedor Tempus Atrebates [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What is claws?
sylpheed-claws, a damn great email program.
Ah. I know of sylpheed and have
On Tuesday 28 January 2003 03:07 pm, Mark Weaver wrote:
anyone know when that one's due out?
Ahem:
When it's ready...
grin
I always hated getting that answer!
Ric
LOL...I had that coming.. :)
Not nearly as infuriating as -RSN- (Real Soon Now grin
--
Hey Dave,
I got AVview from the GATOS project running... but it seems to be of little use since
I don't have a TV turner on that card, and no TV coax cable connection... I only have
a video in and a video out like the ones you have on more recent video game consoles.
You have to be able
On Wednesday 29 January 2003 02:11 am, Wolfgang Bornath wrote:
Totally different situation. The American president and the congress
did not want to go to war against Germany because a lot of large US
companies were tied up with Germany (mostly with the IG Farben
conglomerate). The Jewish
On Wed, 29 Jan 2003 13:19:58 -0500
Praedor Tempus Atrebates [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ah. I know of sylpheed and have used it, I didn't know realize there
was a claws as part of its name...or is there a variant of just
sylpheed?
There are 2, sylpheed and sylpheed-claws.
Claws is an enhanced,
New flick, coming to a theatre of war soon:
The Bush Administration
In Association With
The Other Bush Administration
Presents
Gulf Wars__
E P I S O D E I I
Clone Of The Attack
See the full movie poster:
On Wednesday 29 January 2003 12:14 pm, Praedor Tempus Atrebates wrote:
of US citizens with contrary views to those of the court-appointed US
president and his apologists - I count several besides myself in this list
thus far. Not all Americans respond with reflex support for what the
current
On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 13:39 -0500, Ronald J. Hall wrote:
On Wednesday 29 January 2003 02:11 am, Wolfgang Bornath wrote:
Totally different situation. The American president and the congress
did not want to go to war against Germany because a lot of large US
companies were tied up with
On Wednesday 29 January 2003 02:17 pm, Wolfgang Bornath wrote:
In case you don't know it yet: Pearl Harbour was attacked by the
Japaneze. They are the slightly smaller men with (mostly) slanted eyes
and live on some islands across the Pacific Ocean to the West of you.
Thats exactly what I
I've been attempting to set up an enviroment that will let a user use
sftp, but not allow them to 'walk' the rest of the system.
I've tried _numerous_ different variations (created a chrooted user, using
rbash or sftp-server as a shell, etc), and none of them seemed to work. I
seem to be going
On Wed, 2003-01-29 at 08:18, Dallam Wych wrote:
I'm not religious, I wish I were. This madman and the options he has
scare me to death.
wobo
I guess that perhaps is the way America and the uk feel when they
hear your chancellor repetively refer the german way. Talk about
scarey
Wolfgang Bornath wrote:
On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 13:18 +, Dallam Wych wrote:
I guess that perhaps is the way America and the uk feel when they
hear your chancellor repetively refer the german way. Talk about
scarey stuff, deja vu.
When did Mr. Schroeder say something like the German way?
1 - 100 of 149 matches
Mail list logo
