Err Mine still does.
--
Robert P. Nix Mayo Foundation.~.
RO-OC-1-18 200 First Street SW/V\
507-284-0844 Rochester, MN 55905 /( )\
-^^-^^
In theory, theory and practice are the same, but
in practice,
Sports Illustrated says the world is ending December 31st, 2011. At least
that's when their calendar ends.
--
Robert P. Nix Mayo Foundation.~.
RO-OC-1-18 200 First Street SW/V\
507-284-0844 Rochester, MN 55905 /( )\
-
Good luck! Hope you enjoy retirement as much as you enjoyed VM. Remember
those still in the trenches
--
Robert P. Nix Mayo Foundation.~.
RO-OC-1-18 200 First Street SW/V\
507-284-0844 Rochester, MN 55905 /( )\
-
alan_altm...@us.ibm.com wrote:
On Sunday, 03/20/2011 at 05:53 EDT, RPN01 nix.rob...@mayo.edu wrote:
We just installed a z10 processor this morning, and the Dirmaint
satellite on
it won?t install a directory. The message I get says that there is no
DIRECTORY
statement which matches the serial
We just installed a z10 processor this morning, and the Dirmaint satellite
on it won¹t install a directory. The message I get says that there is no
DIRECTORY statement which matches the serial and model number, and then has
the serial and model in parens. OK, so I cut and paste the serial and
V-disks stay around until the last user releases them, so could you have
them linked read-only by a second user as well to keep them alive until
you¹re done with them?
--
Robert P. Nix Mayo Foundation.~.
RO-OC-1-18 200 First Street SW/V\
507-284-0844
Is there a good or widely accepted way to wait in autolog1 until the vmsys:
pool is up and available?
--
Robert P. Nix Mayo Foundation.~.
RO-OC-1-18 200 First Street SW/V\
507-284-0844 Rochester, MN 55905 /( )\
-
I apologize; As you said, nobody (including me) reads the epilog.
No, I don't think the dates have changed again since then, although there
has been talk of extending daylight savings to year-round (which makes no
sense to me at all...)
Sorry for not actually reading through the code. I should
Was that script created before or after they changed when daylight savings
goes into effect? It may not be correct any more... Be sure to check the
results after you get it working.
--
Robert P. Nix Mayo Foundation.~.
RO-OC-1-18 200 First Street SW/V\
How is the disk defined in the CP Directory entry (i.e. What is the mode of
the disk), and what is in the console log when the user was logged in that
could give a clue about the status of the disk when the user was
initialized?
The mode will tell you the condition(s) that could lead to it being
initialization.
Thanks,
Steve
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU] On
Behalf Of RPN01
Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2011 2:33 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: zLinux OS disk read-only
How is the disk defined in the CP
It really depends on how much planning you¹ve done beforehand.
We have our LPARs set up so that they share DASD, share the same CP
Directory, and are on the same TCP/IP subnet, so here, it¹s just a matter of
bringing the userid down on one z/VM system, and bringing it up on the
other. It¹s really
: Re: RSCS CTCA between a first and second level system...
Sent by: The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
On Monday, 02/07/2011 at 11:53 EST, RPN01 nix.rob...@mayo.edu wrote:
The systems are polar and npolar.
DMTNCR916E Invalid NJE signon connection record received
I need to transfer some files between a first and second level system, and
tried to define an RSCS CTCA connection, but when I try to start the
connection, the see each other, but immediately shut down the link. The
second level connection gets the following messages:
DMTCMY700I Activating link
The systems are polar and npolar.
On 2/7/11 10:22 AM, Alan Altmark alan_altm...@us.ibm.com wrote:
On Monday, 02/07/2011 at 11:15 EST, RPN01 nix.rob...@mayo.edu wrote:
DMTCMY700I Activating link NPOLAR NJE line=AA20 class=*
queueing=priority
DMTNET141I Line AA20 ready for connection to link
I wanted to generate a new CMS segment to pick up a changed S minidisk, and
suddenly couldn¹t remember the exec which generates the CMS shared segment
skeleton. (The auto accident knocked it right out of me, I think...)
I know it¹s simple, and it takes an argument of CMS. I just can¹t remember
/( )\
-^^-^^
In theory, theory and practice are the same, but
in practice, theory and practice are different.
On 1/26/11 3:24 PM, Shimon Lebowitz shim...@iname.com wrote:
I think you mean SAMPNSS CMS
which IIRC is on MAINT 193.
Shimon
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 11:14 PM, RPN01 nix.rob
The issue with keeping the grants in AUTOLOG1 or in SYSTEM CONFIG is that
you have to either continually modify those files every time you create a
new Linux image, or you have to keep a separate list of Linux images
somewhere for AUTOLOG1 to read (though you probably have to anyway).
Putting the
Altmark alan_altm...@us.ibm.com wrote:
On Wednesday, 12/08/2010 at 08:31 EST, RPN01 nix.rob...@mayo.edu wrote:
Is there anyone out there that actually gains security from CP users not
being granted onto their vSwitches? How many people would like to be
able to
define a vSwitch as open
He said he liked typing, not killing trees...
--
Bob Nix
On 11/23/10 1:30 PM, Mark Post mp...@novell.com wrote:
On 11/23/2010 at 10:19 AM, George Henke/NYLIC
george_he...@newyorklife.com
wrote:
Please tell ur laughing friends that GUI, *point and click*, is for people
who can't type.
I think this is an issue that needs to be addressed. This is a critical set
of files, which z/VM only has tools to back up to tape, and many sites no
longer even have tape drives to use to create these tape backups. We no
longer have any tape drives, real or virtual, attached to the systems, so
The benefits are far greater than the loss of directly editing your
directory. Have you ever edited your directory and put it online, only to
find out later that you¹d managed to overlay a minidisk or important piece
of CP¹s disk? It shouldn¹t happen again if you correctly implement Dirmaint.
And
Same here; I've been using the PDF files for quite some time now.
--
Robert P. Nix Mayo Foundation.~.
RO-OC-1-18 200 First Street SW/V\
507-284-0844 Rochester, MN 55905 /( )\
-^^-^^
In theory, theory and
The obvious argument against using the rdev in the volser is when you end
up needing to move the data to a new volume, or restore the pack after a
physical problem, then you no longer have a match between the volser and the
rdev, and it becomes very confusing from there.
There really isn¹t one
Have you checked with these users to see if they are logging off when done,
or just disconnecting from their sessions?
Never overlook the human factor in all this. It may just be as simple as
changing a user habit.
--
Robert P. Nix Mayo Foundation.~.
RO-OC-1-18 200
I¹m going to dig into the manuals in a moment, but can anyone quickly tell
me if the CTCA connections used by the various parts of CSE can have
redundant sets of connections? (I¹m about to lose the set I¹m using to a
POR, and I need to know if I should switch to a second set, or do a better
job of
Thanks. I've got that one set up now, and will add it to our Autolog1
shortly.
In RSCS, I noticed the ROUTE control. Would it be valid to say that I could
set up a ROUTE for the two system names, pointing to two separate LINKDEFINE
connections defining two CTCA paths?
I haven't been able to find
/( )\
-^^-^^
In theory, theory and practice are the same, but
in practice, theory and practice are different.
On 8/17/10 10:17 AM, Alan Altmark alan_altm...@us.ibm.com wrote:
On Tuesday, 08/17/2010 at 09:52 EDT, RPN01 nix.rob...@mayo.edu wrote:
I?m going to dig into the manuals
Flashcopy does not account for any disk buffers linux still has cached and
unwritten. It will mitigate the situation where the disk is changing while
it is being backed up.
All in all, if you're talking about running images, full-pack backups are
basically worthless.
--
Robert P. Nix
, Inc. -The Chesapeake Life Insurance
Company(r), Mid-West National Life Insurance Company of TennesseeSM and The
MEGA Life and Health Insurance Company.SM
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System
[mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf Of RPN01
Sent: Monday
Another way of wording this is that adding CPUs to a virtual machine allows
the guest to take advantage of multitasking, but does not increase the total
amount of CPU time the image receives. If single threading tasks in the
image is the bottleneck, then adding a CPU may relieve it. But if this
Just to cover all the bases, you never said if you¹d started using TCPIPV,
or had any data on the minidisk. If not, then you can simply change the
MDISK statement, put the new CP directory online and go with it, no
problems.
If there is already data there, then you could allocate a new minidisk
It doesn't solve your web problem, but IBM has taken orders and support
calls over the phone for decades. Sometimes the old ways work the most
reliably. Just order what you need by phone, and then worry about the
IBMLink problem once you have your system in the state it needs to be in.
Say hi to
Hi Bill;
We have 295 CP volumes (3390 mod 27) shared between the two LPAR's, running
CSE. There are an additional 15,652 volumes owned by z/OS, which we keep
offline to z/VM.
We run a script in AUTOLOG1 which goes through the list of volumes and makes
the decision for each if it should stay
I know this has been run into before, but I can¹t remember the solution. I¹m
getting the message ³FCXPMN446E Incomplete monitor data: SAMPLE CONFIG size
too small² when perfsvm comes up. This just started last night, and it has
run since December without problems until last night. I remember that
I haven¹t tried redefining the DCSS yet, but I have tried changing the
SAMPLE CONFIG SIZE from 1500 to 2000, and I¹ve tried increasing the virtual
machine size from 140meg to 256meg. Neither has any effect on the problem.
--
Robert P. Nix Mayo Foundation.~.
RO-OE-5-55
Ok... I purged and redefined the DCSS, and now I don¹t get the message; I¹m
waiting to see if it really starts collecting.
I did ³DEFSEG 9000-AFFF SC RSTD², matching our previous segment.
My questions now are, What happened to the prior segment that caused it to
fail? Could the problem have been
I plan to talk to the hardware people in a moment to see if anything was
added recently?
We do have a large amount of DASD that is really owned by z/OS, which we
immediately take offline, but they¹d still be in the config area.
--
Robert P. Nix Mayo Foundation.~.
RO-OE-5-55
Our MONDCSS grew, perhaps too large, while fighting this type message a long
time ago. Once the problem was resolved, we didn't attempt to back off the
changes we'd made, and the large size doesn't seem to hurt anything at the
moment. I know that ultimately, making the segment larger was not the
We can now see what is eating our system, and it turns out that it¹s z/VM...
CPU Load Vector Facility Status
or
PROC TYPE %CPU%CP %EMU %WT %SYS %SP %SIC %LOGLD
%VTOT %VEMUREST ded. User
P00 IFL99 991 1 94
And, it seems that our second LPAR (on another CEC) is playing the same
game...
P00 IFL 100 1000 0 100 0 61100 .... ... Master
P01 IFL712 69 291 0 88 71 .... ...
Alternate
--
Robert P. Nix Mayo Foundation.~.
[mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf
Of RPN01
Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2010 2:46 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: After getting PerfKit working...
We can now see what is eating our system, and it turns out that it¹s z/VM...
CPU Load
guests on the same volume and let CP exploit PAV can improve IO rates.
2010/3/25 RPN01 nix.rob...@mayo.edu
Another point I¹ve not seen mentioned, and I¹m not sure if it¹s true or
not...
Given a dedicated volume to a Linux guest, won¹t the guest start only one I/O
to the device at a time
/2010 at 12:44 PM, RPN01 nix.rob...@mayo.edu wrote:
Is the controller smart enough to
be able to start an I/O to each, even though the I/O*s were sent to the same
3390 address?
It might be, but CP and Linux are not, so the waters aren't all that muddy
after all. We really don't want to try
Another point I¹ve not seen mentioned, and I¹m not sure if it¹s true or
not...
Given a dedicated volume to a Linux guest, won¹t the guest start only one
I/O to the device at a time, and wait for it to complete? If you break up a
larger volume into several minidisks (like a mod 27 into mod 9¹s)
Except that's not the size of a 3390-27. Ours are all 32760 cylinders in
size.
--
Robert P. Nix Mayo Foundation.~.
RO-OE-5-55 200 First Street SW/V\
507-284-0844 Rochester, MN 55905 /( )\
-^^-^^
In theory,
The other route you could take, if protection from a shutdown is the goal,
change the class of the shutdown to Z or S, and don¹t give this priv to
anyone. Use the Set Priv * +Z as part of the shutdown process.
--
Robert P. Nix Mayo Foundation.~.
RO-OE-5-55 200 First
I don't think, in this case, it is the user causing the problem at all. The
user didn't define their storage allocation, and in practice can't do that
at all. So the user didn't set up the situation which caused the integrity
issue, the system administrator did.
The system administrator is in
You can get even cleaner than that:
From a priv¹ed user, use the command FOR userid CMD LINK * cuu cuu M, and
then go to the linux system to work with it. You avoid accidentally logging
the guest out instead of disconnecting, and issuing other commands you
didn¹t intend to. Another choice is to
I count nine. Seriously, though; there's nothing there that indicates if a
userid is running linux or some other utility. Being disconnected isn't
significant, because someone could be connected to the console of one. I
counted esaweb01 and 02 because I didn't recognize them any more than
The first thing I don't like about this is that it is very prone to human
error during the process of adding or removing images. This is just one
more, in a long list of files, that has to be edited each time a guest is
added. One more place for mistakes to be made.
I'd first create a central,
Exactly what business problem are you trying to address by doing this?
Compare what you're doing to an Intel world implementation. Would you ever
place two Intel boxes sharing disk, and with no knowledge of each other,
side by side, and boot both systems from the same root disk? What results
The best solution for your problem is to couple the two systems with CSE, so
that they¹ll know what the other is doing.
Before we implemented CSE, we created a service we called Janus, which we
ran in the profile of each Linux server during the CMS startup. The purpose
was to look up which system
If the two guests are truly using the same, R/W disks, then even if they
don¹t know it yet, your disks are corrupted. I hope you have backups.
We run the same guest on two different z/VM systems, ONE SYSTEM AT A TIME.
It is very important that it not be logged in on both systems at the same
time.
If I remember the story correctly, you won't see a version such as 6.0,
because in IBM wisdom, this would imply that there would be following
releases (due to the decimal). Now why it's ok to have 6.1, and why that
doesn't carry the same implication, I don't know.
--
Robert P. Nix Mayo
for a free PAV address and may be able to launch it instead of
queueing it. Linux -as far as I know- is also PAV aware, so it can launch
more than one IO on condition that one gives it PAV addresses, otherwise it
won't be able to exploit it.
2009/6/30 RPN01 nix.rob...@mayo.edu
Before I put
:
MDISK 391 3390 1500 500 VOL001 M (I removed the W)
MINIOPT PAVALIAS 1391 2391
would create 391 as base and 1391 plus 2391 as PAV alias addresses.
2009/7/2 RPN01 nix.rob...@mayo.edu
Your response verifies what I¹d thought was happening, but doesn¹t address
the whole ³multiple
Before I put something huge together to test this, I thought I¹d pass it by
all the experts.
Linux has the ability to multipath, and z/VM supports multipathing via PAV.
There¹s lots of documentation and studies showing that you can attach /
dedicate the PAV addresses to a Linux LPAR or guest, and
So many people come to us with a ³solution², instead of presenting us with
their ³problem². They have some big picture, and want some small piece of it
implemented for them. They have a restricted view of what is available, what
the impact of what they¹re asking for is, and what other techniques
I didn¹t log in for awhile and, due to advancing age (actually a year older
tomorrow too), I¹ve forgotten what I made the MAINT password. And, since
this was also the main password used for almost all the service machines, I
don¹t have any other locations to log into that would help me. I know;
Yes, I discovered this shortly after asking. I was able to do this from
OPERATOR, and then use DEFINE MDISK to get access to the disk and see the
USER BACKUP file to get the passwords I needed.
The evil question that comes to mind now is, could an auditor site you
because the operators
Actually, OPERATOR has it by default, though I¹m not sure why it needs it
other than problems like this one.
--
Robert Nix -- Mayo Clinic
On 5/12/09 3:51 PM, Scott Rohling scott.rohl...@gmail.com wrote:
- Don't hand out OPTION DEVMAINT indiscriminately (as in this case -- does
OPERATOR
Sorry to hear this. I wish I could say we had a position for you here, but
things have gotten tight all over.
Good luck.
--
Robert P. Nix Mayo Foundation.~.
RO-OE-5-55 200 First Street SW/V\
507-284-0844 Rochester, MN 55905 /( )\
-
To take this a step further, what if the vendor has had notice from the
operating system vendor of the implementation of a new security feature, and
has not made their install compatible with that new security, and yet never
mentions the fact in the install documentation?
(IBM Read closely) We
I attempted this yesterday, and I haven¹t searched the archives yet, so if
this has been gone over, I apologize.
Looking through the books, it would appear that the changes needed to go
from layer 3 to layer 2 protocol would be to add ³ETHERNET² to the vSwitch
definition, and to add ³ETHERNET² to
Wouldn¹t the EREP program actually have to be waiting and understand SMSG
messages, otherwise, what do you expect it to do with the message once
received?
Of course, I could be blowing smoke, and EREP does indeed have features to
do this that I¹m unaware of or have forgotten. (Getting old is such
How many vSwitch rdevices can a single controller userid control? I had
thought it was one, but it appears that they can support more than one... Is
there a limit?
We were adding a second vSwitch in preparation to convert from fiber OSAs to
copper, and I defined two additional controller userids
for failover. If you're
using link
aggregation, you can use up to 8; but they are not coded on the Vswitch
statement.
RPN01 wrote:
How many vSwitch rdevices can a single controller userid control? I had
thought it was one, but it appears that they can support more than
one
The simple answer is ³No².
Realistically, most hackers can barely afford their laptops. Not many have
the funds to put a zSeries box in their garage to play with, and most
installations don¹t let them on to play, so there isn¹t a lot of knowledge
within the hacker¹s easy reach for learning about
I have a production vSwitch with a back-up OSA, and I¹d like to take out the
back-up OSA for a moment and test it separately from its normal vSwitch.
If I redefine a vSwitch on the fly, will it go ³down² for any amount of time
while reconfiguring? Or for that matter, can I even do a DEFINE
Thanks... That actually makes sense. :-)
--
Robert P. Nix Mayo Foundation.~.
RO-OE-5-55 200 First Street SW/V\
507-284-0844 Rochester, MN 55905 /( )\
-^^-^^
In theory, theory and practice are the same, but
Note that the method described below will miss any W0 files that might have
been on the original disk. If you use mode 0 files at all, then this is NOT
a good method of enlarging a minidisk.
--
Robert P. Nix Mayo Foundation.~.
RO-OE-5-55 200 First Street SW/V\
There are various naming options for the PROFILE TCPIP file to support
various combinations of multiple stacks and systems, but I think I¹ve found
one that isn¹t quite supported...
We run CSE in a two CEC environment. Our z/VM systems are called POLAR and
GRIZZLY. We¹ve had a single vSwitch
and practice are the same, but
in practice, theory and practice are different.
On 11/20/08 1:54 PM, Rich Greenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On: Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 01:02:20PM -0600,RPN01 Wrote:
} I set up a second TCPIP virtual machine on POLAR (TCPIP2), and created a
} TCPIP2 TCPIP file
Rather than posting your ³perceived solution² to your problem, can you tell
us what your actual problem is? What are you trying to solve, as opposed to
what you think the solution might be?
By the way: CMS has been able to accept lower case at the command line for
many years. CP tends to convert
/( )\
-^^-^^
In theory, theory and practice are the same, but
in practice, theory and practice are different.
On 10/28/08 2:42 PM, Alan Altmark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday, 10/28/2008 at 03:28 EDT, RPN01 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If IBM would allow
I generally use M, since if I can¹t get write access, I don¹t really need it
at all at the moment.
The whole issue isn¹t that great here, as we have only four actual users
that would ever attempt to get write access to the Linux guest 191 shared
disk, and two of us sit within shouting distance
Linux guests, I'd do them
the same way.
Dennis
We are Borg of America. You will be assimilated. Resistance is futile.
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of RPN01
If you¹re just IPLing CMS to set things up and then IPL Linux, is there
really a reason to have multiple 191 minidisks? We share a single read/only
191 minidisk among all the Linux guests, in both LPARs. They all end up
IPLing 391, and we¹ve added a piece to the profile that looks for userid()
are different.
On 10/28/08 11:50 AM, Mary Anne Matyaz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, two things. I thought you had to have a writable A disk for CMS? And we
do need
a redhat.conf file on there when we kickstart the linux, not so much
afterwards.
MA
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 12:45 PM, RPN01 [EMAIL
One problem w/ SFS is that we don't run it on our second LPAR at all.
Anything that we want to be able to run on both systems has to reside on a
minidisk. SFS isn't a choice.
If IBM would allow the vmsys: pool to be shared between systems, we'd be
more likely to use it.
--
Robert P. Nix
VSWG isn't the name of the test vswitch; it's the production one...
(could've just yelled this over the cube wall, but this was more fun. ;-) )
--
Robert P. Nix Mayo Foundation.~.
RO-OE-5-55 200 First Street SW/V\
507-284-0844 Rochester, MN 55905 /(
You can also make it a bit more readable, and less character set dependent,
by replacing the \= with .
--
Robert P. Nix Mayo Foundation.~.
RO-OE-5-55 200 First Street SW/V\
507-284-0844 Rochester, MN 55905 /( )\
-
natural.
Regards,
Richard Schuh
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of RPN01
Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2008 6:48 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Some REXX help
You can also make it a bit more readable
I need to relabel some volumes, including page and spool volumes... Are
things such as the checkpoint and warmstart data strictly done based on the
position in the CP-Owned list? Or will the actual volume labels matter, if
the SYSTEM CONFIG has been adjusted prior to the shutdown and re-IPL?
I
Don't you two sit close enough to talk?
--
Robert P. Nix Mayo Foundation.~.
RO-OE-5-55 200 First Street SW/V\
507-284-0844 Rochester, MN 55905 /( )\
-^^-^^
In theory, theory and practice are the same, but
Physical addresses don't matter. You IPL from your RES volume, using the
physical address on which it resides. On that volume, the SYSTEM CONFIG file
defines what other volumes are needed to make up the system (CP OWNED for
page and spool, SYSTEM for other z/VM related volumes containing user
In principle, what you've done is correct... But very wrong. :-)
We NEVER put an mdisk statement under a SYSAFFIN statement. All the
minidisks that need to be owned by a specific LPAR are defined in the
userid DISKOWNR, and the only thing under the SYSAFFIN statements are LINK
statements back to
Try the command ³DIRM CMS LISTFILE DEFAULT DATADVH *² followed by a ³DIRM
CMS Q DISK x² where x is the mode given in the Listfile output.
--
Robert P. Nix Mayo Foundation.~.
RO-OE-5-55 200 First Street SW/V\
507-284-0844 Rochester, MN 55905 /( )\
link to the system that doesn't need it.
I find this easier as the directory entry of the user completely tells
what is what, otherwise having the remember that 03 stands for RSCS
etc is something I couldn't, not even when 15 years younger.
2008/7/28 RPN01 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
In principle, what
One thought on a single LPAR system and DirmSat: You can use DirmSat on a
single system to maintain a directory on another volume, such that if you
have a problem with your primary CP Directory volume, you have a backup to
that that can be quickly activated without having to resort to tape.
--
That doesn¹t deal with the write-enabled minidisks owned by those users,
though. You¹d need to use SYSAFFIN to isolate minidisks to specific LPARs,
and if you did this, your filepools wouldn¹t actually be shared. If you
don¹t do something with SYSAFFIN and just allow all the systems to access
the
Without looking, I'd guess that the 150 disk ends up being /boot, though I'd
say the size is too small to all maintenance to be applied there, and the
other two disks become your other filesystems and directories, in some
layout or another.
You say full pack, but that has no meaning today so it's
We use it for our Linux image cloning, where we copy two to three 3390 mod 9
volumes to create the new image. From request to first boot of the copied
image is roughly 18 to 25 seconds. Can¹t fault that at all...
--
Robert P. Nix Mayo Foundation.~.
RO-OE-5-55 200
Try MAKEBUF instead of MAKBUF; rc = -3 is command not found.
Wouldn¹t the close command be CLOSE OPERATOR CONS? Not CONS OPERATOR...
This is without getting any manuals or help files involved, and my mind
isn¹t what it used to be, so no warrantee implied...
--
Robert P. Nix Mayo
The fact that it is ³CP OWNED² and not ³CP SYSTEM² would lead me to wonder
about your statement ³Being that the volume is already labeled should I
assume that it has allocated to lets say PERM?². I wouldn¹t make such an
assumption, especially if someone took the trouble to put it in the CP Owned
This sounds vaguely like the old VM Workshops. I only attended four of them,
I think, but I learned a lot there and made lasting friends within this
community. Share and other conferences just aren't the same, and I've never
found another conference where you could fill a French restaurant with
We started with vSwitch grants in SYSTEM CONFIG, then moved to reading lists
of Linux guests and dynamically granting them to the vSwitch. We then
switched (no pun inteneded) to COMMAND statements in each CP Directory to
grant the vSwitch and couple the NIC to the vSwitch. This seemed to be the
Just for the clarification and sanity of all, are you talking about shell
scripting in Linux, or programming for the ISHELL in z/OS? They are two
absolutely separate and distinct environments, and there is little (possibly
nothing?) in common between them.
--
Robert P. Nix Mayo
To avoid losing people to the mental hospital, all devices have the same
identity everywhere they can be seen within our two CECs (10+ LPARs). To do
otherwise would cause insanity at some future point.
--
Robert P. Nix Mayo Foundation.~.
RO-OE-5-55 200 First Street
1 - 100 of 244 matches
Mail list logo
