Hi,
My name is Marc Gemis. I'm new to OpenStreetMap. Since I'm using
OpenFietsMap on my Garmin device and I hope to give something back.
I saw that in my area (Reet (Rumst)) a number of Buurtwegen (BW) en
Voetwegen (VW) are not on the map. I could also add a number of paths in the
Park van Boom
. (Except if BW23 is what you actually found on the name tag)
Polyglot
2011/4/15 Marc Gemis marc.ge...@gmail.com
Thanks everybody for confusing me even more ;-)
Anyhow, I downloaded JOSM and added my first 'buurtweg' BW 23
Hopefully, I took the right conclusions for the tags
regards
m
Hi all,
Now, I really understand why I was hesitating to start adding roads. ;-)
Anyhow, I'll change it to 'track'.
Here's the sign that you can find at the ends of Voetwegen and Burrtwegen in
Rumst (incl. Terhaghe, Reet) and Boom
Hi guys,
I need some help to tag the following:
- building
- lake (visput)
- the area around it
I thought of using a multipolygon for this, but I'm unsure how to tag this
properly.
Similar: how do I tag the different fields of a soccer club the buildings
?
Any examples that I can use ?
Hello,
I did the Vogelzangpad in Nijlen today. How do I update the wiki page with
all the correct links ?
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Belgium/Walking_Routes#Antwerpen_2
regards
m
___
Talk-be mailing list
Talk-be@openstreetmap.org
Julien,
I would have given you that information, if I had known that someone else
would update the wiki page.
I see that the coloured arrow is missing. It should be a yellow one. Did I
tag something incorrectly ?
Peter,
Ik heb deze week vakantie en heb nu wat tijd om wandelingen te maken. Zelf
I have added quite a few 'knooppunten' of the Rivierenland regional walking
network.
This information is not available through the Walking Routes wiki page.
Recently the Zuid-Dijleland network was added to the wiki page. Therefore
people created a
collection containing all nodes and routes of
Sorry, for bringing up this topic in the first place. I thought that a new
consensus on mapping regional mapping networks was reached, since an
experienced mapper was using it.
While I understand that there are pros and cons on the documented method and
Gerard's method, I continue to use the
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 1:00 PM, talk-be-requ...@openstreetmap.org wrote:
If the signposts have Kempense Heuvelrug, I would create a separate network
relation for it. We can always have collection relations to group them
together at a higher level.
The signposts are marked Antwerpse Kempen,
Here is the page on maxspeed.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:source:maxspeed
this is the section on the signs that left me with the questions
Tagging sign positions
Practice has shown that it is generally useful to *additionally* map the
positions of maxspeed signs. It is suggested to
I use a slightly different way than Jo describes:
For terraces (rijhuizen) I purely use the terrace tool. This creates the
associates street as well if needed. It can add to an existing relation as
well.
So I create 1 big building with the building tool (w). Select the building
and the road. Run
Hello,
How do we map the followings amenities in Belgium ?
- Taverne -- they serve more than only snacks or light meals (more
restaurant-like), but they also serve (only) drinks, pancakes, etc (more
cafe-like -- i.e. as intended by the amenity=cafe tag).
- Cafe -- What I mean here is a cafe
Sander,
ivm met verschillende data op verschillende zoom levels. Ik vermoed
dat het gevolg is dat niet alle zoom levels op hetzelfde moment terug
worden opgebouwd. Je ziet gelijkaardige effecten op bv.
openwandelkaart.nl of de lonvia maps. Wandelwegen die je toevoegt,
verschijnen niet even snel
2012/1/20 talk-be-requ...@openstreetmap.org: - Als we straten
maar verwijderen net voor we de nieuwe er op zetten, om voorgaande
problemen op te lossen, dan bestaat het gevaar dat we de oude OSM
data gebruiken om die opnieuw er op te zetten (wat ons in een
twijfelachtige situatie brengt qua
Sorry about that.
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 10:30 AM, talk-be-requ...@openstreetmap.org wrote:
This was my mail, not Jo's.
___
Talk-be mailing list
Talk-be@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
Hi all,
I have a few tagging questions
* How do I tag a 'Feestzaal/Sale de fête' that is part of a
pub/restaurant ? usually it has a different name than the
restaurant/pub
* How do I tag a place that rents rooms for conferences, and other
activities ? e.g. http://www.roosendael.be
regards
m
Can someone please help me to tag/place the administrative node for
Elzestraat (part of Sint-Kathelijne-Waver)
http://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elzestraat
?
thanks
m.
___
Talk-be mailing list
Talk-be@openstreetmap.org
Sommige wandelnetwerken gebruiken '01', anderen '1', ik tag zoals ik ze
tegenkom.
De lijst van alle netwerkrelaties die ik heb aangemaakt, vind je ook terug
op de wiki.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Belgium/Walking_Routes
Voor al deze relaties heb ik ook afkortingen verzonnen
On http://www.flosm.de/html/POI-Karte.html I noticed that Dusseldorf
Schiphol have the tag
aerodrome = international
aeroway = aerodrome
Zaventem only has
aeroway = aerodrome
But it might be better to contact the creator of openbusmap (see Legal
Info/License) on the website and ask which
Jo, can I ask you why you do not follow the description of
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:source:maxspeed ?
which states e.g.
country_code:context (where the speed limit is defined by a particular
context, for example urban/rural/motorway/etc.)
Where the speed limit is indicated by
For your own favorite walks, cycle routes etc you can use either
GPSies.org or wikiloc.org
m
___
Talk-be mailing list
Talk-be@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
I've added most of those addresses in Reet.
I use JOSM all the time to create associatedStreet relations.
I vaguely remember seeing a different behavior at a certain point, where
JOSM started adding addr:street tags to the buildings when its building
tool creates an associatedStreet relation. Is
I was wondering whether there is tag (or combination of tags) that can be
used to mark a Protected Monument (Bescherm monument -- blue white sign) -
http://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cultureel_erfgoed_in_Belgi%C3%AB
I also noticed that there is a similar sign but red/white, some buildings
in
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 10:03 AM, talk-be-requ...@openstreetmap.org wrote:
Being way to quick again, a little google search action turns up this,
with a .be section :
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/heritage
But that remains a propostition since 2009
This is
For a section between C35 and C37 one could use the overtaking key, see
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:overtaking.
Is it ok to add this tag to the wiki page ?
m
___
Talk-be mailing list
Talk-be@openstreetmap.org
I was wondering whether someone would be interested to set up a
How_to_map_a-page in Dutch or French. I consult the German regularly for
things I tag frequently. I would be nice to have one in Dutch. see e.g.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/How_to_map_a
encoding=UTF-8?
presets xmlns=http://josm.openstreetmap.de/tagging-preset-1.0;
author=Marc Gemis
version=0.1
shortdescription=Mapping in Flanders / Voor (beginnende) mappers in Vlaanderen
description=De bedoeling is om een aantal veel gebruikte tag combinaties te groeperen, zodat beginnende
gebruikers
is het niet afgesloten.
** **
Guy Vanvuchelen
** **
*Van:* Marc Gemis [mailto:marc.ge...@gmail.com]
*Verzonden:* donderdag 14 februari 2013 13:56
*Aan:* OpenStreetMap Belgium
*Onderwerp:* Re: [OSM-talk-be] Josm Presets
** **
Bedankt Guy,
** **
de file was als
Overdekte schuilplaats is amenity=shelter
voor bushokjes komt daar dan shelter_type=public_transport bij.
2013/2/15 Glenn Plas gl...@byte-consult.be
Kleine opmerking,
een shed is niet enkel een tuinhuisje, dit wordt ook gebruikt voor een
overdekte schuilplaats (bushokje bv). Eigenlijk
micromappen aan een stuk
deze nacht, zelfs bus shelter's ;-)
Na een tijdje zie je S staan en je denkt shed.
Het bushokje is idd een slecht voorbeeld, maar punt was vooral dat er nog
meerdere type's zijn.
sry.
Glenn
On 02/15/2013 10:45 AM, Marc Gemis wrote:
Overdekte schuilplaats is amenity
Ik heb net gezien dat de presets nu via de Josm website beschikbaar zijn.
Maar, blijkbaar is er nog iets verkeerd met de vertalingen. Op het moment
dat je de preset installeert, krijg je 2 foutboodschappen. Als je telkens
aangeeft dat je toch wil installeren, komt het daarna wel goed. Want als je
er (nog) niet bij.
Het is een wiki. Verbeteren is toegestaan.
Groeten,
Erik
Op 15 februari 2013 08:18 schreef Marc Gemis marc.ge...@gmail.com het
volgende:
ik ben altijd zo vroeg op in de week :-)
Er staat nog een foutje in (daarnet gezien). Hoe kan ik dat nu wijzigen
op de wiki
Just my .5 cent
Ik map de poort op de kruising van de weg en de omheining.
Als je echt gedetailleerd wil mappen dan zijn er wel gevallen waar er een
poort is met daarnaast een smalle doorsteek voor voetgangers, waar je dan
een opening zou kunnen laten. Maar dan moet je ook wel een voetweg door
of the translations before. It has been
fixed for the next version of Josm
m
2013/2/16 Marc Gemis marc.ge...@gmail.com
Ik heb net gezien dat de presets nu via de Josm website beschikbaar zijn.
Maar, blijkbaar is er nog iets verkeerd met de vertalingen. Op het moment
dat je de preset installeert, krijg
Mijn method is Garmin + waypoints voor alle huizen. Voor rijen gebruik ik
wel bv. R1+-+11 voor aangesloten bebouwing. (rechts van looprichting
oneven nummer 1,3,5, 7, 11).
Omdat ik bijna continu lig te typen vind je zo ook alle straatmeubilair
(als je ertegen loopt of erover struikelt :-) )
Via OSMPAD kan je inderdaad in de field de huisnummers controleren.
Met een Garmin GPS kan je enkel nadien controleren. Dus de nummers die in
de field worden ingegeven, kunnen nadien vergeleken worden met wat reeds in
in OSM aanwezig is.
Het is dan wel geen nieuwe data, wel controle data. Is het
locatie ga ik immers altijd de straat waaraan de woning
ligt inbrengen maar het adres kan best een andere straat zijn, zeker bij
huizen die ergens in het midden van een bos of veld staan.
** **
Guy Vanvuchelen
** **
*Van:* Marc Gemis [mailto:marc.ge...@gmail.com]
*Verzonden:* maandag
?
Hetzelfde met het aantal rijstroken.
** **
Guy Vanvuchelen
** **
*Van:* Marc Gemis [mailto:marc.ge...@gmail.com]
*Verzonden:* maandag 18 februari 2013 16:02
*Aan:* OpenStreetMap Belgium
*Onderwerp:* Re: [OSM-talk-be] Housenumber collection
** **
op die ongekende
How up-to-date is this PICC database ?
I randomly clicked on the map, and came in Orbais.
There I see at least 15 houses without red rectangle. Does this mean that
they are not in the database yet ?
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 10:25 PM, A.Pirard.Papou
a.pirard.pa...@gmail.comwrote:
On 2013-02-18
2013/2/19 Guy Vanvuchelen guido.vanvuche...@pandora.be
Knooppunten: Er zijn twee relaties : Wandelnetwerk Antwerpse Kempen en
Wandelnetwerk Antwerpse Kempen – Kempense Landduinen. Op het internet vind
ik dat het Wandelnetwerk Antwerpse Kempen onderverdeeld is in 10 routes
waaronder Kempense
...@gmail.comwrote:
On 2013-02-19 05:30, Marc Gemis wrote :
How up-to-date is this PICC database ?
I randomly clicked on the map, and came in Orbais.
There I see at least 15 houses without red rectangle. Does this mean that
they are not in the database yet ?
15 houses out of how many?
Where else did you
Dat is vreemd want die highway=living_street staat er nu al bij.
dit is wat er nu (0.6.1 de versie op de wiki en dus downloadable) in staat
item name=Living Street (max 20) nl.name=Woonerf (max 20)
icon=presets/living_street.png type=way
key key=highway value=living_street/
key key=maxspeed
I know that a lot of people are still working on the translation of the
German webpage, but when I proposed to make such a Dutch page, I also
thought that it would be nice to include some, what I assume, are typical
Belgian objects.
Since there is no defined tag-set for those items, as far as I
ook)
fase 3 : EN DAN aanvullingen en wijzigingen (in overleg)
Als we het anders gaan aanpakken word het 1 grote knoeiboel.
Bedankt voor de suggesties, waar ik ondermeer vierkantshoeve (met
multipolygoon), holle weg enz zou willen aan toe voegen.
Op 20 februari 2013 11:15 schreef Marc Gemis
Als het niet duidelijk is of de naam van de gemeente, deelgemeente of
gehucht moet gebruikt worden, dan ben ik voorstander van enkel de naam op
de bushalte te vermelden. Mappen wat er op de grond is.
Ik begrijp wel dat een dienstregeling waar vier keer Kerk staat niet echt
duidelijk is en dat er
Tja, als ze dan nog altijd de juiste gemeente naam voor hun haltes moesten
hebben...
De halte van de Nieuwstraat in Rumst is een paar honderd meter opgeschoven
en ligt daarmee in Terhagen. Ga je telkens de naam van de halte aanpassen ?
m.
2013/2/22 Marc Gemis marc.ge...@gmail.com
Als het niet
2013/2/23 Jo winfi...@gmail.com
name:De_Lijn
BENELUX preset is aangepast. Versie 0.9.1 bevat deze extra tag.
@George, neen, het gaat om halte 106769, die lag vroeger meer naar het
oosten, net buiten het bebouwde deel van Terhagen. Mogelijks in
deelgemeente Rumst, hoewel de grens in OSM anders
Dan zal het mappen van die busstops wel vooruit gaan. :-)
De eerste reactie na de meeting was misschien niet bij iedereen even
positief, maar ik heb de indruk dat de mensen wel blij zijn met die lopende
vertaling van Hoe map ik een en Guy is ook blij met de presets. En jij nu
ook. Hopelijk
Ben,
geen enkele van je links lijkt me te werken. De eerste 3 misschien omdat ik
nog geen login heb (krijg gewoon about:blank, bij de 2 laatste kan de
server de bestanden niet vinden.
Wat ik een beetje jammer vond aan de flyers, is dat de nadruk precies nog
ligt op het inbrengen van straten in
In The Netherlands they will do something simular. Import the data on a
dedicated layer in JOSM, and then copy to the data layer and upload. France
idem (according to Jo). So still a lot of manual work.
They also told me that there will be (or is) a plugin for JOSM to connect
to datasources which
You could document it on Hoe map ik een.
I'm willing to add it to the Benelux presets .
Both will hopefully lead to a common tagging in Belgium. As far as I know
the CM offices are not tagged that often yet.
At least when there is some form of standard tagging for it, it is easy
to adapt it to
like to
see a standard way of tagging those as well.
Jo
2013/3/4 Marc Gemis marc.ge...@gmail.com
You could document it on Hoe map ik een.
I'm willing to add it to the Benelux presets .
Both will hopefully lead to a common tagging in Belgium. As far as I know
the CM offices are not tagged
I've tried to describe the methods I use to add house numbers (22.000 so
far :-) )
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Escada/JOSM_and_Housenumbers
I'll hope to translate the page in Dutch as well.
regards
m
___
Talk-be mailing list
I made a walk in Hoge Vijvers, Arendonk yesterday. The area did not contain
a lot of tracks and path yet. I started adding them based on my GPX tracks,
Bing and AGIV.
While doing this I noticed an area close to the Dutch border that has
separate areas for each plot of trees and white space
beetje
zinloos om die hier ook toe te voegen.
m.
2013/3/16 Guy Vanvuchelen guido.vanvuche...@pandora.be
Sorry! Ik had niet gezien dat ik onder ‘Gebouwen en monumenten’ moest
kijken.
** **
Guy Vanvuchelen
** **
*Van:* Marc Gemis [mailto:marc.ge...@gmail.com]
*Verzonden:* zaterdag
Ik merk dat er rond Rumst ook een heleboel van die fouten optreden. Ze
willen nu voor de een of andere reden dat er overal route=bicycle wordt aan
toegevoegd. Dat lijkt mij fout.
zie bv. http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/error/252750050
waar ze inderdaad die extra tag als fix voorstellen (zoals
I created an issue for osmose/backend. I did not find any other contact
information.
2013/3/21 André Pirard Papou a.pirard.pa...@gmail.com
On 2013-03-21 22:02, Marc Gemis wrote :
Ik merk dat er rond Rumst ook een heleboel van die fouten optreden. Ze
willen nu voor de een of andere reden
I marked some as false positive near Rumst. I noticed that they were all
reported on 2013-03-21. So probably some recent code change broke something.
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 6:05 AM, André Pirard Papou
a.pirard.pa...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2013-03-22 05:27, Marc Gemis wrote :
I created
This is the reply I got on my bug report to osmose.
Do we have to locate those ways with route=bicycle ?
m
-- Forwarded message --
From: frodrigo notificati...@github.com
Date: Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 9:12 PM
Subject: Re: [osmose-backend] Missing Parent Tag for all highways with
:
On 2013-03-22 21:32, Marc Gemis wrote :
This is the reply I got on my bug report to osmose.
Do we have to locate those ways with route=bicycle ?
m
It makes no sense.
route=bicycle is a tag for a relation, not for a way.
It's very surprising that Osmose commands to repeat such a tag
Did anybody contact the VVM (Vlaamse Milieumaatschappij) before to obtain
the location of their monitoring stations ?
Heeft er al iemand in het verleden de VMM gecontacteerd om de coördinaten
van hun meetstations te verkrijgen ?
zie: http://luchtkwaliteit.vmm.be/
We zouden die meetstations dan
Dat foutje is ondertussen al een paar dagen verholpen, maar doordat josm 14
alle plugins cached, kan je best zelf de cache leegmaken.
Ter herinnering:
Here is another tip when you want to test your wiki preset: JOSM caches the
downloaded preset file for one week. In order to force an update, you
While mapping my RWN walk near Hulshout / Westmeerbeek I noticed that there
were 2 cycleways next to one another, running from north to south:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=51.063594818115234lon=4.8265814781188965zoom=16
One was simply mapped as highway=cycleway, the other had more tags and
This means that the separate track should be removed for the 3 cases I
listed, or not ?
On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 2:31 PM, André Pirard a.pirard.pa...@gmail.comwrote:
On 2013-04-13 23:02, Marc Gemis wrote :
...
So why two lines for an abandoned railway and the cycleway/footway
, or it will diverge a
little bit from the original railway track.
Ben
On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 9:03 PM, Marc Gemis marc.ge...@gmail.com wrote:
This means that the separate track should be removed for the 3 cases I
listed, or not ?
On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 2:31 PM, André Pirard
Your complain about street being placed in wrong cities, is exactly why we
should use associatedStreet relations instead of repeating addr:street
addr:city over and over on individual buildings. In that case you only have
to correct it once, on the relation, and the data is corrected.
But I'll
and that all Potlatch
users will migrate towards it when it does.
Jo
+1 We should not map for the renderer, nor for the (simpliest) editor.
+1 also on not repeating the same data over and over.
2013/4/16 Marc Gemis marc.ge...@gmail.com
I use most of these plugins. But recently I started
, ...)
The official address is e.g. Kerkstraat z/n
How is that mapped ? addr:housenumber = z/n does not sound correct to me.
m.
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 9:32 AM, Glenn Plas gl...@byte-consult.be wrote:
On 04/16/2013 05:41 AM, Marc Gemis wrote:
I use most of these plugins. But recently I started using them
I ended up adding all the shop tags on the building. It only works for
buildings with only 1 shop/restaurant/pub/...
m.
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 11:25 AM, Glenn Plas gl...@byte-consult.be wrote:
On 04/16/2013 11:01 AM, Marc Gemis wrote:
Maybe I should start using the fixaddresses plugin
A week after I send VMM a mail with the question to receive a file with the
coordinates of their monitoring stations, I received an answer. They
pointed me to the 2011 year report that contains all monitoring stations.
It's a PDF-file.
So far I have copied all the data from the PDF-file into a
Can't we contact the French and Dutch people that do similar things ?
For The Netherlands, there is this (long running) forum thread on the BAG:
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=18311p=1
They split the Db up in smaller (.osm) parts that can be imported in JOSM.
Then a manual edit
or is this
only an idea for us to implement? Would be great to collaborate :)
Kind regards,
Pieter
On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 6:32 PM, Marc Gemis marc.ge...@gmail.com wrote:
Pieter,
My killer application to show them would be a single website that
combines the following functionality:
a) walking routes
Glenn,
did you take a look at wandelknooppunt.be ? It shows all the walking
network nodes. You can click on the nodes and it compiles a route from
that, following the walking network routes between the numbered nodes. A
similar thing exists for cyclist.
The user should be able to compose his/her
It would be nice to have a way to get notified of e.g. the ten first edits
of a user in a certain area
Right now, I monitor an area from Antwerp to Mechelen and Sint-Niklaas to
Lier for all changes via
http://simon04.dev.openstreetmap.org/whodidit/scripts/rss.php?bbox=4.10,51.00,4.67,51.30
For
at 1:19 PM, Jo winfi...@gmail.com wrote:
2013/5/17 Marc Gemis marc.ge...@gmail.com
It would be nice to have a way to get notified of e.g. the ten first
edits of a user in a certain area
Indeed.
Right now, I monitor an area from Antwerp to Mechelen and Sint-Niklaas to
Lier for all
Apparently, the tag historic=monument is used incorrectly in a lot of cases.
According to http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/CheckTheMonuments (in
German) and the OSM definition, it should only be used if the following
conditions are fulfilled:
a) a large construction (e.g. a building)
b) you
** **
2013/5/20 Marc Gemis marc.ge...@gmail.com
Apparently, the tag historic=monument is used incorrectly in a lot of
cases.
According to http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/CheckTheMonuments (in
German) and the OSM definition, it should only be used if the following
conditions
).
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/CheckTheMonuments
Gilbert
2013/5/20 Marc Gemis marc.ge...@gmail.com
Bedankt Gilbert Guy. Thanks a lot Gilbert Guy
2013/5/20 Guy Vanvuchelen guido.vanvuche...@pandora.be
Ik heb de wijde omgeving van Tienen nagekeken. Op een paar gevallen na,
die ik
beschermd (dan krijgen ze nog eens
heritage=4)
Maar nogmaals, dit is mijn interpretatie.
m
2013/5/23 Marc Gemis marc.ge...@gmail.com
weer wat bijgeleerd :-)
De meesten lijken me inderdaad monumenten. Zyklopensteine echter niet, dat
is historic=stone denk ik.
Het witte kinderbos is een
I don't see which checkbox corresponds to the addresses. Hopefully they are
smart enough to look at the associated street relation as well (unlike
another quality control tool).
Too bad they do not understand that for walking networks you can have a
relation with 1 member. Now I have to click
Why do they complain about
access = no @ (weight 3.5)
?
I thought this was an accepted way of tagging conditional restrictions. Is
there another way ?
m
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 6:00 AM, Marc Gemis marc.ge...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't see which checkbox corresponds to the addresses
then the item in fr is
numéros de rue
you might find some helps about the errors here :
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Osmose/erreurs
http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/fr/errors/?item=2060
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 7:39 AM, Marc Gemis marc.ge...@gmail.com wrote:
Why do they complain about
So I'll keep on walking and surveying housenumbers
m.
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 10:58 AM, Jo winfi...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm not entirely convinced those Flemish open data licenses would really
help us a lot either.
Do they need a disclaimer shown on each and every rendering of the data?
Jo
via het Nederlandse forum / from the Dutch forum:
http://nl.aldi.be/aldi_outdoornavigatiesysteem_48_5_989_11671.html
___
Talk-be mailing list
Talk-be@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
The past couple of days, I've been cleaning up quite some addresses where I
made mistakes. My apologies, I'll try to be more careful in the future. And
I'll adapt the way I map POIs.
But I also encountered quite a lot of housenumbers where the mapper didn't
bother to add the street. And now I
On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 8:33 AM, Pierre Parmentier
pierrecparment...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
1. Relation http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/2966021 updated.
Please check.
2. Did we agree to include the node with the street number in the
relation?
all buildings with
The streetname can be street A - street B Osmose complains when you have
street A;street B
You can create 2 associated street relations, one for each street + city +
postcode + houses on that side
or if you do not create associated street relations, the name of the street
+ city + postcode on the
side is which.
alt_name isn't used for this.
Ben
On Tuesday 04 June 2013 16:04:07 eMerzh wrote:
What about using alt_name or smth?
On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 3:57 PM, Marc Gemis marc.ge...@gmail.com
wrote:
The streetname can be street A - street B Osmose complains when you
have street
Hi Anton,
It seems that you understood the associated Street relation. You can now
add additional information to the relation such as addr:city,
addr:postalcode. I usually also add addr:country=BE
I never add buildings without an explicit housenumber, thus I would remove
the building under the
fixed it. Wasn't sure which name to use, but I saw in other
examples that both names are combined to form the streetname. In this case
Bronstraat - Hofstede.
Gilbert
On 5 June 2013 07:15, Marc Gemis marc.ge...@gmail.com wrote:
With this overpass query http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/ip you can
/11 Glenn Plas gl...@byte-consult.be
On 06/11/2013 05:29 AM, Marc Gemis wrote:
An update on my problem with postalcode 12 appearing on some roads in
Rumst when you do a seach on openstreetmap.org.
I posted my question in the help forum. One of the nominatim
maintainers (I assume), dropped
/changeset/16512343
m
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 5:17 PM, Glenn Plas gl...@byte-consult.be wrote:
On 06/11/2013 03:01 PM, Marc Gemis wrote:
I'll try again with associated street on Sas or Dijkstraat, Bornem and let
you know my findings. At this moment they return 9140 instead of 2880
and just after I sent the previous mail, house nr 2 got postal code 2880.
Sas, Bornem still give 9140.
m
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 6:21 PM, Marc Gemis marc.ge...@gmail.com wrote:
I just did the test. Immediately after uploading, the DIjkstraat got
postcode 2880 (search Nominatim). Sas not yet
change this erratic behaviour in their code. Otherwise we'll all
be mapping for nominatim soon.
Jo
2013/6/11 Marc Gemis marc.ge...@gmail.com
I just did the test. Immediately after uploading, the DIjkstraat got
postcode 2880 (search Nominatim). Sas not yet. They were uploading in the
same
Yet another way to use the data is to write a small program that extracts
that data. I wrote a small Python program to download all nodes of a
walking network. That data is then converted into a file with waypoints
that I can use on my Garmin GPS.
It will be rather easy to convert this program to
I am under the impression that the designation key is misused a lot in
Belgium. It's used for descriptions, notes, names, etc. (see
http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/nW )
It's hardly used for its intended purpose:
The tag designation=* is used to record the legal classification of a way.
(see
, Glenn Plas gl...@byte-consult.be wrote:
On 06/21/2013 09:12 AM, Glenn Plas wrote:
On 06/20/2013 03:35 PM, Marc Gemis wrote:
I am under the impression that the designation key is misused a lot in
Belgium. It's used for descriptions, notes, names, etc. (see
http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/nW
I'm interested in the usage of historic=battlefield.
I saw that someone added this to e.g. to a cemetery in Eppegem (Zemst)
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/node/2308368137
There are also a lot of those tags around Bonheiden - Rijmenam - Keerbergen:
, so I'll take a look there too after I see
what has been done here.
Glenn
On 06/24/2013 09:37 PM, Marc Gemis wrote:
I'm interested in the usage of historic=battlefield.
I saw that someone added this to e.g. to a cemetery in Eppegem (Zemst)
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/node
boodschappen te gaan vertalen. Er is ook nog Google
translate. Verre van perfect als oplossing, dat besef ik ook wel.
Jo
2013/6/25 Marc Gemis marc.ge...@gmail.com
Ivo, ik geef je gelijk dat we sommige mappers afschrikken door alle/veel
communicatie in het Engels te doen.
I'll agree that we
1 - 100 of 1573 matches
Mail list logo
